PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of aapspharmspringer.comThis journalToc AlertsSubmit OnlineOpen Choice
 
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2003 December; 4(4): 418–424.
Published online 2003 September 2. doi:  10.1208/pt040453
PMCID: PMC2750646

A new method to predict flowability using a microscale fluid bed

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to develop a new method to predict the flow behavior of pharmaceutical powders using a multichamber microscale fluid bed. Different amounts of poorly flowing paracetamol were added to various grades of microcrystalline celluloses and silicified microcrystalline cellulose powders. Magnesium stearate was used as a lubricant. Experimental minimum fluidization velocities (umf) were defined using 2 to 4 g (equal to 10 mL) of material (Video 1). The reference flowability of the powders was determined using a specific flow meter. Also, the weight variation of the compressed powders, using a single-punch press, was measured. When the amount of paracetamol in the excipients was increased, the experimentalumf increased and the fluidization behavior grew worse (Video 2). Principal component analysis (PCA) established that the pressure difference over the bed as a function of fluidization velocity could be used to characterize the behavior of powders. The increase in poor fluidization behavior of the powders was in accordance with the increasing amount of paracetamol and with the increasing weight variation of the tablets. Furthermore, the angle of repose and the flow rate of silicified microcrystalline cellulose powders were predicted using a partial least squares (PLS) model. The developed method to predict flowability is a promising approach for use in the preformulation and formulation stages of new drug candidates, for example.

Keywords: fluid bed, flowability, formulation, preformulation

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (389K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
1. Bjerrum OJ. New safe medicines faster: a proposition for a pan-European research effort. Nature Rev Drug Discov. 2002;1(5):395–398. doi: 10.1038/nrd797. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Brittain HG, Bogdanowich SJ, Bugay DE, De Vincentis J, Lewen G, Newman AW. Physical characterization of pharmaceutical solids. Pharm. Res. 1991;8(8):963–973. doi: 10.1023/A:1015888520352. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Rowe RC. Small is beautiful. PSTT. 2000;3:187–188. [PubMed]
4. Hancock BC, Clas S-D, Christensen K. Micro-scale measurement of the mechanical properties of compressed pharmaceutical powders. 2. The elasticity and fracture behavior of microcrystalline cellulose. Int J Pharm. 2000;209:27–35. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(00)00541-X. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Bock TK, Kraas U. Experience with the Diosna mini-granulator and assessment of process scalability. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2001;52:297–303. doi: 10.1016/S0939-6411(01)00197-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Räsänen E, Rantanen J, Mannermaa J-P, Yliruusi J, Vuorela H. Dehydration studies using a novel multichamber microscale fluid bed dryer with in-line NIR measurement. J Pharm Sci. 2003;92(10):2074–2081. doi: 10.1002/jps.10456. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Räsänen E, Rantanen J, Mannermaa J-P, Yliruusi J. The characterization of fluidization behavior using a novel multichamber microscale fluid bed.J. Pharm. Sci. In press. [PubMed]
8. Murtomaa M, Räsänen E, Rantanen J, Bailey A, Laine E, Mannermaa J-P, Yliruusi J. Electrostatic measurement on a miniaturized fluidized bed. J Electrostat. 2002;57:91–106. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3886(02)00121-3. [Cross Ref]
9. Smith A. Screening for drug discovery: the leading question. Nature. 2002;418:453–459. [PubMed]
10. Doelker E, Massuelle D, Veuillez F, Humbert-Drotz P. Morphological, packing, flow and tableting properties of new avicel types. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1995;21(6):643–661. doi: 10.3109/03639049509048132. [Cross Ref]
11. Velasco MV, Munoz-Ruiz A, Monedero MC, Jimenez-Castellanos MR. Study of flowability of powders: effect of the addition of lubricants. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1995;21(20):2385–2391. doi: 10.3109/03639049509070877. [Cross Ref]
12. Sherwood BE, Becker JW. A new class of high-functionality excipients: silicified microcrystalline cellulose. Pharm Technol. 1998;10:78–83.
13. Aulton ME. Pharmaceutics: The Science of Dosage Form Design. 2nd ed. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
14. Carr RL. Classifying flow properties of solids. Chem. Eng. 1965;72(3):69–72.
15. Hausner HH. Friction conditions in a mass of metal powder. Int J Powder Metall. 1967;3(4):7–13.
16. Bailey AG. Electrostatic phenomena during powder handling. Powder Technol. 1984;37:71–85. doi: 10.1016/0032-5910(84)80007-8. [Cross Ref]
17. Visser J. Van der Waals and other cohesive forces affecting powder fluidization. Powder Technol. 1989;58:1–10. doi: 10.1016/0032-5910(89)80001-4. [Cross Ref]
18. Smith A. New safe medicines faster. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2001;22(2):62–62. doi: 10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01651-5. [Cross Ref]
19. Kunii D, Levenspiel O. Fluidization Engineering. 2nd ed. Stoneham, MA: Butterworth-Heinamann; 1991.
20. Schüssele A, Bauer-Brandl A. Note on the measurement of flowability according to the European Pharmacopoeias. Int J Pharm. 2003;257:301–304. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(03)00142-X. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Wen CY, Yu YH. A generalized method for predicting the minimum fluidization velocity. AIChE J. 1966;12(3):610–612. doi: 10.1002/aic.690120343. [Cross Ref]
22. Saxena SC, Vogel GJ. The measurement of incipient fluidization velocities in a bed of coarse dolomite at temperature and pressure. Trans IchemE. 1977;55:184–189.
23. Chitester DC, Kornosky RM, Fan L-S, Danko JP. Characteristics of fluidization at high pressure. Chem Eng Sci. 1984;39:253–261. doi: 10.1016/0009-2509(84)80025-1. [Cross Ref]
24. Noda K, Uchida T, Makino T, Kamo H. Minimum fluidization velocity of binary mixture of particles with large size ratio. Powder Technol. 1986;46:149–154. doi: 10.1016/0032-5910(86)80021-3. [Cross Ref]
25. Lippens BC, Mulder J. Prediction of the minimum fluidization velocity. Powder Technol. 1993;75:67–78. doi: 10.1016/0032-5910(93)80026-7. [Cross Ref]
26. Rao TR, Bheemaraseti JVR. Minimum fluidization velocities of mixtures of biomass and sands. Energy. 2001;26:633–644. doi: 10.1016/S0360-5442(01)00014-7. [Cross Ref]
27. Davidson JF, Clift R, Harrison D. Fluidization. 2nd ed. Orlando, FL: Academic Press; 1985.

Articles from AAPS PharmSciTech are provided here courtesy of American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists