Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Science. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 August 14.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2726986

Neuronal Activity–Induced Gadd45b Promotes Epigenetic DNA Demethylation and Adult Neurogenesis


The mammalian brain exhibits diverse types of neural plasticity, including activity-dependent neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. How transient activation of mature neurons leads to long-lasting modulation of adult neurogenesis is unknown. Here we identify Gadd45b as a neural activity–induced immediate early gene in mature hippocampal neurons. Mice with Gadd45b deletion exhibit specific deficits in neural activity–induced proliferation of neural progenitors and dendritic growth of newborn neurons in the adult hippocampus. Mechanistically, Gadd45b is required for activity-induced DNA demethylation of specific promoters and expression of corresponding genes critical for adult neurogenesis, including brain-derived neurotrophic factor and fibroblast growth factor. Thus, Gadd45b links neuronal circuit activity to epigenetic DNA modification and expression of secreted factors in mature neurons for extrinsic modulation of neurogenesis in the adult brain.

Adult neurogenesis represents a prominent form of structural plasticity through continuous generation of new neurons in the mature mammalian brain (1, 2). Similar to other neural activity-induced plasticity with fine structural changes within individual neurons, adult neurogenesis is modulated by a plethora of external stimuli (1, 2). For example, synchronized activation of mature dentate neurons by electro-convulsive treatment (ECT) in adult mice causes sustained up-regulation of hippocampal neurogenesis (3) without any detectable cell damage (fig. S1). How transient activation of mature neuronal circuits modulates adult neurogenesis over days and weeks is largely unknown.

Epigenetic mechanisms potentially provide a basis for such long-lasting modulation (4). We examined the expression profiles of known epigenetic regulators in response to ECT, including those involved in chromatin modification (5). One gene that we found to be strongly induced by ECT was Gadd45b (Fig. 1A) (6), a member of the Gadd45 family previously implicated in DNA repair, adaptive immune response (710), and DNA 5-methylcytosine excision in cultured cells (11). We first characterized Gadd45b induction by neuronal activity in the adult hippocampus (5). Analysis of microdissected dentate gyrus tissue showed robust, transient induction of Gadd45b expression by a single ECT (Fig. 1A, fig. S2, and table S1). In situ analysis revealed induction largely in NeuN+ mature dentate granule cells (Fig. 1B and fig. S3). Spatial exploration of a novel environment, a behavioral paradigm that activates immediate early genes (IEGs) (12), also led to significant induction of Gadd45b, but not Gadd45a or Gadd45g (Fig. 1, C and D). Most Gadd45b-positive cells also expressed Arc (Fig. 1D) (88 ± 3%, n = 4), a classic activity-induced IEG. Thus, physiological stimulation is sufficient to induce Gadd45b expression in dentate granule cells. Experiments with pharmacological manipulations of primary hippocampal neurons further suggested that Gadd45b induction by activity requires the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR), Ca2+, and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase signaling (fig. S4 and supporting text). In vivo injection of the NMDAR antagonist +3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)-propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP) abolished ECT-induced Gadd45b and Arc expression in the adult dentate gryus (Fig. 1E). Together, these results suggest that Gadd45b shares the same induction pathway as classic activity-induced IEGs (13).

Fig. 1
Activity-induced neuronal Gadd45b expression. (A) Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) analysis of ECT-induced expression of Gadd45a, Gadd45b, and Gadd45g in the adult dentate gyrus after a single ECT. (B) Sample images of Gadd45b in situ hybridization ...

We next assessed whether Gadd45b induction is required for neural activity–dependent adult neurogenesis. Adult Gadd45b knockout (KO) (10) mice appeared anatomically normal (fig. S5) and exhibited identical NMDAR-dependent induction of known IEGs at 1 hour after ECT (Fig. 1E). To examine neural progenitor proliferation, adult mice at 3 days after ECT or sham treatment were injected with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and killed 2 hours later (5). Stereological counting showed similar densities of BrdU+ cells in the dentate gyrus between wild-type (WT) and KO mice without ECT (Fig. 2). After ECT, however, there was a 140% increase in the density of BrdU+ cells in WT mice and only a 40% increase in KO littermates (Fig. 2). Little caspase-3 activation was detected within the dentate gyrus under all these conditions (figs. S1 and S6), ruling out a potential contribution from cell death. To confirm this finding with a manipulation of better spatio-temporal control, we developed effective lentivi-ruses to reduce the expression of endogenous Gadd45b with short-hairpin RNA (shRNA) (fig. S7). Expression of shRNA-Gadd45b through stereotaxic viral injection largely abolished ECT-induced proliferation of adult neural progenitors, whereas the basal proliferation was similar to that of shRNA-control (fig. S7). We also examined exercise-induced adult neurogenesis, a physiological stimulation that induced a modest increase in Gadd45b expression (fig. S8A). A 7-day running program led to a marked increase of neural progenitor proliferation in adult WT mice, but was significantly less effective in their KO littermates (fig. S8B). Together, these results demonstrate a specific and essential role of Gadd45b in activity-induced, but not basal, proliferation of neural progenitors in the adult dentate gyrus.

Fig. 2
Essential role of Gadd45b in activity-induced proliferation of adult neural progenitors. (A) Sample projected confocal images of BrdU immunostaining (red) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Summary of stereological quantification of BrdU+ ...

We next examined the role of Gadd45b induction in the dendritic development of newborn neurons. Retroviruses expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) were stereotaxically injected into the dentate gyrus of adult WT and KO mice to label proliferating neural progenitors and their progeny (5, 14). A single ECT was given at 3 days after injection, when most GFP-labeled cells have already become postmitotic neurons (14). Quantitative analysis showed that ECT markedly increased the total dendritic length and complexity of GFP+ newborn neurons at 14 days after retro-viral labeling (Fig. 3). This ECT-induced dendritic growth was significantly attenuated in KO mice, whereas the basal level of dendritic growth was similar (Fig. 3). Thus, Gadd45b is also essential for activity-induced dendritic development of newborn neurons in the adult brain.

Fig. 3
Essential role of Gadd45b in activity-induced dendritic development of newborn neurons in the adult brain. (A) Sample projected Z-series confocal images of GFP+ dentate granule cells at 14 days after viral labeling. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Quantification ...

How does transient Gadd45b induction regulate activity-dependent adult neurogenesis over the long-term? Gadd45a has been implicated in promoting global DNA demethylation in cultured cells, yet the finding remains controversial (11, 15). To examine whether Gadd45b induction may confer long-lasting epigenetic modulation in the expression of neurogenic niche signals, we analyzed DNA methylation status using microdissected adult dentate tissue enriched in NeuN+ mature neurons (5). No significant global DNA demethylation was detected after ECT in vivo (figs. S9 and S10B and supporting text). We next used methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) analysis in a preliminary screen for region-specific DNA demethylation, with a focus on growth factor families that have been implicated in regulating adult neurogenesis (2). Significant demethylation was found at specific regulatory regions of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (Bdnf) and fibroblast growth factor–1 (Fgf-1) (fig. S10B). Bisulfite sequencing analysis further confirmed ECT-induced demethylation within the regulatory region IX of Bdnf (16) and the brain-specific promoter B of Fgf-1 (17) (Fig. 4, A and B; fig. S11 and table S2). Every CpG site within these regions exhibited a marked reduction in the frequency of methylation (Fig. 4A). Time-course analysis further revealed the temporal dynamics of DNA methylation status at these CpG sites (figs. S12 and S13). In contrast, no significant change was induced by ECT in the pluripotent cell-specific Oct4 promoter or the kidney and liver-specific Fgf-1G promoter (18) (Fig. 4B and fig. S11B). Comparison of adult Gadd45b WT and KO mice without ECT showed no significant difference in the basal levels of DNA methylation within Bdnf IX and Fgf-1B regulatory regions (Fig. 4B and fig. S14). In contrast, ECT-induced DNA demethylation of these regions was almost completely abolished in KO mice (Fig. 4, A and B, and figs. S10C and S11A). In addition, overexpression of Gadd45b appeared to promote DNA demethylation in vivo (Fig. 4C) and to activate methylation-silenced reporters in cultured postmitotic neurons (fig. S15). Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis further showed specific binding of Gadd45b to the Fgf-1B and Bdnf IX regulatory regions (fig. S16). ECT-induced gene expression from these regions and total expression of Bdnf and Fgf-1 were largely absent in Gadd45b KO mice at 4 hours (Fig. 4D and fig. S17), consistent with a critical role of DNA methylation status in regulating gene expression. Thus, Gadd45b is essential for activity-dependent demethylation and late-onset expression of specific secreted factors in the adult dentate gyrus.

Fig. 4
Essential role of Gadd45b in activity-induced specific DNA demethylation and gene expression in the adult dentate gyrus. (A and B) Bisulfite sequencing analysis of adult dentate gyrus tissue before or at 4 hours after ECT. (A) A schematic diagram of the ...

