PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Biomaterials. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 September 3.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2737252
NIHMSID: NIHMS44157

Non-invasive characterization of structure and morphology of silk fibroin biomaterials using non-linear microscopy

Abstract

Designing biomaterial scaffolds remains a major challenge in tissue engineering. Key to this challenge is improved understanding of the relationships between the scaffold properties and its degradation kinetics, as well as the cell interactions and the promotion of new matrix deposition. Here we present the use of non-linear spectroscopic imaging as a non-invasive method to characterize not only morphological, but also structural aspects of silkworm silk fibroin-based biomaterials, relying entirely on endogenous optical contrast. We demonstrate that two photon excited fluorescence and second harmonic generation are sensitive to the hydration, overall β sheet content and molecular orientation of the sample. Thus, the functional content and high resolution afforded by these non-invasive approaches offer promise for identifying important connections between biomaterial design and functional engineered tissue development. The strategies described also have broader implications for understanding and tracking the remodeling of degradable biomaterials under dynamic conditions both in vitro and in vivo.

Keywords: Silk, Fibroin, Non-linear Microscopy, Two-photon excited fluorescence, Second Harmonic Generation, Spectral Analysis, Non-invasive characterization

1. Introduction

Design optimization of the biomaterials that are used as scaffolds onto which new or regenerated tissues are expected to grow is one of the major challenges facing tissue engineers. Numerous aspects of the biomaterials design, from the molecular structure and organization to the overall macro-architecture of these systems are known to impact significantly the development of new tissue in vitro and in vivo[14]. Scaffolds provide structural support and important environmental cues to cells that populate them, thus controlling to a large extent cellular proliferation[1,5], differentiation[68], deposition of new structural proteins[9,10] and ultimately the regeneration of functional tissue[4,11,12]. Traditionally, methods such as NMR, FTIR and X-Ray spectroscopy have been used to assess biomaterials at the molecular level [1317], while SEM and TEM have been invaluable tools for characterizing the three dimensional morphology of biomaterial scaffolds [5,1823]. Histology and immunostaining as well as assays for determining the expression levels of specific proteins are often used to assess how scaffolds interact with cells as tissues develop[5,10,18,20,2224]. While all of these approaches provide sensitive and specific data, they are invasive. As a result, they reveal information about a single time-point along the development of a dynamically changing specimen. This limitation hinders full characterization and understanding of the relationships that exist between the structural, mechanical, architectural and biochemical properties of the scaffold and the corresponding properties of the developing tissue.

A number of optical methods have been developed to monitor non-invasively different tissue components in the context of disease diagnosis and monitoring[2529]. Such methods have only recently started to be exploited as tools for assessing different properties of the cell and matrix components of engineered tissues[3033]. The goal of this study was to determine the type of morphological and structural information that could be acquired about silk-based biomaterial scaffolds using spectral two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF) and second harmonic generation (SHG) imaging. This information will be essential in developing an optical biomarker toolkit that will allow us to monitor dynamically how such scaffolds interact with and are modified by cells as engineered tissues grow either in vitro or in vivo. Furthermore, these optical toolkits can also be extended to other biomaterial matrices as the systems are developed and optimized.

Silk is a natural protein polymer valued for its biocompatibility, light weight, and strength [34] Processing methods for this polymer are well established for control of morphology, mechanical properties and environmental stability [3538]. Due to these properties, silk is an excellent candidate for generating biomaterial scaffolds for engineered tissues. The Bombyx mori silkworm silk protein, fibroin, can be described by two structural models: Silk I, consisting of type II β turn, random coil domains, and mixed structures including alpha helices, and Silk II, consisting mostly of antiparallel β pleated sheets. [14,15]. The β sheet content and the alignment of these β sheet crystals, along with the non-crystalline domains of the protein, are important determinants of the bulk mechanical properties and degradation kinetics of biomaterials generated from silk[14,36,37,3941]. Most of theβ sheet content and orientation of these crystalline domains is lost during the processing of silk fibroin into aqueous solutions, a step required for the regeneration of new biomaterial scaffolds for tissue culture[42]. The β sheet content and orientation can be reconstituted to different extents depending on the mode of material preparation[14,38,42]. Thus, the non-invasive, optical assessment of β sheet content and orientation of silk fibroin during biomaterial scaffold formation was one of the specific goals of this study.

Linear optical approaches, such as fluorescence and Raman spectroscopy have been used previously to characterize materials made from silk fibroin[39,43,44]. However, there are no studies to our knowledge on the nonlinear optical properties of silk. Nonlinear optical methods such as TPEF and SHG offer additional advantages for non-invasive imaging including excitation in the near infrared region of the spectrum, where scattering is typically lower than in the visible region, and reduced photobleaching[45]. In TPEF and SHG two photons, typically of the same energy, interact simultaneously with a molecule and yield either fluorescence emission (TPEF) or scattering (SHG) of a single photon. In the case of SHG, the scattered photon has the same energy as the collective energy of the two incident photons (i.e. there is no net energy loss and the wavelength of the scattered photon is at exactly half the wavelength of each one of the incident photons). In the case of TPEF, the wavelength of the incident photons is approximately twice as long as the wavelength of a photon required for linear excitation, while the fluorescently emitted photons have nearly identical spectral features as those resulting from single photon excitation. Because the probability of simultaneous interaction with two photons is orders of magnitude lower than single photon interactions, TPEF and SHG processes require the presence of high photon densities. As a result, these events are confined within a small volume in the apex of a focused cone of light and automatically yield optically sectioned, depth-resolved images. The confinement of the optical effect, and the use of low energy (longer wavelength) photons results in reduced thermal and photo damage within and outside the plane of focus [45]. Exploiting such processes in microscopic imaging platforms allows frequent sample assessment over long periods of time, without damage or contamination from elements outside the tissue culture environment.

2. Materials and Methods

All chemicals were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise noted.

2.1. Preparation of silk fibroin

Cocoons of B. mori were kindly provided by M. Tsukada (Institute of Sericulture, Tsukuba, Japan). The cocoons were initially processed to remove the glue-like sericin proteins and to extract the pure silk fibroin component as previously described [39]. The resulting aqueous silk fibroin solution had an approximate concentration of 8% (wt) silk fibroin. For hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFIP) silk fibroin solutions, aqueous silk was lyophilized and redissolved in HFIP resulting in a 6% (w/v) fibroin solution.

2.2. Preparation of films and gels

Silk fibroin films were made by pipetting volumes of aqueous or HFIP silk solutions onto 35mm glass bottom dishes (MatTek, Acton MA) and allowing the solvent to evaporate. Gels were made from aqueous solutions in 35mm glass bottom dishes at silk concentrations of 8% and 4% with 6% (vol) 0.1M HCl. The silk solutions were placed on the dishes first and the acid was titrated into the solution for a final volume of 2.5 mL.

Dishes were then sealed with paraffin film and placed at 37°C for 72 hours [42]. β sheet content was induced in silk fibroin films by immersion in methanol for 30 minutes. Films were compressed and stretched by placing films in opposing clamps, applying pressure to secure the film and then drawing the clamps apart.

2.3. Preparation of scaffolds

Three dimensional silk scaffolds were prepared as previously described [39]. The scaffolds were cut into discs (5 mm in diameter and 3 mm in thickness) dried at 60° C, and autoclaved for further experiments. The pore size of the scaffolds was 550±30 μm.

Human mesenchymal stem cells (Cambrex, East Rutherford NJ) were seeded onto an aqueous silk scaffold as described by Kim et al[19]. The seeded scaffolds were placed on glass bottom dishes and imaged on day 21.

2.4. Two-photon Excited Fluorescence and Second Harmonic Generation Microscopy

TPEF and SHG micrographs were acquired on a Leica DMIRE2 microscope with a TCS SP2 scanner (Wetzlar, Germany). The system was equipped with a 10× (NA 0.3) dry, 20× (NA 0.7) dry and a 63× (NA 1.2) water immersion objective. The excitation light source was a Mai Tai tunable (710–920nm) titanium sapphire laser emitting 100 fs pulses at 80MHz (Spectra Physics, Mountain View CA). Samples were placed on culture dishes with number 1.5 cover glass bottoms (MATTEK, Ashland MA) and excited at 800 nm. Fluorescence emission spectra were detected from 380 nm to 700 nm in 30 steps with a 20 nm detector bandwidth. Fluorescence images were acquired simultaneously by two non-descanned PMTs with a filter cube containing a 700 nm short pass filter (Chroma SPC700bp) a dichroic mirror (Chroma 495dcxr), and emitter bandpass filters centered at 455 nm (Chroma 455bp70) and 525 nm (Chroma 525bp50). SHG images were acquired in the forward direction through a bandpass filter centered at 400 nm (Chroma hq400/20m-2p). Analysis was performed with the Leica Confocal Software (Wetzlar, Germany) and Matlab (Mathworks, Natick MA).

