Based on our microarray dataset, we chose to determine the in-depth role of three molecules in the pathogenesis of ECM in mice. First, our results demonstrate that the CD14 molecule plays a key role as a mediator of the pathogenesis of ECM. In earlier studies, the presence of elevated levels of soluble CD14 in serum from patients with complicated
P. falciparum malaria has been reported
[34]. Consistent with these findings, induction of CD14 transcription in brain tissue of susceptible mice exhibiting symptoms of ECM has recently been described by our group. In this microarray study, transcription of ECM was increased by 2.7±0.1 and 6.2±0.9 fold during ECM compared to BALB/c resistant and C57BL/6 non-moribund mice, respectively
[11]. Further investigation in mice deficient for the CD14 gene revealed that loss of CD14 had a dual effect following infection with
Pb-A parasites. First, CD14-deficient mice were highly resistant to ECM (only 21% of CD14-KO versus 80% of WT mice developed ECM, p<0.0004) () and secondly, loss of ECM associated with a significantly reduced parasite burden throughout the course of
Pb-A infection in CD14-KO mice (). Curiously, our data showing that loss of CD14 molecule associated with protection from ECM is somewhat in conflict with a previous study
[40] in which 100% of mice deficient for the CD14 gene developed fatal ECM within 6 to 8 days after infection with 10
6 P. berghei ANKA-parasitized RBCs. The reason behind the inconsistent findings as reported here and in the earlier study is not clear. However, we would like to emphasize that while our results are based on two independent ECM studies that involved a total of 19 CD14-KO mice, the study by Togbe
et al [40] used only 7 CD14-KO mice in two independent experiments. Although the CD14-KO mice used in our study and the Togbe
et al study were derived from the same genetic stock
[41], it is possible that the CD14-KO strains used in the two studies differ in a subtle way that needs to be further examined. One such subtle difference is that the Togbe
et al study utilized CD14-KO mice that were backcrossed at least ten times on the C57BL/6 genetic background while the CD14-KO mice used in our study (N
7F
14N
1 mice) were backcrossed eight times. Differences in the
Pb-A parasite lines could also account for the discrepant results between the two studies. Green fluorescent protein transgenic parasites derived from the cl15cy1 clone of
Pb-A were used in the Togbe
et al study while in this study, we used an uncloned line of
Pb-A parasites that had undergone no genetic manipulation. Additional studies using a large sample size of mice will enhance our knowledge of the role of CD14 in ECM. Nonetheless, we have noted that in agreement with our results, Togbe
et al also find that compared to WT C57BL/6 mice, CD14-KO mice had a more than two-fold reduction in parasite burden on day 7 post-
Pb-A infection. In their study, parasite burden was not reported for the entire course of
Pb-A infection.
CD14 exerts it pro-inflammatory action by acting as an accessory molecule for TLRs
[42],
[43]. Recent studies have shown that malaria GPI and hemozoin are ligands for TLR2 and TLR9, respectively
[44],
[45]. However, studies investigating the role of TLR signaling pathways in the pathogenesis of ECM are conflicting. In a study conducted by Coban
et al, TLR2
−/− and TLR9
−/− mice, but not TLR4
−/−, TLR5
−/−, and TLR7
−/− mice, were significantly protected from ECM
[46]. Griffith
et al demonstrated that TLR9
−/− mice, but not TLR2
−/− and TLR4
−/− mice, were partially protected from ECM
[47]. In contrast, Togbe
et al. found that TLR2
−/− and TLR9
−/− mice, as well as TLR3
−/−, TLR4
−/−, TLR6
−/−, and TLR7
−/− mice, were as sensitive to ECM as WT mice
[40]. In agreement with Togbe
et al, a study employing triple knockout mice found that the survival rates of TLR2/4/9
−/− mice were comparable to WT mice after
Pb-A infection
[48]. While our study does not differentiate between the TLR-dependent and TLR-independent roles of CD14, on the whole the above considerations are not inconsistent with CD14 acting via the TLR signaling pathways in ECM.
An unexpected result of this study was that loss of CD14 had an adverse effect on parasite growth in C57BL/6 mice. Mean parasite burden was approximately 2-fold lower (days 6 to 8 post-infection) and 3.6-fold lower (days 9 to 13 post-infection) in CD14-KO mice compared to WT mice (). Importantly, resistance of CD14-KO mice to ECM was parasitemia dependent; the few CD14-KO mice that developed ECM had a parasite burden comparable to WT mice (). Interestingly, this is not the first study to report the ability of CD14-deficient mice to control a pathogen burden more efficiently than WT mice. In a study conducted by Haziot
et al, CD14-deficient mice were not only resistant to a lethal challenge (5×10
6 cfu) of
Escherichia coli 0111:B4, but also had a 27-fold lower level of bacteremia in the blood
[49]. This increased clearance of
E. coli by CD14-deficient mice was attributed to a rapid infiltration of neutrophils (PMNs) in the peritoneal cavity that was significantly delayed in normal mice
[50]. It is important to note that neutrophils have been shown to phagocytose and kill malaria parasites
in vitro [51]–
[53]. Nonetheless, further studies are needed to determine the mechanism of CD14 dependent regulation of
Pb-A parasite density. Regardless of the mechanism, a therapeutic agent that targets CD14 could potentially be useful in preventing CM while simultaneously lowering parasite burden. Importantly, administration of human recombinant soluble CD14 (rsCD14) that might compete with CD14 receptor significantly protected mice from LPS-induced mortality
[54].
We have also demonstrated that galectin-3 protein is overexpressed in mice exhibiting symptoms of ECM () and deletion of the galectin-3 gene confers partial but significant (p<0.0073) protection from ECM in C57BL/6 mice challenged with
Pb-A (). To our knowledge, this is the first study to address the role of galectin-3 in the pathogenesis of malaria. In previous studies, important and diverse roles have been assigned to galectin-3 during other protozoan parasite infections
[26],
[27],
[28]. Interestingly, in a study evaluating the role of galectin-3 in leishmaniasis, galectin-3 recognized lipophosphoglycan (LPG) of
L. major but not
L. donovani and this species-specific recognition of the polygalactose epitope of
L. major LPG resulted in cleavage of galectin-3 to a truncated form that is incapable of oligomerization, a prerequisite for the immunomodulatory activities of galectin-3
[29]. The authors proposed that truncation of galectin-3 during
L. major but not
L. donovani infection may account for differences in pathogenesis between the two species. A similar type of mechanism related to the processing of galectin-3 that is triggered by only a few
Plasmodium species might be a reason why not all malaria parasites cause the pathogenesis of CM in their respective hosts.
The above mentioned studies and our data provide evidence that galectin-3 can significantly alter the pathogenic course of a parasitic disease. In a majority of these infections, the role of galectin-3 appears to depend on direct interaction with the parasite. However our studies did not find any significant adherence of galectin-3 to schizont stage parasites () above background levels (). We speculate that rather than binding parasite moieties, the role of galectin-3 in ECM might result from its binding endogenous oligosaccharides on matrix proteins. Galectin-3 is predominantly expressed in macrophages
[23] and might be released upon lysis of brain-infiltrating macrophages. It has been observed that in galectin-3-KO mice, alternative macrophage activation induced by extracellular galectin-3 via IL-4/IL-13 is repressed
[55], suggesting that this pathway might be involved in the role of ECM. In light of the results obtained in the leishmaniasis study, we systemically surveyed the galectin-3 gene for SNPs in humans using the HAPMAP data (
http://www.hapmap.org). We discovered that this molecule contains one protein-coding SNP (rs4652, A/C) that shows a dramatic difference between sub-Saharan African and non-African populations (96% of chromosomes from the former show the C allele). This particular SNP maps to the N-terminal low-complexity region, which is unique to galectin-3 among members of the galectin family and is required for high avidity binding to multivalent glycoconjugates
[56]. This low complexity segment is required for multimerization of galectin-3
[57] and is predicted to adopt a potentially collagen-like structure as a consequence of its repeating pattern of glycines and prolines. Given that the A/C SNP produces a P/T substitution, it could affect the multimerization of galectin-3. Hence, the difference between the sub-Saharan African and non-African populations at this protein position might be a reflection of selection driven by malaria which is prevalent in the former. Thus, despite the only partial level of protection from the
lgals3 gene deletion, it might be useful to further investigate its role as a factor in CM pathogenesis.
We next chose to examine the costimulatory molecule OX40, a marker of both T cell activation and the generation of memory, during ECM. Histological examination of brain sections revealed that mice displaying symptoms of ECM strongly expressed OX40 on a subset of accumulating lymphoid cells in and adjacent to blood vessels in the brain (). OX40 was expressed on comparatively fewer cells in brain tissue of non-moribund mice () suggesting that expression of OX40 in the brain may correlate with disease progression. Although OX40 is more commonly expressed on the CD4
+ subset of T cells, expression has also been observed on CD8
+ T cells that are strongly activated
[58],
[59]. We measured expression of OX40 on T cell subsets in the brain by flow cytometry in order to determine whether OX40 is expressed on CD4
+ or CD8
+ T lymphocytes. In mice exhibiting symptoms of ECM, 13.68% and 84.34% of CD3
+ brain lymphocytes were CD4
+ and CD8
+ T cells, respectively (). However, we found that OX40 was expressed in the majority (74.30%) of CD4
+ T cells (). In contrast, only 7.59% of CD8
+ T cells co-expressed OX40 (), but due to the greater number of CD8
+ T cells in the brain, the absolute numbers of OX40
+CD4
+ and OX40
+CD8
+ T cells were similar.
While it is difficult to assess the pathogenic nature of CD4
+ T cells due to their early role in infection, the symptomatic effector phase of ECM is believed to be precipitated by perforin-mediated apoptosis of brain endothelial cells by pathogenic CD8
+ T cells
[6]. However, it is not known whether these pathogenic CD8
+ T cells are a heterogeneous population with multiple phenotypes or a small homogeneous population such as the OX40
+ subset of CD8
+ T cells accumulated in the brain vasculature characterized in this study. Future studies performed in mice deficient for OX40 will need to be performed to determine whether OX40 is necessary for the pathogenesis of ECM. Furthermore, kinetic analysis by
in vivo depletion of OX40 during different stages of
Pb-A infection may be useful in determining which subset of OX40
+ T cells could potentially be involved in disease.
We believe that by utilizing a combination of approaches including mining the dataset of transcriptionally altered genes that are specifically related to the pathogenesis of ECM and further investigations in gene knockout mice and immunohistology studies, we have identified three novel host molecules – CD14, galectin-3 and OX40 that may play a critical role in the pathogenesis of ECM. Further in depth studies in mice and comparative investigations of young children undergoing clinical symptoms of CM or experiencing asymptomatic malaria during P. falciparum infections will be required to firmly establish the role of these molecules in CM.