PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Clin Cancer Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC May 1, 2010.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2743312
NIHMSID: NIHMS120438
Estrous cycle modulates ovarian carcinoma growth
Guillermo N. Armaiz-Pena,1,3 Lingegowda S. Mangala,1 Whitney A. Spannuth,1 Yvonne G. Lin,1 Nicholas B. Jennings,1 Alpa M. Nick,1 Robert R. Langley,2 Rosemarie Schmandt,1 Susan K. Lutgendorf,4 Steven W. Cole,5 and Anil K. Sood1,2
1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030
2Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030
3Program in Cancer Biology, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030
4Department of Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 55241
5Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, 11-934 Factor Building, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90095
Correspondence and reprint requests Dr. Anil K. Sood, Professor Director, Ovarian Cancer Research Departments of Gynecologic Oncology and Cancer Biology The University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center 1155 Herman Pressler, Unit 1352 Houston, TX 77030 Phone: 713-745-5266 Fax: 713-792-7586 ; asood/at/mdanderson.org
Translational Relevance
The effects of reproductive hormones on ovarian cancer growth are not well understood. In this study, we examined the role of estrous cycle variation and specific reproductive hormones on ovarian cancer growth by utilizing in vitro and in vivo models. Our data suggest that estrogen promotes in vivo ovarian cancer growth, by making the tumor microenvironment more conducive for cancer growth. These findings offer new insights into the mechanisms underlying the effects of reproductive hormones on ovarian carcinoma and therein identify potential avenues for improvement in targeted therapies.
Purpose
The effects of reproductive hormones on ovarian cancer growth are not well understood. Here, we examined the effects of estrous cycle variation, and specific reproductive hormones on ovarian cancer growth.
Experimental Design
We investigated the role of reproductive hormones in ovarian cancer growth using both in vivo and in vitro models of tumor growth.
Results
In vivo experiments using the HeyA8 and SKOV3ip1 ovarian cancer models demonstrated that tumor cell inoculation during proestrus significantly increased tumor burden (251-273%) compared to injection during the estrus phase. Treatment of ovariectomized mice with 17β-estradiol resulted in a 404-483% increase in tumor growth compared to controls. Progestins had no significant effect, but did block estrogen-stimulated tumor growth. Tumors collected from mice sacrificed during proestrus showed increased levels of VEGF and microvessel density compared to mice injected during estrus. HeyA8, SKOV3ip1 and mouse endothelial (MOEC) cells expressed estrogen receptor (ER) α and β and progesterone receptor (PR) at the protein and mRNA level, while 2774 ovarian cancer cells were ER negative. In vitro assays demonstrated that 17β-estradiol significantly increased ovarian cancer cell adhesion to collagen in ER positive, but not in ER negative cells. Additionally, 17β-estradiol increased the migratory potential of MOEC cells, which was abrogated by the MAPK inhibitor, PD 09859. Treatment with 17β-estradiol activated MAPK in MOEC cells, but not in HeyA8 or SKOV3ip1 cells.
Conclusion
Our data suggest that estrogen may promote in vivo ovarian cancer growth, both directly and indirectly, by making the tumor microenvironment more conducive for cancer growth.
Keywords: Estrogen, ovarian cancer, angiogenesis, estrous cycle
There is growing evidence that the menstrual cycle, through variation of reproductive hormone levels, can affect tumor growth and metastasis (1-4). While this observation is best characterized in breast cancer patients, it likely impacts the behavior of tumors in women with gynecologic tumors, such as ovarian cancer as well. Premenopausal breast cancer patients who undergo surgery during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle have higher disease-free intervals and better overall survival rates than those who had surgery during other phases of the cycle (5, 6). However, the mechanisms underlying this observation are not clearly understood. It is known that in the follicular phase, higher levels of estrogen can alter some aspects of immune response, reduce phagocytic activity and increase growth factor levels, potentially increasing the growth and spread of cancer cells (7). Obese patients, who produce more peripheral aromatase, have higher estrogen levels when compared to thin patients and this fact has been suggested to contribute to a higher risk for developing premenopausal breast cancer (8, 9). Furthermore, higher circulating levels of estrogen are known to increase angiogenesis by promoting expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (3, 10-13). Conversely, in the luteal phase, the increase in circulating progesterone may decrease the proliferation of normal and tumor tissue and increase intercellular cohesion resulting in reduced tumor growth and decreased metastatic potential (14, 15). Progesterone has also been found to reduce the number of estrogen receptors expressed on myoepithelial breast cells, which can potentially result in apoptosis (16). Both clinical and preclinical studies suggest that ER negative cancers still depend on reproductive hormones for their formation and progression by influencing tumor associated endothelial cells (17-20).
Paralleling clinical findings, there is some preclinical evidence that timing of the estrous cycle can affect cancer growth and metastasis (1-4). For example, in preclinical breast cancer models, a 96% surgical cure rate is noted with resection during the estrus phase, when progesterone is the dominant hormone. Conversely, surgical cure rates drop to 33% when the tumor was resected during proestrus, when estrogen levels peak (2, 3). Additionally, in a preclinical melanoma model, a third of the mice injected during metestrus developed ovarian metastases, while no such metastases were found in mice injected during proestrus (4). These results suggest a possible role for circulating reproductive hormones in modulating the growth and metastatic spread of cancer cells.
Based on the paucity of information regarding the effects of reproductive hormones in ovarian cancer growth and progression, we examined the in vivo effects of variations in estrous cycle on ovarian cancer growth and progression. In addition, we tested the effects of pharmacological exogenous estrogen and progestin therapy in tumor-bearing ovariectomized animals.
Reagents
Unless otherwise indicated, chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
Cell lines and culture
HeyA8, SKOV3ip1 and 2774 epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines were maintained as previously described (21, 22). The cells were cultured in phenol red-free RPMI-1640 supplemented with 15% charcoal stripped fetal bovine serum and 0.1% gentamicin sulfate (Gemini Bioproducts, Calabasas, CA) at 37°C in 5% CO2/95% air. The derivation and characterization of murine ovarian endothelial cells (a kind gift of Dr. Robert Langley, Department of Cancer Biology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) have been described previously (23). MOEC cells were cultured in phenol red free DMEM supplemented with 10% charcoal stripped fetal bovine serum and 0.1% gentamicin sulfate at 33°C in 5% CO2/95% air. In vitro studies were performed with 70% to 80% confluent cultures.
Characterization of the estrous cycle
Female athymic mice (NCr-nu) were purchased from the National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center (Frederick, MD). The mice were housed 5 per cage on a 12-h day/night light cycle and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions in facilities approved by the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care and in accordance with the current regulations and standards of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the NIH. All studies were approved and supervised by the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. All mice used in these experiments were 8-10 weeks old. To avoid periods of anestrous and to synchronize the estrous cycle, female mice were exposed to bedding containing male urine prior to the start of the experiments (24). To determine the estrous cycle phase, vaginal sampling took place daily 3-4 h after light onset for at least one full cycle before the experiments started and daily sampling continued throughout the experiment. Samples were obtained by vaginal lavage, the washout deposited on a glass slide, mixed with a drop of Gill's No. 3 hematoxylin, and coverslipped. Slides were examined using light microscopy and estrous phase determined based on standard vaginal cytology (Fig. 1a).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Inoculation of tumor cells into the peritoneal cavity of mice during proestrus results in higher tumor weights and nodule formation. A) Characterization of the estrous cycle in nude mice by vaginal cytology. In vivo effects of the estrous cycle on tumor (more ...)
Orthotopic in vivo model of ovarian cancer
Animals determined to be in either proestrus or estrus were injected intraperitoneally (ip) with either SKOV3ip1 (1 × 106 cells per 0.2 mL HBSS; Life Technologies Invitrogen), or HeyA8 cells (2.5 × 105 cells per 0.2 mL HBSS). For in vivo experiments, cells were collected by trypsinization and centrifugation at 1,100 rpm for 7 min at 4°C. Cells were then washed twice in PBS before being reconstituted in HBSS. Only single-cell suspensions with >95% viability, as determined by trypan blue exclusion, were used for the in vivo injections. Mice (n = 10 per group) were sacrificed on day 28 (HeyA8) or day 35 (SKOV3ip1). Total body weight, tumor incidence and mass, and the number of tumor nodules were recorded. Tumors were either fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin or snap frozen in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA) in liquid nitrogen.
Hormone replacement therapy
Anesthetized nude female mice underwent bilateral ovariectomy. The animals were then allowed to recover for 2 weeks to remove residual estrogen and progesterone from the body and to allow inflammation to subside. For the first study, slow-release pumps (Alzet Osmotic Pumps, Cupertino, CA) containing water-soluble 17β-estradiol (28 μg/day), water-soluble progesterone (167 μg/day), β-cyclodextrin (carrier molecule for water-soluble hormones) or a combination of 17β-estradiol and progesterone were introduced subcutaneously 3 days before SKOV3ip1 cells were injected i.p. into mice. Mice were sacrificed 31 days after tumor cell inoculation. To validate our findings a similar experiment was performed in the HeyA8 model. In this experiment, mice were treated with water-soluble 17β-estradiol, daily megestrol acetate (250βg/day), β-cyclodextrin or a combination of 17β-estradiol and megestrol acetate. Mice were sacrificed 28 days after tumor cell inoculation.
Immunoprecipitation
All Western blot analyses for ERβ expression were completed after immunoprecipitation with anti-ERβ (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA). Briefly, 500 μg of protein in a total volume of 650 μL of modified RIPA lysis buffer with protease inhibitor was allowed to incubate with 7 μL of anti-ERβ antibody overnight in 4°C. Subsequently, 50 μL of purified 50% protein G agarose slurry (Upstate Cell Signaling Solutions, Lake Placid, NY) was added to the samples and rotated for 2 hours in 4°C. This was followed by three sequential washings with modified RIPA lysis buffer. Finally, an appropriate amount of 3X Laemmli's sample buffer was added and boiled for 5 minutes. Anti-ERβ antibody was used at a 1:1,000 dilution, and visualized using anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase at 1:1,000 dilution (Amersham Biosciences UK Limited, Buckinghamshire, England).
Western blot analysis
Cell lysates were prepared by washing cells with PBS and incubated for 10 min at 4°C in modified RIPA lysis buffer. Cells were scraped from plates, centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was stored at -80°C. Protein concentrations were determined using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay reagent kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL), and 50 μg of whole cell lysate were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE separation. Samples were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane by wet electrophoresis (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), blocked with 5% nonfat milk in TBST for 1h at room temperature, and incubated with 1 μg/mL of anti-ERα, anti-phosphorylated MAP kinase (MAPK) or anti-MAPK overnight at 4°C. Primary antibody was detected with anti-rabbit IgG linked to HRP (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ), and developed with an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL).
Reverse transcriptase PCR
Total RNA was isolated from MOEC and ovarian cancer cells using Qiagen RNAeasy kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA). Next, cDNA was synthesized from 5 μg of total RNA using the Superscript First-Strand Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) as per the manufacturer's instructions. The cDNA was subjected to PCR using specific primers (Table 1) along with β-actin as a housekeeping gene. PCR was performed with 1 μg of reverse-transcribed RNA and 100 ng/μL of sense and antisense primers in a total volume of 20 μL. Each cycle consisted of 45 seconds at 94°C for denaturing the sample, 1 min of annealing at varying temperatures (Table 1) and 45 seconds of elongation at 72°C (35 cycles). Amplified PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel with Tris-borate-EDTA buffer and visualized under UV light after staining with ethidium bromide.
Table 1
Table 1
Primer sequences and PCR strategy used in this study
Adhesion assay
HeyA8 and SKOV3ip1 cells (5 × 104) were plated on a 96-well plate pre-coated with either collagen 1 (20 μg/mL) or 2% denatured BSA. At the time of seeding, cells were exposed to 100 nM of 17β-estradiol and incubated for 60 min at 37°C. Non-adherent cells were removed by washing wells with PBS. Adherent cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. Adherent cells were quantified by counting the number of attached cells per 40X HPF over 5 randomly selected fields.
Migration assay
Viable MOEC cells (cell viability determined by trypan blue exclusion) were resuspended in serum-free medium (1 × 105 cells per mL), and 1 mL was added to the upper wells of a membrane invasion culture system as previously described (25). A 0.1% gelatin-coated membrane separated the upper wells from the lower wells, which were filled with serum-free media that lacked (control) or contained 17β-estradiol, PD 09859 or a combination. The membrane culture system was incubated for 6 hours at 37°C. Cells that had migrated into the bottom wells were removed and collected in 0.1% EDTA, loaded onto a 3.0-μm polycarbonate filter (Osmonics, Livermore, CA) using a Minifold I Dot-Blot System (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, NH), and fixed, stained, and counted by light microscopy, as previously described (26). The cells in 10 randomly chosen fields (x400 final magnification) were counted.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
CD31 IHC was performed on freshly cut frozen tissue. Briefly, slides were fixed in cold acetone and then incubated with anti-CD31 [platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM-1)] antibody (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA). Microvessel density (MVD) was quantified by counting the number of microvessels per 200X HPF over 10 randomly selected 0.159-mm2 fields. A microvessel was defined as a discrete CD31+ cluster or single cell adjacent to a lumen. VEGF IHC analyses were performed as previously described (27). Briefly, after deparaffinization and rehydration, antigen retrieval was performed using pepsin in a 37°C humidified incubator. Endogenous peroxidases and nonspecific epitopes were blocked with 3% H2O2/methanol and 5% normal horse serum with 1% normal goat serum, respectively. Slides were then incubated with the appropriate primary antibody at 1:100 in blocking solution overnight at 4°C. After incubating with the appropriate secondary antibody conjugated to HRP, detection was achieved with DAB substrate and counterstained with Gill's No. 3 hematoxylin.
Statistical analyses
For in vivo experiments, differences in continuous variables (mean body weight, tumor weight and MVD) were analyzed using the Student's t-test for comparing two groups and by ANOVA for multiple group comparisons with p <0.05 considered statistically significant. For values that were not normally distributed, the Mann-Whitney rank sum test was used. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for all statistical analyses.
Effect of estrous cycle timing on ovarian cancer growth
Prior to examining the effects of estrous cycle variation on cancer growth, we first characterized the duration of estrous cycle in nude mice. Daily vaginal smears were obtained and analyzed by cytology (Figure 1A). The diestrus phase was characterized by few cells and occasional epithelial cells, while proestrus was defined by the presence of more than 75% of nucleated epithelial cells. Metestrus was characterized by the presence of approximately equal proportions of nucleated epithelial cells and anucleated cornified epithelial cells. Estrus was defined as more than 75% of anucleated cornified epithelial cells.
To account for variability in the estrous cycle, we sought to synchronize the cycle prior to assessing effects on tumor growth. Therefore, mice were maintained for two weeks in cages pretreated with male urine. After this period, the estrous cycle was synchronized, as determined by daily vaginal cytology (data not shown). After this pretreatment, mice were injected i.p. with either SKOV3ip1 or HeyA8 ovarian cancer cells (n=10 mice/group) during either proestrus or estrus. Three to four weeks after tumor cell injection, the animals were sacrificed and a necropsy was performed. In the HeyA8 tumor model, mice injected during proestrus showed a 251% increase in tumor weight accompanied by a 178% increase in tumor nodules compared to the group injected in estrus (p = 0.01; Fig. 1B). Similar results were obtained in the SKOV3ip1 tumor model where tumor weight was increased by 273% and tumor nodules by 196% when mice were injected with tumor cells in proestrus compared to estrus (Fig. 1C).
Effects of 17β-estradiol on ovarian cancer growth
Based on the increased tumor growth observed with tumor cell injection in proestrus, we next asked whether the increased tumor growth was related to higher estrogen levels. To answer this question, we administered estrogen or progesterone to tumor bearing mice following bilateral ovariectomy. Treatment with 17β-estradiol alone resulted in 404% increase in tumor weight in the SKOV3ip1 model compared to treatment with the β-cyclodextrin control (p<0.01; Fig. 2A). While progesterone alone did not have any effect on tumor growth, combination of progesterone with 17β-estradiol restored tumor burden levels to near control levels (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, we did not see any significant differences in tumor nodule counts (data not shown) in this model after hormone treatment. To confirm our findings a second experiment was performed utilizing the HeyA8 model. In this experiment, 17β-estradiol treatment resulted in a 483% increase in tumor weight compared to controls (p<0.01; Fig. 2B). Consistent with the SKOV3ip1 model, the combination of megestrol acetate with 17β-estradiol restored tumor burden to near control levels (Fig. 2B). Similar effects were noted on the number of tumor nodules (data not shown).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effects of reproductive hormones on ovarian cancer growth and angiogenesis. Following recovery from ovariectomy, mice received either 17β-estradiol, progestin, or combination treatment. After three days of treatment, mice were injected with either (more ...)
Proestrus promotes angiogenesis
To explore possible mechanisms that might explain the increase in tumor growth resulting from inoculation of tumor cells during proestrus, we examined whether angiogenesis was affected. MVD was calculated following CD31 staining of tumors from each group. Mice injected in proestrus showed a 191% increase in MVD when compared to that of the estrus group (p < 0.05; Fig. 2C). Since it is known that VEGF is an important mediator of angiogenesis and that it is increased in proestrus, we examined its expression in tumor samples. VEGF levels were increased in tumors harvested from mice that were sacrificed in proestrus, compared to mice sacrificed in estrus (Fig. 2D).
Hormone receptor expression in tumor and endothelial cells
To examine whether the effects of estrogen on tumor growth might be direct (tumor cells) or indirect (microenvironment), we next analyzed the expression of ERα, ERβ and PR mRNA in the HeyA8, SKOV3ip1, 2774 and murine ovarian endothelial cells (MOEC) using RT-PCR. All cell lines expressed ERα, ERβ and PR (Fig 3A), meanwhile 2774 cells did not expressed either ER (data not shown). Furthermore, Western blot analysis showed that all HeyA8, SKOV3ip1 and MOEC cells expressed ERα, ERβ and PR at the protein level (Fig. 3B).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Hormone receptor expression in tumor and endothelial cell. A) mRNA expression of ER α, ER β and PR in HeyA8, SKOV3ip1 and MOEC cells. B) Western blot analyses show that all three cell lines expressed all three receptors.
17β-estradiol increases tumor cell adhesion to collagen coated plates
Given the observed effects of estrous phase on the number of nodules, we next asked whether estrogen might affect cell adhesion, thereby enhancing metastatic spread. Results showed that 100 nM 17β-estradiol increased the collagen-adhesive potential of HeyA8 cells by 30% and SKOV3ip1 cells by 38% (p<0.01) but not in ER-negative 2774 cells (Fig. 4A). These effects could be detected with 17β-estradiol levels as low as 100 pM (Fig. 4A).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Estrogen increases ovarian cancer cell adhesion, endothelial cell migration and activates MAPK in endothelial cells. A) Effect of 17β-estradiol on the adhesive potential of HeyA8, SKOV3ip1 and 2774 cells to collagen I was assessed. B) Effect of (more ...)
17β-estradiol increases the migratory potential of endothelial cells through activation of the MAPK pathway
It is known that estrogen can cause the activation of the MAPK pathway (28-30). Specifically, it has been shown in various endothelial cell lines that estrogen-induced activation of the MAPK pathway might play a role in endothelial cell migration (31, 32). We next examined whether estrogen treatment activates MAPK in ovarian cancer and endothelial cells. Phospho-MAPK levels were significantly increased by 17β-estradiol in MOEC cells, but did not change significantly at any time point tested in HeyA8 or SKOV3ip1 cells (Fig. 4B). Total MAPK levels remained unchanged in all cases. Based on growing information regarding the role of estrogen on endothelial cell migration, we assessed in vitro migration using the membrane invasion culture system assay. 17β-estradiol increased the migratory ability of MOEC cells by 2.5-fold when compared to controls (p<0.02; Fig. 4C). To evaluate the functional role of MAPK, we treated cells with 20 μM PD 90859 (MAPK inhibitor) with or without 17β-estradiol. PD 90859 abrogated 17β-estradiol mediated induction of endothelial cell migration (Fig. 4C).
The key finding of this study is that hormonal variations during the estrous cycle can affect ovarian cancer growth and progression. We found that inoculation of mice during proestrus results in enhanced tumor growth. This effect was also seen in tumor-bearing ovariectomized mice treated with exogenous estrogen. Additionally, we showed that progestins could abrogate estrogen induced cancer growth. These observations are further supported by the inhibitory effects of progestins on in vivo and in vitro growth of some cancers, including ovarian cancer (33-36). Furthermore, mechanistic studies performed in our laboratory reveal that estrogen promotes angiogenesis, endothelial cell migration and tumor cell adhesion.
An association between the reproductive cycle and malignant progression has long been suspected (1-6). In the present study, we sought to identify direct and indirect processes and pathways that link the estrous cycle to malignant cell behavior in ovarian carcinomas. Both estrogen and progesterone serve as dominant reproductive hormones in the menstrual cycle and are therefore likely key mediators in this process. Proestrus is associated with higher levels of estrogen, whereas estrus is characterized by decreased estrogen (3). Consistent with estrogen induction of VEGF production by endothelial and ovarian cancer cells (10-13, 37-39), we find that VEGF levels are increased at the tumor level during proestrus. In other models, estrogen-induced VEGF production was attributed to ERα and ERβ activity at the transcriptional level (40). Specifically, it was found that ERα and ERβ could bind to estrogen response elements near the transcriptional start site of the VEGF gene (40). Also reminiscent of previous observations in other tumor systems (41), we found that estrogen can increase the migratory potential of tumor-associated endothelial cells and this process is mediated by activation of the MAPK signaling pathway. These two mechanisms suggest that estrogen may increase the angiogenic potential of the tumor microenvironment by increasing VEGF secretion and increasing endothelial cell migration.
In our study, we found more tumor nodules in mice inoculated during the proestrus phase of the menstrual cycle, suggesting that estrogen promotes metastatic colonization by increasing the adhesive potential of cancer cells to extracellular matrix proteins. This finding is supported by other observations related to the role of estrogen in enhancing endothelial cell adhesion to extracellular matrix proteins (42). Although the effect of estrogen on ovarian cancer cell adhesion is not well known, it has been studied in other gynecologic diseases. In an orthotopic mouse model of endometriosis, pre-treatment with estrogen resulted in a higher percentage of animals developing endometriotic-like nodules, while treatment with progesterone alone did not affect implantation rates (43).
MAPK has been suggested to play a major role in cell migration, proliferation, differentiation and survival (44). In some experimental models, estrogen has been shown to activate MAPK (28-30). For example, various studies have shown that estrogen induced porcine aortic endothelial cells (PAEC) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) migration and data suggest that this effect is mediated by MAPK (31, 32). Thus, we examined whether estrogen treatment resulted in MAPK activation in ovarian cancer and endothelial cells. Incubation with estrogen at a dose known to reflect the physiologic conditions in the ovary was not effective in activating MAPK in either of the human ovarian cancer cells we tested (45). However, estrogen treatment rapidly increased the levels of activated MAPK in murine ovarian endothelial cells. These data suggest that estrogen impacts tumor biology by stimulating endothelial cells in the tumor microenvironment. Our finding is further supported by data that suggests that estrogen can promote tumor growth even in ER-negative breast cancer models (17-20).
Progesterone is the dominant hormone during the estrus phase of the menstrual cycle. Fluctuations in progesterone levels could serve as another plausible reason for the differences in ovarian tumor growth observed in our study. Progesterone has been found to cause apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells in vitro and to reduce the tumorigenic capacity of cells inoculated into the peritoneal cavity of mice (46, 47). Pretreatment with progesterone has been shown to reduce the number of tumor implants and metastases, thus prolonging the animal life span (46). Additionally, long-term progesterone treatment of ovarian cancer cells was able to suppress the transformed phenotype as indicated by the acquisition of contact inhibition and loss of anchorage-independence (48). Our observations of decreased tumor growth in the progestin treated arms validate these findings in the literature and could serve as an explanation for the protective effect of progesterone in ovarian cancer.
Some studies have shown that estrogen can promote ovarian cancer cell proliferation, motility, invasion, and reduce apoptosis (49-52). However, tamoxifen treatment is effective even in ER negative ovarian cancers, suggesting that other factors might be responsible for decreased tumor growth (53). In contrast, progesterone treatment inhibits cell growth, invasion and promotes apoptosis (46, 54-59). Our findings extend previous work in that the effects of reproductive hormones were found to be mediated via the tumor and endothelial cells.
In summary, we have shown that the timing of ovarian cancer cell inoculation within the estrous cycle modulates the growth of ovarian cancer cells. In addition, we have identified that the reproductive hormone mileu functions as a key predictor of ovarian tumor progression. These results show that cancer cell growth and angiogenesis are highly coordinated within the estrous cycle, raising the possibility that the effectiveness of therapeutic strategies might depend in part upon when in the reproductive cycle they are used.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Donna Reynolds and Carol Oborn for assistance with immunohistochemistry.
Financial support This work was funded through the NCI F31CA126474 Fellowship for Minority Students award to GNA-P; NCI T32 Academic Gynecologic Oncologist Training Grant to WAS, YGL and AMN; and NIH grants (CA109298 and CA110793), the Marcus Foundation, the Betty Ann Asche Murray Distinguished Professorship, and the U.T. M.D. Anderson SPORE in ovarian cancer (P50CA083639) to AKS.
1. Wood PA, Hrushesky WJ. Sex cycle modulates cancer growth. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;91:95–102. [PubMed]
2. Bove K, Lincoln DW, Wood PA, Hrushesky WJ. Fertility cycle influence on surgical breast cancer cure. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002;75:65–72. [PubMed]
3. Wood PA, Bove K, You S, Chambers A, Hrushesky WJ. Cancer growth and spread are saltatory and phase-locked to the reproductive cycle through mediators of angiogenesis. Mol Cancer Ther. 2005;4:1065–75. [PubMed]
4. Vantyghem SA, Postenka CO, Chambers AF. Estrous cycle influences organ-specific metastasis of B16F10 melanoma cells. Cancer Res. 2003;63:4763–5. [PubMed]
5. Hrushesky WJ, Bluming AZ, Gruber SA, Sothern RB. Menstrual influence on surgical cure of breast cancer. Lancet. 1989;2:949–52. [PubMed]
6. Hagen AA, Hrushesky WJ. Menstrual timing of breast cancer surgery. Am J Surg. 1998;175:245–61. [PubMed]
7. Hrushesky WJ, Gruber SA, Sothern RB, et al. Natural killer cell activity: age, estrousand circadian-stage dependence and inverse correlation with metastatic potential. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988;80:1232–7. [PubMed]
8. Ryan KJ. Biochemistry of aromatase: significance to female reproductive physiology. Cancer Res. 1982;42:3342s–4s. [PubMed]
9. Ursin G, Longnecker MP, Haile RW, Greenland S. A meta-analysis of body mass index and risk of premenopausal breast cancer. Epidemiology. 1995;6:137–41. [PubMed]
10. Hyder SM, Huang JC, Nawaz Z, et al. Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression by estrogens and progestins. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108(Suppl 5):785–90. [PubMed]
11. Hyder SM, Nawaz Z, Chiappetta C, Stancel GM. Identification of functional estrogen response elements in the gene coding for the potent angiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor. Cancer Res. 2000;60:3183–90. [PubMed]
12. Cullinan-Bove K, Koos RD. Vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor expression in the rat uterus: rapid stimulation by estrogen correlates with estrogen-induced increases in uterine capillary permeability and growth. Endocrinology. 1993;133:829–37. [PubMed]
13. Li H, Sun H. [Effect of estrogen and progesterone on the expression of VEGF mRNA in epithelial ovarian cancer cell line] Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2004;26:264–7. [PubMed]
14. Navarrete MA, Maier CM, Falzoni R, et al. Assessment of the proliferative, apoptotic and cellular renovation indices of the human mammary epithelium during the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7:R306–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Soderqvist G, Isaksson E, von Schoultz B, Carlstrom K, Tani E, Skoog L. Proliferation of breast epithelial cells in healthy women during the menstrual cycle. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176:123–8. [PubMed]
16. Ramakrishnan R, Khan SA, Badve S. Morphological changes in breast tissue with menstrual cycle. Mod Pathol. 2002;15:1348–56. [PubMed]
17. Gupta PB, Proia D, Cingoz O, et al. Systemic stromal effects of estrogen promote the growth of estrogen receptor-negative cancers. Cancer Res. 2007;67:2062–71. [PubMed]
18. Rebbeck TR, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL, et al. Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1616–22. [PubMed]
19. Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapy. 133 randomised trials involving 31,000 recurrences and 24,000 deaths among 75,000 women. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1992;339:1–15. [PubMed]
20. Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapy. 133 randomised trials involving 31,000 recurrences and 24,000 deaths among 75,000 women. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1992;339:71–85. [PubMed]
21. Nilsson MB, Armaiz-Pena G, Takahashi R, et al. Stress hormones regulate interleukin-6 expression by human ovarian carcinoma cells through a Src-dependent mechanism. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:29919–26. [PubMed]
22. Spannuth WA, Nick AM, Jennings NB, et al. Functional significance of VEGFR-2 on ovarian cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:1045–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Langley RR, Ramirez KM, Tsan RZ, Van Arsdall M, Nilsson MB, Fidler IJ. Tissuespecific microvascular endothelial cell lines from H-2K(b)-tsA58 mice for studies of angiogenesis and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2003;63:2971–6. [PubMed]
24. Jemiolo B, Harvey S, Novotny M. Promotion of the Whitten effect in female mice by synthetic analogs of male urinary constituents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83:4576–9. [PubMed]
25. Hendrix MJ, Seftor EA, Seftor RE, Fidler IJ. A simple quantitative assay for studying the invasive potential of high and low human metastatic variants. Cancer Lett. 1987;38:137–47. [PubMed]
26. Sood AK, Bhatty R, Kamat AA, et al. Stress hormone-mediated invasion of ovarian cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:369–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Kamat AA, Merritt WM, Coffey D, et al. Clinical and biological significance of vascular endothelial growth factor in endometrial cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:7487–95. [PubMed]
28. Fu XD, Cui YH, Lin GP, Wang TH. Non-genomic effects of 17beta-estradiol in activation of the ERK1/ERK2 pathway induces cell proliferation through upregulation of cyclin D1 expression in bovine artery endothelial cells. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2007;23:131–7. [PubMed]
29. Klinge CM, Blankenship KA, Risinger KE, et al. Resveratrol and estradiol rapidly activate MAPK signaling through estrogen receptors alpha and beta in endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:7460–8. [PubMed]
30. Choi KC, Auersperg N, Leung PC. Mitogen-activated protein kinases in normal and (pre)neoplastic ovarian surface epithelium. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003;1:71. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Sengupta K, Banerjee S, Saxena NK, Banerjee SK. Thombospondin-1 disrupts estrogen-induced endothelial cell proliferation and migration and its expression is suppressed by estradiol. Mol Cancer Res. 2004;2:150–8. [PubMed]
32. Geraldes P, Sirois MG, Bernatchez PN, Tanguay JF. Estrogen regulation of endothelial and smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation: role of p38 and p42/44 mitogen-activated protein kinase. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22:1585–90. [PubMed]
33. Pasqualini JR, Ebert C. Biological effects of progestins in breast cancer. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1999;13(Suppl 4):11–9. [PubMed]
34. Zhang K, Chow PK. The effect of megestrol acetate on growth of HepG2 cells in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:5226–32. [PubMed]
35. Oberhoff C, Hoffmann O, Winkler UH, Schindler AE. Hemostatic effects of high-dose megestrol acetate therapy in patients with advanced gynecological cancer. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2001;15:341–8. [PubMed]
