PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of aapspharmspringer.comThis journalToc AlertsSubmit OnlineOpen Choice
 
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2002 June; 3(2): 16–25.
Published online 2002 May 30. doi:  10.1208/pt030208
PMCID: PMC2750310

Viscoelastic evaluation of topical creams containing microcrystalline cellulose/sodium carboxymethyl cellulose as stabilizer

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the viscoelastic properties of topical creams containing various concentrations of microcrystalline cellulose and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (Avicel® CL-611) as a stabilizer. Avicel CL-611 was used at 4 different levels (1%, 2%, 4%, and 6% dispersion) to prepare topical creams, and hydrocortisone acetate was used as a model drug. The viscoelastic properties such as loss modulus (G), storage modulus (G), and loss tangent (tan δ) of these creams were measured using a TA Instruments AR 1000 Rheometer and compared to a commercially available formulation. Continuous flow test to determine the yield stress and thixotropic behavior, and dynamic mechanical tests for determining the linear viscosity time sweep data, were performed. Drug release from the various formulations was studied using an Enhancer TM Cell assembly. Formulations containing 1% and 2% Avicel CL-611 had relative viscosity, yield stress, and thixotropic values that were similar to those of the commercial formulation. The elastic modulus (G) of the 1% and 2% formulation was relatively high and did not cross the loss modulus (G), indicating that the gels were strong. In the commercial formulation,G increased after preshearing and broke down after 600 seconds. The strain sweep tests showed that for all formulations containing Avicel CL-611, theG was aboveG with a good distance between them. The gel strength and the predominance ofG can be ranked 6%>4%>2%. The strain profiles for the 1% and 2% formulations were similar to those of the commercial formulation. The δ values for the 1% and 2% formulations were similar, and the formulations containing 4% Avicel CL-611 had lower δ values, indicating greater elasticity. Drug release from the commercial preparation was fastest compared to the formulations prepared using Avicel CL-611, a correlation with the viscoelastic properties. It was found that viscoelastic data, especially the strain sweep profiles of products containing Avicel CL-611 1% and 2%, correlated with the commercial formulation. Rheological tests that measure the viscosity, yield stress, thixotropic behavior, other oscillatory parameters such asG andG are necessary tools in predicting performance of semisolids.

Key Words: Viscoelastic, Microstructure, Cream, Avicel CL-611, Hydrocortisone acetate, Storage modulus, Loss modulus, Thixotropic, Bridging flocculation

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (526K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
1. Smith AK, Goff HD, Kakuda Y. Microstructure and rheological properties of whipped cream as affected by heat treatment and addition of stabilizer. Int Dairy J. 2000;10(4):295–301. doi: 10.1016/S0958-6946(00)00043-1. [Cross Ref]
2. Eccleston GM, Behan-Martin MK, Jones GR, Towns-Andrew E. Synchrotron X-ray investigations into lamellar gel phase formed in pharmaceutical creams prepared with cetrimide and fatty alcohols. Int J Pharm. 2000;203(1–2):127–139. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(00)00447-6. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Dickinson E, Golding M. Influence of calcium ions on creaming and theology of emulsions containing sodium caseinate. Colloids Surf. A. 1998;144(1–3):167–177. doi: 10.1016/S0927-7757(98)00573-1. [Cross Ref]
4. Dickinson E, Golding M. Rheology of sodium caseinate stabilized oil-in-water emulsions. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1997;19(1):166–176. doi: 10.1006/jcis.1997.4939. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Teo YH, Goddard P, Barrett DA, Melia CD. The microstructure of creams revealed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1998;50(suppl):132–132.
6. Regola A, Carnesi M, Dolfini A, Gazzaniga A. Use of thermogravimetry in the physicochemical characterization of hydrophilic creams. Boll Chim Farm. 1996;135(2):67–71.
7. Caldwell KB, Goff HD, Stanley D. A low-temperature scanning electron microscopy study of ice cream: II. Influence of selected ingredients and processes. Food Struct. 1992;11(1):11–23.
8. Holland SJ, Warrack JK. Low-temperature scanning electron microscopy of the phase inversion process in a cream formulation. Int J Pharm. 1990;65(3):225–234. doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(90)90147-V. [Cross Ref]
9. Niemi L, Laine E. Effect of water content on the microstructure of an o/w cream. Int J Pharm. 1991;68(1–3):205–214. doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(91)90143-C. [Cross Ref]
10. Tiemessen HLGM, Van der Maarel JRC, Bodde HE, Jousma H, Jinginger HE. Probing the microstructure of liquid crystalline surfactant systems: a physicochemical study using the rheometry, DTA and oxygen-17 NMR. Neth J Controlled Release. 1990;13(1):73–81. doi: 10.1016/0168-3659(90)90076-6. [Cross Ref]
11. Radebaugh GW. Rheological and mechanical properties of dispersed Ssystems. In: Liberman HA, Rieger MM, Banker GS, editors. Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Disperse Systems. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 1996. pp. 153–209.
12. Jones DS, Woolfson AD, Brown AF. Viscoelastic properties of bioadhesive, chlorhexidine-containing semisolids for topical application to the oropharynx. Pharm Res. 1998;15:1131–1136. doi: 10.1023/A:1011906917084. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Tamburic S, Craig DQ, Vuleta G, Milic J. An investigation into the use of thermorheology and texture analysis in the evaluation of w/o creams stabilized with a silicone emulsifier. Pharm Dev Technol. 1996;1:299–306. doi: 10.3109/10837459609022599. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Yu DM, Amidon GL, Weiner ND, Goldberg AH. Viscoelastic properties of Poly(ethylene oxide) solution. J Pharm Sci. 1994;83:1443–1449. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600831016. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Gasperlin M, Tusar L, Tusar M, Kristl J, Smid-Korbar J. Lipophilic semisolid emulsion systems: viscoelastic behavior and prediction of physical stability by neural network. Int J Pharm. 1998;168:243–254. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(98)00099-4. [Cross Ref]
16. Dolz M, Roldan C. The influence of heating time on the rheological behavior of a microcrystalline cellulose hydrogel. Pharmazie. 1992;47:134–136.
17. Avicel RC/CL Microcrystalline Cellulose and Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium, NF. Bulletin RC-16, FMC Corporation. 1988: 3.
18. Villivalam VD, Rege PR, Collins CC. Development in release testing of topical dosage forms: use of the Enhancer Cell with automated sampling. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1998;17:1225–1233. doi: 10.1016/S0731-7085(97)00184-2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Henderson NL, Meer PM, Kostenbauder HB. Approximate rates of shear encountered in some pharmaceutical processes. J Pharm Sci. 1961;50:788–791. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600500920. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Rohn CL. The rheology of coatings and dispersions. J. Water-borne Coatings. 1987;10(3):12–17.
21. Lippacher A, Muller RH, Mader K. Investigation on the viscoelastic properties of lipid-based colloidal drug carriers. Int J Pharm. 2000;196:227–230. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(99)00428-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Ulbrich R. Rheology of liquids and viscoelastic characterization of semisolids, TA Instruments. Paper presented at: Duquesne University Pharmaceutical Seminar Series: Pharmaceutical Unit Processes and Liquid Dosage Form Development: Industry and Regulatory Perspectives: May 22–25, 2000; Pittsburgh, PA.

Articles from AAPS PharmSciTech are provided here courtesy of American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists