PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmcmeduBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Medical Education
 
BMC Med Educ. 2009; 9: 47.
Published online Jul 20, 2009. doi:  10.1186/1472-6920-9-47
PMCID: PMC2718872
Micro-expression recognition training in medical students: a pilot study
Jennifer Endres#1 and Anita Laidlawcorresponding author#1
1Bute Medical School, University of St Andrews, Westburn Lane, St Andrews, Fife, UK
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
#Contributed equally.
Jennifer Endres: jbenson45/at/web.de; Anita Laidlaw: ahl1/at/st-andrews.ac.uk
Received February 3, 2009; Accepted July 20, 2009.
Abstract
Background
Patients provide emotional cues during consultations which may be verbal or non-verbal. Many studies focus on patient verbal cues as predictors of physicians' ability to recognize and address patient needs but this project focused on non-verbal cues in the form of facial micro-expressions. This pilot study investigated first year medical students' (n = 75) identified as being either good or poor communicators abilities to detect emotional micro-expressions before and after training using the Micro Expression Training Tool (METT) http://www.mettonline.com.
Methods
The sample consisted of 24 first year medical students, 9 were from the lowest performance quartile in a communication skills OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Exam) station and 15 were from the highest performance quartile. These students completed the METT individually, recording pre- and post-assessment scores. Students were also invited to provide their views on the training.
Results
No difference in pre-assessment scores was found between the lowest and highest quartile groups (P = 0.797). After training, students in the high quartile showed significant improvement in the recognition of facial micro-expressions (P = 0.014). The lowest quartile students showed no improvement (P = 0.799).
Conclusion
In conclusion, this pilot study showed there was no difference between the ability of medical undergraduate students assessed as being good communicators and those assessed as poor communicators to identify facial micro-expressions. But, the study did highlight that those students demonstrating good general clinical communication benefited from the training aspect of the METT, whereas low performing students did not gain. Why this should be the case is not clear and further investigation should be carried out to determine why lowest quartile students did not benefit.
Articles from BMC Medical Education are provided here courtesy of
BioMed Central