|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
We describe new T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic mice (relapsing-remitting [RR] mice) carrying a TCR specific for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) peptide 92–106 in the context of I-As. Backcrossed to the SJL/J background, most RR mice spontaneously develop RR experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) with episodes often altering between different central nervous system tissues like the cerebellum, optic nerve, and spinal cord. Development of spontaneous EAE depends on the presence of an intact B cell compartment and on the expression of MOG autoantigen. There is no spontaneous EAE development in B cell–depleted mice or in transgenic mice lacking MOG. Transgenic T cells seem to expand MOG autoreactive B cells from the endogenous repertoire. The expanded autoreactive B cells produce autoantibodies binding to a conformational epitope on the native MOG protein while ignoring the T cell target peptide. The secreted autoantibodies are pathogenic, enhancing demyelinating EAE episodes. RR mice constitute the first spontaneous animal model for the most common form of multiple sclerosis (MS), RR MS.
Autoimmune diseases can affect most organs of the body including liver, heart, the endocrine system, the musculoskeletal apparatus, and the central nervous system (CNS). They commonly start off at a young age and then last throughout life, often resulting in severe disability. The factors that trigger the onset, modulate the course, and determine the clinical character of autoimmune diseases have remained obscure, a deficit of knowledge which sets limits to the design of specific and efficient therapies.
Yet there is increasing evidence that organ-specific autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, type 1 diabetes mellitus, and multiple sclerosis (MS), are the result of a pathogenic interaction of autoimmune T and B cells. There is substantial information on the role of T cells in organ-specific autoimmunity. Some act as effector cells attacking self-tissues, either directly or via recruiting accessory cells like macrophages. Other T cells regulate the time course of the response and still others provide help to autoantibody-producing B cells. The contribution of autoimmune B cells to the inflammatory pathogenesis seems to be complex as well. Beyond producing humoral autoantibodies, B cells serve as APCs activating pathogenic T cells, and, through their capacity of releasing cytokines, B cells are involved in shaping local microenvironments favorable to evolving cellular autoimmune responses.
Deciphering the interactions between T and B cells in the spontaneous development of organ-specific autoimmune responses requires suitable animal models. Naturally occurring models are available for type 1 diabetes mellitus and systemic lupus erythematosus but not for autoimmunity in the CNS (1). Recently, we and others described a double-transgenic mouse model, which simulates opticospinal MS (OSMS) remarkably well, a variant of which is also known as Devic's disease (2, 3). These mice, termed opticospinal experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE [OSE]) mice, express myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)–specific receptors on T and B cells and spontaneously develop demyelinating inflammatory disease at frequencies >50%. Like in human OSMS (4), the lesions in affected mice are restricted to optic nerve and spinal cord, and, in most cases, the disease takes a chronic progressive course without remissions and marked relapses. It should, however, be noted that the type of MS that most prevalently affects Caucasian populations differs fundamentally from OSMS (5). Typically, MS starts out with a relapsing-remitting (RR) course, where disease episodes may completely resolve only to be followed by a subsequent relapse. In this disease variant, the pathogenic lesions, demyelinating plaques, may be located throughout the CNS, thus causing the notoriously varied neurological defect patterns.
In this paper, we describe a new transgenic mouse model that spontaneously develops RR-EAE and, thus, recapitulates the “Western” variant of MS. Furthermore, and most importantly, we found that in these mice transgenic autoimmune T cells expand autoimmune B cells from the endogenous immune repertoire and guide them to produce antibodies against conformational epitopes of the MOG protein, which, together with complement, may initiate the destruction of MOG-expressing target cells.
We generated transgenic mice expressing a TCR specific for the rat/mouse MOG peptide 92–106 in the context of I-As. This TCR, which uses Vα8.3 and Vβ4 genes, was derived from a MOG-specific encephalitogenic Th1-CD4+ T cell clone isolated from a WT SJL/J mouse immunized against recombinant rat MOG (rMOG; Fig. S1). We selected three founder lines differing in markedly distinct proportions of transgenic Vα8.3+/Vβ4+ CD4+ T cells in central and peripheral immune repertoires (Fig. 1 A and Fig. S2). In low frequency TCR1586 mice, 18% of single-positive CD4+CD8− thymocytes expressed the transgenic TCR. The proportion was 75% in medium frequency TCR1639 mice and 99% in high frequency TCR1640 mice (Fig. 1 A). In all three transgenic mouse lines, transgene expression levels in the peripheral immune system were proportional to the ones in the central thymic repertoires (Fig. S2).
The density of the transgenic TCR on the surface of mature CD4+ T cells in the spleen varied markedly (Fig. S2). Especially in high frequency TCR1640 spleens, T cells could be distinguished based on the low and high densities of surface TCR (dim and bright TCR). The dim TCR population expressed higher levels of CD25 and CD69 and lower levels of CD62L (unpublished data).
Stimulation of nonimmunized transgenic spleen cells with rMOG or MOG92-106 peptide in vitro led to dose-dependent proliferative responses (Fig. 1 B). Concomitant cytokine responses largely followed the proliferation pattern. Although the secretion of proinflammatory IFN-γ, IL-17, and antiinflammatory IL-10 was similar in TCR1640 and TCR1639 lines, IL-2 secretion was higher in TCR1639 T cells. The Th2-related cytokines IL-4 and IL-5 were absent in nearly all samples tested (Fig. 1 C).
While continuously backcrossing the line TCR1640 into the SJL/J background, we noted spontaneous EAE-like disease developing at a high frequency (Fig. 2 A and Table S1). In the eighth backcross generation, >80% of all females developed EAE within 160 d. During the same period, the EAE rate in males was >60%. EAE was rare in transgenic SJL/J mice with low frequency TCR1586 and surprisingly absent in medium frequency TCR1639 mice and in Mog-deficient TCR1640 (TCR1640 × Mog−/−) mice (Table S1).
We and others previously described a double-transgenic mouse strain, OSE mice (2, 3), which expressed a MOG-specific TCR transgene, 2D2 (specific for MOG peptide 35–55 in context of I-Ab), along with the gene coding for the rearranged IgH variable chain of the classical anti-MOG monoclonal antibody, 8.18-C5 (IgHMOG mice) (6). We have now created similar double-transgenic mice by mating TCR1640 SJL/J mice to IgHMOG on SJL/J background. Double-transgenic TCR1640 × IgHMOG mice developed spontaneous EAE very similar to TCR1640 single transgenics, with some apparently minor differences. Almost all double-transgenic females came down with disease by 120 d of age, whereas males of the same age showed an EAE rate of <40%. This gender gap was highly significant but narrowed during the subsequent weeks (Fig. 2 A).
We also crossed IgHMOG mice to the medium and low frequency lines TCR1639 and TCR1586, respectively. Only 1 out of 17 medium frequency TCR1639 × IgHMOG mice displayed EAE and none of the low frequency TCR1586 × IgHMOG showed any clinical symptoms (Table S1).
The CNS disease spontaneously developing in TCR transgenic SJL/J mice differed dramatically from spontaneous OSE seen in OSE mice (2, 3). In TCR transgenic SJL/J mice, single-transgenic TCR1640 mice, and double-transgenic TCR1640 × IgHMOG mice, disease was extremely variable both in course and clinical nature. Typically, in females EAE started with an RR course. Often, the first attacks resolved completely but were followed by further bouts. Intriguingly, individual EAE bouts often differed radically in their neurological defects. In a substantial number of cases, the initial bout was dominated by ataxia rather than by classical EAE defects. Affected mice were unable to walk along a straight line, deviating and falling to the side, but did not show limb weakness or paralysis (Video 1). In many cases, the mice recovered completely until a first relapse, which commonly showed a completely different clinical picture, for example, hind limb paralysis as seen in typical EAE. Again, this second disease episode subsided, giving way to partial remission. Later disease episodes mostly showed classical paralytic EAE (Table I and Fig. S3).
Although there was no clear distinction between single- and double-transgenic SJL/J mice, EAE course differed between females and males. As detailed in Table I, RR disease was more common in females. A minority of female mice developed progressive EAE from the beginning, but more than half of the males developed primary progressive EAE.
The clinical deficiencies developing in affected mice were reflected by the location and character of underlying CNS lesions. Ataxic mice displayed large inflammatory and demyelinated lesions in cerebellum and brain stem (Fig. 2 B). In contrast, in mice suffering from conventional EAE, lesions were distributed throughout the spinal cord, brain stem, and optic nerve (Table S2).
Irrespective of their location within the CNS, the inflammatory lesions were characterized by numerous CD3+ T cells in the middle of a plethora of Mac3-positive activated macrophage-like cells (Fig. 2 B). The inflammatory infiltrates were embedded in large areas of demyelination and axon destruction. In line with their comparable clinical score, the histological patterns were similar between TCR1640 single-transgenic and TCR1640 × IgHMOG double-transgenic mice (Table S2).
Cytofluorimetric analyses confirmed that, within the CNS, the major infiltrating inflammatory lymphocytes were CD4+ T cells and B cells together with a minor population of macrophages and CD8+ T cells (Fig. 3, A–C), with only minor contributions from CD8+ T cells. Notably, most transgenic CD4+ T cells infiltrating the CNS were activated. Many cells expressed the activation marker CD25 and were CD62L negative (Fig. 3 D). Additionally, infiltrating CD4+ T cells expressed the activation markers CD44, VLA4, and ICOS (unpublished data). Furthermore, a high proportion (>65%) of CNS-infiltrating transgenic T cells partly down-modulated their transgenic Vβ4 and Vα8.3 determinants, which is in contrast to peripheral splenic populations, where the modulated subpopulations comprised less than half of the entire transgenic CD4+ T cell subset (Fig. 3 E).
In agreement with previous EAE studies (7–10), we found CNS-infiltrating Th1 (IFN-γ+/IL-17−) and Th17 (IFN-γ−/IL-17+) cells. Compared with spleen, Th17 cells were enriched in CNS threefold and Th1 cells more than twofold (Fig. 3 F). A substantial part of the activated CD4+CD25+ infiltrate T cells express transcription factor Foxp3, a marker of regulatory T cells (not depicted) (11).
Next, we measured the cytokine milieu in brain and spinal cord of TCR1640 mice in different disease stages by real-time PCR in comparison to rMOG immunized SJL/J mice (Fig. S4). Most cytokines followed an infiltration pattern proportional to CD4 expression. As expected from our infiltrate analysis (Fig. 3), we found expression of both IFN-γ and IL-17 in diseased mice. In accordance with this, TNF-α and IFN-γ inducible protein 10 (IP-10/CXCL10) were strongly up-regulated during disease. Of the Th2 cytokines analyzed (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13), only IL-5 was at measurable levels. This cytokine may support B cell proliferation, differentiation, and antibody secretion (12). The levels of the regulatory cytokine IL-10 and of the T reg cell transcription factor FoxP3 paralleled the observed expression of CD4 in diseased mice. Interestingly, we found no major differences between immunized WT SJL/J mice and TCR1640 mice, which suffered from classical paralytic EAE. In line with their clinical picture, ataxic mice showed higher expression levels of the analyzed genes in brain (which also includes cerebellum and brain stem) than did paralytic relapsed mice. Conversely, expression in spinal cord was higher in paralytic relapsed mice than in ataxic mice. Intriguingly, most analyzed factors were elevated even in healthy TCR1640 mice (score 0) as compared with healthy nontransgenic littermate (NTL) mice, likely indicating subclinical inflammation. Finally, during the remission phase, expression of all analyzed genes dropped down to similar values as in score 0–TCR1640 mice (Fig. S4).
Single-transgenic TCR1640 mice showed evidence of a strong MOG-specific B cell response. Spontaneous EAE lesions of single-transgenic TCR1640 animals displayed prominent deposits of Ig and some activated complement (Fig. 4). Furthermore, the inflamed CNS tissue contained, besides CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes, substantial numbers of B cells (5–40% of infiltrated lymphocytes) expressing CD19 or B220 as revealed by immunocytochemistry and flow cytometry (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 E).
Double-transgenic TCR1640 × IgHMOG animals showed an anti-MOG antibody response dominated by the transgene-specific allotype Igha. In addition, however, a minor part of the MOG-specific antibodies expressed the endogenous nontransgenic Ighb allotype (Fig. 5 B). Both antibody species were switched from IgM to IgG1 (Fig. 5, A and B).
Single-transgenic TCR1640 mice also produced anti-MOG autoantibodies (of endogenous Ighb-allotype) reaching titers similar to those from WT mice immunized with rMOG (Fig. 6 A). The anti-MOG Igs were mainly of IgG1 and IgG2a/b isotypes, with very little IgM. The spontaneously appearing anti-MOG transgenic high frequency TCR1640 mice formed autoantibodies irrespective of their EAE status. This contrasted with low frequency single-transgenic TCR1586, where anti-MOG autoantibodies were noted solely in the few animals with spontaneous EAE but not in resistant mice (Fig. 6 B). Also, mice of the EAE-resistant medium frequency line TCR1639 did not produce spontaneous MOG-specific antibodies. Development of spontaneous MOG antibodies was dependent on the presence of the autoantigen. Sera of MOG-deficient TCR1640 mice (bred on the Mog-deficient [Mog−/−] background [reference 13]) did not contain any MOG-specific antibodies (Fig. 6 B). The B cell response in TCR1640 mice was specific to MOG and did not extend to other autoantigens (Fig. 6 C). In single-transgenic TCR1640 mice, autoantibodies became demonstrable from 5 wk of life and, in our series of measurements, persisted up to 9–10 wk, but very young mice, up to 4 wk of age, had no anti-MOG Igs (IgG1 and IgG2a/b isotypes) (Fig. 6 D).
There is evidence that only autoantibodies directed against conformational epitopes, not linear epitopes, are involved in the pathogenesis of EAE (14) and that SJL/J mice, but not C57BL/6 mice, are able to produce such antibodies upon immunization with rMOG in CFA (15). The anti-MOG autoantibodies formed spontaneously in TCR1640 mice also bound to correctly folded MOG expressed on the surface of transduced EL4 cells and, thus, behaved like the classical anticonformational MOG mAb 8.18-C5 and its H chain transgene in TCR1640 × IgHMOG mice (16) (Fig. 7 A). Binding of autoantibodies from TCR1640 and sick TCR1586 mice to EL4-MOG cells (dilutions of 1:20 and 1:200) followed by rabbit complement (Fig. 7 B) resulted in the specific lysis of the target cells. Sera from healthy TCR1586 and TCR1639 or Mog-deficient TCR1640 did not support lysis (unpublished data).
We confirmed the pathogenic potential of antibodies, in vivo. We immunized WT SJL/J mice with a low dose of PLP 139–151 and with incipient clinical EAE symptoms (between scores 0.5 and 1), we transferred serum either from TCR1640 mice (high titers of anti-MOG antibodies documented by ELISA) or NTLs, and compared the effects with the standard anti-MOG monoclonal antibody 8.18C-5. In mice that had received TCR1640 serum, we noted a statistically significant increase in EAE severity similar to that of 8.18C-5 mAb (Fig. 8 A).
To examine the importance of B cells in the development of spontaneous EAE, we depleted B cells in TCR1640 mice using a monoclonal mouse anti–mouse CD20 antibody. TCR1640 mice were treated with anti-CD20 or isotype control (mouse IgG2a) every 2 wk starting on day 3. This protocol removed the B cells from peripheral blood, as well as spleen and lymph nodes, but left significant numbers of B cells in the bone marrow (Fig. S5, A and B). B cell depletion went along with either complete or partial loss of anti-MOG IgG1 serum autoantibodies (Fig. S5 C). Within an observation period of up to 30 wk, only one out of nine anti-CD20–treated mice presented mild and transient EAE symptoms, whereas in mice receiving control antibody, spontaneous EAE was noted in >85% of the cases (Fig. 8 B and Table S3).
The RR mouse, as described in this paper, is the first transgenic mouse model that recapitulates the major features of RR-MS, the most prevalent type of human inflammatory demyelination. The disease starts spontaneously and, in contrast to OSE mice described previously (2, 3), in most cases takes an RR course, with clinical signs differing between individual bouts. Importantly, development of spontaneous disease goes along with the expansion of myelin autoimmune B cells from the endogenous immune repertoire.
RR mice are transgenic SJL/J mice expressing at high frequency a TCR specific for MOG peptide 92–106 in the context of I-As. RR mice differ substantially from previously created transgenic SJL/J mice expressing TCRs recognizing a dominant peptide of PLP (17). These animals, kept under specific pathogen-free conditions, developed spontaneous disease but, in contrast to RR mice, the disease was mostly progressive without remissions and subsequent relapses.
The course and clinical expression of autoimmune diseases are determined by diverse factors, both genetic and environmental. Indeed, SJL/J mice are predisposed to develop fluctuating disease. Depending on the protocol applied, active immunization against encephalitogenic proteins may trigger RR disease (18). Clearly, this response pattern is facilitated by distinct regulatory genes (19), which may also influence spontaneous EAE developing in RR mice. So far, our breeding results suggest that B10.S mice, which have a distinct genetic background but share the MHC and the TCR transgene with SJL/J RR mice, very rarely develop spontaneous EAE, and in the few cases observed, the disease took a chronic rather than RR course (unpublished data).
Most variants of induced EAE present a stereotypical clinical syndrome with motor deficiencies starting at tail and hind limbs and progressing cranially with ongoing disease. Histologically, this clinical picture is reflected by a caudocranial gradient of inflammatory lesions (20). In a few models, however, additional parts of the CNS are affected. For example, in C57BL/6 mice, MOG-induced EAE has a predilection to affect the optic nerve (2, 3), and cerebellar disease was noted in further antigen/mouse combinations (21, 22). Our RR mouse models are the first to show immune attacks against different CNS parts in subsequent inflammatory relapses. They thus provide a unique paradigm to study the mechanisms underlying the targeting of MS lesions within the CNS during ongoing disease.
Several investigators reported that in RR-EAE actively induced by immunization with encephalitogenic peptides, relapses went along with the T cell reactivity against new epitopes (23), a phenomenon termed “determinant spreading” by Lehmann et al. (24). Recent work by McMahon et al. (25) suggests that in actively induced chronic EAE, initial bouts of CNS inflammation result in the induction of professional APCs within or near the affected CNS target tissue. By taking up myelin antigens and presenting crucial epitope components to newly arrived naive autoreactive T cells, the repertoire of target autoantigens spreads (25). It should, however, be mentioned that determinant spreading, i.e., recruitment of potentially encephalitogenic T cells specific for epitopes other than MOG p92-106, has not been patent in spontaneous disease of our RR mice.
As described recently, in the C57BL/6 OSE model, MOG-reactive TCR transgenic T cells require the presence of MOG-specific B cells to kindle spontaneous EAE at high frequency. In this model, the MOG-specific B cells were transgenic with their germline IgJ region replaced by the rearranged H chain of a MOG-specific mAb (2, 3).
Based on these previous observations, we initially created double-transgenic mice by crossing our new MOG TCR transgenic SJL/J strain with MOG-specific B cell knock-in SJL/J mice. These mice presented with spontaneous RR-EAE at high frequency. Less expected spontaneous EAE was noted also in TCR single-transgenic SJL/J mice with a high proportion of MOG-reactive CD4 T cells but without transgenic B cells. It turned out that in these TCR single-transgenic mice, MOG-specific B cells were expanded from the endogenous B cell compartment. Substantial numbers of B cells were observed to invade the inflammatory lesions, and there were heavy local deposits of Ig along with some activated complement. Most importantly, TCR single transgenics produced high titers of anti-MOG autoantibodies of IgG1 and IgG2 isotypes, which bound to correctly conformed membrane bound autoantigen, destroyed MOG-expressing target cells, and, thus, have demyelinating potential (16).
MOG-reactive B cells are essential for the spontaneous development of RR-EAE. Depletion of B cells by treatment with anti-CD20 mAb profoundly suppressed RR-EAE when started at young age. Treatment of adult mice produced much more inconsistent results, a phenomenon which was recently noted in other investigations in actively induced EAE (26).
B cells contribute to immune and autoimmune responses by secreting humoral antibodies, by acting as APCs, and by releasing cytokines. RR mice, both single and double transgenic, produce MOG-specific autoantibodies that share their dominant isotype, IgG1, with the original demyelinating anti-MOG mAb 8.18-C5 and that, in vivo, aggravate EAE when transferred i.v. (27). Importantly, we found large Ig deposits in the demyelinating lesions of single- and double-transgenic RR mice. At least part of these antibodies may have been produced by local infiltrating B cells. In fact, B cells isolated from CNS infiltrates were found to secrete anti-MOG antibodies at high levels.
Beyond autoantibody secretion, MOG-specific B cells profoundly influence autoimmune responses by directly interacting with autoimmune T cells. In OSE mice, as well as in TCR1640 × IgHMOG mice (unpublished data), MOG-specific B cells concentrate highly diluted MOG and present the antigen to MOG-reactive T cells. Hence, antigen-presenting B cells may contribute to the initiation and progression of spontaneous EAE. But, in addition, B cells may act into the opposite direction; they were shown to limit EAE by releasing IL-10 (28) and by influencing function of regulatory T cells (29).
The spontaneous recruitment and expansion of autoimmune B cells from the endogenous repertoire by organ-specific autoimmune T cells in the absence of exogenous autoantigen represents a mechanism of autoimmunity that has not yet been described. The MOG-specific B cell expansion process critically requires the presence of the endogenous target autoantigen, as Mog-deficient TCR transgenic SJL/J mice never produced anti-MOG autoantibodies, nor did they develop spontaneous RR-EAE.
The role of endogenous MOG is intriguing, considering that this target autoantigen is predominantly confined to the CNS tissues, which are largely inaccessible to circulating T and B cells. This hidden localization distinguishes the RR mouse paradigm from transgenic mice, where activation of virus-specific B cell was noted in the presence of high numbers of virus-specific transgenic CD4+ T cells and a viral pseudo-autoantigen expressed throughout the organism in cell types including DCs and macrophages (30).
Several mechanisms could be involved in MOG-specific B cell expansion. MOG-specific T cells could intrude into the naive CNS and create immunogenic conditions that allow the activation and expansion of naive B cells in the local milieu. This scenario has been forwarded recently as an explanation of epitope spreading in actively induced EAE (25). Alternatively, immunogenic MOG and/or myelin debris could be transported to local lymph nodes, either as cell-free material or by phagocytes, to be presented there to autoreactive B cells (31). Although MOG is predominantly expressed in the CNS, its messenger RNA was also found in some non-CNS organs, such as thymus, spleen, and liver (13, 32, 33), and low protein levels were found in the peripheral nervous system (34). Presentation of very low amounts of peripherally available MOG remains, at least in theory, an alternative mechanism of B cell expansion in RR mice.
Finally, animal models with spontaneously developing EAE show promise for the discovery of new drugs and the validation of existing medications. Thus, the opticospinal type of EAE described previously may represent essential features of human OSMS/Devic's disease (2), a disease variant which is rarely found in high prevalence populations. The spontaneous RR-EAE, with its conspicuous variation of neurological deficiencies, will provide a model for the most frequent type of MS, as it is seen typically in early phases of the disease.
SJL/J mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories. Mog KO mice (13) were backcrossed into SJL/J for seven generations, crossed with TCR1640 transgenic SJL/J mice, and then intercrossed to generate TCR1640 transgenic Mog KO mice. All mouse strains were bred in the animal facilities of the Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology (Martinsried, Germany).
TCR donor clone (C3) was selected from a panel of MOG-specific T cell clones (series SL48) derived from a SJL/J mouse immunized with rMOG in CFA. The encephalitogenic clone C3 uses Vα8.3 along with Vβ4 and recognizes MOG92-106 bound to I-As. Total RNA of clone C3 was isolated by TRI reagent extraction (Sigma-Aldrich) and, after DNase I treatment, was converted into complementary DNA (cDNA) using hexanucleotide primers and Superscript II reverse transcription (Invitrogen). The rearranged cDNA of TCR-α8.3 and TCR-β4 chains were amplified with the following primer pairs: TCR-α8.3 sense with SalI restriction site, 5′-AGGTGTCGACCTTCCATGAACATGCGTCCTGACACC-3′; TCR-α C terminus with BamHI restriction site, 5′-ATAGGATCCTCAACTGGACCACAGCCTCAGC-3′; TCR-β4 sense with SalI restriction site, 5′-AGGTGTCGACTGACACTGCTATGGGCTCCATTTTCCTC-3′; and TCR-β C2 terminus with BamHI restriction site, 5′-ATAGGATCCGGGTGAAGAACGGCTCAGGATGC-3′ (all synthesized at Metabion). The rearranged TCR-α8.3 and TCR-β4 chains from C3 cDNA were verified by sequencing. To eliminate a XhoI restriction site (CTC GAG) in TCR-β4 at aa 116, GAG was changed into GAA, both coding for glutamate, using a site-directed mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies) with the following primer pair: Vβ4 XhoI–Mut sense, 5′-CCAGACTGACTGTTCTCGAAGATCTGAGAAATGTG-3′; and Vβ4 XhoI–Mut, 5′-CACATTTCTCAGATCTTCGAGAACAGTCAGCTGG-3′. The amino acid sequence of the CDR3 regions is as follows: TCα8.3, LYY CALSGGNNAPR FG (V8.3J4); and TCR-β4, CASS QERT DSAE TLY (V4D1J2.3C2). The complete rearranged TCR chains were cloned into the pHSE3′ vector (35), leading to expression under the control of the transgenic MHC class I H2-Kb promoter. XhoI-linearized TCR-containing plasmids were coinjected into the pronuclei of fertilized FVB oocytes. Transgenic founders were identified by PCR using a specific primer for C3 Vα-Jα or Vβ-Jβ in combination with a pHSE3′-specific primer (TCR-α chain: mTCR-Vα8.3-CDR3 sense, 5′-CTCCATAAGAGCAGCAGCTCC-3′, and hu β-globin antisense, 5′-CGTCTGTTTCCCATTCTAAACTGTACC-3′; TCR-β chain: PH-2Kb sense, 5′-CTGGATATAAAGTCCACGCAGCC-3′, and TCR-Vβ4-CDR3 antisense, 5′-CAATCTCTGCTTTTGATGGCTCAAAC-3′). Transgenic mice were backcrossed for at least eight generations into the SJL/J background.
Mice were injected s.c. at the back with 200 µl of recombinant MOG (200 µg), which was emulsified in Freund's adjuvant and supplemented with 3 mg/ml Mycobacterium tuberculosis (strain H37Ra). 200 ng of pertussis toxin was injected i.p. on days 0 and 2 after immunization. Clinical scoring of classical paralytic EAE was performed as follows: score 0, healthy; 1, flaccid tail; 1.5, flaccid tail and impaired righting reflex; 2, impaired righting reflex and hind limb weakness; 2.5, one hind leg paralyzed; 3, both hind legs paralyzed with residual mobility in both legs; 3.5, both hind legs completely paralyzed; 4, both hind legs completely paralyzed and beginning front limb paralysis; and 5, moribund or death of the animal after preceding clinical disease. Ataxic scoring was as follows: score 0, healthy; 1, mouse partly tilted, feet fall into cage fence; 2, tilted and tumbles; 3, mouse heavily tilted and moves in circles; 4, inability to walk, is only rolling. and 5, moribund. All animal procedures used were in accordance with guidelines of the committee on animals of the Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology and with the license of the Regierung von Oberbayern (Munich, Germany).
Recombinant histidine-tagged rat MOG protein (aa 1–125) was purified from bacterial inclusion bodies (36). MOG peptide 90–110 (SDEGGYTCFFRDHSYQEEAA), MOG 1–26 (GQFRVIGPGYPIRALVGDEAELPCRI), and MOG 92–106 (DEGGYTCFFRDHSYQ) were synthesized at the core facility of the Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry (Martinsried, Germany) or BioTrend (Köln, Germany). All antigens used in the study were of >95% purity, analyzed by silver staining of PAGE (proteins) or HPLC analysis (peptides).
Proliferation assays were performed as previously described (2). Each sample was run in triplicates, the proliferative response of which is represented by the mean ± SEM. All assays were replicated at least three times.
Cytokine measurements and determination of serum titers of MOG-specific antibodies was performed as previously described (2). Antibodies were obtained from BD, except the anti–IL-17 which was obtained from R&D Systems. Each assay was repeated at least three times.
Single cell suspensions were prepared from spleen, lymph node, thymus, or CNS tissue by mechanical disruption via forcing trough 40-µm cell strainers (BD). Erythrocytes of spleen cell suspensions were lysed by hypotonic treatment. CNS infiltrate cells were purified by Percoll gradient centrifugation. Cells were resuspended in Percoll (GE Healthcare) at a density of 1.035 g/ml and centrifuged over Percoll of a 1.08-g/ml density for 30 min at 20°C. The interphase was recovered and subjected to FACS analysis. For detection of cell surface markers by flow cytometric analysis, cells were stained in FACS medium (PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.1% NaN3) with different fluorochrome-labeled MAbs. For cytofluorometry, we used the FACSCalibur system with CellQuest software (BD), and for analysis we used WinMDI 2.9 software (Joe Trotter, The Scripps Institute, La Jolla, CA) was used. For intracellular cytokine staining, cells were first surface stained and then fixed and permeabilized in 4% PFA/0.1% saponin in Hepes-buffered HBSS, stained intracellularly, and washed. Before staining, cells were activated with 50 ng/ml PMA/500 ng/ml ionomycin in the presence of 5 µg/ml brefeldin A for 4 h. The following fluorochrome-labeled antibodies were purchased from BD or eBioscience: CD3 (145-2C11), CD4 (RM4-5), CD8 (53–6.7), Vα8.3 (B21.14), Vβ4 (KT4), CD11b (M1/70), CD45.1 (A20), CD19 (1D3), B220 (RA3-6B2), CD62L (MEL-14), CD25 (PC61), IFN-γ (XMG1.2), IL-17 (TC11-18H10), and IgG1 (A85-1).
Brain and spinal cord tissue from mice fixed by perfusion with 4% phosphate buffered paraformaldehyde were embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections were stained with H&E, with Luxol fast blue for myelin, and by Bielschowsky silver impregnation for visualization of neurons and axons. Adjacent serial sections were stained by immunocytochemistry, using primary antibodies directed against CD3, B220, Mac-3, mouse Ig, and rat/mouse complement C9 neoantigen. Immunocytochemistry was performed with a biotin avidin technique.
Real time quantitative PCR analysis was performed as previously described (2). Quantification of the expression of mouse immune and housekeeping genes was performed by Taqman PCR using the following primer/probe combinations: GAPDH sense, 5′-TCACCACCATGGAGAAGGC-3′; GAPDH antisense, 5′-GCTAAGCAGTTGGTGGTGCA-3′; GAPDH probe, 5′-ATGCCCCCATGTTTGTGATGGGTGT-3′; mIL-5 sense, 5′-CCGCTCACCGAGCTCTGTT-3′; mIL-5 antisense, 5′-AGATTTCTCCAATGCATAGCTGG-3′; IL-5 probe, 5′-CAGGAAGCCTCATCGTCTCATTGCTTGT-3′; mIL-10 sense, 5′-CAGAGAAGCATGGCCCAGAA-3′; mIL-10 antisense, 5′-TGCTCCACTGCCTTGCTCTT-3′; mIL-10 probe, 5′-TGAGGCGCTGTCATCGATTTCTCCC-3′; mIL-17 sense, 5′-AACTCCCTTGGCGCAAAAGT-3′; mIL-17 antisense, 5′-GGCACTGAGCTTCCCAGATC-3′; mIL-17 probe, 5′-CCACGTCACCCTGGACTCTCCACC-3′; mCD4 sense, 5′-CGTTTCCTCTCATCATCAATAAACTTA-3′; mCD4 antisense, 5′-GGCTGGTACCCGGACTGAAG-3′; mCD4 probe, 5′-CACTTTGAACACCCACAACTCCACCTCCT-3′; TCR-Vα8.3 sense, 5′-CCACGCCACTCTCCATAAGAG-3′; TCR-Vα8.3 antisense, 5′-CAGTAGTACAGGCCAGAGTCTGACA-3′; TCR-Vα8.3 probe, 5′-CCTGAGCCAAAATACAGCGTTT-3′; TCR-Vβ sense, 5′-TGATGACTCGGCCACATACTTC-3′; TCR-Vβ4 antisense, 5′-AGCAGCTCCTTCCATCTGCAGAAGTCC-3′; TCR-Vβ4 probe, 5′-TGCCAGCAGCCAAGAACGGACAGAT-3′; mFoxP3 sense, 5′-AGGAGAAGCTGGGAGCTATGC-3′; mFoxP3 antisense, 5′-TGGCTACGATGCAGCAAGAG-3′; and mFoxP3 probe, 5′-AAGGCTCCATCTGTGGCCTCAATGGA-3′. IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-4, IL-13, and IP-10 Taqman probes were synthesized as described in Giulietti et al. (37).
For EL4-MOG cells, the mouse Mog cDNA was cloned into the retroviral vector pLXSN (Clontech Laboratories, Inc.) and transformed into a GP+E-86 packaging cell line. Virus-containing supernatant was used to stably transduce the mouse EL4 lymphoma cell line. EL4 and MOG-transduced EL4 cells (EL4-MOG; 2 × 105/well) were incubated with sera at the indicated dilutions for 30–45 min at 4°C, washed intensively, and thereafter either stained with biotinylated anti–mouse IgG1 (BD) and streptavidin–PE diluted at 1/150 and PI at 1 µg/ml or incubated with LOW-TOX-M rabbit complement (Cedarlane Laboratories) at a 1/10 dilution for 90 min at 37°C and thereafter analyzed for lysis by staining with PI. For analysis of binding only live (PI−) cells are gated for the histograms.
For B cell depletion, 20 µg of mouse anti–mouse CD20 (18B12; IgG2a; Biogen Idec) (38) or IgG2a control antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) was injected s.c. into 3-d-old TCR1640 mice. 2 wk later, pups were injected with 80 µg and, at 4 wk old, with 250 µg of respective antibodies. Injections were repeated thereafter at 2-wk intervals with 250 µg of respective antibodies.
Sera were obtained through retroorbital bleeding from TCR1640 or NTL. WT SJL/J mice were immunized with 100 µg PLP139-151 in 5 mg/ml CFA. 200 ng of Pertussis toxin was injected on days 0 and 2. When mice showed clinical EAE signs (score ~1.0), they received i.p. injections of 250 µl TCR1640 serum or NTL serum or 8.18c5 mAb three times at 48-h intervals.
Differential spontaneous EAE incidence of female to males was analyzed by logrank test (by an in-built survival curve analysis function from Prism 4 [Graph Pad Software, Inc.]), and the effect of serum transfer on EAE development was analyzed by two-way ANOVA. P-values < 0.05 were considered to be significant.
Fig. S1 shows the nature and encephalitogenicity of TCR donor clone C3. Fig. S2 shows the TCR expression in TCR1640 transgenic mice splenocytes. Fig. S3 illustrates the spontaneous disease course of individual transgenic TCR1640 animals. Fig. S4 shows the CNS messenger RNA expression analysis of spontaneous EAE- and MOG-immunized mice. Fig. S5 shows the efficiency of B cell depletion in TCR1640 mice. Video S1 shows one diseased double-transgenic mouse in different EAE stages. Table S1 shows a summary of spontaneous EAE in TCR transgenic SJL/J mice. Table S2 shows a summary of histological analysis of representative individual mice with spontaneous EAE. Table S3 summarizes spontaneous EAE incidence and mortality in TCR1640 mice treated with anti-CD20 and control isotype antibodies. Online supplemental material is available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20090299/DC1.
We are grateful to Irene Arnold-Ammer, Lydia Penner, Iris Jarsch, Michaela Krug, Marianne Leiszer, and Ulrike Köck for excellent technical support.
This project was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 571, Project B6) and the Max Planck society. S.H. Domingues is supported by a PhD fellowship (Portuguese FCT program SFRH/BD/15885/2005).
The authors have no conflicting financial interests.
Abbreviations used: cDNA, complementary DNA; CNS, central nervous system; EAE, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; MOG, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein; MS, multiple sclerosis; NTL, nontransgenic littermate; OSE, opticospinal EAE; OSMS, opticospinal MS; PI, propidium iodide; rMOG, recombinant rat MOG; RR, relapsing-remitting.