Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2009; 4(9): e7013.
Published online 2009 September 15. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0007013
PMCID: PMC2737618

Analysis of SNPs and Haplotypes in Vitamin D Pathway Genes and Renal Cancer Risk

Amanda Ewart Toland, Editor


In the kidney vitamin D is converted to its active form. Since vitamin D exerts its activity through binding to the nuclear vitamin D receptor (VDR), most genetic studies have primarily focused on variation within this gene. Therefore, analysis of genetic variation in VDR and other vitamin D pathway genes may provide insight into the role of vitamin D in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) etiology. RCC cases (N = 777) and controls (N = 1,035) were genotyped to investigate the relationship between RCC risk and variation in eight target genes. Minimum-p-value permutation (Min-P) tests were used to identify genes associated with risk. A three single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sliding window was used to identify chromosomal regions with a False Discovery Rate of <10%, where subsequently, haplotype relative risks were computed in Haplostats. Min-P values showed that VDR (p-value = 0.02) and retinoid-X-receptor-alpha (RXRA) (p-value = 0.10) were associated with RCC risk. Within VDR, three haplotypes across two chromosomal regions of interest were identified. The first region, located within intron 2, contained two haplotypes that increased RCC risk by approximately 25%. The second region included a haplotype (rs2239179, rs12717991) across intron 4 that increased risk among participants with the TC (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.09–1.57) haplotype compared to participants with the common haplotype, TT. Across RXRA, one haplotype located 3′ of the coding sequence (rs748964, rs3118523), increased RCC risk 35% among individuals with the variant haplotype compared to those with the most common haplotype. This study comprehensively evaluated genetic variation across eight vitamin D pathway genes in relation to RCC risk. We found increased risk associated with VDR and RXRA. Replication studies are warranted to confirm these findings.


Within the kidney, vitamin D is metabolized to 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol (1,25(OH)2D3), the active form of vitamin D [1]. The anti-carcinogenic properties of vitamin D include inhibition of clonal tumor cell proliferation, induction of immune cell differentiation and apoptosis, and decreased angiogenesis [2], [3]. Vitamin D activity is mediated through binding of 1,25(OH)2D3 to the vitamin D receptor (VDR), which can regulate transcription of other genes involved in cell regulation, growth, and immunity [3][6]. VDR modulates the expression of genes by forming a heterodimer complex with retinoid-X-receptors (RXR) [7]. This VDR-RXR complex is directed to the vitamin D response element (VDRE) in the promoter region of several 1,25(OH)2D3 regulated genes to initiate transcription [7], [8].

Since 1,25(OH)2D3 exerts its activity through nuclear VDR, most studies of genetic susceptibility to vitamin D related diseases have investigated variation within the VDR gene [4], [7], [9][11]. However, the concert of genes that interact with VDR is vast; therefore, an analysis of variation in VDR and other genes in the vitamin D pathway may provide insight into the role of vitamin D in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) etiology. Given the importance of vitamin D metabolism in the kidney and the lack of studies that have evaluated the relationship between vitamin D, the VDR gene, and RCC, we previously evaluated how three common VDR gene polymorphisms (BsmI, FokI, TaqI) modified RCC risk [12]. We observed reduced RCC risk among older subjects and among subjects with a family history of cancer who were carriers of the f alleles in the FokI single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) compared with subjects with the FF genotype [12]. However, given the limited genomic coverage of VDR in our previous candidate SNP investigation, and the numerous genes that interact directly with VDR in the vitamin D pathway, we expanded upon these findings to investigate variation in candidate genes that may interact directly with VDR to modify RCC risk and improved our analysis by increasing regional coverage of variation across each gene to 80–90%.

Therefore, to determine whether variation in vitamin D pathway genes modified RCC risk, we comprehensively investigated the relationship between renal cancer risk and 139 tagging SNPs across eight target genes (VDR, RXRA, RXRB, CYP24A1, GC, STAT1, THRAP4, and TRAP5) of the vitamin D pathway among cases and controls from Central Europe, an area with one of the highest rates of RCC worldwide [13]. To our knowledge, this represents one of the largest and most detailed investigations of genetic variation within the vitamin D pathway and RCC risk conducted to date.


A description of study participants and known RCC risk factors is provided in Table 1. All participants and only genotyped participants showed a similar distribution of characteristics, with the exception of sex. Cases and controls were comparable in age, but cases were more likely to have excess body mass index (BMI) (>30 kg/m2) and hypertension, and to have a first degree relative with cancer. The association with smoking was no longer observed after adjustment for age, BMI, hypertension, study center, and sex [14].

Table 1
General characteristics of participants in the CEERCC Study.

Table 2 lists results for global gene-based tests of association with case/control status using the minimum p-value permutation (Min-P) test. VDR (p-value = 0.02) and RXR-alpha (RXRA) (p-value = 0.10) genes were most strongly associated with RCC risk. Both the minimum p-value for all tagging SNPs within the gene and minimum false discover rate (FDR) adjusted p-values for the three SNP haplowalk sliding window for VDR and RXRA were significantly associated with RCC risk.

Table 2
Vitamin D pathway gene-based global, trend, and haplowalk minimum p-values for associations with renal cancer risk.

Subsequently, HaploWalk based methods were used to identify regions of interest in each gene that remained significant at an FDR of less than 10%. Three significant VDR haplotypes (Table 3) were identified in two regions that were associated with increased RCC risk. The first region (Figure 1), located within intron 2, showed subjects with the AGC (OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.10–1.52; p-value = 0.002) or GAC (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.04–1.51; p-value = 0.02) haplotype were at a significantly increased risk compared to patients with the most common referent haplotype, GAT. Increased risk appeared to be driven by the T to C change at the third loci. The second region (Figure 1), centered around intron 4, also increased RCC risk among participants with the TC (OR = 1.31; 95% CI = 1.09–1.57; p-value = 0.004) haplotype compared to participants with most common referent haplotype, TT. The R adjusted global p-values for both of these regions were 0.04 (Table 3). Across the RXRA gene (Figure 2), a single region located downstream, 3′ of the coding sequence, was shown to be associated with increased RCC risk among individuals with the CG (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.11–1.66; p-value = 0.003) haplotype compared to subjects with the most common haplotype, GA. The R adjusted global p-value for this region was 0.03.

Figure 1
VDR HaploWalk and Haploview analysis.
Figure 2
RXRA HaploWalk and Haploview analysis.
Table 3
Renal cancer risk and haplotypes in genes in the vitamin D pathway.

Results for individual analyses of these SNPs are provided in Supplemental Table S1. Thirteen SNPs in five vitamin D pathway genes were significantly associated with RCC risk using an additive model (number of significant tag SNPs): VDR(5), RXRA(5), CYP24A1(1), GC(1), and STAT1(1). No statistically significant interactions between these SNPs and potential confounders (i.e. BMI, age, sex, smoking status, hypertension, and a family history of cancer) were detected (data not shown). No difference in association between individual SNPs and RCC risk was observed when analyses were restricted to RCC cases histologically diagnosed with clear cell subtype (data not shown) nor when analyses were restricted to cases with only high grades tumors (data not shown).


In this analysis of 139 tagging SNPs across eight vitamin D pathway genes, we identified three regions within two genes that were significantly associated with RCC risk. Both genes, VDR and RXRA, for which we hypothesized a priori would be associated with risk, contained regions with significant associations. Across the VDR gene, three haplotypes within two regions (intron 2 and intron 4) were significantly associated with increased risk. Across the RXRA gene, RCC risk was higher among those with one particular haplotype located 3′ of the coding region.

Only a handful of studies have comprehensively analyzed genetic variation in the VDR gene in relation to cancer [15], [16], [17]. A case-control study of 630 incident prostate cancer patients was conducted to comprehensively analyze genetic variation in the VDR gene; twenty-two SNPs were genotyped to capture a high percentage of variation in the VDR gene [17]. A two-fold increase in prostate cancer risk was observed for two VDR loci (rs2107301 and rs2238135), which were located within introns 2 and 4, respectively [17]. Though information is limited regarding the association between VDR variants and RCC risk, genetic susceptibility studies for common VDR polymorphisms, such as BsmI, FokI, TaqI, and ApaI, have been shown to modify RCC risk [15], [16]. A recent case-control study of 135 RCC patients found that participants with the AA genotype at the ApaI site had a significant increase in RCC risk (OR = 2.59; p-value = 0.01); cases with the AA genotype also were found to have lower survival rates (Relative Risk = 3.3; p-value = 0.04) compared to cases with the Aa or aa genotypes [16]. A two-fold increase in cancer risk was also reported among participants with the TT genotype at the TaqI site in a second case-control study of 102 RCC patients compared to subjects with the Tt or tt genotype (p-value = 0.001) [15].

Similarly, few previous studies of RCC risk and variation across vitamin D pathway genes have been conducted. A small number of polymorphisms in the VDR gene, such as poly(A), TaqI, and BsmI, have been speculated to result in variation of VDR expression and are hypothesized to subsequently result in changes to circulating levels of active vitamin D [15], [18], [19]. Altered VDR protein expression has been reported in a number of tumor types including breast, malignant gliomas, prostate, and colon cancer [20]. Moreover, previous epidemiological studies have reported that increased binding of vitamin D to VDR is associated with decreased RCC risk, and that active levels of vitamin D3 in serum are significantly lower in RCC patients compared to population controls [15], [16], [19]. Together these results indicate that vitamin D levels influence RCC risk. While results have been mixed concerning associations between variants in the RXR gene and cancer risk [21][24], in vitro animal and human studies have shown that elevated levels of RXRA increases the antiproliferative effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 [25], [26].

In vitro and animal studies suggest that vitamin D and its metabolites may impede carcinogenesis by stimulating cell differentiation, inhibiting cell proliferation typically characterized by G0/G1 cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and suppression of invassion, angiogenesis, and metastasis [3][6]. In laboratory studies, 1,25 hydroxyvitamin D has been shown to significantly reduce tumor growth for a variety of cancers including colon, breast, prostate and lung [18]. The use of vitamin D or its analogs as chemopreventive agents in humans, although limited, have shown beneficial effects. In a clinical trial for patients with inoperable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma a daily dose of 10 mg of Seocalcitol (a vitamin D analog) for up to one year resulted in a reduction in tumor dimension [27]. Additionally, among 37 patients with metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer, who were treated with a high dose treatment of oral calcitriol/docetaxel (active form of vitamin D/mitotic inhibitor), prostate-specific antigen reductions of at least 50% was observed [28].

Although the magnitude of association between RCC risk and VDR and RXRA gene variants in our study may be small, some of these variants are relatively common in the population and therefore may be associated with a much higher attributable risk as a whole compared to rare high penetrance genes. Furthermore, the VDR variants associated with RCC risk in this study were intronic and were not located near intron-exon boundaries that may produce splicing errors. These alleles seem to have no effect on the expression levels or activity of translated VDR protein and it is hypothesized that they are correlated with other variants with functional relevance. Synonymous SNPs are often disregarded in many genetic susceptibility studies based on the assumption that they do not alter amino acid sequence, which would subsequently affect protein structure and function, nor protein expression [29]. Yet, the list of synonymous mutations associated with human diseases is growing [29], [30]. Recent genetic studies have shown that synonymous mutations are not random and may play a significant role in disease etiology since synonymous SNPs can affect protein expression and function by altering mRNA stability [29], [31], [32]. Studies solely focusing on genetic variations within exonic regions of DNA that lead to changes in protein sequence may be simplistic and may not represent the larger picture that is evolving between genetic variation and disease [33].

In addition to being one of the first genetic susceptibility studies to comprehensively examine the association between VDR and seven other vitamin D pathway genes in relation to RCC risk, an additional strength of our study includes the use of HapMap data to tag genes of interest using high (80–90%) genomic coverage by tagging genomic regions, both upstream (20 kb) and downstream (10 kb) to reduce chance of false negative findings. In this study, we also observed high participation rates, used newly diagnosed cases, included only histologically confirmed cancers, and collected biologic materials from a high proportion of subjects. The large sample size of this study provided sufficient statistical power to detect relatively small associations between genotypes and risk. Analysis of genes with significant global p-values reduced the risk of Type I errors in our study, while the use of two different Haplotype-based methods (HaploWalk and HaploStats) reduced the possibility of finding significant results based on chance. Furthermore, while hospital-based case-control studies have potential limitations due to the lack of population controls, these studies can improve response rates for the intense collection of biological specimens and therefore reduce the chances of bias in the assessment of gene-environment interactions [34]. Lastly, we did not employ a direct marker for vitamin D among these study subjects. While there is general agreement that serum 25(OH)D level is the best indicator of current vitamin D status, the biochemical marker has a short half-life and would not necessarily reflect long-term vitamin D status, particularly for case-control studies where cases have just recently been diagnosed [35].

In conclusion, our a priori hypothesis was supported and we observed that genetic variations in VDR and RXRA were significantly associated with RCC risk. However, since our results are observed within introns rather than exons and because we are only beginning to understand the role of genetic variation in intronic regions and their effect on disease development, additional studies of genetic variations of these two genes and RCC risk are warranted.

Materials and Methods

Study Subjects

Details of the Central and Eastern European Renal Cell Carcinoma (CEERCC) study have been previously reported [36]. Briefly, the CEERCC study is a hospital-based case-control study of renal cell cancer conducted between 1999 and 2003 in seven centers in four Central and Eastern European countries (Moscow, Russia; Bucharest, Romania; Lodz, Poland; and Prague, Olomouc, Ceske-Budejovice, and Brno, Czech Republic). Each center followed an identical protocol and was responsible for recruiting a consecutive group of newly diagnosed cases of kidney cancer as well as a comparable group of hospital controls. Controls in all centers were chosen among subjects admitted as in- or out-patients in the same hospital as the cases, with conditions unrelated to tobacco or genitourinary disorders. No single disease made up more than 20% of the control group. All subjects were residents of the study areas for at least one year at the time of recruitment and were of Caucasian descent.

Cases between 20 and 79 years of age were ascertained through a rapid reporting system. Participating physician and other professional staff members visiting the urology, surgery, radiology, or pathology departments of participating hospitals regularly identified patients admitted for kidney cancer work-up. All patients suspected of having kidney cancer were approached for interview, but only histologically confirmed cases were included in the final analysis. All tumors were centrally reviewed to confirm diagnosis and histology. The majority of renal tumors were clear cell carcinomas (83.4%), while other subtypes included papillary (7%), chromophobe (2.4%), oncocytoma (2.3%), oncocytic neoplasms (0.2%), transitional cell carcinomas (1.1%), and unclassified (3.6%). Controls were frequency-matched to cases on age (±3 years), sex, and study center. A total of 1,097 confirmed incident RCC cases and 1,476 controls were included in this study. Genomic DNA was obtained from 987 of 1,097 (90%) of cases and 1,298 of 1,476 (88%) of controls. The response rates across study centers among eligible subjects who were requested to participate ranged from 90.0–98.6% for cases and 90.3–96.1% for controls.


Cases and controls were interviewed with the same questionnaire [37]. Information on demographic characteristics, medical histories, and lifestyle factors was obtained through in-person interviews by trained personnel using standardized lifestyle and food frequency questionnaires. Cases were interviewed within three months of diagnosis. Written consent for participation was obtained from all study subjects, and ethical approval was obtained for all study centers.

Laboratory Procedures

Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood buffy coat using a standard phenol chloroform method. Genotyping was conducted with a GoldenGate® Oligo Pool All (OPA) assay by Illumina® ( at the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Core Genotyping Facility (CGF) where lab staff was blinded to cases/control status. Suitable quantity and quality of genomic DNA was obtained from a subset of 777 (70.8%) RCC cases and 1,035 (70.1%) controls, due to strict quality and quantity criteria for analysis using the Illumina® OPA panel.

A literature review of vitamin D associated genes helped identify eight candidate genes (VDR, RXRA, RXRB, CYP24A1, GC, STAT1, THRAP4 and THRAP5) that were ultimately selected for their involvement in vitamin D metabolism, transport, binding, function and/or expression, which may affect the mechanisms through which vitamin D may influence cancer risk. Since it is well known that VDR elicits a transcriptional response by forming a heterodimer complex with the retinoid-X-receptor, in this study both VDR and RXR were the primary genes suspected a priori to modify renal cancer risk. The group specific component (GC) vitamin D binding protein was selected for its involvement as the major carrier of vitamin D in plasma [38]. Cytochrome P450, family 24, subfamily A, polypeptide 1 (CYP24A1) was selected for its involvement in degrading and regulating 1,25(OH)2D3 levels [39], [40]. Lastly, the signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) and the thyroid hormone receptor associated protein 4 and 5 (THRAP4 and THRAP5) genes were selected since studies indicate that these genes may induce or suppress transcription by interacting with the VDR-RXR complex [41], [42].

