PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 July 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2746056
NIHMSID: NIHMS104925

Chronological comparison of root dentin moisture in extracted human teeth stored in formalin, sodium azide, and distilled water

Takashi Komabayashi, DDS, M.Dent.Sc., PhD,* Chul Ahn, PhD,** Song Zhang, PhD,** and Qiang Zhu, DDS, PhD***

Abstract

This study quantified in vitro the root dentin moisture when 10% formalin (Group A), 3% sodium azide (Group B), and distilled water (Group C) were used as teeth storage media. The root dentin moisture of 66 extracted human mandibular single-rooted teeth was measured at baseline (day 0) and at 1, 3, 7, and 14 days using a digital grain moisture meter. The baseline dentin moisture value was used as a covariate in the generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis. The mean dentin moisture values (%) ± standard deviation on days 0, 1, 3, 7, and 14 were 10.6±0.64, 14.3±0.71, 14.6±0.84, 14.4±0.64, and 14.7±0.75 (Group A); 11.4±0.94, 14.6±0.95, 14.6±0.76, 14.6±0.93, and 14.8±0.81 (Group B); and 10.2±0.95, 12.8±0.90, 13.3±0.95, 13.0±0.91, and 13.2±0.89 (Group C), respectively. The dentin moisture increased in all three groups; however, there was no overall significant difference in moisture between the formalin and sodium azide groups.

Keywords: Dentin moisture, Rapid non-destructive method, Impedance, Dentin-material interface, Structural strength of dentin, Formalin, Sodium azide, Bonding, Storage media

Introduction

Extracted human teeth are widely used for in vitro bond strength studies of adhesive restorative materials to dentin. A variety of media and methods have been used to store the teeth, keep them moist, and kill the bacteria in the teeth 1. The teeth are stored, for example, in neutral buffered formalin 1-3 or sodium azide 4, 5 until their use in a research laboratory.

An optimally moist dentin surface improves bond strengths when using adhesive systems and wet bonding techniques 6, 7. Ozok et al. reported that a significant source of dentin moisture during clinical use of adhesive techniques in vital teeth is dentinal fluid, which is modeled by intrapulpal pressure 8. However, dentin moisture in extracted human teeth lacks dentinal fluid. Thus, in vitro, dentin surface moisture can be influenced by dentin body moisture, which varies significantly in different tooth conditions. While the importance of dentin moisture in dentin bonding research is known, the effect of the storage media prior to their use with respect to dentin body moisture changes has not been characterized.

Recently, dentin bonding research has expanded to the field of endodontics because long-term endodontic treatment success is believed to depend on the prevention of apical and coronal leakage 9-12. To enhance the hydraulic seal, the resin-based adhesive bonding obturation system 13-16 and the post/core system 17-19 have been developed for use in clinical endodontics. However, reports on root dentin body moisture are scarce 20.

One reason for this shortage of reports may be that the traditional dentin moisture measurement technique involves the desiccation of samples to calculate weight change, a technique that is time-consuming and requires irreversible sample destruction. In contrast, a novel technique using a moisture content meter that accurately records the true dentin moisture content 20 was used in this study. Briefly, in 1990, a nondestructive method to estimate the humidity content of a single peanut kernel was accomplished by holding the kernel between two plates and measuring the moisture in it using a parallel plate capacitor 21. The digital grain moisture meter (TA-5, OGA Electric, Tochigi, Japan) is a commercial machine using the impedance methodology. This nondestructive grain moisture testing machine was calibrated using samples with known moisture content in order to measure the impedance of each sample 22. Although grains and teeth are structurally different, the previous study indicated that a moisture measuring mechanism using impedance can be successfully used in dentistry 20. The statistical analysis showed that the five grain modes of the digital grain moisture meter had high validity, which was a general indicator that they can be used for dentin moisture measurements.

The aim of this study was to chronologically compare the root dentin moisture of teeth stored in formalin, sodium azide, and distilled water.

Materials and Methods

The digital grain moisture meter (TA-5, OGA Electric, Tochigi, Japan) employed in this study was originally designed to measure the moisture in six different types of grain: unpolished rice, unhulled rice, polished rice, barley, wheat, and rye. The accuracy of the machine's readings for these grains is 0.1%. In a pilot study 20, the results indicated that the digital grain moisture meter accurately recorded the true dentin moisture content except for the polished rice mode. All other modes were accepted as recording the true dentin moisture content. Therefore, in the present study, the wheat mode was used for the measurements.

Sixty-six extracted human mandibular single-rooted teeth were placed in distilled water after extraction. The teeth were washed in running tap water overnight, sectioned perpendicular to the long axis at the CEJ with a diamond saw (Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL), and the coronal parts were discarded to access the root dentin. The root surface was cleaned, scaled, and planed for cementum removal. The pulp was mechanically removed by hand files without irrigants. All the samples were put into a laboratory dish and equilibrated in the tissue culture incubator (Nu Aire, Plymouth, MN) for 48 hours at 37°C and 100% humidity. The moisture of each dentin sample was measured five times using the grain meter at the wheat mode setting. The samples were kept in a sealed plastic bag to avoid moisture evaporation until measurements were taken. The completion of this procedure was defined as the baseline value for day 0. The step-by-step measurement method is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1
The step by step measurement method of the grain moisture testing machine

The 66 samples were randomly divided into three groups of 22 samples each. Those in Group A were immersed in 10 wt% neutral buffered formalin solution (Product Number HT50−1−128; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), while the samples in Group B were immersed in 0.3 wt% sodium azide solution (Product Number S2002; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Distilled water was used for the control samples in Group C. Each sample was placed in a polyethylene centrifuge tube (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA), and solution was added to fill the tube and completely submerge the sample. All the tubes were kept at 37°C and 100% humidity. The dentin moisture was measured after 1, 3, 7, and 14 days. At each measurement, the polyethylene centrifuge tube cap was opened, and the root dentin sample was removed with cotton pliers. The excess solution on the sample was gently wiped off using a Kimwipe before the sample was measured. The moisture in each dentin sample was immediately measured five times using the grain moisture meter at the wheat mode setting. Upon completion of the measurements, the sample was returned to the polyethylene centrifuge tube. The solution was not changed, and the sample was completely submerged prior to the time it was measured. The polyethylene centrifuge tube was capped, and the tubes were kept at 37°C and 100% humidity until the next scheduled measurement.

Statistical Methods

The moisture meter measurements taken on days 0, 1, 3, 7, and 14 from all 66 samples are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for each group (Group A: formalin; Group B: sodium azide) and compared with the control group (Group C; distilled water) A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to investigate if the dentin moisture at baseline (day 0) was significantly different among the three groups. If significance was found for the omnibus ANOVA test, a Newman-Keuls multiple comparisons test was used to perform pairwise comparisons. Statistical decisions were made at p=0.05, unless otherwise stated.

The generalized estimating equation (GEE) has been widely used in the analysis of repeated measurement data due to its robustness at identifying the misspecification of the true correlation structure 23. The GEE approach was used to investigate whether the dentin moisture was significantly different among the three groups over time. The baseline (day 0) dentin moisture value was used as a covariate in the GEE analysis to account for the difference in baseline dentin moisture among the three groups.

The minimal required period for soaking root dentin in different solutions to reach the highest dentin moisture was assessed by paired t-tests among different time points within each group. All analyses were performed using the SAS v.9.1.3. statistical package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

The mean dentin moisture (%) and standard deviation (SD) on days 0, 1, 3, 7, and 14 were 10.6±0.64, 14.3±0.71, 14.6±0.84, 14.4±0.64, and 14.7±0.75 in group A, 11.4±0.94, 14.6±0.95, 14.6±0.76, 14.6±0.93, and 14.8±0.81 in group B, 10.2±0.95, 12.8±0.90, 13.3±0.95, 13.0±0.91, and 13.2±0.89 in group C, respectively. (Figure 2) The ANOVA analysis showed that dentin moisture at day 0 was significantly different among the three groups (p<0.001). The Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test indicated that the group A and C were not significantly different in terms of baseline (day 0) dentin moisture, but both groups were significantly different from the group B.

Figure 2
Average dentin moisture over time

After adjusting for the differences in baseline (day 0) dentin moisture, GEE analysis indicated that, on average, the group A and B, with means (SD) 1.32 (0.19) and 1.22 (0.25), respectively, had significantly higher dentin moisture than the group C. There was no overall significant difference in dentin moisture between groups A and B. Furthermore, there was a significant time (days) effect with day 1 significantly lower than the other days.

The pair-wise comparisons among different time points within each group indicate that soaking root dentin in group A solution for 1 day significantly increases dentin moisture (p-value<0.001). However, soaking the root dentin in group A for 3 days or more does not further increase the moisture. The same conclusion applies to the group B. For the control group C, it suggests that soaking the dentin root in water for up to 3 days significantly increases moisture, but no significant increase afterward.

