PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of corrspringer.comThis journalToc AlertsSubmit OnlineOpen Choice
 
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 October; 467(10): 2691–2694.
Published online 2009 April 4. doi:  10.1007/s11999-009-0805-y
PMCID: PMC2745451

Incidence of the Remnant Femoral Attachment of the Ruptured ACL

Abstract

The presence of remnant tibial and femoral attachments of the ruptured ACL has been described in the literature but the femoral remnant has not been well described as a landmark for tunnel placement during reconstruction. We reviewed operative reports, pictures, and videotapes from 111 ACL reconstructions to determine the incidence of a remnant femoral stump. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A included patients treated from January 2006 through September 2006 (n = 63) when the presence of the femoral footprint was documented retrospectively and Group B included patients treated from September 2006 through June 2007 (n = 48) when the presence or absence of the femoral footprint was documented prospectively. In Group A, there were 48 of 58 (83%) patients with a visible stump and 10 (17%) patients in whom we could not verify the existence of the stump. In Group B, 43 of 44 (98%) patients had a visible stump on the lateral femoral wall that was adequate as a guide for femoral tunnel placement. The native femoral footprint is seen in most cases of ACL reconstruction and can be used for guidance during femoral tunnel preparation.

Introduction

An estimated 75,000 to 100,000 ACL reconstructions are performed annually in the United States [22]. The goal of these procedures is to restore the anatomy and function of the native ACL. Improper graft placement is believed to be a major cause of failure in current ACL reconstruction techniques, with femoral tunnel malposition cited as a common error [2, 5, 6, 9, 14, 1921]. The most common technical error is anterior placement of the femoral tunnel, resulting in increased graft tightness in flexion and excessive strain on the graft [5]. Placing the femoral tunnel too vertical (at 11 o’clock rather than 10 o’clock) in the coronal plane in the notch is another common mistake, which results in decreased resistance to rotatory loads [13, 17].

Remnants of the tibial insertion of the ACL have been used as guides for tibial tunnel placement to restore the native anatomy [10]. Using the native attachment may limit such problems as graft impingement resulting from anterior placement of the tibial tunnel [1]. Additionally, placing the tibial tunnel too lateral or medial can result in impingement on the lateral femoral condyle or PCL, respectively [15].

To determine the likelihood of being able to use the femoral remnant footprint as a guide to tunnel placement, we determined the incidence of the remnant femoral attachment on the lateral wall of the notch after ACL rupture as seen during arthroscopic reconstruction.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively studied 111 patients undergoing ACL reconstructions from January 3, 2006, through May 31, 2007. The patients were divided in two groups. Group A (n = 63) included patients operated on from January 3, 2006, through September 19, 2006, when the existence of the femoral footprint in the notch was retrospectively documented from a review of operative reports, pictures, and videotapes. Group B (n = 48) included patients operated on from September 28, 2006, through May 31, 2007, when the presence of the ACL femoral footprint was prospectively documented intraoperatively. There were no differences between Groups A and B in terms of gender, age, and time to surgery from injury. There were 71 male and 40 female patients with an average age of 27.8 years (range, 13–56 years). The right knee was affected in 60 patients and the left in 51. We excluded five patients in Group A and four in Group B with previous ACL reconstructions. After excluding patients with revisions, 58 patients remained in Group A and 44 in Group B. Surgery was performed an average of 6.4 months after injury (range, 0.5–96 months). There were two chronic injuries (treated greater than 1 year after injury) in Group A and one in Group B. One patient in Group A could not specify the time of injury. Approval for this study was obtained from our institutional review board before proceeding with this research.

In Group A, we performed arthroscopic reconstruction of the ACL after diagnostic arthroscopy and notchplasty. We retrospectively reviewed operative reports, pictures, videotapes, and patient charts. Operative reports were reviewed specifically for a statement by the surgeon that the native ACL stump was visible. In cases where the surgeon did not state whether the femoral stump was identifiable, intraoperative arthroscopy photographs and videotapes were reviewed to further elucidate whether the stump was present. In Group B, a thorough arthroscopic evaluation was performed, before notchplasty and ACL reconstruction, in which the intercondylar notch was inspected to carefully identify any remaining ACL fibers at the femoral attachment site. As in Group A, all knees in Group B were positioned in 90° flexion with the leg hanging over the edge of the operating table with a lateral post. All arthroscopies were performed with a 30° arthroscope. In addition to a standard diagnostic arthroscopy, the posterior aspect of the joint was observed routinely by placing the arthroscope through the notch such that the posterior aspect of the lateral femoral condyle was seen. In all cases, inferomedial, inferolateral, and superomedial portals were used.

We performed a limited notchplasty to better observe the stump and took intraoperative pictures of nearly all the cases in Group B (Fig. 1). The notchplasty consisted of removing just enough bone (2–5 mm) at the anterior aspect of the lateral wall of the notch to provide adequate observation of the femoral origin of the ACL during femoral tunnel placement. The femoral stump was identified based on feel during probing and appearance, which typically differed from the surrounding soft tissues. The residual stump tended to have a more bulbous appearance and to be firmly adherent. When the femoral stump was identified, its central portion was used as a guide for femoral tunnel placement. We were not able to identify anteromedial and posterolateral femoral insertions, rather a single stump in all cases. We used an Arthrex RetroDrill (Arthrex, Inc, Naples, FL) to create the femoral tunnel, using a single-bundle technique. The retrodrill was centered on the residual femoral stump, engaged on the antegrade-placed guidewire, and then used to drill the femoral tunnel in a retrograde manner.

Fig. 1A B
Observation of the residual femoral attachment of the ACL was improved after a limited notchplasty, as shown in a (A) lateral wall right knee, and a (B) lateral wall left knee.

Results

In Group A, 48 of the 58 patients (83%) had visible stumps. In 10 cases (17%), the existence of the femoral stump could not be verified from the operative pictures or reports. In the two cases treated greater than 1 year after injury, only one had an identifiable femoral stump. In Group B, 43 of the 44 patients (98%) had a visible ACL stump left at the native femoral footprint, which was used as a guide for femoral tunnel placement. Only one (2%) had a residual stump that was not substantial enough to be used as a guide for tunnel placement. This patient was treated 96 months after the initial injury and previously underwent arthroscopy with partial meniscectomy during which a torn ACL was identified but not reconstructed. It is possible the surgeon resected the ACL remnant to prevent impingement or to facilitate future ACL reconstruction [3].

Discussion

Improper graft placement, especially on the femur, is believed to be a major cause of failure in current ACL reconstruction techniques [2, 5, 6, 9, 14, 1921]. Several anatomic studies showed high variability in location and dimensions of the ACL femoral attachment [4, 7, 8]. The o’clock femoral tunnel positioning technique fails to incorporate the three-dimensional characteristics of the ACL on the medial surface of the lateral femoral condyle. Considering the variability of the femoral footprint, generic o’clock femoral tunnel positions should not be used with every patient to achieve more anatomic reconstruction and restore the native function of the ACL. Some of the more common errors in tunnel placement, including anterior and vertical femoral tunnel positioning, may be avoided by using the native femoral attachment as a guide for tunnel placement. The goal of this study was to investigate the incidence of a remnant femoral attachment of the ACL and to describe its use as a landmark for femoral tunnel placement.

There are some limitations to this study. In Group A, data were collected retrospectively. The presence of a femoral stump may be underestimated owing to failure of the surgeon to report or photograph this finding. There is also potential for bias on the part of the authors who may anticipate presence of a residual femoral attachment. It is possible scar tissue or hypertrophic synovial lining could be mistaken for remnant ACL, particularly in cases where the presence of this remnant was not prospectively documented. In Group B, where data were collected prospectively, we believe it is less likely to have mistakenly identified a remnant attachment.

Several studies report different percentages of femoral ACL remnants remaining in the notch. Our results are consistent with those of Lo et al. [12], who reported only 2% of previously ruptured ACLs were absent during arthroscopic reconstruction. Zantop et al. [22] presented pictures in which the femoral stump was visible in the notch of intraarticular rupture patterns of the ACL. In their study, two bundles were identified. In a study by Twaddle et al. [18] on knee dislocations, none of the knees had proximal avulsions whereas 19 of 53 knees had distal avulsions of the ACL. In contrast, Crain et al. [3] reported the ACL remnant in 58% of patients was healed to the lateral wall in a different site from its anatomic origin and in 42% the lateral wall was completely empty. Ochi et al. [16] noted similar findings. We suspect, based on our observations, a short stump would have been revealed at the anatomic origin of the ACL in most cases after a careful notchplasty. Failure to perform a careful notchplasty also may contribute to the difference between Groups A and B in our study.

The remnant of the femoral footprint of the ACL may be a useful landmark to aid in accurate placement of the femoral tunnel during ACL reconstruction. In a recent study by Kaseta et al. [11], more anatomic placement of the femoral tunnel was achieved using the femoral footprint as a landmark than with the over-the-top positioning guide, which resulted in femoral tunnel placement that was typically too anterior.

The ACL femoral footprint is seen in most cases of ACL reconstruction and can be used for guidance in the femoral tunnel placement. As this series included only three cases of chronic instability, it is unclear whether the femoral stump would serve as a reliable landmark in less acute settings. Additional studies are necessary to determine if use of the femoral footprint as a guide for tunnel placement results in function more closely approximating that of the native ACL.

Footnotes

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

References

1. Amis AA, Jakob RP. Principles for placing the tibial tunnel and avoiding roof impingement during reconstruction of a torn anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1994;2:138–146. [PubMed]
2. Asano H, Muneta T, Shinomiya K. Evaluation of clinical factors affecting knee pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2002;15:23–28. [PubMed]
3. Crain EH, Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Luetzow WF. Variation in anterior cruciate ligament scar pattern: does the scar pattern affect anterior laxity in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees? Arthroscopy. 2005;21:19–24. [PubMed]
4. Dodds JA, Arnoczky SP. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament: a blueprint for repair and reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1994;10:132–139. [PubMed]
5. Fithian DC, Paxton LW, Goltz DH. Fate of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 2002;33:621–636. [PubMed]
6. Getelman MH, Friedman MJ. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1999;7:189–198. [PubMed]
7. Girgis FG, Marshall JL, Monajem A. The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint: anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;106:216–231. [PubMed]
8. Giron F, Cuomo P, Aglietti P, Bull AM, Amis AA. Femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:250–256. [PubMed]
9. Grossman MG, ElAttrache NS, Shields CL, Glousman RE. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: three- to nine-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:418–423. [PubMed]
10. Hantes ME, Dailiana Z, Zachos VC, Varitimidis SE. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the Bio-TransFix femoral fixation device and anteromedial portal technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:497–501. [PubMed]
11. Kaseta MK, DeFrate LE, Charnock BL, Sullivan RT, Garrett WE. Reconstruction technique affects femoral tunnel placement during ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1467–1474. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Lo IK, de Maat GH, Valk JW, Frank CB. The gross morphology of torn human anterior cruciate ligaments in unstable knees. Arthroscopy. 1999;15:301–316. [PubMed]
13. Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SL. Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between 11 o’clock and 10 o’clock femoral tunnel placement. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:297–304. [PubMed]
14. Lohmander LS, Ostenberg A, Englund M, Roos H. High prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, pain, and functional limitations in female soccer players twelve years after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:3145–3152. [PubMed]
15. Muneta T, Yamamoto H, Ishibashi T, Murakami S, Furuya K. The effects of tibial tunnel placement and roofplasty on reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament knees. Arthroscopy. 1995;11:57–62. [PubMed]
16. Ochi M, Adachi N, Deie M, Kanaya A. Anterior cruciate ligament augmentation procedure with a 1-incision technique: anteromedial bundle or posterolateral bundle reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:463.e1–463.e5. [PubMed]
17. Scopp JM, Jasper LE, Belkoff SM, Moorman CT 3rd. The effect of oblique femoral tunnel placement on rotational constraint of the knee reconstructed using patellar tendon autografts. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:294–299. [PubMed]
18. Twaddle BC, Bidwell TA, Chapman JR. Knee dislocations: where are the lesions? A prospective evaluation of surgical findings in 63 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17:198–202. [PubMed]
19. Von Porat A, Roos EM, Roos H. High prevalence of osteoarthritis 14 years after an anterior cruciate ligament tear in male soccer players: a study of radiographic and patient relevant outcomes. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:269–273. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Wetzler MJ, Bartolozzi AR, Gillespie MJ, Rubenstein DL, Ciccotti MG, Miller LS. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Oper Tech Orthop. 1996;6:181–189.
21. Wolf RS, Lemak LJ. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. J South Orthop Assoc. 2002;11:25–32. [PubMed]
22. Zantop T, Brucker PU, Vidal A, Zelle BA, Fu FH. Intraarticular rupture pattern of the ACL. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:48–53. [PubMed]

Articles from Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research are provided here courtesy of The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons