PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Immunol Lett. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 August 15.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2747358
NIHMSID: NIHMS130905

IgM in Microbial Infections: Taken for Granted?

Abstract

Much has been learned about the structure, function, and production of IgM, since the antibody's initial characterization. It is widely accepted that IgM provides a first line of defense during microbial infections, prior to the generation of adaptive, high affinity IgG responses that are important for long-lived immunity and immunological memory. Although IgM responses are commonly used as a measure of exposure to infectious diseases, it is perhaps surprising that the role of and requirement for IgM in many microbial infections has not been well explored in vivo. This is in part due to the lack of capabilities, until relatively recently, to evaluate the requirement for IgM in the absence of coincident IgG responses. Such evaluations are now possible, using gene-targeted mouse strains that produce only IgM, or isotype-switched IgG. A number of studies have revealed that IgM, produced either innately, or in response to antigen challenge, plays an important and perhaps underappreciated role in many microbial infections. Moreover, the characterization of the roles of various B cell subsets, in the production of IgM, and in host defense, has revealed important and divergent roles for B-1a and B-1b cells. This review will highlight studies in which IgM, in its own right, has been found to play an important role, not only in early immunity, but also in long-term protection, against a variety of microbial pathogens. Observations that long-lived IgM responses can be generated in vivo suggest that it may be feasible to target IgM production as part of vaccination strategies.

Keywords: IgM, microbial infection, B-1 cell

Properties of IgM important for microbial immunity

The characteristics and functions of IgM have been reviewed widely, and have been well documented (for review, see [1]). Many properties of IgM make this immunoglobulin particularly well-suited to its role in microbial immunity. It is present in high concentrations in blood (in the range of 1.5mg/ml), and is the first antibody elicited in an immune response following immunization or infection. IgM has a relatively short half-life in the serum, approximately 28 hours, in normal mice in the absence of antigen [2]. Thus, it is generally assumed that the production of IgM wanes, once B cell responses mature. However, some recent evidence, including our own, suggests that this is not always be the case, and demonstrates that IgM responses can be maintained for long periods following infection or immunization, perhaps due to long-lived B cells (discussed below).

Monomeric IgM (180,000 kDa) is expressed as membrane-bound antibody on all naive B cells, but it is secreted from B cells as a pentamer (five monomeric units held together by disulfide bonds that link the carboxy-terminal heavy chains and the J chain). The pentameric structure generates 10 linked antigen binding sites, affording IgM a higher valency than other immunoglobulins. IgM is generated from germline configured transcripts in B cells, prior to the onset of class switch recombination (CSR) and somatic hypermutation (SHM), and is typically of low affinity. However, its high valency can allow it bind to antigens with a wide range of avidities (10-3 to 10-11 M-1; average values range between 10-6 and 10-7 M-1) [3,4], and to cause agglutination or clumping, a process which facilitates the removal of foreign pathogens or antigens (e.g., viral particles). Indeed, IgM is 100 to 10,000 times more effective than IgG in mediating agglutination. Agglutination is considered to be a key component of the process of IgM-mediated virus neutralization, given that a single bound IgM can activate complement and lyse an erythrocyte, while a thousand or more IgG molecules are required [5].

High valency also allows IgM to be more efficient than other immunoglobulins at binding antigens with repeating epitopes, such as viral particles, DNA, red blood cells, and carbohydrates on pathogens or cell surfaces. Due to the low affinity and high valency of IgM, the majority of IgM are polyreactive; this latter property allows IgM to bind to a range of unrelated antigens [6-8]. Polyreactive antibodies recognize phylogenetically conserved structures, including nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates, and phospholipids [9,10]. Since these structures can occur in repetitive forms on some bacteria and viruses, polyreactive IgM on B cells can bind to antigenic determinants and induce antibody production independent of T cell help.

IgM is the primary humoral component elicited by T-independent (TI) antigens [11]. Classically, TI antigens have been defined as Type 1 or Type 2; at high concentrations, the former trigger polyclonal B cell responses via non-clonally distributed co-stimulatory receptors, such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs), in the absence of a classical second signal [12]. In contrast, TI-2 antigens are classified as highly repetitive structures, such as cell membrane polysaccharides and bacterial flagella, which can crosslink B cell receptors (BCRs) to induce an IgM response [12,13]. Limited amounts of IgM are produced against T cell-dependent antigens, and high-affinity isotype-switched antibodies are the hallmark of the T cell-dependent humoral response [11,14].

Both natural and immune IgM are important in host defense

There are now considered to be two classes of IgM, natural (or innate) IgM, and immune (or adaptive) IgM. Natural IgM is produced by innate-like B-1 cells in the absence of pathogen encounter, and immune IgM is produced by both innate-like B-1 and adaptive B-2 cells following antigen or pathogen encounter. Although the cellular sources of natural and immune IgM differ, only minimal differences in the molecular properties exist between natural and immune IgM. However, the former contain more flexible intrinsic antigen-binding sites that facilitate broad interactions with a variety of antigens [15-17]. Natural IgM has been found in both humans and mice, and constitutes the majority of total circulating IgM [18-20]. Natural IgM is generated largely in the absence of exogenous antigen exposure, given that it has been found in antigen-free mice and newborn humans [21-23]. The majority of natural antibodies are polyreactive, and bind to a number of different antigens with low affinity (Kd=10-4 to 10-7 M).

However, a small percentage exhibit characteristics of monoreactive antibodies that recognize fewer antigens, but with higher affinity (Kd: 10-7 to 10-11 M). The former class of IgM are germline-encoded, while somatic hypermutations can be detected in the latter [24]. Natural IgM is produced primarily by the CD5+ B-1a subset of B-1 cells that are generated during fetal and neonatal development [9,10,25], and are found primarily in the peritoneal and pleural cavities [9]. Natural antibodies are present at low titers in serum and contribute to early immunity prior to the onset of the adaptive humoral response [26,27]. Although natural antibodies were first described over 100 years ago [4], they were for a long time thought to recognize only self-antigens, and thus to be of little value for microbial immunity. However, within the past 20 years, a number of studies have documented that natural IgM can bind to a number of microbial pathogens [14,28-31].

