Pattern of 5-HT2CR editing and expression in the rat brain
Our study confirmed previous observations that, although both rat and human brain express multiple variants of 5-HT
2CR mRNA, the rat brain exhibits less diversity of mRNA variants [reviewed in (
Werry et al., 2008)]. Indeed, compared with our recent 5-HT
2CR editing analysis in the human PFC (
Dracheva et al., 2008c), fewer mRNA variants, and accordingly fewer protein isoforms, were detected in rats than in humans despite that fact that we assessed more clones in the rat than in the human study (5136 and 4709 clones, respectively). Of 32 possible mRNA variants, 27 were detected in the rat compared to 30 in the human. Accordingly, of 24 possible protein isoforms, 19 were predicted in the rat while 22 were predicted in the human. The pattern of editing was also different between humans and rats. In humans,
ABCD is the most frequent mRNA variant in the whole brain (
Niswender et al., 1999;
Fitzgerald et al., 1999;
Wang et al., 2000) and in the PFC (
Dracheva et al., 2003;
Dracheva et al., 2008c). This variant is edited at 4 sites and encodes the fully edited (compared to INI) VSV protein isoform (see and ). In rats,
ABD was the most frequently expressed variant in all brain regions assessed in the present study. This variant is edited at 3 sites and encodes the VNV isoform. Similar data have been reported for the whole rat brain (
Burns et al., 1997;
Niswender et al., 1999) and for the neocortex and amygdala in mice (
Englander et al., 2005;
Hackler et al., 2006).
Two factors could contribute to species-specific variations in the repertoire of 5-HT
2CR editing. First are differences in editing templates: A-to-I RNA editing is dependent on double stranded (ds) RNA, and the efficiency of editing is determined by the secondary structure of RNA (
Valente and Nishikura, 2005). 5-HT
2CR region of editing forms a prerequisite double-stranded loop structure with the adjacent intron (
Burns et al., 1997). Although the sequences of DNA encoding the putative stemloops are highly conserved between humans and rats (~ 88% identity), the predicted secondary structures of these loops differ significantly between the species (
Werry et al., 2008), which may account for the observed variations in editing patterns. Second, the editing process
per se may differ between the species. For example, expression and/or activity of editing enzymes (ADAR1 and/or ADAR2) and expression of small nucleolar RNA or dsRNA helicase A (that were shown to influence 5-HT
2CR editing) (
Yang et al., 2004;
Vitali et al., 2005) may vary between humans and rats. The functional consequences of 5-HT
2CR editing differences between the species remain to be investigated.
Our study also confirmed the regional differences in 5-HT
2CR editing which were previously reported in human and rat (
Werry et al., 2008). To our knowledge, 5-HT
2CR editing status in the VTA and NuAc has never been investigated. No differences between the PFC and VTA were detected in the expression of the four most frequently observed mRNA variants (
ABD, ABCD, AB, ABC) or in the predicted protein isoforms (VNV, VSV, VNI, and VSI). However, the 5-HT
2CR was significantly more edited in the NuAc shell compared to both the PFC and the VTA. Specifically, an approximately 30% increase of the editing at D site as well as a modest increase at C site was observed in the NuAc shell compared to the PFC and VTA. Consequently, although the frequencies of the
ABD mRNA variant and the VNV isoform (encoded by
ABD) were only slightly increased,
ABCD and VSV (encoded by
ABCD) were ~ 60% higher in the NuAc shell compared to the other two regions, while the frequencies of the mRNA variants that are not edited at site D (
AB and
ABC) and, accordingly, the frequencies of the protein isoforms encoded by these variants (VNI and VSI, respectively) were ~60% lower in the NuAc shell.
The regional differences in 5-HT
2CR mRNA editing cannot be attributed to differences between the editing templates, as the sequence in the exon5-intron5 dsRNA stem-loop that is required for editing is identical in all regions of the rat brain. Thus, the higher 5-HT
2CR editing efficiency in the NuAc shell compared to the other regions could only result from regional differences in the editing process. Because the observed regional differences are largely determined by editing at D site, and because editing at this site is mostly catalyzed by ADAR2 (
Werry et al., 2008), the simplest explanation for these regional differences is higher expression and/or higher activity of ADAR2 in the NuAc shell compared to the PFC and VTA. Indeed, our findings demonstrate higher expression of ADAR2 in the NuAc shell compared to the VTA and PFC. As discussed above, four different ADAR2 transcripts have been described, and those can be categorized into two categories. The first two transcripts (ADAR2f) encode functional ADAR2 proteins. The other two transcripts (ADAR2nonf) are generated by alterative splicing due to the ADAR2 auto-editing and encode truncated non-functional protein isoforms. In line with a current view that auto-editing of ADAR2 regulates its endogenous level (
Feng et al., 2006), we detected a strong correlation between expression levels of ADAR2f and ADAR2nonf. Consequently, both types of ADAR2 transcripts showed increased expression in the NuAc shell compared to the VTA and PFC. In addition, although there were no correlations between ADAR2 expression and editing efficiencies at any site in any individual region, significant correlations were observed between ADAR2 (both ADAR2f and ADAR2nonf) and the editing at site D when the analysis was performed across all regions. This pattern suggests a direct association between ADAR2 transcript levels and the efficiency of editing at this site. ADAR2 expression levels were also significantly higher in the VTA compared to the PFC. In line with that, a small but significant increase of editing at site D was detected in the VTA compared to the PFC.
A number of studies have suggested that while editing at D site requires ADAR2, editing at A and B sites is totally dependent on ADAR1 [reviewed in (
Valente and Nishikura, 2005). Cross-talk between ADAR1 and ADAR2 activities has been observed, however, suggesting that relative expression of different ADARs may impact the editing efficiency at different sites (
Valente and Nishikura, 2005). No correlations between ADAR1 expression and editing at A or B sites were detected in our study, implying that the level of ADAR1 mRNA expression did not limit the efficiency of editing at these sites. On the contrary, a significant correlation was observed between ADAR1 and editing at D site. Because ADAR1 does not catalyze D site editing, this correlation does not likely represent a functional association, but rather reflects strong correlations between ADAR1 and ADAR2 that were observed in our study. We also detected that the ADAR2f/ADAR1 ratio was significantly higher in the NuAc compared to the PFC and VTA (which did not differ from each other). Because ADAR1 has previously been shown to inhibit ADAR2 activity (
Yang et al., 2004), the increased level of editing in the NuAc (mostly at site D) probably resulted not only from increased expression of ADAR2, but also from a higher ADAR2f/ADAR1 ratio in this region compared to PFC and VTA. These data clearly demonstrate that, as was suggested elsewhere (
Werry et al., 2008), both absolute and relative levels of different ADARs are important in determining the identity and variety of the expressed 5-HT
2CR variants in different regions (and probably in different cell populations) in the brain.
Our data also indicate that the expression of ADAR2 variants and/or the ADAR2/ADAR1 ratio are imperfect predictors of editing at site D. Indeed, the observed correlations, albeit highly statistically significant, were moderate in magnitude (r ~ 0.7), suggesting that editing efficiency is only partially controlled by the mRNA expression of ADARs in the brain. Thus, other factors may contribute to regional differences in 5-HT2CR editing. Because our regional dissections contained mixtures of different cell types, the functional association between ADAR2 and 5-HT2CR editing is complicated by their cellular heterogeneity. ADAR2 is ubiquitously expressed and its expression may differ between different cell types. 5-HT2CR expression, however, is restricted to specific cellular populations (see below).
Implications for 5-HT2CR modulation of the DAergic neurotransmission
An important aspect of this study was the potential relevance of 5-HT
2CR mRNA editing to DA neurotransmission. Recent
in vivo studies demonstrated that constitutive activity of 5-HT
2CRs exerts tonic inhibitory control on DA release in the NuAc (
De Deurwaerdere et al., 2004) underscoring the potential importance of ligand-independent 5-HT
2CR function in the modulation of reward circuitry (
Berg et al., 2008). Previous studies conducted
in vitro in transfected cells demonstrated that the unedited 5-HT
2CR possesses a significant degree of ligand-independent constitutive (or basal) activity, which is gradually diminished by editing (
Niswender et al., 1999). Our data suggest that relative to the VTA, 5-HT
2CR mRNA editing in the NuAc shell is enhanced and, therefore, favors the receptor population with attenuated constitutive activity. This pattern is, however, the opposite of that previously hypothesized based on studies involving the intracranial microinjection of 5-HT
2CR inverse agonists to the VTA and to the NuAc shell (
Navailles et al., 2006;
Navailles et al., 2008). Three considerations may reconcile our findings with these pharmacological data. First, 5-HT
2CR mRNA expression is approximately 3 times higher in the NuAc shell than in the VTA. Thus, despite the prevalence of the highly edited 5-HT
2CR isoforms in the NuAc shell, the overall constitutive activity may nevertheless be higher in the NuAc shell than in the VTA due to the absolute amount of less or unedited isoforms. Second, the 5-HT
2CR may be expressed by different cell types in the two regions. In the NuAc, 5-HT
2CR transcripts appear to localize primarily to medium-sized neurons that exhibit the distribution, localization, and morphology typical to striatal GABA efferent neurons (
Eberle-Wang et al., 1997). Thus, 5-HT
2CRs in the NuAc are likely to provide predominately negative feedback to the VTA DA neurons. Inhibition of constitutive 5-HT
2CR activity within the NuAc (by intracranial injection of an inverse agonist) would, therefore, increase DA release in this region (
Navailles et al., 2006). In the VTA, recent studies localized the 5-HT
2CR protein to both GABA and DA neurons (
Bubar and Cunningham, 2007). The 5-HT
2CR is excitatory (
Stanford et al., 2005). Thus, its modulatory influence on DA neuron firing in the VTA (and, consequently, DA release in the NuAc) would reflect the functional balance of its opposing actions on GABA and DA neurons. Intra-VTA administration of an inverse agonist might, therefore, have no effect on DA release in the NuAc (
Navailles et al., 2006). Third, recent work on mutant mice that solely express one of the two extreme editing isoforms of the receptor (INI or VGV) suggests that, as previously suggested by
in vitro studies (
Marion et al., 2004), the intracellular
vs. cell surface localization of the receptor may differ between isoforms such that the ultimate functional impact (including the level of constitutive activity) of the receptors could not be unambiguously predicted by the patterns of 5-HT
2CR editing alone (
Kawahara et al., 2008).
Region-specific differences in 5-HT2CR editing between HRs and LRs
Despite the lack of differences in the expression of both 5-HT2CR mRNA variants (5-HT2CRsp1 and 5-HT2CRsp2) between the behavioral phenotypes in the brain regions studied, 5-HT2CR editing efficiency was higher in HRs vs. LRs in the PFC. Functional activity decreases with editing, thus this finding would predict reduced 5-HT2CR function in the PFC of HRs that might be relevant for the individual differences in addiction vulnerability noted for this behavioral trait. The detected editing differences are consistent with the numerous accounts that central 5-HT2CR exerts a negative control on the psychomotor-stimulant and rewarding effects of various drugs of abuse (see above).
The mechanisms and circuitry underlying the differences in the cortical 5-HT
2CR editing between HR and LR phenotypes are not easily understood, however, based on the current literature. Locomotor activity is associated with an increase in DA release in the NuAc (
Dunnett and Robbins, 1992) and, compared to LRs, HRs have increased basal and stimulated DA levels in the NuAc (
Hooks et al., 1992;
Rouge-Pont et al., 1993). In the PFC, 5-HT
2CRs are primarily localized to GABA interneurons (
Liu et al., 2007) that are known to inhibit PFC glutamatergic pyramidal neurons that project to both the VTA and NuAc (
Sesack and Carr, 2002). In the VTA these glutamatergic cortical afferents synapse on GABA (but not DA) mesoaccumbens neurons (
Carr and Sesack, 2000). In the NuAc they also synapse on GABA neurons which, in turn, project to the VTA where they inhibit DA neurons (
Sesack and Pickel, 1992). Thus, by exciting the interposed GABA neurons it would be expected that the firing of the pyramidal PFC neurons would inhibit mesoaccumbens DA neurons. Consistent with the expected anatomical organization, several, but not all [ see (
Karreman and Moghaddam, 1996)], neurophysiological studies have shown that the firing of PFC glutamatergic neurons inhibits DA release in the NuAc (
Jackson et al., 2001). Unless countered by other modulatory influences, stimulation of 5-HT
2CRs in the PFC might, therefore, be expected to reduce glutamate output within the mesoaccumbens system leading to an increase of accumbal DA outflow. This increased DA release in the NuAc might then be expected to increase locomotion.
Our findings of enhanced editing (and presumably reduced function) of 5-HT
2CRs in the PFC of HRs
vs. LRs are at variance with the above speculation. Moreover, other studies that have evaluated the influence of PFC 5-HT
2CR function on the mesoaccumbens system have reported complex and seemingly contradictory results. Specifically, while an earlier study suggested that cortical 5-HT
2CRs exert negative control over behavioral responses induced by cocaine (
Filip and Cunningham, 2003), a recent study reported that those receptors enhance cocaine-evoked DA efflux in the NuAc (
Leggio et al., 2008).
These apparent contradictions might be explained by the influence of cortical 5-HT
2CRs on additional circuits that regulate accumbal DA release. Indeed, it is known that glutamatergic synapses of subcortical origin in the VTA significantly outnumber those of cortical origin (
Omelchenko and Sesack, 2007). Moreover, some of these glutamatergic afferents to the VTA originate from other regions including the hypothalamus, thalamus and brainstem, which themselves receive PFC glutamatergic input (
Sesack et al., 2003;
Pinto et al., 2003;
Geisler and Zahm, 2005;
Omelchenko and Sesack, 2007;
Geisler et al., 2007). Regulation of mesoaccumbens DAergic activity by the PFC may, therefore, involve polysynaptic glutamatergic inputs to the VTA from multiple sources. Thus, the control of the accumbal DA outflow by the PFC 5-HT
2CRs may involve a functional balance between GABA and glutamate mediated influences. More research is needed to clarify the mechanisms and circuitry underlying this interaction.
Individual variation in PFC 5-HT
2CR editing (and, therefore, function) is likely to influence liability to a variety of psychiatrically relevant phenomena including substance abuse. Early studies detected reduced tissue content of 5-HT and its metabolite (5-HIAA) in the PFC and NuAc of HRs compared to LRs (
Piazza et al., 1991). Lower cortical (but not accumbal) 5-HT was subsequently confirmed in HRs
vs. LRs in (
Thiel et al., 1999) suggesting decreased serotonergic function in the PFC of HRs. It is, therefore, tempting to speculate that the differences in the PFC 5-HT
2CR editing detected in the present study may stem from variations in the PFC 5-HT between the phenotypes. Interestingly, we recently detected increased 5-HT
2CR editing (manifested as increased frequency of the VSV isoform) in the PFC in suicide victims (
Dracheva et al., 2008c). This difference was specific to suicide and was not associated with the comorbid psychiatric diagnoses (bipolar disorder or schizophrenia), demographic characteristics (e.g. age, sex) or prescribed psychoactive medications. The 5-HT
2CR editing differences in suicide had been previously suggested in other reports (
Niswender et al., 2001;
Gurevich et al., 2002). Of note, numerous studies suggested decreased serotonergic function in the brain of suicide victims, including 5-HT-related abnormalities in the PFC (
Mann, 2003). Accordingly, the enhanced level of the fully edited VSV isoform in the PFC (which is the most frequent 5-HT
2CR isoform in the human and one of the four most frequent isoforms in the rat PFC) may be associated with vulnerability to drug addiction and suicide. There is in fact a high degree of correlation between these disorders, and drug addiction is considered a risk factor for suicidal behavior (
Arsenault-Lapierre et al., 2004). It is important to recognize, however, that the exact contribution of the PFC 5-HT
2CR editing to inter-individual vulnerability remains to be determined, since HRs differ from LRs not only in regard to reward sensitivity and goal-directed behavior (
Marinelli, 2005), but also in their ability to learn operant tasks (
Mitchell et al., 2005), as well as in their emotional reactivity (
Stead et al., 2006). Specifically, HRs show less anxiety in novel contexts than LRs, which appears to be consistent with the differences in neuroendocrine function and in regulation of the serotonergic system between the phenotypes (
Kabbaj et al., 2000;
White et al., 2007;
Mallo et al., 2008).
In summary, our study revealed distinct differences of 5-HT2CR mRNA expression and editing among brain regions that comprise key components of the mesocorticolimbic system that imply significant differences in functional activity (including the levels of constitutive activity) among 5-HT2CR neuronal populations within this circuitry. Moreover, the data indicate that these regional differences in editing may, at least in part, arise from the differences in expression levels of the editing enzyme, ADAR2. The discrete specificity of the 5-HT2CR editing disturbance observed within the mesocorticolimbic neuronal populations between the HR and LR behavioral phenotypes significantly implicate the PFC in the pathophysiology of drug abuse liability.