|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Gliogenesis requires the careful orchestration of migration, differentiation, and proliferation of progenitors. Signaling through the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been implicated in regulating these processes in a variety of cell types, including neural progenitors. By retroviral infection, we constitutively expressed an EGFR-GFP fusion protein in white matter glial progenitors at postnatal day 3 of the rat forebrain in vivo and analyzed the development of these cells over the subsequent 15 weeks. EGFR-GFP+ cells remained proliferative and migratory, gradually populating the brains ipsilateral and contralateral to the side of viral infection, but never differentiated into mature glia. The accumulation of these cells doubled the total cell density in white matter and led to a 10-fold increase in the abundance of glial progenitors, giving rise to a progenitor “hyperplasia.” The marker profile of infected cells, NG2+, olig2+, PDGFR-α+, nestin+, GFAP−, and CC1−, indicated a close resemblance to oligodendrocyte progenitors. Positive immunostaining for phosphorylated EGFR colocalized with punctate accumulation of EGFR-GFP, indicating that a subset of receptors was engaged in active signaling. Furthermore, EGF was required to observe phospho-tyrosine EGFR immunostaining of glial progenitors in culture. These observations suggest that constitutive EGFR expression can inhibit glial differentiation, but requires ligand as well.
The majority of gliogenesis in the rodent forebrain occurs during the first 2 weeks of postnatal development. During this time, glial progenitors migrate widely through the white matter and cortex, where they differentiate into oligodendrocytes and astrocytes. The molecular mechanisms that regulate glial progenitor cell migration are not well understood, but must be closely linked to their differentiation and proliferation, to assure the appropriate number and distribution ofglial cells inthe adult nervous system.
Several studies have implicated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in the migration, proliferation, and differentiation of neural progenitor cells. During embryonic development, EGFR plays a major role in cell migration (Bayer et al., 1991; Burrows et al., 1997, 2000; Caric et al., 2001; Boockvar et al., 2003; Ciccolini et al., 2005), proliferation (Gritti et al., 1999), and differentiation (Lillien, 1995; Viti et al., 2003; Sun et al., 2005), although the effects of EGFR signaling vary with the cell type and developmental time. EGFR-mediated signaling is involved in both radial and tangential modes of migration (Bayer et al., 1991). Moreover, recent studies have shown that the asymmetric distribution of EGFR on the cell membrane influences the final cell fate choice of embryonic progenitors (Sun et al., 2005). Additionally, neural progenitors from the adult forebrain subventricular zone (SVZ) also respond to EGFR activation with enhanced proliferation and migration (Craig et al., 1996; Doetsch et al., 2002). Although EGFR has been implicated in the regulation of all of the above-mentioned processes, its precise role in postnatal gliogenesis has not been well established.
Postnatally, EGFR is widely expressed by migrating progenitors, but as cells advance along their differentiation pathways, EGFR expression attenuates (Fox and Kornblum, 2005). Therefore, we hypothesized that a loss of EGFR expression might be required for glial differentiation and thus that extended EGFR expression in glial progenitors might inhibit their differentiation and promote extended migration and proliferation. To test this hypothesis, we infected glial progenitors in the neonatal rat white matter (predominantly oligodendrocyte progenitors) with a retrovirus that expresses an EGFR-GFP fusion protein (Sun et al., 2005), which enabled us to observe the infected cells and the membranous distribution of the receptor.
The EGFR-GFP-expressing progenitors remained highly migratory over an extended period of time (at least 15 weeks), allowing them to reach distant brain structures, mostly by migrating through white matter tracts, which they populated with increasing abundance. EGFR expression also kept them in an immature and proliferative state that resembled oligodendrocyte progenitors, characterized by the expression of NG2, olig2, PDGFR-α, and nestin. Over time, the animals developed a diffuse hypercellularity (or hyperplasia) of the white matter, due entirely to the accumulation of these progenitors. In rare instances, we observed the spontaneous formation of tumor masses composed of EGFR-GFP+ cells.
Three-day-old Sprague Dawley rats were anesthetized by immersion in an ice bath for 8 min. Animals’ heads were placed in a stereotactic apparatus (Stoelting, Avondale, IL). The bregma was identified, and a burr hole was made 2 mm lateral and 1 mm rostral. A 26 gauge Hamilton (Reno, NV) microsyringe was inserted to a depth of 1.9 mm, and 1 µd of virus was injected at a rate of 0.2 µd/min. Incisions were closed and animals allowed to recover. Brains were analyzed at 5 and 10 d postinjection (dpi) and 3, 9, and 15 weeks postinjection (wpi). Animals were anesthetized with ketamine-xylazine before cardiac perfusion with PBS and 4% paraformaldehyde, postfixed for 24–48 h, and then transferred to PBS until use. All animal experiments were performed according to the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Columbia University.
EGFR-GFP and CLE-GFP plasmids were generated by Sun et al. (2005) from the original pCLE retroviral vector (Gaiano et al., 1999) and were a kind gift from Dr. Sally Temple (University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY). Replication-deficient viruses with vsv-G coats were generated from these constructs as described previously (Kakita and Goldman, 1999). Viral titers were determined in colony-forming units (CFUs) by incubating C6 glioma cells with serial dilutions of retrovirus in 10-fold steps. At 48 h postinfection, the number of GFP+ cell clusters was counted. The CFUs were calculated by multiplying the number of GFP+ cell clusters by the dilution factor. The titer of both the CLE-GFP and EGFR-GFP viruses was 106/µl Viruses were injected as described above.
Forebrain subcortical white matter was dissected from Sprague Dawley rats [postnatal day 3 (P3)-P5], dissociated with a 0.025% trypsin-EDTA/0.25 mg/ml DNase solution, and filtered through a 35 µm Nitex mesh. The isolated cells were cultured in B104 conditioned media, as described previously (Canoll et al., 1996), for 2 d, during which time the cultures were infected with the EGFR-GFP retrovirus. B104 medium was then removed, and the cells were replated at 6000 cells/well in an eight-well culture slide (Nunc, Naperville, IL) and grown for either 4 d in basal medium (DMEM, N2, T3, 0.5% FBS, and penicillin/strepto-mycin/amphotericin) or basal medium with EGF (1 ng/ml) (Sigma, St. Louis,MO) forimmunostainingwithphospho-EGFRantibodyorfor 1 d for Ki67 staining. Cultures were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, washed with 1 × PBS, and stored at 4°C.
Immunocytochemistry was performed on brain sections from different time points after injections and on cells from the glial preps. Similar results were seen with cell preps from P3 or P5 animals. Fixed brains were cryopreserved in 30% sucrose in 1 × PBS and cryosectioned at 12 µm, and sections were stored at −80°C until used. Antibodies used were guinea pig anti-Olig2 (1:100; kind gift from Dr. Thomas Jessel, Columbia University, New York, NY), mouse anti-Nestin (rat 401) (1:100; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA), rabbit anti-GFAP (1:500; DAKO, Carpinteria, CA), rabbit anti-GFP (1:500; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), rabbit anti-Ki67 (1: 1000; NovoCastra, New Castle, UK), rabbit anti-NG2 (1:500; kind gift from Dr. William Stallcup, Burnham Institute for Medical Research, La Jolla, CA), sheep anti-EGFR (1:100; Millipore, Billerica, MA), mouse anti-CC1 (1:50; Merck Biosciences, Darmstadt, Germany), mouse anti-myelin basic protein (MBP) (1:1000; Covance, Harrogate, UK), mouse anti-phospho-EGFR-Y1068 (1:50; Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA), rabbit anti-phospho-EGFR-Y1173 (1:100; Stressgen, San Diego, CA), goat anti-PDGFR-α (1:80; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), mouse anti-O1 (1:100; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), and mouse anti-O4 (1:50; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank). Block with 10% horse serum, 0.1% Triton X-100 in 1 × PBS was performed for 30 min before incubation overnight with primary antibody at 4°C. The following day, the sections were washed extensively and incubated in secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. FITC- and TRITC-(Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA; Alexa, Invitrogen) conjugated secondary antibodies were used for double fluorescence. Sections were washed extensively again and stained with Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen), for nuclear visualization.
Histological sections and cell cultures were examined and photographed using a Zeiss Axiophot 200 fluorescence microscope equipped with an Axiocam (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) and Openlab imaging software (Improvision, Lexington, MA). Micrographs were further processed into composite figures using Adobe (San Jose, CA) Photoshop.
Coronal cryosections (12 µm) of brains were examined at the level of the injection site at 15 wpi with the pEGFR-GFP or pCLE. Cells positive for Hoescht nuclear dye were counted in the following way: four 40 × fields from three brains were photographed, and the number of cells staining positive for each marker was manually counted using Adobe Photoshop. Statistical analysis was performed using InStat v3.0 program. Cells grown in culture were counted in a similar manner: ten 20 × fields from two separate experiments were photographed, and the number of cells positive for Ki 67 and GFP was manually counted. The number of double-positive cells was expressed as a percentage of the total number of GFP+ cells per field.
To analyze the effects of EGFR signaling in vivo, we stereotactically injected either the CLE-GFP retrovirus, as a control, or the EGFR-GFP retrovirus (1 µl) (Fig. 1A) into the forebrain subcortical white matter of 3-d-old rats (P3) (Fig. 1B). Animals were killed at different time points, and brains were processed for immunohistochemical staining on either vibratome (100 µm) or cryostat sections (12 µm). Cells infected with either control or EGFR-containing virus were bright green under the fluorescence microscope and were easy to identify. The shortest time point analyzed was 5 dpi, and the longest was 15 wpi. We also analyzed several time points in between (10 dpi, 3 wpi, and 9 wpi), which allowed us to follow the dispersion of EGFR-GFP cells over time.
At 5 dpi with the control, CLE-GFP virus, the large majority of GFP+ cells were seen in the subcortical white matter near the injection site. Some cells had migrated short distances from the injection site along the white matter, into the overlying cortex and the striatum. Very few cells crossed the corpus callosum to the contralateral side, consistent with previous results (Kakita et al., 2003). Only rare GFP+ cells were seen in the SVZ and rostral migratory stream (RMS), suggesting that some small amount of retrovirus had diffused into the SVZ underlying the injection site or a few infected cells had migrated from white matter into the SVZ. In contrast, by 5 dpi in the brains infected with the EGFR-GFP retrovirus, the GFP+ cells had migrated further in the white matter than in the control brains (Fig. 1C). Many more of GFP+ cells had invaded the corpus callosum and had crossed to the other side into the contralateral white matter.
After 15 weeks, the differences were more marked. EGFR-GFP+ cells were widely dispersed throughout both the ipsilateral and contralateral sides (Fig. 1D). EGFR-GFP+ cells had populated the fornix and internal capsule, migrating both rostrally and caudally. The density of EGFR-GFP+ cells was the highest at the coronal plane of the injection site, gradually tapering off both rostrally and caudally. Considerable numbers of EGFR-GFP+ cells had migrated rostrally along the intrabulbar anterior commissure and into the ipsilateral olfactory bulb. No EGFR-GFP+ cells were found in the RMS. EGFR-GFP+ cells were found in the gray matter as well, including neocortex and striatum and septum, largely in the coronal plane of the injection. They populated these same structures on the contralateral side, although to a lesser extent. In the more caudal regions, almost no EGFR-GFP+ cells were found in the cortex, and their distribution in the ventral structures was restricted to the caudate-putamen (Fig. 1D). Comparing brains at different times after injections allowed us to monitor the extent of migration over time. Analysis of the locations of EGFR-GFP+ cells at 10 dpi, 3 wpi, and 9 wpi showed a progression of EGFR-GFP+ cells throughout the white matter (Fig. 1E).
EGFR-GFP + cells did not appear to infiltrate through the brain in a random pattern. These cells preferentially migrated through white matter tracts. EGFR-GFP+ cells that crossed the contralateral side either remained in white matter or entered the dorsal cortex in a pattern corresponding to the transcallosal fiber system, axons of which enter the dorsomedial cingulate and motor cortices (Fig. 2A), suggesting that they used axonal tracts to travel as previously reported for glial progenitors (Kakita et al., 2003). Similarly, EGFR-GFP+ cells descended into the striatum from subcortical white matter along axonal tracts (pencil fibers) (Fig. 2B). To highlight this anatomic connection, we performed double labeling for MBP and GFP, which showed the close association between the striatal pencil fibers and EGFR-GFP+ cells (Fig. 2C).
Retroviral infection of progenitors led to the constitutive expression of EGFR-GFP. To determine whether those cells expressed endogenous EGFR at the time of injection, we performed immunostaining for EGFR in the P3 rat brain. Numerous cells in white matter and in the dorsolateral SVZ were positive for EGFR (Fig. 3A–C). We infected brains with the control, CLE-GFP virus and then stained sections for both GFP and EGFR after 5 d. Approximately 40% of GFP+ cells expressed detectable levels of endogenous EGFR, denoting the presence of EGFR-expressing cells in the population we labeled with retrovirus (data not shown). Double labeling in the EGFR-GFP virus-infected brains at 5 dpi showed strong EGFR labeling in all infected/GFP+ cells (Fig. 3D–F), as expected. EGFR expression was also detected in a subset of uninfected cells (Fig. 3F). Triple-label immunofluorescence microscopy showed that many of the EGFR+/GFP− cells were uninfected NG2+ glial progenitors (data not shown). At 15 wpi in the EGFR-GFP-infected brains, there was a complete overlap between the GFP and EGFR labeling, signifying that the infected cells continued to express the EGFR-GFP fusion protein. We do not know whether these cells also continued to express endogenous EGFR. However, we were not able to detect EGFR+/GFP− cells in white matter (Fig. 3G–I), indicating that endogenous EGFR expression had fallen below detection in uninfected cells. Together, these results suggest that many of infected cells were expressing endogenous EGFR around the time of the infection, that the levels of endogenous EGFR subside during normal gliogenesis, and that the EGFR-GFP retrovirus produced a continued expression of the viral-derived EGFR throughout the entire 15 week interval. The long-term expression appears to be robust, because we find EGFR-GFP expression even 1 year after infection (data not shown and supplemental Fig. 2, available at http://www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material).
To analyze the effects of EGFR overexpression on the fates of infected cells, we stained cryosections obtained from animals infected with EGFR-GFP or CLE-GFP retroviruses and killed at 5 dpi and 15 wpi for cell lineage markers. In white matter, we examined the expression of nestin, olig2, vimentin, GFAP, CC1, PDGFR-α, Ki67, and NG2. At 5 dpi, EGFR-GFP-infected cells showed characteristics of immature glia: they were all positive for olig2 (Fig. 4B), which is expressed in neonatal forebrain glial progenitors (Marshall et al., 2005). The EGFR-overexpressing cells were also nestin+ (Fig. 4A), in contrast to the CLE-GFP+ cells, which did not express nestin (data not shown). Although a few of the CLE-GFP-infected cells were GFAP positive (data not shown), the majority of the control and EGFR-expressing cells were GFAP− (Fig. 4F), which indicates that these cells, at least at this early time, had not reached the stage of astrocyte development when they express GFAP (Zerlin et al., 2004). Almost all of the EGFR-GFP+ cells were NG2+ (Fig. 4C) and PDGFR-α+ (Fig. 4D), consistent with an early stage in the oligodendrocyte lineage (Hall et al., 1996; Nishiyama, 2001). None of the EGFR-GFP+ cells was CC1+ , indicating that they had not reached the stage of a more mature oligodendrocyte (Fig. 4E). Immunostaining for Ki67 showed that both EGFR-GFP-and CLE-GFP-infected cells were proliferative (40% and 20%, respectively, measured in the area of the subcortical white matter, located dorsal to the striatum) (Fig. 4G, data not shown).
At 15 wpi, all of the EGFR-GFP+ cells expressed markers characteristic for oligodendrocyte progenitors; they were all olig2+, NG2+, and PDGFR-α+ (Fig. 5B–D). In addition, some of the cells were nestin+ (Fig. 5A). None of the cells morphologically resembled myelinating oligodendrocytes or astrocytes (Fig. 5). None expressed CC1 or GFAP (Fig. 5E,F). The EGFR-GFP+ cells displayed long, lacy, sometimes elaborate processes (Fig. 5) and populated the white matter in far larger numbers than the control cells (Fig. 1). In contrast, by 15 wpi, most of the control, CLE-GFP virus-infected cells in white matter had differentiated into myelinating oligodendrocytes, displaying the characteristic myelin sheath labeling (supplemental Fig. 1, available at http://www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). Those cells that had migrated into the cortex and striatum had developed either into astrocytes or oligodendrocytes with radially oriented, lacy process patterns, but none of them exhibited the features of immature and/or undifferentiated/progenitor cells. Immunohisto-chemical analysis of CLE-GFP+ cells in white matter showed that these cells were nestin−, mostly NG2−, CC1+ , and GFAP− [supplemental Fig. 1 (available at http://www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material) and data not shown]. Few of these cells expressed olig2, which is present in a subpopulation of oligodendrocytes in the mature brain (data not shown). CLE-GFP+ cells at 15 wpi displayed a differentiated morphology and were positive for CC1, a marker for mature oligodendrocytes. In contrast to the control virus-infected cells, which did not show Ki67 labeling, we found at 15 wpi that EGFR-GFP+ cells were still proliferative. The Ki67 labeling index was highly variable; we found the highest labeling index (~30% of the total number of GFP+ cells) in the white matter dorsal to the striatum (Fig. 5G).
At all times there appeared to be an increase in total cell density in white matter, as measured by DAPI nuclear staining. To quantitate this phenomenon, we counted total cell numbers and GFP+ cell numbers in the midpoint of the callosum at the level of the injection site at 15 wpi (Fig. 6A–D). The total cell count in this area of white matter of rats infected with the EGFR-GFP virus was more than twice that in controls (4970 ± 182 per mm2 vs 2176 ± 64 per mm2), and the excess cell number was made up entirely of GFP+ cells. The Ki67 labeling data in vivo and in vitro (see below) suggests that the increased progenitor numbers are in part a result of continued, increased proliferation.
We looked at 15 wpi for phosphorylated EGFR, by immunostaining, as an indication of active signaling. Phospho-EGFR staining in vivo was located on the cell processes, overlapping with the areas of increased GFP density, indicating that at least some of the receptors were phosphorylated and active, or closely associated with activated endogenous receptor (Fig. 7A–C). Puncta of GFP accumulations suggest that the receptor density is increased in these regions, possibly because of receptor clustering, which leads to receptor activation (Bazley and Gullick, 2005) (Fig. 7A). These findings also indicate that only a small fraction of EGFR-GFP was phosphorylated, at least on this particular tyrosine residue (Y1068). Because tyrosine phosphorylation is a reversible event, this may reflect dynamic changes in receptor clustering and activation.
As another way to test whether the EGFR-GFP is actively signaling in infected cells, we isolated progenitors from P5 white matter, infected them with the EGFR-GFP retrovirus in vitro, and then grew them in basal medium with or without EGF (1 ng/ml) for the next 4 d. EGFR-GFP+ cells grown in the presence of EGF demonstrated a strong increase in phosphorylation of EGFR, shown through immunostaining for two phospho-tyrosines (Y1068 and Y1173), which colocalized with puncta of GFP expression (Fig. 7G–L), thus confirming that EGFR-GFP is actively signaling as a response to the ligand. Furthermore, double immunostaining for the phospho-Y1173 and phospho-Y1068 residues showed that both tyrosines were phosphorylated in the presence of EGF and were both colocalized with the puncta of GFP (Fig. 7J–L). There was an overlap between the foci of GFP accumulation and the immunostaining for both of the EGFR phospho-tyrosine (Fig. 7J). In contrast, there was little or no phospho-EGFR staining in cells grown in the absence of EGF (Fig. 7D–F).
We further analyzed the effects of EGFR signaling on the proliferation and differentiation of progenitors in vitro. Glial progenitors were infected in vitro with the EGFR-GFP virus as noted above, and proliferation was assayed after 4 d with or without EGF. Those grown in the presence of EGF displayed a higher Ki67 labeling index than those grown without EGF (33.3 ± 1.62% with EGF for 4 d; 14.72 ± 1.68% without EGF). This result is consistent with our findings in vivo (see above) and suggests again that increased proliferation is in part responsible for the progenitor hyperplasia. We also examined the differentiation of oligodendrocytes in these cultures. EGFR-GFP-expressing cells were analyzed for the presence of the O4 and O1 oligodendrocyte markers. In the presence of EGF, a smaller proportion of infected cells acquired the O4 and O1 antigens (14% O4+ with EGF vs 40% O4+ without EGF; 18% O1+ with EGF vs 41% O1 + without EGF). Therefore, the presence of the ligand appears to have a pronounced effect on the differentiation of the EGFR-GFP-expressing progenitors in vitro.
EGFR signaling regulates migration in a variety of cell types, including neuronal cells, fibroblasts, pancreatic epithelial cells, and Drosophila oocytes (Blay and Brown, 1985; Chen et al., 1994; Li et al., 1999, 2000; Miettinen et al., 2000; Caric et al., 2001; Duchek and Rorth, 2001). In the EGFR-null mice, CNS progenitors accumulate in proliferative zones (Threadgill et al., 1995), suggesting that EGFR signaling maybe required for migration during development.
Constitutive EGFR-GFP expression in postnatal progenitors kept them highly migratory, allowing them to infiltrate the brain to distances far from the site of retroviral infection. The distribution of labeled cells was not random, but rather occurred predominantly along white matter tracts. Many EGFR-GFP+ cells had migrated across the corpus callosum into the contralateral hemisphere. In addition, we observed some labeled cells in the ipsilateral cortex, likely to have ascended on radial glia during the first 2 weeks of postnatal life (Zerlin et al., 2004), similar to the control-infected cells. Glial progenitors infected with control virus migrate along similar routes, but to a much more limited extent (as seen in Kakita et al., 2003). Thus, EGFR expression does not appear to alter the directional or substrate preferences of migrating progenitors, but keeps the cells migratory for an extended period of time, allowing them to migrate greater distances than control cells. The prolonged migratory capacity of EGFR-GFP+ cells maybe a result of the increased density of the receptor on the membrane, allowing the cell to sense whatever minute amounts of the ligand exist in the surrounding areas (Caric et al., 2001).
Glial progenitors with constitutive EGFR expression failed to differentiate. Based solely on the expression of markers, the EGFR-GFP+ cells were immature, exhibiting the closest resemblance to precursors of oligodendrocyte lineage (NG2+, olig2+, PDGFR-α+, GFAP−, and CC1−). EGFR-GFP+ cells were also nestin+. Glial progenitors in vitro and in vivo will upregulate nestin expression in response to growth factor stimulation (Gallo and Armstrong, 1995; Canoll et al., 1999; Assanah et al., 2006). Whereas CLE-GFP+ cells have already exited the cell cycle and have differentiated at 15 wpi, ~30% of the total EGFR-GFP+ cells were Ki67+, although the proliferation index varied from region to region. We do not yet understand these variations, but they may reflect nonhomogeneous ligand(s) distribution in the brain.
EGFR expression is regulated during brain development. After an initial upregulation in germinal zones [ventricular zone (VZ) and SVZ] at midgestation, EGFR expression starts to decline afterbirth and into adulthood (Seroogy et al., 1995; Fox and Kornblum, 2005). Constitutive expression of EGFR in the embryonic VZ results in early overrepresentation of astrocytes, higher proliferation rates, and enhanced migration (Burrows et al., 1997). Similarly, it forces embryonic day 18 retinal progenitors to differentiate preferentially into Muller glia (Lillien and Wancio, 1998). Surprisingly, we found that abnormally prolonged EGFR expression in postnatal white matter progenitors does not cause the infected cells to differentiate into astrocytes. Furthermore, infected cells exhibited an arrest in their differentiation at a stage resembling oligodendrocyte progenitors. Thus, EGFR stimulation appears to have different effects on embryonic versus postnatal progenitors. This may reflect the differences in the types of progenitors infected, the progenitors’ intrinsic capacity to respond to EGFR stimulation, or differences in the environmental context. For example, other signaling molecules, such as FGF and BMP (which are known to affect glial differentiation), can regulate the way progenitor cells respond to EGFR stimulation (Lillien and Raphael, 2000). Studying the effects of these growth factors separately and in combination should provide important insights into how different glial progenitors integrate these signals during normal brain development and how imbalances in these signals can lead to abnormalities in glial migration, proliferation, and differentiation.
Our results show that overexpression of EGFR can give rise to a diffuse hyperplasia of the white matter composed of cells that closely resemble immature oligodendrocyte progenitors. In most cases, these lesions cause relatively subtle histological changes characterized by an increase in cell density without grossly distorting the brain architecture. The extent of these hyperplastic lesions would be difficult to determine if not for the GFP fluorescence allowing for definitive identification of infected cells.
We observed phosphorylation of the receptor in vivo in a proportion of EGFR-GFP+ cells, which strongly suggests that there are sufficient amounts of the ligand(s) in vivo to activate EGFR. Similarly, in cell cultures obtained from early postnatal white matter, the presence of EGF resulted in the phosphorylation of EGFR-GFP (Fig. 7), confirming that EGFR-GFP is actively signaling as a response to the ligand. As a result, EGFR-GFP-infected cells grown in the presence of the ligand showed a decrease in their differentiation and an increase in proliferation when compared with the EGFR-GFP+ cells grown without the ligand. All together, these observations suggest that the effects of EGFR expression in progenitors depend on the presence of an endogenous ligand or ligands. The nature and levels of such ligands in the adult CNS remain to be determined.
