M. tuberculosis dnaAcos versus the E. coli dnaA conditional lethal mutants
DnaA, a member of AAA+ family ATPases, is a highly conserved protein in eubacteria (reviewed in (
Erzberger et al., 2002)), and is recognized to contain several functional domains that are implicated in oligomerization, association with DnaB, ATP, polar lipids and DNA (
Messer, 2002;
Schaper and Messer, 1997). The conditional lethal
M. tuberculosis dnaAcos mutants that we have isolated possesed mutations distributed in all these regions of the DnaA protein () and importantly, the affected residues are conserved in eubacteria (see
supplementary Figure S5).
While we obtained a single point mutation in the conserved box VII of the Walker type B ATPase motif, RELEGA (
Neuwald et al., 1999), we did not obtain a single point mutation in the ATP-binding and DNA-binding motifs (see , compare
dnaA231 with
dnaA108,
dnaA115,
dnaA132,
dnaA183 and
dnaA255). Failure to obtain a single point mutation in the ATP- or DNA-binding regions suggest that mutations in this region could result in a defective protein that renders the cell inviable and that mutations located in other regions may suppress this phenotype. For the sake of comparision, classic
E. coli dnaA mutants, including
dnaA46 and
dnaA5, that bear mutations in the ATP-binding pocket carry a secondary mutation elsewhere in the gene (
Hansen et al., 1992). An alternate possibility, although unlikely, is that our mutation search is not exhaustive.
The
M. tuberculosis dnaAcos mutants, unlike the
E. coli dnaA46 (ts), show a ‘delayed replication defect’ (slow stop) at the non-permissive temperature, but recover readily at the permissive temperature (
Abe and Tomizawa, 1971;
Evans et al., 1979). DNA synthesis in
dnaA46 strains can be aligned if cells are allowed to accumulate excess initiation potential at 42°C prior to returning to the permissive temperature.
E. coli dnaAcos is a spontaneous revertant of the
dnaA46 (ts) mutation, and carries two intragenic suppressor mutations (
Braun et al., 1987). This mutant shows excessive reinitiations (
Kellenberger-Gujer et al., 1978), presumably due to defective interactions with ATP (
Simmons and Kaguni, 2003). Our results suggest that the
M. tuberculosis dnaA115 and possibly other
dnaAcos mutants are comparable to the
E. coli reversible type of mutants, such as
dnaA46.
We showed that dnaA115 carries three mutations (). However, it is unknown which of these mutations is responsible for the observed phenotypes such as cold sensitivity, defective binding to ATP, and an ability to exhibit synchronous bursts of DNA synthesis at the permissive temperature following incubation at the non-permissive temperature. Evaluation of the contribution of these mutations individually and together in various combinations will provide valuable clues to the contribution of the amino acid residues to the replication initiation process in M. tuberculosis. Our future studies will address these important yet unresolved questions.
Synchronized DNA replication and initiation once-per-cell cycle
Results presented in this study reveal ( and ) several features associated with
oriC replication in
M. tuberculosis. First, initiation of DNA replication in
M. tuberculosis, as in
E. coli, requires
de novo DnaA synthesis. This claim is substantiated by our findings that the addition of rifampin enabled the completion of on-going rounds of DNA synthesis, but did not allow for the start of new rounds of DNA synthesis (
Fig. S2). Second, although
dnaA transcription and translation occur at both 37 and 30 °C, only DnaA competent to interact with ATP was found to be proficient for initiation ( and ). The inability of DnaA115 to bind ATP at 30°C explains why
dnaAcos is not proficient for the second-round of reinitiation at 30°C ().
Third, optimal cell cycle progression and viability require that the
dnaA promoter remains active during the entire cell cycle, with elevated activity during the C period and reduced activity immediately thereafter. The
dnaA gene in the
dnaAcos mutants is expected to duplicate just prior to the end of the C period. Thus, reduction in the
dnaA expression levels following
dnaA gene duplication, therefore at the end of the C period, could either be due to an autoregulation event or due to the sequestration of the
dnaA promoter (see below). Since
dnaAcos cells at the nonpermissive temperature are filamentous and possibly blocked at cell division (), we predict that elevated
dnaA expression during the C period provides the necessary pools of active DnaA required for regulated transcription of genes involved in cell division and other processes. This is not an unreasonable assumption since the transcriptional regulatory role for DnaA has been well recognized (
Messer and Weigel, 1997).
M. tuberculosis DnaA, like its
E. coli counterpart, recognizes and binds to DnaA-boxes (
Dziadek et al., 2002;
Madiraju et al., 2006). Our bioinformatics analysis identified the DnaA-box like sequences in the putative promoters of genes involved in cell division and other metabolic pathways such as lipid biosynthesis and nucleotide biosynthesis (not shown). Presumably, the interactions of DnaA with the target promoter sequences results in the temporal expression of genes involved in septation and cell cycle progression. These results substantiate our earlier report showing that overproduction or conditional depletion of DnaA in
M. smegmatis produces filamentous cells blocked at cell division (
Greendyke et al., 2002).
