PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of aapspharmspringer.comThis journalToc AlertsSubmit OnlineOpen Choice
 
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2005 December; 6(4): E573–E585.
Published online 2005 November 17. doi:  10.1208/pt060472
PMCID: PMC2750605

Box-Behnken experimental design in the development of a nasal drug delivery system of model drug hydroxyurea: Characterization of viscosity, in vitro drug release, droplet size, and dynamic surface tension

Abstract

The purpose of the research was to investigate the changes in physicochemical properties and their influence on nasal formulation performance using 5-factor, 3-level Box-Behnken experimental design on the combined responses of viscosity, droplet size distribution (DSD), and drug release. Gel formulations of hydroxyurea (HU) with surface-active polymers (hydroxyethylcellulose [HEC] and polyethylene-oxide [PEO]) and ionic excipients (sodium chloride and calcium chloride) were prepared using Box-Behnken experimental design. The rheology and dynamic surface tension (DST) of the test formulations was investigated using LV-DV-III Brookfield rheometer and T60 SITA tensiometer, respectively. Droplet size analysis of nasal aerosols was determined by laser diffraction using the Malvern Spraytec with the InnovaSystems actuator. In vitro drug release studies were conducted on Franz diffusion cells. With PEO gel, calcium chloride increased the viscosity and DSD and retarded drug release, while sodium chloride decreased the viscosity, DST, and DSD and accelerated the release of HU. With HEC gel, the addition of the above salts resulted in less significant changes in viscosity, DSD, and DST, but both salts significantly increased the release of HU. Droplet size data obtained from a high viscosity nasal pump was dependent on type of polymer, polymer-excipient interactions, and solvent properties. The applications of Box-Behnken experimental design facilitated the prediction and identified major excipient influences on viscosity, DSD, and in vitro drug release.

Keywords: hydroxyurea, viscosity, dynamic surface tension, Box-Behnken experimental design, nasal delivery

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (733K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
1. Dayal P, Shaik MS, Singh M. Evaluation of different parameters that affect droplet-size distribution from nasal sprays using the Malvern Spraytec. J Pharm Sci. 2004;93:1725–1742. doi: 10.1002/jps.20090. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Malmsten M. Surfactants and Polymers in Drug Delivery. Lancaster, PA: Dekker; 2002.
3. Rotthäuser B, Kraus G, Schmidt PC. Optimization of an effervescent tablet formulation using a central composite design optimization of an effervescent tablet formulation containing spray driedL-leucine and polyethylene glycol 6000 as lubricants using a central composite design. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1998;46:85–94. doi: 10.1016/S0939-6411(97)00154-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Nazzal S, Nutan M, Palamakula A, Shah R, Zaghloul A, Khan MA. Optimization of a self-nanoemulsified tablet dosage form of Ubiquinone using response surface methodology: effect of formulation ingredients. Int J Pharm. 2002;240:103–114. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00130-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Poncet-Legrand C, Lafuma F, Audebert R. Rheological behavior of colloidal dispersions of hydrophobic particles stabilized in water by amphiphilic polyelectrolytes. Colloids Surf A: Physicochemical Eng Aspects. 1999;152:251–261. doi: 10.1016/S0927-7757(98)00510-X. [Cross Ref]
6. Chiotelli E, Pilosio G, Meste M. Effect of sodium chloride on the gelatinization of starch: a multimeasurement study. Biopolymers. 2002;63:41–58. doi: 10.1002/bip.1061. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Box GEP, Behnken DW. Some new 3 level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics. 1960;2:455–475. doi: 10.2307/1266454. [Cross Ref]
8. Omelczuk MO, McGinity JW. The influence of thermal treatment on the physical-mechanical and dissolution properties of tablets containing poly(DL-lactic acid) Pharm Res. 1993;10:542–548. doi: 10.1023/A:1018993818206. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Pillay V, Fassihi R. Evaluation and comparison of dissolution data derived from different modified release dosage forms: an alternative method. J Control Release. 1998;55:45–55. doi: 10.1016/S0168-3659(98)00022-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Borodin O, Smith GD. Molecular dynamic simulations of poly (ethylene oxide)/LiI melts. 2. dynamic properties. Macromolecules. 2000;33:2273–2283. doi: 10.1021/ma991429h. [Cross Ref]
11. Zon A, Bel G-J, Mos B, Verkerk P, Leeuw SW. Structural relaxation in polyethylene oxide: salt solutions. Comp Mater Sci. 2000;17:265–269. doi: 10.1016/S0927-0256(00)00036-7. [Cross Ref]
12. Smitter LM, Guedez JF, Muller AJ, Saez AE. Interactions between poly(ethylene oxide) and sodium dodecyl sulfate in elongational flows. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2001;236:343–353. doi: 10.1006/jcis.2001.7438. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Dougherty RC. Density of salt solutions: effect of ions on the apparent density of water. J Phys Chem B. 2001;105:4514–4519. doi: 10.1021/jp010097r. [Cross Ref]
14. Leberman R, Soper AK. Effect of high-salt concentrations on waterstructure. Nature. 1995;378:364–366. doi: 10.1038/378364a0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Walrafen GE, Chu YC. Shear viscosity and self-diffusion evidence for high concentrations of hydrogen-bonded clathrate-like structures in very highly supercooled liquid water. J Phys Chem. 1995;99:10635–10643. doi: 10.1021/j100026a030. [Cross Ref]
16. Madan B, Sharp K. Changes in water structure induced by a hydrophobic solute probed by simulation of the water hydrogen bond angle and radial distribution functions. Biophys Chem. 1999;78:33–41. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4622(98)00227-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Hakem F, Lal J. Polyelectrolyte-like behavior of poly(ethylene-oxide) solutions with added monovalent salt. Europhys Lett. 2003;64:204–210. doi: 10.1209/epl/i2003-00294-2. [Cross Ref]
18. Bernson A, Lindgren J, Weiwei H, Frech R. Coordination and conformation in PEO, PEGM, and PEG systems containing lithium or lanthanum triflate. Polym. 1995;36:4471–4478. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(95)96855-3. [Cross Ref]
19. McCallion ON, Taylor KM, Thomas M, Taylor AY. Nebulization of fluids with different viscosity and surface tension. J Aerosol Med. 1995;8:281–284. doi: 10.1089/jam.1995.8.281. [Cross Ref]
20. Newman SP, Pellow PG, Clarke SW. Droplets sizes from medical atomizer (nebulizers) for drug solutions of different viscosity and surface tension. Atomization Spray Tech. 1987;3:1–11.
21. McCallion ON, Patel MJ. Viscosity effects on nebulization of aqueous solutions. Int J Pharm. 1996;130:245–249. doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(95)04291-1. [Cross Ref]
22. Frese Ch, Ruppert S, Sugar M, et al. Adsorption kinetics of surfactant mixtures from micellar solutions as studied by maximum bubble pressure technique. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2003;267:475–482. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00614-3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Šarković D, Babović V. Experiments of water aerosol estimations of droplet parameters. Physics, Chemistry and Technology. 2002;2:197–208.
24. Biswas G, Som SK. Coefficient of discharge and spray cone angle of a pressure nozzle with combined axial and tangential entry of power-law fluids. Appl Sci Res. 1986;43:3–22. doi: 10.1007/BF00385725. [Cross Ref]
25. Rayleigh L. On the instability of jets. Proc Lond Math Soc. 1878;10:4–13. doi: 10.1112/plms/s1-10.1.4. [Cross Ref]
26. Squire HB. Investigation of the instability of a moving liquid film. Brit J Appl Phys. 1953;4:167–169. doi: 10.1088/0508-3443/4/6/302. [Cross Ref]
27. Thomas GO. The aerodynamic breakup of ligaments. Atomization and Sprays. 2003;13:117–129. doi: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v13.i1.60. [Cross Ref]
28. Martin A. Physical Pharmacy: Physical Chemical Principles in the Pharmaceutical Sciences. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Fabiger; 1993.
29. Scatena LF, Brown MG, Richmond GL. Water at hydrophobic surfaces: weak hydrogen bonding and strong orientation effects. Science. 2001;292:908–912. doi: 10.1126/science.1059514. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from AAPS PharmSciTech are provided here courtesy of American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists