PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of wtpaEurope PMCEurope PMC Funders GroupSubmit a Manuscript
 
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Author manuscript; available in PMC Aug 13, 2009.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2726638
UKMSID: UKMS27495
Nucleotide dependent differences between the α-skeletal and α-cardiac actin isoforms
József Orbán, Dénes Lőrinczy, Miklós Nyitrai, and Gábor Hild*
University of Pécs, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biophysics, Pécs, Szigeti Str. 12, H-7624, Hungary
* Corresponding author. Fax: +36 72 536 261. gabor.hild/at/aok.pte.hu (G. Hild).
The thermodynamic properties of the actin filaments prepared from cardiomyocytes were investigated with differential scanning calorimetry. This method could distinguish between the α-cardiac and α-skeletal components of the actin filaments polymerised from ADP-actin monomers by their different melting temperatures (Tm). Similar separation was not possible with filaments polymerised from ATP-actin monomers. Further analyses revealed that the activation energy (Eact) was greater for filaments of α-skeletal actin than for α-cardiac actin monomers when the filaments were polymerised from ADP-actin monomers. These results showed that the α-cardiac actin filaments were thermodynamically less stable than the filaments of α-skeletal actin and their difference was nucleotide dependent. Based on these results and considering previous observations it was concluded that the existence of two actin isoforms and their nucleotide dependent conformational differences are part of the tuning regulatory mechanism by which the cardiac muscle cells can maintain their biological function under pathological conditions.
Keywords: Calorimetry, Thermodynamics, Stability, Nucleotides, Actin filament, Protein conformation
Actin is an important intracellular protein with versatile cellular functions [1-4]. In the heart muscle cells both α-cardiac and α-skeletal isoforms of actin can be found [5,6]. The contribution of the skeletal actin isoform in the cardiac muscle is 16–24% of the total actin [5,6]. The actin binds an ATP in complex with a divalent magnesium ion under physiological circumstances [7]. The ATP is hydrolysed during the polymerisation of the actin monomers and the filaments contain mainly ADP in their matured form [8]. The role of the nucleotide in the mechano-chemical properties of the actin filament was emphasized by Janmey and colleagues when they suggested that the energy utilized during the breakdown of the ATP could be stored in the protein [9]. The characterisation of the ADP-actin revealed a change in the subdomain structure and the dynamics of the protein as well [10,11]. Increased inter-monomer flexibility and decreased stiffness were observed when the actin filaments were polymerised from ADP-actin monomers [9,12].
The work of some actin-binding proteins (e.g. thymosin β4, ARP 2/3 and cofilin) in the cardiac muscle tissue is strongly influenced by the quality of the actin-bound nucleotide [13-15]. Based on the essential roles of the actin-binding proteins in the eukaryotic cells a detailed investigation of the different forms of their targeted actin isoforms is essential to understand the complex work of the cytoskeletal network. In the non-muscle cells the ATP concentration is influenced by several intracellular factors [16]. The cellular ATP depletion can be the consequence of hypoxia or mitochondrial dysfunction that can cause an increase in the concentration of the ADP-F-actin while the cells become more susceptible to apoptosis [16-18]. The ATP depletion inside the cardiac cells can be the consequence of ischemic cardiac diseases and other heart diseases as well [19].
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) is able to determine directly the global thermodynamic properties of a protein and reveal differences on the sub-molecular level as well [20]. In this work the thermodynamic features of actin filaments polymerised from ADP containing actin monomers of heart muscle cells were characterised with the method of differential scanning calorimetry. The measured Tm values and the determined activation energies indicated that the filaments of ADP-α-cardiac actin monomers were thermodynamically less stable than the actin filaments prepared from ADP-α-skeletal actin monomers. The difference disappeared when the filaments were polymerised from ATP-actin monomers. For both the α-cardiac and the α-skeletal isoforms the filaments were more stable when polymerised from ATP-actin monomers than those from ADP-actin. The observed nucleotide and isoform dependent differences in the conformation of the actin filaments may play important roles in the function of muscle cells.
Sample preparation
The cardiac actin was prepared from acetone powder of bovine heart muscle [21,22]. The calcium saturated actin monomers were stored in a 2 mM Mops buffer (pH 8.0) containing 0.2 mM ATP, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol and 0.005% NaN3. The concentration of the actin monomers was calculated by using the extinction coefficient of 0.63 mg-1 ml cm-1 at 290 nm [23]. The actin bound calcium was changed for magnesium by incubating the samples for 5 min in the presence of 0.2 mM EGTA and 0.1 mM MgCl2 at room temperature [24]. The exchange of the actin monomer bound ATP for ADP was done by incubating the actin for 1 h at 4 °C in the presence of 1.65 mg/ml hexokinase, 0.5 mg/ml glucose and 1 mM ADP [25]. The ADP-actin was polymerised for 12 h in the presence of 2 mM MgCl2 and 100 mM KCl. The polymerisation of actin was tested by using pyren-labelled actin in the ratio of 5% as described previously [26]. The excitation wavelength was 365 nm and the emission was monitored at 407 nm.
DSC measurements and theoretical considerations
The calorimetric measurements were performed with a SETARAM Micro DSC-II Calorimeter in the temperature range of 0–100 °C with a constant heating rate of 0.3 K/min. The actin concentration was 69 μM. To analyse the results we applied the method established by Sanchez-Ruiz and his colleagues [27]. Their analysis was based on a model that was created by Lumry and Eyring [28]. The Lumry–Eyring model was successfully applied previously to reveal the thermodynamic properties of actin in solution [29] and in muscle fibres as well [30]. They proposed that the irreversible protein denaturation can be interpreted with a two step kinetic model [28]. In this model a reversible denaturation step was followed by an irreversible one that could be described by a reaction scheme as:
equation M1
(1)
where N is the natural, D is the reversibly denatured and I is the irreversibly denatured form of the protein. The forward and backward rate constants of the reversible step are denoted as k+1 and k-1 while k2 appertain to the irreversible formation of the end product from the intermediate D form of the protein. Valuable thermodynamic information about the reversible unfolding can be obtained when the rate constant for the irreversible step (k2) is much smaller compared to the reversible step, or when the irreversible process takes place above the Tm value where the main thermodynamic conversion of the protein has occurred. The activation energy of the denaturation process can be related to the calorimetric enthalpy change:
equation M2
(2)
where R is the universal gas constant (8.314 J mol-1 K-1), EA is the activation energy and ΔH is the enthalpy change related to the T temperature [27,31]. The ΔH values were determined by calculating the under curve area until the temperature point of T. The activation energy can give information about the energy required to drive the protein through the thermal denaturation process.
Sample characterisation
Actin filaments prepared from the actin monomers of cardiac muscle cells were investigated with the method of DSC. Before the polymerisation process the ATP was replaced with ADP in the binding-pocket of the actin monomers (Fig. 1). The critical concentration of the ADP-actin is ~ 1 μM [32,33], therefore, the contribution of the ADP-actin monomers to the amount of the total actin was so small (<1.5%) that their effect on the calorimetric results was negligible under the applied conditions. Polymerisation tests confirmed that the α-cardiac ADP-actin monomers were able to polymerise, and the polymerisation was completed within the applied time frame (~12 h) (Fig. 2). The SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) could not reveal any contaminating proteins in the samples (inset in Fig. 2).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The ribbon model of the α-skeletal actin monomer from rabbit skeletal muscle. ATP (represented with balls in the middle) in the nucleotide-binding cleft is shown (Protein Data Bank: 1NWK).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The polymerisation curve of the ADP-actin from bovine cardiac tissue. The polymerisation was started by adjusting the MgCl2 concentration to 2 mM and the KCl concentration to 100 mM in the solution containing 69 μM actin (5% pyrene labelled). (more ...)
DSC results on ADP-actin filaments
DSC experiments were carried out on actin filaments polymerised from ADP-actin monomers. The actin was prepared from cardiac muscle cells. The denaturation curve indicated an endothermic transition, and was composed of two distinct peaks (Fig. 3). The Tm values corresponding to the two peaks were 56 ± 2 °C and 60 ± 2 °C. To analyse the results the measured heat transition curve was decomposed into two Gaussians (Fig. 3). Similar approach had been successfully applied previously for the analysis of complex heat absorption curves [34]. The Gaussian fit resolved the Tm values of 54.3 ± 0.5 °C and 60.0 ± 2.1 °C, which were close to those obtained without the decomposition. Based on the areas under the fitted Gaussians the peaks with the lower and the higher Tm values contributed by 88 ± 8% and 12 ± 8% to the total area of the heat absorption curve, respectively.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
DSC results on actin filaments. The DSC recording of α-actin filaments prepared from ADP containing actin monomers of the bovine cardiac tissue (○). The heat-flow* is representing the normalized version of the original heat-flow values (more ...)
