What could be the mechanism of increased HCV replication and accelerated fibrosis leading to liver mortality in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients? Potential explanations are the generalized immune suppression resulting from the loss of CD4+ T cells, an intrahepatic interaction between the viruses or their gene products (on hepatocytes or other hepatic cells), and an indirect effect on the liver secondary to HIV infection of other organs (Fig. ).
HIV-induced immune suppression may be a major factor. T-cell responses against HCV play an essential role in preventing progression from acute infection to chronicity (
98). In HIV-infected patients that develop acute hepatitis C, HCV-specific T-cell responses are markedly diminished (
34), a finding consistent with a higher rate of progression to chronicity in these patients (
123). In chronic hepatitis C, T-cell responses are generally weak, coinfected patients appear to have even weaker CD4
+ and CD8
+ responses (
29,
50), and these responses are not restored, even after CD4
+ cell counts recover in response to HAART (
41). Furthermore, there is evidence of decreased genetic diversity of HCV in HIV/HCV coinfection compared to that in monoinfection suggestive of reduced immune selective pressure (
65,
111), though this finding is controversial (
83,
107,
120). Following initiation of HAART, the genetic diversity of HCV was shown to increase (
111), at least in some genomic regions (
20). This increase in diversity seems to reflect an increased selective pressure, requires time to develop (
7), and is seen mostly in patients with virological and CD4
+ T-cell responses to HAART (
112,
133).
Differences in cytokine expression and a relative decrease in the number of CD4
+ T cells in the livers of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients (
27) may also play a role. The importance of T-cell depletion in promoting accelerated progression of hepatitis C is not unique to HIV coinfection. Experimental depletion of CD4
+ T cells in chimpanzees was associated with persistence of viremia after reinfection with HCV (
47), similar to what has been observed with coinfected patients (
56). In a different setting of immune suppression, recurrence of chronic hepatitis C after liver transplantation (for monoinfection) is accelerated compared to that in patients who have not received transplants. A significant risk factor is the use of steroid boluses (
18) or lymphocyte-depleting agents (
100) to treat acute rejections. Thus, the loss of CD4
+ T cells is likely to play a major role in disease progression.
Nonetheless, these immune-related mechanisms do not fully explain the faster progression of liver fibrosis. The liver injury in coinfection could also occur independently of the immune suppression as a result of the combined effect of the two viruses on hepatocytes. Whether HIV can directly infect hepatocytes is unclear. Human hepatocytes express CXCR4 and CCR5 but do not express CD4, and thus infection is not likely. Xiao et al. (
136) isolated a CD4-independent HIV strain from a patient and demonstrated in vitro infection of hepatoma cell lines and primary hepatocytes through CXCR4 and replication in them, possibly explaining early, uncorroborated reports of the detection of low levels of HIV in hepatocytes (
28). Recently, Ma et al. (
66) reported that a human hepatoma cell line, Huh-7.5, constitutively infected with the JFH-1 strain of HCV, expresses CD4 and can be infected by CXCR4- and CCR5-tropic HIV strains. Interestingly, HCV core antigen levels were increased in coinfected cells, consistent with the finding in vivo of a higher level of viremia. Despite these two interesting studies, convincing evidence of HIV/HCV coinfection of hepatocytes in vivo or even HIV monoinfection of hepatocytes remains to be proven and may not play a major role in the pathogenesis of disease progression. Even in the absence of hepatocyte coinfection, these cells are exposed to the effects of circulating viral proteins. The HIV envelope protein gp120 induces apoptosis of hepatocytes through CXCR4 G-protein-mediated signaling (
131), and as mentioned previously (
63), can also induce the expression of transforming growth factor β1, which is known to be profibrotic. Furthermore, in vitro exposure of hepatocytes to HCV E2 protein concomitantly with gp120 protein was shown to induce apoptosis via STAT1 phosphorylation and Fas ligand upregulation in a CXCR4-independent manner (
9,
81).
HIV infection of liver cells other than hepatocytes may also play a role in the progression of disease in coinfected patients. Like other macrophages, Kupffer cells can be infected with HIV (
53,
54), although monoinfection with HIV is not associated with significant liver pathology (
62). In HIV/HCV coinfection, on the other hand, it has been postulated that the HIV-infected Kupffer cells shift to a Th2 cytokine response, in turn influencing the hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), the major mediators of collagen deposition and fibrogenesis in the liver (
4). Modulation of the antigen-presenting function of the Kupffer cells by HIV in HCV coinfection may also play a role in the progression of liver damage. Hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells express CD4 and can be infected in vitro with HIV (
116). Finally, HSCs themselves may be a target of HIV. In a preliminary study, Tuyama et al. (
128) demonstrated the ability of HIV to infect and replicate in HSCs in vitro. HIV infection of the cells, or even exposure to gp120, led to an induction in collagen synthesis. Whether this finding is relevant to the progression of fibrosis in coinfected patients is difficult to determine. The current limitations of robust tissue culture models for HCV and the distinct cell-specific and species-specific tropism of the two viruses limit the ability to study their interaction.
One other potential explanation for disease progression may involve the gut-liver axis. During primary HIV infection, there is a significant depletion of CD4
+ T cells from gut-associated lymphoid tissue, a depletion that persists into chronic infection (
49) and is associated with increased gut permeability and microbial translocation (reflected by increased lipopolysaccharide [LPS] levels), causing a systemic immune activation (
24). Gut permeability and LPS-induced Kupffer cell activation are associated with liver injury in several conditions, including alcoholic liver disease, celiac sprue, gut graft-versus-host disease, and inflammatory bowel disease. Upon repeated exposure to LPS (as well as to other ligands of Toll-like receptors), monocytes and macrophages develop tolerance that limits their immune activation. In chronic hepatitis C, this tolerance to LPS is lost in peripheral monocytes and possibly in Kupffer cells due to the combined effects of gamma interferon, endotoxin, and HCV core protein (
39). This finding may explain the correlation between progression of liver disease and increased LPS levels (
8) that has been reported for patients with HIV/HCV coinfection.
Several abnormalities of the lymphoid system in patients with chronic hepatitis C have been described. Many HCV-infected patients exhibit evidence of polyclonal proliferation of B cells with autoantibody production, which can lead to the clinical syndromes of HCV-associated autoimmune disorders, mixed cryoglobulinemia, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (
44). The mechanism of B-cell activation by HCV is not entirely clear; the interaction of HCV E2 glycoprotein with CD81 has been shown to lead to nonspecific B-cell activation (
99). Furthermore, HCV has been shown to infect and replicate in B cells, T cells, and monocytes, though the evidence is not compelling and the clinical significance of this finding is unclear (
91). Dendritic cell dysfunctions have been reported in HCV-infected patients, but this finding is controversial (
1,
38,
75). HCV has also been implicated in inhibiting NK cell function by an interaction of E2 and CD81 (
127). In addition to affecting the functions of T cells, HIV alters the functions and phenotypes of dendritic (
92) and NK cells (
43), both of which play important roles in innate and adaptive immunity and likely contribute to the diminished HCV-specific immune response in coinfected individuals. The interplay between HCV and the lymphoid system could theoretically affect, or be affected by, coinfection with HIV. More research is needed to clarify this issue.
Potential mechanisms of the effects of coinfection may be learned from patients coinfected with HIV and GB virus C (GBV-C), a flavivirus closely related to HCV (reviewed in reference
55). In studies before the HAART era, GBV-C coinfection was reported to be associated with lower levels of HIV and better survival rates, although this finding was not shared by all studies. Similarly, some, but not all, studies demonstrate better response to HAART in coinfected patients. One putative mechanism is the binding of the GBV-C envelope protein to CD81 (an important coreceptor for HCV infection) on lymphocytes, resulting in downregulation of CCR5 (
82) and decreased HIV replication (
135).