Tag SNPs were selected to provide 80–90% genomic coverage across the genomic regions of interest. To ensure thorough coverage of the targeted region, additional coverage of regions both upstream (20 kb) of the start of transcription and downstream (10 kb) of the last exon using HapMap CEU data ( among SNPs with minor allele frequencies of at least 5% and an r2≥80% were selected. Additionally, non-synonymous SNPs or those correlated with polymorphisms with potential functional significance were included in analysis. In total, 139 SNPs in eight vitamin D-related pathway target genes were selected for analysis. The total length of sequence analyzed across all genes was 495,664 bases (VDR: 37,421 bases, RXRA: 144,022 bases, RXRB: 36,257 bases, CYP24A1: 50,537 bases, GC: 72,479 bases, STAT1: 75,061 bases, THRAP4: 39,862 bases, and THRAP5: 40,025 bases). Replicate quality control samples (5% samples) were interspersed among genotyping plates. The genotyping failure rate for the selected SNPs was 4.8% (7/146). The concordance rate between duplicate DNA samples ranged from 93–100% and completion rates ranged from 98–100%. The genotype frequencies among controls did not differ from the expected Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium proportions (p>0.05). All SNPs and assay information are reported in NCI's SNP500Cancer Database ( [43].

Statistical Analysis

The distributions of selected characteristics and known RCC risk factors (sex, age, smoking habits, hypertension, BMI, family history of cancer, and country of residence) were compared between genotyped cases and controls using the Chi-square test. These characteristics were further evaluated to determine if associations between SNPs and RCC were modified; however, no significant interactions were observed between cancer risk, RCC risk factors, and SNPs (data not shown).

The associations between individual SNPs and RCC risk were estimated by calculating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using unconditional logistic regression. Interactions were tested comparing regression models with and without interaction terms using a likelihood ratio test (LRT). All regression models were adjusted for age (continuous), sex, study center, and smoking habit (ever, never). Additional risk factors (i.e. hypertension, BMI, and family history of cancer) were also considered, however, these variables did not affect risk estimates by at least 10%. To avoid redundant analyses, only one SNP was evaluated when high correlations were observed between two SNPs (r2>0.85). Of the 139 SNPs genotyped, two pairs of SNPs in the VDR gene were found to be highly correlated (r2 = 0.95 for rs1544410 (BsmI) and rs731236 (TaqI); r2 = 0.89 for rs2248098 and rs2239185) and therefore only one SNP was used per pair (rs1544410 (BsmI) and rs2248098).

Since the most common form of renal cell carcinoma is of clear cell type, associations between individual SNPs and RCC risk were also evaluated among cases histologically diagnosed with this subtype of renal cancer. However restricting cases to those with clear cell type did not affect risk estimates by at least 10% (data not shown). Similarly, analyses restricted to cases with only high grades tumors did not affect risk estimates (data not shown).

Risk estimates were calculated for the heterozygous and homozygous variant genotypes relative to the common homozygous genotype assuming an additive model. When the frequency of the homozygous variant allele was less than 5% among controls, a dominant model was used to determine risk estimates for the presence and absence of the variant allele. Associations between SNP variants and RCC were assessed using an additive model (i.e. linear test of trend for the number of copies of the variant allele (0, 1, 2)) or a dominant model (i.e. Wald chi-square test for the presence or absence of the variant allele (0, 1)). To assess global significance of association with genes, a minimum p-value permutation (Min-P) test was used for analysis because it corrects for multiple testing while also accounting for correlations between SNPs within a gene [44]. Genes that had a significant Min-P test at a cut-off level of 10% were selected for further analysis. Analysis for genes that did not meet this criterion is available in Supplemental Figure S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6.

HaploWalk, a haplotype-based sliding window analytic method, was used to evaluate candidate genes with N = K SNPs. The HaploWalk procedure considered a three SNP window for each SNP from SNP 2 through SNP K-1. For each window, haplotype frequencies in cases and controls were reconstructed using the EM algorithm [45], and a Wald test was used to screen for association with case-control status [44]. In the initial screening phase, no adjustment was made for potential confounders. The Wald test used a threshold value of 5%, such that haplotypes in cases and controls that had an estimated frequency below the threshold in controls were pooled into an ‘other’ rare haplotype category for testing. To account for multiple testing across the K SNPs, the K-2 p-values (one for each window) were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the False Discovery Rate (FDR)-controlling procedure of Benjamini and Hochberg [46]. Haplotype windows with an FDR-adjusted value of <10% were promoted to the second stage.

In stage two, haplotype blocks identified with HaploWalk were analyzed in relation to RCC risk using Haplostats (R version 2.4.0; [47], adjusted for age, sex, study center, and smoking habit. Additionally, we used standard methods to identify haplotypes using the Haploview program version 3.32 [48]. Linkage disequilibrium between markers was assessed by calculating pairwise Lewontin's D' and r2 using Haploview among population controls [48]. Heterogeneity of genotype frequencies among countries was evaluated by using the likelihood ratio test to compare the fit of models with and without interaction terms, but we did not find evidence of heterogeneity across populations. No evidence of population stratification was apparent from a principal components analysis of a genome wide association study conducted in this population [49], and the likelihood of this is small among European populations [50]. Associations between common haplotypes (>5% frequency) and RCC risk were evaluated by computing ORs and 95% CIs using the most common haplotype category for comparison. All analyses were conducted in STATA 9.0 unless otherwise specified (STATA Corporation, College Station, TX).