Discussion

Formalin is composed of formaldehyde, methyl alcohol, and sodium acetate in water 24. Formaldehyde acts to preserve tissues by causing the cross-linking of proteins, glycoproteins, nucleic acids, and polysaccharides, which form insoluble methylene bridge products. The cross-linking of these macromolecules fixes the specimen and prevents the degradation of tissues after cell death occurs 25. Thus, neutral-buffered formalin has been used routinely for the preservation of pathological specimens, which allows long-term storage 2. The infection control guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that extracted teeth used for educational or research purposes be stored in 10% formalin for two weeks 26-28. Other techniques, for example, gamma-ray sterilization of extracted teeth and storage in distilled water are also used 29.

It is known that a range of biomechanical features such as the collagen cross-link content of dentin is affected by moisture 30; however, the precise distribution and arrangement of water molecules within the collagen-hydroxyapatite of human dentin are not known. It has been calculated that 75.2% of the water is in the tubules and 24.8% of the water is in the mineralized matrix 31. In the results of the present study, after adjusting for the differences in baseline dentin moisture, the generalized linear model indicated that, on average, the formalin group had significantly higher dentin moisture compared to the water group with means (SD) of 1.32 (0.19). Soaking root dentin in formalin beyond 3 days does not further increase the dentin moisture.

Retief et al. stored teeth for 2 days or for 6 months in buffered formalin before testing the shear bond strengths of resin to dentin 32. Their results showed that the differences between 2 days and 6 months were not statistically significant. If the shear bond strength correlates with dentin moisture, the fact that soaking root dentin in formalin beyond 3 days does not further increase dentin moisture may be partially explained. Further, Titley et al. found little effect of formalin on the bond strength to bovine dentin 1. The current study indicated that dentin moisture increased in the first few days. It is speculated that the cross-linkage of collagen may occur in the first few days.

Sodium azide is a commonly used preservative for laboratory reagents. As a storage medium, sodium azide has been used to inhibit microbial growth in teeth due to a mechanism involving metal ion complexation and displacement from enzymes. Sodium azide is not a fixative; thus, the cross-linking of collagen is less expected. However, with respect to dentin moisture, there is no overall significant difference in dentin moisture between the formalin and sodium azide groups. As with formalin, dentin moisture in sodium azide increased in the first few days and then stabilized.

Distilled water was used as a control in the present study. Addy and Mostafa used distilled water as a tooth storage medium 33. Although distilled water will not change the dentin properties such as the cross-linkage of collagen, special attention should be paid to infection control. In future research, if the issue of infection control has been addressed, formalin and sodium azide could be used immediately after the tooth extraction as a storage medium.

Jameson et al. reported on whether storage media and time cause any changes in water loss through the dehydration of the dentin 2. While they used the traditional method of determining weight change and tracing water loss to measure moisture, the current study used a novel, rapid, non-destructive method 20. This new method is suitable for studying the impact of dentin moisture content on teeth during in vitro bonding experimentation. It is possible in future research to combine this technique with the in vitro dentin bonding experimentation. To quantitatively determine the optimal level of dentin moisture with the highest dentin bonding strength may provide us with useful information that will lead to the next phase of research with the goal of using impedance for rapid and non-destructive dentin moisture measurement in the clinical setting.

Conclusions

Soaking root dentin in formalin or sodium azide solution beyond 1 day, or soaking root dentin in water beyond 3 days, does not further increase dentin moisture.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ms. Jeanne Santa Cruz (Texas A&M Health Science Center Baylor College of Dentistry) for the critical editing.

This publication was supported by Grant Number NIH KL2RR024983 (TK) and UL1 RR024982, entitled, “North and Central Texas Clinical and Translational Science Initiative” (Milton Packer, M.D., PI) from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, and its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NCRR or NIH. Information on NCRR is available at http://www.ncrr.nih.gov/. Information on Re-engineering the Clinical Research Enterprise can be obtained from http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/clinicalresearch/overview-translational.asp.”

