PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of hhmipaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHMI Howard Hughes Medical Institute; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal
 
J Exp Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jul 22, 2009.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2714167
HHMIMSID: HHMIMS116742
A glucagon-like endocrine pathway in Drosophila modulates both lipid and carbohydrate homeostasis
K. N. Bharucha,1* P. Tarr,2 and S. L. Zipursky2
1Department of Pediatrics and Pharmacology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas 75390, USA
2Department of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: kamal.bharucha/at/utsouthwestern.edu)
The regulation of energy homeostasis is fundamental to all organisms. The Drosophila fat body serves as a repository for both triglycerides and glycogen, combining the energy storage functions of mammalian adipose and hepatic tissues, respectively. Here we show that mutation of the Drosophila adipokinetic hormone receptor (AKHR), a functional analog of the mammalian glucagon receptor, leads to abnormal accumulation of both lipid and carbohydrate. As a consequence of their obese phenotypes, AKHR mutants are markedly starvation resistant. We show that AKHR is expressed in the fat body, and, intriguingly, in a subset of gustatory neurons that mediate sweet taste. Genetic rescue experiments establish that the metabolic phenotypes arise exclusively from the fat body AKHR expression. Behavioral experiments demonstrate that AKHR mutants are neither sedentary nor hyperphagic, suggesting the metabolic abnormalities derive from a genetic propensity to retain energy stores. Taken together, our results indicate that a single endocrine pathway contributes to both lipid and carbohydrate catabolism in the Drosophila fat body.
Keywords: AKHR, fat body, obesity
The study of Drosophila metabolism is an emerging field that can contribute greatly to the understanding of conserved mechanisms that regulate carbohydrate and lipid homeostasis. Indeed, recent reviews highlight the remarkable parallels between metabolic pathways in Drosophila and mammals (Baker and Thummel, 2007; Leopold and Perrimon, 2007). Furthermore, the powerful genetic tools available in Drosophila research make the fly a particularly tractable model organism in which to probe metabolic pathways regulating energy balance. For example, the Drosophila fat body, the major depot for carbohydrate and lipid stores, is amenable to genetic manipulation specifically in either larval or adult stages (e.g. see Lazareva et al., 2007). Thus, it is becoming increasingly apparent that the powerful tools of Drosophila genetics can be a gateway for a better understanding of human metabolic disorders.
The molecular mechanisms by which humans and flies regulate the storage and release of fuel molecules display remarkable parallels. For example, Drosophila insulin-like peptides (dILPs) have a profound effect on growth and energy homeostasis, recapitulating the role of the mammalian insulin pathway (Rulifson et al., 2002). dILPs bind to a single receptor (InR) and signal through downstream effectors that are homologous to mammalian counterparts (Garofalo, 2002; Geminard et al., 2006; Goberdhan and Wilson, 2003; Lasko, 2002; Wu and Brown, 2006). The adipokinetic hormone (AKH) family of peptides is thought to play a key role in catabolism in a variety of insect species (Van der Horst, 2003). In Drosophila, AKH is secreted by a small group of specialized neuroendocrine cells, ablation of which results in a profound decrease in circulating carbohydrate levels (Isabel et al., 2005; Kim and Rulifson, 2004; Lee and Park, 2004). The AKH pathway has been proposed to be the functional analog of the mammalian glucagon receptor. Strikingly, the molecular mechanisms by which AKH- and dILP-secreting cells regulate carbohydrate homeostasis are similar to those employed by insulin- and glucagon-secreting pancreatic islet cells.
The fat body is the primary energy storage tissue in Drosophila (Canavoso et al., 2001). Glycogen and triglyceride comprise the major forms of energy storage for carbohydrate and lipids, respectively. In insects, enzymatic pathways that mediate both the synthesis and breakdown of glycogen have clear homology to those found in mammals (Orgad et al., 1987). Thus, the study of fly mutants with alterations in lipid accumulation in the fat body raises the intriguing possibility that they will provide insight into genetic determinants of human obesity and energy homeostasis (Kulkarni and Perrimon, 2005; Murphy and Bloom, 2006). In mammals, the energy storage function of the fat body is performed in separate tissues (such as liver and adipose). Because the fat body plays a major role in both carbohydrate and lipid storage, research in Drosophila could also illuminate the interplay between these two major arms of metabolism within a single tissue.
Although several mutants of the Drosophila insulin pathway have been studied, no mutants in the AKH pathway existed upon initiation of the current work. Genetic manipulation of the AKH pathway had been limited to cell ablation studies of AKH-producing corpora cardiaca cells (Isabel et al., 2005; Kim and Rulifson, 2004; Lee and Park, 2004) and ectopic expression of AKH in the fat body (Lee and Park, 2004). Biochemical studies have shown that AKH binds with high affinity to its G-protein-coupled receptor (AKHR) (Park et al., 2002; Staubli et al., 2002). Furthermore, activation of AKHR activates many of the same second messenger pathways as the mammalian glucagon receptor (such as production of cAMP) (Gade and Auerswald, 2003; Unson, 2002). We envisioned that further analysis of the glucagon-like AKH pathway in Drosophila could yield general insights into the regulation of energy homeostasis by endocrine systems. To this end, we generated mutations in Akhr and assessed their effects on metabolism, starvation resistance, locomotor activity and feeding behavior. While this work was being prepared for publication, an independent study of Akhr was published (Gronke et al., 2007).
Fly stocks
Akhr-Gal4 transgenic Drosophila melanogaster Meigen were generated using standard P-element-mediated germline transformation with a 2.8 kb DNA fragment (bounded by the adjacent CG11188 gene and the Akhr transcription start site; forward primer: gaccgcttacgcaaagtttg and reverse primer: gtatctgaatgcaactgcatc) cloned into pCasper4-AUG-Gal4. Akhr–red fluorescent protein (RFP) transgenic flies were prepared by cloning the aforementioned promoter fragment into a previously reported RFP-containing plasmid (Jones et al., 2007). Akhr cDNA (isoform PA as annotated in FlyBase) was obtained using EST GH19447 (Bloomington) as a PCR template (forward primer: cttgtcccaaaaaatggc and reverse primer: ttacttctggcggatcgg). The resulting Akhr cDNA fragment was cloned into pUAST to generate the UAS-Akhr plasmid that was used to generate transgenic flies. A P-element excision screen was performed starting from Akhrp (y1w67c23;P{EPgy2}GRHREY11371; Bloomington stock no. 20304) and a transposase containing stock (y1w*; CyO, H{w[+mC]=PDelta2-3}HoP2.1/Bc1; Bloomington stock no. 2078). Akhrrev and Akhrnull flies were isolated by initially screening for white-eyed flies and then further characterized by PCR using primers flanking the P-element insertion and ATG transcription start sites. The Akhrrev flies contain only a 17bp remnant (catgttatttcatcatg) at the original P-element (EY11371) insertion site and an otherwise wild-type gene scaffold. The Akhrnull flies contain an ~450bp remnant of the excised P element fused to genomic sequence 144bp downstream of the original Akhr gene locus, with removal of all intervening coding Akhr sequence, including the transcription start site. The P-element remnant in Akhrnull flies is fused to the genomic region downstream of Akhr commencing with the following sequence: tttgaattgatatgcg. The coding sequences of the flanking genes (Tsp and CG1118) were intact. The flies were raised on standard medium (yeast–agar–molasses) with 12h:12h light:dark cycle at 25°C. The fat body r4-Gal4 line (Lee and Park, 2004) was obtained from J. Park (University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA) and gustatory neuron-Gal4 lines (Wang et al., 2004) were obtained from K. Scott (University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA).
Genetic rescue experiments
Flies containing a UAS-Akhr insert on the third chromosome were made homozygous null for Akhr, which is on the second chromosome. Similarly, third chromosome inserts of fat body-Gal4 or neuronal-Gal4 stocks were established in an Akhrnull background. The Gal4 transgenic stocks used in these experiments are described in this paper (i.e. Akhr-Gal4) and have been previously published (see references above); we independently confirmed the expression pattern for all published stocks. Rescue stocks were derived by crossing the just described UAS-Akhr and tissue-specific Gal4 stocks, allowing selective re-introduction of Akhr (in an otherwise null background).
RT-PCR
Total RNA of a given genotype was isolated from 50 frozen flies (1-week-old males) according to a modified solid-phase Qiagen (Valencia, CA, USA) RNeasy Mini Kit (cat. no. 74104) protocol (DGRC, CGB Technical Report 2006-10). Fat body-derived RNA was isolated using the preceding reagents from tissue pooled from approximately 20 wandering third instar larvae dissected in cold PBS. A 5g aliquot of total RNA was subsequently treated with DNAse I and cDNA was prepared using Superscript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). PCR was performed with primers to exon 5 (forward: ggactctacaacattcgc) and exon 6 (reverse: cctcttccattcagcagc) of the Akhr gene.
Immunostaining
Fly brains were dissected and stained using previously described procedures (Nern et al., 2005); images were captured using a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope. Mouse polyclonal AKHR antibodies were generated by the ASU CIM Antibody Core (Tempe, AZ, USA).
Nile Red staining
Fat body cells were visualized using Nile Red staining, according to a published protocol (Gronke et al., 2005).
Starvation and locomotor assay
Male flies were individually placed in Drosophila Activity Monitoring System (DAMS; Trikinetics, Waltham, MA, USA) testing chambers (previously capped with 2% agarose at one end). The flies were grown on a 12h:12h light:dark cycle at 25°C; locomotor data were collected in the dark, also at 25°C. Data were exported into Excel and average total locomotor activity (as measured by the total number of recorded midline crossings) and starvation resistance were calculated for each line (N=16 per genotype). Starvation resistance was defined as the time of death after initiation of food deprivation, estimated as the time of last recorded midline crossing for a given fly.
Body size measurements
Digital images of adult wings were obtained at constant magnification. Using the ‘magic lasso’ tool in PhotoShop, the area (pixel count) of each wing that was bounded by L4, L5, the anterior cross vein and the lateral wing border was measured. Higher magnification images were obtained for wing cell size measurements. A constant square area of each wing was highlighted in PhotoShop and the hairs were counted as a surrogate measure of the number of cells in that area. Mesothorax (French et al., 1998) and foreleg femur lengths were measured in arbitrary units, but the relative lengths of these measurements were preserved in the normalization.
Triglyceride and glycogen measurements
For triglyceride measurements, 1-week-old male flies (N=10 for each genotype) were homogenized for lipid extraction in 3 ml 2:1 chloroform:methanol. Total triglyceride content was determined using the Waco L-Type TG kit (Richmond, VA, USA). For glycogen measurements, 1-week-old male flies (N=40 in fed state; N=100 in starved state) were homogenized in 2 ml buffer (0.01 moll−1 KH2PO4, 1 mmoll−1 EDTA, pH 7.4). The homogenate was spun for 15 min at 13,000 g to remove fly debris. The supernatant was aliquoted and stored at −80°C. The Sigma Starch Assay Kit (SA-20; St Louis, MO, USA) employs a two-step enzymatic approach for glycogen determination. In this assay, glycogen is first hydrolyzed by incubation with amyloglucosidase; the resulting glucose monomers are treated with hexokinase and the resulting NADPH generated is quantified spectrophotometrically against a glucose standard curve.
Food intake assay
Batches of 1-week-old male flies (40–60 per run) were placed in Terizaki plates (ISC Bioexpress, Kaysville, UT, USA; Cat. No. T-3017-2) in which wells were filled with 10 mmol l−1 sucrose in 1% agar, containing 0.5% (w/v) dye (FD&C No. 1; Spectrum Chemicals, Gardena, CA, USA). The food intake of Akhrnull and Akhrrev flies was calculated by quantifying the absorbance of ingested dye according to a published protocol (Libert et al., 2007). Fed flies were exposed to the dye for approximately 6 h and the previously starved flies for approximately 30 min. The longer time for fed flies was needed to obtain adequate signal; previously starved flies required only 30 min exposure to ingest a measurable quantity of dye-containing food.
Generation of Akhr mutants
To assess the contribution of the AKH pathway to energy homeostasis, we generated loss-of-function mutations in Akhr. A P-element insertion (Akhrp) into the non-coding exon 1 of the Akhr gene was found in an available collection. A null mutation (Akhrnull) and a wild-type revertant (Akhrrev) were isolated by excision of the P element through hybrid dysgenesis (Fig. 1A) (Ryder and Russell, 2003). Akhrnull removes the entire coding sequence with minimal disruption of adjacent genes. Only ~150bp of genomic sequence downstream of Akhr is removed in Akhrnull mutants, allowing phenotypes to be ascribed to the specific removal of the Akhr gene. The revertant retains a small remnant (<20 bp) of the ~10kb P element, but otherwise restores wild-type gene structure (see Materials and methods section for a full description). RT-PCR analysis of whole body homogenates demonstrated Akhr mRNA transcript production in Akhrrev flies but not in Akhrnull flies (data not shown). The Akhrnull mutant is homozygous viable, allowing detailed phenotypic analysis in the adult.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Generation of Akhr mutants. (A) Schematic representation of Akhr alleles. Akhrp (EY11371) contains a P element inserted in exon 1, upstream of the start of translation. Akhrrev is a P-element excision allele; an ~20bp remnant of the P element remains. (more ...)
AKHR is expressed in the Drosophila fat body
To probe the expression pattern of AKHR, we generated transgenic flies that expressed the transcriptional activator Gal4 under the control of a region of DNA upstream of the Akhr gene likely to contain all the transcriptional elements needed to recapitulate the expression pattern of AKHR. Three independent lines were generated and were crossed to flies carrying a reporter gene with the Gal4 binding sites (i.e. UAS) fused to GFP. Robust expression of GFP was observed in the adult Drosophila fat body (Fig.1C–E), the primary tissue for the storage of fuel molecules. Strong expression is observed in the body cavity as well as the pericerebral region in all three transgenic lines. Expression in the larval fat body was also observed (data not shown). RT-PCR using RNA isolated from dissected fat body tissue confirmed fat body expression. In addition, detection of Akhr fat body expression by in situ hybridization has been reported in independent work (Gronke et al., 2007). The expression of AKHR in the fat body (as reflected by GFP reporter fluorescence) is consistent with its expected role in regulating energy homeostasis.
