PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of neuroncolAboutAuthor GuidelinesEditorial BoardNeuro-Oncology
 
Neuro Oncol. Feb 2009; 11(1): 9–21.
PMCID: PMC2718963
EGFRvIII expression and PTEN loss synergistically induce chromosomal instability and glial tumors
Li Li, Amalia Dutra, Evgenia Pak, Joseph E. Labrie, III, Rachel M. Gerstein, Pier Paolo Pandolfi, Larry D. Recht, and Alonzo H. Ross
Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology (L.L., A.H.R.) and Molecular Genetics and Microbiology (J.E.L., R.M.G.), University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA; National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (A.D., E.P.); Program of Cancer Genetics, Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (P.P.P.); Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical School, Palo Alto, CA (L.D.R.); USA
Address correspondence to Alonzo H. Ross, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 364 Plantation St., Worcester, MA 01605, USA ( Alonzo.Ross/at/umassmed.edu).
Received December 10, 2007; Accepted April 29, 2008.
Glioblastomas often show activation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and loss of PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10) tumor suppressor, but it is not known if these two genetic lesions act together to transform cells. To answer this question, we infected PTEN−/− neural precursor cells with a retrovirus encoding EGFRvIII, which is a constitutively activated receptor. EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells formed highly mitotic tumors with nuclear pleomorphism, necrotic areas, and glioblastoma markers. The transformed cells showed increased cell proliferation, centrosome amplification, colony formation in soft agar, self-renewal, expression of the stem cell marker CD133, and resistance to oxidative stress and ionizing radiation. The RAS/mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/ Akt) pathways were activated, and checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1), the DNA damage regulator, was phosphorylated at S280 by Akt, suppressing Chk1 phosphorylation at S345 in response to ionizing irradiation. The PTEN−/− cells showed low levels of DNA damage in the absence of irradiation, which was increased by EGFRvIII expression. Finally, secondary changes occurred during tumor growth in mice. Cells from these tumors showed decreased tumor latencies and additional chromosomal aberrations. Most of these tumor lines showed translocations of mouse chromosome 15. Intracranial injections of one of these lines led to invasive, glial fibrillary acidic protein–positive, nestin-positive tumors. These results provide a molecular basis for the occurrence of these two genetic lesions in brain tumors and point to a role in induction of genomic instability.
Keywords: aneuploidy, EGFRvIII, glioblastoma, neural precursor cells, PTEN
Hyperactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in glioblastomas occurs by several mechanisms. The EGFR gene is amplified in many glioblastomas,1 and as a result, EGFR protein is overexpressed. In addition, many tumors with amplified EGFR express a mutated EGFR.2 The most common of these modified receptors is EGFRvIII, which has a 267–amino-acid deletion in the extracellular domain.3 Using an anti-EGFRvIII antibody, EGFRvIII was detected in 53% of glioblastomas.4
EGFRvIII enhances cell proliferation, tumor growth, and invasiveness.510 EGFRvIII does not bind EGF, but its kinase domain is constitutively activated, possibly due to receptor dimerization.11 EGFRvIII constitutively activates the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway and, to a lesser degree, the RAS/mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK) pathway.1214 Finally, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) is activated to high levels.15
Phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) is a major tumor suppressor in the development of glioblastomas.16,17 In a mouse model, inactivation of the retinoblastoma (Rb) and PTEN tumor suppressors leads to astrocytic tumors.18 Deletions or mutations have been detected in other tumor types, including endometrial, melanoma, and prostate, identifying PTEN as an important tumor suppressor.19 The PTEN protein is a phosphatidylinositol phosphate phosphatase specific for the 3-position of the inositol ring.20
Many glioblastomas show EGFR amplification, EGFRvIII expression, and PTEN loss.2123 Von Deimling et al.22 found that, without exception, glioblastomas with EGFR amplification also had loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of chromosome 10. In a recent study with 220 brain tumors, EGFR amplification was strongly associated with LOH of chromosome 10q (p < 0.0001).23 EGFRvIII expression usually occurs in glioblastomas with EGFR amplification. PTEN loss is more common in primary than in secondary glioblastomas,24 and EGFR amplification and PTEN loss frequently occur in the same tumors.21 EGFR amplification and PTEN loss are positively associated in glioblastomas (p = 0.018) and are negative predictors of patient survival. EGFRvIII expression is more common for tumors with intact PTEN but also occurs for glioblastomas lacking PTEN.25 PTEN expression reverses EGFRvIII-induced cell proliferation and increases susceptibility to anti-EGFR drugs.2629 In glioblastomas, PTEN loss is closely linked to activation of the PI3K pathway, and EGFRvIII is linked to the RAS/ERK pathway.25 Expression of EGFRvIII or loss of PTEN accelerates development of brain tumors in response to an activated RAS gene.30 These findings led us to hypothesize that EGFR hyperactivation and PTEN loss might act together to transform cells.
To test this hypothesis, we have developed a mouse model by infecting PTEN−/− neural precursor cells with an EGFRvIII retrovirus. Although glioblastomas commonly express both EGFR and EGFRvIII, we chose to analyze EGFRvIII because its mitogenic activity is constant and not dependent on the concentration of EGF in the culture medium. We found that precursor cells bearing both genetic lesions form tumors in immunodeficient mice. Furthermore, secondary changes occurred during tumor growth. These results provide a molecular basis for the occurrence of these two genetic lesions in brain tumors and point to their role in induction of genomic instability.
EGFRvIII Retrovirus
The EGFRvIII retrovirus was prepared from the green fluorescent protein (GFP)-bearing retrovirus MSCV-XZ066,31 which was also used as a control virus. Pseudotyped VSV-G (vesicular stomatitis virus glyco-protein) viruses were prepared by transfecting the 293GPG packaging cell line32 with the pMSCV-XZ066 or EGFRvIII-pMSCV-XZ066 plasmids. The viral supernatants were concentrated by centrifugation (90 min at 75,000g). As determined by titration of NIH-3T3 cells, the titer was about 107 cfu/ml. Single-cell suspensions of precursor cells in 5 μg/ml Polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were infected for 8 h with retrovirus. After 48 h, we selected GFP-positive cells (50%–80% of total) by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), using a FACS Vantage SE DIVA Cell Sorter (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). At least 95% of the sorted cells were GFP positive.
Preparation of Subventricular Zone Neural Precursor Cells
Neural precursor cells were isolated from brain sub-ventricular zone using the procedure of Weiss and coworkers.33 Striata were removed from newborn mice, triturated to single cells, and placed in serum-free Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)/F12 (1:1) supplemented with glucose (0.3%), transferrin (100 μg/ ml), putrescine (60 μM), progesterone (10 nM), selenium chloride (30 nM), HEPES (5 mM), insulin (23 μg/ml), and EGF (20 ng/ml). Cultures were fed every 48 h with 5 ml medium and passaged every 7 days.
Because the litters included PTEN+/+ and PTEN−/− pups, we could not pool tissue from multiple pups. We were concerned that our yield of precursor cells would be low from a single embryonic day 14 (E14) subventricular zone culture. The cultures from newborn mice grew and behaved like our earlier E14-derived cultures (data not shown).
To produce PTEN−/− neural precursor cultures, we first prepared nestin-Cre+/+ PTEN+/lox mice in a C57BL6/J background, starting with the PTEN lox/lox mice (mouse genomic DNA PTEN exons 4 and 5 were flanked by 2 loxP sites in a direct orientation)34 and nestin-Cre mice (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME, USA). The nestin-Cre mice bear the Cre DNA recombinase under the control of the nestin promoter, which leads to expression of Cre in neural stem and precursor cells. The PTEN lox/lox mice have loxP sites so that, in the presence of the Cre recombinase, exons 4 and 5 of the PTEN gene are deleted. Consequently, PTEN is selectively inactivated in the brain stem/precursor cells expressing nestin. However, the PTEN gene is intact in other tissues that do not express the Cre recombinase. We crossed nestin-Cre+/+ PTEN+/lox mice with themselves. Because the PTEN−/− mice die shortly after birth, we prepared neural precursor cell cultures immediately after birth. The tails were retained for DNA extraction and genotyping. Both the PTEN+/+ and PTEN−/− cultures expressed Cre.
For genotyping, we used two sets of PCR primers. To detect the intact PTEN gene, we used primers P1 (5'-TGT T T T TGACCA AT TA A AGTAGGCT-GTG-3') and P2 (5'-AAAAGTTCCCCTGCTGAT-GATTTGT-3').35 To detect deletion of exons 4 and 5, we used primers P2 and P3 (5'-TTCTCTTGAGCACT-GTTTCACAGGC-3').
Western Blotting and Immunofluorescence Microscopy
Western blotting was carried out as previously described.36 The rabbit antibodies anti-phospho–Akt (ser473, 1:1,000), anti-Akt (1:1,000), anti-phospho–checkpoint kinase 1 (anti-P-Chk1; ser345, 1:1,000), anti-phospho–mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1/2 (anti-P-MEK1/2; ser217/221, 1:1,000), anti-MEK1/2 (1:1,000), anti-phospho–stress-activated protein kinase/ JNK (anti-P-SAPK/JNK; thr183/tyr185, 1:1,000), anti–serine-threonine kinase (anti–Aurora A, 1:1,000), and Aurora B (1:1,000) were from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA, USA). Anti-phospho-Chk1 (ser280, 1:1,000) was a gift from Dr. Ramon Parsons (Dept. of Pathology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA). The mouse anti-Chk1 monoclonal antibody (G4, 1:1,000) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Anti-β-tubulin (clone 2-28-33, 1:2,000) was from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Anti-phosphohistone-H2AX (anti-P-γ-H2AX; ser139, 1:1,000) was from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY, USA).
Cultured cells were spun down on slides with a Cytospin apparatus (Shandon Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and fixed with methanol (−20°C) for 15 min. After being blocked with 10% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), cells were incubated with rabbit anti-pericentrin antibody (Steve Doxsey, University of Massachusetts Medical School; 1:100) or mouse monoclonal anti-γ-tubulin antibody (Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, MO, USA; 1:500) for 12 h at 4°C. The cells were then incubated with fluorescein- or rhodamine-linked anti-immunoglobulin G (IgG) secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). The coverslips were mounted with Vectashield mounting medium with DAPI (4',6 diamidino-2- phenylindole; Vector Laboratories).
For CD133 immunostaining, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at room temperature for 20 min and washed twice with PBS. Rat anti-mouse prominin-1 (CD133) antibody (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA, USA; final concentration, 5 μg/ml) was added to 5.5 × 105 cells in 25 μl 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in PBS. Samples were incubated for 20 min at room temperature, and unbound antibody was removed by washing cells twice with 5% FBS in PBS. The cells were resuspended in 25 μl 5% FBS in PBS and goat anti-IgG fluorescein isothiocyanate (1:200). The samples were incubated for 10 min at room temperature in the dark, and the cells were then washed once with 5% FBS and once with PBS and then resuspended in 200 μl PBS. Cell fluorescence was analyzed with a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) in the University of Massachusetts Medical School Flow Cytometry Core Lab, and the resulting data were analyzed with FlowJo version 7.2.2 software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
Cellular Assays and Cell Irradiation
Assays for migration, invasion, proliferation, and apoptosis were carried out as previously described.36 To assess colony formation in soft agar, 1,000 cells were cultured in 0.1 ml 0.35% Bacto Agar (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lake, NJ, USA) in a 96-well plate. After 2 weeks, colonies (>100 μm) were scored by light microscopy.
One potential problem was that retroviral insertion might alter cell properties. To meet this concern, we tested multiple independent cultures. In all cases, the results for independently derived cultures were essentially identical. Hence, changes in cell properties are due to EGFRvIII or loss of PTEN and not due to retroviral insertion.
For analysis of Chk1 phosphorylation, cells were irradiated with 5 Gy ionizing radiation from a 137Cs source at 0.87 Gy/min. Cells were harvested 2 h after irradiation for Western blotting. To determine radio-resistance, cells were irradiated with 2, 5, or 10 Gy ionizing radiation. Two days after irradiation, cell survival was assessed with a 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay.
Karyotyping
Cytogenetic analysis of cell cultures was performed by spectral karyotyping (SKY),37,38 using cells after three to five passages in culture. SKY is based on the simultaneous hybridization of 21 chromosome-specific painting probes labeled with different fluorochrome combinations (Applied Spectral Imaging, Vista, CA, USA). The measurement of defined emission spectra using interferometer-based spectral imaging permits discernment of all mouse chromosomes in different colors. For cells showing apparent rearrangements, the experiment was repeated using only the SKY probes for the chromosomes included in the putative translocation, conclusively verifying the identities of the translocated chromosomes.
Growth of Tumors in Immunodeficient Mice
We subcutaneously injected (1 × 107 cells in 0.1 ml) immunodeficient mice (NIH-III [NIH-bg-nu-xidBR], 50-day-old females; Charles River Laboratories, Boston, MA, USA) on the back. Tumors about 1 cm in diameter were removed and divided into three pieces. One piece was used for preparation of paraffin blocks. The resulting sections (5 μm thick) were immunostained with the mouse monoclonals anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) antibody cocktail (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA; 1:500), antinestin antibody (BD Pharmingen; 1:500), and antioligodendrocyte marker O4 antibody (Chemicon International; 1:50). In addition, we used rabbit antibodies from Cell Signaling: anti-P-MEK1/2 (ser217/221, 1:100) and anti-P-Akt (ser473, 1:50). The second tumor piece was used to establish PTEN−/− EGFRvIII tumor (PET) cell lines following the procedure for mouse striata. The third piece was frozen, wrapped in aluminum foil, and smashed with a hammer. The fragments were extracted and used for Western blotting.
For intracranial tumors, NIH-III mice (7 weeks old) were anesthetized with i.p. ketamine/xylazine and stereo-tactically injected with 106 cells in 5 μl of DMEM/F12 medium using a Hamilton syringe (Hamilton, Bonaduz Ab, Bonaduz, Switzerland) mounted on a Kopf model 900 stereotaxic apparatus (Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA, USA). The injections were in the right corpus striatum (lateral distance relative to the bregma, 2.3 mm; anterior distance, 0.7 mm). The depth of the injection was 3.0 mm from the dura. To avoid backflow, the injection was performed over 5 min. The needle was left in place for an additional 5 min before being slowly withdrawn. Six weeks after injection, the mice were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde. All animal studies were performed in accordance with the Animal Care and Use Rules at the University of Massachusetts Medical School.
Statistics
The Tukey’s multiple comparison test and the Student’s t-test were used to analyze data sets. Results with p < 0.05 were considered significant.
EGFRvIII Expression and PTEN Loss Synergistically Transform Neural Precursor Cells
We crossed nestin-Cre+/+ PTEN+/lox mice with themselves to produce PTEN−/− neural precursor cells.39 Deletion of the PTEN gene was efficient as judged by PCR of genomic DNA (Fig. 1A) and the absence of anti-PTEN immunostaining (data not shown). These cells were infected with control or EGFRvIII retrovirus. Although both retroviruses bear GFP, we refer to the control as the GFP retrovirus. Infected cells were selected for GFP expression by flow cytometry, and the cultures grew with neurosphere morphology and expressed the stem cell marker nestin (data not shown). By Western blotting, EGFRvIII was expressed at levels comparable to endogenous EGFR (data not shown). In addition, treatment of neural precursor cells with 10% fetal bovine serum converts virtually 100% of wild-type neural precursor cells to GFAP-positive astrocytic cells, and treatment with basic fibroblast growth factor induces neuronal differentiation.40 GFP PTEN+/+, EGFRvIII PTEN+/+, GFP PTEN−/−, and EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells differentiate along both astrocytic and neuronal lineages (data not shown). Hence, this procedure efficiently produces EGFRvIII PTEN−/− neural precursor cells.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Expression of EGFRvIII (activated epidermal growth factor receptor) and loss of PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10) synergistically induced tumor formation. (A) Analysis of PTEN deletion by PCR of genomic DNA. For lanes 2–4, (more ...)
We injected immunodeficient mice subcutaneously with GFP PTEN+/+, EGFRvIII PTEN+/+, GFP PTEN−/−, and EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells. For the EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells, tumors were detected 10–14 weeks after injection (seven of seven; Fig. 1B, C). For the other cell groups, no tumors were detected even after 21 weeks. As judged by Western blotting, these tumors strongly expressed EGFRvIII (Fig. 1D). The tumors showed areas of necrosis (Fig. 1E), which are often found in glioblastomas.41 These vascular tumors contained undifferentiated cells at high cell density with numerous mitoses. Many cells also had spindle-shaped cytoplasmic projections (Fig. 1F). All of these tumors (seven of seven) were positive for GFAP and nestin (Fig. 1G, H) and negative for the neuronal markers NeuN and synaptophysin and the oligodendroglial marker O4 (data not shown). Hence, EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells formed tumors that expressed markers associated with glioblastomas.
Cell Proliferation, Invasiveness, Self-Renewal, Colony Formation, and Apoptosis
To better understand how these two mutations transform neural precursor cells, we assessed their effects on cancer-related properties. We characterized proliferation of the precursor cells by reduction of MTT. After 4 days in complete defined medium and medium lacking EGF, there were 2.6- and 5.4-fold more EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells than GFP PTEN+/+ cells (Fig. 2A). Both EGFRvIII PTEN−/− and GFP PTEN−/− cells grew in medium lacking insulin (Fig. 2B). These results demonstrate that EGFRvIII and PTEN loss make precursor cells less dependent on EGF and insulin.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Expression of EGFRvIII (activated epidermal growth factor receptor) and loss of PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10) enhanced proliferation, motility, invasiveness, and resistance to apoptosis. (A and B) Cell proliferation over (more ...)
Cell migration and invasiveness were measured by filter penetration assays. For migration measurements, the filter was coated with gelatin to increase adhesion and prevent loss of cells from the filter. For invasion assays, the filter was coated with Matrigel to clog the pores. EGFRvIII and PTEN loss increased cell migration and invasiveness. Migration was increased 4.8-fold for EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells and 2.3-fold for GFP PTEN−/− cells compared with GFP PTEN+/+ cells (Fig. 2C). Invasiveness was increased by 5.6-fold for EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells and 2.9-fold for GFP PTEN−/− cells (Fig. 2D).
Because PTEN haploinsufficiency reduced H2O2-induced apoptosis of neural precursor cells,36 we treated cells with H2O2 and measured apoptosis by TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling) staining. PTEN loss, but not EGFRvIII, increased resistance to H 2O2 (Fig. 2E). However, EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells were substantially more resistant. The H2O2 concentrations for which 50% of cells were apoptotic were, for GFP PTEN+/+, 0.05 mM; EGFRvIII PTEN+/+, 0.06 mM; GFP PTEN−/−, 0.1 mM; and EGFRvIII PTEN−/−, 0.3 mM. The combination of EGFRvIII and PTEN loss synergistically enhanced resistance to oxidative stress–induced apoptosis. We also irradiated these cells and assessed survival. PTEN loss or EGFRvIII expression made the cells more resistant, but EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells were much more resistant (Fig. 2F). Treatment of EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells with 10 Gy ionizing radiation decreased the cell number by 16% ± 2% compared with EGFRvIII PTEN+/+ cells (38% ± 1%), GFP PTEN−/− cells (40% ± 1%), and GFP PTEN+/+ cells (55% ± 1%).
We carried out two in vitro assays relevant to self-renewal. Cells were plated at low density (1,000 cells/ ml).42 The number of neurospheres that form is a measure of the number of self-renewing stem cells. EGFRvIII had little effect on sphere formation (GFP PTEN+/+, 11 ± 1 neurospheres/ml; EGFRvIII PTEN+/+, 15 ± 1; Fig. 3A). GFP PTEN−/− cells showed increased sphere formation (50 ± 5 neurospheres/ml), but EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells showed much greater sphere formation (112 ± 6 neurospheres/ml). We also assayed these cells for colony formation in soft agar. EGFRvIII or PTEN loss only slightly increased colony formation (GFP PTEN+/+, 1 ± 1 colonies; EGFRvIII PTEN+/+, 6 ± 1 colonies; GFP PTEN−/−, 5 ± 1 colonies; Fig. 3B). However, EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells showed enhanced colony formation (47 ± 5 colonies). As judged by flow cytometry, expression of the stem cell marker CD133 was increased for EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells (6% CD133+ cells) compared with GFP PTEN+/+ cells (1.2%), EGFRvIII PTEN+/+ cells (1.3%), and GFP PTEN−/− cells (2.0%; Fig. 3C). For neurosphere formation, colony formation in soft agar, and CD133 expression, there was a synergy between EGFRvIII expression and PTEN loss.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Expression of EGFRvIII (activated epidermal growth factor receptor) and loss of PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10) enhanced self-renewal and expression of CD133. (A) Cells were plated at low density (1,000 cells/ml) and neurospheres (more ...)
EGFRvIII Expression and PTEN Loss Affect Cell Signaling
Because PTEN haploinsufficiency increased phosphorylation of the downstream effector Akt,36 and PTEN loss correlated with Akt phosphorylation in glioblastomas,25 we measured this parameter. Phosphorylation of Akt was increased by 2.0-fold in GFP PTEN−/− cells and by 3.2-fold in EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells (Fig. 4A, B). In contrast, EGFRvIII in PTEN+/+ cells induced a modest increase in Akt phosphorylation.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Activation of protein kinase B (Akt), RAS/mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK), and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathways. (A) Cell extracts were assayed by Western blotting using anti-phospho-Akt (P-Akt), anti-phospho–mitogen-activated protein (more ...)
In glioblastomas, RAS/ERK activation correlates with cell proliferation and decreased patient survival.43 Furthermore, glioblastomas frequently show activated JNK.13,44 We assayed activation of these pathways using phospho-specific antibodies (Fig. 4A, B). Phosphorylation of the MEK1/2 kinase in the RAS/ERK pathway was increased by 1.4-fold in EGFRvIII PTEN+/+ cultures and 2.5-fold in GFP PTEN−/− cultures. However, EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells showed greater activation (5-fold). Phosphorylation of JNK showed modest increases for EGFRvIII PTEN+/+ and EGFRvIII PTEN−/− (1.9-fold; Fig. 4A, B).
Six tumors formed by EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells in mice were sectioned and stained with anti-P-Akt and anti-P-MEK1/2 antibodies. All six tumors showed activation of the Akt and RAS/ERK pathways (Fig. 1I, J).
DNA Damage and Genomic Stability
As previously reported,45 loss of PTEN can lead to activation of Akt and phosphorylation of Chk1 on ser280. This modification suppresses responses of Chk1 to ionizing radiation. Phosphorylation of Chk1 on ser280 was increased in GFP PTEN−/− (1.8-fold) and EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells (2.0-fold; Fig. 5A). In the absence of ionizing radiation, phosphorylation of ser345 on Chk1 was not detected. Ionizing radiation induced phosphorylation of Chk1 on ser345 for GFP PTEN+/+ and EGFRvIII PTEN+/+ cells but was greatly reduced for GFP PTEN−/− and EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) phosphorylation and DNA damage. (A) Cell extracts analyzed by Western blotting. Loss of PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10) leads to phosphorylation of ser280 on Chk1 (P-S280Chk1), preventing phosphorylation (more ...)
We next assessed phosphorylation of γ-H2AX, which is a marker for double-strand DNA breaks. Ionizing radiation induced γ-H2AX expression for all four cell groups (Fig. 5B). However, GFP PTEN−/− and EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells showed the γ-H2AX band without ionizing radiation, and EGFRvIII enhanced γ-H2AX levels with and without ionizing radiation. Because γ-H2AX is closely associated with double-strand DNA breaks, we conclude that PTEN loss leads to DNA damage, as reported for other cell types,45,46 and that EGFRvIII enhances the effect of PTEN loss.
Centrosome Amplification
We next checked for centrosome amplification, which occurs in many tumors.47 The EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells showed centrosome amplification (12% ± 3% of cells), whereas GFP PTEN+/+, EGFRvIII PTEN−/−, and GFP PTEN−/− cells did not (Fig. 6A–C). The micrographs show cells immunostained with anti-pericentrin. Similar results were obtained using anti-γ-tubulin antibody (data not shown). We also measured levels of Aurora A and B, which when overexpressed can cause centrosome amplification.48 In EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells, Aurora A and B levels were increased 2.5- and 1.7-fold, respectively (Fig. 6D).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Expression of EGFRvIII (activated epidermal growth factor receptor) and loss of PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10) synergistically induced centrosome amplification. (A and B) Overlay of anti-pericentrin immunostaining (red) (more ...)
Tumor Progression and Chromosomal Instability
We injected cells from one EGFRvIII PTEN−/− culture into immunodeficient mice, dispersed the cells from six tumors from six different mice, and placed them into culture. These cultures grew with neurosphere morphology (data not shown), and we named them PET1–PET6 (PTEN−/− EGFRvIII tumors 1–6). We subcutaneously injected the parental EGFRvIII PTEN−/− PET1–PET6 cells into immunodeficient mice. Tumors were detected for EGFRvIII PTEN−/− PET1–PET6 cells after 89 ± 18, 48 ± 8, 10 ± 1, 60 ± 10, 50 ± 7, 11 ± 1, and 10 ± 1 days, respectively. All of the PET lines showed shorter tumor latencies than EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells. PET2, PET5, and PET6 showed shorter latencies than PET1, PET3, and PET4 (Fig. 7A). We also assessed CD133 expression by flow cytometry. The percentages of CD133+ cells for PET1 (6.3%), PET3 (6.1%), and PET4 (6.8%) were similar to that of EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells (6.0%). However, the percentages of CD133+ cells were increased for PET2 (16%), PET5 (12%), and PET6 (14%). Hence, the lines with the greatest potency for tumor formation also had the highest percentage of CD133+ cells. These results indicate that EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells underwent tumor progression to more aggressive PET2, PET5, and PET6 cells.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
CD133 expression, tumor latency, and frequency of chromosomal rearrangements. (A) The percentage of CD133+ cells versus tumor latency. All of the PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10)−/− EGFRvIII (activated epidermal (more ...)
To further analyze tumor progression, we determined the karyotypes of our original four cultures and six PET lines. The GFP PTEN+/+, EGFRvIII PTEN+/+, and GFP PTEN−/− cells had essentially normal karyotypes (data not shown). EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells had multiple chromosomal aberrations (Fig. 8). Additional chromosomal aberrations were noted for the PET cells. The PET1 and PET5 lines were hypertriploid and triploid, respectively. PET2 was near diploid, with numerous chromosomal aberrations. Chromosomes 15 and 17 were derived from three different chromosomes. A striking observation is that the EGFRvIII PTEN−/− line and five of six PET lines had chromosome 15 translocations. These results led us to test two additional, independently derived EGFRvIII PTEN−/− lines. Each of these lines had a chromosome 15 translocation [der(11)t(11;15) and der(15)t(15;11); data not shown].
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Karyotypes determined by spectral karyotyping. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10)+/+, EGFRvIII (activated epidermal growth factor receptor) PTEN+/+, and GFP PTEN−/− cells had (more ...)
We pooled karyotype data for three EGFRvIII PTEN−/− lines and six PET lines. Chromosome 15 was rearranged in far more cell lines than any other chromosome (Fig. 7B). Currently, we are mapping the chromosome 15 break points so that we can elucidate the functional consequences of these rearrangements.
Growth of Intracranial Tumors
We next assessed whether PET cells can form tumors in mouse brain and whether these tumors are diffuse. We made intracranial injections of PET2 cells into 10 immunodeficient mice. After 4 weeks, two of these mice became less active and began to lose weight. These mice were sacrificed after 6 weeks and found to have brain tumors (Fig. 9A). The tumors were highly cellular and showed focal invasion of normal parenchyma, including white matter tracts (Fig. 9B, C). There also was apparent infiltration along blood vessels (data not shown). These tumors were positive for both GFAP and nestin (data not shown). Both of these mice also had intraventricular tumors (Fig. 9A, D). We did not observe areas of necrosis in these tumors.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
PET2 cells form intracranial tumors. (A) Low-power micrograph showing primary tumor and smaller tumor nodules in the parenchyma and lateral ventricle (LV), and rectangles mark areas magnified in B–D. (B) Higher-magnification micrograph of primary (more ...)
Because some glioblastomas show both EGFRvIII expression and PTEN loss,2123,29 we tested whether these mutations would transform neural precursor cells. We found that these two lesions, but not the single lesions, transformed the cells and induced tumors. Furthermore, during tumor formation, the cells became more aggressive, as reflected by more rapid formation of tumors, a greater percentage of CD133+ cells, and additional chromosomal aberrations. The vascular hypercellular tumors formed in this model contained undifferentiated spindle-shaped cells expressing GFAP and nestin but not neuronal (NeuN and synaptophysin) or oligodendroglial (O4) markers. These cells showed nuclear pleomorphism and had high mitotic activity. In this orthotopic transplantation model, there was infiltration of ventricles, normal parenchyma, and white matter tracts. There also appeared to be infiltration along blood vessels. Subcutaneous, but not intracranial, tumors included areas of coagulative necrosis. This result may be due to the smaller size of the intracranial tumors, as suggested for tumors derived from human cancer stem cells.49 Hence, EGFR activation and PTEN loss act together to transform cells to form tumors that resemble human glioblastomas.
How do these two genetic lesions alter cell signaling and thereby regulate cell proliferation, apoptosis, and chromosomal stability? Although EGFRvIII activates Akt kinase in fibroblasts,15 we observed only a slight activation in the neural precursor cells (Fig. 4A). Another study reported that EGFRvIII activation of PI3K varied depending on cell type.50 In our study, the combination of EGFRvIII expression and PTEN loss robustly activated Akt (Fig. 4A, B). We also observed activation of the RAS/ERK pathway in EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells (Fig. 4A, B). By DNA sequencing, we did not detect activating mutations of RAS genes (Candace Gilbert, unpublished results). The synergistic activation of the RAS/ERK pathway by EGFRvIII expression and PTEN loss may be due to phosphorylation of MEK by 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1).51
Do EGFRvIII expression and PTEN loss affect properties commonly associated with cell transformation? EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells had increased proliferation, even with suboptimum levels of growth factors, and showed enhanced migration and invasiveness. Activation of the RAS/ERK and PI3K/Akt pathways enhances cell proliferation and invasiveness.36,43,5255 EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells were resistant to H2O2 and ionizing radiation. EGFRvIII expression and PTEN loss acted synergistically to increase the percentage of CD133+ cells, neurosphere formation, and colony formation. Aggressive brain tumors in the clinic also show increased CD133 expression and self-renewal assessed by neurosphere formation.56 Activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway enhances self-renewal of fetal neural precursor cells57 and embryonic stem (ES) cells.58 Activation of the RAS/ ERK pathway enhances self-renewal of ES cells.59
Even in the absence of environmental insults, EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells showed DNA damage, which likely occurs by several mechanisms. Consistent with an earlier study,45 we found that loss of PTEN led to phosphorylation of Chk1 on ser280, a site phosphorylated by Akt kinase. Phosphorylation on ser280 prevents phosphorylation on ser345 of Chk1 in response to ionizing irradiation. EGFRvIII did not affect these processes. For GFP PTEN−/− and EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells, we detected γ-H2AX even in the absence of ionizing radiation. Some human tumors also show γ-H2AX staining in the absence of ionizing radiation.60,61 The simplest model to explain our observation is that PTEN loss leads to phosphorylation and inhibition of Chk1.45 Loss of functional Chk1 can lead to induction of γ-H2AX and chromosomal instability in the absence of ionizing radiation,6265 likely reflecting the role of Chk1 in normal cell division.66,67 In addition, loss of PTEN from the centromeres may contribute to these rearrangements.46 We also observed centrosome amplification for EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells. EGFRvIII expression or PTEN loss did not lead to centrosome amplification. We can offer several possible explanations. First, levels of Aurora A and B were elevated and may contribute to centrosome amplification.48 Constitutive activation of the RAS/ERK pathway may lead to upregulation of Aurora A.68,69 Second, inhibition of Chk1 function has been suggested as a cause of aneuploidy in PTEN-negative tumors.45,70
Additional changes occurred during tumor formation in mice. All of the PET lines have decreased latent periods for tumor formation. The PET2, PET5, and PET6 cells had especially short latent periods for tumor induction as well as increased percentages of CD133+ cells. In addition, each of the PET lines has a unique karyotype. We propose a model to explain this genomic instability. The genome of EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells is inherently unstable. The double-strand breaks indicated by γ-H2AX staining for EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells may facilitate chromosomal translocations.71 In addition, the propensity of these cells to undergo centrosome amplification may lead to aneuploidy. Because these cells are resistant to apoptosis, an increased number of cells undergoing DNA damage survive, allowing new clones with novel karyotypes to emerge.
The variety of karyotypes for the EGFRvIII PTEN−/− cells and the PET lines suggests that multiple chromosomal rearrangements contribute to tumor evolution. However, one change was common to many of these lines: eight of nine EGFRvIII PTEN−/− lines had a translocation involving chromosome 15. The recurrent chromosome 15 translocations indicate that there is an important oncogene or tumor suppressor near these translocations. Identification of this gene is an important topic for future studies.
Acknowledgments
We thank Jonas Ekstrand for EGFRvIII coding sequence, Marie-Claire Daou and Taichang Jang for technical help, Yu Liu and S.Y. Wang for preparation of tumor sections, Ruibao Ren for retroviral vector and Dan Ory for packaging cell line, Candace Gilbert for RAS gene analysis, Ramon Parsons for anti-phospho-Chk1 antibody, David Weaver for help with intracranial injections, and Steve Doxsey, Jack Rosa, Lucio Castillo, Steve Jones, Tim Kowalik, and Tom Smith for helpful discussions. The University of Massachusetts Flow Cytometry Center sorted GFP-labeled cells. This work was supported in part by NIH NS21716, the Intramural Program of the Human Genome Research Institute, the Goldhirsh Foundation, and the Worcester Foundation.
1. Maher EA, Furnari FB, Bachoo RM, et al. Malignant glioma: genetics and biology of a grave matter. Genes Dev. 2001;15:1311–1333. [PubMed]
2. Ge H, Gong X, Tang CK. Evidence of high incidence of EGFRvIII expression and coexpression with EGFR in human invasive breast cancer by laser capture microdissection and immunohistochemical analysis. Int J Cancer. 2002;98:357–361. [PubMed]
3. Wikstrand CJ, Reist CJ, Archer GE, Zalutsky MR, Bigner DD. The class III variant of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRvIII): characterization and utilization as an immunotherapeutic target. J Neurovirol. 1998;4:148–158. [PubMed]
4. Moscatello DK, Holgado-Madruga M, Godwin AK, et al. Frequent expression of a mutant epidermal growth factor receptor in multiple human tumors. Cancer Res. 1995;55:5536–5539. [PubMed]
5. La A, Glazer CA, Martinson HM, et al. Mutant epidermal growth factor receptor up-regulates molecular effectors of tumor invasion. Cancer Res. 2002;62:3335–3339. [PubMed]
6. Huang HS, Nagane M, Klingbeil CK, et al. The enhanced tumorigenic activity of a mutant epidermal growth factor receptor common in human cancers is mediated by threshold levels of constitutive tyrosine phosphorylation and unattenuated signaling. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:2927–2935. [PubMed]
7. Holland EC, Hively WP, DePinho RA, Varmus HE. A constitutively active epidermal growth factor receptor cooperates with disruption of G1 cell-cycle arrest pathways to induce glioma-like lesions in mice. Genes Dev. 1998;12:3675–3685. [PubMed]
8. Bachoo RM, Maher EA, Ligon KL, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor and Ink4a/Arf. Convergent mechanisms governing terminal differentiation and transformation along the neural stem cell to astrocyte axis. Cancer Cell. 2002;1:269–277. [PubMed]
9. Ding H, Shannon P, Lau N, et al. Oligodendrogliomas result from the expression of an activated mutant epidermal growth factor receptor in a RAS transgenic mouse astrocytoma model. Cancer Res. 2003;63:1106–1113. [PubMed]
10. Boockvar JA, Kapitonov D, Kapoor G, et al. Constitutive EGFR signaling confers a motile phenotype to neural stem cells. Mol Cell Neuro -sci. 2003;24:1116–1130. [PubMed]
11. Moscatello DK, Montgomery RB, Sundareshan P, et al. Transformational and altered signal transduction by a naturally occurring mutant EGF receptor. Oncogene. 1996;13:85–96. [PubMed]
12. Montgomery RB, Moscatello DK, Wong AJ, Cooper JA, Stahl WL. Differential modulation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase/ extracellular signal-related kinase kinase and MAP kinase activities by a mutant epidermal growth factor receptor. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:30562–30566. [PubMed]
13. Antonyak MA, Moscatello DK, Wong AJ. Constitutive activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase by a mutant epidermal growth factor receptor. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:2817–2822. [PubMed]
14. Lorimer IA, Lavictoire SJ. Activation of extracellular-regulated kinases by normal and mutant EGF receptors. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1538:1–9. [PubMed]
15. Moscatello DK, Holgado-Madruga M, Emlet DR, Montgomery RB, Wong AJ. Constitutive activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase by a naturally occurring mutant epidermal growth factor receptor. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:200–206. [PubMed]
16. Li J, Yen C, Liaw D, et al. PTEN, a putative protein tyrosine phosphatase gene mutated in human brain, breast, and prostate cancer. Science. 1997;275:1943–1947. [PubMed]
17. Steck PA, Pershouse MA, Jasser SA, et al. Identification of a candidate tumour suppressor gene, MMAC1, at chromosome 10q23.3 that is mutated in multiple advanced cancers. Nat Genet. 1997;15:356–362. [PubMed]
18. Xiao A, Wu H, Pandolfi PP, Louis DN, Van Dyke T. Astrocyte inactivation of the pRb pathway predisposes mice to malignant astrocytoma development that is accelerated by PTEN mutation. Cancer Cell. 2002;1:157–168. [PubMed]
19. Simpson L, Parsons R. PTEN: life as a tumor suppressor. Exp Cell Res. 2001;264:29–41. [PubMed]
20. Maehama T, Dixon JE. The tumor suppressor, PTEN/MMAC1, dephosphorylates the lipid second messenger, phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:13375–13378. [PubMed]
21. Smith JS, Tachibana I, Passe SM, et al. PTEN mutation, EGFR amplification, and outcome in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1246–1256. [PubMed]
22. Von Deimling A, Louis DN, von Ammon K, et al. Association of epidermal growth factor receptor gene amplification with loss of chromosome 10 in human glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurosurg. 1992;77:295–301. [PubMed]
23. Houillier C, Lejeune J, Benouaich-Amiel A, et al. Prognostic impact of molecular markers in a series of 220 primary glioblastomas. Cancer. 2006;106:2218–2223. [PubMed]
24. Tohma Y, Gratas C, Biernat W, et al. PTEN (MMAC1) mutations are frequent in primary glioblastomas (de novo) but not in secondary glioblastomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1998;57:684–689. [PubMed]
25. Choe G, Horvath S, Cloughesy TF, et al. Analysis of the phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase signaling pathway in glioblastoma patients in vivo. Cancer Res. 2003;63:2742–2746. [PubMed]
26. Bianco R, Shin I, Ritter CA, et al. Loss of PTEN/MMAC1/TEP in EGF receptor-expressing tumor cells counteracts the antitumor action of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Oncogene. 2003;22:2812–2822. [PubMed]
27. Klingler-Hoffmann M, Bukczynska P, Tiganis T. Inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling negates the growth advantage imparted by a mutant epidermal growth factor receptor on human glioblastoma cells. Int J Cancer. 2003;105:331–339. [PubMed]
28. She QB, Solit D, Basso A, Moasser MM. Resistance to gefitinib in PTEN-null HER-overexpressing tumor cells can be overcome through restoration of PTEN function or pharmacologic modulation of constitutive phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase/Akt pathway signaling. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:4340–4346. [PubMed]
29. Mellinghoff IK, Wang MY, Vivanco I, et al. Molecular determinants of the response of glioblastomas to EGFR kinase inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2012–2024. [PubMed]
30. Wei Q, Clarke L, Scheidenhelm DK, et al. High-grade glioma formation results from postnatal PTEN loss or mutant epidermal growth factor receptor expression in a transgenic mouse glioma model. Cancer Res. 2006;66:7429–7437. [PubMed]
31. Zhang X, Ren R. Bcr-Abl efficiently induces a myeloproliferative disease and production of excess interleukin-3 and granulocyte- macrophage colony-stimulating factor in mice: a novel model for chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood. 1998;92:3829–3840. [PubMed]
32. Ory DS, Neugeboren BA, Mulligan RC. A stable human-derived packaging cell line for production of high titer retrovirus/vesicular stomatitis virus G pseudotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:11400–11406. [PubMed]
33. Reynolds BA, Tetzlaff W, Weiss S. A multipotent EGF-responsive striatal embryonic progenitor cell produces neurons and astrocytes. J Neurosci. 1992;12:4565–4574. [PubMed]
34. Trotman LC, Niki M, Dotan ZA, et al. PTEN dose dictates cancer progression in the prostate. PLoS Biol. 2003;1:385–396. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Chen Z, Trotman LC, Shaffer D, et al. Crucial role of p53-dependent cellular senescence in suppression of PTEN-deficient tumorigenesis. Nature. 2005;436:725–730. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Li L, Liu F, Salmonsen RA, et al. PTEN in neural precursor cells: regulation of migration, apoptosis, and proliferation. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2002;20:21–29. [PubMed]
37. Schrock E, du Manoir S, Veldman T, et al. Multicolor spectral karyotyping of human chromosomes. Science. 1996;273:494–497. [PubMed]
38. Liyanage M, Coleman A, du Manoir S, et al. Multicolour spectral karyotyping of mouse chromosomes. Nat Genet. 1996;14:312–315. [PubMed]
39. Groszer M, Erickson R, Scripture-Adams DD, et al. Negative regulation of neural stem/progenitor cell proliferation by the Pten tumor suppressor gene in vivo. Science. 2001;294:2186–2189. [PubMed]
40. Vescovi AL, Reynolds BA, Fraser DD, Weiss S. bFGF regulates the proliferative fate of unipotent (neuronal) and bipotent (neuronal/astroglial) EGF-generated CNS progenitor cells. Neuron. 1993;11:951–966. [PubMed]
41. Rong Y, Durden DL, Van Meir EG, Brat DJ. “Pseudopalisading” necrosis in glioblastoma: a familiar morphologic feature that links vascular pathology, hypoxia, and angiogenesis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2006;65:529–539. [PubMed]
42. Rietze RL, Valcanis H, Brooker GF, et al. Purification of a pluripotent neural stem cell from the adult mouse brain. Nature. 2001;412:736–739. [PubMed]
43. Mawrin C, Diete S, Treuheit T, et al. Prognostic relevance of MAPK expression in glioblastoma multiforme. Int J Oncol. 2003;23:641–648. [PubMed]
44. Antonyak MA, Kenyon LC, Godwin AK, et al. Elevated JNK activation contributes to the pathogenesis of human brain tumors. Oncogene. 2002;21:5038–5046. [PubMed]
45. Puc J, Keniry M, Li HS, et al. Lack of PTEN sequesters CHK1 and initiates genetic instability. Cancer Cell. 2005;7:193–204. [PubMed]
46. Shen WH, Balajee AS, Wang J, et al. Essential role for nuclear PTEN in maintaining chromosomal integrity. Cell. 2007;128:157–170. [PubMed]
47. Pihan GA, Purohit A, Wallace J, et al. Centrosome defects and genetic instability in malignant tumors. Cancer Res. 1998;58:3974–3985. [PubMed]
48. Meraldi P, Honda R, Nigg EA. Aurora-A overexpression reveals tetraploidization as a major route to centrosome amplification in p53−/− cells. EMBO J. 2002;21:483–492. [PubMed]
49. Galli R, Binda E, Orfanelli U, et al. Isolation and characterization of tumorigenic, stem-like neural precursors from human glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 2004;64:7011–7021. [PubMed]
50. Li B, Yuan M, Kim IA, et al. Mutant epidermal growth factor receptor displays increased signaling through the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/AKT pathway and promotes radioresistance in cells of astrocytic origin. Oncogene. 2004;23:4594–4602. [PubMed]
51. Sato S, Fujita N, Tsuruo T. Involvement of 3-phosphoinositide- dependent protein kinase-1 in the MEK/MAPK signal transduction pathway. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:33759–33767. [PubMed]
52. Byun HJ, Hong IK, Kim E, et al. A splice variant of CD99 increases motility and MMP-9 expression of human breast cancer cells through the AKT-, ERK-, and JNK-dependent AP-1 activation signaling pathways. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:34833–34847. [PubMed]
53. Li M, Ng SS, Wang J, et al. EFA6A enhances glioma cell invasion through ADP ribosylation factor 6/extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling. Cancer Res. 2006;66:1583–1590. [PubMed]
54. Di Cristofano A, Kotsi P, Peng YF, et al. Impaired Fas response and autoimmunity in PTEN+/− mice. Science. 1999;285:2122–2125. [PubMed]
55. Kotelevets L, van Hengel J, Bruyneel E, et al. The lipid phosphatase activity of PTEN is critical for stabilizing intercellular junctions and reverting invasiveness. J Cell Biol. 2001;155:1129–1136. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Singh SK, Clarke ID, Terasaki M, et al. Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. Cancer Res. 2003;63:5821–5828. [PubMed]
57. Groszer M, Erickson R, Scripture-Adams DD, et al. PTEN negatively regulates neural stem cell self-renewal by modulating G0–G1 cell cycle entry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:111–116. [PubMed]
58. Paling NR, Wheadon H, Bone HK, Welham MJ. Regulation of embryonic stem cell self-renewal by phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent signaling. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:48063–48070. [PubMed]
59. Nakamura Y, Yujiri T, Nawata R, Tagami K, Tanizawa Y. MEK kinase 1 is essential for Bcr-Abl-induced STAT3 and self-renewal activity in embryonic stem cells. Oncogene. 2005;24:7592–7598. [PubMed]
60. Gorgoulis VG, Vassiliou LV, Karakaidos P, et al. Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions. Nature. 2005;434:907–913. [PubMed]
61. Mahrhofer H, Burger S, Oppitz U, Flentje M, Djuzenova CS. Radiation induced DNA damage and damage repair in human tumor and fibro-blast cell lines assessed by histone H2AX phosphorylation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:573–580. [PubMed]
62. Puc J, Parsons R. PTEN loss inhibits CHK1 to cause double stranded-DNA breaks in cells. Cell Cycle. 2005;4:927–929. [PubMed]
63. Syljuasen RG, Sorensen CS, Hansen LT, et al. Inhibition of human Chk1 causes increased initiation of DNA replication, phosphorylation of ATR targets, and DNA breakage. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:3553–3562. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
64. Cho SH, Toouli CD, Fujii GH, Crain C, Parry D. Chk1 is essential for tumor cell viability following activation of the replication checkpoint. Cell Cycle. 2005;4:131–139. [PubMed]
65. Durkin SG, Arlt MF, Howlett NG, Glover TW. Depletion of CHK1, but not CHK2, induces chromosomal instability and breaks at common fragile sites. Oncogene. 2006;25:4381–4388. [PubMed]
66. Shtivelman E, Sussman J, Stokoe D. A role for PI 3-kinase and PKB activity in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle. Curr Biol. 2002;12:919–924. [PubMed]
67. Schmitt E, Boutros R, Froment C, et al. CHK1 phosphorylates CDC25B during the cell cycle in the absence of DNA damage. J Cell Sci. 2006;119:4269–4275. [PubMed]
68. Katayama H, Brinkley WR, Sen S. The Aurora kinases: role in cell transformation and tumorigenesis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2003;22:451–464. [PubMed]
69. Furukawa T, Kanai N, Shiwaku HO, Soga N, Uehara A, Horii A. AURKA is one of the downstream targets of MAPK1/ERK2 in pancreatic cancer. Oncogene. 2006;25:4831–4839. [PubMed]
70. Kramer A, Mailand N, Lukas C, et al. Centrosome-associated Chk1 prevents premature activation of cyclin-B-Cdk1 kinase. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:884–891. [PubMed]
71. Franco S, Gostissa M, Zha S, et al. H2AX prevents DNA breaks from progressing to chromosome breaks and translocations. Mol Cell. 2006;21:201–214. [PubMed]
Articles from Neuro-Oncology are provided here courtesy of
Society for Neuro-Oncology and Oxford University Press