36. Wilailak S, Linasmita V, Srisupundit S. Phase II study of high-dose megestrol acetate in platinum-refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. Anticancer Drugs. 2001;12:719–24. [PubMed]
37. Garvin S, Nilsson UW, Dabrosin C. Effects of oestradiol and tamoxifen on VEGF, soluble VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2 in breast cancer and endothelial cells. Br J Cancer. 2005;93:1005–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Garvin S, Nilsson UW, Huss FR, Kratz G, Dabrosin C. Estradiol increases VEGF in human breast studied by whole-tissue culture. Cell Tissue Res. 2006;325:245–51. [PubMed]
39. Hicklin DJ, Ellis LM. Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1011–27. [PubMed]
40. Mueller MD, Vigne JL, Minchenko A, Lebovic DI, Leitman DC, Taylor RN. Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene transcription by estrogen receptors alpha and beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:10972–7. [PubMed]
41. Schnaper HW, McGowan KA, Kim-Schulze S, Cid MC. Oestrogen and endothelial cell angiogenic activity. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1996;23:247–50. [PubMed]
42. Cid MC, Esparza J, Schnaper HW, et al. Estradiol enhances endothelial cell interactions with extracellular matrix proteins via an increase in integrin expression and function. Angiogenesis. 1999;3:271–80. [PubMed]
43. Beliard A, Noel A, Goffin F, Frankenne F, Foidart JM. Role of endocrine status and cell type in adhesion of human endometrial cells to the peritoneum in nude mice. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:973–8. [PubMed]
44. Dhillon AS, Hagan S, Rath O, Kolch W. MAP kinase signalling pathways in cancer. Oncogene. 2007;26:3279–90. [PubMed]
45. Lindgren PR, Backstrom T, Cajander S, et al. The pattern of estradiol and progesterone differs in serum and tissue of benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Int J Oncol. 2002;21:583–9. [PubMed]
46. McDonnel AC, Van Kirk EA, Isaak DD, Murdoch WJ. Effects of progesterone on ovarian tumorigenesis in xenografted mice. Cancer Lett. 2005;221:49–53. [PubMed]
47. Ho SM. Estrogen, progesterone and epithelial ovarian cancer. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003;1:73. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Blumenthal M, Kardosh A, Dubeau L, Borok Z, Schonthal AH. Suppression of the transformed phenotype and induction of differentiation-like characteristics in cultured ovarian tumor cells by chronic treatment with progesterone. Mol Carcinog. 2003;38:160–9. [PubMed]
49. Galtier-Dereure F, Capony F, Maudelonde T, Rochefort H. Estradiol stimulates cell growth and secretion of procathepsin D and a 120-kilodalton protein in the human ovarian cancer cell line BG-1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;75:1497–502. [PubMed]
50. Choi KC, Kang SK, Tai CJ, Auersperg N, Leung PC. Estradiol up-regulates antiapoptotic Bcl-2 messenger ribonucleic acid and protein in tumorigenic ovarian surface epithelium cells. Endocrinology. 2001;142:2351–60. [PubMed]
51. Syed V, Ulinski G, Mok SC, Yiu GK, Ho SM. Expression of gonadotropin receptor and growth responses to key reproductive hormones in normal and malignant human ovarian surface epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2001;61:6768–76. [PubMed]
52. Song J, Fadiel A, Edusa V, et al. Estradiol-induced ezrin overexpression in ovarian cancer: a new signaling domain for estrogen. Cancer Lett. 2005;220:57–65. [PubMed]
53. Leung PC, Choi JH. Endocrine signaling in ovarian surface epithelium and cancer. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:143–62. [PubMed]
54. Bu SZ, Yin DL, Ren XH, et al. Progesterone induces apoptosis and up-regulation of p53 expression in human ovarian carcinoma cell lines. Cancer. 1997;79:1944–50. [PubMed]
55. Hu Z, Deng X. [The effect of progesterone on proliferation and apoptosis in ovarian cancer cell] Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2000;35:423–6. [PubMed]
56. Rodriguez GC, Nagarsheth NP, Lee KL, et al. Progestin-induced apoptosis in the Macaque ovarian epithelium: differential regulation of transforming growth factor-beta. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:50–60. [PubMed]
57. Syed V, Ho SM. Progesterone-induced apoptosis in immortalized normal and malignant human ovarian surface epithelial cells involves enhanced expression of FasL. Oncogene. 2003;22:6883–90. [PubMed]
58. McDonnel AC, Murdoch WJ. High-dose progesterone inhibition of urokinase secretion and invasive activity by SKOV-3 ovarian carcinoma cells: evidence for a receptor-independent nongenomic effect on the plasma membrane. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2001;78:185–91. [PubMed]
59. McDonnel AC, Van Kirk EA, Isaak DD, Murdoch WJ. Inhibitory effects of progesterone on plasma membrane fluidity and tumorigenic potential of ovarian epithelial cancer cells. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2003;228:308–14. [PubMed]