PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Atherosclerosis. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 June 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2729052
NIHMSID: NIHMS123718

Osteoprotegerin, vascular calcification and atherosclerosis

Abstract

The association of bone pathologies with atherosclerosis has stimulated the search for common mediators linking the skeletal and the vascular system. Since its initial discovery as a key regulator in bone metabolism, osteoprotegerin (OPG) has become the subject of intense interest for its role in vascular disease and calcification. Studies in vitro and in animal models suggest that OPG inhibits vascular calcification. Paradoxically however, clinical studies suggest that serum OPG levels increase in association with vascular calcification, coronary artery disease, stroke and future cardiovascular events. This has led to extensive debate on the potential of OPG as a biomarker of vascular disease. However the exact significance and mechanisms by which this bone-regulatory protein influences cardiovascular pathophysiology is still unclear. The need for a more complete picture is being addressed in increasing valuable research indicating OPG as not only a marker but also a mediator of vascular pathology modulating osteogenic, inflammatory and apoptotic responses. By integrating the results of recent experimental research, animal models and clinical studies, this review summarises the present understanding of the role of OPG in vascular disease and calcification.

Keywords: osteoprotegerin, vascular disease, calcification, inflammation, apoptosis

Introduction

A large number of studies have demonstrated a relationship between bone pathology and vascular disease. The coexistence of osteoporosis and features of atherosclerosis, particularly vascular calcification, has been consistently demonstrated and is most prevalent in postmenopausal women and elderly people 15. These observations suggest that there are common pathways which negatively affect bone metabolism and the vasculature. New insights in this field are emerging since the discovery of osteoprotegerin (OPG) in 1997 as a key regulator in bone turnover 68.

In a mouse model, deficiency of OPG (OPG −/−) resulted in severe osteoporosis but also the unexpected phenotype of vascular calcification 9. Since this combination of osteoporotic bone loss and arterial mineral accumulation mirrors similar associations seen in patients, OPG was suggested as a key link between bone and vascular disease 10. Although most animal studies support a protective role for OPG in the vasculature 11, observational studies in patients have paradoxically shown a positive association between serum OPG levels and clinical cardiovascular disease 12. Whether elevated OPG is simply a marker of vascular damage, represents a counter-regulatory mechanism aimed to limit vascular disease or actively mediates disease progression is not immediately clear. To understand its complete mode of action on the interplay between bone and vascular disease, the pleiotrophic and reciprocal relations between OPG and calcification, inflammation and apoptosis as well as those of its ligands must be taken into consideration.

The OPG/ RANK/ RANKL/TRAIL system

OPG is a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related family and part of the OPG/ receptor activator of NF- κB ligand (RANKL)/ receptor activator of NF- κB (RANK) triad. This cytokine network regulates the differentiation and activation of osteoclasts and hence the critical balance between bone formation (osteoblasts) and bone resorption (osteoclasts). RANKL expressed on osteoblastic, stromal and T cells binds to RANK on the surface of osteoclasts, monocytic and dendritic cells 13. RANKL-RANK interactions initiate intracellular signalling cascades including NF- κB required for osteoclast differentiation and activity 14. OPG is a soluble glycoprotein widely expressed in most human tissues including the bone (osteoblasts) and the vasculature (endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells, VSMC) 10,15,16. By acting as a soluble decoy receptor competing for RANKL, OPG prevents RANK-RANKL interactions and thus osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption 6. Besides RANKL, OPG is also able to bind and neutralise the pro-apoptotic actions of TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) expressed by VSMC and T cells1719. Additional roles in immunological responses include the RANK-RANKL binding between dendritic and T cells which enhances the immunostimulatory capacity of dendritic cells and T cell proliferation 20. Furthermore, OPG is critically involved in efficient antibody responses and B cell maturation 21.

OPG and vascular disease: lessons learned from animal models

Vascular medial calcification

A study of OPG−/− mice generated on a mixed genetic background provided the first evidence for a role of OPG in the vasculature since surprisingly, 2/3rd of the animals displayed medial calcification of the renal arteries and aorta 9. According to the passive theory, such calcification could result from arterial accumulation of matrix products liberated from uncontrolled osteoclast degradation of bone. Interestingly however, these arteries are sites of endogenous OPG expression in normal mice suggesting that OPG has an additional protective role against pathological calcification within the vasculature 9,22. The onset of arterial calcification in OPG−/−mice could be completely prevented by transgenic OPG delivered from mid gestation through adulthood. In contrast, post-natal intravenous injection of recombinant OPG had no effect on the incidence of vascular calcification suggesting that OPG cannot reverse the calcification process once it had occurred 22. Further studies using OPG−/− mice produced on a pure C57BL/6 background have suggested that aortic calcification is more limited than originally proposed (unpublished studies in our laboratory) and induced calcification models have been established to gain further insight into the role of OPG in vascular calcification23. Compared to OPG+/+ controls, high phosphate diet and lα,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 treatment in OPG−/− mice augmented severe medial calcification which co-localised with vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) 23. Neither apoptosis nor macrophage infiltration were observed in areas of calcification. The correlation between increased aortic alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, a crucial initiator of mineralisation, and the aortic calcification area in OPG−/− mice suggested an anti-calcification role of OPG through downregulation of ALP activity. In accordance with these findings, a rat model showed the ability of OPG administration to prevent vascular calcification induced by warfarin or high vitamin D doses 24.