Supporting Information

Table S1

SNP-based analysis main effects for vitamin D pathway genes

(1.73 MB DOC)

Figure S1

RXRB HaploWalk and Haploview analysis. Top: HaploWalk analysis identified no chromosomal regions of interest in the retinoid-X-receptor-beta (RXRB) gene that were significant at an FDR of 10%. The Min-P test for this gene was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.20). Bottom: Haploview analysis identified two haplotype blocks; none were associated with RCC risk when analyzed in Haplostats.

(0.24 MB TIF)

Figure S2

CYP24A1 HaploWalk and Haploview analysis. Top: HaploWalk analysis identified no chromosomal regions of interest in the cytochrome P450, family 24, subfamily A, polypeptide 1 (CYP24A1) gene that were significant at an FDR of 10%. The Min-P test for this gene was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.63). Bottom: Haploview analysis identified several haplotype blocks; none were associated with RCC risk when analyzed in Haplostats.

(0.76 MB TIF)

Figure S3

GC HaploWalk and Haploview analysis. Top: HaploWalk analysis identified no chromosomal regions of interest in the group specific component (GC) vitamin D binding protein that were significant at an FDR of 10%. The Min-P test for this gene was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.25). Bottom: Haploview analysis identified one haplotype block which was not associated with RCC risk when analyzed in Haplostats.

(2.86 MB TIF)

Figure S4

STAT1 HaploWalk and Haploview analysis. Top: HaploWalk analysis identified a single chromosomal region of interest in the signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) gene that was significant at an FDR of 10%. This region included SNPs 3′- rs3755821, rs6751855, rs1467199, rs13029532 -5′. The Min-P test for this gene was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.14). Bottom: Haploview analysis also identified one haplotype block within the same chromosomal region of interest. Haplostats analysis adjusted for age, sex, study center, and smoking habit showed that subjects with the CGGA haplotype had an increased risk of RCC (OR = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.01–1.45; p-value = 0.04) compared to subjects with the referent haplotype, GACA.

(1.76 MB TIF)

Figure S5

THRAP4 HaploWalk and Haploview analysis. Top: HaploWalk analysis identified no chromosomal regions of interest in the thyroid hormone receptor associated protein 4 (THRAP4) gene that were significant at an FDR of 10%. The Min-P test for this gene was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.94). Bottom: Haploview analysis identified one haplotype block which was not associated with RCC risk when analyzed in Haplostats.

(1.42 MB TIF)

Figure S6

THRAP5 HaploWalk and Haploview analysis. Top: HaploWalk analysis identified no chromosomal regions of interest in the thyroid hormone receptor associated protein 5 (THRAP5) gene that were significant at an FDR of 10%. The Min-P test for this gene was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.38). Bottom: Haploview analysis identified several haplotype blocks; none were associated with RCC risk when analyzed in Haplostats.

(0.64 MB TIF)


Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the US National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


1. Norman AW. Sunlight, season, skin pigmentation, vitamin D, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D: integral components of the vitamin D endocrine system. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;67:1108–1110. [PubMed]
2. Trump DL, Hershberger PA, Bernardi RJ, Ahmed S, Muindi J, et al. Anti-tumor activity of calcitriol: pre-clinical and clinical studies. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;89:519–526. [PubMed]
3. Ordonez-Moran P, Larriba MJ, Pendas-Franco N, Aguilera O, Gonzalez-Sancho JM, et al. Vitamin D and cancer: an update of in vitro and in vivo data. Front Biosci. 2005;10:2723–2749. [PubMed]
4. Valdivielso JM, Fernandez E. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and diseases. Clin Chim Acta. 2006;371:1–12. [PubMed]
5. Walters MR. Newly identified actions of the vitamin D endocrine system. Endocr Rev. 1992;13:719–764. [PubMed]
6. Slattery ML. Vitamin D receptor gene (VDR) associations with cancer. Nutr Rev. 2007;65:S102–S104. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Lin R, White JH. The pleiotropic actions of vitamin D. Bioessays. 2003;26:21–28. [PubMed]
8. Holick MF. Vitamin D: Its role in cancer prevention and treatment. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2006;92:49–59. [PubMed]
9. Maalej A, Petit-Teixeira E, Michou L, Rebai A, Cornelis F, et al. Association study of VDR gene with rheumatoid arthritis in the French population. Genes Immun. 2005;6:707–711. [PubMed]
10. Fukazawa T, Yabe I, Kikuchi S, Sasaki H, Hamada T, et al. Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism with multiple sclerosis in Japanese. J Neurol Sci. 1999;166:47–52. [PubMed]
11. Handoko HY, Nancarrow DJ, Mowry BJ, McGrath JJ. Polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor and their associations with risk of schizophrenia and selected anthropometric measures. Am J Hum Biol. 2006;18:415–417. [PubMed]
12. Karami S, Brennan P, Hung RJ, Boffetta P, Toro J, et al. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and renal cancer risk in Central and Eastern Europe. J Toxicol Environ Health. 2008;71:367–372. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBACAN. Available at: Last Accessed on June 12, 2008.
14. Hunt JD, van der Hel OL, McMillan GP, Boffetta P, Brennan P. Renal cell carcinoma in relation to cigarette smoking: meta-analysis of 24 studies. Int J Cancer. 2005;114:101–108. [PubMed]
15. Ikuyama T, Hamasaki T, Inatomi H, Katoh T, Muratani T, et al. Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism with renal cell carcinoma in Japanese. Endocr J. 2002;49:433–438. [PubMed]
16. Obara W, Suzuki Y, Kato K, Tanji S, Konda R, et al. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms are associated with increased risk and progression of renal cell carcinoma in a Japanese population. Int J Urol. 2007;14:483–487. [PubMed]
17. Holick CN, Stanford JL, Kwon EM, Ostrander EA, Nejentsev S, et al. Comprehensive association analysis of the vitamin D pathway genes, VDR, CYP27B1, and CYP24A1, in prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:1990–1999. [PubMed]
18. Ma J, Stampfer MJ, Gann PH, Hough HL, Giovannucci E, et al. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms, circulating vitamin D metabolites, and risk of prostate cancer in United States physicians. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998;7:385–390. [PubMed]
19. Fujiok T, Suzuki Y, Okamoto T. Prevention of renal cell carcinoma by active vitamin D3. World J Surg. 2000;24:1015–1020. [PubMed]
20. Madej A, Puzianowska-Kuznicka M, Tanski Z, Nauman J, Nauman A. Vitamin D receptor binding to DNA is altered without the change in its expression in human renal clear cell cancer. Nephron Exp Nephrol. 2003;93:150–157. [PubMed]
21. Martinet N, Alla F, Farré G, Labib T, Drouut H, et al. Retinoic acid receptor and retinoid X receptor alterations in lung cancer precursor lesions. Cancer Res. 2000;60:2869–2875. [PubMed]
22. Lawrence JA, Merino MJ, Simpson JF, Manrow RE, Page DL, et al. A high-risk lesion for invasive breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ, exhibits frequent over expression of retinoid X receptor. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998;7:29–35. [PubMed]
23. Buentig N, Stoerkel S, Richter E, Dallmann I, Reitz M, et al. Predictive impact of retinoid X receptor-alpha-expression in renal-cell carcinoma. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2004;19:331–342. [PubMed]
24. Kong G, Kim HT, Wu K, DeNardo D, Hilsenbeck SG, et al. The retinoid X receptor-selective retinoid, LGD1069, down-regulates cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human breast cells through transcription factor crosstalk: implications for molecular-based chemoprevention. Cancer Res. 2005;65:3462–3469. [PubMed]
25. Tokar EJ, Webber MM. Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) inhibits growth and invasion by up-regulating nuclear receptors and 25-hydroxylase (CYP27A1) in human prostate cancer cells. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2005;22:275–284. [PubMed]
26. Prüfer K, Schröder C, Hegyi K, Barsony J. Degradation of RXRs influences sensitivity of rat osteosarcoma cells to the antiproliferative effects of calcitriol. Mol Endocrinol. 2002;16:961–976. [PubMed]
27. Dalhoff K, Dancey J, Astrup L, Skovsgaard T, Hamberg KJ, et al. A phase II study of the vitamin D analogue Seocalcitol in patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:252–257. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Beer TM, Eilers KM, Garzotto M, Egorin MJ, Lowe BA, et al. Weekly high-dose calcitriol and docetaxel in metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:123–128. [PubMed]
29. Sauna ZE, Kimchi-Sarfaty C, Ambudkar SV, Gottesman MM. Silent Polymorphisms Speak: How They Affect Pharmacogenomics and the Treatment of Cancer. Cancer Res. 2007;67:9609–9612. [PubMed]
30. Laws SM, Hone E, Gandy S, Martins RN. Expanding the association between the APOE gene and the risk of Alzheimer's disease: possible roles for APOE promoter polymorphisms and alterations in APOE transcription. J Neurochem. 2003;84:1215–1236. [PubMed]
31. Nackley AG, Shabalina SA, Tchivileva IE, Satterfield K, Korchynskyi O, et al. Human catechol-O-methyltransferase haplotypes modulate protein expression by altering mRNA secondary structure. Science. 2006;314:1930–1933. [PubMed]
32. Capon F, Allen MH, Ameen M, Burden AD, Tillman D, et al. A synonymous SNP of the corneodesmosin gene leads to increased mRNA stability and demonstrates association with psoriasis across diverse ethnic groups. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:2361–2368. [PubMed]
33. Nejentsev S, Godfrey L, Snook H, Rance H, Nutland S, et al. Comparative high-resolution analysis of linkage disequilibrium and tag single nucleotide polymorphisms between populations in the vitamin D receptor gene. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:1633–1639. [PubMed]
34. Wacholder S, Chatterjee N, Hartge P. Joint effect of genes and environment distorted by selection biases: implications for hospital-based case-control studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:885–889. [PubMed]
35. Core Genotyping Facility. Access at: Last accessed on March 14, 2008
36. Brennan P, McKay J, Moore L, Zaridze D, Mukeria A, et al. Uncommon CHEK2 mis-sense variant and reduced risk of tobacco-related cancers: case control study. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16:1794–1801. [PubMed]
37. Hsu CC, Chow WH, Boffetta P, Moore L, Zaridze D, et al. Dietary risk factors of renal cell carcinoma in eastern and central Europe. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:62–70. [PubMed]
38. Verboven C, Rabijns A, De Maeyer M, Van Baelen H, Bouillon R, et al. A structural basis for the unique binding features of the human vitamin D-binding protein. Nat Struct Biol. 2002;9:131–136. [PubMed]
39. Sawada N, Kusudo T, Sakaki T, Hatakeyama S, Hanada M, et al. Novel metabolism of 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 with C24-C25 bond cleavage catalyzed by human CYP24A1. Biochemistry. 2004;43:4530–4537. [PubMed]
40. Väisänen S, Dunlop TW, Sinkkonen L, Frank C, Carlberg C. Spatio-temporal activation of chromatin on the human CYP24 gene promoter in the presence of 1alpha,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3. J Mol Biol. 2005;350:65–77. [PubMed]
41. Puzianowska-Kuznicka M, Nauman A, Madej A, Tanski Z, Cheng S, et al. Expression of thyroid hormone receptors is disturbed in human renal clear cell carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2000;155:145–152. [PubMed]
42. Vidal M, Ramana CV, Dusso AS. Stat1-vitamin D receptor interactions antagonize 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D transcriptional activity and enhance stat1-mediated transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:2777–2787. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Packer BR, Yeager M, Burdett L, Welch R, Beerman M, et al. SNP500Cancer: a public resource for sequence validation, assay development, and frequency analysis for genetic variation in candidate genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Database issue):D617–D621. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Chen BE, Sakoda LC, Hsing AW, Rosenberg PS. Resampling-Based Hypothesis Testing Procedures for Genetic Case-Control Association Studies. Gentic Epidemiology. 2006;30:495–507. [PubMed]
45. Excoffier L, Slatkin M. Maximum-likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population. MolBiolEvol. 1995;12:921–927. [PubMed]
46. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical SocietySeries B (methodological) 1995;57:289–300.
47. R Project for Statistical Computing. Available at: Accessed on March 14, 2008
48. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:263–265. [PubMed]
49. Hung RJ, Christiani DC, Risch A, Popanda O, Haugen A, et al. International Lung Cancer Consortium: pooled analysis of sequence variants in DNA repair and cell cycle pathways. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:3081–3089. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Wacholder S, Rothman N, Caporaso N. Counterpoint: bias from population stratification is not a major threat to the validity of conclusions from epidemiological studies of common polymorphisms and cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:513–520. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science