2.5. FTIR Analysis

FTIR spectroscopy was performed on a Bruker Equinox 55 FTIR spectrometer (Billerica, MA, USA). Measurements were made over 64 scans with a resolution of 4 cm−1 over the range of 400 – 4000 cm−1. Data were collected with the Opus 4 software.

2.6. Polarized Raman Spectroscopy

Raman polarized spectra were recorded at room temperature and in the backscattering configuration using a Hololab 5000R Raman spectrometer (Kaiser Optical Systems, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI) coupled to a microscope. The samples were studied using the 785 nm line of a near infra red solid state laser (Kaiser, Invictus 785), which was focused using a 50X objective (0.75 NA) and provided an excitation power at the sample of approximately 5 mW. Spectra were collected using a holographic grating and a CCD detector. The fluorescence background was removed using a polynomial function.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Assessment of β sheet content in silk fibroin biomaterials through TPEF emission spectra

To assess the detailed TPEF features of silk, we acquired spectral images in the 380 to 700 nm range from silk fibroin generated at different processing stages and in different biomaterial formats. Specifically, we examined silk in aqueous solution, dried aqueous and hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP)-processed films, films with β sheet content induced by methanol treatment, hydrogels induced by pH changes, aqueous and HFIP-processed scaffolds, and natural silk fibers. We demonstrate in Figure 1 that TPEF spectra excited at 800 nm are sensitive to the secondary structure of the silk fibroin protein, and more specifically its β sheet content and hydration status. The dependence of the silk TPEF spectral emission on β sheet content is demonstrated in panel A, through repeated measurements of an aqueous 8% silk solution, whose secondary structure is changing dynamically over a period of 22 hours as it transforms into a hydrogel, in response to the addition of 6% by volume 0.1N HCl. In particular, a progressive blue shift occurs in the emission spectra of the fibroin, as the β sheet content increases during the formation of the hydrogel[42]. The ability to monitor and characterize such changes in the same sample in a manner that doesn’t interfere at all with the specimen is one of the main advantages of TPEF spectral imaging approaches. A schematic representation of the structural changes that are probably occurring in the hydrogel that lead to the observed spectral shifts is included in Fig. 1B. Note that these schematics do not attempt to provide an accurate representation of silk structure. The increase in β sheet content was confirmed by the presence of a dominant FTIR peak at 1625 cm−1(Fig. 1E) [14]. This peak is absent from the FTIR spectrum of a dried aqueous solution (aqueous film, Fig. 1E), which exhibits a strong peak at 1650 cm−1, characteristic of random coil and α helical protein structures present in the silk I conformation. We have also observed an enhancement in the blue region of the spectrum of silk fibroin films upon methanol treatment, as shown in the inset of Fig. 1A for an HFIP-treated film. Similar TPEF spectra have been acquired from aqueous films. The induction of β sheet formation upon methanol treatment was confirmed by FTIR studies (Fig. 1E). A blue shift is also present when comparing the spectra of aqueous silk solutions and hydrated silk scaffolds or aqueous silk films and dry scaffolds (Fig. 1C), further supporting our conclusion that spectral shape can be correlated to β sheet content of silk fibroin samples.

Figure 1
Two photon excited fluorescence spectra of silk biomaterials

In processed biomaterials, β sheets are formed by increasing hydrophobic interactions, which generate crystalline domains. These domains are insoluble in water and contribute to the environmental stability and mechanical properties of the protein-based material, acting as physical crosslinks[35,37,46,47]. Thus, the ability to assess β sheet content non-invasively by TPEF spectroscopy could serve as an important quality control or monitoring tool for assessing the conformation and the dynamic changes in silk protein structures prior to and following cell interactions and implantation for tissue engineering applications. Tracking changes in this feature would also provide a direct window into degradation profiles during scaffold and tissue regeneration in vitro or in vivo.

3.2. Assessment of hydration in silk fibroin biomaterials through TPEF emission spectra

Further examination of the TPEF spectral features reveals that emission is sensitive not only to the β sheet content of the sample, but also to the environment surrounding the silk fibroin. Specifically, as shown in Figure 1C, we observe a blue shift in the emission spectra that correlates with a decrease in hydration, which is expected to have an impact primarily on the noncrystalline regions of the silk protein. For example, drying of the aqueous solution results in a film with a blue shifted emission spectrum (Fig. 1C). The fibroin in both the film and the solution is in random coil and α helix conformations, as confirmed by FTIR studies (Figure 1E). Similarly, a dry silk scaffold has a blue shifted TPEF spectrum compared to that of a hydrated silk scaffold (Figure 1C). A TPEF spectrum from natural silk fibers is also included in Fig. 1C and it exhibits very similar features to those of a dry silk scaffold.

Spectral shifts in response to a more polar environment have been observed for chromophores such as tryptophan, and are typically attributed to changes in the relaxation of the molecule because of polar interactions or the formation of hydrogen bound complexes in the excited state[4850]. We expect that similar processes are responsible for the observed red shift in the silk spectra of samples exposed to more highly hydrated environments, depicted schematically in Fig. 1D.

Since enhanced hydration has been correlated with changes in viscoelastic properties in studies involving both silkworm [51] and spider silk [52], the observed spectral shifts may be used to non-invasively assess features associated with the expected mechanical behavior of silk-based tissue engineered constructs. This would include dynamic changes in vitro and in vivo during matrix remodeling.

3.3. Characterization of silk fibroin biomaterial morphology through TPEF and SHG images

Acquisition of TPEF spectral information is essential for characterizing and understanding the shifts that are reported in Figure 1. However, based on the spectral details of fibroin fluorescence emission, it is possible to identify a small number of wavelength regions that are sensitive to the observed dependencies on silk II content and hydration. The appropriate choice of emission filters to cover these spectral windows provides for a simpler, more efficient method of monitoring changes in the fluorescence properties of silk biomaterials. The histogram in Figure 1F represents such an approach, based on calculation of the ratio of the average fluorescence intensity from images collected through two optical filters covering the 410–485 nm and 500–550 nm regions. The aqueous silk solution, with the most red-shifted emission spectrum has the lowest fluorescence ratio, while dry silk scaffolds and natural fibers have the highest ratio (Figure 1F). The gradual blue shift observed in the emission spectrum from aqueous solution, to film (aqueous and HFIP-treated) and film with β sheet content is reflected in the progressive increase of the fluorescence ratio as well (Figure 1F). The red shift of the emission spectrum due to hydration of the silk scaffold corresponds to a decrease of the fluorescence ratio from dry to hydrated scaffold (Figure 1F). Finally, the fluorescence ratio from hydrogels lies between hydrated and dry silk scaffolds indicating a balance between the contributions from β sheets and the affects of hydration on the TPEF emission. This also indicates a current limitation of the technique to isolate the spectral effects of hydration and β sheet composition, i.e. if both properties are changing at the same time it would not be possible for TPEF to separate their contributions to the corresponding spectral shifts.

TPEF images (red) were acquired from the different silk samples at these two spectral emission bands along with corresponding SHG images (green) (Fig. 2). Only the TPEF images acquired in the 500–550 nm window are included in Figure 2, since the morphological features revealed by the images in the 410–485 nm region are nearly identical. We find that individual natural silk fibres, containing highly oriented secondary structures (Figure 2C) possess strong TPEF and SHG signals and can be easily distinguished (Fig. 2A and 2B). The fibers are processed into aqueous solutions from which films, hydrogels and scaffolds are made. Fibroin films cast from this solution are uniformly fluorescent, but they do not produce SHG (Fig. 2D and 2E). Representative images are shown from an aqueous, β sheet containing (i.e. methanol-treated) film, whose main structural features are depicted schematically in Figure 2F; a similar uniform morphology is also detected from non-methanol treated aqueous and HFIP-processed silk films (data not shown). Addition of HCl to the aqueous solutions alters the pH and results in the induction of β sheets and the formation of hydrogels that are fluorescent and exhibit no SHG (Fig. 2J – 2L). The heterogeneous distribution of the protein resulting from the addition of 6% HCl to a 4% silk solution can be seen in the fluorescence image. Scaffolds processed from the aqueous solution are strongly fluorescent and, in contrast to the film and gel samples, they exhibit SHG signal that is typically localized along pore edges (Fig. 2M and 2N). The gross morphology, pore size and surface roughness of the aqueous scaffold are easily discerned in the fluorescent image.

Figure 2
Two photon excited fluorescence and second harmonic generation images of silk biomaterials

Morphological characterization of biomaterial features such as surface roughness are important with respect to material and tissue mechanical properties, cell interactions, tissue regeneration and remodeling in vivo and in vitro. [18,38,38,39,53]. This information is made readily available via three-dimensional reconstructions of TPEF-based optical sections, as shown in Figure 3 and and4.4. For example, significant differences in the morphology of aqueous and HFIP-treated silk scaffolds are seen in Fig. 3A and 3C, consistent with SEM observations (Fig. 3B and 3D). Very distinct architectures have also been observed in silk hydrogels created from different relative concentrations of silk and HCl (Fig. 3E and 3G). The highly uniform and the fibrillar morphologies achieved with the 8% silk, 6% HCl and 4% silk, 6% HCl, respectively, are confirmed by SEM (Fig. 3F and 3H). The level of architectural and morphological detail in all cases resembles closely that of SEM images acquired to assess features that are relevant in the 1–1000μm regime. Additionally these reconstructions of TPEF optical sections can be used to non invasively assess pore size and interconnections in true three dimensional fashion as depicted in the images of 3D models of aqueous scaffold sections (Figure 4 and corresponding animations). The image stack acquired with the 10X objective includes information from depths that are nearly 1 mm away from the surface, demonstrating the capability of the technique to assess architectural features over dimensions that are highly appropriate for tissue engineering applications.

Figure 3
TPEF and SEM images of silk hydrogels and scaffolds
Figure 4
Three dimensional assessment of scaffold morphology

The combined use of TPEF and SHG imaging not only provides a useful means of assessing morphological and structural features of silk scaffolds, but it also allows distinction of the silk features from those of other extracellular matrix proteins, such as collagen (Figure 5). Several studies have exploited SHG to visualize individual collagen fibers within engineered[54], ex vivo [26,55] and in vivo tissues[56]. A superposition of TPEF and SHG image stacks from a silk scaffold containing collagen fibers within its pores illustrates that it is possible to visualize both components relying entirely on endogenous sources of optical contrast (Figure 5). This is possible because TPEF emission dominates the nonlinear optical response of silk, while collagen fibers yield strong SHG. Thus, non-invasive characterization and monitoring of the changes in scaffold content and structure in relationship to the deposited collagen matrix should be feasible during engineered tissue growth.

Figure 5
Combined SHG and TPEF imaging

3.4 Structural origin of SHG from silk fibroin biomaterials

Of particular interest was the understanding of the origins of the SHG signal in the natural silk fibers and the silk scaffolds. SHG results from the asymmetric resonant scattering of two long wavelength light waves into a single higher energy wave and is observed from non centrosymmetric systems, such as collagen type I[26,57]. Natural silk fibers also yield a strong SHG signal, and we hypothesized that it originates from the highly oriented α-helical and β-sheet conformations, as depicted schematically in Figure 2C. As mentioned before, the secondary structure and alignment of the silk fibroin molecules is lost during solubilization. Depending on the subsequent processing into films, hydrogels and scaffolds, varying levels of the α-helical and β-sheet conformations are reconstituted, as assessed by FTIR, X-Ray scattering and Raman studies (Figure 1E and other studies [14,39,42,58]). To confirm that SHG requires the presence of aligned secondary structures, we acquired SHG images prior to and following compression and stretching of aqueous, methanol-treated silk films. A comparison of the detected images shown in Figures 2G–H reveals that this type of manipulation indeed leads to SHG. The intensity of the mean fluorescence of an image, and the shape of the emission spectrum did not change after stretching, indicating that a change in the amount of β sheet content was not responsible for the SHG.

To demonstrate that the presence of SHG is directly associated withβ sheet alignment, we performed polarized Raman micro-spectroscopy measurements of natural silk fibers and methanol treated silk films prior to and following compression/stretching. As shown in Figure 6, polarized Raman spectra acquired along the horizontal and vertical orientations relative to the fiber axis exhibit significant differences in the Raman peaks at 1665 and 1228 cm−1, corresponding to the amide I and amide III modes, respectively. This is expected to occur as the C=O stretching (amide I) and the Alanine residue N-H in plane bending and CH2 twisting (amide III) modes of aligned β sheets orient preferentially perpendicular to (amide I) and in parallel with (amide III) the fiber axis[39]. In contrast, the intensity of these peaks is almost identical for the methanol treated aqueous films, indicating the presence of randomly oriented β sheets. However, when the films are compressed and stretched, we detect a significant difference in the intensity of the 1228 cm−1 peak consistent with the induction of increased levels of aligned amide III N-H groups, and, thus, more highly oriented β sheets. Thus, these results support the notion that SHG is sensitive to the orientation of the β-sheets within silk fibroin. Therefore, the presence of SHG along the pores of silk scaffolds indicates the presence of such aligned secondary structures, as depicted in Figure 2O. It is likely that molecular orientation of the amorphous and α-helical domains of the protein also leads to an enhancement in SHG; however, more detailed studies are needed to assess these contributions. Mechanistically, we reported that salt-induced β sheet formation along the pores of the scaffold is responsible for the stabilization of these systems[38]; thus, overall β sheet alignment may still be low in the bulk material, while this localized region lining the pores may be in part responsible for the SHG.

