PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Cancer Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC Sep 2, 2009.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2736608
NIHMSID: NIHMS121583
BAP1 is a tumor suppressor that requires deubiquitinating activity and nuclear localization
Karen H. Ventii,1 Narra S. Devi,2,4 Kenneth L. Friedrich,1* Tatiana A. Chernova,1 Mourad Tighiouart,3,4 Erwin G. Van Meir,2,4 and Keith D. Wilkinson1
1Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322.
2Laboratory of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, Departments of Neurosurgery, Hematology/Oncology.
3Emory University Biostatistics Research and Informatics.
4Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. 30322.
Requests for reprint: Keith D. Wilkinson, Emory University, Department of Biochemistry, 1510 Clifton Road, Room 4017, Rollins Research building, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA. Phone: 404-727-5980; Fax: 404 727-3452; E-mail: genekdw/at/emory.edu
*Current address: Department of Chemistry, Allied Health and Science Division, Portland Community College, Cascade Campus, Portland, OR 97217.
BAP1 (BRCA1-associated protein-1), a deubiquitinating enzyme of unknown cellular function, is mutated in breast and lung cancers. In this study, we have demonstrated for the first time that BAP1 has tumor suppressor activity in vivo by showing that BAP1 can suppress tumorigenicity of lung cancer cells in athymic nude mice. We show that BAP1 fulfills another criterion of a genuine tumor suppressor because cancer-associated mutations in BAP1 result in a protein deficient in deubiquitinating activity. We show for the first time that one of the two predicted nuclear targeting motifs is required for nuclear localization of BAP1 and that a truncation mutant found in a lung cancer cell line results in BAP1 that fails to localize to the nucleus. Furthermore, we demonstrate that deubiquitinating activity and nuclear localization are both required for BAP1-mediated tumor suppression in nude mice. We show that BAP1 exerts its tumor suppressor functions by affecting the cell cycle; speeding the progression through the G1/S checkpoint and inducing cell death via a process that has characteristics of both apoptosis and necrosis. Surprisingly, BAP1-mediated growth suppression is independent of wild-type BRCA1. Since deubiquitinating enzymes are components of the ubiquitin proteasome system, this pathway has emerged as an important target for anti-cancer drugs. The identification of the deubiquitinating enzyme BAP1 as a tumor suppressor may lead to further understanding of how the ubiquitin proteasome system contributes to cancer and aid in the identification of new targets for cancer therapy.
Keywords: BAP1, BRCA1, ubiquitin, cancer
Lung cancer is the leading worldwide source of cancer-related deaths (1) and breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women (2). BAP1 (BRCA1-associated protein-1) is a component of the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) that has been implicated in lung and breast cancers (3). Because mutations in UPS genes have been implicated in cancer, the UPS has emerged as a potential target for anti-cancer drugs (4, 5).
The UPS functions in the selective degradation of numerous short-lived proteins in eukaryotic cells (6). In this system, ubiquitin is covalently conjugated to target proteins (7). The attachment of ubiquitin to a substrate molecule can act as a targeting signal by delivering the modified protein to different locations in the cell or modifying its activity, macromolecular interactions, or half-life (8). One way to regulate ubiquitin-modified proteins is through deubiquitination, the removal of the ubiquitin modification, performed by deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) (9).
BAP1 is a DUB originally identified as a protein interacting with the RING finger domain of the breast cancer susceptibility gene product BRCA1 (3). BAP1 is a nuclear localized DUB with an N-terminal ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (UCH) domain and two predicted nuclear-localization signals (NLSs). Because the full-length human BRCA1 is a ubiquitin ligase, it was hypothesized that autoubiquitinated BRCA1 might be a substrate for BAP1 deubiquitinating activity (3). It was later shown however, that BAP1 does not appear to function in the deubiquitination of the BRCA1/BARD1 complex (10). There is no evidence that BRCA1 is a direct, biologically relevant substrate for BAP1 and therefore, the biological function of BAP1 remains to be identified.
While its cellular function is still elusive, several lines of evidence support a role for BAP1 as a tumor suppressor: the BAP1 gene locus undergoes frequent loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in cancer; large rearrangements, deletions, and missense mutations in the BAP1 gene locus have been found in lung and sporadic breast tumors and lung cancer cell lines (3, 11); and BAP1 suppresses growth of breast cancer cells in vitro (3). Despite the evidence to suggest that BAP1 is a tumor suppressor, it remains unknown whether BAP1 fulfills a critical criterion of tumor suppressors-the ability to suppress tumor growth in vivo. Furthermore, it is unknown whether cancer-associated BAP1 mutations affect protein function.
In this study, we sought to characterize the in vivo growth suppression phenotype of BAP1, to determine if it was a genuine tumor suppressor, to ask whether the mutations found in cancer cells inactivated protein function and whether BAP1 exerted its tumor suppressor activity through the BRCA1 pathway.