Several attempts to stimulate EGFR signaling in vivo have resulted in different outcomes, probably because of different technical approaches and different receptor types. For example, over-expression of the constitutively active receptor mutant, EGFR VIII, in specifically targeted nestin+ or GFAP+ cells using a TVA retroviral system, appeared not to generate any kind of hyperplastic cell population (Holland et al., 1998). The choice of the receptor mutant, EGFR VIII, which does not bind the ligand, in combination with the restricted target cell population may have led to the different outcome than in our study. In a different approach, NG2+ cells were modified to overexpress hEGFR either using transient transfection or using a transgenic mouse in which EGFR is transcribed under the control of the CNPase promoter. The NG2+/hEGFR/GFP+ and NG2+/CNPase-hEGFR/GFP+ cells showed increased migratory potential after being transplanted into the lateral ventricles of postnatal rats, but the cells did not appear to form accumulations or cause any other kind of histological abnormalities Indeed, these cells had differentiated by 4 weeks after transplantation, preferentially into astrocytes, but also into oligodendrocytes, depending on their final destination (Aguirre et al., 2005), an observation that contrasts with our findings that EGFR-expressing cells do not differentiate. However, the amount of EGFR introduced into cells, the extent of its expression after transient transfection versus retroviral infection, the choice of the targeted cell population, and the experimental manipulations of the cells before and during the transplantation may have enabled NG2+ cells to differentiate over time. Despite the differences in approach, these combined observations suggest that constitutive EGFR signaling is sufficient to promote and maintain progenitor migration. More recently, the same group has shown that EGFR over-expression increased the proliferation and migration of NG2+/Olig2+ glial progenitors in response to demyelinating lesions (Aguirre et al., 2007). Furthermore, they found that EGFR overexpression caused a reduction in the number of astrocytes and an increase in the number of oligodendrocytes seen in the demyelinating lesion, suggesting that EGFR overexpression may inhibit astrocyte differentiation and induce progenitors to differentiate along the oligodendrocyte lineage. We did not find any astrocytes in vivo, but we cannot conclude that the EGFR expression inhibited astrocyte differentiation, because the very large majority of cells initially infected belonged to the oligodendrocyte and not the astrocyte lineage. Indeed, when we analyzed progenitor cells infected with the EGFR-GFP virus in culture, we did find green, GFAP+ cells, presumably originating from proliferating astrocyte precursors in the cultures, but found the same proportions of these cells with and without EGF (our unpublished observations).
The deregulation of EGFR signaling is often manifested in human gliomas (Collins, 1995; Rao and James, 2004), and previous animal studies have shown that the expression of mutant EGFR VIII can cooperate with other genetic lesions to facilitate the formation of gliomas (Holland et al., 1998; Wei et al., 2006). However, the functional role of EGFR signaling in glioma formation is not understood. In this study, we show that the constitutive expression of EGFR-GFP in glial progenitors is sufficient to keep glial progenitors immature, proliferative, and migratory for an extended time and that this results in the consistent formation of diffuse hypercellular lesions that resemble the diffusely infiltrative component seen in human gliomas. Furthermore, some animals formed either multiple, small, proliferative nodules in the white matter (15 wpi and 6 months postinjection) (supplemental Fig. 2A,B, available at http://www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material) or large tumors composed of EGFR-GFP+ cells after a long period postinjection (from 6 months to 1 year) (supplemental Fig. 2. C,D, available at http://www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). Still, the majority of animals never developed tumors, but rather the diffuse hypercellularity. This stands in sharp contrast to the very rapid and consistent formation of malignant tumors that is seen when glial progenitors are infected with retroviruses that express the PDGF-β ligand (Assanah et al., 2006). Interestingly, the PDGF-infected cells show a similar immuno-phenotype (NG2+/Olig2+/PDGFR+/Nestin+/GFAP−). Additional studies are necessary to understand the formation of tumors in EGFR-GFP injected brains. Nevertheless, the continued proliferation of EGFR-GFP+ cells and their inability to differentiate may provide a fertile ground for the accumulation of further genetic abnormalities causing tumor formation.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants NS17125 (J.E.G.), KO8-NS045070 (P.C.), and MH157174-28 and NS07062-28 (S.I.). We thank Dr. Sally Temple for the CLE-GFP and EGFR-GFP construct, Drs. Tom Jessell and Bill Stallcup for antibodies, and Drs. Phyllis Faust and Carol Mason for sharing their microscope systems with us.