Figure 6
Polarized Raman spectroscopy

4. Conclusion

In summary, the non-linear imaging and spectroscopy approaches outlined here could serve as important tools for assessing and monitoring silk-based and potentially other, biomaterial properties that may be particularly useful in the context of tissue engineering applications (Table 1). Further studies could be performed to enhance the quantitative nature of these measurements and correlate, for example, specific spectral features to pre-determined levels of β-sheet content and hydration. The ability to non-invasively characterize key structural and architectural features of silk-based scaffolds based entirely on endogenous sources of optical contrast prior to and during tissue development should enhance significantly our understanding of the dynamic interactions between these biomaterial matrices and cells. More broadly, we expect that spectroscopic TPEF and SHG imaging will also be applicable to the dynamic characterization of other standard biomaterials, such as PGA, for example, which also exhibits strong non-linear fluorescence and scattering [59]. This, in turn, should allow for more efficient optimization in the design of biomaterials that promote development of functional tissues. Furthermore, the potential to use TPEF and SHG-based imaging not only in vitro but also in vivo makes these approaches particularly attractive as the field of tissue engineering evolves.

Table 1
Correlation of silk optical properties with structural and mechanical properties

Supplementary Material

01

02

Acknowledgments

We thank Xiao Hu for help with FTIR measurements, and Brian Lawrence for his assistance with SEM. Funding for this work was provided by NSF (BES 0547292) and NIH (P41 EB002520). This work made use of MRSEC Shared Facilities supported by the National Science Foundation under Award Number DMR-0213282 and NSF Laser Facility grant #CHE-0111370.

Footnotes

Competing interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interest.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Stevens MM, George JH. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science. 2005;310:1135–1138. [PubMed]
2. Behravesh E, Yasko AW, Engel PS, Mikos AG. Synthetic biodegradable polymers for orthopaedic applications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367(Suppl):S118–29. [PubMed]
3. Agrawal CM, Ray RB. Biodegradable polymeric scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;55:141–150. [PubMed]
4. Hubbell JA. Biomaterials in tissue engineering. Biotechnology (N Y) 1995;13:565–576. [PubMed]
5. Kim TG, Park TG. Biomimicking extracellular matrix: cell adhesive RGD peptide modified electrospun poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanofiber mesh. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:221–233. [PubMed]
6. Mauney JR, Jaquiery C, Volloch V, Heberer M, Martin I, Kaplan DL. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of differentially demineralized cancellous bone scaffolds combined with human bone marrow stromal cells for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2005;26:3173–3185. [PubMed]
7. Mauney JR, Kirker-Head C, Abrahamson L, Gronowicz G, Volloch V, Kaplan DL. Matrix-mediated retention of in vitro osteogenic differentiation potential and in vivo bone-forming capacity by human adult bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells during ex vivo expansion. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;79:464–475. [PubMed]
8. Kim BS, Mooney DJ. Development of biocompatible synthetic extracellular matrices for tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 1998;16:224–230. [PubMed]
9. Griffith LG, Naughton G. Tissue engineering--current challenges and expanding opportunities. Science. 2002;295:1009–1014. [PubMed]
10. Edwards GA, Glattauer V, Nash TJ, White JF, Brock KA, Werkmeister JA, Ramshaw JA. In vivo evaluation of a collagenous membrane as an absorbable adhesion barrier. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;34:291–297. [PubMed]
11. Griffith LG, Swartz MA. Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology in vitro. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7:211–224. [PubMed]
12. Athanasiou KA, Niederauer GG, Agrawal CM. Sterilization, toxicity, biocompatibility and clinical applications of polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymers. Biomaterials. 1996;17:93–102. [PubMed]
13. van Beek JD, Hess S, Vollrath F, Meier BH. The molecular structure of spider dragline silk: folding and orientation of the protein backbone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:10266–10271. [PubMed]
14. Hu X, Kaplan D, Cebe P. Determining beta-sheet crystallinity in fibrous proteins by thermal analysis and infrared spectroscopy. Macromolecules. 2006;39:6161–6170.
15. Asakura T, Ohgo K, Ishida T, Taddei P, Monti P, Kishore R. Possible implications of serine and tyrosine residues and intermolecular interactions on the appearance of silk I structure of Bombyx mori silk fibroin-derived synthetic peptides: high-resolution 13C cross-polarization/magic-angle spinning NMR study. Biomacromolecules. 2005;6:468–474. [PubMed]
16. Zhao C, Yao J, Masuda H, Kishore R, Asakura T. Structural characterization and artificial fiber formation of Bombyx mori silk fibroin in hexafluoro-iso-propanol solvent system. Biopolymers. 2003;69:253–259. [PubMed]
17. Simmons AH, Michal CA, Jelinski LW. Molecular orientation and two-component nature of the crystalline fraction of spider dragline silk. Science. 1996;271:84–87. [PubMed]
18. Kim HJ, Kim UJ, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Min BH, Kaplan DL. Influence of macroporous protein scaffolds on bone tissue engineering from bone marrow stem cells. Biomaterials. 2005;26:4442–4452. [PubMed]
19. Altman GH, Horan RL, Lu HH, Moreau J, Martin I, Richmond JC, Kaplan DL. Silk matrix for tissue engineered anterior cruciate ligaments. Biomaterials. 2002;23:4131–4141. [PubMed]
20. Brehmer B, Rohrmann D, Becker C, Rau G, Jakse G. Different types of scaffolds for reconstruction of the urinary tract by tissue engineering. Urol Int. 2007;78:23–29. [PubMed]
21. Xu CC, Chan RW, Tirunagari N. A Biodegradable, Acellular Xenogeneic Scaffold for Regeneration of the Vocal Fold Lamina Propria. Tissue Eng. 2006 [PubMed]
22. Martin I, Shastri VP, Padera RF, Yang J, Mackay AJ, Langer R, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Freed LE. Selective differentiation of mammalian bone marrow stromal cells cultured on three-dimensional polymer foams. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;55:229–235. [PubMed]
23. Xin X, Hussain M, Mao JJ. Continuing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells and induced chondrogenic and osteogenic lineages in electrospun PLGA nanofiber scaffold. Biomaterials. 2007;28:316–325. [PubMed]
24. Wang Y, Kim UJ, Blasioli DJ, Kim HJ, Kaplan DL. In vitro cartilage tissue engineering with 3D porous aqueous-derived silk scaffolds and mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials. 2005;26:7082–7094. [PubMed]
25. Gonzalez S, Swindells K, Rajadhyaksha M, Torres A. Changing paradigms in dermatology: confocal microscopy in clinical and surgical dermatology. Clin Dermatol. 2003;21:359–369. [PubMed]
26. Zipfel WR, Williams RM, Christie R, Nikitin AY, Hyman BT, Webb WW. Live tissue intrinsic emission microscopy using multiphoton-excited native fluorescence and second harmonic generation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:7075–7080. [PubMed]
27. Ramanujam N. Fluorescence spectroscopy of neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissues. Neoplasia. 2000;2:89–117. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Fujimoto JG. Optical coherence tomography for ultrahigh resolution in vivo imaging. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21:1361–1367. [PubMed]
29. Ntziachristos V, Chance B. Probing physiology and molecular function using optical imaging: applications to breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2001;3:41–46. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Ko HJ, Tan W, Stack R, Boppart SA. Optical coherence elastography of engineered and developing tissue. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:63–73. [PubMed]
31. Tan W, Sendemir-Urkmez A, Fahrner LJ, Jamison R, Leckband D, Boppart SA. Structural and functional optical imaging of three-dimensional engineered tissue development. Tissue Eng. 2004;10:1747–1756. [PubMed]
32. Zoumi A, Yeh A, Tromberg BJ. Imaging cells and extracellular matrix in vivo by using second-harmonic generation and two-photon excited fluorescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:11014–11019. [PubMed]
33. Chandra M, Vishwanath K, Fichter GD, Liao E, Hollister SJ, Mycek MA. Quantitative molecular sensing in biological tissues: an approach to non-invasive optical characterization. Optics Express. 2006;14:6157–6171. [PubMed]
34. Shao Z, Vollrath F. Surprising strength of silkworm silk. Nature. 2002;418:741. [PubMed]
35. Altman GH, Diaz F, Jakuba C, Calabro T, Horan RL, Chen J, Lu H, Richmond J, Kaplan DL. Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2003;24:401–416. [PubMed]
36. Jin HJ, Kaplan DL. Mechanism of silk processing in insects and spiders. Nature. 2003;424:1057–1061. [PubMed]
37. Liu Y, Shao Z, Vollrath F. Relationships between supercontraction and mechanical properties of spider silk. Nat Mater. 2005;4:901–905. [PubMed]
38. Kim UJ, Park J, Kim HJ, Wada M, Kaplan DL. Three-dimensional aqueous-derived biomaterial scaffolds from silk fibroin. Biomaterials. 2005;26:2775–2785. [PubMed]
39. Rousseau ME, Lefevre T, Beaulieu L, Asakura T, Pezolet M. Study of protein conformation and orientation in silkworm and spider silk fibers using Raman microspectroscopy. Biomacromolecules. 2004;5:2247–2257. [PubMed]
40. Jin HJ, Park J, Karageorgiou V, Kim UJ, Valluzzi R, Kaplan DL. Water-stable silk films with reduced beta-sheet content. Advanced Functional Materials. 2005;15:1241–1247.
41. Kim UJ, Park J, Li C, Jin HJ, Valluzzi R, Kaplan DL. Structure and properties of silk hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2004;5:786–792. [PubMed]
42. Matsumoto A, Chen J, Collette AL, Kim UJ, Altman GH, Cebe P, Kaplan DL. Mechanisms of Silk Fibroin Sol-Gel Transitions. J Phys Chem B Condens Matter Mater Surf Interfaces Biophys. 2006;110:21630–21638. [PubMed]
43. Shao Z, Young RJ, Vollrath F. The effect of solvents on spider silk studied by mechanical testing and single-fibre Raman spectroscopy. Int J Biol Macromol. 1999;24:295–300. [PubMed]
44. Georgakoudi I, Tsai I, Greiner C, Wong C, DeFelice J, Kaplan D. Intrinsic fluorescence changes associated with the conformational state of silk fibroin in biomaterial matrices. Optics Express. 2007;15:1043–1053. [PubMed]
45. Zipfel WR, Williams RM, Webb WW. Nonlinear magic: multiphoton microscopy in the biosciences. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21:1369–1377. [PubMed]
46. Bini E, Knight DP, Kaplan DL. Mapping domain structures in silks from insects and spiders related to protein assembly. J Mol Biol. 2004;335:27–40. [PubMed]
47. Huemmerich D, Slotta U, Scheibel T. Processing and modification of films made from recombinant spider silk proteins. Applied Physics A-Materials Science & Processing. 2006;82:219–222.
48. Burstein EA, Abornev SM, Reshetnyak YK. Decomposition of protein tryptophan fluorescence spectra into log-normal components. I. Decomposition algorithms. Biophys J. 2001;81:1699–1709. [PubMed]
49. Reshetnyak YK, Burstein EA. Decomposition of protein tryptophan fluorescence spectra into log-normal components. II. The statistical proof of discreteness of tryptophan classes in proteins. Biophys J. 2001;81:1710–1734. [PubMed]
50. Reshetnyak YK, Koshevnik Y, Burstein EA. Decomposition of protein tryptophan fluorescence spectra into log-normal components. III. Correlation between fluorescence and microenvironment parameters of individual tryptophan residues. Biophys J. 2001;81:1735–1758. [PubMed]
51. Perez-Rigueiro J, Viney C, Llorca J, Elices M. Mechanical properties of silkworm silk in liquid media. Polymer. 2000;41:8433–8439.
52. Bell FI, McEwen IJ, Viney C. Fibre science: supercontraction stress in wet spider dragline. Nature. 2002;416:37. [PubMed]
53. Karageorgiou V, Meinel L, Hofmann S, Malhotra A, Volloch V, Kaplan D. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 decorated silk fibroin films induce osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;71:528–537. [PubMed]
54. Zoumi A, Yeh A, Tromberg BJ. Imaging cells and extracellular matrix in vivo by using second-harmonic generation and two-photon excited fluorescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:11014–11019. [PubMed]
55. Williams RM, Zipfel WR, Webb WW. Interpreting second-harmonic generation images of collagen I fibrils. Biophys J. 2005;88:1377–1386. [PubMed]
56. Brown E, McKee T, diTomaso E, Pluen A, Seed B, Boucher Y, Jain RK. Dynamic imaging of collagen and its modulation in tumors in vivo using second-harmonic generation. Nat Med. 2003;9:796–800. [PubMed]
57. Gubler U, Bosshard C. Optical materials: A new twist for nonlinear optics. Nat Mater. 2002;1:209–210. [PubMed]
58. Foo CWP, Bini E, Huang J, Lee SY, Kaplan DL. Solution behavior of synthetic silk peptides and modified recombinant silk proteins. Applied Physics A-Materials Science & Processing. 2006;82:193–203.
59. Lee HS, Teng SW, Chen HC, Lo W, Sun Y, Lin TY, Chiou LL, Jiang CC, Dong CY. Imaging Human Bone Marrow Stem Cell Morphogenesis in Polyglycolic Acid Scaffold by Multiphoton Microscopy. Tissue Eng. 2006 [PubMed]