Cpx two-component systems appear to be present in many bacterial phyla, but almost all studies of this pathway have been carried out with
E. coli and closely related species. Our studies suggest that this pathway may fulfill a different role in the physiology of
V. cholerae than of
E. coli. Unlike Cpx systems in
E. coli, there is no basal activation of the
V. cholerae Cpx pathway, and this two-component system is not required for
V. cholerae pathogenicity. In
E. coli, this system is thought to sense and respond to envelope stress; certain misfolded cell envelope proteins are postulated to stimulate this pathway (for a review, see reference
22), but the precise molecular triggers are not well defined. Furthermore, we found that the
V. cholerae Cpx pathway does not respond to several of the known activators of the
E. coli pathway. The
V. cholerae Cpx pathway may monitor salinity, since we discovered that chloride ions activate this system. In addition, our results suggest that the
V. cholerae Cpx system may detect misfolded envelope proteins containing aberrant disulfide bonds, particularly proteins whose proper folding is mediated by DsbC.
Differences in the predicted polypeptide sequences of the likely sensor domain of CpxA in
V. cholerae and
E. coli suggested that the activators of the Cpx pathway in these gram-negative organisms might differ. However, it is difficult to explain why the basal expression of this system is so low in
V. cholerae. N16961, the sequenced
V. cholerae strain we used in our studies, has 162 predicted sensor proteins and 60 predicted response regulators (SENTRA database), and it is possible that some other signal transduction system is redundant with Cpx in this pathogen. Redundant or alternative signal transduction pathways could also explain the lack of mutation-associated phenotypes that we detected in
V. cholerae cpx deletion mutants.
E. coli cpx deletion mutants have been reported to have aberrant motility and defects in virulence and production of surface appendages (
3,
14,
30,
44), but we did not observe similar phenotypes in
V. cholerae mutants.
Our findings indicate that Cl
− concentrations greater that 250 mM stimulate the
V. cholerae Cpx pathway. Additionally, we found that a
cpxR mutant had significantly reduced survival when shifted from low to high salt conditions (data not shown), raising the possibility that the Cpx system enables
V. cholerae adaptation to upshifts in salinity. A similar role for Cl
− in
E. coli has not been assessed in reported studies. On the other hand, upshifts in osmolarity, which activate the
E. coli Cpx pathway, did not do so for
V. cholerae. We have not assessed if Cl
− directly alters the activity of one of the components of the Cpx pathway or instead acts indirectly by influencing factors that affect Cpx signal transduction. Biochemical studies have demonstrated that chloride can function as an allosteric regulator of the Lac repressor (
6) and can directly bind and activate
E. coli glutamate decarboxylase (
25). Fleischer et al. (
24) reconstituted the
E. coli Cpx system in vitro and showed that autophosphorylation of CpxA was enhanced by KCl and, to a lesser extent, other solutes containing chloride, like NaCl, RbCl, or NH
4Cl. Interestingly, these authors also found that sucrose and trehalose did not affect CpxA activities in vitro, raising the possibility that osmolarity stimulates the
E. coli Cpx pathway indirectly. If osmolarity stimulates Cpx activity indirectly in
E. coli, it is possible that the factors that enable the Cpx system to sense osmolarity are missing in
V. cholerae.
The results of our transposon mutagenesis studies are consistent with the idea that the V. cholerae Cpx pathway primarily mediates a cellular response to perturbations in the cell envelope, as in E. coli. Most of the genes that answered our screen for mutants in which the Cpx system is activated encode proteins that likely localize to the cell envelope. This strong bias toward proteins in the cell envelope suggests that this compartment is the site where most of the processes that lead to Cpx activation arise. Cytoplasmic proteins also influence Cpx activation since approximately one third of the genes that answered our screen encode proteins that were predicted to localize to that compartment. These proteins could influence processes that occur in the cell envelope and/or the Cpx pathway itself.
The absence of TolC activated the
V. cholerae Cpx pathway. TolC is the outer-membrane component of several efflux systems. These systems remove a variety of toxic compounds from the cell, including antibiotics, antimicrobial peptides, and detergents. TolC is also needed for the secretion of several proteins, including hemolysin and proteases (for a review, see references
5 and
35). Thus, activation of the Cpx pathway in the
tolC mutant likely results from the accumulation in the cytoplasm or periplasm of products (
1,
45) that are ordinarily expelled from the cell.
Genetic analyses of CpxR activation suggest that the formation of aberrant disulfide bonds within the periplasmic compartment is also a potent inducer of the Cpx pathway. Mutations within
dsbC and
dsbD, which prevent isomerization of periplasmic disulfide bonds, stimulated CpxR activity, but mutations within
dsbA and
dsbB, which prevent the introduction of disulfides, did not. Both sets of mutations are likely to lead to the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the periplasm; however, in the
dsbA and
dsbB mutant strains, these proteins should have fewer disulfide bonds, whereas those in the
dsbC and
dsbD mutant strains should contain incorrect disulfides. These data suggest that at least some proteins that stimulate the Cpx pathway do so via aberrant disulfides and that misfolding alone may not suffice. Our finding that a mutation of
dsbA abolished Cpx activation in a
dsbC mutant provides additional support for this model. Incorrect disulfide bonds could result in the exposure of specific structures or sequences that stimulate the Cpx pathway. Work with
E. coli suggests that there may be specific recognition of protein structures or sequences by the Cpx system (
33,
42). Alternatively, it is possible that periplasmic proteins with aberrant disulfide bonds harm some as-yet-undefined component of the cell envelope and thereby indirectly trigger the Cpx pathway.
The formation of aberrant disulfide bonds may also underlie copper's stimulatory effect on the Cpx pathway. We found that this metal, a nonspecific oxidant thought to promote the formation of periplasmic disulfide bonds between cysteines at a higher rate than DsbA (
28,
34), is a potent inducer of the Cpx response in
V. cholerae, and similar results have been reported for
E. coli (
61). Strikingly, the normally inactive Cpx pathway in the
dsbA dsbC mutant was activated when the mutant was grown on plates containing CuSO
4 (data not shown), indicating that CuSO
4 can bypass the requirement for
dsbA in Cpx activation. Thus, our identification of inappropriate periplasmic protein oxidation as a trigger for the Cpx pathway may provide an explanation for earlier observations regarding Cpx activation.
The mechanism by which improperly oxidized proteins trigger the Cpx pathway has not yet been fully characterized; however, it appears to differ from several previously described stimuli in at least one key respect. We found that CpxP is required for at least some of the activation of the
V. cholerae Cpx system in the
dsbC background. In contrast, induction of the
E. coli Cpx pathway by several stimuli was found to be independent of CpxP (
17). In
V. cholerae, perhaps CpxP interacts with misoxidized proteins, either directly or indirectly, to promote activation of the Cpx system. Alternatively, CpxP could be a substrate for DsbC; however, this protein only contains two cysteine residues, making this possibility less likely. In aggregate, our findings suggest that studies of the molecular triggers of the Cpx pathway and the substrates of DsbC may be mutually informative.