An important advance that facilitated investigations of the role of natural IgM in vivo in B cell-sufficient mice was the generation of mice deficient for secretory IgM (sIgM). This mouse strain was generated by germline deletion of the μ chain secretory exon [30]. In sIgM-deficient mice, IgM is expressed on the cell membrane of B cells, but B cells are unable to secrete IgM, although they can undergo CSR and secrete IgG. Using the sIgM-deficient mice in a mouse model of acute septic peritonitis induced by cecal ligation and puncture, it was demonstrated that natural antibodies were required for protection against systemic bacterial infection [30]. Resistance to infection was restored when the sIgM-deficient mice were reconstituted with polyclonal IgM from normal mouse serum. These studies established that natural IgM can provide effective anti-microbial immunity. Examples of infections where IgM has been shown to provide a component of protective immunity in vivo are provided in Table 1, and several of the studies are described below.

Table I
Examples of pathogens where IgM has been demonstrated to play a protective role in vivo

Immune IgM, in contrast, is produced in conventional fashion primarily by spleen and lymph node B-2 cells, following antigenic exposure [32,33]. Recent studies have demonstrated that B-1b cells also contribute to the production of immune IgM in response to T-independent antigens [25,34,35]. B-1b cells are phenotypically similar to B-1a cells, although N-region diversity is often comparable to that of B-2 cells [36,37], suggesting that the properties of immune IgM produced by the two B cell subsets are similar.

IgM and immunity to viral infections

Although the presence of IgM has long been used as an important diagnostic tool for identifying individuals who have been exposed to viral pathogens, and although neutralizing IgM is generated against most viruses [38], the relevance of IgM for host defense in many viral infections has not been clearly defined in vivo. Consequently, several studies have begun to investigate roles for natural and immune IgM in viral immunity. Ochsenbein and colleagues demonstrated that natural antibodies specific for several viruses, including vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), and vaccinia virus, were present, albeit at low titers, in normal mouse serum [39]. Moreover, B cell-deficient mice lacking natural antibodies were more susceptible to VSV infection, and transfer of normal serum to B cell-deficient mice restored protection, revealing that natural antibodies can play an significant role in host defense against viral infections.

To begin to address the roles of various B cell subsets in the production of IgM during viral infection, Baumgarth and colleagues demonstrated that natural and immune IgM are produced by different subsets of B cells. Natural IgM production was found to be a principal function of B-1 cells, given that these cells maintained their function, and did not differentiate into immune IgM-producing B cells in vivo [33]. This finding was demonstrated using antibody-mediated cell ablation to generate chimeric mice containing B-1 and B-2 cells of different BALB/c-derived IgM allotypes. Although allotype-specific immune IgM was elicited from B-2 cells during infection, natural IgM was produced only by B-1 cells, and antibody production by the B-1 cells did not increase during infection. These initial studies of B-1 cells were extended by an investigation of the respective contributions of natural B-1-derived IgM and immune B-2 cell-derived IgM to host defense during influenza infection [31]. Natural antibody was found to be protective during mouse influenza infection, given that sIgM-deficient mice exhibited increased mortality following infection with influenza strain Mem71. To distinguish between possible roles for B-1- and B-2-derived IgM in immunity, the authors generated radiation-induced fetal liver and bone marrow chimeric mice. The experimental strategy was predicated on the observation that most B-1 cells are derived from fetal liver, and B-2 cells are derived from adult bone marrow. Using the chimeric mice, it was demonstrated that B-1 cells produced polyreactive IgM that bound to at least four different influenza strains, while B-2 cells secreted strain-specific immune IgM that exhibited minimal cross-reactivity [31]. Mice lacking either natural B-1-derived or immune B-2-derived IgM were as susceptible as mice lacking both sources of IgM, indicating that both natural and immune IgM contributed to immunity. Collectively, the studies demonstrated that B-1- and B-2 cell-derived IgM can provide independent components of the protective humoral immune response during influenza infection. Other related studies of influenza infection demonstrated that complement-dependent neutralizing natural IgM reactive to influenza virus PR8 was present in C57BL/6 mice, in the absence of infection, and could induce a modest degree of protection when administered to RAG1-deficient mice [40].

A role for IgM in host defense during influenza infection was also addressed using activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID)-deficient mice. AID is essential for both CSR and SHM [41], so mice lacking AID produce only IgM, and thus are a useful tool for investigation of the role of IgM in microbial immunity, without the confounding effect of coincident IgG. Harada and colleagues, using AID-deficient mice in studies of influenza infection, demonstrated that IgM was sufficient for protection against both primary and secondary infections with strain PR8 [42]. Unmutated IgM was sufficient to control viral replication, although efficient virus elimination ultimately required isotype-switched IgG. Although similar mortality rates were observed in wild-type and AID-deficient mice, the latter strain exhibited greater morbidity. Moreover, virus elimination was delayed during primary infection, and viral titers were higher during secondary infection in AID-deficient mice, likely due to the absence of IgG. Although high-affinity IgG clearly plays an important role in influenza immunity, the level of protection provided by IgM it was remarkable. In those studies, the authors were unable distinguish between natural and immune IgM, so both forms of IgM could have contributed to the protection.