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Titley KC, Chernecky R, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV. The effect of various storage methods and media on shear-bond strengths of dental composite resin to bovine dentine. Arch Oral Biol. 1998;43:305–11. [PubMed]
2. Jameson MW, Tidmarsh BG, Hood JA. Effect of storage media on subsequent water loss and regain by human and bovine dentine and on mechanical properties of human dentine in vitro. Arch Oral Biol. 1994;39:759–67. [PubMed]
3. Wenner KK, Fairhurst CW, Morris CF, Hawkins IK, Ringle RD. Microleakage of root restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1988;117:825–8. [PubMed]
4. Tao L, Reynolds JM, Pashley DH. Effect of Dycal on dentin permeability. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1988;4:16–8. [PubMed]
5. Huang TJ, Schilder H, Nathanson D. Effects of moisture content and endodontic treatment on some mechanical properties of human dentin. J Endod. 1992;18:209–15. [PubMed]
6. Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SH. Relation between water content in acetone/alcohol-based primer and interfacial ultrastructure. J Dent. 1998;26:147–56. [PubMed]
7. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Duke ES, Eick JD, et al. A TEM study of two water-based adhesive systems bonded to dry and wet dentin. J Dent Res. 1998;77:50–9. [PubMed]
8. Ozok AR, Wu MK, De Gee AJ, Wesselink PR. Effect of dentin perfusion on the sealing ability and microtensile bond strengths of a total-etch versus an all-in-one adhesive. Dent Mater. 2004;20:479–86. [PubMed]
9. Begotka BA, Hartwell GR. The importance of the coronal seal following root canal treatment. Va Dent J. 1996;73:8–10. [PubMed]
10. Madison S, Swanson K, Chiles SA. An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth. Part II. Sealer types. J Endod. 1987;13:109–12. [PubMed]
11. Madison S, Wilcox LR. An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth. Part III. In vivo study. J Endod. 1988;14:455–8. [PubMed]
12. Swanson K, Madison S. An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth. Part I. Time periods. J Endod. 1987;13:56–9. [PubMed]
13. Imai Y, Komabayashi T. Properties of a new injectable type of root canal filling resin with adhesiveness to dentin. J Endod. 2003;29:20–3. [PubMed]
14. Leonard JE, Gutmann JL, Guo IY. Apical and coronal seal of roots obturated with a dentine bonding agent and resin. Int Endod J. 1996;29:76–83. [PubMed]
15. Shipper G, Ørstavik D, Teixeira FB, Trope M. An evaluation of microbial leakage in roots filled with a thermoplastic synthetic polymer-based root canal filling material (Resilon). J Endod. 2004;30:342–7. [PubMed]
16. Kataoka H, Yoshioka T, Suda H, Imai Y. Dentin bonding and sealing ability of a new root canal resin sealer. J Endod. 2000;26:230–5. [PubMed]
17. Bachicha WS, DiFiore PM, Miller DA, Lautenschlager EP, Pashley DH. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with posts. J Endod. 1998;24:703–8. [PubMed]
18. Duret B, Duret F, Reynaud M. Long-life physical property preservation and postendodontic rehabilitation with the Composipost. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl. 1996;20:S50–6. [PubMed]
19. Nakabayashi N, Watanabe A, Gendusa NJ. Dentin adhesion of “modified” 4-META/MMA-TBB resin: function of HEMA. Dent Mater. 1992;8:259–64. [PubMed]
20. Komabayashi T, Zhu Q, Jiang J, Safavi KE, Spångberg LS. A rapid nondestructive method for root dentin moisture measurements: in vitro pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:e107–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Kandala CVK, Nelson SO. Measurement of moisture content in single kernels of peanuts: a nondestructive electrical method. Transactions of the ASAE. 1990;33:567–71.
22. Kandala CVK. Moisture determination in single peanut pods by complex RF inpedance measurement. IEEE Transactions on instrumentation and measurement. 2004;53:1493–6.
23. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal Data-Analysis Using Generalized Linear-Models. Biometrika. 1986;73:13–22.
24. DeWald JP. The use of extracted teeth for in vitro bonding studies: a review of infection control considerations. Dent Mater. 1997;13:74–81. [PubMed]
25. Hopwood D. Fixatives and fixation: a review. Histochem J. 1969;1:323–60. [PubMed]
26. Tate WH, White RR. Disinfection of human teeth for educational purposes. J Dent Educ. 1991;55:583–5. [PubMed]
27. George SW, Pichardo MR, Bergeron BE, Jeansonne BG. The effect of formalin storage on the apical microleakage of obturated canals. J Endod. 2006;32:869–71. [PubMed]
28. CDC Guidelines for Infection Control in Dental Health-Care Settings. MMWR. 2003;52:33. [PubMed]
29. White JM, Goodis HE, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. Sterilization of teeth by gamma radiation. J Dent Res. 1994;73:1560–7. [PubMed]
30. Sedgley CM, Messer HH. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? J Endod. 1992;18:332–5. [PubMed]
31. van der Graaf ER, ten Bosch JJ. The uptake of water by freeze-dried human dentine sections. Arch Oral Biol. 1990;35:731–9. [PubMed]
32. Retief DH, Wendt SL, Bradley EL, Denys FR. The effect of storage media and duration of storage of extracted teeth on the shear bond strength of Scotchbond 2/Silux to dentin. Am J Dent. 1989;2:269–73. [PubMed]
33. Addy M, Mostafa P. Dentine hypersensitivity. I. Effects produced by the uptake in vitro of metal ions, fluoride and formaldehyde onto dentine. J Oral Rehabil. 1988;15:575–85. [PubMed]