In this study we demonstrated that the acquired TRAIL resistance is associated with enhanced expression of c-FLIPL and Mcl-1L in H460 lung cancer cells. Modified c-FLIPL was preferentially recruited to the TRAIL DISC and suppressed recruitment and activation of caspase-8, thereby inhibiting the extrinsic apoptosis pathway. The increased Mcl-1L level contributes to suppressing the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway. Inhibition of FLIPL and Mcl-1L expression by RNA interference cooperatively alleviated the acquired TRAIL resistance. Thus, acquired TRAIL resistance to TRAIL-induced cytotoxicity was due to suppressing both the extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis pathways. We further demonstrated that elevated Akt activity is crucial for overexpression of c-FLIPL and Mcl-1L. Similar observations were also made in H1568 and A549 cells (data not shown). Collectively, data from this study demonstrate that the Akt-mediated increase of c-FLIPL and Mcl-1L levels underlies the main mechanism of acquired TRAIL resistance in lung cancer. Therefore, Akt, c-FLIPL, and Mcl-1L could be useful targets for circumventing acquired TRAIL resistance in lung cancer cells.
As a structural homologue of caspase-8, c-FLIP binds FADD, competing with caspase-8 for recruitment to DISC. c-FLIP suppression is assumed to be involved in mediating the sensitization of cancer cells to TNF- or TRAIL-induced apoptosis by cycloheximide or the transcription inhibitor actinomycin D (
29). In several types of cancers, increased c-FLIP expression is correlated with resistance to TRAIL-, Fas- or TNF-induced apoptosis (
21,
23,
30-
32). However, the mechanisms underlying the c-FLIP expression increase have not been well elucidated. Post-translational modification and degradation of c-FLIP as well as increased mRNA levels have been suggested to be involved in increasing c-FLIP expression (
24). In this study chronic TRAIL exposure induced c-FLIP
L expression in lung cancer cells, likely through post-transcriptional regulation. Although both the long- and short-forms of c-FLIP were increased, only c-FLIP
L was preferentially recruited to the TRAIL DISC. Because the recruited c-FLIP
L was the proteolyzed form (p43) and the extent of c-FLIP
L recruitment to the DISC was enhanced in relation to the protein expression levels (), it is plausible that an unidentified mechanism that modifies c-FLIP
L may have been activated during chronic TRAIL exposure to facilitate recruitment of c-FLIP
L to the DISC. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that although both c-FLIP
L and c-FLIP
s are apoptosis inhibitors, their contributions to apoptosis regulation, specifically to acquired TRAIL resistance, could be distinct. c-FLIP
L was reported to be more significant in cancer cells’ resistance to therapy (
21,
30). Interestingly, increased c-FLIP
s did not block apoptosis induced by TRAIL plus the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (
33).
Increased expression of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members such as Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 is associated with cancer cells’ resistance to therapy, suggesting that the intrinsic pathway also plays a role in resistance to therapeutics (
34). Mcl-1 is involved in lung cancer cells’ resistance to apoptosis induced by chemotherapeutics, ionizing radiation, and TRAIL (
35,
36). Mcl-1
L can block the tBid-mediated activation of the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway induced by TRAIL (
15). Of the two Mcl-1 isoforms, Mcl-l
L is widely regarded as an anti-apoptosis factor while Mcl-1
S is found to be proapoptotic (
37). Thus, an increase in the ratio of Mcl-1
L to Mcl-1
S would elevate the apoptosis threshold in cancer cells. Interestingly, we show that the expression of Mcl-1
L but not Mcl-1
S was dramatically increased after chronic exposure to TRAIL. The increased Mcl-1
L expression was correlated with inhibiting TRAIL-induced cytochrome C release from mitochondria and activation of caspase-9. Knockdown of Mcl-1
L partially alleviated TRAIL resistance, indicating that suppressing the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway by Mcl-1
L at least is partly involved in the mechanism of acquired TRAIL resistance.
We further found that increased Akt activity is accompanied by acquired TRAIL resistance in lung cancer cells. Suppressing Akt activity with the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 or Akt siRNA suppressed expression of both c-FLIP
L and Mcl-1
L. This finding is consistent with other reports showing that Akt regulates these two survival factors in cancer cells (
26,
38) and with our recent findings that inhibited Akt activity dramatically sensitizes lung cancer cells to TNF- or TRAIL-induced cytotoxicity (
17,
39). While our data suggest that Akt may enhance the expression of c-FLIP
L and Mcl-1
L by affecting the protein degradation pathway, the exact mechanisms underlying such enhancement is not clear currently. As a glycogen-synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) inhibitor, Akt may increase the stability of Mcl-1 by suppressing GSK3β. Phosphorylation of Mcl-1 by GSK3 recently has been shown to enhance Mcl-1 protein turnover (
40). Akt activation also was associated with suppressing GSK3 and increasing the c-FLIP expression level (
41). Whether the regulation of Mcl-1 and c-FLIP is activated through the same mechanism and whether it involves GSK3 remains to be elucidated.
Direct evidence showing that increased expression of c-FLIP
L and Mcl-1
L is the main determinant of acquired TRAIL resistance in lung cancer cells came from the siRNA knockdown experiment in which concurrent knockdown of these two proteins additively sensitized H460-TR cells to TRAIL-induced cytotoxicity. Therefore, c-FLIP
L and Mcl-1
L could be ideal molecular targets for attenuating acquired TRAIL resistance to lung cancer. It is remarkable that TRAIL can stimulate TRAIL-resistant cancer cells’ proliferation and metastasis (
8). If it arises during therapy, such acquired TRAIL resistance would shift the TRAIL treatment from beneficial to detrimental. Thus, preventing or attenuating acquired TRAIL resistance by targeting c-FLIP
L and Mcl-1
L could be crucial in retaining TRAIL’s cancer-killing activity and circumventing its cancer promoting potential.
In vivo experiments with animal models are needed to verify the effect of this approach in sensitizing TRAIL for lung cancer therapy.