Akhr mutants have larger lipid and carbohydrate stores
We found that 1-week-old male Akhrnull mutants had at least a twofold increase in triglyceride content when compared with Akhrrev flies (Fig. 2A); Akhrp flies had intermediate triglyceride levels under normal feeding conditions (data not shown). Furthermore, Nile Red staining of dissected fat body tissue (Gronke et al., 2005) demonstrated markedly larger cells in Akhrnull flies than in control Akhrrev flies (Fig. 2B), consistent with the total body lipid measurements. Akhrnull mutants showed a modest increase in glycogen content compared to Akhrrev control flies, but the difference became more apparent after 24 h of starvation (Fig. 2C). Genetic rescue experiments provide further confirmation of the carbohydrate phenotype. Akhrnull mutants containing either the akhr-Gal4 or UAS-Akhr transgene had higher glycogen content than rescue flies with both transgenes (both in the fed and starved states; Fig. 2D).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Akhr mutants have abnormal lipid and carbohydrate homeostasis. All experiments were performed with 1-week-old male flies unless otherwise noted. In the bar graphs data for Akhrnull flies are shown in blue and those for Akhrrev flies in yellow. (A) Akhr (more ...)
Akhr mutants do not display any growth phenotypes, in contrast to mutants in the Drosophila insulin signaling cascade (which have decreased body and cell size; Fig. 2E) (Wu and Brown, 2006). Quantification of food intake in the fed state did not reveal any gross differences in ingestion between Akhrnull and Akhrrev flies (Fig. 2F). In fact, Akhrnull flies consumed less of a dye-containing sucrose meal after 18–24 h of starvation. Thus, the higher total body triglyceride content of Akhrnull flies indicates an ‘obese’ phenotype rather than arising from an increase in overall body size. In humans, the term obesity is used as a measurement of mass corrected for size. Because Akhrnull flies do not have any growth phenotypes, we describe their higher total triglyceride content as reflecting an obese phenotype rather than merely arising from an increase in total body size. Intriguingly, based on our feeding experiments, the etiology of the obese phenotypes is unlikely to arise from hyperphagic behavior of fed Akhrnull mutants.
Akhr mutants are starvation resistant
Previous work in Drosophila has shown that starvation resistance correlates strongly with lipid content (Djawdan et al., 1998). We therefore asked whether the higher triglyceride content of Akhrnull flies confers a survival benefit during starvation. A priori, if the AKH axis were the only pathway mediating lipolysis, one would expect that mutant flies would not be starvation resistant. However, we found Akhrnull flies were markedly starvation resistant when compared with control flies (Fig. 3A,B). Akhrnull flies survived for about 3–4 days under starvation conditions, whereas control flies lived for 1–2 days. Young Akhrrev flies were more starvation resistant than older flies, but young Akhrnull flies were as starvation resistant as their older counterparts (Fig. 3B). It has been shown that larval fat body cells can persist in the newly emerged adult (Aguila et al., 2007). We have observed that the older mutant and revertant flies lack the characteristically dissociable residual larval fat body cells of younger flies. Taken together, these results suggest that Akhrnull flies have a higher triglyceride content (and are thus more starvation resistant) than Akhrrev flies because of continued accumulation of lipid stores during the initial days of adulthood.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Akhr mutants are starvation resistant. All experiments were performed on 1-week-old male flies, except when specifically noted otherwise. Throughout the figure, data for Akhrnull flies and Akhrrev flies are represented in blue and yellow, respectively. (more ...)
We observed that after 48 h of starvation, nearly all revertant flies do not survive, in contrast to null mutant flies (see Fig. 3A for a quantification of starvation resistance profiles). In addition, we found that Akhrnull flies were fertile even after 48 h of starvation (data not shown), a time point at which nearly all wild-type flies are dead. Thus, the starvation resistant Akhrnull mutant flies can be maintained and propagated, despite being subjected to a potentially lethal environmental stressor. Akhrnull flies retain the ability to mobilize triglyceride but have significant stores even after 72 h of starvation, around the average time of death (Fig. 3C).
Decreased locomotor activity does not contribute to the starvation resistance of Akhr mutants
AKH is thought to play a role in modulating locomotor activity, as ablation of AKH cells decreased locomotor activity under starvation conditions (Isabel et al., 2005; Lee and Park, 2004). The starvation resistance of Akhr mutant flies could thus also reflect a decrease in energy expenditure resulting from reduced locomotion. To ascertain whether the starvation resistance of Akhrnull flies was affected by decreased energy expenditure in locomotion, we monitored the activity of individual revertant and mutant flies. One-week-old male Akhrnull mutants in the fed state had no obvious defects in locomotor behavior or circadian rhythm (Fig. 3D). Importantly, no statistically significant differences were seen between Akhrnull and Akhrrev flies during the first 24h of starvation (Fig. 3E), a time point at which the vast majority of Akhrrev flies were still alive. As previous studies, in which AKH-secreting cells were ablated, suggested a role for AKH in regulating locomotion under starvation conditions, we were surprised that loss of AKHR did not affect locomotion. Although the underlying reason for this discrepancy is not known, locomotor activity may be regulated by other hormones released from AKH-secreting endocrine cells or another AKH receptor. In summary, these data indicate that there is no contribution of abnormal locomotor activity to the starvation resistant phenotypes of AKHR mutant flies.
AKHR is expressed in attractive gustatory neurons
We asked whether AKHR is expressed in the nervous system, as many peptides hormones (and their receptors) have been shown to be critical for regulating energy homeostasis and food intake in both insects and mammals (Schwartz and Porte, 2005; Wu et al., 2005). We observed an intriguing expression pattern of AKHR in a subset of neurons in the adult subesophageal ganglion (Fig. 4A–F), a site of projection for the majority of peripheral gustatory neurons in Drosophila (Amrein and Thorne, 2005; Scott, 2005). A similar expression pattern was observed in three independent transgenic lines. However, verification of gustatory neuronal expression by in situ hybridization was unsuccessful, as is the case for the majority of published gustatory neuron-Gal4 transgenic lines. Unfortunately, antibody staining also failed to give independent evidence for gustatory neuron expression. As additional evidence for Akhr expression in the gustatory system, Akhr was independently identified in a genome-wide microarray screen for genes specifically expressed in the Drosophila gustatory system; the Akhr gene mRNA transcript was found to be significantly downregulated (by 2.942-fold; Student’s t-test, P value <0.01) in poxn mutants (which lack gustatory neurons) when compared to heterozygous controls (P. Cameron and K. Scott, personal communication).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Fat body (but not neuronal) AKHR expression substantiates observed metabolic phenotypes. (A–C) The axon projection pattern of akhr-Gal4-expressing gustatory neurons in the adult subesophageal ganglion. The dark region at the top of the picture (more ...)
Recent work has demonstrated that Drosophila gustatory neurons are functionally segregated into neurons that mediate attractive taste and aversive taste modalities. Interestingly, immunohistochemical double labeling with markers for different subclasses of gustatory neurons indicated that AKHR is expressed in neurons associated with attractive taste (e.g. Gr5a-expressing neurons; Fig. 4A–C), but strictly excluded from neurons mediating aversive taste (e.g. Gr66a-expressing neurons; Fig. 4D–F). We postulate that additional AKHR-expressing neurons probably represent other gustatory neurons mediating attractive taste. Taken together, the labeling studies indicate that AKHR is expressed in a highly selective fashion in only a subset of gustatory neurons, strictly excluded from all neurons known to be associated with aversive taste. Given the co-expression in a major subset of attractive-gustatory neurons, an intriguing possibility is that AKHR may be expressed in all neurons mediating attractive taste.
Fat body AKHR expression mediates metabolic phenotypes
To determine whether AKHR expression is required in the fat body or the nervous system to mediate starvation resistance, we performed genetic rescue experiments. In these experiments, Akhr expression was induced in either the fat body or Gr5a gustatory neurons, in an otherwise Akhr homozygous null mutant background (see the Materials and methods section for a more detailed description). A dramatic decrease in starvation resistance in Akhrnull mutants was observed after expressing AKHR under the control of a fat body-Gal4 driver (r4-Gal4; Fig. 4G) (Lee, 2004). Similar rescue experiments using Gr5a-Gal4, which drives Gal4 expression in a majority of attractive-gustatory neurons, did not revert starvation resistance (Wang, 2004). Fat body AKHR expression also greatly reduced triglyceride content (Fig. 4H). Our data suggest that the regulation of total body triglyceride content is probably independent of gustatory AKHR expression. In summary, genetic rescue experiments demonstrate that manipulation of expression of AKHR in the fat body is sufficient to modulate triglyceride content and starvation resistance.
AKHR and the hungry fly
The Drosophila fat body serves as a major depot for storage of carbohydrates and lipids. We have shown that the AKH pathways serves as a critical determinant of both glycogen and triglyceride homeostasis. Interestingly, Akhr mutants are starvation resistant, retaining the ability to mobilize their lipids stores. Thus, it appears that the AKH pathways acts as a generalized catabolic signal, mobilizing both lipid and carbohydrate energy stores. Interestingly, our work suggests that the obese phenotypes of Akhr mutants do not result from increased food intake. In fact, Akhr mutants appear to ingest less when previously challenged with starvation. We therefore propose that the obese phenotypes result from a genetic propensity to retain energy stores rather than by increased food ingestion. Akhr mutants do not have any gross defects in locomotor activity (as measured by DAMS), suggesting that the greater energy reserves of mutant flies do not result from decreased energy expenditure in locomotor behavior.
Other lipolytic mechanisms (independent of the AKH pathway) must exist in Drosophila that enable Akhr mutants to utilize their triglyceride stores and affect their starvation resistance. Recently, the AKH and brummer lipase pathways were shown to be two major pathways regulating lipolysis in Drosophila (Gronke et al., 2007), but they concluded that AKHR does not affect carbohydrate homeostasis. Here, in striking contrast, we demonstrate that AKHR affects both total body carbohydrate and lipid content. In the fed state, the percentage differences in glycogen content between Akhrnull and Akhrrev flies were not as pronounced as the differences in lipid content, perhaps accounting for this discrepancy. However, we show that differences in glycogen content between Akhrnull and Akhrrev flies are more readily apparent after 24h of starvation. Our genetic rescue experiments provide further support for the effect of Akhr expression on carbohydrate homeostasis. Because Akhr mutants (and brummer mutants) retain their ability to access their glycogen stores, we predict that additional pathways exist that regulate carbohydrate homeostasis.
The selective expression of Akhr in gustatory neurons that mediate attractive taste raises the interesting possibility that the AKH pathway coordinates a fly’s response to hunger in two ways: (1) by mobilizing internal energy stores by its action on the fat body, and (2) increasing food intake by its action on attractive-gustatory neurons. Starved Akhr mutants display decreased food intake when re-introduced to food. However, genetic rescue experiments (using flies of the same genotype as those used for rescue of metabolic phenotypes) did not allow us to definitively attribute this altered behavior to loss of AKHR function. Therefore, we cannot rigorously exclude the possibility that the observed feeding behavior results from a background effect. Nonetheless, it is intriguing to speculate that activation of AKHR in the gustatory system promotes food intake in the hungry fly. Further work will be needed to delineate the role of gustatory Akhr expression in the context of an emerging picture of the Drosophila neuronal feeding circuit (Melcher and Pankratz, 2005).
Modulation of energy homeostasis by the AKH pathway
Genes that modulate the retention of fuel molecules can provide an adaptive survival benefit during periods of decreased food availability (Neel, 1962; Speakman, 2004). Our results are consistent with the idea that specific genetic mutations in Drosophila can serve to prolong long-term survival when flies are challenged with food deprivation. There is evidence that selective pressures can be used to increase the triglyceride content of flies both in nature and in the laboratory. For example, naturally occurring mutants of the adipose gene have higher triglyceride stores and are starvation resistant (Hader et al., 2003). In addition, flies with higher triglyceride stores can be generated by selecting for starvation-resistant phenotypes over several generations (Baldal et al., 2006; Djawdan et al., 1998; Hoffmann and Harshman, 1999). Overall, more work is needed to understand better how specific genetic mechanisms contribute to the adaptation of Drosophila to specific ecological niches differing in food availability (Hoffmann and Weeks, 2007; Montooth et al., 2003; Reaume and Sokolowski, 2006).
Over the approximately 600 million years of evolution that separate humans from flies from common urbilaterial ancestors (De Robertis and Sasai, 1996), mammals have evolved discrete liver and adipose tissues that have energy storage functions performed jointly by the Drosophila fat body. Thus, AKHR expression in the fat body is uniquely poised to control mobilization of both carbohydrates and lipids. Mammals may require a more elaborate array of endocrine signals that coordinate carbohydrate and lipid homeostasis during periods of food deprivation. For example, specific genetic manipulation of the mammalian glucagon pathway is rendered difficult by the complex structure of the preproglucagon gene (Drucker, 2001). Although murine glucagon receptor knockouts have abnormal carbohydrate metabolism, no obese phenotypes have been observed (Conarello et al., 2007; Gelling et al., 2003; Parker et al., 2002). Significantly, these results are confounded by upregulation of other hormone pathways. Thus, Drosophila offers a genetically tractable model organism to dissect pathways involved with energy mobilization.
We anticipate that further study of the AKHR pathway will provide a better understanding of the downstream signaling components regulating glycogenolysis and lipolysis that are conserved between flies and mammals. In addition, the power of forward genetic screens in the Drosophila may uncover other determinants of energy homeostasis that have relevance to the study of human disorders of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, such as obesity and diabetes (Gronke et al., 2005; Ruden et al., 2005).
Acknowledgments
K.N.B. would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Pediatric Scientist Development Program (K12-HD00850) and the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine. P.T. would like to acknowledge the financial support of a NIH Pre-Doctoral Fellowship (NHLBI T32 69766). We would like to thank Vidya Rai for her assistance with fat body RNA isolation. We would like to thank J. Park (University of Tennessee) and K. Scott (University of California, Berkeley) for graciously providing fly stocks. We would like to thank K. Scott additionally for sharing her expertise in the Drosophila gustatory system and sharing unpublished results. We would like to thank the Zipursky laboratory and Peter Edwards (University of California, Los Angeles) for their critical review of the manuscript. We thank M. Wu and X. Zhan for their assistance with the locomotor activity experiments, and N. Agarwal for her assistance with the feeding experiments. S.L.Z. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
  • Aguila JR, Suszko J, Gibbs AG, Hoshizaki DK. The role of larval fat cells in adult Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 2007;210:956–963. [PubMed]
  • Amrein H, Thorne N. Gustatory perception and behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 2005;15:R673–R684. [PubMed]
  • Baker KD, Thummel CS. Diabetic larvae and obese flies-emerging studies of metabolism in Drosophila. Cell Metab. 2007;6:257–266. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Baldal EA, Brakefield PM, Zwaan BJ. Multitrait evolution in lines of Drosophila melanogaster selected for increased starvation resistance: the role of metabolic rate and implications for the evolution of longevity. Evol. Int. J. Org. Evol. 2006;60:1435–1444. [PubMed]
  • Canavoso LE, Jouni ZE, Karnas KJ, Pennington JE, Wells MA. Fat metabolism in insects. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2001;21:23–46. [PubMed]
  • Conarello SL, Jiang G, Mu J, Li Z, Woods J, Zycband E, Ronan J, Liu F, Roy RS, Zhu L, et al. Glucagon receptor knockout mice are resistant to diet-induced obesity and streptozotocin-mediated beta cell loss and hyperglycaemia. Diabetologia. 2007;50:142–150. [PubMed]
  • De Robertis EM, Sasai Y. A common plan for dorsoventral patterning in Bilateria. Nature. 1996;380:37–40. [PubMed]
  • Djawdan M, Chippindale AK, Rose MR, Bradley TJ. Metabolic reserves and evolved stress resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Physiol. Zool. 1998;71:584–594. [PubMed]
  • Drucker DJ. Minireview: the glucagon-like peptides. Endocrinology. 2001;142:521–527. [PubMed]
  • French V, Feast M, Partridge L. Body size and cell size in Drosophila: the developmental response to temperature. J. Insect Physiol. 1998;44:1081–1089. [PubMed]
  • Gade G, Auerswald L. Mode of action of neuropeptides from the adipokinetic hormone family. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2003;132:10–20. [PubMed]
  • Garofalo RS. Genetic analysis of insulin signaling in Drosophila. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2002;13:156–162. [PubMed]
  • Gelling RW, Du XQ, Dichmann DS, Romer J, Huang H, Cui L, Obici S, Tang B, Holst JJ, Fledelius C, et al. Lower blood glucose, hyperglucagonemia, and pancreatic alpha cell hyperplasia in glucagon receptor knockout mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:1438–1443. [PubMed]
  • Geminard C, Arquier N, Layalle S, Bourouis M, Slaidina M, Delanoue R, Bjordal M, Ohanna M, Ma M, Colombani J, et al. Control of metabolism and growth through insulin-like peptides in Drosophila. Diabetes. 2006;55 Suppl. 2:S5–S8.
  • Goberdhan DC, Wilson C. The functions of insulin signaling: size isn’t everything, even in Drosophila. Differentiation. 2003;71:375–397. [PubMed]
  • Gronke S, Mildner A, Fellert S, Tennagels N, Petry S, Muller G, Jackle H, Kuhnlein RP. Brummer lipase is an evolutionary conserved fat storage regulator in Drosophila. Cell Metab. 2005;1:323–330. [PubMed]
  • Gronke S, Muller G, Hirsch J, Fellert S, Andreou A, Haase T, Jackle H, Kuhnlein RP. Dual lipolytic control of body fat storage and mobilization in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:e137. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hader T, Muller S, Aguilera M, Eulenberg KG, Steuernagel A, Ciossek T, Kuhnlein RP, Lemaire L, Fritsch R, Dohrmann C, et al. Control of triglyceride storage by a WD40/TPR-domain protein. EMBO Rep. 2003;4:511–516. [PubMed]
  • Hoffmann AA, Harshman LG. Desiccation and starvation resistance in Drosophila: patterns of variation at the species, population and intrapopulation levels. Heredity. 1999;83:637–643. [PubMed]
  • Hoffmann AA, Weeks AR. Climatic selection on genes and traits after a 100 year-old invasion: a critical look at the temperate-tropical clines in Drosophila melanogaster from eastern Australia. Genetica. 2007;129:133–147. [PubMed]
  • Isabel G, Martin JR, Chidami S, Veenstra JA, Rosay P. AKH-producing neuroendocrine cell ablation decreases trehalose and induces behavioral changes in Drosophila. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2005;288:R531–R538. [PubMed]
  • Jones WD, Cayirlioglu P, Kadow IG, Vosshall LB. Two chemosensory receptors together mediate carbon dioxide detection in Drosophila. Nature. 2007;445:86–90. [PubMed]
  • Kim SK, Rulifson EJ. Conserved mechanisms of glucose sensing and regulation by Drosophila corpora cardiaca cells. Nature. 2004;431:316–320. [PubMed]
  • Kulkarni MM, Perrimon N. Super-size flies. Cell Metab. 2005;1:288–290. [PubMed]
  • Lasko P. Diabetic flies? Using Drosophila melanogaster to understand the causes of monogenic and genetically complex diseases. Clin. Genet. 2002;62:358–367. [PubMed]
  • Lazareva AA, Roman G, Mattox W, Hardin PE, Dauwalder B. A role for the adult fat body in Drosophila male courtship behavior. PLoS Genet. 2007;3:e16. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lee G, Park JH. Hemolymph sugar homeostasis and starvation-induced hyperactivity affected by genetic manipulations of the adipokinetic hormone-encoding gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2004;167:311–323. [PubMed]
  • Leopold P, Perrimon N. Drosophila and the genetics of the internal milieu. Nature. 2007;450:186–188. [PubMed]
  • Libert S, Chao Y, Chu X, Pletcher SD. Trade-offs between longevity and pathogen resistance in Drosophila melanogaster are mediated by NFkappaB signaling. Aging Cell. 2006;5:533–543. [PubMed]
  • Libert S, Zwiener J, Chu X, Vanvoorhies W, Roman G, Pletcher SD. Regulation of Drosophila life span by olfaction and food-derived odors. Science. 2007;315:1133–1137. [PubMed]
  • Melcher C, Pankratz MJ. Candidate gustatory interneurons modulating feeding behavior in the Drosophila brain. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e305. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Montooth KL, Marden JH, Clark AG. Mapping determinants of variation in energy metabolism, respiration and flight in Drosophila. Genetics. 2003;165:623–635. [PubMed]
  • Murphy KG, Bloom SR. Gut hormones and the regulation of energy homeostasis. Nature. 2006;444:854–859. [PubMed]
  • Neel JV. Diabetes mellitus: a “thrifty” genotype rendered detrimental by “progress”? Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1962;14:353–362. [PubMed]
  • Nern A, Nguyen LV, Herman T, Prakash S, Clandinin TR, Zipursky SL. An isoform-specific allele of Drosophila N-cadherin disrupts a late step of R7 targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:12944–12949. [PubMed]
  • Orgad S, Dudai Y, Cohen P. The protein phosphatases of Drosophila melanogaster and their inhibitors. Eur. J. Biochem. 1987;164:31–38. [PubMed]
  • Park Y, Kim YJ, Adams ME. Identification of G protein-coupled receptors for Drosophila PRXamide peptides, CCAP, corazonin, and AKH supports a theory of ligand-receptor coevolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:11423–11428. [PubMed]
  • Parker JC, Andrews KM, Allen MR, Stock JL, McNeish JD. Glycemic control in mice with targeted disruption of the glucagon receptor gene. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002;290:839–843. [PubMed]
  • Reaume CJ, Sokolowski MB. The nature of Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 2006;16:R623–R628. [PubMed]
  • Ruden DM, De Luca M, Garfinkel MD, Bynum KL, Lu X. Drosophila nutrigenomics can provide clues to human gene-nutrient interactions. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2005;25:499–522. [PubMed]
  • Rulifson EJ, Kim SK, Nusse R. Ablation of insulin-producing neurons in flies: growth and diabetic phenotypes. Science. 2002;296:1118–1120. [PubMed]
  • Ryder E, Russell S. Transposable elements as tools for genomics and genetics in Drosophila. Brief. Funct. Genomic. Proteomic. 2003;2:57–71. [PubMed]
  • Schwartz MW, Porte D., Jr Diabetes, obesity, and the brain. Science. 2005;307:375–379. [PubMed]
  • Scott K. Taste recognition: food for thought. Neuron. 2005;48:455–464. [PubMed]
  • Speakman JR. Obesity: the integrated roles of environment and genetics. J. Nutr. 2004;134:2090S–2105S. [PubMed]
  • Staubli F, Jorgensen TJ, Cazzamali G, Williamson M, Lenz C, Sondergaard L, Roepstorff P, Grimmelikhuijzen CJ. Molecular identification of the insect adipokinetic hormone receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:3446–3451. [PubMed]
  • Unson CG. Molecular determinants of glucagon receptor signaling. Biopolymers. 2002;66:218–235. [PubMed]
  • Van der Horst DJ. Insect adipokinetic hormones: release and integration of flight energy metabolism. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B, Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2003;136:217–226. [PubMed]
  • Wang Z, Singhvi A, Kong P, Scott K. Taste representations in the Drosophila brain. Cell. 2004;117:981–991. [PubMed]
  • Wu Q, Brown MR. Signaling and function of insulin-like peptides in insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2006;51:1–24. [PubMed]
  • Wu Q, Zhao Z, Shen P. Regulation of aversion to noxious food by Drosophila neuropeptide Y- and insulin-like systems. Nat. Neurosci. 2005;8:1350–1355. [PubMed]