In more recent studies, Baumgarth and colleagues investigated the roles of the B-1a and B-1b cell subsets in IgM-mediated immunity to influenza [43]. Although it had been generally accepted that B-1a cell production of natural IgM is systemic, the authors demonstrated that these cells can produce local IgM in response to infection. Antibody production was not a consequence of antigen-specific B-1a cell expansion, but rather, was due to the local accumulation of IgMhi/CD43+/CD138- B-1a cells in the lung-draining lymph nodes, probably in response to infection-driven inflammatory signals. The notion that B-1a cells can migrate in response to inflammatory signals gained support from studies by Yang and colleagues, who demonstrated that peritoneal B-1a cells could migrate to the spleen following LPS administration, in some cases without undergoing cell division [44]. These studies together highlight the fact that B-1a cells are not passive IgM-producing cells, but can play an active role in microbial immunity, even though they do not undergo clonal expansion in vivo.

IgM has also been demonstrated to play important roles in host defense against other viral infections. Diamond and colleagues examined the role of IgM in protection against West Nile Virus (WNV) infection [32]. Here, the authors also used the sIgM-deficient mice to demonstrate that immune IgM can protect mice against lethal WNV infection by limiting viremia and spread of infection [32]. T cell-independent immune IgM has also shown to play a role in protection against polyoma virus [45], and VSV [13,46]. Together, these studies suggest that IgM plays a larger role in immunity to viral infections than has been generally appreciated; thus, it is possible that a protective role for IgM in vivo has often been overlooked in a studies of other viral infections.

IgM and immunity to extracellular bacterial pathogens

An important protective role for IgM has also been demonstrated in several extracellular bacterial infections, including those caused by Borrelia and Streptococcus. Relapsing fever is caused by a number of Borrelia species, including B. hermsii, B. recurrentis, and B. duttonii [47]. A hallmark of relapsing fever is the recurrent episodes of high bacteremia in the blood (~108 bacteria/mL) [48], which are rapidly cleared within 2-4 days after the emergence of novel antigenic variants [48]. IgM is a major antibody sub-class that generates immunity to Borrelia duttonii [49,50], and studies of patient-derived relapsing fever Borrelia demonstrated a protective function for both polyclonal and monoclonal IgM [51,52]. Other findings suggested that both B-1 cells and marginal zone (MZ) B cells were primary participants in the humoral immune response during B. hermsii infection [34,53], supporting a role for IgM during this infection [54]. Studies by Alugupalli and colleagues investigated IgM immunity using sIgM-deficient mice; they demonstrated that T cell-independent IgM was required for immunity to B. hermsii [34]. Evidence from studies of xid mice, which have a point mutation in Bruton's tyrosine kinase (Btk), and are severely deficient in B-1b cells, suggested that the B-1b cell subset is essential for host defense [34]. Accordingly, the B-1b subset was determined to be the major source of protective IgM, given that these cells underwent selective expansion during infection. Later studies from Alugupalli and colleagues demonstrated that the B-1b cell derived IgM recognized complement factor H-binding protein (FhbA), a B. hermsii outer surface protein and putative virulence factor that does not undergo antigen variation [55].

IgM is also crucial for host defense against a related species, B. burgdoferi, the etiologic agent of Lyme disease. Although B. burgdoferi is generally considered to be an extracellular pathogen, a number of in vitro studies demonstrated that the spirochete can bind and invade endothelial cells, fibroblasts, macrophages, Kupffer cells, and synovial cells [56]. Nevertheless, antibody-mediated clearance of the pathogen occurs largely in the blood and intracellular survival sequesters the spirochetes as an immune evasion strategy [56]. Initial studies demonstrated that passive immunization with IgM and IgG, independent of T cell help, conferred protection against B. burgdoferi; however, the contribution of the individual subclasses was not addressed [57,58]). Belperron and colleagues investigated the potential contribution of natural antibodies in preventing the dissemination of the spirochete. A five-fold increase in the pathogen DNA levels in the blood was detected in B cell-deficient mice, compared to wild-type controls, and was reduced when polyclonal IgM was transferred prior to tick feeding [59]. Later studies demonstrated that marginal zone B cells are critical for the generation of immune IgM. Antibody-depletion of marginal zone B cells lead to reduced Borrelia-specific IgM titers, and increased pathogen burden in the blood [60]. Collectively, these studies indicate not only that IgM, in the absence of IgG and T cells, can play a major role in controlling Borrelia infection, but also that B-1b cells are an important source of immune IgM during extracellular bacterial infection.

IgM has also been demonstrated to be effective during Streptococcus pneumoniae infection, S. pneumoniae, an encapsulated extracellular gram-positive bacterium, causes a number of conditions, including otitis media, pneumonia, septicemia, and meningitis [61]. During the early 1980s, it was demonstrated that natural antibodies specific for bacterial phosphocholine (of the T15-idiotype) could protect naïve hosts from S. pneumoniae infection [28]. Later studies demonstrated that higher bacterial loads were higher in sIgM-deficient and C1q-deficient mice than in wild-type controls [62]. Because natural IgM is essential for immunity to S. pneumoniae infection, the function of B-1 cells was investigated with the use of CD19-deficient mice, which exhibit modest T cell-dependent responses, and impaired production of natural antibodies [63,64]. Impaired natural antibody production was due to the loss of the B-1a subset, which was responsible for polysaccharide-specific IgM [25]. CD19-deficient mice were more susceptible than wild-type mice to S. pneumoniae infection, indicating a requirement for natural IgM in host defense. In the same study, the authors also utilized a human CD19-overexpressing transgenic mouse, which, in contrast to the CD19-deficient strain, maintained B-1a cells and natural antibodies; these mice were protected from infection. However, immunization of the CD19-deficient mice generated long-lived protective IgM from B-1b cells, indicating that the B-1b subset was required for production of immune IgM. Thus, during Streptococcus infection, B-1a cells are responsible for the production of natural IgM, and B-1b cells produce immune IgM in response to pathogen encounter. The above work was important not only in that it highlighted a major role for IgM in host defense, but also in that it proposed that natural and immune IgM are produced from different B-1 cell subsets, i.e., the B-1a and B-1b cells, respectively.

