Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Nature. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 October 9.
Published in final edited form as:
Published online 2009 February 15. doi:  10.1038/nature07823
PMCID: PMC2729443

c-Myc suppression of miR-23 enhances mitochondrial glutaminase and glutamine metabolism

Altered glucose metabolism in cancer cells is termed the Warburg effect, which describes the propensity for most cancer cells to take up glucose avidly and convert it primarily to lactate, despite available oxygen 1,2. Notwithstanding the renewed interest in the Warburg effect, cancer cells also depend on continued mitochondrial function for metabolism, specifically glutaminolysis that catabolizes glutamine to generate ATP and lactate3. Glutamine, which is highly transported into proliferating cells4,5, is a major source for energy and nitrogen for biosynthesis, and a carbon substrate for anabolic processes in cancer cells, but the regulation of glutamine metabolism is not well understood1,6. Here, we report that the c-Myc (or Myc) oncogenic transcription factor, which is known to regulate miRNAs7,8 and stimulate cell proliferation9, transcriptionally represses miR-23a and miR-23b, resulting in greater expression of their target protein, mitochondrial glutaminase (GLS). This leads to up-regulation of glutamine catabolism10. GLS converts glutamine to glutamate that is further catabolized through the TCA cycle for the production of ATP or serves as substrate for glutathione synthesis11. The unique means by which Myc regulates GLS reported herein uncovers a previously unsuspected link between Myc regulation of miRNAs, glutamine metabolism, and energy and reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis.

Oncogenes and tumor suppressors have now been linked to the regulation of glucose metabolism, thereby connecting genetic alterations in cancers to their glucose metabolic phenotype1,2. In particular, the MYC oncogene produces Myc protein that directly regulates glucose metabolic enzymes as well as genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis9,12. In this regard, we sought to determine the role of the MYC in altering the mitochondrial proteome to further understand regulation of tumor metabolism. We studied the human P-493 B cells that bear a tetracycline-repressible MYC construct, such that tetracycline withdrawal results in rapid induction of Myc and mitochondrial biogenesis, followed by cell proliferation12,13. By comparing the mitochondrial proteome from tetracycline-treated and untreated cells with high Myc expression, we found 8 mitochondrial proteins that are distinctly differentially expressed in response to Myc (Figures 1a, 1b and Tables S1). We note that mitochondrial glutaminase or GLS (MW~58kDa) was increased ~10-fold in response to Myc. As such, we determined the response of glutaminase to Myc induction in a time-course study using anti-GLS antibody10 (Figure 1c) and found that GLS levels diminish with decreased Myc expression and recover upon Myc re-induction. However, the level of the mitochondrial protein TFAM remained virtually unaltered. GLS levels also correlate with Myc levels in another human B cell line (CB33) and one (CB33-Myc) with constitutive Myc expression14. Since human prostate cancer is linked to Myc expression15, we sought to determine whether reduction of Myc expression by siRNA in the human PC3 prostate cancer cell line was also associated with reduction of GLS expression (Figure 1d). Similar to the human lymphoid cells, the PC3 cells also displayed a correlation between Myc and GLS levels.

Figure 1
1a. The expanded insets of 2-dimensional gels reveal the induction of glutaminase (GLS; highlighted by white circles) by Myc in P493-6 B cells. For each condition, 350μg of mitochondrial protein lysate was resolved on 18 cm immobilized pH gradient ...

We then sought to determine whether the dramatic alteration of GLS levels in response to Myc is functionally linked to Myc-induced cell proliferation. While there are two major known tissue-specific GLS isoforms, GLS1 and GLS216,17, our data showed that only GLS1 is predominantly expressed in P493-6 or PC3 cells (Figure S1). We first determined whether gain of GLS1 function through overexpression in PC3 cells would rescue the diminished growth rate associated with siRNA-mediated reduction of Myc (Figure S2) and found that ectopic GLS1 expression alone is insufficient to stimulate growth. In light of the observation that no single gene could substitute for Myc 18,19 and that Myc is a pleiotropic transcription factor9, this outcome was not particularly surprising. As such, we reduced the expression of GLS1 (herein referred to as GLS) by RNA interference (siGLS) and found that P-493-6 cell proliferation is markedly attenuated by siGLS but not by control siRNA (Figure 2a). Likewise, proliferation of the human PC3 prostate cancer cell line was diminished by siGLS (Figure 2a), indicating that GLS is necessary for cell proliferation.