DNA constructs and antibodies
BAP1 was amplified by PCR from pQE-30-BAP1 (3). For expression in E. coli, full-length BAP1 was amplified using primers that introduced an N-terminal FLAG tag and C-terminal His6 tag and subcloned into NdeI/BamHI digested pRSET B vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) to create pFLAG-BAP1-His6. For localization studies, full length and truncated (1–393) BAP1 were amplified using primers that introduced an N-terminal HA tag and subcloned into BamHI/EcoRI digested eGFP-N1 vector (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) to create pHA-BAP1-GFP or pHA-BAP1 (1–393)-GFP. For growth and tumor suppression studies, BAP1 was amplified and subcloned into pLenti6/V5 vector using the pLenti6/V5 Directional TOPO Cloning Kit (Invitrogen) to create pLenti-BAP1. All point mutations were introduced using the QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and verified by DNA sequencing. Figure 1 shows all point and truncation mutants used in this study. Putative NLS1 and NLS2 (amino acids 656–661, and 717–722 of BAP1, respectively) were cloned upstream of two consecutive GFPs (called dGFP vector in this study; a gift from Dr. Anita H. Corbett, Emory University) to form pNLS1-dGFP and pNLS2-dGFP. Anti-FLAG (M2) (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., St. Louis, MO), for detection of FLAG-BAP1-His6, anti-BAP1 (C4) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc, Santa Cruz, CA), anti-Myc (9B11), for detection of Myc-tagged BRCA1 in HCC1937-BRCA1 cells (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA), and anti-Actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc) antibodies were used for immunoblotting.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Depiction of BAP1 constructs used in this study. UCH (ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase), NLS (nuclear localization signal).
Cell culture
HeLa (human cervical adenocarcinoma) cells were maintained in Minimum Essential Medium supplemented with 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Mediatech Inc., Manassas, VA). NCI-H226 (human non-small cell lung cancer) cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS. NCI-H226 cells from passage one to ten were used for all experiments. NCI-H226 and HeLa cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). HCC1937 (human breast carcinoma) cells and HCC1937 cells stably transfected with Myc epitope–tagged wild-type BRCA1 (HCC1937-BRCA1) (gifts from Dr. Junjie Chen, Yale University) were maintained in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS (12). 293FT (human embryonal kidney) cells were maintained in Complete Medium according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen). All cells were cultured in a humidified chamber at 37°C in 5% CO2.
Enzymatic activity assay
Enzyme activity assays for BAP1 were performed as previously described using Ub-AMC substrate (ubiquitin C-terminal 7-amido-4-methylcoumarin) (13). Briefly, BL21(DE3) pLysS cells (Invitrogen) harboring the IPTG-inducible FLAG-BAP1-His6 plasmid were grown to OD600 of 0.8 and induced with 20 µM IPTG at 15°C for 24 h. Bacteria were collected and the pellet resuspended to 1/20 volume (original culture) in lysis buffer (300 mM NaCl, 50 mM sodium phosphate, 20 mM imidazole, 10 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, 1% Triton X-100, pH 8.0). Lysates were sonicated and centrifuged at 13,000 g. The amount of BAP1 protein in the crude extracts was estimated by immunoblot using anti-FLAG (M2). In some experiments crude extracts were used for subsequent activity assays. In others BAP1 was purified using Ni-NTA resin according to the QIAexpressionist protocol (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Eluted BAP1 was extensively dialyzed (50 mM TRIS-HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1% TritonX-100, 2 mM beta-mercaptoethanol) before use in activity assays. Ub-AMC was made according to previously published protocols (13). Ub-AMC (80 nM) was incubated in reaction buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 1 mM DTT, 10 µg/ml ovalbumin) for 100 sec. Purified wild-type FLAG-BAP1-His6 (0.1 µg) or E. coli cell lysate (10 µg) expressing wild-type or mutant FLAG-BAP1-His6 was added and the reaction monitored by measuring the increase in fluorescence at 440 nm (λex= 340 nm) using a fluorimeter (Aminco Bowman Series 2). Activity assays were carried out in triplicate at 37°C.
Direct fluorescent imaging
HeLa cells were seeded in six-well plates (3×105 cells per well). Cells were transfected after 24 h with 2 µg purified wild-type or mutant HA-BAP1-GFP DNA or purified NLS-dGFP DNA using standard Fugene 6 transfection protocols (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). After 24 h cellular DNA was labeled with 5 ng/µl bis-benzimide (Hoechst 33258) and incubated at 37°C for 15 min. Live cell imaging was performed with an Olympus fluorescent microscope IX-81 (Olympus America Inc.) and SlideBook 4.2 software.
Lentivirus production and transduction
Lentiviruses carrying vector alone or vector encoding wild-type or mutant BAP1 were produced with the ViraPowerTM Lentiviral Expression System (Invitrogen). These vectors carry a Blasticidin-resistance gene for selection of stably transduced cells. Virus-containing medium was harvested 48 h post transfection from 293FT cells according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Each viral stock was titered separately by quantifying viral DNA in transduced cells (similar to Sastry et al. (14)) and by quantifying the percentage of cells expressing BAP1 (via immunofluorescence with anti-BAP1 (C4) antibody). NCI-H226 cells were infected with lentiviruses at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1–3.
Growth suppression studies
NCI-H226 cells (1×105) were seeded in triplicate in six-well plates. After 24 h cells were infected with lentiviruses carrying vector alone (VC) or vector encoding wild-type or mutant BAP1 so that approximately 10% of the cells in each well were infected. An additional control well was not infected with virus. Viral medium was removed after 24 h and replaced with RPMI-1640/FBS. After 24 h this was replaced with selective medium (RMPI-1640/FBS supplemented with 1 µg/ml Blasticidin). Selective medium was replaced every three-four days until all non-infected cells were dead. Cells were washed with PBS and stained with crystal violet according to the ViraPowerTM protocol. The number of surviving colonies in each well was counted with a colony counter (Bel-Art Products).
Tumorigenicity assay
All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Emory University School of Medicine. NCI-H226 cells (1×106) infected with lentiviruses carrying vector alone, WT BAP1 or mutant BAP1 were injected subcutaneously (s.c.) on the rear flank of 5–6-week-old athymic nu/nu female mice (n=9) and tumorigenesis was monitored for 50 days. NCI-H226 cells were infected with an MOI of 3 with almost 100% cells expressing BAP1 protein. Cells injected into mice were not subjected to antibiotic selection and therefore represent pooled clones. Each mouse was identified by tattooing as previously described (15). Mice were weighed and tumors measured every ten days starting two weeks after injection. The mean tumor volume was calculated assuming an ellipsoid morphology (length x width2 x ½). Each data set was tested for outliers with the Grubb’s test (extreme studentized deviate) and each contained one outlier (in every case the mouse bearing the largest tumor) with p-value < 0.05, single tailed. After removal of the outliers, statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA with repeated measurements: p-value = 0.0009. Differences in measurements with p-value < 0.05 were considered significant. Animals were sacrificed in a CO2 chamber and tumors removed aseptically in a laminar flow hood.
Cell cycle analysis
NCI-H226 cells expressing vector alone or wild-type BAP1 were harvested by trypsinization 24h after Blasticidin selection and washed twice with ice-cold PBS. Cells were fixed in 70% ethanol at 4°C overnight, washed twice in PBS, re-suspended (1 × 105 cells/ml) in staining buffer (1 mg/ml RNase A, 0.05 mg/ml propidium iodide, 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS), incubated at room temperature for 45 min in the dark and analyzed by flow cytometry (BD FACSCaliburTM System, Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) using Cell Quest software.
AnnexinV binding assay
NCI-H226 cells (1×106) were infected with lentiviruses carrying vector alone or vector encoding WT, or mutant BAP1. Cells were analyzed for externalization of phosphatidylserine 48 h and 120 h after Blasticidin selection by staining with 5 mg AnnexinV-FITC (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) and 1 µg/ml propidium iodide (PI) in 100 µl HEPES buffer (10 mM HEPES, 140 mM NaCl, 2.5mM CaCl2, pH 7.4) at 4°C for 15 min. Following incubation, an additional 300 µl of HEPES buffer was added. Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry.
Cell growth and cell viability assays
NCI-H226 cells (0.5 × 105 cells/well) were infected with lentiviruses carrying empty vector or WT BAP1 constructs at an MOI of 3 so that almost 100% cells were infected. Total cell numbers were quantified via hemacytometer after 6, 12, 14 and 21 days. At each time point, cells were stained with 0.8 mM trypan blue (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc) to distinguish live and dead cells.
Cancer-associated BAP1 mutants have diminished deubiquitinating activity
Recombinant BAP1 has previously been shown to display ubiquitin hydrolase activity towards a model DUB substrate (3). Mutations in BAP1 that result in single amino acid substitutions (A95D and G178V) within the UCH domain have been identified in lung cancers (16). These residues are close to the active site cysteine (C91) (Figure 1) and are highly conserved in BAP1 orthologs (Figure 2A).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cancer-associated mutations in BAP1 result in protein lacking deubiquitinating activity. (A) Alignment of BAP1 N-terminal region from different species showing that the catalytic cysteine 91 (yellow box) and residues mutated in cancer cell lines alanine (more ...)
To test how these cancer-associated mutations affect deubiquitinating activity of BAP1, we measured activity using the in vitro DUB substrate Ub-AMC (13). Wild-type BAP1 was able to hydrolyze Ub-AMC, while the active site point mutant (C91A) had no activity and the cancer-associated BAP1 mutants (A95D and G178V) were much less active (Figure 2B). Immunoblot analysis of E. coli cell lysates showed equivalent amounts of wild-type or mutant BAP1 protein expressed (Figure 2C). The specific activity of BAP1-expressing E. coli lysates was determined (Figure 2C). BAP1 G178V showed low activity while C91A and A95D were essentially inactive. Thus, these cancer-associated mutations reduce catalytic activity by over two orders of magnitude.
To test whether BAP1 DUB activity could be inhibited by the DUB-specific irreversible inhibitor Ub-VS, BAP1 protein was purified by Ni-NTA chromatography and tested for the ability to hydrolyze Ub-AMC in the presence or absence of Ub-VS. As shown in Figure 2D, purified BAP1 was able to hydrolyze Ub-AMC and this was inhibited by the addition of saturating amounts of Ub-VS. Whereas wild-type BAP1 was irreversibly labeled by Ub-VS, the active site point mutant (C91A) and the two cancer-associated mutants that had significantly reduced DUB activity (A95D and G178V) were not labeled (data not shown), implying that the structure of the BAP1 active site is altered in these mutants. Together, our data show that cancer-associated BAP1 mutants have diminished deubiquitinating activity, suggesting that deubiquitinating activity of BAP1 may be important in cancer pathogenesis.
BAP1 has a functional nuclear localization signal
BAP1 is primarily localized to the nucleus at steady state in Rh30 human rhabdomyosarcoma cells (3). To understand the importance of localization for BAP1 function we first had to define a nuclear targeting signal. Previous studies defined two putative NLS motifs: NLS1 (KRKKFK) and NLS2 (RRKRSR) (3) which are conserved in BAP1 orthologs (Figure 3A).
Figure 3
Figure 3
NLS2 is required for nuclear localization of BAP1. (A) Alignment of C-terminal region of BAP1 orthologs showing conservation of predicted nuclear targeting signals. The alignment was performed using ClustalW alignment and MegAlign 7.1.0 software. NCBI (more ...)
To determine whether the NLS sequences of BAP1 are functional, each NLS was cloned into dGFP to produce NLS1-dGFP and NLS2-dGFP. Localization of the expressed proteins in HeLa cells was assessed by direct fluorescence microscopy. Each NLS sequence was sufficient to localize GFP to the nucleus (Figure 3B, panels B and D). Mutant forms of each fusion protein were created in which all five basic residues were mutated to alanine. These mutant NLS-dGFP fusion proteins (Figure 3B, panels C and E) generated a signal similar to that of the dGFP vector alone.
To determine whether these predicted NLS motifs are required for nuclear localization of full-length BAP1, HA-BAP1-GFP fusion proteins were prepared in which each predicted NLS was mutated separately (BAP1 NLS1-Ala and BAP1 NLS2-Ala, see Figure 1) and the effect on localization of BAP1 in HeLa cells was assessed. Wild-type BAP1 localized primarily in the nucleus with some protein in the cytoplasm (Figure 3C, panels A-C). Mutant BAP1 in which all basic residues in the first predicted NLS had been converted to alanine (BAP1 NLS1-Ala) localized to the nucleus (Figure 3C, panels D-F). Mutant BAP1 in which all basic residues in the second predicted NLS had been converted to alanine (BAP1 NLS2-Ala) showed a significant decrease in nuclear accumulation of BAP1 (Figure 3C panels G-I), suggesting that only NLS2 is required for nuclear localization of BAP1.
A homozygous 8bp deletion was detected in BAP1 cDNA from the non-small cell lung carcinoma cell line NCI-H1466 (3) that would result in a truncation at residue 393 and a protein lacking the nuclear targeting signal (NLS2). To test whether or not amino acids 1–393 of BAP1 could efficiently be targeted to the nucleus, an HA-BAP1-GFP construct was created that expressed residues 1–393 (BAP1 (1–393), Figure 1) and its localization in HeLa cells was assessed. As predicted, BAP1 (1–393) was restricted to the cytoplasm (Figure 3C, panels J-L). This confirms that the C-terminus of BAP1 contains a signal required for nuclear localization and suggests that nuclear localization of BAP1 may be important in cancer pathogenesis. In addition to affecting nuclear localization of BAP1, a truncation at amino acid 393 may also affect other protein-protein interactions (such as the interaction with BRCA1) and therefore the impact of BAP1 nuclear localization on cancer pathogenesis cannot be inferred from this observation alone.
To determine whether mutants that affect DUB activity of BAP1 also have an effect on localization of the protein, the following HA-BAP1-GFP point mutants were made: C91A, the active site point mutant and A95D and G178V, two cancer-associated mutants with greatly reduced DUB activity. These mutants were expressed in HeLa cells and localization was analyzed by direct fluorescence microscopy. All three BAP1 mutants defective in deubiquitinating activity still retained nuclear localization (Figure 3C, panels M-U), implying that the effect of BAP1 A95D and BAP1 G178V in cancer is primarily due to the lack of deubiquitinating activity.
We next analyzed whether mutations that abrogate nuclear localization also have an effect on deubiquitinating activity in vitro (Figure 3D). BAP1 (1–393), BAP1 NLS1-Ala and BAP1 NLS2-Ala were expressed in E .coli and crude cell extracts were tested for the ability to hydrolyze Ub-AMC. All three mutants were able to hydrolyze Ub-AMC and their specific activities were similar to that of wild-type BAP1. Immunoblot analysis of E. coli cell lysates showed equivalent levels of expression of wild-type and mutant BAP1 (Figure 3D). Together, our data show for the first time that BAP1 has a functional classical NLS and that a cancer-associated truncation mutant lacks nuclear localization but not deubiquitinating activity, while other cancer-associated point mutants lack deubiquitinating activity but not nuclear localization. These results suggest that nuclear localization of BAP1 is important in cancer pathogenesis.
Deubiquitinating activity and nuclear localization are required for BAP1-mediated growth suppression of NCI-H226 cells in vitro
NCI-H226 is a non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line that harbors a deletion at the BAP1 locus (3). We confirmed that this cell line does not express BAP1 protein (Figure 4A, lane 1). We used a lentivirus expression system to reintroduce BAP1 into this null background. To validate our expression system, NCI-H226 cells were infected with lentiviruses carrying vector alone or vector encoding wild-type BAP1 and after 48 h the levels of BAP1 protein were analyzed by immunoblotting. Using the lentivirus expression system, BAP1 was expressed at levels comparable to endogenous WT BAP1 protein found in HeLa and 293 FT cells (Figure 4A). We estimate that expression of BAP is on the same order of magnitude as in other cells and tissues suggesting that the effects observed are not due to massive overexpression.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Deubiquitinating activity and nuclear localization are required for BAP1-mediated growth suppression of NCI-H226 cells in vitro. (A) Immunoblot analysis of lentivirus-expressed BAP1 in NCI-H226 cells compared to endogenous WT BAP1 in cultured cell lines: (more ...)
Using colony formation assays, BAP1 was previously shown to suppress growth of MCF7 breast cancer cells in vitro (3). To ask if BAP1 could suppress growth of NCI-H226 cells in vitro, NCI-H226 cells were infected with lentiviruses carrying vector alone or vector encoding wild-type or mutant BAP1. Immunoblot analysis showed equivalent amounts of mutant or wild-type BAP1 48 h after infection (Figure 4B). After growth in selective medium the number of surviving colonies was quantified using crystal violet staining and the data represented graphically (Figure 4C). The mean vector control colony number was set at 100% and the number of surviving colonies in all other groups was represented as a percentage of the control mean. Expression of wild-type BAP1 resulted in strong growth suppression (almost 100%), while the expression of active site or nuclear localization mutants had very slight or no effect (0–30%) (Figure 4C). We observed some correlation between the level of enzyme activity and ability to suppress growth. Recombinant BAP1 C91A and BAP1 A95D had almost undetectable deubiquitinating activity but the specific activity of BAP1 G178V was approximately ten-fold higher (Figure 2B and Figure 2C). Correspondingly, the BAP1 G178V mutant showed some growth suppression of NCI-H226 cells (approximately 30%), compared to the C91A (0%) and A95D (5%) mutants (Figure 4C), thus supporting a requirement for BAP1 deubiquitinating activity in growth suppression. BAP1 NLS2-Ala, a mutant that is unable to localize to the nucleus demonstrated approximately 10% growth suppression, suggesting that DUB activity and nuclear localization of BAP1 are both required for growth suppression of NCI-H226 cells in vitro. Finally, to confirm that BAP1-mediated growth suppression was independent of cell-type, the growth suppression assay was repeated using HeLa cells. We found that over-expression of WT BAP1 resulted in approximately 60% growth suppression in HeLa cells (data not shown). Together, our data not only confirm that BAP1 has a growth suppressive affect in vitro (3) but also demonstrate that mutants with decreased catalytic activity or mutants defective in nuclear localization also have decreased growth suppressor activity.
BAP1-mediated growth suppression is independent of wild-type BRCA1 expression
BAP1 has been hypothesized to function in BRCA1-mediated processes (3). To test whether BAP1-mediated growth suppression was dependent on BRCA1 function, the growth suppression assay was repeated using the human breast carcinoma cell line, HCC1937 that lacks wild-type BRCA1 (17) as well as BRCA1-reconstituted HCC1937 cells (HCC1937-BRCA1). It is prudent to note that although HCC1937 cells lack wild-type BRCA1 they express a truncated form of the protein that lacks the functional BRCT motifs. Several lines of evidence show that re-expressed full-length tagged BRCA1 in HCC1937-BRCA1 is functionally active: one study showed that this cell line (but not in HCC1937) is able to ubiquitinate CtIP (a binding partner that interacts with the BRCT motifs (18); another study showed that this cell line (but not in HCC1937) could efficiently repair double strand breaks after ionizing radiation (19). The mean colony number of HCC1937 cells infected with vector alone-carrying viruses (HCC1937-VC) was set at 100% (interpreted as 0% growth suppression) and the number of surviving colonies in the other groups was represented as a percentage of this (Figure 4D). Over-expression of BAP1 had a growth suppressive effect (approximately 60%) on HCC1937 as well as on HCC1937-BRCA1 cells (approximately 80%), Figure 4D (lanes 2 and 4), demonstrating that BAP1-mediated growth suppression does not require wild-type BRCA1.
Deubiquitinating activity and nuclear localization are required for BAP1-mediated tumor suppression in vivo
One important property of a tumor suppressor is the ability to suppress tumorigenesis in vivo. NCI-H226 cells are tumorigenic in nude mice (20) so we were able to test the hypothesis that deubiquitinating activity and nuclear localization of BAP1 are required for tumor suppression. NCI-H226 cells expressing vector alone, wild-type or mutant BAP1 were injected s.c. into nu/nu mice. A subset of each cell population was analyzed with trypan blue vital stain to confirm that viable cells were being injected into the mice. Tumors were analyzed by two parameters: tumor growth rate (mm3/day), Figure 5A, and final tumor volume (mm3), Figure 5B. We found that expression of WT BAP1 significantly abolished tumorigenicity of NCI-H226 cells while expression of BAP1 that lacks deubiquitinating activity (C91A) or nuclear localization (NLS2-Ala) did not suppress tumorigenicity. After 50 days of growth WT BAP1 tumors reached a final volume of only 37 mm3. This was significantly smaller than control (VC), BAP1 C91A or BAP1 NLS2-Ala tumors (Figure 5C), which reached final volumes of 567 mm3, 426 mm3 and 338 mm3 respectively (p-values are 0.0006, 0.0001 and 0.016 respectively, when compared to WT BAP1). The other p-values demonstrated that there was not a significant difference between the other tumors: VC vs. C19A=0.1143; VC vs. NLS2-Ala=0.1206; C91A vs. NLS2-Ala=0.6844. We conclude that BAP1 is a tumor suppressor that requires its deubiquitinating activity and nuclear localization for tumor suppression in NCI-H226 cells.
Figure 5
Figure 5
BAP1-mediated suppression of NCI-H226 cell tumorigenicity in vivo requires deubiquitinating activity and nuclear localization. Athymic nu/nu female mice (5–6 weeks old) were injected subcutaneously with 1×106 NCI-H226 cells carrying vector (more ...)
BAP1 suppresses cell viability and growth
To define the molecular mechanisms behind BAP1-mediated growth suppression, 1) flow cytometry analysis was used to investigate the effect of BAP1 on alterations in DNA content, cell cycle distribution, and apoptosis and 2) a growth curve of BAP1-expressing cells vs. control cells was done.
Expression of WT BAP1 resulted in a cell cycle defect compared to cells expressing vector alone or mutant BAP1 (C91A or NLS2-Ala). There were approximately 20% fewer cells in G0/G1 compared to the other cell lines, a slight accumulation of cells in S-phase and approximately 10% increase in the sub-G0/G1 population (indicative of apoptosis) (Figure 6A).
Figure 6
Figure 6
BAP1 alters cell cycle distribution and induces cell death in NCI-H226 cells. NCI-H226 (BAP1-null) cells (1×106) were infected with lentiviruses carrying vector alone (VC) or vector encoding WT, C91A or NLS2-Ala BAP1. An additional control well (more ...)
Cells were analyzed for binding to AnnexinV at 48 h and 120 h after Blasticidin selection. AnnexinV-positive/PI-negative cells are indicative of early apoptosis, while AnnexinV-positive/PI-positive cells are indicative of late apoptosis and/or necrosis. At 48 h, WT BAP1-expressing cells showed a significant increase (43%) in early apoptosis compared to VC (9%), C91A (18%) and NLS2-Ala (26%) cells. By 120 h, most WT BAP1-expressing cells were in late apoptosis/necrosis (55%). Control and mutant cell lines showed similar profiles at 48 h (data not shown) and 120 h (Figure 6B). To further confirm the effect of BAP1 on apoptosis, cleavage of caspase-3 was assessed however, no evidence of significant cleavage was observed compared to control cells (data not shown). Our data imply that BAP1-mediated cell death displays properties of both apoptosis and necrosis.
To confirm that the effects of BAP1 on cell viability were not simply due to stress induced by antibiotic selection, we assessed whether BAP1 affects the growth of NCI-H226 cells in the absence of antibiotic selection. NCI-H226 cells were infected with control and wild-type BAP1-carrying lentiviruses so that almost 100% of the cells were infected. Total cell numbers were counted over time. We found that control cells doubled approximately every 72 hours, while WT-BAP1-expressing cells hardly grew (Figure 6C). The number of dead cells in the WT BAP1 sample increased in a linear fashion, implying that growth was counterbalanced by cell death and that the rate of cell death was constant throughout the experiment.
Previous evidence has implicated BAP1 as a tumor suppressor gene: the BAP1 gene is located on human chromosome 3 (3p21.3); deletions in 3p are detected in almost 100% of small-cell lung cancers (SCLC), renal cell carcinomas (RCC), over 90% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines and more than 80% of breast carcinomas (21). Our study shows, for the first time, that BAP1 exhibits another key characteristic of tumor suppressors, the ability to inhibit tumor growth in an animal model. This is not a trivial extension of the growth suppression studies. First, growth in soft agar is an incomplete model for tumorigenesis. Any number of factors provided in the milieu of the whole animal can affect tumor growth and the results we have presented make it clear that the growth properties observed in cell culture are mirrored in the whole animal. Second, since the cell population injected into the animals was not subject to selection by antibiotic, the strength of the effects seen is even more impressive. At the MOI used we anticipate virtually complete transfection of the cells with BAP1 expression vectors, but certainly a few cells will remain untransfected or express lower levels of BAP1 than the bulk pool of cells. The nearly complete suppression of tumor growth by wild-type BAP1 re-expression makes it clear that this is a powerful tumor suppressor. The partial effects of expressing catalytically dead BAP1, or the NLS mutants may be due to statistical variation (p values indicate the differences are not statistically significant) or a small dominant negative effect due to expression of the inactive or mislocalized protein.
Like BAP1, other deubiquitinating enzymes have recently been shown to be bona fide tumor suppressors, including the tumor-suppressor gene, CYLD (22) and the herpesvirus-associated ubiquitin-specific protease (HAUSP, or ubiquitin-specific protease 7) (23). The UPS is an integral part of normal cellular functions including cell cycle progression, signal transduction, response to extracellular stress and DNA repair and mutations that affect UPS components have been found to either enhance the effect of oncoproteins or reduce the function or amount of tumor suppressors (4).
Although BAP1 has been hypothesized to function in BRCA1-mediated processes (3), our results, and others’, support the possibility of BRCA1-independent functions of BAP1. First, Mallery et al., (10) have shown that BAP1 does not appear to function in the deubiquitination of the BRCA1/BARD1 complex. Secondly, we have shown that BAP1-mediated growth suppression is independent of wild-type BRCA1 (Figure 4D). Because there is no evidence that BRCA1 is a biologically relevant substrate for BAP1, we suspect that there are other in vivo targets of BAP1 deubiquitinating activity.
Deubiquitinating activity of BAP1 appears to be important in cancer pathogenesis. Missense mutations that abolish the deubiquitinating activity of BAP1 (A95D and G178V) have been identified in cancer cell lines (16). We have shown that these cancer-associated BAP1 mutants are not only defective in deubiquitinating activity (Figure 2B and Figure 2C) but are also defective in tumor suppressor activity (Figure 5), implying that DUB activity of BAP1 is important in cancer pathogenesis and further supporting BAP1 as a genuine tumor suppressor.
BAP1 is a nuclear localized DUB. Although two nuclear localization signals had previously been predicted (3), we have shown, for the first time, that BAP1 contains a functional classical NLS (Figure 3C) and that localization to the nucleus is required for BAP1-mediated tumor suppression (Figure 5). The NLS2 motif of BAP1 is a hydrophobic PY-NLSs which uses karyopherin β 2 as an import carrier (24). The identification of a functional classical NLS in BAP1 is consistent with BAP1 having a nuclear substrate and supports a mechanism whereby BAP1 must enter the nucleus and its deubiquitinating activity is involved in functions that lead to tumor suppression. These functions may include DNA damage repair, regulation of apoptosis and/or senescence or cell cycle regulation.
Several gene expression array studies have implicated BAP1 as a cell-cycle regulator (2527) and our preliminary studies support a role for BAP1 in cell-cycle regulation (Figure 6A). Our data also imply that BAP1-mediated tumor suppression results from an increase in cell death by apoptosis. (Figure 6B) However, other characteristics of apoptosis such as cleavage of caspase-3, a molecular marker of apoptosis were not observed. This may be related to the relatively small portion of the cell population that is undergoing cell death at any time. Most studies on apoptosis inflict catastrophic insult on the cells and all cells undergo a synchronized apoptosis where molecular markers are evident by 24 to 72 hours. In the experiments reported here, the presence of BAP1 is speeding the transition to S phase and some of those cells have accumulated some degree of DNA damage. Therefore, only a portion of these cells will undergo apoptosis at each division, leading to a low level of apoptotic markers detectable at any time. It is also prudent to note that expression of BAP1 increased the population of cells that stain positive for both AnnexinV and PI, an indication of late apoptosis and/or necrosis. More in-depth analysis of BAP1-mediated cell death is warranted in order to determine the specific mechanism of BAP1-mediated growth inhibition. For example, other studies have described cases of alternative (non-apoptotic) programs of cell death which also exhibit features characteristic of necrosis (28). We hypothesize that expression of BAP1 in NCI-H226 cells induces early exit out of G1, thereby bypassing the G1-S checkpoint and causing an accumulation of un-repaired DNA damage and eventual induction of cell death.
In summary, we have provided strong evidence that BAP1 fulfills three major criteria for a genuine tumor suppressor: i) it is mutated in cancer, ii) these cancer-associated mutations inactivate a key growth suppressive activity of the protein, and iii) restoration of the protein expression in mutant tumor cells antagonizes tumor growth. We have shown that BAP1 has a functional classical NLS and that deubiquitinating activity and nuclear localization are both required for its tumor suppressor activity. BAP1 acts as a cell-cycle regulator and this may be one of the mechanisms through which it carries out its tumor suppressor function. BAP1-mediated tumor suppression appears to be a complex sequence of events that may activate multiple pathways, thereby regulating the cell cycle in a manner that results in apoptosis, necrosis or both. The identification of the deubiquitinating enzyme BAP1 as a tumor suppressor may further our understanding of how the UPS functions in cancer development and/or progression as well as help identify potential new targets for anti-cancer drugs.
Acknowledgments
Grant support: National Institutes of Health (GM30308 to KDW; CA86335 and CA116804 to EGVM; 5K12GM000680 to KLF). We thank Sean R. Stowell Ph.D. for his assistance and useful discussions.
