PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of aapspharmspringer.comThis journalToc AlertsSubmit OnlineOpen Choice
 
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2006 March; 7(1): E153–E162.
Published online 2006 March 10. doi:  10.1208/pt070122
PMCID: PMC2750729

Wet granulation in rotary processor and fluid bed: Comparison of granule and tablet properties

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare granule and tablet properties of granules prepared by wet granulation in a rotary processor or a conventional fluid bed. For this purpose the working range of selected process variables was determined and a factorial study with 3 factors (equipment type, filler type, and liquid addition rate) and 1 covariate (fluidizing air flow rate) was performed. Two grades of calcium carbonate with different size and shape characteristics were applied, and the liquid addition and fluidizing air flow rates were investigated in the widest possible range. Dry mixtures of microcrystalline cellulose, polyvinyl povidone, calcium carbonate, and riboflavin, in a 10[ratio]5[ratio]84[ratio]1 ratio, were granulated in both types of equipment. The granulation end point was determined manually in the fluid bed and by torque measurements in the rotary processor. The filler type had a more pronounced effect on granular properties in the fluid bed, but the rotary processor showed a higher dependency on the investigated process variables. The rotary processor gave rise to more dense granules with better flow properties, but the fluid bed granules had slightly better compressional properties. Furthermore, the distribution of a low-dose drug was found to be more homogeneous in the rotary processor granules and tablets. Generally, wet granulation in a rotary processor was found to be a good alternative to conventional fluid bed granulation, especially when cohesive powders with poor flow properties or formulations with low drug content are to be granulated by a fluidizing air technique.

Keywords: Wet granulation, fluid bed, rotary processor

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (428K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
1. Watano S, Sato Y, Miyanami K, Murakami T, Oda N. Scale-up of agitation fluidized bed granulation. Part 1: preliminary experimental approach for optimization of process variables. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 1995;43:1212–1216.
2. Holm P, Bonde M, Wigmore T. Pelletization by granulation in a roto-processor RP-2, Part 1: effects of process and product variables on granule growth. Pharm Technol Eur. 1996;8:22–36.
3. Turkoglu M, He M, Sakr A. Evaluation of rotary fluidized-bed as a wet granulation equipment. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1995;41:388–394.
4. Jäger K-F, Bauer KH. Effects of material motion on agglomeration in the rotary fluidized bed granulator. Drugs Made Ger. 1982;25:61–65.
5. Leuenberger H, Luy B, Struder J. New development in the control of a moist agglomeration and pelletization process. STP Pharma Sci. 1990;6:303–309.
6. Vuppala MK, Parikh DM, Bhagat HR. Application of powderlayering technology and film coating for manufacture of sustained-release pellets using a rotary fluid bed processor. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1997;23:687–694. doi: 10.3109/03639049709150770. [Cross Ref]
7. Gu L, Liew CV, Heng PW. Wet spheronization by rotary processing: a multistage single-pot process for producing spheroids. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2004;30:111–123. doi: 10.1081/DDC-120028706. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Kristensen J, Schaefer T, Kleinebudde P. Direct pelletization in a rotary processor controlled by torque measurements, I: influence of process variables. Pharm Dev Technol. 2000;5:247–256. doi: 10.1081/PDT-100100539. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Vertommen J, Kinget R. The influence of five selected processing and formulation variables on the particle size, particle size distribution, and friability of pellets produced in a rotary processor. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1997;23:39–46. doi: 10.3109/03639049709148480. [Cross Ref]
10. Kristensen J, Schaefer T, Kleinebudde P. Direct pelletization in a rotary processor controlled by torque measurement, II: effect of changes in the content of microcrystalline cellulose. AAPS PharmSci. 2000;2:E24–E24. doi: 10.1208/ps020324. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Kristensen J. Direct pelletization in a rotary processor controlled by torque measurements, III: investigation of microcrystalline cellulose and lactose grade. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2005;6:E495–E503. doi: 10.1208/pt060362. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Robinson RL, Hollenbeck RG. Manufacture of spherical acetaminophen pellets: comparison of rotary processing with multiple-step extrusion and spheronization. Pharm Technol. 1991;15:48–56.
13. Petersen FJ, Wørts O, Schæfer T, Sojka PE. Effervescent atomization of aqueous polymer solutions and dispersions. Pharm Dev Technol. 2001;6:201–210. doi: 10.1081/PDT-100000737. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. European Pharmacopeia. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe; 2002.

Articles from AAPS PharmSciTech are provided here courtesy of American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists