PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of aapspharmspringer.comThis journalToc AlertsSubmit OnlineOpen Choice
 
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2000 September; 1(3): 44–52.
Published online 2000 July 18. doi:  10.1208/pt010321
PMCID: PMC2750349

Development of a dual approach to assess powder flow from avalanching behavior

Abstract

The purposes of this investigation were to develop a method to evaluate flow properties of powders from avalanching tests and to detect similarities and relationships between these data and conventional powder flow properties. The API AeroFlow® automated flowability analyzer was tested using 6 pharmaceutical excipients. Data were presented as mean time to avalanche (MTA), scatter, and a classification based on the type of motion of the powder bed. Powders were also characterized in terms of particle size, particle shape, loss of weight on drying, Carr’s compressibility index, and critical orifice diameter to prevent ratholing. A dual approach, which combines visual observation of the type of motion of the powder bed in the rotating drum with numerical descriptors such as MTA and scatter, was found to be more accurate in the assessment of powder flow than the current practice of using only MTA and scatter values. Statistical analysis established that there are relationships and similarities between the ranking of powder flow properties obtained from the avalanching test and Carr’s compressibility index and the critical orifice diameter. An interaction between particle size and shape, both influencing powder flow, when evaluated with these methods was found. The assessment of the flowability of powders on the basis of avalanching tests should include both the determination of numerical descriptors of flow such as MTA and scatter, and a determination of the type of motion of the powder bed in order to increase the sensitivity of the method to small changes in powder flow properties.

Keywords: Avalanching of Powders, Carr’s Compressibility Index, Critical Orifice Diameter, Perceptual Mapping, Powder Flow

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (334K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
1. Ridgway K, Scotton JB. Aspects of pharmaceutical engineering. Pharm J. 1972;208:574–576.
2. Carr RL. Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chem Eng. 1965;72:163–168.
3. Hausner HH. Friction conditions in a mass of metal powder. Int J Powder Metall. 1967;3:7–13.
4. Lüdde KH, Kawakita K. Die Pulverkompression. Pharmazie. 1966;21:393–403.
5. Carr JF, Walker DM. An annular shear cell for granular materials. Powder Technol. 1967;1:369–373. doi: 10.1016/0032-5910(68)80019-1. [Cross Ref]
6. Walker DM. An approximate theory for pressures and arching in hoppers. Chem Eng Sci. 1966;21:975–997. doi: 10.1016/0009-2509(66)85095-9. [Cross Ref]
7. Jenike AW. Gravity flow of bulk solids. Utah Eng Exp Stn Bull. 1961;108:1–294.
8. Jenike AW. Storage and flow of solids. Utah Eng Exp Stn Bull. 1964;123:1–194.
9. Podczeck F, Sharma M. The influence of particle size and shape of components of binary powder mixtures on the maximum volume reduction due to packing. Int J Pharm. 1996;137:41–47. doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(95)04420-5. [Cross Ref]
10. Führer C. Interparticulate attraction mechanisms. In: Alderborn G, Nyström C, editors. Pharmaceutical Powder Compaction Technology. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 1996. pp. 1–15.
11. Podczeck F. Particle-Particle Interactions in Pharmaceutical Powder Handling. London, England: Imperial College Press; 1998.
12. Tan SB, Newton JM. Powder flowability as an indication of capsule filling performance. Int J Pharm. 1990;61:145–155. doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(90)90053-7. [Cross Ref]
13. Podczeck F, Newton JM. Powder filling into hard gelatine capsules on a tamp filling machine. Int J Pharm. 1999;185:237–254. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(99)00169-6. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Trowbridge L, Williams AC, York P, Worthington VL, Dennis AB. A comparison of methods for determining powder flow: correlation with tabletting performance. Pharm Res. 1997;14:S–415.
15. Jolliffe IG, Newton JM, Walters K. Theoretical considerations of the filling of pharmaceutical hard gelatin capsules. Powder Technol. 1980;27:189–195. doi: 10.1016/0032-5910(80)85021-2. [Cross Ref]
16. Tan SB, Newton JM. Minimum compression stress requirements for arching and powder retention within a dosator nozzle during capsule filling. Int J Pharm. 1990;63:275–280. doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(90)90134-P. [Cross Ref]
17. Flemming J, Mielck JB. Requirements for the production of microtablets: suitability of direct-compression excipients estimated from powder characteristics and flow rates. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1995;21:2239–2251. doi: 10.3109/03639049509065904. [Cross Ref]
18. Kaye BH, Gratton-Liimatainen J, Faddis N. Studying the avalanching behavior of powder in a rotating disc. Part Part Syst Charact. 1995;12:232–236. doi: 10.1002/ppsc.19950120505. [Cross Ref]
19. Kaye BH. Characterizing the flowability of a powder using the concepts of fractal geometry and chaos theory. Part Part Syst Charact. 1997;14:53–66.
20. Brown GJ, Creasey DS, Miles NJ. Coal handleability—a good or a bad coal. Part Part Syst Charact. 1996;13:260–263. doi: 10.1002/ppsc.19960130409. [Cross Ref]
21. Gleik J. Chaos, Making a New Science. New York, NY: Viking-Penguin Inc; 1987.
22. Bak P, Chen K. Self organized criticality. Sci Am. 1991;264:46–53. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0191-46. [Cross Ref]
23. Henein H, Brimacombe JK, Watkinson AP. An experimental study of segregation in rotary kilns. Metall Trans. B. 1983;16:763–775. doi: 10.1007/BF02667512. [Cross Ref]
24. Boateng AA, Barr PV. Modeling of particle mixing and segregation in the transverse plane of a rotary kiln. Chem Eng Sci. 1996;51:4167–4181. doi: 10.1016/0009-2509(96)00250-3. [Cross Ref]
25. Podczeck F. A shape factor to assess the shape of particles using image analysis. Powder Technol. 1997;93:47–53. doi: 10.1016/S0032-5910(97)03257-9. [Cross Ref]
26. Zimon AD. Adhesion of Dust and Powder. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Consultants Bureau; 1982.
27. Walker DM. An approximate theory for pressures and arching in hoppers. Chem Eng Sci. 1966;21:975–997. doi: 10.1016/0009-2509(66)85095-9. [Cross Ref]
28. Walters JK. A theoretical analysis of stresses in silos with vertical walls. Chem Eng Sci. 1973;28:13–21. doi: 10.1016/0009-2509(73)85081-X. [Cross Ref]
29. Hawkins AE. The Shape of Powder—Particle Outlines. Taunton, Somerset, England: Research Studies Press Ltd; 1993.
30. Tenenhaus M, Young FW. An analysis and synthesis of multiple correspondence analysis, optimal scaling, dual scaling and other methods for quantifying categorial multivariate data. Psychometrika. 1985;50:90–104. doi: 10.1007/BF02294151. [Cross Ref]

Articles from AAPS PharmSciTech are provided here courtesy of American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists