PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Nature. Author manuscript; available in PMC Nov 21, 2009.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2743854
NIHMSID: NIHMS102624
High frequency modification of plant genes using engineered zinc finger nucleases
Jeffrey A. Townsend,* David A. Wright,* Ronnie J. Winfrey, Fengli Fu, Morgan L. Maeder,1,2 J. Keith Joung,1,2,3 and Daniel F. Voytas4,5
1Molecular Pathology Unit and Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129 USA
2Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114 USA
3Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA
4Department of Genetics, Cell Biology & Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
5Center for Genome Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
Department of Genetics, Development & Cell Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011 USA
*These authors contributed equally to this work.
Author information DNA sequence of the SuRB locus has been deposited with GenBank under accession number FJ649655. Reprints and permissions are available at www.nature.com/reprints. Requests for OPEN reagents should be addressed to J.K.J (jjoung/at/partnersorg).
Correspondence: Daniel F. Voytas Department of Genetics, Cell Biology & Development 6-160 Jackson Hall, 325 Church Street SE Minneapolis, MN 55455 Phone: 612-626-4509; Fax: 612-626-2600 Email: voytas/at/umn.edu
Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to D.F.V. (voytas/at/umn.edu).
An efficient method for making directed DNA sequence modifications to plant genes (gene targeting) is presently lacking, thereby frustrating efforts to dissect plant gene function and engineer crop plants that better produce the world's burgeoning need for food, fiber and fuel. Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) - enzymes engineered to create DNA double strand breaks at specific loci - are potent stimulators of gene targeting,1,2 including at engineered reporter genes in plants.3,4 Here we demonstrate high frequency ZFN-stimulated gene targeting at endogenous plant genes, namely the tobacco acetohydroxyacid synthase (SuRA and SuRB) genes, for which specific mutations are known to confer resistance to imidazolinone and sulfonylurea herbicides.5 Herbicide-resistance mutations were introduced into SuR loci by ZFN-mediated gene targeting at frequencies exceeding 2% of transformed cells for mutations as far as 1.3 kb from the ZFN cleavage site. More than 40% of recombinant plants had modifications in multiple SuR alleles. The observed high frequency of gene targeting indicates that it is now possible to efficiently make targeted sequence changes in endogenous plant genes.
ZFNs were engineered that recognize SuR loci using publicly available resources provided by the Zinc Finger Consortium.6,7 The Consortium-sponsored ZFN architecture uses two zinc finger arrays (ZFAs), each with three zinc fingers that collectively recognize a nine bp target site (Supplementary Fig. 1A). The ZFAs are fused to a FokI nuclease domain, and a 5-7 bp spacer separates the target sites for the two arrays, allowing the nuclease to dimerize and cleave within the spacer. ZFA engineering is most robust for G-rich sequences,8 and four such target sites were selected in SuRB for constructing ZFAs by modular assembly, namely the joining together of individual zinc fingers with predetermined specificities (sites 815, 1071, 1853 and 1947) (Fig. 1A, Supplementary Table 1)9. Thirty-two ZFAs were constructed, and electrophoretic mobility shift assays identified three arrays with DNA binding activity, two of which bind half sites for the 815 target. This low success rate is consistent with previous findings that ZFAs constructed by modular assembly are often non-functional.8
Figure 1
Figure 1
The tobacco SuRB locus. a) The diagram is drawn to scale and annotated with ZFN sites, amino substitutions that confer herbicide resistance, PCR primers used to characterize recombinants, and the region used as a donor template. b) ZFN target sites. Left (more ...)
Oligomerized Pool Engineering (OPEN) - a method developed by the Consortium - employs genetic selections in bacteria to identify ZFA variants that recognize specific target sequences6 (Supplementary Fig. 1B). ZFAs made by OPEN typically show higher activity than those made by modular assembly, likely because the process of selection accommodates context-dependent interactions among neighboring zinc fingers in the array.6,10,11 OPEN was used to generate ZFNs for four sites (sites 865, 1853, 1947, 2163), including two that had been targeted by modular assembly (Supplementary Table 2). Functional left and right ZFAs were obtained for the 1853 target, for which modular assembly had failed, as well as for target 2163. The OPEN-derived ZFAs showed activity in bacterial two-hybrid (B2H) assays,7 in which binding of ZFAs upstream of a lacZ reporter gene activates expression (Supplementary Table 2).
To test whether the ZFAs function as ZFNs, an assay was developed that measures ZFN activity in yeast (Supplementary Fig. 2A). This assay uses a lacZ reporter gene with a 125 bp internal DNA sequence duplication. The ZFN target site is cloned between the duplicated sequences, and cleavage of the target site creates a functional lacZ gene through repair of the break by single strand annealing. ZFN activity is assessed by quantitative measurements of β-galactosidase activity. The six ZFAs for the 815, 1853 and 2163 target sites functioned effectively as ZFNs (Fig. 2A). The 815 left and 1853 right arrays showed the most activity, comparable to activity observed with a ZFN designed from the well-characterized Zif268 ZFA.2
Figure 2
Figure 2
Activity of engineered ZFAs and ZFNs. a) ZFAs as stimulators of recombination in yeast. Target sites for each ZFA are listed in vertical text below the chart; H, high-copy plasmid; L, low-copy plasmid. Error bars denote s.d.; n = 3. b) Engineered ZFNs (more ...)
ZFNs were tested against their endogenous targets in tobacco by measuring whether they create mutations by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) (Supplementary Fig. 2B). ZFN-encoding constructs were electroporated into tobacco protoplasts, and the relevant target sites in SuRA and SuRB were amplified by PCR and subjected to high-throughput pyrosequencing.12 The fraction of unique sequence reads showing size-polymorphisms (consistent with imprecise repair by NHEJ) was normalized to controls (Fig. 2B, Supplementary Table 3). Mutation frequencies were significantly higher for ZFN 815 at both SuR loci. Interestingly, the highest mutation frequencies were not at the intended target in SuRB, but rather at the corresponding sequence in SuRA, which differs by two nucleotides. Not only does the ZFN 815 (which was created by modular assembly) lack specificity, but the higher level of mutagenesis at SuRA relative to SurB suggests other factors such as chromatin or DNA methylation influence access of this enzyme to target sites. In contrast to ZFN 815, the OPEN-designed ZFN 1853 only showed enhanced mutagenesis at its intended SuRB target, which differs in sequence from the SuRA site by a single nucleotide. This suggests that the genetic selections used in OPEN yield ZFNs with high specificity. No enhancement of mutagenesis was observed with ZFN 2163.
To measure whether the engineered ZFNs could stimulate incorporation of specific DNA sequence changes at SuR loci by homologous recombination (HR) (Supplementary Fig. 2B), three donor templates were constructed, each with a missense mutation that confers resistance to one or more herbicides (P191A, chlorsulfuron; S647T, imazaquin; W568L, chlorsulfuron and imazaquin)5,13 (Fig. 1A). Silent nucleotide changes were introduced into codons adjacent to each mutation to distinguish the donor template from the native locus and spontaneous mutants from those generated by recombination (Fig. 1B). An additional set of donor templates was made in which the ZFN recognition sites were altered to prevent cleavage (Fig. 1C).
To test for gene targeting by HR, plasmids encoding the 815 ZFNs were electroporated into tobacco protoplasts with donor templates bearing the P191A, W568L or S647T mutations (Table 1, rows 1-3). The mean ZFN-induced herbicide resistance ranged from 5.3% for the P191A donor to 2.4% for the S647T donor. Both SuRA and SuRB were PCR-amplified from 12 randomly selected resistant calli derived from each treatment, using primers specific for the target locus (Fig. 1A). DNA sequence analysis revealed that in 9 of 12 lines generated with both the P191A and W568L donor template, resistance was due to HR (P191A: 5 in SuRA and 4 in SuRB; W568L: 4 at SuRA, 5 at SuRB) (Table 2, rows 1-3, Supplementary Table 4). With the S647T donor template, only 1 of the 12 herbicide resistant lines had evidence of HR (at SuRA) and nine were spontaneous SuRB mutants. For 8 of the 36 resistant lines in the gene targeting experiments, no mutations were observed in SuRA or SuRB, and so the molecular basis for the resistance is unknown. This resistance could be due to genotypic and phenotypic variation (somoclonal variation) typically observed when plant cells are grown in culture.14 Based on the number of recombinants recovered, the estimated gene targeting frequencies range from 4.0% for P191 to 0.2% for S647 (Table 1).
Table 1
Table 1
Gene targeting frequencies at SuRA and SuRB.
Table 2
Table 2
Molecular basis for herbicide resistance in gene targeting experiments.
One surprising outcome of the above experiment was that gene targeting frequencies exceeding 2% were obtained at a distance more than 1.3 kb from the cleavage site. This suggests that plant genes can be modified even when DNA sequence composition precludes engineering ZFNs near the desired site of modification. The high frequencies of recombination observed at both SuRA and SuRB with ZFN 815 are consistent with the pyrosequencing data indicating that this enzyme cuts promiscuously at both targets (Fig. 2B). SuRA and SuRB differ at the nucleotide sequence level by 4%,5 and it is notable that high efficiency gene targeting could be achieved at SuRA using the SuRB-derived donor template.
We next tested the ability of the 1853 and 2163 ZFNs to stimulate HR and incorporate amino acid sequence changes near their respective target sites. Donor templates were used with mutations in the ZFN target site that prevent cleavage. ZFN 815 was used as a control, and the mutated donor did not substantially alter the overall frequency of herbicide resistance or gene targeting (Table 1, compare rows 1 & 4). The mutated P191A donor template did, however, cause an increase in the proportion of gene targeting events at SuRB relative to SuRA (Table 2, compare rows 1 & 4). Why inability to cleave the donor template influences the outcome of recombination is unclear. For the 1853 ZFN, the mean number of herbicide resistant events at W568L (281 bp from the cut site) was 0.6% (Table 1, row 5), more than 5-fold lower than gene targeting observed with ZFN 815 at much greater distances from the cut site. The 2163 ZFN yielded only three, non-targeted herbicide resistant calli in twelve separate experiments, two of which had mutations at sites in SuRB previously known to confer herbicide resistance13 (Supplementary Table 5 and data not shown). The activity of all three ZFNs in HR parallels activities of these enzymes in the yeast and NHEJ assays (Fig. 2). Among the 47 herbicide resistant calli analyzed in the various gene targeting experiments, 19 (40.4%) showed modifications at multiple SuR loci, including mutations introduced by NHEJ at the ZFN cleavage site (Supplementary Tables 4 & 5). This indicates that transformed cells that sustain a ZFN-induced modification often incur changes at multiple alleles. Ten plants were regenerated from herbicide resistant calli and shown to carry the SuRA and SuRB mutations (Supplementary Tables 4 & 5), indicating that ZFN-assisted gene targeting can be used to engineer genetically modified whole plants.
Based on the high frequency of gene targeting observed at SuRA and SuRB, we reasoned that populations of cells transformed with ZFNs might be screened directly for gene targeting events. To test this, protoplasts were transformed with plasmids encoding the 815 ZFN, the P191A donor template, as well as a neomycin phosphotransferase II (NPTII) gene that confers resistance to kanamycin. In this experiment, NPTII was used merely to identify cells that had been transformed. Approximately 1000 transformed cells were transferred to media with herbicide, and two calli displayed herbicide resistance, both of which carried mutations introduced by the donor template (Supplementary Table 4). Although this experiment identified HR events at the SuR loci by examining herbicide resistance, its success suggests that screens, perhaps using high throughput DNA sequencing, could be used to identify recombinants among populations of transformants for any genetic modification introduced by recombination, regardless of whether a selection exists for its associated phenotype.
Current methods for modifying plant genomes are limited to decades-old methods of DNA transformation that lack precision and control over the outcome of the modified chromosome. Plant biologists have long sought a method to make directed mutations in plant genes with high efficiency, as evidenced here with the use of ZFNs. Gene targeting offers numerous opportunities for studying plant gene function, and it also enables biosynthetic pathways to be harnessed to better produce much-needed plant-derived products. The ability to engineer highly functional ZFNs using publicly available reagents and to recover HR-induced mutations even at considerable distances from the ZFN cleavage site demonstrate that targeted mutagenesis in plants is now practical.
ZFA engineering and testing
Engineering of ZFAs by modular assembly or OPEN followed protocols established by the Zinc Finger Consortium.6,7 Assessments of ZFA function are described in greater detail in the supplementary material online and are summarized in Supplementary Table 6.
Plant cell transformation and culture
Tobacco protoplasts were prepared from aseptically grown plants and transformed by electroporation as previously described4. Prior to transformation, donor, ZFN-, and NPTII-encoding DNAs were linearized by digestion with BglI, AlwNI, or FspI, respectively. Electroporation experiments used 20 μg each of donor template and ZFN-encoding DNA. Chlorsulfuron (5 ppb) and imazaquin (0.5 ppm) were used for selection, the former for the P191A and W568L donor templates and the latter for the S647T donor. Transformation frequencies were assessed using SuRB genes with herbicide resistance mutations. Numbers of resistant calli were scored 30 days post treatment. All of the gene targeting experiments used obligate heterodimeric FokI domains fused to the left and right ZFAs.15,16 Experiments with homodimeric (wildtype) FokI domains reduced plating efficiency relative to experiments with the heterodimeric domains, and no gene targeting events were recovered, consistent with high levels of ZFN-induced toxicity (Supplementary Table 7).
Characterization of recombinant plant material
DNA was isolated from calli with the PowerPlant DNA isolation kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, Inc, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The entire coding regions of both SuRA and SuRB were PCR-amplified using primers specific to the 5' end of each gene and a common 3' primer (Fig. 1A). The Expand Long Template PCR System (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) was used to ensure fidelity of the PCR reactions and to minimize strand transfers during amplification. PCR products were sequenced in their entirety to identify mutations that confer herbicide resistance and modifications at the ZFN cut site.
DNA donors
Tail-PCR was used to amplify and clone a 7.8 kb genomic DNA fragment encompassing the SuRB locus. Oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis was used to introduce mutations that confer herbicide resistance and silent nucleotide changes that distinguish HR events from spontaneous mutants (Fig. 1). Numbers specifying mutations and target sites are referenced with respect to GenBank accession X07645.
Three donor DNA pairs were constructed, each truncated 59 bp into the coding sequence. Truncation prevented herbicide resistance due to random integration of the donor DNA. pDW1963 and pDW1964 carry the P191A mutation; the latter has the 815 ZFN cut site mutated. pDW1927 and pDW1968 carry the W568L mutation; the latter has the 1853 ZFN cut site mutated. pDW1969 and pDW1972 have the S647T mutation; the latter has the 2163 ZFN site mutated. Donor DNAs are referred to by the mutation they carry (e.g. W568L); `m' indicates donors with mutated cut sites (e.g. W568L-m).
Yeast assay
To test whether zinc finger arrays (ZFAs) function as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), a yeast-based recombination assay was developed similar to ones previously reported.17,18 Our assay uses a derivative of the E. coli lacZ gene with a 125 bp duplication of coding sequence. The sequence duplication flanks a URA3 gene and a polylinker for cloning the target sequence being tested (Supplementary Fig. 2A). After cleavage of the target sequence by the ZFN, recombination between the lacZ sequence duplication results in loss of URA3 (conferring 5-fluoroorotic acid resistance). Recombination also reconstitutes a functional lacZ gene, enabling quantitative measurements of enzyme activity that reflect frequencies of recombination.
A two-step process is used to construct yeast reporter plasmids. First, complementary oligonucleotides corresponding to the target site are cloned into the polylinker of plasmid pDW1666, which has the 3' half of the lacZ gene. Secondly, a 2.5 kb NcoI to ApaI fragment from the pDW1666 derivative is inserted into the BspHI and ApaI sites of either plasmid pDW1714 or pDW1742. These latter plasmids contain the 5' half of the lacZ gene, a TRP1 marker, and either the 2μ origin of replication (pDW1714) or a yeast centromere (CEN) (pDW1742). Reporter plasmids are introduced into the yeast strain YPH500 (MATα) and grown on synthetic complete medium lacking tryptophan and uracil (SC-W-U). The medium is adjusted to pH 7.0 and includes X-gal as previously described.17
pDW1789 is used to express ZFNs in yeast from the TEF1 promoter. ZFAs are cloned into a polylinker to generate FokI nuclease fusions. The expression plasmid has a HIS3 gene and a CEN, and is introduced into YPH499 (MATa). The transformed yeast strain is plated on SC medium lacking histidine (SC-H).
Quantitative β-galactosidase assays are performed by growing a white yeast colony carrying the target plasmid and a colony with the ZFN expression plasmid overnight at 30 C in liquid SC-H or SC-W-U media, respectively. The cultures are adjusted to the same OD600, and 100 μl of each are added to 10 ml of yeast peptone dextrose (YPD) medium and cultured at 30 C for 20 to 26 hours. An aliquot of cells is harvested and quantitative β-galactosidase assays are performed as described17. Enzyme activity is normalized to cell number17.
Plant ZFN expression vectors
ZFA::FokI fusions that recognize left and right half-sites of a given target are expressed in plant cells from a single plasmid. Expression plasmids are constructed in two steps: one ZFA is cloned as an XbaI/BamHI fragment into a polylinker in pDW1876; the second ZFA is cloned as an XbaI/BamHI fragment into a polylinker in pDW1895. The polylinkers in both pDW1876 and pDW1895 are flanked by CaMV 35S promoters and NOS transcriptional terminators. To make a duel ZFN expression plasmid, both plasmids are digested with ApaLI and AvrII. The fragment encoding the ZFN from the pDW1985 derivative is then cloned into the ApaLI to AvrII sites of the pDW1876 derivative. The above plasmids use the wild type FokI nuclease, and two variants (pDW2000 and pDW2001) express the obligate heterodimeric form of FokI to reduce cellular toxicity18. All the FokI nucleases were codon-optimized for expression in plants. pDW998 was used to identify transformed tobacco protoplasts. It carries a neomycin phosphotransferase gene (NPTII) expressed from a CaMV 35S promoter.
Tests of ZFN toxicity
To evaluate whether ZFN toxicity impacts the recovery of gene targeting events, aliquots of protoplasts were transformed with plasmids expressing the 815 ZFN with either the homodimeric or heterodimeric form of FokI nuclease (see Methods Summary and Supplementary Table 7). The 815 ZFNs were separately electroporated with the three donor DNAs. Selection was imposed on the cells (see Methods Summary) to identify possible recombinants. An aliquot of the culture was grown in the absence of selection, and plating efficiency was calculated by determining the number of calli that formed in the absence of selection relative to the total number of protoplasts treated.
Pyrosequencing to monitor NHEJ
Tobacco protoplasts were transformed with DNA encoding the 815, 1853 or 2163 ZFNs as described in the Methods Summary, except that 30 μg of ZFN-encoding DNA was used. For each of the target sites, four aliquots (experimental replicates) of protoplasts were transformed. An aliquot of protoplasts was also transformed with a ZFN derived from Zif268 to serve as a control. Forty-eight hours after transformation, DNA was prepared and the target sites were PCR-amplified with primers specific for given target sites and that amplify both SuRA and SuRB. The primers were bar-coded to distinguish the target sites, each of the experimental replicates, and the control. PCR products were gel purified and quantified using a Quant-iT PicoGreen kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Sequencing was carried out at the University of Iowa DNA Facility using the Roche 454 sequencer, yielding a total of 422,077 sequence reads. Sequences were parsed according to locus (SuRA, SuRB), target site (815, 1853, 2163), experimental replicate (Rep1 - Rep4), and control (Zif268). Analysis was limited to sequence reads showing size polymorphisms (indels) consistent with NHEJ-induced mutations. The frequency of indels was normalized to the Zif268 control as described in the text and the legend to Supplementary Table 3.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank M. Eichtinger for help in making ZFA reagents. This work was supported by grants to D.F.V from the National Science Foundation and to J.K.J. from the National Institutes of Health and the Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Pathology.
Footnotes
Full Methods and any associated references are available in the online version of the paper at www.nature.com/nature.
1. Bibikova M, Beumer K, Trautman JK, Carroll D. Enhancing gene targeting with designed zinc finger nucleases. Science. 2003;300:764. [PubMed]
2. Porteus MH, Baltimore D. Chimeric nucleases stimulate gene targeting in human cells. Science. 2003;300:763. [PubMed]
3. Lloyd A, Plaisier CL, Carroll D, Drews GN. Targeted mutagenesis using zinc-finger nucleases in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005;102:2232–2237. [PubMed]
4. Wright DA, et al. High-frequency homologous recombination in plants mediated by zinc-finger nucleases. Plant J. 2005;44:693–705. [PubMed]
5. Lee KY, et al. The molecular basis of sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco. EMBO J. 1988;7:1241–1248. [PubMed]
6. Maeder ML, et al. Rapid “open-source” engineering of customized zinc-finger nucleases for highly efficient gene modification. Mol Cell. 2008;31:294–301. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Wright DA, et al. Standardized reagents and protocols for engineering zinc finger nucleases by modular assembly. Nature Protocols. 2006;1:1637–1652. [PubMed]
8. Ramirez CL, et al. Unexpected failure rates for modular assembly of engineered zinc fingers. Nat. Methods. 2008;5:374–375. [PubMed]
9. Segal DJ, Dreier B, Beerli RR, Barbas CF., 3rd Toward controlling gene expression at will: selection and design of zinc finger domains recognizing each of the 5'-GNN-3' DNA target sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999;96:2758–2763. [PubMed]
10. Pruett-Miller SM, Connelly JP, Maeder ML, Joung JK, Porteus MH. Comparison of zinc finger nucleases for use in gene targeting in mammalian cells. Mol. Ther. 2008;16:707–717. [PubMed]
11. Cornu TI, et al. DNA-binding specificity is a major determinant of the activity and toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases. Mol. Ther. 2008;16:352–358. [PubMed]
12. Ronaghi M, Uhlen M, Nyren P. A sequencing method based on real-time pyrophosphate. Science. 1998;281:363–365. [PubMed]
13. Tranel P, Wright T. Resistance of weeds to ALS-inhibiting herbicides: what have we learned? Weed Science. 2002;50:700–712.
14. Kaeppler SM, Kaeppler HF, Rhee Y. Epigenetic aspects of somoclonal variation in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000;43:179–188. [PubMed]
15. Szczepek M, et al. Structure-based redesign of the dimerization interface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007;25:786–793. [PubMed]
16. Miller JC, et al. An improved zinc-finger nuclease architecture for highly specific genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007;25:778–785. [PubMed]
17. Epinat JC, et al. A novel engineered meganuclease induces homologous recombination in yeast and mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:2952–2962. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Doyon Y, et al. Heritable targeted gene disruption in zebrafish using designed zinc-finger nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008;26:702–708. [PMC free article] [PubMed]