The primary finding of the current study is that deletion of the voltage-gated calcium channel CaV1.3 results in altered neuronal function within the amygdala. Specifically, we have demonstrated that LTP is significantly reduced in the amygdala of CaV1.3 knockout mice. In addition, we report that principal neurons in the BLA of CaV1.3 knockout mice exhibit enhanced excitability as measured by an increase in repetitive firing and a decrease in the post-burst AHP.
Our experiments using the horizontal slice preparation demonstrate that LTP induced by HFS of the afferent fibers of the EC is significantly reduced in mice that lack the Ca
V1.3 calcium channel. Importantly, the deficit in HFS LTP was observed in the absence of any alteration in basal synaptic transmission. Long-term potentiation in the amygdala is dependent upon activation of either NMDA receptors, L-type voltage gated calcium channels or both. The relative contribution of L-VGCCs to the induction of LTP in the amygdala appears dependent on the type of slice preparation, the specific stimulation protocol used to induce LTP and the afferents that are stimulated (
Sah et al., 2008). Specifically, LTP induced in horizontal slices using 2 bouts of 100Hz stimulation (1 sec duration; 30 sec apart) of the external capsule can be blocked by either NMDA receptor antagonists or calcium channel blockers such as nifedipine (
Drephal et al., 2006). Thus our results are consistent with the notion that the bulk of the LTP that is blocked by nifedipine is mediated by the L-type calcium channel Ca
V1.3. To limit our assumptions regarding which neuronal subpopulations (i.e. excitatory or inhibitory) were or were not impacted by the deletion of Ca
V1.3 we elected to use the horizontal slice preparation because LTP in this preparation can be induced without blocking inhibitory transmission (
Drephal et al., 2006). Thus, while it seems likely that the observed deficit in LTP reflects an alteration in calcium signaling postsynaptically, it is possible that deletion of Ca
V1.3 disrupts plasticity in inhibitory interneurons such that there is an increase in inhibition after LTP induction in the Ca
V1.3 knockout mice. In addition to permitting LTP induction in the absence of GABA antagonists, the EC of the horizontal slice preparation contains intact afferents from the hippocampus, perirhinal and entorhinal cortices (
von Bohlen und Halbach and Albrecht, 1998;
2002), brain regions critical for encoding contextual information (
Burwell, Saddoris, Bucci, and Wiig, 2004;
Kim and Fanselow, 1992) of the type with which Ca
V1.3 knockout mice are impaired in forming associations (
McKinney and Murphy, 2006).
Deletion of Ca
V1.3 did not significantly alter the passive membrane properties of the principle neurons in the BLA. We did not observe any statistically significant changes in resting membrane potential or input resistance in the Ca
V1.3 knockout mice. Similarly, there was no change in the spike threshold, height or half width of single action potentials recorded in Ca
V1.3 knockout BLA principle neurons. Neuronal excitability in the amygdala has been reported to be regulated by voltage-gated calcium channels. Repetitive firing in response to a prolonged depolarizing step is significantly increased in the presence of cadmium (
Faber et al., 2001;
Faber and Sah, 2002;
Gean and Shinnick-Gallagher, 1989;
Washburn and Moises, 1992). Consistent with these reports, we observed an increase in neuronal excitability as measured by a significant increase in the firing frequency and a decrease in the interspike interval in response to prolonged current steps in the Ca
V1.3 knockout mice. It is worth noting that although the difference in input resistance between wild-types and knockouts was not statistically significant, there was a trend toward a decrease in the Ca
V1.3 knockout mice. This modest decrease in input resistance would be predicted to result in less membrane depolarization in response to somatic current injection making our finding of increased excitability even more striking. At present we do not know the cellular mechanism that underlies this putative change in input resistance but it is not unreasonable to hypothesize that this may be a compensatory mechanism which would functionally oppose the increased neuronal excitability observed in the Ca
V1.3 knockout mice.
Previous reports have suggested that VGCC modulation of neuronal excitability is regulated at least in part by the AHP (
Faber et al., 2001;
Faber and Sah, 2002;
Gean and Shinnick- Gallagher, 1989;
Washburn and Moises, 1992). Indeed, the Ca
V1.3 knockout mice exhibited significant reductions in the overall area of the AHP as compared to wild-type littermates. Deletion of Ca
V1.3 significantly reduced the overall area of the AHP as well as the AHP amplitude measured at 1000 ms after current stimulus offset. We did not observe a significant change in the peak amplitude of the AHP and although there was a trend towards a difference, the AHP amplitude measured at 200 ms was not significantly different in Ca
V1.3 knockout mice. In addition, the AHP duration is significantly shorter in Ca
V1.3 knockout mice than in wild-type mice. Taken collectively we conclude that Ca
V1.3 is selectively involved in the generation of the sAHP.
Though significantly reduced, a residual AHP (measured by overall area and amplitude at 1000 ms) is present in the principal BLA neurons of Ca
V1.3 knockout mice. At present the calcium source for the residual AHP is not known. In the hippocampus, where the putative role that L-VGCCs play in sAHP generation has been studied in more detail, it appears that blockade of L-VGCCs with dihydropyridines does not completely abolish the underlying calcium-activated potassium current that underlies the sAHP (
Power et al., 2002;
Shah and Haylett, 2000;
Tanabe, Gahwiler, and Gerber, 1998). In these studies the residual calcium-activated potassium current might reflect the relatively poor blockade of L-VGCCs by dihydropyridines (
Helton, Xu, and Lipscombe, 2005;
Xu and Lipscombe, 2001). Clearly, in the present study this is not the case. One possibility is that the calcium source for the residual AHP is calcium influx through the other brain-expressed L-VGCC, Ca
V1.2. Although we have not examined the role of Ca
V1.2 in the generation of the sAHP in BLA principle neurons, we have recently demonstrated that deletion of Ca
V1.2 in CA1 pyramidal neurons within the hippocampus does not significantly reduce the sAHP while deletion of Ca
V1.3 reduced the sAHP by approximately 50% (
Kuo, McKinney, White, and Murphy, 2006).
Alternatively one might imagine that calcium from intracellular calcium stores may be responsible for the residual sAHP. In hippocampal pyramidal neurons, disruption of calcium-induced calcium release (CICR) from intracellular calcium stores has been shown to reduce s
IAHP—the current that underlies the AHP (
Borde, Bonansco, de Sevilla, Le Ray, and Buno, 2000;
Shah and Haylett, 2000;
Tanabe et al., 1998;
Torres, Arfken, and Andrade, 1996;
van de Vrede, Fossier, Baux, Joels, and Chameau, 2007). While similar experiments have not been carried out in projection neurons in the amygdala it has recently been reported that calcium released from intracellular stores in response to cholinergic stimulation does not activate calcium-activated potassium channels that give rise to the s
IAHP suggesting that CICR likely does not significantly contribute to the sAHP (
Power and Sah, 2008). In addition, it has recently been demonstrated that calcium loading of the endoplasmic reticulum in BLA projection neurons can be achieved with subthreshold depolarization and it has been suggested that this calcium influx is gated by Ca
V1.3 (
Power and Sah, 2005). Therefore if CICR is responsible for the residual sAHP, our data would suggest that the source of calcium that triggers the calcium release from internal stores does not require Ca
V1.3 and that the internal calcium stores can be replenished in the absence of Ca
V1.3.
A final explanation for the residual sAHP is the potential contribution of other voltage-gated calcium channels. While there has not been a systematic examination of which voltage-gated calcium channels mediate the sAHP in the amygdala, it is clear that voltage-gated calcium channels play a critical role in sAHP. The sAHP (or the underlying s
IAHP) is almost completely abolished by cadmium (
Faber et al., 2001;
Faber and Sah, 2002;
2003;
Washburn and Moises, 1992) and high concentrations of nickel (
Faber and Sah, 2002;
2003). In support of the suggestion that Ca
V1.3 operates in concert with other VGCCs is the observation that the N-type calcium channel blocker ω-conotoxin-GVIA significantly reduces s
IAHP in cultured rat hippocampal pyramidal neurons (
Shah and Haylett, 2000). Whatever the other source of calcium may be, the data presented here suggest that Ca
V1.3 plays a key role in the generation of the sAHP in amygdala principle neurons.