1. Chorostowska-Wynimko J, Szpechcinski A. The impact of genetic markers on the diagnosis of lung cancer: a current perspective. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2(11):1044–1051. [PubMed]
2. Boulton SJ. Cellular functions of the BRCA tumour-suppressor proteins. Biochem Soc Trans. 2006;34(Pt 5):633–645. [PubMed]
3. Jensen DE, Proctor M, Marquis ST, et al. BAP1: a novel ubiquitin hydrolase which binds to the BRCA1 RING finger and enhances BRCA1-mediated cell growth suppression. Oncogene. 1998;16(9):1097–1112. [PubMed]
4. Mani A, Gelmann EP. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and its role in cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(21):4776–4789. [PubMed]
5. Ohta T, Fukuda M. Ubiquitin and breast cancer. Oncogene. 2004;23(11):2079–2088. [PubMed]
6. Hershko A, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:425–479. [PubMed]
7. Wilkinson KD. Roles of ubiquitinylation in proteolysis and cellular regulation. Annu Rev Nutr. 1995;15:161–189. [PubMed]
8. Wilkinson KD. Regulation of ubiquitin-dependent processes by deubiquitinating enzymes. Faseb J. 1997;11(14):1245–1256. [PubMed]
9. Wilkinson KD. Ubiquitination and deubiquitination: targeting of proteins for degradation by the proteasome. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2000;11(3):141–148. [PubMed]
10. Mallery DL, Vandenberg CJ, Hiom K. Activation of the E3 ligase function of the BRCA1/BARD1 complex by polyubiquitin chains. Embo J. 2002;21(24):6755–6762. [PubMed]
11. Buchhagen DL, Qiu L, Etkind P. Homozygous deletion, rearrangement and hypermethylation implicate chromosome region 3p14.3-3p21.3 in sporadic breast-cancer development. Int J Cancer. 1994;57(4):473–479. [PubMed]
12. Yamane K, Chen J, Kinsella TJ. Both DNA topoisomerase II-binding protein 1 and BRCA1 regulate the G2-M cell cycle checkpoint. Cancer Res. 2003;63(12):3049–3053. [PubMed]
13. Russell NS, Wilkinson KD. Deubiquitinating enzyme purification, assay inhibitors, and characterization. Methods Mol Biol. 2005;301:207–219. [PubMed]
14. Sastry L, Johnson T, Hobson MJ, Smucker B, Cornetta K. Titering lentiviral vectors: comparison of DNA, RNA and marker expression methods. Gene Ther. 2002;9(17):1155–1162. [PubMed]
15. van Meir EG. Identification of nude mice in tumorigenicity assays. Int J Cancer. 1997;71(2):310. [PubMed]
16. Jensen DE, Rauscher FJ., 3rd Defining biochemical functions for the BRCA1 tumor suppressor protein: analysis of the BRCA1 binding protein BAP1. Cancer Lett. 1999;143 Suppl 1:S13–S17. [PubMed]
17. Scully R, Livingston DM. In search of the tumour-suppressor functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Nature. 2000;408(6811):429–432. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Yu X, Fu S, Lai M, Baer R, Chen J. BRCA1 ubiquitinates its phosphorylation-dependent binding partner CtIP. Genes Dev. 2006;20(13):1721–1726. [PubMed]
19. Scully R, Ganesan S, Vlasakova K, Chen J, Socolovsky M, Livingston DM. Genetic analysis of BRCA1 function in a defined tumor cell line. Mol Cell. 1999;4(6):1093–1099. [PubMed]
20. Putt KS, Chen GW, Pearson JM, et al. Small-molecule activation of procaspase-3 to caspase-3 as a personalized anticancer strategy. Nat Chem Biol. 2006;2(10):543–550. [PubMed]
21. Angeloni D. Molecular analysis of deletions in human chromosome 3p21 and the role of resident cancer genes in disease. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2007;6(1):19–39. [PubMed]
22. Massoumi R, Chmielarska K, Hennecke K, Pfeifer A, Fassler R. Cyld inhibits tumor cell proliferation by blocking Bcl-3-dependent NF-kappaB signaling. Cell. 2006;125(4):665–677. [PubMed]
23. Yang JM. Emerging roles of deubiquitinating enzymes in human cancer. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2007;28(9):1325–1330. [PubMed]
24. Lee BJ, Cansizoglu AE, Suel KE, Louis TH, Zhang Z, Chook YM. Rules for nuclear localization sequence recognition by karyopherin beta 2. Cell. 2006;126(3):543–558. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Kittler R, Pelletier L, Heninger AK, et al. Genome-scale RNAi profiling of cell division in human tissue culture cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2007 [PubMed]
26. Roh C, Tao Q, Lyle S. Dermal papilla-induced hair differentiation of adult epithelial stem cells from human skin. Physiol Genomics. 2004;19(2):207–217. [PubMed]
27. Roy D, Panda A, Calaf GM, Mitra A. Differential gene expression of sulindac-treated human breast epithelial cells. Int J Oncol. 2005;27(6):1727–1736. [PubMed]
28. Henriquez M, Armisen R, Stutzin A, Quest AF. Cell death by necrosis, a regulated way to go. Curr Mol Med. 2008;8(3):187–206. [PubMed]