Atherosclerotic progression and calcification

Although the renal arteries and aorta are common sites of calcification in atherosclerosis patients, the calcification in OPG−/− mouse arteries occurred in the absence of fat deposition or atherosclerotic-like plaques and involved medial calcium deposition rather than the intimal calcification observed in atherosclerosis 9. To examine the role of OPG in atherosclerosis, Bennet et al. generated mice deficient in both OPG and Apolipoprotein E (OPG−/− ApoE−/− ). Compared to OPG+/+ ApoE−/− mice, the additional inactivation of OPG resulted in increased atherosclerotic lesion size and calcification at 40 and 60 weeks. This suggests that OPG protects against advanced atherosclerotic lesion progression and calcification in older ApoE−/−mice11. In another recent study by Morony and colleagues, treatment of atherogenic diet-fed mice deficient in low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR−/−) with recombinant OPG significantly reduced the calcified lesion area and mineralisation marker osteocalcin but without affecting the atherosclerotic lesion size or vascular cytokines 25. The disparate results of these study models might be explained by different influences of excessive exogenous OPG compared to endogenous OPG deficiency. If OPG plays a protective role against atherosclerosis, it is possible this effect only requires small endogenous concentrations without additional benefit from exogenous delivered OPG. Moreover, OPG deficiency only seemed to exert its vascular effects at older ages (>40 weeks) whereas the LDLR−/− mice received OPG treatment for a maximum of 5 months. Moreover, the increased atherosclerotic progression in OPG deficient mice could be a consequence of enhanced calcification itself driving inflammatory processes in the absence of a direct role for OPG 26.

The model of Morony and colleagues would appear more clinically relevant since excess OPG is typically present in patients with atherosclerosis. These investigators also noted that there were increased serum OPG levels in the untreated LDLR−/− mice following commencing an atherogenic diet. The concentrations of OPG did not increase further with progression of atherosclerosis which suggested that OPG was a marker of onset rather than a mediator of progression of atherosclerosis. In conclusion, the data from animal models uniformly support an anti-calcification role for OPG, protecting against (induced) medial calcification as well atherosclerotic calcification. However, the role of OPG in the progression of atherosclerosis is less clear.

Human studies of OPG in vascular disease

Over recent years, numerous clinical studies have consistently reported higher serum levels of OPG in association with cardiovascular outcome including coronary artery disease (CAD), vascular calcification, advanced atherosclerosis, diabetic complications, heart failure, abdominal aortic aneurysm and cardiovascular mortality 12. In addition to the reports outlined in an excellent review by Kiechl et al. 12, here we summarise the main results and discuss the recent clinical studies investigating the vascular role of OPG (Table 1).

Table 1
Recent epidemiological studies assessing the association between serum OPG concentrations and cardiovascular pathology.

Raised serum OPG levels have been associated with the presence and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis in three cross-sectional studies of CAD patients undergoing coronary angiography 2729. Moreover polymorphisms in the OPG gene have been linked to CAD 30,31. Elevated serum OPG concentrations have been found to correlate with the severity of peripheral artery disease 32 and heart failure 33,34. In addition, circulating OPG levels appear to be higher in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis 35, unstable angina 36, vulnerable carotid plaques 37 and acute myocardial infarction 38 compared to controls with stable atherosclerosis. Recent data from the Dallas Heart Study, a large-scale unselected population-based survey, demonstrate the increased prevalence of aortic plaque and coronary artery calcification (CAC) across serum OPG quartiles 39. After adjustment for conventional risk factors, the upper OPG quartile was found to be independently associated with the prevalence and extent of CAC and aortic plaque. In addition to reports of serum OPG levels as a risk factor for the extent 40,41 and progression42 of vascular calcification in hemodialysis patients, this is the first epidemiological evidence of a relation between serum OPG levels and artery calcification in an unselected population. Although not consistently found by all studies 28,43, a large body of data supports the association between vascular calcification and serum OPG levels. In addition to most association studies concentrating on the coronary circulation, Clancy et al. recently reported an association between serum levels of OPG and infrarenal abdominal aorta calcification in patients with peripheral vascular disease 44. In patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis, a chronic inflammatory disease characterised by accelerated atherosclerosis, increased serum OPG concentrations have been independently associated with the severity of CAC 45. Interestingly, the association of elevated OPG with inflammation markers and arterial stiffness 45,46 suggest that OPG may provide a mechanistic link between CAC and inflammation. The prospective report of Anand et al. found that of the range of biochemical markers assessed, only OPG predicted the extent of CAC and subsequent cardiovascular events in asymptomatic diabetic patients 47. In a further study, they found OPG to be a predictor of CAC progression in these patients 48.

The predictive value of serum OPG levels in the general population was first addressed in the Bruneck study. In this 10 year follow-up survey, serum OPG levels were found to represent an independent risk factor for the progression of atherosclerosis and the incidence as well as mortality from cardiovascular disease 49. The prognostic significance of increased serum OPG concentrations as a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality and morbidity has been confirmed in selected conditions of accelerated atherosclerosis such as elderly women 50, hemodialysis patients 51 and diabetic subjects 47,52,53. In addition to predicting the survival of patients with post-infarction heart failure 54, serum OPG was found to be strongly and independent predictive for long-term mortality and heart failure development in patients with acute coronary syndromes 55. Another prospective study conducted by Moran and colleagues reported the positive association between serum OPG levels and the growth rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms 56. In patients on long-term hemodialysis 42 as well as in asymptomatic diabetic patients 48, higher serum OPG concentrations predicted the extent and rapid progression of calcified plaques in the aorta.

To gain more insight the role of OPG in atherosclerotic development, subsequent studies have focused on its relation with endothelial dysfunction, an important early physiological event in atherosclerosis. The association between elevated serum OPG levels and impaired endothelial function, measured as decreased flow-mediated dilatation of the brachial artery (FMAD), was first demonstrated in a cross-sectional survey of type 2 diabetic patients 57. This was followed by prospective studies in newly diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients which showed a significant correlation of the decreases in serum OPG levels with the improvements in FMAD endothelial function 58,59. Similar findings were recently reported in peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients by Golledge et al. which confirmed the correlation between increased serum OPG levels and decreased FMAD endothelial function 60. Also in postmenopausal women, elevated serum OPG levels were considered to be predictive for the presence of preclinical atherosclerotic damage measured as decreased FMAD and increased carotid intima media thickness 61.

The possibility that OPG might be associated with ventricular function was suggested by the increased circulating and myocardial OPG concentrations found after heart failure due to ischemic cardiomyopathy 34,53 or left ventricular (LV) pressure overload 33. In the general population, a strong and independent association was demonstrated between serum OPG levels and indices of LV hypertrophy in male subjects and with indices of LV function in both sexes 62.

Mechanism underlying the vascular role of OPG

The data from clinical studies consistently report an association between OPG and the presence, severity and progression of a broad range of cardiovascular diseases. Whether OPG is a marker or rather plays a causal role in mediating or protecting against vascular injury is presently unclear. The mechanisms underlying the postulated role of OPG in atherosclerosis may involve endothelial and ventricular dysfunction, inflammation and calcification. A number of investigators have studied the expression pattern of OPG/RANK/RANKL in the normal and pathological vasculature and the cellular effects of OPG in an attempt to advance understanding of the role of OPG in arterial disease.

OPG/RANK/RANKL expression

Vascular cells producing OPG include endothelial cells and VSMC whereas RANKL is mainly expressed on infiltrating T cells, activated endothelial cells and RANK is expressed on monocytic osteoclast precursors as well as dendritic cells12,26,63.

Although OPG is expressed in normal mice vessels, RANK and RANKL are not detected in the arteries of normal adult mice22. Interestingly, RANK and RANKL were detected in the calcified arteries of OPG−/− mice and RANK expression coincided with the presence of multinuclear osteoclast-like cells. This may indicate that vascular OPG protects against RANK-RANKL induced osteoclast formation although the presence of functional osteoclasts in the calcified arteries and their potential significance are not clear 22 In the atherosclerotic arteries of ApoE−/− mice, OPG staining was most apparent adjacent to foam cells, while that of RANK and RANKL was located in areas rich in T cells 36. Tissue concentrations of these mediators were highest in vulnerable plaque phenotypes (ApoE−/− x CD4dnTβRII mice) 36.

In line with the mouse models, RANKL and RANK are frequently undetected in the non-diseased human vessel while OPG is expressed in a wide range of tissues including normal arteries 15. Early and advanced human atherosclerotic lesions of carotid arteries 35,64 and abdominal aortas 65 have both RANKL and OPG immunoreactivity and mRNA expression.

OPG was mainly localized adjacent to calcified neointimal regions at the margins of lamellar bone-like structures 64,65 while RANKL was only present in the extracellular matrix surrounding calcified deposits 65. Of note is the enhanced apoptosis surrounding calcified regions together with the similar spatial distribution pattern of OPG and TRAIL 64. OPG has also been detected in the calcified areas of the medial layer in Monckeberg’s sclerosis64 and found in increased concentrations in the aortic media of diabetic subjects 66. In contrast, human aortic valves of aortic stenosis patients showed significant lower OPG-positive cells in the calcified areas compared to non-calcified regions 67. Other locations of OPG expression in the cardiovasculature include the myocardium which shows increased OPG expression in cardiomyocytes of patients with heart failure due to dilated or ischaemic cardiomyopathy 34,68. Strong immunostaining for OPG/RANKL/RANK was also found within thrombus at the site of plaque rupture 36. The enhanced T-cell expression of RANKL in unstable atheroma 36 and the increased tissue OPG concentrations in symptomatic carotid atherosclerosis 35 could suggest that the OPG/RANK/RANKL axis plays an important role in plaque destabilisation. To translate these expression profiles to the mechanisms underlying the vascular role of OPG, osteogenic, inflammatory, apoptotic and hormonal pathways affecting cellular OPG production and actions must be taken into account.

OPG and Vascular Calcification

The mechanisms underlying the inhibitory effect of OPG on vascular calcification in animal models could be passive or cellular. The potential anti-apoptotic effect of OPG by binding TRAIL reduces the number of apoptotic bodies that may serve as nucleation sites for passive mineralisation 69,70. On the other hand, vascular calcification is believed to be an active cell-mediated process resembling osteogenesis and involving the expression of bone-related proteins such as ALP, a crucial initiator for bone mineralisation 65,7175. In addition to the possible contribution of osteoblastic progenitor cells7678 and myofibroblasts79, it is widely accepted that VSMCs are the primary target of osteogenic differentiation75,8082. In OPG−/−mice, increased serum ALP was found to normalise after recombinant OPG administration 22 and aortic ALP activity correlated with the calcified lesion area 23. These results suggest that OPG may inhibit the active calcification process through downregulation of ALP activity. Moreover, OPG blocks the actions of RANKL which is found increased in diseased and calcified vessels 22,25,67 and can in vitro induce ALP activity and calcification in vascular cells 67. OPG deficiency has been associated with decreased aortic PTHrP, a calcium-regulating hormone reported to inhibit VSMC calcification through depression of ALP. Therefore, downregulation of ALP by OPG could be mediated by blocking RANKL or via effects on calcium-regulating hormones.

Although experimental and animal studies suggest OPG exerts anti-calcification potential, OPG concentrations are elevated in patients with calcified vessels. Possible explanations can be found in interacting pathways altering the production of OPG, for example inflammation. Pro-inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α are able to induce OPG expression in VSMC and endothelial cells 15,66,83,84,85 but are also implicated in the development of vascular calcification by inducing ALP 75,86,87. In other words, agents that stimulate VSMC calcification may also stimulate OPG production, possibly as a protective mechanism attempting to counteract osteogenic or pro-apoptotic calcification mechanisms. Moreover, calcification itself in the form of calcium crystals internalised by macrophages stimulate the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines capable of simultaneously increasing OPG production and further enhancing osteogenic differentiation 26. Interestingly, for some factors such as oxidized lipids and cytokines, the net effect on calcification is positive in the artery wall while negative in bone by respectively stimulating and inhibiting the osteogenic differentiation of vascular and osteoblastic cells 88,90. In accordance, statins, which are reported to decrease TNF-induced OPG production in vascular cells 91, inhibit the calcification of vascular cells but paradoxically stimulate bone cell calcification 92. The mechanisms for these reverse effects on vascular and osteogenic cells are unclear but the involvement of the OPG/RANK/RANKL axis has been suggested 90. In contrast to bone, the vascular OPG/RANKL ratio increased in response to ovarectomy with a corresponding fourfold increase in arterial calcification 93. This suggests the importance of endocrine effects in the association of bone destruction and arterial mineralisation in postmenopausal women. Moreover since calcification is a well-know feature of atherosclerosis, the complex interactions involved will contribute to the net effect of the expression and actions of OPG in atherosclerotic calcification.

OPG and Vascular Disease

The origin of elevated OPG concentrations

The main potential sources of elevated OPG are summarised in figure 1. Since VSMC produce much higher amounts of OPG than endothelial cells 66 and are thought to play a significant role in the development of vascular calcification 64,65,94 , VSMC are thought to be the major vascular cell producing OPG in the diseased arterial wall. However the enormous surface of the endothelium ligning the circulation suggests endothelial cells are additional key cells involved in the production and release of circulating OPG in human serum. Reported close correlations between OPG and major cardiovascular risk factors such as age, HbA1c, waist-hip ratio, lipid profile, hypertension, homocysteine and hormone levels have been suggested to provide a partial explanation for the elevated serum OPG concentrations in cardiovascular disease 39,45,47,52,59,9599. However even after correction for conventional cardiovascular risk factors, serum OPG levels remained an independent risk factor for the incidence and severity of cardiovascular disease, vascular mortality, atherosclerosis, LV dysfunction and coronary calcification 39,47,49,62. The majority of clinical studies have reported the association of elevated serum OPG with higher levels of inflammation (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, fibrinogen) in the general population 39,49 as well as in CAD 28, diabetic 46,58,59 and rheumatoid arthritis patients 45. The ability of pro-inflammatory mediators such as TNFα, interleukin-1 and platelet-derived growth factor to enhance OPG expression and production in vascular cells may explain the association of OPG concentrations and cardiovascular diseases 15,66,8385. The suggestion that OPG is a marker of inflammation is supported by its downregulation by anti-inflammatory agents such as immunosuppressants, PPAR-γ ligands and anti-TNF therapy 63,100,101. As inflammation affects a whole range of other organs, it is likely that OPG production in other tissues is also influenced and may contribute to elevated serum OPG in chronic inflammatory diseases such as atherosclerosis.

Figure 1
The origin of increased OPG. The production of OPG in VSMC and endothelial cells is enhanced by inflammatory cytokines and may reflect endothelial dysfunction. Additionally, the failing myocardium, plaque rupture and other inflamed tissues could contribute ...

Improvements in endothelial function of treated diabetic patients were associated with the decrease in serum OPG levels and C-reactive protein supporting a link between endothelium, inflammation and OPG 58,59. Strong OPG immunostaining in the failing myocardium 34 as well as increased serum OPG levels in association with LV mass and function 62 and after heart failure 34,53 suggest an additional contribution of the myocardium to circulating OPG concentrations. Conversely, a recent study raised the possibility of a bidirectional OPG exchange by suggesting that elevated serum OPG levels augment OPG extraction by the heart and peripheral tissues 33.

Mediating role of elevated OPG in vascular disease

The role of OPG in cardiovascular disease is debated. The suggestion that increased OPG levels resulting from vascular damage represent a protective counter-regulatory mechanism is challenged by the fact that some of the actions of OPG/RANK/RANKL support a role in stimulating atherosclerosis progression and destabilisation (summarised in figure 2).

Figure 2
OPG as a mediator in vascular disease progression

In support of a beneficial vascular role for OPG is the recent finding of accelerated atherosclerotic lesion progression in OPG deficient mice 11. An athero-protective effect of OPG could be related to its anti-calcification function as described above. By interrupting the positive feedback loop between osteogenic differentiation and inflammatory cytokine production, OPG could help by retarding atherosclerotic progression 26. Moreover, acting as a soluble decoy receptor for RANKL and TRAIL, OPG blocks binding of these mediators to their cognate receptors and subsequent pro-inflammatory and pro-apoptotic events (reviewed by Collin-Osdoby et al.15). For example, OPG has been identified as an in vitro survival factor for endothelial cells in part by blocking TRAIL-induced apoptosis 102,103. Although this may protect against endothelial injury, the role of OPG and TRAIL in VSMC apoptosis is less clear and controversial. Apoptotic death of VSMC has been proposed as a mechanism of plaque destabilisation due to VSMC depletion and insufficient apoptotic cell clearance 19,12,104,105. Some studies support a protective role for OPG against VSMC apoptosis by acting as a VSMC survival factor 11 and blocking induced VSMC apoptosis by TRAIL expressing T-cells 19. In contrast, other studies report an opposite effect of OPG enhancing VSMC apoptosis 56 and TRAIL stimulating VSMC survival 106108. In addition, OPG may inhibit the potential anti-inflammatory activity of TRAIL-induced apoptosis by targeting infiltrating macrophages 107

OPG also influences production of other agents important in plaque stability such as matrix metalloproteinases. Incubation of VSMC and monocytic cells with OPG stimulated the expression of matrix metalloproteinases associated with matrix degradation as well as the production of interleukin-6 36,56. Other mechanisms supporting a pro-atherosclerotic role for OPG include its ability to in vitro enhance the expression of endothelial cell adhesion molecules and subsequent infiltration of leukocytes and monocytic cells 109,110,111. Furthermore, OPG might contribute to endothelial dysfunction by blocking RANKL signalling which is able to activate protective intracellular endothelial pathways such as the nitric oxide synthase pathway 112. The early impairment of nitric oxide release is a key feature of endothelial dysfunction which invariably precedes permanent vascular alterations 113. These finding could at least partly account for the relation between increased OPG serum levels with symptomatic and unstable cardiovascular disease.

Concluding remarks

Clearly, the vascular role of OPG is multifaceted and depends on the interplay with its ligands, RANKL and TRAIL, and a bidirectional modulation involving osteogenic, inflammatory and apoptotic responses.

Animal studies generally favour a protective role of OPG, particularly in terms of vascular calcification. At least a minimal amount of endogenous arterial OPG seems necessary to protect against vascular calcification. In addition to inhibiting apoptotic passive calcification, the ability of OPG to inhibit ALP-mediated osteogenic differentiation of vascular cells is also likely to contribute to the protective role of OPG.

On the other hand, elevated serum concentrations of OPG are found in a range of cardiovascular pathologies, suggesting the potential value of OPG as a biomarker of vascular risk and prognosis. Cellular studies have suggested a number of mechanisms by which such elevated concentrations of OPG could promote the progression and instability of atherosclerosis. Further animal studies of tissue-specific ablation or over-expression of OPG would be helpful to clarify the dilemma whether OPG has a dual, protective or detrimental effect on atherosclerosis development and progression.

Acknowledgments

Funding

National Institute of Health, USA (RO1 HL080010-01)

Research Advanced Program faculty grant from James Cook University (Townsville, Australia).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Bagger YZ, Tanko LB, Alexandersen P, et al. Radiographic measure of aorta calcification is a site-specific predictor of bone loss and fracture risk at the hip. J Intern Med. 2006;259:598–605. [PubMed]
2. Hak AE, Pols HA, van Hemert AM, et al. Progression of aortic calcification is associated with metacarpal bone loss during menopause: a population-based longitudinal study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:1926–1931. [PubMed]
3. Kiel DP, Kauppila LI, Cupples LA, et al. Bone loss and the progression of abdominal aortic calcification over a 25 year period: the Framingham Heart Study. Calcif Tissue Int. 2001;68:271–276. [PubMed]
4. Schulz E, Arfai K, Liu X, et al. Aortic calcification and the risk of osteoporosis and fractures. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:4246–4253. [PubMed]
5. Tanko LB, Bagger YZ, Christiansen C. Low bone mineral density in the hip as a marker of advanced atherosclerosis in elderly women. Calcif Tissue Int. 2003;73:15–20. [PubMed]
6. Simonet WS, Lacey DL, Dunstan CR, et al. Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density. Cell. 1997;89:309–319. [PubMed]
7. Tsuda E, Goto M, Mochizuki S, et al. Isolation of a novel cytokine from human fibroblasts that specifically inhibits osteoclastogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;234:137–142. [PubMed]
8. Yasuda H, Shima N, Nakagawa N, et al. Osteoclast differentiation factor is a ligand for osteoprotegerin/osteoclastogenesis-inhibitory factor and is identical to TRANCE/RANKL. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:3597–3602. [PubMed]
9. Bucay N, Sarosi I, Dunstan CR, et al. osteoprotegerin-deficient mice develop early onset osteoporosis and arterial calcification. Genes Dev. 1998;12:1260–1268. [PubMed]
10. Sattler AM, Schoppet M, Schaefer JR, et al. Novel aspects on RANK ligand and osteoprotegerin in osteoporosis and vascular disease. Calcif Tissue Int. 2004;74:103–106. [PubMed]
11. Bennett BJ, Scatena M, Kirk EA, et al. Osteoprotegerin inactivation accelerates advanced atherosclerotic lesion progression and calcification in older ApoE-/- mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:2117–2124. [PubMed]
12. Kiechl S, Werner P, Knoflach M, et al. The osteoprotegerin/RANK/RANKL system: a bone key to vascular disease. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2006;4:801–811. [PubMed]
13. Kong YY, Yoshida H, Sarosi I, et al. OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis. Nature. 1999;397:315–323. [PubMed]
14. Lacey DL, Timms E, Tan HL, et al. Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell. 1998;93:165–176. [PubMed]
15. Collin-Osdoby P. Regulation of vascular calcification by osteoclast regulatory factors RANKL and osteoprotegerin. Circ Res. 2004;95:1046–1057. [PubMed]
16. Schoppet M, Preissner KT, Hofbauer LC. RANK ligand and osteoprotegerin: paracrine regulators of bone metabolism and vascular function. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22:549–553. [PubMed]
17. Emery JG, McDonnell P, Burke MB, et al. Osteoprotegerin is a receptor for the cytotoxic ligand TRAIL. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:14363–14367. [PubMed]
18. Gochuico BR, Zhang J, Ma BY, et al. TRAIL expression in vascular smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2000;278:L1045–L1050. [PubMed]
19. Sato K, Niessner A, Kopecky SL, et al. TRAIL-expressing T cells induce apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells in the atherosclerotic plaque. J Exp Med. 2006;203:239–250. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Walsh MC, Choi Y. Biology of the TRANCE axis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2003;14:251–263. [PubMed]
21. Yun TJ, Tallquist MD, Aicher A, et al. Osteoprotegerin, a crucial regulator of bone metabolism, also regulates B cell development and function. J Immunol. 2001;166:1482–1491. [PubMed]
22. Min H, Morony S, Sarosi I, et al. Osteoprotegerin reverses osteoporosis by inhibiting endosteal osteoclasts and prevents vascular calcification by blocking a process resembling osteoclastogenesis. J Exp Med. 2000;192:463–474. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Orita Y, Yamamoto H, Kohno N, et al. Role of osteoprotegerin in arterial calcification: development of new animal model. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:2058–2064. [PubMed]
24. Price PA, June HH, Buckley JR, et al. Osteoprotegerin inhibits artery calcification induced by warfarin and by vitamin D. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21:1610–1616. [PubMed]
25. Morony S, Tintut Y, Zhang Z, et al. Osteoprotegerin inhibits vascular calcification without affecting atherosclerosis in ldlr(-/-) mice. Circulation. 2008;117:411–420. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Nadra I, Mason JC, Philippidis P, et al. Proinflammatory activation of macrophages by basic calcium phosphate crystals via protein kinase C and MAP kinase pathways: a vicious cycle of inflammation and arterial calcification? Circ Res. 2005;96:1248–1256. [PubMed]
27. Jono S, Ikari Y, Shioi A, et al. Serum osteoprotegerin levels are associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2002;106:1192–1194. [PubMed]
28. Rhee EJ, Lee WY, Kim SY, et al. Relationship of serum osteoprotegerin levels with coronary artery disease severity, left ventricular hypertrophy and C-reactive protein. Clin Sci (Lond) 2005;108:237–243. [PubMed]
29. Schoppet M, Sattler AM, Schaefer JR, et al. Increased osteoprotegerin serum levels in men with coronary artery disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:1024–1028. [PubMed]
30. Ohmori R, Momiyama Y, Taniguchi H, et al. Association between osteoprotegerin gene polymorphism and coronary artery disease in Japanese men. Atherosclerosis. 2006;187:215–217. [PubMed]
31. Soufi M, Schoppet M, Sattler AM, et al. Osteoprotegerin gene polymorphisms in men with coronary artery disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:3764–3768. [PubMed]
32. Ziegler S, Kudlacek S, Luger A, et al. Osteoprotegerin plasma concentrations correlate with severity of peripheral artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 2005;182:175–180. [PubMed]
33. Helske S, Kovanen PT, Lindstedt KA, et al. Increased circulating concentrations and augmented myocardial extraction of osteoprotegerin in heart failure due to left ventricular pressure overload. Eur J Heart Fail. 2007;9:357–363. [PubMed]
34. Ueland T, Yndestad A, Oie E, et al. Dysregulated osteoprotegerin/RANK ligand/RANK axis in clinical and experimental heart failure. Circulation. 2005;111:2461–2468. [PubMed]
35. Golledge J, McCann M, Mangan S, et al. Osteoprotegerin and osteopontin are expressed at high concentrations within symptomatic carotid atherosclerosis. Stroke. 2004;35:1636–1641. [PubMed]
36. Sandberg WJ, Yndestad A, Oie E, et al. Enhanced T-cell expression of RANK ligand in acute coronary syndrome: possible role in plaque destabilization. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:857–863. [PubMed]
37. Kadoglou NP, Gerasimidis T, Golemati S, et al. The relationship between serum levels of vascular calcification inhibitors and carotid plaque vulnerability. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:55–62. [PubMed]
38. Crisafulli A, Micari A, Altavilla D, et al. Serum levels of osteoprotegerin and RANKL in patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction. Clin Sci (Lond) 2005;109:389–395. [PubMed]
39. Abedin M, Omland T, Ueland T, et al. Relation of Osteoprotegerin to Coronary Calcium and Aortic Plaque (from the Dallas Heart Study) Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:513–518. [PubMed]
40. Barreto DV, Barreto FC, Carvalho AB, et al. Coronary calcification in hemodialysis patients: the contribution of traditional and uremia-related risk factors. Kidney Int. 2005;67:1576–1582. [PubMed]
41. Nitta K, Akiba T, Uchida K, et al. Serum osteoprotegerin levels and the extent of vascular calcification in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19:1886–1889. [PubMed]
42. Nitta K, Akiba T, Uchida K, et al. The progression of vascular calcification and serum osteoprotegerin levels in patients on long-term hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42:303–309. [PubMed]
43. Gogo PB, Jr, Schneider DJ, Terrien EF, et al. Osteoprotegerin is not associated with angiographic coronary calcification. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2006;22:177–183. [PubMed]
44. Clancy P, Oliver L, Jayalath R, et al. Assessment of a serum assay for quantification of abdominal aortic calcification. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:2574–2576. [PubMed]
45. Asanuma Y, Chung CP, Oeser A, et al. Serum osteoprotegerin is increased and independently associated with coronary-artery atherosclerosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Atherosclerosis. 2007;195:e135–e141. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Kim SM, Lee J, Ryu OH, et al. Serum osteoprotegerin levels are associated with inflammation and pulse wave velocity. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2005;63:594–598. [PubMed]
47. Anand DV, Lahiri A, Lim E, et al. The relationship between plasma osteoprotegerin levels and coronary artery calcification in uncomplicated type 2 diabetic subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1850–1857. [PubMed]
48. Anand DV, Lim E, Darko D, et al. Determinants of progression of coronary artery calcification in type 2 diabetes role of glycemic control and inflammatory/vascular calcification markers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:2218–2225. [PubMed]
49. Kiechl S, Schett G, Wenning G, et al. Osteoprotegerin is a risk factor for progressive atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2004;109:2175–2180. [PubMed]
50. Browner WS, Lui LY, Cummings SR. Associations of serum osteoprotegerin levels with diabetes, stroke, bone density, fractures, and mortality in elderly women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:631–637. [PubMed]
51. Morena M, Terrier N, Jaussent I, et al. Plasma osteoprotegerin is associated with mortality in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:262–270. [PubMed]
52. Rasmussen LM, Tarnow L, Hansen TK, et al. Plasma osteoprotegerin levels are associated with glycaemic status, systolic blood pressure, kidney function and cardiovascular morbidity in type 1 diabetic patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154:75–81. [PubMed]
53. Avignon A, Sultan A, Piot C, et al. Osteoprotegerin: a novel independent marker for silent myocardial ischemia in asymptomatic diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:2934–2939. [PubMed]
54. Ueland T, Jemtland R, Godang K, et al. Prognostic value of osteoprotegerin in heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1970–1976. [PubMed]
55. Omland T, Ueland T, Jansson AM, et al. Circulating osteoprotegerin levels and long-term prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:627–633. [PubMed]
56. Moran CS, McCann M, Karan M, et al. Association of osteoprotegerin with human abdominal aortic aneurysm progression. Circulation. 2005;111:3119–3125. [PubMed]
57. Shin JY, Shin YG, Chung CH. Elevated serum osteoprotegerin levels are associated with vascular endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1664–1666. [PubMed]
58. Xiang GD, Sun HL, Zhao LS, et al. [Changes of osteoprotegerin before and after insulin therapy in type 1 diabetic patients] Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007;87:1234–1237. [PubMed]
59. Xiang GD, Xu L, Zhao LS, et al. The relationship between plasma osteoprotegerin and endothelium-dependent arterial dilation in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2006;55:2126–2131. [PubMed]
60. Golledge J, Leicht AS, Crowther RG, et al. Determinants of Endothelial Function in a Cohort of Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease. Cardiology. 2008;111:51–56. [PubMed]
61. Siepi D, Marchesi S, Vaudo G, et al. Preclinical vascular damage in white postmenopausal women: the relevance of osteoprotegerin. Metabolism. 2008;57:321–325. [PubMed]
62. Omland T, Drazner MH, Ueland T, et al. Plasma osteoprotegerin levels in the general population: relation to indices of left ventricular structure and function. Hypertension. 2007;49:1392–1398. [PubMed]
63. Hofbauer LC, Shui C, Riggs BL, et al. Effects of immunosuppressants on receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand and osteoprotegerin production by human osteoblastic and coronary artery smooth muscle cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;280:334–339. [PubMed]
64. Schoppet M, Al-Fakhri N, Franke FE, et al. Localization of osteoprotegerin, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, and receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand in Monckeberg’s sclerosis and atherosclerosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:4104–4112. [PubMed]
65. Dhore CR, Cleutjens JP, Lutgens E, et al. Differential expression of bone matrix regulatory proteins in human atherosclerotic plaques. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21:1998–2003. [PubMed]
66. Olesen P, Ledet T, Rasmussen LM. Arterial osteoprotegerin: increased amounts in diabetes and modifiable synthesis from vascular smooth muscle cells by insulin and TNF-alpha. Diabetologia. 2005;48:561–568. [PubMed]
67. Kaden JJ, Bickelhaupt S, Grobholz R, et al. Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand and osteoprotegerin regulate aortic valve calcification. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2004;36:57–66. [PubMed]
68. Schoppet M, Ruppert V, Hofbauer LC, et al. TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and its decoy receptor osteoprotegerin in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;338:1745–1750. [PubMed]
69. Hofbauer LC, Brueck CC, Shanahan CM, et al. Vascular calcification and osteoporosis--from clinical observation towards molecular understanding. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18:251–259. [PubMed]
70. Proudfoot D, Skepper JN, Hegyi L, et al. Apoptosis regulates human vascular calcification in vitro: evidence for initiation of vascular calcification by apoptotic bodies. Circ Res. 2000;87:1055–1062. [PubMed]
71. Bostrom K, Watson KE, Horn S, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein expression in human atherosclerotic lesions. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:1800–1809. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
72. Hui M, Tenenbaum HC. New face of an old enzyme: alkaline phosphatase may contribute to human tissue aging by inducing tissue hardening and calcification. Anat Rec. 1998;253:91–94. [PubMed]
73. Kaden JJ, Bickelhaupt S, Grobholz R, et al. Expression of bone sialoprotein and bone morphogenetic protein-2 in calcific aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis. 2004;13:560–566. [PubMed]
74. Shanahan CM, Proudfoot D, Tyson KL, et al. Expression of mineralisation-regulating proteins in association with human vascular calcification. Z Kardiol. 2000;89 Suppl 2:63–68. [PubMed]
75. Shioi A, Katagi M, Okuno Y, et al. Induction of bone-type alkaline phosphatase in human vascular smooth muscle cells: roles of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and oncostatin M derived from macrophages. Circ Res. 2002;91:9–16. [PubMed]
76. Eghbali-Fatourechi GZ, Lamsam J, Fraser D, et al. Circulating osteoblast-lineage cells in humans. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1959–1966. [PubMed]
77. Eghbali-Fatourechi GZ, Modder UI, Charatcharoenwitthaya N, et al. Characterization of circulating osteoblast lineage cells in humans. Bone. 2007;40:1370–1377. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
78. Khosla S, Eghbali-Fatourechi GZ. Circulating cells with osteogenic potential. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1068:489–497. [PubMed]
79. Simionescu A, Simionescu DT, Vyavahare NR. Osteogenic Responses in Fibroblasts Activated by Elastin Degradation Products and Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1. Role of Myofibroblasts in Vascular Calcification. Am J Pathol. 2007 [PubMed]
80. Bostrom KI. Cell differentiation in vascular calcification. Z Kardiol. 2000;89 Suppl 2:69–74. [PubMed]
81. Iyemere VP, Proudfoot D, Weissberg PL, et al. Vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic plasticity and the regulation of vascular calcification. J Intern Med. 2006;260:192–210. [PubMed]
82. Steitz SA, Speer MY, Curinga G, et al. Smooth muscle cell phenotypic transition associated with calcification: upregulation of Cbfa1 and downregulation of smooth muscle lineage markers. Circ Res. 2001;89:1147–1154. [PubMed]
83. Hofbauer LC, Schoppet M. Clinical implications of the osteoprotegerin/RANKL/RANK system for bone and vascular diseases. Jama. 2004;292:490–495. [PubMed]
84. Zhang J, Fu M, Myles D, et al. PDGF induces osteoprotegerin expression in vascular smooth muscle cells by multiple signal pathways. FEBS Lett. 2002;521:180–184. [PubMed]
85. Collin-Osdoby P, Rothe L, Anderson F, et al. Receptor activator of NF-kappa B and osteoprotegerin expression by human microvascular endothelial cells, regulation by inflammatory cytokines, and role in human osteoclastogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:20659–20672. [PubMed]
86. Tintut Y, Patel J, Parhami F, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha promotes in vitro calcification of vascular cells via the cAMP pathway. Circulation. 2000;102:2636–2642. [PubMed]
87. Tintut Y, Patel J, Territo M, et al. Monocyte/macrophage regulation of vascular calcification in vitro. Circulation. 2002;105:650–655. [PubMed]
88. Mody N, Parhami F, Sarafian TA, et al. Oxidative stress modulates osteoblastic differentiation of vascular and bone cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2001;31:509–519. [PubMed]
89. Parhami F, Morrow AD, Balucan J, et al. Lipid oxidation products have opposite effects on calcifying vascular cell and bone cell differentiation. A possible explanation for the paradox of arterial calcification in osteoporotic patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:680–687. [PubMed]
90. Tintut Y, Demer L. Role of osteoprotegerin and its ligands and competing receptors in atherosclerotic calcification. J Investig Med. 2006;54:395–401. [PubMed]
91. Ben-Tal Cohen E, Hohensinner PJ, Kaun C, et al. Statins decrease TNF-alpha-induced osteoprotegerin production by endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells in vitro. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007;73:77–83. [PubMed]
92. Wu B, Elmariah S, Kaplan FS, et al. Paradoxical effects of statins on aortic valve myofibroblasts and osteoblasts: implications for end-stage valvular heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:592–597. [PubMed]
93. Choi BG, Vilahur G, Cardoso L, et al. Ovariectomy increases vascular calcification via the OPG/RANKL cytokine signalling pathway. Eur J Clin Invest. 2008 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
94. Al-Fakhri N, Hofbauer LC, Preissner KT, et al. Expression of bone-regulating factors osteoprotegerin (OPG) and receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL) in heterotopic vascular ossification. Thromb Haemost. 2005;94:1335–1337. [PubMed]
95. Gannage-Yared MH, Fares F, Semaan M, et al. Circulating osteoprotegerin is correlated with lipid profile, insulin sensitivity, adiponectin and sex steroids in an ageing male population. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2006;64:652–658. [PubMed]
96. Oh ES, Rhee EJ, Oh KW, et al. Circulating osteoprotegerin levels are associated with age, waist-to-hip ratio, serum total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in healthy Korean women. Metabolism. 2005;54:49–54. [PubMed]
97. Szulc P, Hofbauer LC, Heufelder AE, et al. Osteoprotegerin serum levels in men: correlation with age, estrogen, and testosterone status. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:3162–3165. [PubMed]
98. Kudlacek S, Schneider B, Woloszczuk W, et al. Serum levels of osteoprotegerin increase with age in a healthy adult population. Bone. 2003;32:681–686. [PubMed]
99. Knudsen ST, Foss CH, Poulsen PL, et al. Increased plasma concentrations of osteoprotegerin in type 2 diabetic patients with microvascular complications. Eur J Endocrinol. 2003;149:39–42. [PubMed]
100. Fu M, Zhang J, Lin YgY, et al. Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma inhibits osteoprotegerin gene expression in human aortic smooth muscle cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;294:597–601. [PubMed]
101. Ziolkowska M, Kurowska M, Radzikowska A, et al. High levels of osteoprotegerin and soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand in serum of rheumatoid arthritis patients and their normalization after anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:1744–1753. [PubMed]
102. Malyankar UM, Scatena M, Suchland KL, et al. Osteoprotegerin is an alpha vbeta 3-induced, NF-kappa B-dependent survival factor for endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:20959–20962. [PubMed]
103. Pritzker LB, Scatena M, Giachelli CM. The role of osteoprotegerin and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in human microvascular endothelial cell survival. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:2834–2841. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
104. Bennett MR, Evan GI, Schwartz SM. Apoptosis of human vascular smooth muscle cells derived from normal vessels and coronary atherosclerotic plaques. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:2266–2274. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
105. Tabas I. Consequences and therapeutic implications of macrophage apoptosis in atherosclerosis: the importance of lesion stage and phagocytic efficiency. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:2255–2264. [PubMed]
106. Secchiero P, Zerbinati C, Rimondi E, et al. TRAIL promotes the survival, migration and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004;61:1965–1974. [PubMed]
107. Secchiero P, Candido R, Corallini F, et al. Systemic tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand delivery shows antiatherosclerotic activity in apolipoprotein E-null diabetic mice. Circulation. 2006;114:1522–1530. [PubMed]
108. Kavurma MM, Schoppet M, Bobryshev YV, et al. Trail stimulates proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells via activation of NF-kappa B and induction of insulinlike growth factor-1 receptor. J Biol Chem. 2008 [PubMed]
109. Mangan SH, Campenhout AV, Rush C, et al. Osteoprotegerin upregulates endothelial cell adhesion molecule response to tumor necrosis factor-alpha associated with induction of angiopoietin-2. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;76:494–505. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
110. Zauli G, Corallini F, Bossi F, et al. Osteoprotegerin increases leukocyte adhesion to endothelial cells both in vitro and in vivo. Blood. 2007;110:536–543. [PubMed]
111. Mosheimer BA, Kaneider NC, Feistritzer C, et al. Syndecan-1 is involved in osteoprotegerin-induced chemotaxis in human peripheral blood monocytes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:2964–2971. [PubMed]
112. Secchiero P, Corallini F, Pandolfi A, et al. An increased osteoprotegerin serum release characterizes the early onset of diabetes mellitus and may contribute to endothelial cell dysfunction. Am J Pathol. 2006;169:2236–2244. [PubMed]
113. Landmesser U, Hornig B, Drexler H. Endothelial function: a critical determinant in atherosclerosis? Circulation. 2004;109:II27–II33. [PubMed]