PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of canjcardiolThe Canadian Journal of Cardiology HomepageSubscription pageSubmissions Pagewww.pulsus.comThe Canadian Journal of Cardiology
 
Can J Cardiol. 2009 August; 25(8): 453.
PMCID: PMC2732372

Letter to the Editor

Tisha Joy, MD FRCPC and Robert A Hegele, MD FRCPC FACP

To the Editor:

Alternate day dosing of rosuvastatin: Potential usefulness in statin-intolerant patients

We commend Dulay et al (1) for their well-designed crossover trial of the efficacy of 20 mg alternate day versus 10 mg daily dosing of rosuvastatin on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering. In particular, they noted a 48.5% versus 40.9% LDL-C reduction with daily versus alternate day rosuvastatin dosing, respectively. Despite the additional absolute LDL-C reduction of 7.6% with the daily dosing regimen, Dulay et al (1) stated the alternate day regimen was associated with a minimum 37.5% cost savings compared with daily dosing. Thus, a primary conclusion of their study was that alternate day dosing may represent an affordable yet efficacious approach for financially constrained individuals.

Another important barrier to statin adherence is tolerability. Myopathy, ranging from common myalgias to rare but life-threatening rhabdomyolysis, represents an important cause of statin discontinuation in clinical practice. Although the incidence of statin myopathy is low (approximately 1.5% to 5.0%) in randomized clinical trials (2,3), several observational studies (4,5) have demonstrated higher incidences of approximately 5% to 10%.

Both atorvastatin and rosuvastatin have relatively long plasma half-lives (6), making them potential candidates for consideration of alternate day dosing regimens, with the possible further benefit of reduced exposure to side effects. Although not specifically tested in statin-intolerant patients, a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 35 patients taking 10 mg atorvastatin daily versus 10 mg atorvastatin on alternate days showed LDL-C reductions of 38% and 35%, respectively, with no development of adverse symptoms (7). A retrospective analysis of our own patients (n=7) treated with 5 mg or 10 mg alternate day dosing of rosuvastatin revealed an LDL-C reduction of 25.9% and 37.9%, respectively (unpublished observations). In 51 previously statin-intolerant patients, alternate day dosing of rosuvastatin at 5 mg or 10 mg (mean 5.6 mg/day) resulted in a mean LDL-C reduction of 34.5% after a mean of 4.6 months. Importantly, 80% of patients had no recurrence of their myalgias (8). Even once to three times weekly rosuvastatin dosing regimens have demonstrated LDL-C reductions ranging from 20% to 38% among individuals with previous statin intolerance (9,10). Among our own patients on a three times weekly regimen of either 5 mg or 10 mg of rosuvastatin (n=6, mean dose 22.5 mg/week), an LDL-C reduction of 27.6% was achieved (unpublished observations). Thus, alternate day dosing regimens of rosuvastatin may be a practical alternative based on cost considerations but also due to tolerability, particularly among individuals with previous statin intolerance. However, the efficacy of alternating day statin regimens on cardiovascular disease outcomes remains to be evaluated.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the Jacob J Wolfe Distinguished Medical Research Chair, the Edith Schulich Vinet Canada Research Chair (Tier I) in Human Genetics, a Career Investigator award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario (CI-5710), and operating grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-13430, MOP-39533, MOP-39833), the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario (PRG-5967, NA-6059, T-6018), the Ontario Research Fund, and by Genome Canada through the Ontario Genomics Institute.

Editor’s Note

Editor’s Note

This letter was forwarded to the authors of the paper in question but no response was received.

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Dr RA Hegele (Advisory Boards and Speakers Bureaus: Pfizer, Merck Frosst, Schering, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Solvay and Kowa). Dr T Joy (Speakers Bureaus: Merck Frosst, Schering).

REFERENCES

1. Dulay D, LaHaye SA, Lahey KA, Day AG. Efficacy of alternate day versus daily dosing of rosuvastatin. Can J Cardiol. 2009;25:e28–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Bays H. Statin safety: An overview and assessment of the data – 2005. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:6C–26C. [PubMed]
3. Law M, Rudnicka AR. Statin safety: A systematic review. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:52C–60C. [PubMed]
4. Bruckert E, Hayem G, Dejager S, Yau C, Begaud B. Mild to moderate muscular symptoms with high-dosage statin therapy in hyperlipidemic patients – the PRIMO study. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2005;19:403–14. [PubMed]
5. Nichols GA, Koro CE. Does statin therapy initiation increase the risk for myopathy? An observational study of 32,225 diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Clin Ther. 2007;29:1761–70. [PubMed]
6. Baker SK, Samjoo IA. A neuromuscular approach to statin-related myotoxicity. Can J Neurol Sci. 2008;35:8–21. [PubMed]
7. Matalka MS, Ravnan MC, Deedwania PC. Is alternate daily dose of atorvastatin effective in treating patients with hyperlipidemia? The Alternate Day Versus Daily Dosing of Atorvastatin Study (ADDAS) Am Heart J. 2002;144:674–7. [PubMed]
8. Backes JM, Venero CV, Gibson CA, et al. Effectiveness and tolerability of every-other-day rosuvastatin dosing in patients with prior statin intolerance. Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42:341–6. [PubMed]
9. Mackie BD, Satija S, Nell C, Miller J, III, Sperling LS. Monday, Wednesday, and Friday dosing of rosuvastatin in patients previously intolerant to statin therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:291. [PubMed]
10. Backes JM, Moriarty PM, Ruisinger JF, Gibson CA. Effects of once weekly rosuvastatin among patients with a prior statin intolerance. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:554–5. [PubMed]

Articles from The Canadian Journal of Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Pulsus Group