Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Opt Lett. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 September 7.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2738934

Photoacoustic Endoscopy


We have developed novel photoacoustic endoscopy with a miniaturized imaging probe. A light guiding optical fiber, an ultrasonic sensor, and a mechanical scanning unit are integrated to enable circumferential sector scanning, which produces B-scan images. Biological tissues, including the gastrointestinal tract of a rat, have been imaged ex vivo or in situ.

Photoacoustic tomography has great potential for in vivo medical applications because it is safe and has a high ratio of imaging depth to resolution [1-4]. It provides image information by detecting ultrasonic waves generated by absorbed energy impulses, typically laser pulses. Its deep imaging capability is attributed to its energy delivery mechanism, which uses diffused light that can penetrate up to several centimeters into soft tissue. Unfortunately, at large depths, imaging resolution can be inadequate. In such cases the photoacoustic probe must be positioned close to the area of interest by means of endoscopy.

Other optical imaging modalities, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and confocal microscopy, have already shown their endoscopic potential within penetrations limited by the transport mean free path (~1 mm in the skin) [5-7]; consequently, much interest has developed in the endoscopic embodiment of photoacoustic imaging. A photoacoustic endoscopic probe for 1D sensing was reported by Viator et al. [8] in 2001, and a more recent study [9] has presented photoacoustic images of a rabbit's blood vessels ex vivo utilizing an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) probe. The latter system, however, was not yet truly endoscopic because it used external light illumination.

A photoacoustic endoscopic system has to deliver light pulses, detect ultrasonic waves, and perform area or line scanning at the tip of a small probe. A flexible-shaft-based mechanical scanning mechanism can potentially be used for the scanning method, as is done in endoscopic ultrasonography [10] and OCT [5, 6]. However, unlike the thin single-mode fibers that are used in endoscopic OCT systems, the relatively thick multimode optical fibers used in photoacoustic endoscopy cannot be bent and rotated along with the flexible shaft easily. To avoid this technical issue, in this study we implement a photoacoustic endoscopic probe that combines light delivery, acoustic sensing, and mechanical scanning in one small unit placed at the distal end of the endoscope.

Figure 1 shows (a) a schematic and (b) a photograph of the distal end of our photoacoustic endoscopic probe. In the probe, a light guiding optical fiber (0.22 NA, 365 μm core dia.), a single-element ultrasonic transducer (LiNbO3, 43 MHz, 2.0 mm aperture, unfocused), and a mechanical micromotor are placed into a stainless steel tube. Laser pulses from a DPSS Nd:YLF pumped dye laser (Cobra HRR, Sirah, 7 ns pulse duration) are guided by the optical fiber and emitted through a central hole (0.5 mm dia.) in the transducer. Circumferential sector scanning (B-scan) is accomplished by rotating a mirror (3.0 mm dia., protected aluminum on glass substrate, with the reflection surface at 45° to the probe's axis). The mirror—driven by a 1.5 mm diameter, 12.0 mm long geared micromotor (gear ratio, 254:1; Namiki Precision Inc.)—steers both the light beam from the optical fiber to the tissue and the acoustic wave from the tissue to the transducer. Because water and glass have a large ratio of sound propagation speeds (1.5/5.1, longitudinal wave; 1.5/3.3, shear wave), the scanning mirror exhibits total external reflection within the acceptance angles of the ultrasonic transducer and inserts no additional propagation losses into the ultrasonic detection. The scanning mirror system replaces the conventional flexible shaft-based mechanical scanning, enabling circumferential B-scanning without moving other illumination optics and the ultrasonic sensor.

Fig. 1
(a) Schematic of the photoacoustic endoscopic probe. GM, geared micromotor; JB, jewel bearings; MN, magnets; OF, optical fiber; PM, plastic membrane (imaging window); SM, scanning mirror; UST, ultrasonic transducer. (b) Photograph of the probe. (c) Field ...

The optical fiber, the transducer's signal wires, and the micromotor's wires are encapsulated in the flexible endoscope body. The implemented probe diameter, 4.2 mm, is currently limited by the transducer size, which can be further reduced. The mirror's rotational speed is kept constant at 2.6 Hz. To provide a matching medium for acoustic wave propagation, the transducer and scanning mirror's housing space is filled with deionized water and sealed with a 50 μm thick LDPE membrane. The micromotor is isolated from the water, and the torque required for the mirror rotation is transferred through a magnetic coupling mechanism.

As shown in Fig. 1(c), the field of view is a ring blocked partially by the stainless steel housing bridge. For each circular B-scan, 254 time-resolved photoacoustic signals (A-lines) are recorded, leading to an angular step size of 360°/254=1.42°. However, 76 A-lines, corresponding to the 110° stainless steel sector, are blocked. The maximum radial imaging depth, 3.0 mm, is determined by the 400 time points sampled at 200 MHz by a 12-bit data acquisition card, while the speed of sound is assumed to be 1.5 mm/s. The 570 nm laser beam diverges with a half angle of 9.6° from the optical fiber and illuminates tissue over a spot of 1.55 mm in diameter at a surface fluence of 17 mJ/cm2, which is within the ANSI safety limit of 20 mJ/cm2 [11]. The electric signal from the transducer is transmitted by a micro coaxial cable (50 Ω; 0.44 mm dia., Hitachi Cable Manchester) and amplified by 48 dB through two amplifiers (ZFL-500LN+, Mini-Circuits). To minimize noise, we apply a digital bandpass filter (23 - 63 MHz) to the signal. In all photoacoustic images, the pixel intensity corresponds to the signal amplitude calculated via Hilbert transformation of the time-domain signals.

To determine the performance of the system, we imaged a 6 μm diameter carbon fiber in clear (deionized water) and turbid media (0.25% Intralipid solution; μs' ≈ 3.5 cm-1); the results are shown in Fig. 2. Because the central acoustic wavelength of the transducer is much longer than the carbon fiber diameter, the carbon fiber can be treated as an ideal line target. In Fig. 2(a), we present a typical A-line signal acquired from the carbon fiber, along with the amplitude of its Hilbert transform (envelope). From the envelope, we determined the radial resolution based on the -6 dB width and also determined the SNR as a ratio of the peak signal magnitude to the noise fluctuation (standard deviation). Figure 2(b) shows the carbon fiber's transverse (angular or tangential) point spread function (PSF). The carbon fiber's photoacoustic B-scan images are plotted in Cartesian and polar coordinate formats in (c) and (d), respectively. In Figs. 2(e)-(g), the system's SNR, radial resolution, and transverse resolution are plotted versus the target's position measured from the plastic membrane surface, where 30 B-scan images were averaged. In Fig. 2(e), the clear medium's SNR equals 46 dB near the probe's surface but decreases to 35 dB at a depth of ~2.9 mm. The turbid medium's SNR is lower than that of the clear medium, decreasing from 35 dB to 18 dB within a 1.9-mm depth due to faster optical fluence decay. As seen in Fig. 2(f), the radial resolution in the clear medium slowly worsens with target distance, from 47 μm to 65 μm. The turbid medium's resolution ranges from 52 μm near the probe's surface to 89 μm at the 1.9-mm depth. In Fig. 2(g), the transverse resolution in the clear medium degrades gradually from 230 μm to 450 μm with increasing target distance, but that in the turbid medium does so from 177 μm to 520 μm.

Fig. 2
(a) Typical photoacoustic (PA) A-line of the carbon fiber: raw data and amplitude of the Hilbert-transform. (b) Transverse PSF for the carbon fiber. (c) Photoacoustic image of a carbon fiber (6 μm in diameter): Cartesian coordinate representation. ...

We demonstrate our system's imaging ability by imaging three tissue samples of a rat (Sprague Dawley rats; ~250 g; Harlan National Customer Service Center) [Fig. 3]. The animal was sacrificed first by an overdose of pentobarbital (120 mg/kg, IP), and the abdomen was depilated by a commercial hair removing lotion. All experimental animal procedures were carried out in compliance with the guidelines of the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The laboratory animal protocol for this work was approved by the Animal Study Committee of Washington University in St. Louis.

Fig. 3
(a) Photograph of the rat's abdominal surface. (b) Photoacoustic (PA) B-scan image of the tissue shown in (a). (c) Photograph of the rat's abdominal tissue segment (inner surface). The inset shows the whole sample from the outside. (d) PA image of the ...

First, we imaged the rat's abdominal surface in situ as shown in Fig. 3(a). The yellow arrow in the photograph indicates the scanning direction and range. The corresponding photoacoustic B-scan image is presented in Fig. 3(b). In the photoacoustic image, two blood vessels (BV1, BV2) are seen with strong signals at a depth of ~0.5 mm, and their positions match the blood vessel positions in the photograph well. In the photoacoustic image, another blood vessel (BV3) at a depth of ~2.5 mm is seen with a strong signal; however, it is invisible in the photograph, which demonstrates our endoscope's deep imaging capability in highly scattering skin tissue. Second, to demonstrate the blood vessel mapping capability, we imaged an excised abdominal tissue segment of the rat ex vivo through its inner surface, as shown in Fig. 3(c). The inset at the upper right corner shows the whole sample from outside. In the photoacoustic B-scan image presented in Fig. 3(d), three blood vessels appear at a depth of 1.0 mm, corresponding well with those in the photograph. Third, to show the endoscopic potential, we imaged an intact large intestinal tract of the rat ex vivo, as shown in Fig. 3(e). The endoscopic probe was inserted into the intestinal tract, where the green spot indicates the laser beam's position. In the photograph, we can see three blood vessels across the scanning line; all three are mapped well in the photoacoustic image as shown in Fig. 3(f). From the photoacoustic image, the intestinal wall's thickness is estimated to be ~1.0 mm.

In conclusion, we have presented the concept, implemented a system for photoacoustic endoscopy, and demonstrated the feasibility of our scanning-mirror-based system through ex vivo imaging experiments. The scanning mirror that deflects both light and sound makes the system simple, stable, and flexible. In our prototype photoacoustic endoscope, the angular scanning range was restricted by the stainless steel wall of the probe, which, however, can be replaced with an optically and acoustically transparent plastic material such as LDPE. Therefore, full-ring views are attainable. The lateral resolution of the system can be significantly improved by focusing either the ultrasonic transducer or the scanning mirror or both. Photoacoustic endoscopy is expected to be complementary to other forms of endoscopy because it is exquisitely sensitive to optical absorption and able to reach depths beyond the optical transport mean free path.


This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants R01 NS46214 (BRP), R01 EB000712, R01 EB008085, and U54 CA136398 (Network for Translational Research). L.W. has a financial interest in Endra, Inc., which, however, did not support this work. J.M.Y. was supported in part by a Korea Research Foundation Grant funded by the Korean Government (KRF-2007-357-C00039).


OCIS codes: 170.3880, 170.5120, 180.5810


1. Wang LV, editor. Photoacoustic Imaging and Spectroscopy. Taylor & Francis/CRC Press; 2009.
2. Oraevsky AA, Karabutov AA. Optoacoustic tomography. In: Vo-Dinh T, editor. Biomedical Photonics Handbook. Chap 34. vol. PM125. CRC Press; 2003.
3. Maslov K, Stoica G, Wang LV. In vivo dark-field reflection-mode photoacoustic microscopy. Opt. Lett. 2005;30:625–627. [PubMed]
4. Zhang HF, Maslov K, Stoica G, Wang LV. Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006;24:848–851. [PubMed]
5. Tearney GJ, Boppart SA, Bouma BE, Brezinski ME, Weissman NJ, Southern JF, Fujimoto JG. Scanning single-mode fiber optic catheter-endoscope for optical coherence tomography. Opt. Lett. 1996;21:543–545. [PubMed]
6. Yun SH, Tearney GJ, Vakoc BJ, Shishkov M, Oh WY, Desjardins A, Chan R, Suter M, Evans J, Jang IK, Nishioka NS, de Boer JF, Bouma BE. Comprehensive volumetric optical microscopy in vivo. Nat. Med. 2006;12:1429–1433. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Kiesslich R, Burg J, Vieth M, Gnaendiger J, Enders M, Delaney P, Polglase A, McLaren W, Janell D, Thomas S, Nafe B, Galle PR, Neurath MF. Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal cancer in vivo. Gastroenterol. 2004;127:706–713. [PubMed]
8. Viator JA, Paltauf G, Jacques SL, Prahl SA. Design and testing of an endoscopic photoacoustic probe for determination of treatment depth after photodynamic therapy. Proc. SPIE. 2001;4256:16–27.
9. Sethuraman S, Aglyamov SR, Amirian JH, Smalling RW, Emelianov SY. Intravascular photoacoustic imaging using an IVUS imaging catheter. IEEE Tran. Ultra. Ferro. Freq. Contr. 2007;54(5):978–986. [PubMed]
10. Menzel J, Domschke W. Gastrointestinal Miniprobe Sonography: The Current Status. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2000;95:605–616. [PubMed]
11. Laser Institute of America American National Standard for the Safe Use of LasersANSI. Z136. American National Standards Institute, Inc.; 2000. pp. 1–2000.