The fact that BLA-LTP and neuronal excitability, two hypothesized neurobiological substrates for learning and memory, are altered in Ca
v1.3 knockout mice makes it tempting to speculate that one or both of the abnormalities leads to the impaired ability of Ca
v1.3 knockout mice to consolidate contextual fear learning. Within the BLA, a strong case can be made that LTP is necessary for fear learning. Sensory information about many potential conditioned and unconditioned stimuli, including auditory, contextual, and somatosensory information, converge on the BLA (
Romanski, Clugnet, Bordi, and LeDoux, 1993;
von Bohlen und Halbach and Albrecht, 1998;
2002) and LTP has been demonstrated in each of these afferent pathways (
Bauer et al., 2002;
Chapman, Kairiss, Keenan, and Brown, 1990;
Drephal et al., 2006;
Huang, Martin, and Kandel, 2000;
Rogan, Staubli, and LeDoux, 1997;
Weisskopf et al., 1999). Additionally, fear learning has been shown to modify synaptic strength of afferents on to BLA neurons in a way similar to experimentally-induced LTP (
McKernan and Shinnick-Gallagher, 1997). Further, fear learning and BLA-LTP share similar stimulus contingencies (
Bauer, LeDoux, and Nader, 2001) and molecular mechanisms (
Rodrigues, Schafe, and LeDoux, 2004). Together, these observations suggest that an LTP-like mechanism underlies fear learning in the BLA. An example of the shared molecular mechanisms of fear learning and BLA-LTP which is consistent with our findings comes from a study in which
Bauer et al (2002) demonstrated that the L-VGCC antagonist blocks BLA-LTP as well as long-term fear memory when a L-VGCC antagonist was infused into the BLA. Based on these studies it would be logically consistent to hypothesize that the deficits in contextual fear conditioning consolidation observed in the Ca
v1.3 knockout mice is due to a reduction in BLA-LTP, however this hypothesis may be overly simplistic.
There is a significant disparity in time course between the BLA-LTP experiments and the deficits observed in the Ca
v1.3 knockout mice with regard to the consolidation of contextual fear conditioning (see
McKinney and Murphy 2006, ). This disparity has been reported frequently in the literature. Many manipulations (genetic and pharmacological) that impair long-term but not short-term memory block LTP within minutes after induction. The work of
Bauer et al. (2002) provides a relevant example. Application of the L-VGCC antagonist verapamil impaired BLA-LTP induced by paired stimulation of the EC immediately, whereas intra-amygdala infusion of the same L-VGCC antagonist before fear learning resulted in impairment performance 24 hours later, but not at earlier time points. Some have argued that this disparity in time course may reflect a difference in the way in which LTP is engaged naturally
in vivo and the way it is studied
in vitro. These differences include patterns of stimulation and modulation by other areas of the brain (
Schafe, Nader, Blair, and LeDoux, 2001). Alternatively, the LTP underlying fear memories may not be induced during training, but rather at a later time point, for example, during sleep. There is evidence that consolidation of memories may occur via the replaying of newly acquired patterns of activity during sleep (
Axmacher, Mormann, Fernández, Elger, and Fell, 2006) and thus replaying of specific patterns of neuronal activity during sleep may induce LTP.
Like LTP, changes in neuronal excitability have been proposed as a neurobiological substrate of learning. It has been suggested that enhanced excitability is not part of the encoding of learning per se, but rather serves a permissive function for synaptic modification (
Zhang and Linden, 2003). It is proposed that when a neuron is more excitable, the threshold for LTP is lower, thus information encoding is facilitated. Following this line of reasoning, one would expect animals with more excitable neurons to be better capable at encoding information and thus more efficient learners. Our results suggest this is not the case in Ca
v1.3 knockout mice. That is, though Ca
v1.3 knockout mice exhibit enhanced excitability in principal neurons of the BLA (the present study) and in CA1 neurons of the hippocampus (
Kuo et al., 2006), neither hippocampus-dependent learning (Morris water maze) nor BLA-dependent learning (contextual fear conditioning) is enhanced (
McKinney and Murphy, 2006). It could be that enhanced excitability does facilitate learning, but Ca
v1.3 knockout mice have other deficits that interfere with learning (e.g., impaired BLA-LTP). Further behavioral characterization of Ca
v1.3 knockout mice may reveal that there are some learning tasks on which they perform better than wild-type mice. Our data, however, are consistent with other data in which manipulations that enhance excitability rescue learning and memory deficits in aged animals (
Disterhoft, Thompson, Moyer, and Mogul, 1996;
Murphy, Fedorov, Giese, Ohno, Friedman, Chen, and Silva, 2004), but lead to impairments in young animals (
Giese, Storm, Reuter, Fedorov, Shao, Leicher, Pongs, and Silva, 1998).
Voltage-gated calcium channels have previously been implicated in amygdala neurophysiology, including LTP and neuronal excitability, but these data are the first to implicate the Cav1.3 subtype specifically. While it seems likely that the disruption of BLA- LTP or the aberrant increase in neuronal excitability could account for the impaired ability of Cav1.3 knockout mice to consolidate conditioned fear, a thorough understanding of the relative contributions of these two neurophysiological changes to the memory deficits observed in the Cav1.3 knockout mice awaits further study.