We attempted to further analyse the DSC results by determining the activation energy (Eq. (2)) attributed to the denaturation process using a previously described method [27,28]. The peak with the higher Tm could not be analysed reliably because of its small size and the narrow temperature range it covered. The calculated activation energy for the first peak of the DSC curve was 254 ± 11 kJ mol-1 (Fig. 4). This value was smaller than the activation energy determined for the α-cardiac actin filaments from ATP-actin monomers (332 kJ mol-1) [35], or for α-skeletal actin filaments of ADP-actin (311 kJ mol-1, the data are also presented in Fig. 4) [29].
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Analysis of the DSC results. The calculation of the activation energy for actin filaments prepared from ATP (□) or ADP (○) containing actin monomers of the bovine cardiac tissue based on the method of Sanchez-Ruiz.
The comparison of the α-cardiac and α-skeletal actin isoforms
One of the characteristic features of the DSC results was the appearance of the two peaks in the heat absorption curve (Fig. 3). A possible explanation for this observation could be that the nucleotide exchange was not complete during the preparation of ADP-actin monomers, and the samples contained ATP-actin before the polymerisation. It is unlikely that the method fails to replace the bound ATP with ADP in the case of the α-cardiac actin isoform because the method of nucleotide exchange is well established, and was previously successfully used in many cases for skeletal actin [36].
An alternative explanation for the appearance of the two peaks is based on earlier observations that the actin from cardiac muscle contains α-skeletal actin (16–24%) as well [5,6]. The Tm value of 60 ± 2 °C we observed for the higher temperature peak is close to the value of 58.4 °C, which was obtained previously for the filaments polymerised from α-skeletal ADP-actin monomers [29]. The proximity of these values suggests that the higher temperature peak in Fig. 3 belongs to the α-skeletal part of the actin pool within the cardiac cells. To test this possibility we determined the contribution of the areas belonging to the two peaks of the recorded DSC curve. The contribution of the peak associated with the higher Tm value was similar to the α-skeletal actin content of the heart muscle cells (12 ± 8% vs. 16–24%) [5,6], which corroborates the conclusion that the higher temperature peak is attributed to α-skeletal actin. The appearance of the two peaks can also be caused by the differences in the thermodynamic properties of the different α-actin isoforms. Considering the Tm values it is possible to compare the thermodynamic stability of the different forms of proteins as the higher Tm value can be attributed to a thermodynamically more stable protein conformation [37,38]. The advantage of exploring the differences between the melting temperatures is that their position is largely independent of the applied thermodynamic model describing the process of the denaturation [39]. When the filaments were polymerised from ADP-actin monomers the lower Tm observed for α-cardiac actin filaments indicated that the protein conformation was thermodynamically less stable compared to the α-skeletal actin filaments. Analyses that were carried out according to the approach of Sanchez-Ruiz and colleagues [27] showed that the activation energy (Eact) was ~18 % smaller for the α-cardiac actin filaments (254 kJ mol-1; Fig. 4) than for the α-skeletal actin filaments (311 kJ mol-1) [29], when both of them were prepared from ADP-actin monomers. The larger energy requirement could be related to the more heat resistant protein matrix, which supports the conclusion that the α-cardiac actin filaments are thermodynamically less stable than α-skeletal actin filaments, when both are prepared from ADP-actin monomers.
The effect of nucleotide exchange on actin monomers
When the actin filaments were prepared from cardiac ATP-actin monomers only one peak was previously found with a Tm value of 62.17 °C [40], so the two isoforms within the cardiac actin pool were indistinguishable. This result can indicate that the conformational differences between the filaments of α-cardiac actin and α-skeletal actin are nucleotide dependent, so they can only be observed when the filaments are polymerised from ADP-actin monomers.
It is well known that α-skeletal actin filaments can generate a more stable and rigid conformation when they are prepared from ATP-actin monomers compared to the filaments prepared from ADP-actin monomers [9-12]. There was previously no report about such nucleotide dependence in the case of the α-cardiac actin isoform. The observation that the Tm value was lower for the actin filaments polymerised from α-cardiac ADP-actin monomers (54.3 ± 0.5 °C) than from cardiac ATP-actin monomers (62.17 °C) (Fig. 3) showed a thermodynamically less stable protein matrix when the actin filaments were prepared from ADP containing cardiac actin monomers. The calculated activation energy for the α-cardiac actin filaments was 254 ± 11 kJ mol-1 (Fig. 4). This value is smaller than the activation energy determined previously for the α-cardiac ATP-actin filaments (332 kJ mol-1) [35], and thus the difference between the calculated activation energy values gives an additional evidence (similarly to the case of α-skeletal actin) that the actin filaments prepared from α-cardiac ATP-actin monomers are thermodynamically more stable than the filaments prepared from α-cardiac ADP-actin monomers.
In this study the comparison of the α-actin isoforms revealed that the filaments of the α-skeletal actin were more resistant to heat denaturation than the α-cardiac filaments, when they were polymerised from ADP-actin monomers. This difference was not found in filaments polymerised from ATP-actin monomers, which indicates that the conformational differences between the isoforms were nucleotide dependent. The structure and the dynamics of proteins can be related to their biological functions [41-43]. The proper function of the cytoskeletal and sarcomeric proteins are essential for the normal work of the cardiomyocytes [44]. Previous observations revealed that the isoform content of cardiac muscle cells could vary under various circumstances [5]. In diseased heart increased α-skeletal/α-cardiac actin ratio was observed, which indicates that the altered stoichiometry of the actin isoforms can be a response to the altered demands against the cardiac muscle [6,45].
Our present results can assist to understand the molecular details behind the organisation of the actin filament pool in the cardiac muscle cells. It is reasonable to assume that the properties of the actin pool are optimal under physiological conditions. In this case the filaments are polymerised from ATP-actin monomers and their conformation seems to be isoform independent. The intracellular ATP depletion is a serious condition when the concentration of ADP-actin monomers is elevated. The filaments polymerised under these conditions from ADP-actin monomers are more flexible than those polymerised from ATP-actin monomers, so their conformation differs from their optimal physiological state. Although this fact is true for both α-skeletal and α-cardiac actin isoforms the change in the α-skeletal actin filaments is smaller due to the nucleotide dependent nature of the differences between the actin isoforms. The α-skeletal actin filaments remain more rigid, i.e. their conformation is more similar to the physiological state of them.
The elevated level of the α-skeletal actin isoform [6,45] can contribute to the tuning of the conformational properties of the total actin population. We can conclude that the existence of two actin isoforms and their nucleotide dependent conformational differences are part of the tuning regulatory mechanism by which the cardiac muscle cells can maintain their biological function under pathological conditions.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Professor Béla Somogyi for the support he produced during the preparation of this study. This work was supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and by grants from the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA Grant No. K60186 and K60968 (Miklós Nyitrai)). The SETARAM Micro DSC-II was purchased with a Grant (CO-272) from the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (Dénes Lőrinczy). Miklós Nyitrai holds a Wellcome Trust International Senior Research Fellowship in Biomedical Sciences.
[1] Chowdhury HH, Popoff MR, Zorec R. Actin cytoskeleton and exocytosis in rat melanotrophs. Pflugers Arch. 2000;439:R148–R149. [PubMed]
[2] Lamaze C, Fujimoto LM, Yin HL, Schmid SL. The actin cytoskeleton is required for receptor-mediated endocytosis in mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:20332–20335. [PubMed]
[3] Cossart P. Actin-based bacterial motility. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1995;7:94–101. [PubMed]
[4] Pelham RJ, Chang F. Actin dynamics in the contractile ring during cytokinesis in fission yeast. Nature. 2002;419:82–86. [PubMed]
[5] Vandekerckhove J, Bugaisky G, Buckingham M. Simultaneous expression of skeletal muscle and heart actin proteins in various striated muscle tissues and cells. A quantitative determination of the two actin isoforms. J. Biol. Chem. 1986;261:1838–1843. [PubMed]
[6] Bergen HR, 3rd, Ajtai K, Burghardt TP, Nepomuceno AI, Muddiman DC. Mass spectral determination of skeletal/cardiac actin isoform ratios in cardiac muscle. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003;17:1467–1471. [PubMed]
[7] Estes JE, Selden LA, Kinosian HJ, Gershman LC. Tightly-bound divalent cation of actin. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 1992;13:272–284. [PubMed]
[8] Isambert H, Venier P, Maggs AC, Fattoum A, Kassab R, Pantaloni D, Carlier MF. Flexibility of actin filaments derived from thermal fluctuations. Effect of bound nucleotide, phalloidin, and muscle regulatory proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:11437–11444. [PubMed]
[9] Janmey PA, Hvidt S, Oster GF, Lamb J, Stossel TP, Hartwig JH. Effect of ATP on actin filament stiffness. Nature. 1990;347:95–99. [PubMed]
[10] Otterbein LR, Graceffa P, Dominguez R. The crystal structure of uncomplexed actin in the ADP state. Science. 2001;293:708–711. [PubMed]
[11] Orlova A, Egelman EH. A conformational change in the actin subunit can change the flexibility of the actin filament. J. Mol. Biol. 1993;232:334–341. [PubMed]
[12] Nyitrai M, Hild G, Hartvig N, Belágyi J, Somogyi B. Conformational and dynamic differences between actin filaments polymerized from ATP- or ADP-actin monomers. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:41143–41149. [PubMed]
[13] Mohri K, Takano-Ohmuro H, Nakashima H, Hayakawa K, Endo T, Hanaoka K, Obinata T. Expression of cofilin isoforms during development of mouse striated muscles. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 2000;21:49–57. [PubMed]
[14] Rouayrenc JF, Fattoum A, Gabrion J, Audemard E, Kassab R. Muscle gelsolin: isolation from heart tissue and characterization as an integral myofibrillar protein. FEBS Lett. 1984;167:52–58. [PubMed]
[15] Terasaki AG, Morikawa K, Suzuki H, Oshima K, Ohashi K. Characterization of Arp2/3 complex in chicken tissues. Cell Struct. Funct. 2002;27:383–391. [PubMed]
[16] Atkinson SJ, Hosford MA, Molitoris BA. Mechanism of actin polymerisation in cellular ATP depletion. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:5194–5199. [PubMed]
[17] Urosev D, Ma Q, Tan AL, Robinson RC, Burtnick LD. The structure of gelsolin bound to ATP. J. Mol. Biol. 2006;357:765–772. [PubMed]
[18] Gourlay CW, Ayscough KR. The actin cytoskeleton: a key regulator of apoptosis and ageing? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005;6:583–589. [PubMed]
[19] Carvajal K, Moreno-Sanchez R. Heart metabolic disturbances in cardiovascular diseases. Arch. Med. Res. 2003;34:89–99. [PubMed]
[20] Levitsky DI, Nikolaeva OP, Orlov VN, Pavlov DA, Ponomarev MA, Rostkova EV. Differential scanning calorimetric studies on myosin and actin. Biochemistry (Mosc) 1998;63:322–333. [PubMed]
[21] Feuer G, Molnár F, Pettko E, Straub FB. Studies on the composition and polymerisation of actin. Hung. Acta Physiol. 1948;1:150–163. [PubMed]
[22] Spudich JA, Watt S. The regulation of rabbit skeletal muscle contraction. I. Biochemical studies of the interaction of the tropomyosin–troponin complex with actin and the proteolytic fragments of myosin. J. Biol. Chem. 1971;246:4866–4871. [PubMed]
[23] Houk TW, Jr., Ue K. The measurement of actin concentration in solution: a comparison of methods. Anal. Biochem. 1974;62:66–74. [PubMed]
[24] Strzelecka-Golaszewska H, Moraczewska J, Khaitlina SY, Mossakowska M. Localization of the tightly bound divalent-cation-dependent and nucleotide-dependent conformation changes in G-actin using limited proteolytic digestion. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993;211:731–742. [PubMed]
[25] Drewes G, Faulstich H. A reversible conformational transition in muscle actin is caused by nucleotide exchange and uncovers cysteine in position 10. J. Biol. Chem. 1991;266:5508–5513. [PubMed]
[26] Criddle AH, Geeves MA, Jeffries T. The use of actin labelled with N-(1-pyrenyl)iodoacetamide to study the interaction of actin with myosin subfragments and troponin/tropomyosin. Biochem. J. 1985;232:343–349. [PubMed]
[27] Sanchez-Ruiz JM, Lopez-Lacomba JL, Cortijo M, Mateo PL. Differential scanning calorimetry of the irreversible thermal denaturation of thermolysin. Biochemistry. 1988;27:1648–1652. [PubMed]
[28] Lumry R, Eyring H. Conformation changes of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. 1954;58:110–120.
[29] Orbán J, Pozsonyi K, Szarka K, Barkó S, Bódis E, Lőrinczy D. Thermal characterisation of actin filaments prepared from ADP-actin monomers. JTAC. 2006;84:619–623.
[30] Dergez T, Könczöl F, Farkas N, Belágyi J, Lőrinczy D. DSC study of glycerol-extracted muscle fibers in intermediate states of ATP hydrolysis. J. Therm. Anal. Calorimetry. 2005;80:445–449.
[31] Vogl T, Jatzke C, Hinz HJ, Benz J, Huber R. Thermodynamic stability of annexin V E17G: equilibrium parameters from an irreversible unfolding reaction. Biochemistry. 1997;36:1657–1668. [PubMed]
[32] Korn ED, Carlier MF, Pantaloni D. Actin polymerisation and ATP hydrolysis. Science. 1987;238:638–644. [PubMed]
[33] Pollard TD, Goldberg I, Schwarz WH. Nucleotide exchange, structure, and mechanical properties of filaments assembled from ATP-actin and ADP-actin. J. Biol. Chem. 1992;267:20339–20345. [PubMed]
[34] Lőrinczy D, Belágyi J. Nucleotide binding induces global and local structural changes of myosin head in muscle fibres. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001;268:5970–5976. [PubMed]
[35] Papp G, Bugyi B, Ujfalusi Z, Halasi S, Orbán J. The effect of pH on the thermal stability of α-cardiac actin isoforms. JTAC. 2005;82:281–285.
[36] Gaszner B, Nyitrai M, Hartvig N, Koszegi T, Somogyi B, Belagyi J. Replacement of ATP with ADP affects the dynamic and conformational properties of actin monomer. Biochemistry. 1999;38:12885–12892. [PubMed]
[37] Ladbury J, Doyle ML. Biocalorimetry 2: Applications of Calorimetry in the Biological Sciences. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2004. pp. 24–25.
[38] Cooper A, Nutley MA, Wadood A. Differential scanning micro-calorimetry. In: Harding SE, Chowdhury BZ, editors. Protein–ligand interactions: hydrodynamics and calorimetry. Oxford University Press; Oxford: 2001. pp. 287–318.
[39] Pace CN, Scholtz JM. Measuring the conformational stability of a protein. In: Creighton TE, editor. Protein Structure. Springer; Oxford: 2002. pp. 299–323.
[40] Orbán J, Halasi S, Papp G, Barkó S, Bugyi B. Thermodynamic characterization of different actin isoforms. JTAC. 2005;82:287–290.
[41] Sukumaran S, Hauser K, Maier E, Benz R, Mantele W. Structure–function correlation of outer membrane protein porin from Paracoccus denitrificans. Biopolymers. 2006;82:344–348. [PubMed]
[42] Sun M, Oakes JL, Ananthanarayanan SK, Hawley KH, Tsien RY, Adams SR, Yengo CM. Dynamics of the upper 50-kDa domain of myosin V examined with fluorescence resonance energy transfer. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:5711–5717. [PubMed]
[43] Yengo CM, De La Cruz EM, Chrin LR, Gaffney DP, 2nd, Berger CL. Actin-induced closure of the actin-binding cleft of smooth muscle myosin. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:24114–24119. [PubMed]
[44] Seidman JG, Seidman C. The genetic basis for cardiomyopathy: from mutation identification to mechanistic paradigms. Cell. 2001;104:557–567. [PubMed]
[45] Lim DS, Roberts R, Marian AJ. Expression profiling of cardiac genes in human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: insight into the pathogenesis of phenotypes. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2001;38:1175–1180. [PMC free article] [PubMed]