Figure 2
2a. Top panel, immunoblots document that GLS protein level was diminished by transfecting the cells with siRNA for GLS1 (siGLS) as compared to non transfection (No tx) or control siRNA (siCont); Lower panel, Growth inhibition of P493 and PC3 cells by ...

Because glutamine is converted by GLS to glutamate for further catabolism by the TCA cycle and previous studies indicate that overexpression of Myc sensitizes human cells to glutamine withdrawal induced apoptosis11, we determined the metabolic responses of P493-6 or PC3 cells to glutamine deprivation (Figure 2b). The growth of both cell lines was diminished significantly by glutamine withdrawal and moderately with glucose withdrawal. Glutamine withdrawal also resulted in a decrease in ATP levels (Figure 2c) associated with a diminished cellular oxygen consumption rate (Figures S3a and S3b). Reduction of GLS by RNAi also reduced ATP levels (Figure 2d). Because glutamine is a precursor for glutathione20, glutathione levels were measured by flow cytometry and were found diminished with glutamine withdrawal or RNAi mediated reduction of GLS (Figure S4 and Table S2) that is also associated with an increase in ROS levels (Figure S3c) and cell death in the P493-6 cells (Figures (Figures2e2e and S5). It is notable shortly after the MYC proto-oncogene was discovered, that the MC29 retrovirus which bears the v-myc oncogene was found to enhance glutamine catabolism and mitochondrial respiration in transplantable avian liver tumor cells21. Thus, our findings functionally link historical observations with Myc, glutaminase and glutamine metabolism.

Since GLS catabolizes glutamine for ATP and glutathione synthesis, its reduction affects proliferation and cell death presumably through depletion of ATP and augmentation of ROS, respectively. Hence, we sought to rescue the P493-6 cells with the TCA cycle metabolite oxaloacetate (OAA) and the oxygen radical scavenger N-acetylcysteine (NAC)11. Both OAA and NAC partially rescued the decreased proliferation and death of P493-6 cells deprived of GLS (Figures (Figures2e2e and S6). Likewise, OAA and NAC both partially rescued glutamine-deprived P493-6 cells (Figures S5 and S6). These findings support the notion that glutamine catabolism through GLS is critical for cell proliferation induced by Myc and protection against ROS generated by enhanced mitochondrial function in response to Myc11,20.

Given that GLS is critical for cell proliferation and is induced by Myc, we determined the mechanism by which Myc regulates GLS. Because Myc is a transcription factor9, we hypothesized that Myc transactivates GLS directly as a target gene. Despite the presence of a canonical Myc binding site (5′-CACGTG-3′) in the GLS gene intron 1, GLS mRNA levels do not respond to alterations in Myc levels in the P493-6 cells, suggesting that GLS is regulated at the post-transcriptional level (Figure 3a). As such, we hypothesized that GLS could be regulated by miRNAs that are in turn directly regulated by Myc. The TargetScan algorithm predicts that miR-23a and miR-23b could target the GLS 3′UTR seed sequence. Intriguingly, our earlier studies uncovered that both miR-23a and miR-23b are suppressed by Myc in P493-6 cells7, and both miR-23s are decreased in human prostate cancers22, which are associated with elevated Myc expression15.

Figure 3
3a. P493-6 cells were treated with tetracycline (Tet) for different lengths of time to inhibit Myc expression or were treated first with tetracycline for 48h and then washed (Wash) to remove tetracycline with the times after wash out indicated. RNA was ...

To verify that miR-23a and miR-23b (herein referred to as miR-23) are suppressed by Myc and could be diminished by antisense miR-23 locked nucleic acid (LNA) oligomers, northern analysis was performed and miR-23 was suppressed by Myc and profoundly diminished by antisense miR-23 LNAs (Figure 3b). Using quantitative real-time PCR, we document (Figure S7) that miR-23 levels increased with diminished Myc expression and then decreased upon Myc re-induction in a manner that is compatible with the GLS protein levels seen in Figure 1c. We also found an inverse relationship between Myc and the levels of miR-23a and miR-23b in the CB33 human lymphoid cells and PC3 prostate cancer cell line (Figure S8). Furthermore, Myc directly bound the transcriptional unit, C9orf3, encompassing miR-23b, as demonstrated for other Myc miRNA targets7 by chromatin immunoprecipitation (Figure 3c). Because the transcriptional unit involving miR-23a has not been mapped, we did not study miR-23a in this context. These observations document that Myc represses miR-23a and miR23b, which appear to be directly regulated by Myc.

We determined next whether miR-23 targets and inhibits the expression of GLS through the 3′UTR. In this regard, we cloned the 3′UTR sequence of GLS including the predicted binding site for miR-23 to the pGL3 luciferase reporter vector and transfected MCF-7 cells, which is known to express miR-2323. The GLS 3′UTR inhibited luciferase activity in a fashion that was blocked by co-transfection with the antisense miR-23 LNAs, but not with control LNAs (Figure 3d). We next mutated the predicted binding site by a site-directed mutagenesis strategy8 and observed that mutant 3′UTR did not inhibit luciferase activity as the wild-type sequence did. Using these reporters in PC3 cells, we observed that siRNA-mediated diminished Myc expression resulted in decreased luciferase activity with wild-type but not with the mutant 3′UTR reporter (Figure S9). Most importantly, diminished GLS protein level, which follows decreased Myc expression (Figure 1c), was rescued by antisense miR-23 LNAs (Figure 3e). The antisense miR-23 LNAs also partially rescued the diminished GLS level associated with RNAi-mediated reduction of Myc expression in the PC3 cells (Figure 3e).

We also examined events upstream and downstream of GLS24 and found that the glutamine transporter SLC7A5 is induced by Myc in P493-6 cells at the transcriptional level (5-fold by nuclear run-on, unpublished data) with a >7-fold induction of its mRNA level. The glutamine transporter ASCT2 is induced by Myc at the mRNA level by 2-fold, whereas glutamate dehydrogenase mRNA levels appear unaltered (unpublished data). Furthermore, we found that elevated levels of Myc protein in human prostate cancer correspond to levels of GLS, which was not increased in the accompanying normal tissue from the same patients (Figure S10). Intriguingly, miR-23a and miR-23b are significantly decreased in human prostate cancer as compared with normal prostate tissue22. It is notable that loss of GLS function by antisense suppression significantly inhibited the tumorigenesis of Ehrlich ascites tumor cells in vivo25. Our findings here uncover a pathway by which Myc suppression of miR-23, which targets GLS, enhances glutamine catabolism through increased mitochondrial glutaminase expression. Taken together, these observations provide a regulatory mechanism involving Myc and miRNAs for elevated expression of glutaminase and glutamine metabolism in human cancers.

Methods Summary

Human cell lines were cultured under standard conditions. Isolation of mitochondria, enrichment for mitochondrial proteins, and proteomic analysis were performed as described26-29. RNA interference experiments and luciferase reporter analysis of miRNA activity were as reported8,30. Flow cytometric analyses of reactive oxygen species, cell death and glutathione level were performed as described11,30. Human samples were acquired with the approval of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board.

Supplementary Material


The authors want to thank Lee Blosser and Ada Tam for their generous help in flowcytometry analysis and Huiyuan Zhang for her expertise in statistical analysis. This work was partially supported by NIH Awards NHLBI NO1-HV-28180, NCI R01CA051497, NCI R01CA57341, NCI R01CA120185, Rita Allen Foundation, Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, and Sol Goldman Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research.


The authors have no competing financial interest.


1. Deberardinis RJ, Sayed N, Ditsworth D, Thompson CB. Brick by brick: metabolism and tumor cell growth. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2008;18:54–61. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Kroemer G, Pouyssegur J. Tumor cell metabolism: cancer's Achilles' heel. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:472–82. [PubMed]
3. DeBerardinis RJ, et al. Beyond aerobic glycolysis: transformed cells can engage in glutamine metabolism that exceeds the requirement for protein and nucleotide synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:19345–50. [PubMed]
4. Reitzer LJ, Wice BM, Kennell D. Evidence that glutamine, not sugar, is the major energy source for cultured HeLa cells. J Biol Chem. 1979;254:2669–76. [PubMed]
5. Gallagher FA, Kettunen MI, Day SE, Lerche M, Brindle KM. 1C MR spectroscopy measurements of glutaminase activity in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells using hyperpolarized 13C-labeled glutamine. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60:253–7. [PubMed]
6. Curthoys NP, Watford M. Regulation of glutaminase activity and glutamine metabolism. Annu Rev Nutr. 1995;15:133–59. [PubMed]
7. Chang TC, et al. Widespread microRNA repression by Myc contributes to tumorigenesis. Nat Genet. 2008;40:43–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. O'Donnell KA, Wentzel EA, Zeller KI, Dang CV, Mendell JT. c-Myc-regulated microRNAs modulate E2F1 expression. Nature. 2005;435:839–43. [PubMed]
9. Eilers M, Eisenman RN. Myc's broad reach. Genes Dev. 2008;22:2755–66. [PubMed]
10. Kita K, Suzuki T, Ochi T. Down-regulation of glutaminase C in human hepatocarcinoma cell by diphenylarsinic acid, a degradation product of chemical warfare agents. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007;220:262–70. [PubMed]
11. Yuneva M, Zamboni N, Oefner P, Sachidanandam R, Lazebnik Y. Deficiency in glutamine but not glucose induces MYC-dependent apoptosis in human cells. J Cell Biol. 2007;178:93–105. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Li F, et al. Myc stimulates nuclearly encoded mitochondrial genes and mitochondrial biogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:6225–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Schuhmacher M, et al. Control of cell growth by c-Myc in the absence of cell division. Curr Biol. 1999;9:1255–8. [PubMed]
14. Lombardi L, Newcomb EW, Dalla-Favera R. Pathogenesis of Burkitt lymphoma: expression of an activated c-myc oncogene causes the tumorigenic conversion of EBV-infected human B lymphoblasts. Cell. 1987;49:161–70. [PubMed]
15. Gurel B, et al. Nuclear MYC protein overexpression is an early alteration in human prostate carcinogenesis. Mod Pathol. 2008;21:1156–67. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Perez-Gomez C, et al. Co-expression of glutaminase K and L isoenzymes in human tumour cells. Biochem J. 2005;386:535–42. [PubMed]
17. Turner A, McGivan JD. Glutaminase isoform expression in cell lines derived from human colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. Biochem J. 2003;370:403–8. [PubMed]
18. Berns K, Hijmans EM, Koh E, Daley GQ, Bernards R. A genetic screen to identify genes that rescue the slow growth phenotype of c-myc null fibroblasts. Oncogene. 2000;19:3330–4. [PubMed]
19. Nikiforov MA, et al. Complementation of Myc-dependent cell proliferation by cDNA expression library screening. Oncogene. 2000;19:4828–31. [PubMed]
20. Lora J, et al. Antisense glutaminase inhibition decreases glutathione antioxidant capacity and increases apoptosis in Ehrlich ascitic tumour cells. Eur J Biochem. 2004;271:4298–306. [PubMed]
21. Matsuno T, Satoh T, Suzuki H. Prominent glutamine oxidation activity in mitochondria of avian transplantable hepatoma induced by MC-29 virus. J Cell Physiol. 1986;128:397–401. [PubMed]
22. Porkka KP, et al. MicroRNA expression profiling in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2007;67:6130–5. [PubMed]
23. Landgraf P, et al. A mammalian microRNA expression atlas based on small RNA library sequencing. Cell. 2007;129:1401–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Bode BP. Recent molecular advances in mammalian glutamine transport. J Nutr. 2001;131:2475S–85S. discussion 2486S-7S. [PubMed]
25. Lobo C, et al. Inhibition of glutaminase expression by antisense mRNA decreases growth and tumourigenicity of tumour cells. Biochem J. 2000;348(Pt 2):257–61. [PubMed]
26. Rabilloud T, et al. The mitochondrial antioxidant defence system and its response to oxidative stress. Proteomics. 2001;1:1105–10. [PubMed]
27. Anderson TJ, et al. Discovering robust protein biomarkers for disease from relative expression reversals in 2-D DIGE data. Proteomics. 2007;7:1197–207. [PubMed]
28. Kersey PJ, et al. The International Protein Index: an integrated database for proteomics experiments. Proteomics. 2004;4:1985–8. [PubMed]
29. Yates JR, 3rd, Eng JK, McCormack AL, Schieltz D. Method to correlate tandem mass spectra of modified peptides to amino acid sequences in the protein database. Anal Chem. 1995;67:1426–36. [PubMed]
30. Gao P, et al. HIF-dependent antitumorigenic effect of antioxidants in vivo. Cancer Cell. 2007;12:230–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]