The various roles established for SED1/MFG-E8 immediately suggest a number of potential therapeutic opportunities. Oncological studies indicate that SED1/MFG-E8 is expressed and often up-regulated on the surface of breast carcinoma cells, and antibodies against the protein have met with some success in cancer diagnosis and therapy [
Larocca et al., 1991]. More recently, investigators have been successful in priming cytotoxic T cells to target SED1/MFG-E8-positive breast cancers [
Liu et al., 2005]. In this case, adeno-associated virus-based gene loading was used to delivery SED1/MFG-E8 to dendritic cells, which in turn presented the protein to cytotoxic T cells in the form of antigen/MHC complexes [
Liu et al., 2005]. Alternatively, fusion of the C-terminal domains of SED1/MFG-E8 to a tumor antigen has been found sufficient to target otherwise soluble antigen to secreted exosome-like vesicles [
Zeelenberg et al., 2008]. In this investigation, a vesicle-associated tumor antigen induced a stronger T cell-mediated immune response than did the same antigen secreted as a soluble protein. As a result, tumors secreting vesicle-associated antigens were slower growing, and a DNA-vaccine therapy featuring an antigen-SED1/MFG-E8 fusion construct had a protective effect, limiting tumor size in a mouse tumor progression model [
Zeelenberg et al., 2008].
As mentioned above, the clear involvement of SED1/MFG-E8, and its homolog Del1, in angiogenesis raises a number of intriguing possibilities regarding their potential clinical use. Investigators have already applied these observations to enhance recovery of ischemia in a rodent model. Finding that inappropriate activation of this pathway initiates angiogenesis in developing tumors also suggests that SED1/MFG-E8 antagonists could be used to arrest tumor growth. How the SED1/MFG-E8 antagonists will be targeted to the appropriate site is unclear, but workers have suggested that RGD-bearing chemotherapeutic agents could be targeted to the SED1/MFG-E8-dependent phagocytic activity of endothelial cells in angiogenic tumors [
Fens et al., 2008].
A number of studies also indicate that SED1/MFG-E8 expression is dramatically reduced during sepsis, and in at least one instance, exogenous administration SED1/MFG-E8 was able to reverse some of the cellular defects associated with sepsis [
Bu et al., 2007;
Miksa et al., 2007]. The decrease in SED1/MFG-E8 expression during sepsis is also associated with a decrease in clearance of apoptotic cells, an effect that can be partially rescued by the administration of SED1/MFG-E8-containing exosomes collected from immature DC. Exosome administration also leads to increased survival of septic animals [
Miksa et al., 2006]. In this regard, administration of the cytokine, fractalkine, to septic animals, induces SED1/MFG-E8 expression and enhances clearance of apoptotic cells [
Miksa et al., 2007].
A few other therapeutic applications of SED1/MFG-E8 are less well-defined, but none-the-less bare mentioning. One of the first reported functions for SED1/MFG-E8 in breast milk was to prevent rotavirus infection in breast-fed infants, and the protein has also been found to block enterotoxigenic
E. coli attachment to the intestinal villi of piglets [
Kvistgaard et al., 2004;
Newburg et al., 1998;
Shahriar et al., 2006]. Together, these data raise the possibility of supplementing formula with SED1/MFG-E8 to boost immunity for formula-fed children. SED1/MFG-E8 has also been utilized similarly to annexin V as a reagent for identifying apoptotic cells, and recent membrane-binding studies reveal that the affinity of SED1/MFG-E8 for phosphatidylserine-containing membranes is more than 100-fold greater than that of Factor VIII C2 [
Shao et al., 2008;
Shi and Gilbert, 2003;
Venegas and Zhou, 2007]. In fact, SED1/MFG-E8 directly competes for the phospholipid binding sites of Factor V and Factor VIII, therefore inhibiting prothrombinase and Xase complexes that are activated during the coagulation cascade [
Shi et al., 2008]. These data suggest SED1/MFG-E8, perhaps even the C2 domain alone, could serve as potent anti-coagulant, or alternatively, a targeting molecule directing a therapeutic-of-interest to phosphatidylserine-rich membranes [
Shao et al., 2008]. Furthermore, SED1/MFG-E8 plays multiple roles during sperm maturation and fertilization, and therefore opens the possibility of using SED1/MFG-E8 antagonists as potential contraceptive agents. Alternatively, since SED1/MFG-E8 is added to mature sperm post-mieotically, it may be possible to enhance the fertilizing potential of sperm with low fertilizing efficacy by the application of SED1/MFG-E8 during intercourse.
These are just a few of the rich possibilities that present themselves, reflecting the many distinct types of cellular interactions mediated by SED1/MFG-E8. Although all of these potential uses raise many more questions than they answer, it is clear that this unusual multi-domain protein offers much potential for research and therapeutics.