Finally, the nucleotide (ATP) bound state of DnaA is important for cell cycle progression and the initiation of DNA synthesis. This is because even though transcription and translation of
M. tuberculosis dnaA115 proceed at 37 and 30°C, new rounds of DNA synthesis were observed only at 37°C.
M. tuberculosis DnaA binds ATP and ADP with relatively high affinity (
Yamamoto et al., 2002a;
Yamamoto et al., 2002b), but only DnaA protein competent to bind and hydrolyze ATP promotes the rapid oligomerization required for the initiation of replication at
oriC (
Madiraju et al., 2006). Since DnaA115 protein is defective for binding to ATP at 30°C (), this could explain why the
dnaA115 strain failed to reinitiate DNA synthesis at the non-permissive temperature ().
The observed 10h C period in synchronized population of
M. tuberculosis is longer than we expected, but is consistent with an earlier report describing the DNA synthesis time in
M. tuberculosis (
Hiriyanna and Ramakrishnan, 1986). The C period in
E. coli is also long when grown in chemostats and in media containing succinate as opposed to glucose, although the reasons for this are unknown (
Bipatnath et al., 1998). The long C period in
M. tuberculosis with a
tD=24h is not due to the presence of single
rrn operon in its genome because
M. marinum with
tD=3h has also one
rrn operon (
Helguera-Repetto et al., 2004). It is possible that DnaA could regulate the intracellular levels of nucleotide pools, hence the overall rate of DNA synthesis. Alternatively, lagging strand DNA synthesis could be slow in
M. tuberculosis. Clearly, further studies are required to understand this issue. It is pertinent to note that the slow growth rate of
M. tuberculosis is also correlated to the presence of large number of insertion sequences in its genome (
Cox, 2004).
The
M. tuberculosis dnaA promoter contains several DnaA-box like sequences (
Qin et al., 1999). The binding of DnaA to these DnaA boxes immediately after gene duplication could lead to regulated expression of
dnaA, similar to the reported autoregulatory activity of
E. coli DnaA (
Braun et al., 1985). We have recently shown that the MtrA response regulator promotes
dnaA transcription by binding to the
dnaA promoter in a phosphorylation-dependent manner (
Fol et al., 2006). Thus, another possibility is that intracellular ratio of the phosphorylated to the non-phosphorylated MtrA response regulators dictates the outcome of
dnaA expression. A consequence would be the regulation of
dnaA expression.
DNA synthesis under synchronized replication conditions reveal that hyper-initiation following reinitiation does not occur in
M. tuberculosis (). This raises the question as to how ‘initiation once-per-cell cycle’ is achieved in this organism. Studies with
E. coli reveal that DnaA mediated
oriC replication is initiated when a threshold level of DnaA within a cell is reached (
Lobner-Olesen et al., 1989;
Skarstad et al., 1986;
Skarstad et al., 1989), and that a sequestration of both the
dnaA promoter and the
oriC regions are required for achieving the controlled once-per-cell-cycle initiation [reviewed in (
Riber and Lobner-Olesen, 2005)].
The
M. tuberculosis oriC does not contain GATC methylation sequences and the genome does not encode for the SeqA-like protein. Our earlier data show that the active species for initiating replication at
oriC is the DnaA protein that is capable of binding and hydrolyzing ATP (
Madiraju et al., 2006). Hence, in order to explain how
oriC initiation in
M. tuberculosis is regulated, we propose that DnaA-box like sequences present in the promoters of several genes including the
dnaA gene provide a sink for DnaA-ATP pools remaining after initiation thereby minimizing the active DnaA threshold available for reinitiation. We have recently shown that the intrinsic ATPase activity of DnaA promotes rapid oligomerization of DnaA-ATP complexes on
oriC (
Madiraju et al., 2006). This process may result in the conversion of DnaA-ATP complexes to DnaA-ADP complexes (
Madiraju et al., 2006). Thus, another possibility is that a tight association of DnaA-ADP complexes with
oriC following its rapid oligomerization prevents the reinitiation from
oriC (
Madiraju et al., 2006). This situation may be analogous to that of the RIDA mechanism (
Katayama et al., 1998).
M. tuberculosis DnaA is membrane associated (
Yamamoto et al., 2008) and acidic phospholipids promote dissociation of nucleotides from DnaA and possibly restore levels of active DnaA (
Yamamoto et al., 2002a;
Yamamoto et al., 2008). Finally, in addition to DnaA, other hitherto unidentified regulatory proteins may target both the
dnaA promoter and the
oriC in order to regulate hyper-initiation. One such regulator could be MtrA (
Fol et al., 2006). Further characterization of
dnaAcos mutants could provide valuable insights into the regulation of
oriC replication process in
M. tuberculosis.
Finally, investigations in DNA replication regulation and cell cycle progression in
M. tuberculosis remain relatively unexplored as compared to those in other organisms. Larry Wayne developed a hypoxia-based culture system where actively growing
M. tuberculosis are subject to a gradual hypoxic state over a period of two to three weeks in sealed, air-tight tubes in order to convert the population to a non-replicative persistent state. Hypoxic
M. tuberculosis cells are shown to catalyze synchronous replication upon resuspension of cultures in fresh oxygenated media (
Wayne, 1977;
Wayne and Hayes, 1996). These are time consuming experiments, and the status of the
dnaA promoter activity following reactivation and cell cycle progression have not been investigated. The simple growth temperature shifts for aligning DNA synthesis with the
dnaA mutants that we generated should prove useful in investigating the regulatory mechanisms involved in
M. tuberculosis DNA replication and cell cycle.