In summary, Gadd45b links neuronal circuit activity to region-specific DNA demethylation and expression of paracrine neurogenic niche factors from mature neurons in controlling key aspects of activity-dependent adult neurogenesis (fig. S18). As endogenous target of Gadd45b-dependent demethylation pathway, BDNF is known to promote dendritic growth of neurons in vivo, and FGF-1 exhibited as robust mitogenic activity as FGF-2 on neural progenitor proliferation in vitro (fig. S19). The presence of Gadd45b in chromatin associated with Bdnf IX and Fgf-1B regulatory regions in neurons (fig. S16) points to its direct role in gene regulation and potentially in a demethylation complex (fig. S18) (11, 19). The known role of the Gadd45 family in 5-methylcytosine excision (7, 8, 11) is consistent with the emerging notion that region-specific demethylation can be mediated through DNA repair–like mechanisms, as supported by genetic and biochemical studies in both Arabidopsis and mammalian cells (20, 21) (supporting text).

How transient neuronal activation achieves long-lasting effects in neural plasticity and memory has been a long-standing question; enzymatic modification of cytosine in DNA was proposed as a means to provide such necessary stability with reversibility (22). Although DNA demethylation can occur passively during cell division, emerging evidence suggests the existence of active demethylation in postmitotic cells (2325). DNA demethylation in neurons represents an extra layer of activity-dependent regulation, in addition to transcription factors and histone-modifying enzymes (13). Gadd45b expression is altered in some autistic patients (26) and is induced by light in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (27), by induction of long-term potentiation in vivo (28). Gadd45b is also associated with critical-period plasticity in the visual cortex (29). Thus, Gadd45b may represent a common target of physiological stimuli in different neurons in vivo, and mechanisms involving epigenetic DNA modification may be fundamental for activity-dependent neural plasticity.

Supplementary Material


References and Notes

1. Kempermann G, van Praag H, Gage FH. Prog Brain Res. 2000;127:35. [PubMed]
2. Ming GL, Song H. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005;28:223. [PubMed]
3. Madsen TM, et al. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;47:1043. [PubMed]
4. Jaenisch R, Bird A. Nat Genet. 2003;33(suppl):245. [PubMed]
5. Materials and methods and supporting data are available on Science Online
6. Ploski JE, Newton SS, Duman RS. J Neurochem. 2006;99:1122. [PubMed]
7. Jung HJ, et al. Oncogene. 2007;26:7517. [PubMed]
8. Tran H, et al. Science. 2002;296:530. [PubMed]
9. Hollander MC, Fornace AJ., Jr Oncogene. 2002;21:6228. [PubMed]
10. Lu B, Ferrandino AF, Flavell RA. Nat Immunol. 2004;5:38. [PubMed]
11. Barreto G, et al. Nature. 2007;445:671. [PubMed]
12. Ramirez-Amaya V, et al. J Neurosci. 2005;25:1761. [PubMed]
13. Flavell SW, Greenberg ME. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31:563. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Ge S, et al. Nature. 2006;439:589. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Jin SG, Guo C, Pfeifer GP. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000013. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Aid T, Kazantseva A, Piirsoo M, Palm K, Timmusk T. J Neurosci Res. 2007;85:525. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Alam KY, et al. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:30263. [PubMed]
18. Zhang Y, Madiai F, Hackshaw KV. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1521:45. [PubMed]
19. Cervoni N, Szyf M. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:40778. [PubMed]
20. Gehring M, et al. Cell. 2006;124:495. [PubMed]
21. Métivier R, et al. Nature. 2008;452:45. [PubMed]
22. Holliday R. J Theor Biol. 1999;200:339. [PubMed]
23. Martinowich K, et al. Science. 2003;302:890. [PubMed]
24. Weaver IC, et al. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:847. [PubMed]
25. Lubin FD, Roth TL, Sweatt JD. J Neurosci. 2008;28:10576. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Garbett K, et al. Neurobiol Dis. 2008;30:303. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Porterfield VM, Piontkivska H, Mintz EM. BMC Neurosci. 2007;8:98. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Hevroni D, et al. J Mol Neurosci. 1998;10:75. [PubMed]
29. Majdan M, Shatz CJ. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:650. [PubMed]
30. We thank D. Ginty, S. Synder, and members of Ming and Song laboratories for help and critical comments and L. Liu and Y. Cai for technical support. This work was supported by NIH, McKnight, and NARSAD (to H.S.) and by NIH, March of Dimes, and Johns Hopkins Brain Science Institute (to G-l.M.). R.A.F. is an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.