PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Am Chem Soc. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 September 2.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2734325
NIHMSID: NIHMS138397

CHEMICAL SENSING BASED ON CATALYTIC NANOMOTORS: MOTION-BASED DETECTION OF TRACE SILVER

Abstract

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms138397f3.jpg

A motion-based chemical sensing involving fuel-driven nanomotors is demonstrated. The new protocol relies on the use of an optical microscope for tracking changes in the speed of nanowire motors in the presence of the target analyte. Selective and sensitive measurements of trace silver ions are illustrated based on the dramatic and specific acceleration of bimetal nanowire motors in the presence of silver. Such nanomotor-based measurements would lead to a wide range of novel and powerful chemical and biological sensing protocols.

Considerable recent efforts have been devoted to the development of artificial nanomotors.1 In particular, fuel-driven bisegment Au-Pt nanowires exhibit autonomous self-propulsion due to electrocatalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide fuel.1,2 Such autonomous motion of catalytic nanowire motors holds great promise for exciting applications ranging from drug-delivery, nanoscale assembly and transport, or motion-based biosensing.1

This Communication reports on the first example of using catalytic nanomotors for motion-based chemical sensing, and particularly for specific detection of trace silver ions. During recent experiments in our laboratory involving electrochemically-triggered motion of catalytic nanowire motors3 we observed unusual speed acceleration associated with silver ions generated at a pseudo silver-wire reference electrode placed in the vicinity of the nanowire motors. Such unexpected specific silver effect upon the speed of catalytic nanomotors has been exploited in the present work for designing a new motion-based silver sensing protocol. The new protocol relies on the use of an optical microscope for tracking the speed of nanowire motors and offers highly selective, sensitive and simple measurements of trace silver based on direct visualization.

Figure 1A displays traces of Au-Pt nanomotors (over a 3 second period), taken from videos of the nanowires in the presence of eleven different cations (100 µM each), along with the peroxide fuel. Ten of these cations caused a significant speed reduction, including a Brownian motion or a slower non-Brownian motion (with speeds ranging from 0.3 to 7.1 µm s−1). Such slow speed (compared to a actual speed of ~10 µm s−1 observed without these salts) is consistent with the self-electrophoresis mechanism for the propulsion of catalytic nanomotors,4 where the speed decreases linearly with the solution conductivity.5 In contrast, the nanomotors move over a dramatically longer path in the presence of silver (shown in the middle), displaying an average speed of 52 µm s−1. Also shown in Figure 1 (B) is the histogram depicting the average speed of the nanomotors in the presence of the different cations tested. These data, along with the corresponding video (shown in the SI; Video 1), clearly illustrate the remarkably selective acceleration in the presence of silver. Adding other cations (e.g., Pb2+ or K+ up to 5 µM) had only slight reductions in the speed signal in the presence of the silver analyte. Apparently, the presence of a silver ion can greatly minimize the ionic-strength limitation of catalytic nanomotors. High speed of ~20 µm s−1 was maintained in the presence of 0.1 mM K+ (compared to a slow motion of 7 µm s−1 observed for K+ without the silver). Higher (>mM) salt concentrations, however, led to the expected conductivity-induced speed diminution.

Figure 1
Motion of Au-Pt catalytic nanomotors in a 5% H2O2 solution containing 11 common cations. (A) Image displaying 3-sec track lines for the movement of 5 randomly selected nanomotors in 11 different 100 µM metal-nitrate salt solutions (of K+, Pd2+ ...

The highly selective motion-based response is characterized also with a defined concentration dependence, with the speed (or distance) providing the quantitative information. Figure 2 (A–D) displays track lines of the catalytic nanomotors (over a 2 second period) obtained in the presence of different silver concentrations (0, 1, 10 and 100 µM; A–D). These traces indicate clearly that the nanomotors travel longer distances (ranging from 19–104 µm) upon increasing the silver concentration. Such paths correspond to speeds ranging from 9.6 µm s−1 (without silver) to 52 µm s−1 (at 100 µM silver). Also shown in Figure 2E is a calibration plot of the speed vs. silver concentration over the 10−9 to 10−4 M range. Such plot displays a defined concentration dependence over the 0.5 to 100 µM range, along with a negligible concentration effect at lower Ag(I) levels. The well-defined concentration dependence is clearly illustrated from the corresponding videos (shown in SI Video 2). Note that the behavior observed in Figure 2 is conflicting to what commonly expected upon increasing the salt concentration.5

Figure 2
Track lines of nanomotors illustrating the distances traveled by five Au-Pt nanowires in the presence of different Ag(I) concentrations: 0 (A), 1 (B), 10 (C) and 100 (D) µM, along with 5 wt% H2O2 fuel solution. (E) A calibration curve for Ag(I) ...

Several possible mechanisms have been considered to explain the unusual acceleration of Au-Pt nanomotors in the presence of silver ions. The most promising explanation relies on the underpotential deposition (UPD) of silver on the Au-Pt nanowires. With the addition of silver ions, these ions adsorb over the nanowire surface and are then reduced in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) measurements confirmed the presence of metallic silver over the Pt and Au segments of the nanowires (at 13 and 0.4 Ag atomic %, respectively), following a 0.5 hour exposure to the silver-nitrate/hydrogen-peroxide solution. A clear change of the color of the Pt segment was observed from analogous SEM experiments. No such compositional or color changes were observed in the presence of silver alone (without hydrogen peroxide). As will be illustrated below, a similar silver deposition was observed on platinum and gold nanorods. In addition, nanomotors exposed to a 100 µM Ag(I)/5% H2O2 solution for 0.5 and 24 hours, followed by an thorough wash with nanopure water, displayed high speeds of 20 and 35 µm s−1, respectively, in a fresh silver-free 5% H2O2 solution. These data confirm that the deposited Ag(0), rather than the dissolved Ag(I), is responsible for the accelerated motion. The possibility of depositing Ag(0) by UPD onto gold nanorods and platinum surfaces was discussed by several groups.6

Such silver deposition onto catalytic nanowires can lead to differences in the surface and catalytic properties (and hence to a faster the axial speed). Deposition of silver onto the Au segment increases the mixed potential difference (ΔE) between the anodic and cathodic segments, leading to an accelerated nanomotor motion in a manner similar to that reported recently for high-speed alloy nanomotors.7 Similarly, the silver deposition onto the Pt segment may make it a more catalytically active. The accelerated electrocatalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide was indicated also from the sharp decline of the motor speed following a 10 min exposure to the silver ion (compared to a longer ~30 min period observed without silver). The fast speed was then restored upon restoring the initial fuel level.

To isolate the role of the individual segments upon the speed acceleration, the motility of monocomponent Pt and Au nanorods was examined in the presence of silver nitrate. Surprisingly, monocomponent Pt rods displayed a dramatic acceleration from 3.5 to 22.6 µm s−1 in the presence of 10 µM silver ion (Video 3 SI). Monocomponent Au nanorods, in contrast, display a Brownian motion in the presence and absence of Ag(I). The EDX data of Figure 1 SI confirm the presence of silver on monocomponent Pt and Au nanowires, with Ag(0) values of up to 18 and 10 (Ag atomic %), respectively. Apparently, the Ag(0) deposition onto monocomponent platinum nanowires leads to the asymmetry (bimetal character) essential to induce the electrocatalytic propulsion. This is in agreement with a recent hydrogen-peroxide based fuel cell study where a Pt-Ag (anodecathode) combination exhibits the highest current density compared to other anode–cathode combinations, including Au-Ag one.8 Similarly, it was reported that Au-Ag bimetallic nanowire motors have a very slow speed of 6 µm s−1.4 The self-diffusiophoresis mechanism9 may also be considered for explaining the silver effect. Here, the deposition of silver over the nanomotors increases the localized gradient of reaction products around the nanomotors, leading to a diffusiophoretic movement of nanomotor.9 Such ionic gradient around the nanomotors results in a net electric field in solution that facilitates the increased speed.

In summary, we have described the first example of motion-based chemical sensing involving fuel-driven nanomotors. Effective measurements of trace Ag(I) have been accomplished based on the dramatic and specific acceleration of bimetal nanowire motors in the presence of this ion. While these initial data clearly demonstrate the utility of catalytic nanomotors for measuring micromolar concentrations of silver, additional work is required towards a better understanding of the unusual silver effect or the defined concentration dependence and for adapting the new concept for practical real-life applications. The presence of silver also facilitates the operation of catalytic nanomotors in conducting media that were not accessible earlier to catalytic nanomotors. While the new concept of motion-based sensing has been illustrated for trace measurements of Ag(I), we anticipate that it would lead to a wide range of novel sensing protocols. Current efforts in our laboratory examine new bioaffinity displacement assays based the ability of a target biomolecule to trigger the movement of an anchored nanomotor. We expect that such motion-based bioassays would lead to remarkable sensitivity, reflecting the ability to detect single-binding events.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

2_si_002

3_si_003

4_si_004

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by NSF (Award Number CHE 0840684) and NIH (Award RO1 EB002189). GUF thanks the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for a Heisenberg fellowship FL 384/7-1.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: Related protocols, instrumentation, reagents, additional data and videos. This material is available free of charge via the internet at http://pubs.acs.org

References

1. (a) Kline TR, Paxton WF, Mallouk TE, Sen A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005;44:744. [PubMed] (b) Wang J. ACS Nano. 2009;3:4. [PubMed] (c) Ozin GA, Manners I, Fournier-Bidoz S, Arsenault A. Adv. Mater. 2005;17:3011.
2. (a) Paxton WF, Sen A, Mallouk TE. Chem. Eur. J. 2005;11:6462. [PubMed] (b) Burdick J, Laocharoensuk R, Wheat PM, Posner JD, Wang J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:8164. [PubMed]
3. Calvo-Marzal P, Manesh KM, Kagan D, Balasubramanian S, Cardona M, Flechsig G-U, Posner J, Wang J. Chem Commun. 2009:4509. [PubMed]
4. Wang Y, Hernandez RM, Bartlett DJ, Bingham JM, Kline TR, Sen A, Mallouk TE. Langmuir. 2006;22:10451. [PubMed]
5. Paxton WF, Baker PT, Kline TR, Wang Y, Mallouk TE, Sen A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:14881. [PubMed]
6. (a) Mascaro LH, Santos MC, Machado SAS, Avaca LA. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1997;93:3999. (b) Orendorff CJ, Murphy CJ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006;110:3990. [PubMed] (c) Niidome Y, Nakamura Y, Honda K, Akiyama Y, Nishioka K, Kawasaki H, Nakashima N. Chem. Commun. 2009:1754. [PubMed]
7. Demirok UK, Laocharoensuk R, Manesh KM, Wang J. Angew. Chemie. Int. Ed. 2008;47:9349. [PubMed]
8. Yamazaki S, Siroma Z, Senoh H, Ioroi T, Fujiwara N, Yasuda K. J Power Sources. 2008;178:20.
9. (a) Ibele M, Mallouk TE, Sen A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:1. [PubMed] (b) Anderson J. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1989;21:61. (c) Howse JR, Jones RAL, Ryan AJ, Gough T, Vafabakhsh R, Golestanian R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;99:048102. [PubMed]