Ruboxistaurin was initially touted as a PKCβ selective inhibitor, although our analysis suggested equal selectively towards PKCα and PKCβ, and likely even PKCγ. While this observation does not singularly implicate PKCα as the primary biologic target for ruboxistaurin in mediating cardioprotection, a stronger case emerges when various points of datum are collectively analyzed. For example, we observed that another PKC inhibitor with selectivity for the conventional PKC isoforms, Ro-31-8220, enhanced cardiac contractility in mice and restored ventricular function in a mouse model of dilated cardiomyopathy.
5 Similarly, a third conventional PKC isoform inhibitor, Ro-32-0432, also increased cardiac function in 2 different mouse models of heart failure, and more importantly, it did not increase contractility in
PKCα−/− mice.
5 While each of these pharmacologic inhibitors can have non-selective effects on other kinases, such as a known effect of ruboxistaurin on PDK1,
36 that all three have an identical effect on enhancing cardiac contractility and antagonizing heart failure strongly suggests it is the commonality in blocking conventional PKC isoforms that is mechanistically important. Indeed, acute infusion of PMA, a broad acting PKC activator, reduced cardiac contractility in Wt but not
PKCα−/− isolated hearts in an
ex vivo preparation.
5 Here we extended the case even further by showing that acute infusion of ruboxistaurin augmented cardiac contractility in wildtype and
PKCβγ−/− mice, but not
PKCα−/− mice. More importantly, ruboxistaurin protected
PKCβγ−/− mice from heart failure and death following pressure overload stimulation, unequivocally demonstrating that this drug is not mediating cardioprotection by inhibition of PKCβ or γ. These results strongly suggest that the contractile and cardioprotective effects of ruboxstaurin are mediated through inhibition of PKCα.
The various pharmacologic studies discussed above are further buttressed by various genetic or gene therapy-based experiments. For example, deletion of
PKCα in mice enhanced cardiac contractility and protected from heart failure.
19 Transgene-mediated expression of dominant negative PKCα in a cardiac myocyte-specific manner similarly increased contractility and protected from heart failure.
21 Moreover, adenoviral mediated gene transfer of dominant negative PKCα into a rat model of heart failure improved function.
5 Finally, overexpression of wildtype PKCα reduced cardiac function and led to heart failure.
19 By comparison, loss of
PKCβ or
PKCγ, or both together, did not enhance cardiac Ca
2+ handling nor was it cardioprotective after injury. In fact, loss of
PKCβγ resulted in slightly lower Ca
2+ levels in the SR, which may be anti-arrhythmic. Collectively, these various lines of evidence further implicate PKCα as the main target of ruboxistaurin responsible for the cardioprotective effects observed here.
PKCα protein levels and activity are increased in end-stage heart failure.
6,7,10,11–13,23 While PKCβ is also activated in heart failure, it appears to function completely different from PKCα in affecting cardiac disease states. For example,
PKCβ−/− mice were not protected from pressure overload or MI-induced heart failure, similar to
PKCγ−/− mice ( and data not shown). PKCβ overexpressing transgenic mice were reported to be protected from remodeling post MI, suggesting that increased PKCβ activity could even be protective to the heart,
16 although this interpretation is somewhat incongruent with the more recent observation that
PKCβ−/− mice show less injury after acute ischemia-reperfusion.
18 PKCβ overexpressing transgenic mice were also shown to have increased contractility and an increase in the amplitude of the Ca
2+ transient,
17 a phenotype that is opposite of PKCα, which negatively regulates contractility and the amplitude of the Ca
2+ transient. We also observed that
PKCβγ double null mice faired slightly worse after pressure overload or MI injury, suggesting that PKCβγ together might have a protective role in the heart. Thus, it is fairly certain that despite their sequence similarity and membership within the conventional subfamily, PKCα and PKCβ have different biologic functions in the heart.
While deletion of PKCβ and PKCγ appeared to negatively impact the heart, the inhibitory effect of ruboxistaurin towards PKCβ and PKCγ may not be overly concerning, as inhibiting PKCα clearly predominates in providing protection to the heart. The protective effects of ruboxistaurin are likely mediated through a mild enhancement in cardiac contractility in a myocyte autonomous manner given our previous work with transgenic mice, gene-deleted mice, and isolated heart and adult myocyte work.
5,19,21 However, it remains possible that the cardioprotective effects of this drug involves non-myocytes and endocrine effects from outside the heart. Regardless of the mechanism, we believe that ruboxistaurin is an attractive agent to apply to the heart failure clinical setting, especially given its apparent safety in late phase clinical trials.
34One final issue is how PKCα inhibition mechanistically attenuates heart failure. We showed previously that PKCα directly phosphorylates I-1, resulting in altered PP1 activity, which in turn regulates PLN phosphorylation. Alterations in PLN phosphorylation regulate SERCA2 function in the heart, which controls Ca
2+ loading and the magnitude of the Ca
2+ transient.
24 Here we observed a similar enhancement in PLN phosphorylation at serine-16 in
PKCα−/−, but not
PKCβγ−/− hearts. Thus, pharmacologic inhibition of PKCα activity would function at the level of SR Ca
2+ handling to augment contractility. Such an enhancement in contractility through SR Ca
2+ loading can be beneficial to the heart in the face of insults that promote heart failure.
37 For example, deletion or inhibition of PLN dramatically increases ventricular and myocyte cellular performance and reduces or prevents cardiomyopathy in diverse models of disease.
37 Adenoviral-mediated overexpression of SERCA2 in cardiac pressure overloaded rats also rescued heart failure and improved survival.
37 Thus, PKCα inhibition represents an enzymatic approach towards achieving greater contractility through an SR-dependent mechanism, which could benefit heart failure susceptibility to select insults. Alternatively, it is also possible that inhibition of PKCα enhances cardiac contractility through a mechanism involving the phosphorylation status of select myofilament proteins.
23 Such a mechanism could also be cardioprotective by simply enhancing the efficiency of myofilament function. Finally, it remains possible that inhibition of PKCα is cardioprotective through other unknown mechanisms. Regardless of the mechanism, our current data strongly suggest that PKC inhibitors, such as ruboxistaurin, should be evaluated in heart failure patients.