IgM immunity during intracellular bacterial infections

The studies of IgM described above were performed on viruses and extracellular bacteria. Antibodies, for a long time, had not been considered to play a role in protection against intracellular bacteria, although research in the past several years has demonstrated that antibodies can provide an important component of immunity against some intracellular bacteria and other intracellular pathogens [65]. The emphasis in most studies has been on a role for IgG in host defense [66], but there is increasing evidence that IgM can also provide a component of protective immunity in such infections. For example, IgM has been documented to provide immunity against the facultative intracellular bacterium, Nocardia brasiliensis. The bacterium causes a chronic infectious disease known as actinomycetoma, which is characterized by swelling, abcesses and ulcers that discharge microcolonies at the site of infection. [67,68]. Serum obtained from mice immunized with N. brasiliensis antigens contained high titers of IgM, and conferred protection in uninfected hosts by preventing bacterial dissemination [69]. Protection was not achieved when IgG was transferred into infected mice, and isotype utilization analyses demonstrated that the protective sera primarily contained polyreactive antigen-specific IgM.

Antibodies also exhibited efficacy during infection with Franciscella tularensis, another facultative intracellular bacterium. Several groups have supported a role for antibodies in protection against attenuated strains of F. tularensis [70-73], although a specific role for IgM was not addressed in detail in those studies. IgM responses were induced following F. tularensis infection in mice [74], however, and other studies demonstrated that T cell-independent immunity was effective [75]. Immunization with purified F. tularensis LPS induced predominantly IgM responses that was associated with protection against the live vaccine strain LVS [71,76,77]. In a related study, F. tularensis LPS-mediated protection was attributed to B-1a-derived IgM, based on the fact that wild-type, but not xid mice, were protected from fatal LVS infection [78]. These data, and the observation that LPS immunization was associated with an early robust B-1a response within the spleen [78], revealed that B-1-derived IgM can be highly effective against F. tularensis, once again underscoring the importance of this B cell subset and IgM in adaptive immunity. The latter study by Cole and colleagues, identifying B-1a cells as a source of immune IgM, stands in contrast with the studies described above that highlight a role for B-1b cells in immune IgM-mediated protection, suggesting that B-1 cell subsets can play differing roles in infections by different pathogens.

Our own work has focused on humoral immunity during infection by intracellular bacteria of the genus Ehrlichia. The ehrlichiae are tick-born rickettsial pathogens that cause a number of serious diseases in both humans and other mammals. Our earlier studies demonstrated that outer membrane protein-specific antibodies are highly protective in both immunodeficient and immunocompetent mice [79,80]. Those studies focused largely on the role of high affinity IgG [80]. Using a heterologous ehrlichial immunization model, we also demonstrated that antibody-mediated cross-protection against fatal ehrlichial challenge infection can be achieved independent of CD4 T cells [81]. This finding led us to focus on a possible role for IgM in protective immunity. As part of these studies, we identified a major population of CD11b-positive, CD5-negative, CD11c-expressing B cells plasmablasts that were responsible for the CD4 T cell-independent production of antigen-specific IgM within the spleen, during peak ehrlichial infection [82]. The appearance of the CD11c-expressing B cell population also coincided with a robust serum IgM response. We used AID-deficient mice and sIgM-deficient mice, to address the respective contributions of IgM and IgG, to protection against challenge following heterologous infection/immunization. Both gene-targeted strains were protected against fatal challenge infection, revealing that either IgM or IgG is sufficient for immunity (RR, GW, unpublished data). We have not yet determined the subset of B cell responsible for protection, although the cell surface phenotype, as well as the presence of an IgM response in splenectomized mice, suggests that B-1b cells, but not MZ B cells, are involved (RR, GW, unpublished data; [82]). These data together indicate that IgM can also be a major component of host defense against intracellular bacteria, even though the intracellular niche occupied by intracellular pathogens is often thought to preclude protective humoral immunity. Since there is limited evidence that antibodies can access bacteria while inside host cells, an alternative explanation is that encounter occurs during transfer of the bacteria from cell to cell [83].

IgM and long-term immunity

IgM-mediated immunity is usually considered to be transient, and therefore of little value for protection against re-infection. However, several recent studies have begun to challenge this notion. In their studies of B. hermsii immunity, Alugupalli and colleagues demonstrated that B-1b cells can provide long-term T cell-independent immunity against re-infection. Protection was due to immune IgM, given that it was generated in AID-deficient mice, and was associated with the expansion and persistence of B-1b cells within the peritoneal cavity for at least as long as 230 days post-infection [84]. IgM production was not constitutive, however, but was induced following re-infection, indicating that the response was due to a memory cell response, not persistent antibody. This finding has provided important evidence that IgM can be produced during re-infection by memory B-1 cells, although the candidate memory cells have not yet been characterized in detail. The idea that peritoneal B-1 cells can contribute to long term protective immunity was also supported by the studies of adaptive B-1b responses elicited during S. pneumoniae infection by Haas and colleagues, described above [25]. In that study, B-1b-mediated adaptive IgM immunity was maintained for at least as long as 10 weeks post-infection. In our studies of ehrlichial immunity, we have also observed long-term humoral immunity: serum IgM responses and antibody-mediated protection against virulent ehrlichial challenge infection were observed for as long as 150 days post-immunization (RR, GW, unpublished data). In their study of B1 responses following F. tularensis LPS vaccination, Cole and colleagues [78] found that IgM responses were persistent, and also provided long-term protection against the F. tularensis LVS. IgM levels remained detectable for as long as 70 days post-immunization, although the candidate IgM-producing cells were no longer detected, leaving open the question as to the cellular origin of the long-term protective IgM.

