The findings we report in this sample of healthy, older adults are most consistent with the notion that depression may lead to, rather than result from, augmented inflammation. Path analytic models revealed that greater depressive symptom severity at baseline was associated with larger 6-year increases in serum IL-6, even after adjustment for demographic, biomedical, and behavioral factors. Importantly, the magnitude of this relationship is not trivial; only one of the control variables, BMI, was a stronger predictor than depressive symptoms. The observed relationship also appears to be specific to depression (i.e., independent of anxiety and hostility) and driven primarily by the somatic-vegetative symptom cluster. Contrasting with these results, baseline IL-6 was not a predictor of 6-year change in depressive symptoms. We did observe evidence of a weak bidirectional relationship between depressive symptoms and serum CRP over time; however, these results should be interpreted with caution because neither direction of this relationship was significant. Taken together, our findings suggest that depressive symptoms may precede and augment some inflammatory processes implicated in the pathogenesis of CAD among healthy, older adults. Thus, our findings are concordant with a conceptual framework in which the effect of depression on CAD outcomes is mediated, in part, by augmented inflammation (
Kop, 1999). It should be noted, however, that recent studies have found that inflammation accounts for only a small portion of the cardiotoxic effect of depression (
Vaccarino et al., 2007;
Whooley et al., 2008), suggesting that multiple mechanisms are at work.
Depression-related dysfunction in two systems that normally exert anti-inflammatory effects could explain how depression might increase inflammatory activity over time, as was observed in this study. Clinical depression and subthreshold depressive symptoms have both been linked with hyperactivity of the HPA axis, as indicated by elevated glucocorticoid levels (
Plotsky et al., 1998;
van Eck et al., 1996), and diminished activation of the parasympathetic nervous system, as indicated by reduced heart rate variability (
Carney et al., 2005;
Thayer et al., 1998). Although glucocorticoids do suppress inflammation in the short-term (
Guyton and Hall, 2000), sustained elevations over time may bring about downregulation or desensitization of the macrophage glucocorticoid receptors, which could result in blunted anti-inflammatory responses to these hormones (
Leonard, 2001;
Miller et al., 2002a). Similar to glucocorticoids, existing evidence indicates that parasympathetic activation also curbs inflammation (
Tracey, 2002). As an example, recent investigations have shown that reduced heart rate variably is associated with increased levels of IL-6 and CRP (
Sajadieh et al., 2004;
Sloan et al., 2007).
To our knowledge, five previous studies have evaluated prospective associations between depression and inflammation: three examined the relationship from depression to future inflammation (
Boyle et al., 2007;
Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 2003;
Matthews et al., 2007), one examined the relationship from inflammation to future depression (
van den Biggelaar et al., 2007), and one examined both directions of this association (
Gimeno et al., 2009). Paralleling our findings,
Boyle and colleagues (2007) reported that a composite score – representing the shared variance among depression, hostility, and anger – predicted 10-year increases in another CAD-relevant inflammatory marker, the third complement protein (C3). It is worth noting that secondary analyses revealed that each individual negative emotion predicted C3 change as well. Similar to the current study, the relationship between the negative emotion composite score and C3 was not present at baseline but instead emerged over time. Also consistent with our observations,
Matthews et al. (2007) did not detect an association between baseline depressive symptoms and change in CRP over a 5-year period. Furthermore,
Gimeno and colleagues’ (2009) finding that the cognitive symptoms of depression did not predict 12-year changes in IL-6 and CRP is in line with our BDI-II subscale analyses, in which we observed that the somatic-vegetative subscale, but not the cognitive-affective subscale, predicted IL-6 change.
Kiecolt-Glaser et al. (2003), however, reported findings that contradict ours; they found that baseline depressive symptom severity was not associated with 6-year change in IL-6. Of relevance, these researchers administered the 13-item BDI (
Beck and Beck, 1972), which primarily assesses the cognitive-affective symptom cluster (
Beck et al., 1988). In addition to this investigation, results of the two studies examining inflammatory markers as predictors of future depressive symptoms conflict with our findings. Specifically, in the study conducted by
van den Biggelaar et al. (2007), baseline CRP and stimulated production of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) were positively associated with 5-year change in depressive symptoms, although the production of other proinflammatory cytokines (including IL-6) was not. Similarly,
Gimeno and colleagues (2009) found that baseline IL-6 and CRP were predictive of 12-year change in the cognitive symptoms of depression; however, the effects were small (both
βs = 0.046) and, consequently, may only be detected in samples much larger than the present one.
In total, the available evidence suggests that relationship between depression and inflammation is bidirectional and complex. Although our findings indicate that the depression-to-inflammation link might be stronger than the inflammation-to-depression link, it seems likely that the magnitude of either direction of this association may depend on other factors, such as the depressive symptom clusters examined, the inflammatory markers assessed, and the populations studied. For instance, our results, as well as those of
Kiecolt-Glaser et al. (2003) and
Gimeno et al. (2009), suggest that the cognitive-affective symptoms of depression may be weakly or not related to changes in IL-6 or CRP over time. Our findings additionally indicate that the somatic-vegetative symptoms may be significantly related to longitudinal increases in these inflammatory markers. Of note, because only the cognitive-affective symptoms of depression were assessed in the two previous studies (
Gimeno et al., 2009;
Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 2003), those results cannot help to evaluate this latter possibility. Considering the mechanisms thought to account for the influence of depression on immune system function, one might also expect depression to be a stronger predictor of inflammatory markers more proximal to the HPA axis and the autonomic nervous system (e.g., proinflammatory cytokines) than those more distal (e.g., acute-phase reactants). This is the pattern of results observed in our sample, as well as in a recent meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies examining the associations between depression and IL-1 (
d = 0.35), IL-6 (
d = 0.25), and CRP (
d = 0.15) (
Howren et al., 2009).
With respect to the populations studied, it is possible that the inflammation-to-depression link is stronger and, therefore, more likely to be detected in patient versus community samples. Although
van den Biggelaar and colleagues’ (2007) investigation was a population-based study of adults aged 85 years and older, it is reasonable to characterize their cohort as a patient sample, as approximately 85% of the participants had a history of chronic disease when arthritis is included (
Mass et al., 2009). In the other study that detected an inflammation-to-depression association (
Gimeno et al., 2009), the cohort consisted of generally healthy adults; however, the effects of IL-6 and CRP on change in the cognitive symptoms of depression were small (albeit significant due to the large sample size). Altogether, these findings raise the possibility that the elevations in inflammatory markers observed among healthy adults (like the present sample) may be too slight to induce measurable changes in depression, except in large samples. This may not be the case among patients with chronic diseases. Examination of baseline CRP levels of the existing studies supports this notion, as the level reported by van den Biggelaar et al. (median = 4.0 mg/L) is more than twice that observed in Gimeno and colleagues’ study (
M = 0.8–0.9 mg/L) and in our investigation (
M = 2.2 mg/L). Because these ideas are speculative, future prospective studies of community and patient samples, with repeated measures of both depressive symptom clusters and multiple inflammatory markers, are needed to determine whether the depression-inflammation relationship is moderated by the aforementioned factors.
Because little is known about predictors of longitudinal changes in inflammatory marker, several results not central to our objective are worth noting. Of all the control variables, only baseline BMI was a predictor of IL-6 and CRP change, which supports the notion that increased body mass promotes systemic inflammation (
Visser et al., 1999). Consistent with a recent review (
Nazmi and Victora, 2007), we also found that education level, a marker of socioeconomic status, was inversely associated with IL-6 change. We were surprised by the number of nonsignificant paths, given that all of the selected biomedical and behavioral factors had been previously associated with IL-6 or CRP levels in cross-sectional analyses. The lack of longitudinal associations for most of these factors raises the possibility that some may be a consequence of inflammation instead of a cause. Similar to our results,
Kiecolt-Glaser and colleagues (2003) reported that factors cross-sectionally associated with inflammatory markers (e.g., gender and ethnicity) did not predict 6-year change in IL-6. Unlike the present study, however, these researchers found that alcohol consumption was positively related and exercise was inversely related to IL-6 change. We also found that baseline carotid intima-media thickness was not a predictor of IL-6 or CRP change. This finding is inconsistent with the risk marker model (
Pearson et al., 2003), which proposes that basal inflammatory marker level merely reflects the extent of underlying atherosclerosis.
Although our investigation has many strengths, such as the longitudinal design and the simultaneous evaluation of both directions of the depression-inflammation relationship, there are some important limitations. First, because our sample consisted of healthy volunteers, the range of BDI-II scores was somewhat restricted, which may have resulted in the underestimation of effect sizes of the relationships involving depression. Second, we obtained only a single measurement of depressive symptoms and each inflammatory marker at baseline and follow-up. Due to the within-person variation of depressive symptoms (
Beck et al., 1988) and inflammatory markers (
Sakkinen et al., 1999), the reliability of our baseline and follow-up estimates would have been enhanced had we obtained and averaged two separate measurements at both time points (
Pearson et al., 2003). However, in many of the epidemiologic studies demonstrating a link between depressive symptoms or inflammatory markers and cardiovascular risk, estimates of baseline level were also based on just one measurement (
Cesari et al., 2003;
Luc et al., 2003;
Pradhan et al., 2002;
Ridker et al., 2008;
Suls and Bunde, 2005). Third, we included only two waves of data, baseline and 6-year follow-up, in our analyses. In the PHHP, depressive symptoms and inflammatory markers were also assessed at a 3-year follow-up. Unfortunately, due to a clerical error, the BDI-II instructions given at year three (rate your symptom severity during the past two weeks) were not identical to those given at the baseline and year six (rate your symptom severity during the past week). Although including a third wave of data is preferable in most situations, in this instance it would have reduced our confidence in the results, given that we would have been unable to determine whether changes in depressive symptom severity from baseline to year three and from year three to year six were due to true growth or a modification to the scale. Finally, because our sample consisted of only 35 (13.3%) non-white adults, our findings may not generalize to other racial or ethic groups.
In summary, we have shown that depressive symptoms precede and predict subsequent increases in serum IL-6, a CAD-relevant inflammatory marker, among healthy, older adults. Our results imply that (a) depression may lead to augmented inflammation and that (b) inflammation may be one of the mechanisms that accounts for the deleterious effect of depression on cardiovascular health. The present findings also lead us to speculate that anti-inflammatory approaches may be an effective avenue to reduce the excessive CAD morbidity and mortality of individuals with clinical depression or elevated depressive symptoms.