PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Semin Nucl Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 July 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2731478
NIHMSID: NIHMS123348

Genomic Biomarkers for Molecular Imaging

Predicting the future

Abstract

Over the past few decades great strides have been made in anatomical imaging of disease that has lead to their diagnosis with minimal invasion. Despite these advances, disease like cancer continues to take one human life every minute in the USA alone. Complimentary approaches that pertain directly to the genesis of the disease might contribute to its early diagnosis and subsequent management. In cancer, an array of molecular abnormalities leading to the modulations in expression of key proteins important in the cellular signaling pathways and cell proliferation has been identified. These specific disease fingerprints, biomarkers, are over expressed on malignant cell surfaces or within the cytoplasm and provide unique targets and promise to improve cancer diagnosis and therapy.

We, among others, have designed, synthesized, and evaluated some novel probes specific for those oncogenes and oncogene product biomarkers for PET and SPECT molecular imaging of certain types of cancers.

This article briefly describes this approach and gives specific examples which depict the ability of molecular imaging to detect occult lesions not detectable by current scintigraphic approaches. The article also outlines a few examples predicting other possible applications of targeting such specific probes not yet utilized.

“Our nation always has been about the urge to dream and the will to accomplish them” N. Tyson.

A. Introduction

The theme of this issue of the seminars in Nuclear Medicine is “The hybrid imaging.” PET/CT, SPECT/CT, PET/MRI continue to contribute to daily health care issues and play a pivotal role in molecular imaging. Often, these tools provide physicians with excellent anatomic information; however, they fail to detect the subtle molecular changes that signal the imminent onset of serious illnesses. One of the most challenging and formidable illness of these is cancer. In 2006, 11 million new cases of cancer were diagnosed and 7.6 million deaths were attributed to cancer worldwide (1). In the USA alone, in the same year, 1.4 million new cases and 565,000 deaths were reported (2). This death toll is equal to more than one every minute of a day, through a year, every year.

Over the years great strides have been made to combat cancer. These have been able to prolong survival, but more often than not, at the expense of poor quality of life. If cancer is detected early, it can be treated effectively and the life of those victimized by it could be extended with quality.

How can cancer be detected early and accurately by those imaging tools? Cancer is a disease of the cell. Life begins with a single cell and it multiplies into an estimated 75 trillion cells by adulthood. In order to sustain life, cells go through enormously complex chemistry all the time through out their life. Advances in genomics and proteomics unravel that complexity everyday and shed new light on many parameters that adversely influence the cell phenotype and genotype. One of the tasks they must perform is to deal effectively with many forms of different stress, toxins and carcinogens they encounter on a daily basis. Researchers believe that while encountering such constant threats, cells, suffer serious modulations in their chemical network. This leads to DNA damages that create chaotic chemical processes and initiate abnormal genomic and molecular pathways into the cell nucleus, cytoplasm, and their surface. In turn, these processes promote rapid and uncontrolled cell proliferation and are responsible for more than 80% of cancers. Molecular biologists have carefully identified these products, the biomarkers, as fingerprints that are specific and characteristic of a given cancer. Estrogen positive breast cancer, for example, more predominantly expresses CCND1, and estrogen negative cancer, the HER2 proto-oncogene (3.4). More than 100 such specific oncogenes have been identified for various cancer types. CCND1 encodes cyclin D1 protein and the HER2 oncogene which is also known as ERBB2/neu, Her2 (5).

One of the primary goals in cancer research during the molecular biology era remains to better understand the genetic basis of cancer and to explain its proliferative nature. Such investigations in years to come will unfold the deeper basis of oncogenesis and will continue to provide a greater array of biomolecules of cancer subsets. More importantly, these biomarkers make themselves available for targeting significantly sooner than the characteristic phenotypic changes that the cell undergoes later. Today, the histologic confirmation of cell morphology serves as a gold standard for cancer diagnosis. Unfortunately, by this time, the cancer is fully blown and even metastasized.

This article will briefly describe how investigators in academia and industry, in the near future can harness the power of this knowledge of specific biomarkers, for early diagnosis of cancer, its stratification for treatment and to monitor the effectiveness of that treatment, all noninvasively.

Instead of blasting tumors with radiation, chemical agents or surgical excision, all of which destroy plenty of healthy tissue along with tumors, the future drugs will interface only with the molecular or genetic processes that initiate development cancer said Paul Workman; Director of the CRC center for cancer therapies at the Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom. (6).

Some scholarly approaches on molecular level, such as treating the cancer with angiogenesis inhibitors (7), starving the cancer with anti-VGEF molecules (8) and to track metastatic lesions using microarray chips (9) have placed diagnostic and therapeutic modalities at major crossroads. However, relatively little has yet been done to explore the use of this knowledge in the management of this formidable disease using scintigraphic/molecular imaging.

B. Diagnostic Applications

B1. Mutant, Surface Biomarkers

Using the biomarkers overexpressed on malignant cell surface, we have made some progress in diagnosis and therapy. Examples of these are illustrated in Table I.

Table 1
Mutant Cell Surface Receptors as Targets

The most familiar of these are the somatostatin receptors targeted with a variety of specific peptide analogues labeled with In-111 for planar or SPECT (single photo emission tomography) (10), with Ga-68 for PET (position emission tomography) (11), and with Lu-177 or Y-90 for therapeutic applications (12/13).

More ubiquitously, over expressed mutant malignant cell surface receptors of these are VPAC receptors. Designated as VPAC1, VPAC2, and PAC1, these receptors have been targeted with analogues of two primary peptides labeled either with Tc-99m for planar or SPECT imaging (14-19). First, VIP, a 28 amino acid, peptide, isolated from porcine intestine (16). VIP has three Lysine (Lys) residues (at positions 15, 20, and 21), two tyrosine (Tyr) residues (at positions 10 and 22), two Arginine (Arg) residues (at position 12 and 14), and an essential histidine (His) residue at the N terminus and (Asn) amidated C-terminus. All 28 amino acids are required for full biologic activity of VIP (17). Second, Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase Activating Polypeptide (PACAP). This 38-amino acid peptide was isolated from bovine hypothalamus (18). PACAP was found to stimulate accumulation of intracellular and extracellular cAMP in rat anterior pituitary cells (20). Like VIP28, PACAP27 also has an amidated (leu) C-terminal and His at the N-terminal. The biological actions of VIP and PACAP are mediated by a family of three G protein-coupled receptors, which are designated as VPAC1, VPAC2 and PAC1 (21-24). These gene receptors are located on the plasma membrane of tumor cells (25). Among the tumors on which VPAC1 receptors have been found in high density and high incidence, include cancers of breast, prostate and urinary bladder (100%), colon (96%), pancreas (65%), lung (58%), stomach (54%), and liver (49%) (26-28). We labeled VIP28 and PACAP27 with Tc-99m (t1/2 6 h, γ=140 keV, 94%) which required modification of the peptide to covalently accommodate a group of additional amino acids to chelate Tc-99m (29-30). The use of 99mTc analogues allowed efficient imaging of human breast cancer (15-19). We also labeled VIP analogues with Cu-64, a 12.7 hr half-lived positron emitting radionuclide. All breast tumors we examined, expressed VPAC receptors in high density (> 105 receptors/cell) (Fig. 1) and had several fold greater radioactivity uptake (Fig. 2) than the adjacent ‘normal” tissue. At least in four patients, out of sixteen, with abnormal mammography, and one patient with an occult lesion in the neck, possibly secondary to childhood glioblastoma, that were not detectable by Tc-99m sestaMIBI were imaged with Tc-99m VIP. Examples are given in Fig. Fig.33 and and4.4. All expressed VPAC1 receptors in high density. With the hypothesis that the better spatial resolution of PET will permit us to detect smaller lesions at an early stage with high sensitivity and specificity, the peptides were labeled with Cu-64. These analogues not only detected subcutaneously implanted human breast tumor in a athymic nude mice (Fig. 5) but also spontaneously grown mammary tumors, that were not detectable with F-18-FDG (F-18-flueorodeoxyglucose) in MMTV/nue (Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus) (Fig. 6). Similarly, spontaneous PIN IV, but not PIN II, hyperplasia of the prostate in TRAMP (Transgenic Adenocarcinoma of Mouse Prostate) mouse was correctly detectable by this technique but not by F-18-FDG (15) (Fig. 7). It is important to note that 85% of men with PIN-IV hyperplasia develop fully blown prostate cancer within 6 months and the remaining 15% within a few months there after (31/32).

Fig. 1
VPAC1 protein levels in human breast tumor tissues were determined by Western blotting. Lane 9 represents the level of its expression in adjacent normal breast tissue of one patient. All patients (lanes 1-8) had abnormal Tc-99m-VIP analog scan.
Fig. 2
Ten μm thick sections of human breast tumor tissues and adjacent “normal” tissues were exposed to Cu-64-TP4200 (a VIP analog) and digital autoradiography was performed. The average Cu-64 uptake in tumors was 5.7 times greater than ...
Fig. 3
A 20-year-old woman with a history of neurofibroma of the, brain in childhood presented with mass in left neck that was evident for one month.. Tc-99m MIBI scan (center) was negative. Bone scan (right) showed faint blood pool. However, Tc-99m VIP scan ...
Fig. 4
A 52-year-old woman had left breast mastectomy and silicon implant. Five years later, she was presented with a palpable mass (also by mammography) of the right breast. Tc-99m MIBI scans (lower panel) was normal. The tumor was detectable by Tc-99m-VIP ...
Fig. 5
MCF7 human breast cancer tumors were grown in the right thigh of several immuno suppressed, athymic nude mice. Tumors were clearly visualized by PET imaging at 4hr and 24hr post administration of three biologically active analogs of VIP, labeled with ...
Fig. 6
Spontaneously grown, non-palpable breast tumors in a MMTV/neu mouse were clearly detectable (A and B, arrows) by PET scanning with Cu-64 TP3805 (VIP analog) but not with F-18-FDG. RT-PCR performed using the excised tumor tissues demonstrated extensive ...
Fig. 7
Transaxial PET images of two separate TRAMP mice with prostate cancer, (PIN II, upper panel and PIN IV lower panel.) Images were obtained with F-18-FDG (vertical panel no.2) and Cu-64 TP3939 (vertical panel no.3), a biologically active VIP analog. PIN ...

Spontaneously grown tumors in transgenic MMTV mice over express CCND1 oncogene or TRAMP mice over express CCND1 oncogene (see later) and VPAC1 receptors. Depicted by just a few examples, the notion that tumors can be imaged at an early stage with high specifity by targeting specific oncogene products expressed on malignant cells at the onset of oncogenesis, provides great possibilities and high significance for the enormous opportunities targeting of these biomarkers provide.

B.2. Intracellular Biomarkers

Since their discoveries 25 years ago, more than 100 oncogenes and more than 30 tumor suppressor genes have been identified. It has become increasingly apparent that oncogene expression in individual cells deviates substantially than their normal cohorts. Data are too extensive and are beyond the scope of this article. However, these data provide us with an array of novel biomarkers. A few of these biomarkers that can be targeted with specific probes for early detection of certain cancers are listed in Table 2 (33). Targeting mRNA copies in dividing cells in living animals is exciting as well as challenging.

Table 2
Examples of some oncogenes expressed predominantly on certain tumors

Nevertheless, we among a few others, have designed, synthesized and evaluated Tc-99m and Cu-64 labeled specific probes that target specific oncogene mRNAs for SPECT or PET imaging of breast, pancreatic and colorectal cancers (34-42). Our probes consist of a short 12 mer peptide nucleic acid (PNA) to which is attached tetramer cyclic peptide (Cys-Ser-Lys-Cys-CONH2) specific for IGFR-1 receptors at one end a chelating agent such as DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N1,-N11, N111, N1111-tetraacetic acid) at the other, for strong chelation of a radionuclide. The hypothesis is that the tetrapeptide will provide a specific IGFR1 receptor binding, facilitate internalization of the radiolabeled PNA probe, and hybridize with the ample copies of the oncogene mRNA. It is estimated that more than 106 IGFR1 receptors are expressed on certain human breast cancer cells, as compared only to a few on normal cells. This provides high specificity for the probe to bind and internalize in malignant cells (34-42). Similarly, approximately 6 × 103 cyclinD1 mRNA copies are expressed per MCF7 human breast cancer cell that provide up to 1012 targets per gram of a tumor. Mismatch PNAs were also synthesized to serve as controls. Such constructs, labeled with Cu-64, enabled us to image experimental human breast cancer (Fig 8), and experimental pancreatic cancer (Fig 9) grown in athymic nude mice. The probe also allowed us to image a non palpable, spontaneous breast tumor in MMTV mice (Fig 10) that was not detected with F-18-FDG (43). These examples render a wide scope of applications in humans for detection of cancer at an early stage, leading to better management of this disease.

Fig. 8
At 4 hr and 24hr, PET images targeting CCND1 mRNA on MCF-7 human breast cancer grown in athymic nude mice. At both times, points tumor was detectable with specific Cu-64 antisense PNA WT4348 but not so clearly either with mismatch PNAs WT4273, or with ...
Fig. 9
KRAS oncogene mRNA was targeted in human pancreatic cancer grown in athymic nude mice. Cu-64 labeled specific antisense PNA WT4286 and several mismatch PNAs were used. Tumors (arrow) were clearly detectable by PET imaging with Cu-64-WT 4286 and a single ...
Fig. 10
Spontaneously grown breast tumors in MMTV mice over express CCND1 oncogene mRNA. Tumors (arrow) were detectable by PET imaging with Cu-64 labeled CCND1 specific probe. (These tumors were not imaged with F-18-FDG).

C. Therapeutic Applications

Since cancer is the molecular process of genomic deregulation, the current therapeutic approaches have been designed to block the division of cells. However, these approaches do not discriminate between healthy and abnormal cells and lead to serious consequences that degrade the quality of patient life. One approach to provide better cell specificity will be to apply antisense technology as described below.

C.1. Background and Hypothesis for antisense Technology

Antisense technology has emerged as an exciting approach for cancer therapy. The approach is based upon the sequence specific binding of an antisense oligonculeotide to target RNA, preventing the oncogene mRNA translation. The specificity of hybridization by Watson-Crick base pairing makes antisense oligonculeotides an attractive therapeutic tool as to selectively modulate the expression of oncogenes involved in the pathogenesis of malignancies. In principle, this approach is also versatile as a variety of oncogenes are known to be overexpressed in different cancers, but not in normal cells.

As a result, a number of clinical trials have been initiated, the first of which being in 1996 (44-48). However, they have been met with some challenges. Three prominent of these are in vivo stability, sequence length, and poor uptake in malignant cells. In all clinical trials, antisense oligonculeotides were injected systemically when their in vivo stability was unknown or questionable.

In our approach, there are 4 important differences. First, we use PNA, which is resistant to nuclease attack. Second, we use a short, 12mer nucleotide sequence for optimum selectivity. Third, we use PNAs to which are covalently attached a cyclic tetrapeptide specific for receptor-mediated endocytosis by IGF1R. These growth factor receptors are overexpressed on the surface of many malignant cells including those of the breast and the prostate. The receptor ligand provides the PNA chimera with the specificity for the malignant cells. Fourth, for our therapy, we inject the PNA chimeras directly into the tumor. Intratumoral injection helps minimize the loss of PNA to the blood and other organs, as opposed to intravenous administration. The intratumoral approach is practically feasible under ultrasound guidance in localized, solid cancers, such as those of the prostate, breast, liver, and lungs. Furthermore, the PNA chimera is not expected to interact significantly with normal cells as these cells may not overexpress IGF1R. Therefore, once injected they are expected to be highly specific for the malignancy, but not for normal tissue.

We therefore hypothesize that intratumoral administration of a PNA chimera, specific for an oncogene mRNA overexpressed in tumor cells, will down regulate the oncogene mRNA and arrest the growth of the cancer.

C.2. Intratumor Injections of WT4186 PNA specific for CCND1

In three groups of 4 athymic nude mice, MCF7 human breast cancers were grown to approximately 5 mm in diameter. One group of mice received 2 μg of non-radioactive WT4186 PNA specific for cyclin D1, the oncogene mRNA overexpressed in MCF-7 tumors. Injections were made in 100 μL of normal saline. The mice in the other two groups each received 2 μg of mismatch controls, namely WT4171 or WTF4113. Twenty-four hours later, animals were sacrificed, tumors excised, RNA extracted, and cyclin D1 protein levels were determined by Western blot (Fig. 11 (41)).

Fig.11
Western blots of 100 μg of protein extracted from MCF7:IGF1R estrogen receptor-positive breast tumor cell xenografts at 24h after direct injection of the PNA mismatch chimera, WT4172, the peptide mismatch chimera, WT4113, and the PNA antisense ...

Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA analysis determined that the 3 groups were different (P=0.0308). When each group was compared against another, the Dunn multiple-comparison method determined that the PNA mismatch chimera, WT4172, and the PNA antisense chimera, WT4185, groups were different (P=0.02). The peptide mismatch chimera, WT4113, and the PNA antisense chimera, WT4185, groups were different (P=0.04). The PNA mismatch chimera, WT4173, and the peptide mismatch chimera, WT4113, groups, however, were not different (P=0.39). The PNA antisense chimera, WT4185, significantly reduced cyclin D1 protein expression in MCF7:IGF1R xenografts by approximately 50%. These data are highly encouraging and provide a novel genetic approach for tumor specific therapy that may spare normal tissues. In prostate cancer, such a treatment may eliminate incountenance and impotence that most prostate cancer patient suffer from the current mode of therapy.

C.3. Monitoring effectiveness of Therapy

In order to improve therapy regimens, and patient safety, various patient parameters are evaluated ex-vivo using body fluids or in-vivo by external imaging. Periodic estimation of plasma PSA (prostate specific antigen) in prostate cancer patient and the tumor volume or SUV (standard uptake value) assessment by PET imaging are nearly routine methods. However, they are not considered to be fully absolute and totally reliable. Possibilities are strong that periodic longitudinal patient imaging by targeting specific oncogene mRNA will enable physicians to calculate the aggressive upregulation or progressive downregulation of oncogene mRNA copies by a few mouse clicks and to reliably determine the proliferative status of a given tumor following chemo and/or gene therapy. To the referring physicians, such a number will be more meaningful to determine the effectiveness of therapy or to stratify cancer for improved therapeutic intervention. Such practice will not be limited only to oncologic therapy but will also be extended to other gene therapy approaches in which inherited or acquired bad genes are corrected to minimize their consequences. A bad gene will not control mankind’s destiny. Techniques have already been developed to detect a single mRNA molecule (49).

D. Other Possibilities

Intense and growing interest has continued to foster improved understanding of cancer pathogenesis, resulting into an array of biomarkers. Many of these can be applied for diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Such applications combined with Molecular imaging techniques can revolutionize the management of cancer and of cancer patients. Just a couple of examples are given below.

D.1. Tumor Suppressor Gene p-53

The p-53 gene plays a role in normal cell division, DNA repair, detecting inappropriate growth signals in cells and imposing a tumorigenis barrier in precancerous cells. In cells under stress, its transcripts constantly shuttle between the nucleus and cytoplasm providing the protection to the cell. Under severe stress, p-53 gets phosphoylated and ceases its transcription ability, paving the way for cell malignancy and abnormal cell proliferation. In 50% of tumors, phosphorylated p-53 mutation has been found (50).

In the future, guided by specific p-53 probes, molecular imaging will be able to determine p-53 transcription in a cell and its threshold, and thereby be able to predict the susceptibility for cancer. This will warrant preventive therapy on which biologists are already working.

D.2. Ki-67 protein

Ki-67 protein is expressed in all phases of cell cycle except GO and is strongly associated with cell proliferation. Studies have shown that Ki-67 index has a significant correlation, high proliferation rates, and disease free survival (51). This proliferation index has become an important factor in breast cancer management (52). To determine the expression of Ki-67 histologic tissues has drawn considerable attention. Yet nothing has been done to target Ki-67 for noninvasive diagnostic imaging. It is highly likely that Ki-67 will play an important role in diagnostic molecular imaging of cancers. Molecular imaging is a rapidly progressing biomedical modality.

Molecular biology is a relatively young science. Targeting the biomarkers already provided by it, appears to extend the current knowledge to new meaningful dimensions to fight human diseases. However, this is only scratching the surface of the iceberg. The possibilities are endless and limited only by imagination. However, molecular imaging is not only about seeking key biomarkers and smart probes to target them, but it is also about having the equipment to image them.

E. Future Possibilities

Science of understanding the genesis of neoplasm is changing rapidly. Molecular biologists will continue to provide investigators, both in academia and industry, exquisite data about a specific disease as well as about a specific patient. These data will provide selective biomarkers and will enable physicians to ensure better overall patient management strategies with stratifying cancer uniquely for personalized medicine. Personalized medicine will be a major tool in how the drugs will be developed in which specific biomarkers will provide major guidance and molecular imaging will play a pivotal role in their effective applications. In molecular imaging, although development in magnetic resonance and optical imaging, depict a bright future, it appears as if the scintigraphic imaging will continue to lead, particularly when quantification will be the key parameter that will control the decision making process.

What scintigraphic imaging will need is smarter instruments, with higher spatial resolution and greater sensitivity. If microscopes can permit us to see a single cell ex-vivo, a smart imaging tool should allow us to see a cluster of cells in-vivo. Phenomenal progress is being made by innovative scientists in the laboratory. Photo-acousting devices that detect a tumor seated several cm deep in the body with μm resolution (53) or a Raman molecular imaging equipment with a low background that uses quantum dots providing long-term photo stability, not available in fluorescence imaging (54), promise to contribute heavily. Such smart equipment will compliment a smart probe to target a specific biomarker. Together they will permit a true early diagnosis, and will enable the design of a promising therapy that will allow the monitoring of its effectiveness noninvasively.

Molecular imaging will change the practice of medicine in the next generation, more than it has ever been thought possible previously.

Acknowledgement

A part of the content was presented in the 2008 “Cassen Award” presentation at the SNM (The Society of Nuclear Medicine) annual meeting in June 2008 in New Orleans LA. The author is indebted to many of his colleagues, including Eric Wickstrom PhD, and Carol Marcus MD PhD., who have contributed in the work presented. The author also acknowledges the support of NIHCA 10923, CO27175, EB001809, ISIORR23709, and PAME03184.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Cho William CS. Contribution of oncoproteomics to cancer biomarker discovery. Molecular Cancer. 2007;6:25–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Jamel A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer Statistic. Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:43–66.
3. Adelaide J, Monges G, Derderian C, et al. Oesophageal cancer and amplification of the human cyclin D gene CCND1 PRAD1. Br. J. Cancer. 1995;71:64–68. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Vande V, Peterseth MJ, Mooi WJ, et al. NeuProtein overexpression in breast cancer: Associates with comedo type ductal carcinoma in situ and limited prognostic value in stage II breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 1988;319:1239–1245. [PubMed]
5. Mukherjee A, Wickstrom E, Thakur M, et al. Imaging oncogene expression. Journal of Radiology. in press.
6. Gwynne P, Heebner G. Technologies in Cancer Research: Progress at the Molecular level. Science. 2001;291:2183–2203.
7. Raffi S, Lyden D. Afew to Flip the Angeogenic switch. Science. 2008;319:163–164. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Fogarty M. Finding ways to starve the Cancer Seed. The Scientist. 2002;41:31–32.
9. Steinberg D. DNA chips Track Tumor Metastasis. The Scientist. 2002;41:29–30.
10. Hoffman TJ, Gali H, Smith CJ, et al. Novel series of IIIIn-labelel Bombesin analogs as potential radiopharmaceuticals for specific targeting of gastrin-releasing peptide receptors expressed on human prostate cancer cells. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:823–831. [PubMed]
11. Zhernosekov KP, Filosofov DV, Baum RP, et al. Processing of generator-produced 68Ga for medical application. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(10):1741–1748. [PubMed]
12. Kwekkeboom DJ, Bakker WH, Kam BL, et al. Treatment of patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) tumors with the novel radiolabelled somatostatin analogue [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate. Eur J Nucl Med. 2003;30:417–422. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Schumacher T, Hofer S, Eichhorn K, et al. Local injection of the (90)Y-labelled peptide vector DOTATOC to control gliomas of WHO grades II and III: an extended pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med. 2002;29:486–493. [PubMed]
14. Thakur M, Marcus C, Saeed S, et al. 99mTc-Labeled Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide Analog for Rapid Localization of Tumors in Humans. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:107–110. [PubMed]
15. Zhang K, Aruva M, Shanthly N, et al. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (PACAP) receptor specific peptide analogues for PET imaging of breast cancer: In vitro/in vivo evaluation. Regulatory Peptides. 2007;144:91–100. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Thakur ML, Marcus CS, Saeed S, et al. 99mTc-labeled vasoactive intestinal peptide analog for rapid localization of tumors in humans. J Nucl Med. 2000;41(1):107–110. [PubMed]
17. Rao PS, Thakur ML, Pallela V, et al. 99mTc labeled VIP analog: evaluation for imaging colorectal cancer. Nucl Med Biol. 2001;28(4):445–450. [PubMed]
18. Thakur ML, Marcus CS, Kipper SL, et al. Imaging infection with LeuTech. Nucl Med Commun. 2001;22(5):513–519. [PubMed]
19. Thakur ML, Marcus CS, Saeed S, et al. Imaging tumors in humans with Tc-99m-VIP. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;921:37–44. [PubMed]
20. Gottschall PE, Tatsuno I, Miyata A, et al. Characterization and distribution of binding sites for the hypothalamic peptide, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide. Endocrinology. 1990;127:272–277. [PubMed]
21. Laburthe M, Couvineau A. Molecular pharmacology and structure of VPAC receptors for VIP and PACAP. Regul pept. 2002;108:165–173. [PubMed]
22. Laburthe M, Couvineau A, Marie JC. VPAC receptors for VIP and PACAP. Receptors Channels. 2002;8:137–153. [PubMed]
23. Le SV, Yamaguchi DJ, McArdle Ca, et al. PAC1 and PACAP expression, signaling, and effect on the growth of HCT8, human colonic tumor cells. Regul pept. 2002;109:115–125. [PubMed]
24. Germano PM, Le SV, Oh DS, et al. Differential coupling of PAC1 SV1 splice variant of human colonic tumors to the activation of intracellular cAMP But not intracellular Ca2does not activate tumor proliferation. J Mol Neurosci. 2004;22:83–92. [PubMed]
25. Schulz S, Rocken C, Mawrin C, et al. Immunocytochemical identification of VPAC1, VPAC2 and PAC1 receptors in normal and neoplastic human tissues with subtype specific antibodies. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:8234–8242. [PubMed]
26. Reubi JC. Neuropeptide receptors in health and disease: the molecular basis for in vivo imaging. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1825–1825. [PubMed]
27. Reubi JC. Regulatory peptide receptors as molecular targets for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Q J Nucl Med. 1997;41:63–70. [PubMed]
28. Reubi JC, Laderach U, Waser B, et al. Vasoactive intestinal peptide/pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide receptor subtypes in human tumors and their tissues of origin. Cancer Res. 2000;60:3105–3012. [PubMed]
29. Pallela VR, Thakur ML, Chakder, et al. Tc-99m labeled vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor agonist: functional studies. J Nucl Med Biol. 1999;40:352–360. [PubMed]
30. Thakur Ml, Aruva M, Bolewska-Pedyczak E, et al. Preparation of Cu-64 and Tc-99m-N2S2-vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) for imaging gene expression [abstract] J Labelled Compds Radiopharm. 2003;46:S128.
31. Bostwick DG, Murphy G. High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: the most likely precursor of prostate cancer. Cancer. 1995;75:1823–1836.
32. Thompson IM, Lucia MS, Redman MW, et al. Finasteride decreases the risk of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. J Urol. 2007;178(1):107–109. [PubMed]
33. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hall marks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100:57–70. [PubMed]
34. Tian X, Aruva MR, Zhang K, et al. PET imaging of CCND1 mRNA in human MCF7 estrogen receptor positive breast cancer xenografts with oncogene-specific [64Cu] chelator-peptide nucleic acid-IGF1 analog radiohybridization probes. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(1):112–121. [PubMed]
35. Chakrabarti A, Zhang K, Aruva MR, et al. Radiohybridization PET imaging of KRAS G12D mRNA expression in human pancreas cancer xenografts with [(64)Cu]DO3A-peptide nucleic acid-peptide nanoparticles. Cancer Biol Ther. 2007;6:948–956. [PubMed]
36. Tian X, Chakrabarti A, Amirkhanov N, et al. Receptor-mediated internalization of chelator-PNA-peptide hybridization probes for radioimaging or magnetic resonance imaging of oncogene mRNAs in tumours. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35(Pt 1):72–76. [PubMed]
37. Tian X, Chakrabarti A, Amirkhanov NV, et al. External imaging of CCND1, MYC, and KRAS oncogene mRNAs with tumor-targeted radionuclide-PNA-peptide chimeras. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1059:106–144. [PubMed]
38. Tian X, Aruva MR, Wolfe HR, et al. Tumor-targeting peptide-PNA-peptide chimeras for imaging overexpressed oncogene mRNAs. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2005;24(57):1085–1091. [PubMed]
39. Chakrabarti A, Aruva MR, Sajankila SP. Synthesis of novel peptide nucleic acid-peptide chimera for non-invasive imaging of cancer. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 24(57):409–414. [PubMed]
40. Tian X, Aruva MR, Qin W, et al. Noninvasive molecular imaging of MYC mRNA expression in human breast cancer xenografts with a [99mTc]peptide-peptide nucleic acid-peptide chimera. Bioconjug Chem. 2005;16(1):70–79. [PubMed]
41. Tian Z, Aruva MR, Qin W, et al. experimental human breast cancer xenografts with 99mTc-peptide-peptide nucleic acid-peptide chimeras. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(12):2070–2082. [PubMed]
42. Wickstrom E, Tian X, Amirkhanov NV, et al. Radionuclide-peptide nucleic acid in diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer. Methods Mol Med. 2005;106:135–191. [PubMed]
43. Thakur ML, Aruva M, Zhang K, et al. unpublished data.
44. Agarwal S. Antisense oligonculeotides; towards clinical trials. Trends in biotechnology. 1996;14(10):376–378. [PubMed]
45. Ho PT, Parkinson DR. Antisense oligonculeotides as therapeutics for malignant diseases. Semin Oncology. 1987;24(2):187–202. [PubMed]
46. Aboyul-FadI T. Antisense oligonculeotides: the state of art. Curr Med Chemistry. 2005;12(19):2193–2214. [PubMed]
47. Stahel RA, Zangemeister-Wittke U. Antisense oligonculeotides for cancer therapy-an overview. Lung Cancer. 2003;(suppl 1):S81–8. [PubMed]
48. Tamm I. Antisense therapy in malignant diseases: status quo and quo vadis? Clin Sci (Lond) 2006;110(4):427–442. [PubMed]
49. Femino Am, Fay FS, Fogarty K, et al. Visualization of single molecules of mRNA in situ. Methods Enzymol. 2003;361:245–304. [PubMed]
50. Gottifredi V, Prives C. Molecular biology. Getting p53 out of the nucleus. Science. 2001;292(5523):1851–1852. [PubMed]
51. Tan PH, Bay BH, Yip G, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of Ki67 in breast cancer correlates with transcriptional regulation of genes related to apoptosis and cell death. Mod Pathol. 2005;18(3):374–381. [PubMed]
52. Liu S, Edgerton SM, Moore DH, et al. Measures of cell turnover (proliferation and apoptosis) and their association with survival in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7(6):1716–1723. [PubMed]
53. Zhang HF, Maslov K, Stoica G, et al. Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24(7):848–851. [PubMed]
54. Keren S, Zavaleta C, Cheng Z, et al. Noninvasive molecular imaging of small living subjects using Raman spectroscopy. PNAs. 2008;105:5844–5849. [PubMed]