The above studies together suggest the existence of multiple B cell subsets and mechanisms responsible for the maintenance of long-lived protective IgM responses (Figure 1). Hsu and colleagues reported that B-1b cells elicited in response to (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)-acetyl (NP)-Ficoll generated a population of long-lived extrafollicular IgM–secreting plasmablasts [35]' such a mechanism for the maintenance of IgM could also be relevant during infections. In the study by Hsu and colleagues, long-term antibody production was not maintained by newly generated naive B cells, although such a mechanism could perhaps support long-term IgM production during chronic infections. Finally, natural antibody-producing B1 cells could also contribute to the maintenance of long-term IgM. Implicit in the notion that IgM immunity can be maintained by long-lived cells is the possibility that memory B cells and/or long-lived plasmablasts can be generated from B-1 cell subsets following vaccination. Such strategies could involve the use of co-adjuvants, allowing specific targeting of B-1 cell subsets via innate lymphocyte receptors [85].

Figure 1
Possible mechanisms that would support long-term maintenance of IgM

Concluding Remarks

Although IgM responses have often been “taken for granted” as a source of transient immunity prior to onset of high-affinity IgG, the studies summarized in this review suggest that IgM plays a more important role in microbial infections than has been generally appreciated. The unique properties of IgM allow this immunoglobulin to be highly effective in the prevention and in the elimination of diverse types of microbial infections. Thus, the potential exists to better utilize IgM for prevention and treatment of infections, through immunization and/or passive antibody administration. It is now clear that a major source of both natural and immune IgM is from specialized subsets of B-1 cells, but much remains to be learned regarding the origins, development, and maintenance of B-1 responses. The knowledge gained from the study of such responses should aid in the development of vaccines designed to generate effective long-lived IgM immunity.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr. Marcy Blackman, Trudeau Institute, for critical reading of the manuscript. Work from our laboratory that was described in this review was supported by Public Service Grant R01 AI064678 to G.W. The authors have no conflicting financial interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Boes M. Role of natural and immune IgM antibodies in immune responses. Mol Immunol. 2000;37:1141–1149. [PubMed]
2. Vieira P, Rajewsky K. The half-lives of serum immunoglobulins in adult mice. Eur J Immunol. 1988;18:313–316. [PubMed]
3. Bendtzen K, Hansen MB, Ross C, Svenson M. High-avidity autoantibodies to cytokines. Immunol Today. 1998;19:209–211. [PubMed]
4. Notkins AL. Polyreactivity of antibody molecules. Trends Immunol. 2004;25:174–179. [PubMed]
5. Cooper NR, Nemerow GR, Mayes JT. Methods to detect and quantitate complement activation. Springer Semin Immunopathol. 1983;6:195–212. [PubMed]
6. Satoh J, Prabhakar BS, Haspel MV, Ginsberg-Fellner F, Notkins AL. Human monoclonal autoantibodies that react with multiple endocrine organs. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:217–220. [PubMed]
7. Prabhakar BS, Saegusa J, Onodera T, Notkins AL. Lymphocytes capable of making monoclonal autoantibodies that react with multiple organs are a common feature of the normal B cell repertoire. J Immunol. 1984;133:2815–2817. [PubMed]
8. Dighiero G, Lymberi P, Mazie JC, Rouyre S, Butler-Browne GS, Whalen RG, Avrameas S. Murine hybridomas secreting natural monoclonal antibodies reacting with self antigens. J Immunol. 1983;131:2267–2272. [PubMed]
9. Kantor AB, Herzenberg LA. Origin of murine B cell lineages. Annual Reviews Immunology. 1993;11:501. [PubMed]
10. Hardy RR, Hayakawa K. CD5 B cells, a fetal B cell lineage. Adv Immunol. 1994;55:297–339. [PubMed]
11. Mond JJ, Vos Q, Lees A, Snapper CM. T cell independent antigens. Curr Opin Immunol. 1995;7:349–354. [PubMed]
12. Vos Q, Lees A, Wu ZQ, Snapper CM, Mond JJ. B-cell activation by T-cell-independent type 2 antigens as an integral part of the humoral immune response to pathogenic microorganisms. Immunol Rev. 2000;176:154–170. [PubMed]
13. Fehr T, Naim HY, Bachmann MF, Ochsenbein AF, Spielhofer P, Bucher E, Hengartner H, Billeter MA, Zinkernagel RM. T-cell independent IgM and enduring protective IgG antibodies induced by chimeric measles viruses. Nat Med. 1998;4:945–948. [PubMed]
14. Ochsenbein AF, Zinkernagel RM. Natural antibodies and complement link innate and acquired immunity. Immunol Today. 2000;21:624–630. [PubMed]
15. Manivel V, Sahoo NC, Salunke DM, Rao KV. Maturation of an antibody response is governed by modulations in flexibility of the antigen-combining site. Immunity. 2000;13:611–620. [PubMed]
16. Wedemayer GJ, Patten PA, Wang LH, Schultz PG, Stevens RC. Structural insights into the evolution of an antibody combining site. Science. 1997;276:1665–1669. [PubMed]
17. Yin J, Beuscher AEt, Andryski SE, Stevens RC, Schultz PG. Structural plasticity and the evolution of antibody affinity and specificity. J Mol Biol. 2003;330:651–656. [PubMed]
18. Coutinho A, Kazatchkine MD, Avrameas S. Natural autoantibodies. Curr Opin Immunol. 1995;7:812–818. [PubMed]
19. Haury M, Sundblad A, Grandien A, Barreau C, Coutinho A, Nobrega A. The repertoire of serum IgM in normal mice is largely independent of external antigenic contact. Eur J Immunol. 1997;27:1557–1563. [PubMed]
20. Mouthon L, Nobrega A, Nicolas N, Kaveri SV, Barreau C, Coutinho A, Kazatchkine MD. Invariance and restriction toward a limited set of self-antigens characterize neonatal IgM antibody repertoires and prevail in autoreactive repertoires of healthy adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:3839–3843. [PubMed]
21. Avrameas S. Natural autoantibodies: from ‘horror autotoxicus’ to ‘gnothi seauton’ Immunol Today. 1991;12:154–159. [PubMed]
22. Casali P, Schettino EW. Structure and function of natural antibodies. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1996;210:167–179. [PubMed]
23. Pereira P, Forni L, Larsson EL, Cooper M, Heusser C, Coutinho A. Autonomous activation of B and T cells in antigen-free mice. Eur J Immunol. 1986;16:685–688. [PubMed]
24. Zhou ZH, Tzioufas AG, Notkins AL. Properties and function of polyreactive antibodies and polyreactive antigen-binding B cells. J Autoimmun. 2007;29:219–228. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Haas KM, Poe JC, Steeber DA, Tedder TF. B-1a and B-1b cells exhibit distinct developmental requirements and have unique functional roles in innate and adaptive immunity to S. pneumoniae. Immunity. 2005;23:7–18. [PubMed]
26. Ehrenstein MR, O'Keefe TL, Davies SL, Neuberger MS. Targeted gene disruption reveals a role for natural secretory IgM in the maturation of the primary immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:10089–10093. [PubMed]
27. Fearon DT, Locksley RM. The instructive role of innate immunity in the acquired immune response. Science. 1996;272:50–54. [PubMed]
28. Briles DE, Nahm M, Schroer K, Davie J, Baker P, Kearney J, Barletta R. Antiphosphocholine antibodies found in normal mouse serum are protective against intravenous infection with type 3 streptococcus pneumoniae. J Exp Med. 1981;153:694–705. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Gobet R, Cerny A, Ruedi E, Hengartner H, Zinkernagel RM. The role of antibodies in natural and acquired resistance of mice to vesicular stomatitis virus. Exp Cell Biol. 1988;56:175–180. [PubMed]
30. Boes M, Prodeus AP, Schmidt T, Carroll MC, Chen J. A critical role of natural immunoglobulin M in immediate defense against systemic bacterial infection. J Exp Med. 1998;188:2381–2386. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Baumgarth N, Herman OC, Jager GC, Brown LE, Herzenberg LA, Chen J. B-1 and B-2 cell-derived immunoglobulin M antibodies are nonredundant components of the protective response to influenza virus infection. J Exp Med. 2000;192:271–280. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Diamond MS, Sitati EM, Friend LD, Higgs S, Shrestha B, Engle M. A critical role for induced IgM in the protection against West Nile virus infection. J Exp Med. 2003;198:1853–1862. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Baumgarth N, Herman OC, Jager GC, Brown L, Herzenberg LA. Innate and acquired humoral immunities to influenza virus are mediated by distinct arms of the immune system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:2250–2255. [PubMed]
34. Alugupalli KR, Gerstein RM, Chen J, Szomolanyi-Tsuda E, Woodland RT, Leong JM. The resolution of relapsing fever borreliosis requires IgM and is concurrent with expansion of B1b lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2003;170:3819–3827. [PubMed]
35. Hsu MC, Toellner KM, Vinuesa CG, Maclennan IC. B cell clones that sustain long-term plasmablast growth in T-independent extrafollicular antibody responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:5905–5910. [PubMed]
36. Tornberg UC, Holmberg D. B-1a, B-1b and B-2 B cells display unique VHDJH repertoires formed at different stages of ontogeny and under different selection pressures. EMBO J. 1995;14:1680–1689. [PubMed]
37. Kantor AB, Merrill CE, Herzenberg LA, Hillson JL. An unbiased analysis of V(H)-D-J(H) sequences from B-1a, B-1b, and conventional B cells. J Immunol. 1997;158:1175–1186. [PubMed]
38. Zinkernagel RM, LaMarre A, Ciurea A, Hunziker L, Ochsenbein AF, McCoy KD, Fehr T, Bachmann MF, Kalinke U, Hengartner H. Neutralizing antiviral antibody responses. Adv Immunol. 2001;79:1–53. [PubMed]
39. Ochsenbein AF, Fehr T, Lutz C, Suter M, Brombacher F, Hengartner H, Zinkernagel RM. Control of early viral and bacterial distribution and disease by natural antibodies. Science. 1999;286:2156–2159. [PubMed]
40. Jayasekera JP, Moseman EA, Carroll MC. Natural antibody and complement mediate neutralization of influenza virus in the absence of prior immunity. J Virol. 2007;81:3487–3494. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Muramatsu M, Kinoshita K, Fagarasan S, Yamada S, Shinkai Y, Honjo T. Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell. 2000;102:553–563. [PubMed]
42. Harada Y, Muramatsu M, Shibata T, Honjo T, Kuroda K. Unmutated immunoglobulin M can protect mice from death by influenza virus infection. J Exp Med. 2003;197:1779–1785. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Choi YS, Baumgarth N. Dual role for B-1a cells in immunity to influenza virus infection. J Exp Med. 2008;205:3053–3064. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Yang Y, Tung JW, Ghosn EE, Herzenberg LA. Division and differentiation of natural antibody-producing cells in mouse spleen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:4542–4546. [PubMed]
45. Szomolanyi-Tsuda E, Brien JD, Dorgan JE, Garcea RL, Woodland RT, Welsh RM. Antiviral T-cell-independent type 2 antibody responses induced in vivo in the absence of T and NK cells. Virology. 2001;280:160–168. [PubMed]
46. Bachmann MF, Hengartner H, Zinkernagel RM. T helper cell-independent neutralizing B cell response against vesicular stomatitis virus: role of antigen patterns in B cell induction? Eur J Immunol. 1995;25:3445–3451. [PubMed]
47. Connolly SE, Benach JL. The versatile roles of antibodies in Borrelia infections. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3:411–420. [PubMed]
48. Barbour AG. Antigenic variation of surface proteins of Borrelia species. Rev Infect Dis. 1988;10 2:S399–402. [PubMed]
49. Arimitsu Y, Akama K. Characterization of protective antibodies produced in mice infected with Borrelia duttonii. Jpn J Med Sci Biol. 1973;26:229–237. [PubMed]
50. Yokota M, Morshed MG, Nakazawa T, Konishi H. Protective activity of Borrelia duttonii-specific immunoglobulin subclasses in mice. J Med Microbiol. 1997;46:675–680. [PubMed]
51. Connolly SE, Benach JL. Cutting edge: the spirochetemia of murine relapsing fever is cleared by complement-independent bactericidal antibodies. J Immunol. 2001;167:3029–3032. [PubMed]
52. Connolly SE, Thanassi DG, Benach JL. Generation of a complement-independent bactericidal IgM against a relapsing fever Borrelia. J Immunol. 2004;172:1191–1197. [PubMed]
53. Belperron AA, Dailey CM, Bockenstedt LK. Infection-induced marginal zone B cell production of Borrelia hermsii-specific antibody is impaired in the absence of CD1d. J Immunol. 2005;174:5681–5686. [PubMed]
54. Barbour AG, Bundoc V. In vitro and in vivo neutralization of the relapsing fever agent Borrelia hermsii with serotype-specific immunoglobulin M antibodies. Infect Immun. 2001;69:1009–1015. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Colombo MJ, Alugupalli KR. Complement factor H-binding protein, a putative virulence determinant of Borrelia hermsii, is an antigenic target for protective B1b lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2008;180:4858–4864. [PubMed]
56. Embers ME, Ramamoorthy R, Philipp MT. Survival strategies of Borrelia burgdorferi, the etiologic agent of Lyme disease. Microbes and infection / Institut Pasteur. 2004;6:312–318. [PubMed]
57. Barthold SW, Bockenstedt LK. Passive immunizing activity of sera from mice infected with Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun. 1993;61:4696–4702. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
58. McKisic MD, Redmond WL, Barthold SW. Cutting edge: T cell-mediated pathology in murine Lyme borreliosis. J Immunol. 2000;164:6096–6099. [PubMed]
59. Belperron AA, Bockenstedt LK. Natural antibody affects survival of the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi within feeding ticks. Infect Immun. 2001;69:6456–6462. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
60. Belperron AA, Dailey CM, Booth CJ, Bockenstedt LK. Marginal zone B-cell depletion impairs murine host defense against Borrelia burgdorferi infection. Infect Immun. 2007;75:3354–3360. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
61. Wuorimaa T, Kayhty H. Current state of pneumococcal vaccines. Scand J Immunol. 2002;56:111–129. [PubMed]
62. Brown JS, Hussell T, Gilliland SM, Holden DW, Paton JC, Ehrenstein MR, Walport MJ, Botto M. The classical pathway is the dominant complement pathway required for innate immunity to Streptococcus pneumoniae infection in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:16969–16974. [PubMed]
63. Engel P, Zhou LJ, Ord DC, Sato S, Koller B, Tedder TF. Abnormal B lymphocyte development, activation, and differentiation in mice that lack or overexpress the CD19 signal transduction molecule. Immunity. 1995;3:39–50. [PubMed]
64. Rickert RC, Rajewsky K, Roes J. Impairment of T-cell-dependent B-cell responses and B-1 cell development in CD19-deficient mice. Nature. 1995;376:352–355. [PubMed]
65. Casadevall A. Antibody-mediated immunity against intracellular pathogens: Two-dimensional thinking comes full circle. Infect Immun. 2003;71:4225–4228. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. Li JS, Chu F, Reilly A, Winslow GM. Antibodies highly effective in SCID mice during infection by the intracellular bacterium Ehrlichia chaffeensis are of picomolar affinity and exhibit preferential epitope and isotype utilization. J Immunol. 2002;169:1419–1425. [PubMed]
67. Welsh O, Vera-Cabrera L, Salinas-Carmona MC. Mycetoma. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25:195–202. [PubMed]
68. Salinas-Carmona MC. Nocardia brasiliensis: from microbe to human and experimental infections. Microbes and infection / Institut Pasteur. 2000;2:1373–1381. [PubMed]
69. Salinas-Carmona MC, Perez-Rivera I. Humoral immunity through immunoglobulin M protects mice from an experimental actinomycetoma infection by Nocardia brasiliensis. Infect Immun. 2004;72:5597–5604. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
70. Drabick JJ, Narayanan RB, Williams JC, Leduc JW, Nacy CA. Passive protection of mice against lethal Francisella tularensis (live tularemia vaccine strain) infection by the sera of human recipients of the live tularemia vaccine. Am J Med Sci. 1994;308:83–87. [PubMed]
71. Fulop M, Mastroeni P, Green M, Titball RW. Role of antibody to lipopolysaccharide in protection against low- and high-virulence strains of Francisella tularensis. Vaccine. 2001;19:4465–4472. [PubMed]
72. Stenmark S, Lindgren H, Tarnvik A, Sjostedt A. Specific antibodies contribute to the host protection against strains of Francisella tularensis subspecies holarctica. Microb Pathog. 2003;35:73–80. [PubMed]
73. Kirimanjeswara GS, Olmos S, Bakshi CS, Metzger DW. Humoral and cell-mediated immunity to the intracellular pathogen Francisella tularensis. Immunol Rev. 2008;225:244–255. [PubMed]
74. Rhinehart-Jones TR, Fortier AH, Elkins KL. Transfer of immunity against lethal murine Francisella infection by specific antibody depends on host gamma interferon and T cells. Infect Immun. 1994;62:3129–3137. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
75. Elkins KL, Rhinehart-Jones T, Nacy CA, Winegar RK, Fortier AH. T-cell-independent resistance to infection and generation of immunity to Francisella tularensis. Infect Immun. 1993;61:823–829. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
76. Dreisbach VC, Cowley S, Elkins KL. Purified lipopolysaccharide from Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain (LVS) induces protective immunity against LVS infection that requires B cells and gamma interferon. Infect Immun. 2000;68:1988–1996. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
77. Savitt AG, Mena-Taboada P, Monsalve G, Benach JL. Francisella tularensis infection-derived monoclonal antibodies provide detection, protection, and therapy. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009;16:414–422. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
78. Cole LE, Yang Y, Elkins KL, Fernandez ET, Qureshi N, Shlomchik MJ, Herzenberg LA, Vogel SN. Antigen-specific B-1a antibodies induced by Francisella tularensis LPS provide long-term protection against F. tularensis LVS challenge. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 [PubMed]
79. Yager E, Bitsaktsis C, Nandi B, McBride JW, Winslow G. An essential role for humoral immunity during ehrlichia infection in immunocompetent mice. Infect Immun. 2005;73:8009–8016. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
80. Li JS, Yager E, Reilly M, Freeman C, Reddy GR, Chu FK, Winslow G. Outer membrane protein specific monoclonal antibodies protect SCID Mice from fatal infection by the obligate intracellular bacterial pathogen Ehrlichia chaffeensis. J Immunol. 2001;166:1855–1862. [PubMed]
81. Bitsaktsis C, Nandi B, Racine R, MacNamara KC, Winslow G. T-Cell-independent humoral immunity is sufficient for protection against fatal intracellular ehrlichia infection. Infect Immun. 2007;75:4933–4941. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
82. Racine R, Chatterjee M, Winslow GM. CD11c expression identifies a population of extrafollicular antigen-specific splenic plasmablasts responsible for CD4 T-independent antibody responses during intracellular bacterial infection. J Immunol. 2008;181:1375–1385. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
83. Li JS, Winslow G. Survival, replication, and antibody susceptibility of Ehrlichia chaffeensis outside of host cells. Infect Immun. 2003;71:4229–4237. see Commentary. [PubMed]Inf Immun. 4271:4225–4237.
84. Alugupalli KR, Leong JM, Woodland RT, Muramatsu M, Honjo T, Gerstein RM. B1b lymphocytes confer T cell-independent long-lasting immunity. Immunity. 2004;21:379–390. [PubMed]
85. Alugupalli KR, Akira S, Lien E, Leong JM. MyD88- and Bruton's tyrosine kinase-mediated signals are essential for T cell-independent pathogen-specific IgM responses. J Immunol. 2007;178:3740–3749. [PubMed]
86. Seiler P, Kalinke U, Rulicke T, Bucher EM, Bose C, Zinkernagel RM, Hengartner H. Enhanced virus clearance by early inducible lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus-neutralizing antibodies in immunoglobulin-transgenic mice. J Virol. 1998;72:2253–2258. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
87. Ochsenbein AF, Pinschewer DD, Odermatt B, Carroll MC, Hengartner H, Zinkernagel RM. Protective T cell-independent antiviral antibody responses are dependent on complement. J Exp Med. 1999;190:1165–1174. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
88. Elkins KL, Bosio CM, Rhinehart-Jones TR. Importance of B cells, but not specific antibodies, in primary and secondary protective immunity to the intracellular bacterium Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain. Infect Immun. 1999;67:6002–6007. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
89. Martin F, Oliver AM, Kearney JF. Marginal zone and B1 B cells unite in the early response against T-independent blood-borne particulate antigens. Immunity. 2001;14:617–629. [PubMed]
90. Fabrizio K, Groner A, Boes M, Pirofski LA. A human monoclonal immunoglobulin M reduces bacteremia and inflammation in a mouse model of systemic pneumococcal infection. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2007;14:382–390. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
91. Burns T, Abadi M, Pirofski LA. Modulation of the lung inflammatory response to serotype 8 pneumococcal infection by a human immunoglobulin m monoclonal antibody to serotype 8 capsular polysaccharide. Infect Immun. 2005;73:4530–4538. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
92. Mukherjee J, Nussbaum G, Scharff MD, Casadevall A. Protective and nonprotective monoclonal antibodies to Cryptococcus neoformans originating from one B cell. J Exp Med. 1995;181:405–409. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
93. Taborda CP, Casadevall A. Immunoglobulin M efficacy against Cryptococcus neoformans: mechanism, dose dependence, and prozone-like effects in passive protection experiments. J Immunol. 2001;166:2100–2107. [PubMed]
94. Paciorkowski N, Porte P, Shultz L, Rajan TV. B1 B lymphocytes play a critical role in host protection against lymphatic filarial parasites. J Exp Med. 2000;191:731–735. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
95. Rajan B, Ramalingam T, Rajan TV. Critical role for IgM in host protection in experimental filarial infection. J Immunol. 2005;175:1827–1833. [PubMed]
96. Couper KN, Roberts CW, Brombacher F, Alexander J, Johnson LL. Toxoplasma gondii-specific immunoglobulin M limits parasite dissemination by preventing host cell invasion. Infect Immun. 2005;73:8060–8068. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
97. Couper KN, Phillips RS, Brombacher F, Alexander J. Parasite-specific IgM plays a significant role in the protective immune response to asexual erythrocytic stage Plasmodium chabaudi AS infection. Parasite Immunol. 2005;27:171–180. [PubMed]