PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Neuropsychopharmacology. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jan 1, 2010.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2706587
NIHMSID: NIHMS93482
Role of Mu and Delta Opioid Receptors in the Nucleus Accumbens in Cocaine-Seeking Behavior
Diana Simmons, B.S. and David W. Self, PhD.
Department of Psychiatry and the Neuroscience Graduate Program, The Seay Center for Basic and Applied Research in Psychiatric Illness, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, Texas 75390-9070
Correspondence: David W. Self, Department of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9070, Tele: 214-648-1237, Fax: 214-648-4947, david.self/at/utsouthwestern.edu
Previous studies suggest that opioid receptors in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), but not the nucleus accumbens (NAc), play a role in relapse to drug-seeking behavior. However, environmental stimuli that elicit relapse also release the endogenous opioid β-endorphin in the NAc. Using a within–session extinction/reinstatement paradigm in rats that self-administer cocaine, we found that NAc infusions of the mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonist DAMGO moderately reinstated responding on the cocaine-paired lever at low doses (1.0–3.0 ng/side), whereas the delta opioid receptor (DOR) agonist DPDPE induced greater responding at higher doses (300–3000 ng/side) that also enhanced inactive lever responding. Using doses of either agonist that induced responding on only the cocaine-paired lever, we found that DAMGO-induced responding was blocked selectively by pretreatment with the MOR antagonist CTAP, while DPDPE-induced responding was selectively blocked by the DOR antagonist naltrindole. Cocaine-primed reinstatement was blocked by intra-NAc CTAP but not naltrindole, indicating a role for endogenous MOR-acting peptides in cocaine-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior. In this regard, intra-NAc infusions of β-endorphin (100–1000 ng/side) induced marked cocaine-seeking behavior, an effect blocked by intra-NAc pretreatment with the MOR but not DOR antagonist. Conversely, cocaine seeking elicited by the enkephalinase inhibitor thiorphan (1–10 μg/side) was blocked by naltrindole but not CTAP. MOR stimulation in more dorsal caudate-putamen sites was ineffective, while DPDPE infusions induced cocaine seeking. Together, these findings establish distinct roles for MOR and DOR in cocaine relapse, and suggest that NAc MOR could be an important therapeutic target to neutralize the effects of endogenous β-endorphin release on cocaine relapse.
Keywords: reinstatement, β-endorphin, thiorphan, DAMGO, DPDPE, CTAP, naltrindole, relapse
Drug addiction involves dysregulation in brain reward circuitry leading to compulsive drug use (Dackis and O’Brien, 2001; Kalivas and Volkow, 2005; Koob and Le Moal, 2001). In addition to drug reward, the mesolimbic dopamine system plays an integral role in relapse to drug-seeking behavior, since stimuli that elicit drug seeking also activate dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) leading to dopamine release in forebrain regions such as the nucleus accumbens (NAc) (Phillips et al, 2003; Pruessner et al, 2004; Self and Nestler, 1998; Shalev et al, 2002; Spealman et al, 1999; Stewart, 2000). Opioid receptors also play a role in relapse to cocaine seeking in animal models, since systemic treatment with naltrexone inhibits cocaine seeking elicited by exposure to cocaine-associated cues (Burattini et al, 2008). Similarly, cocaine-primed cocaine seeking is blocked by systemic administration of the partial mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonist buprenorphine, the delta opioid receptor (DOR) antagonist naltrindole, or the nonspecific opioid antagonist naltrexone (Comer et al, 1993; Gerrits et al, 2005).
Stewart and colleagues found that opioid receptors in the VTA play a role in reinstatement of cocaine and heroin seeking, since intra-VTA morphine treatments trigger drug seeking in an extinction/reinstatement paradigm (Stewart, 1984), an animal model of relapse. This effect is thought to involve local disinhibition of dopamine neurons in the VTA leading to dopamine release in the NAc (Ford et al, 2006; Johnson and North, 1992; Leone et al, 1991). In contrast, previous studies suggest that opioid receptors localized in the NAc do not play a role in drug seeking, since intra-NAc morphine treatments fail to reinstate cocaine- or heroin-seeking (Stewart and Vezina, 1988; Tang et al, 2005), and blockade of NAc MOR with the selective MOR antagonist CTAP failed to significantly alter cocaine-primed reinstatement of cocaine seeking (Tang et al, 2005). However, endogenous opioid peptides such as β-endorphin are released in the NAc by cocaine and stressful situations (Roth-Deri et al, 2004; Roth-Deri et al, 2003; Zangen and Shalev, 2003), events that trigger reinstatement of cocaine seeking, and intra-NAc morphine infusions induce a conditioned place preference (van der Kooy et al, 1982).
Opioid receptors are highly expressed by NAc neurons (Mansour et al, 1995; Mansour et al, 1987), and local opioid infusions in the NAc modulate behavior in a biphasic manner. Thus, microgram doses of DAMGO (MOR agonist) or morphine infused in the NAc initially suppress locomotion but subsequently induce hyper-locomotion (Cunningham and Kelley, 1992; Meyer et al, 1994). Lower doses of DAMGO decrease the latency for hyper-locomotion to occur (Meyer et al, 1994). Since doses of agonists used in these locomotor studies are similar to those used in prior reinstatement studies, it is possible that the behavioral suppressive effects masked the potential of NAc opioid receptor stimulation to trigger reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior. Moreover, NAc infusions of opioid agonists induce feeding behavior but also with a prolonged latency to initiate feeding (Bakshi and Kelley, 1993; Kelley et al, 2005). Similarly, intra-NAc infusions of DAMGO increase the motivation for food on a progressive ratio reinforcement schedule, and where response breakpoints are obtained after some delay (Zhang et al, 2003). Therefore, it is possible that these delayed motivational effects reflect the initial suppressive effects of high dose MOR agonist infusions.
In this study, we investigated the role of NAc opioid receptors in reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior using MOR- and DOR-selective ligands and endogenous opioid peptides. We found that NAc infusions of MOR and DOR agonists effectively reinstate cocaine seeking through selective actions at their respective receptors. Stimulation of NAc opioid receptors by the endogenous peptides β-endorphin and enkephalins also induced cocaine-seeking behavior. The results clearly establish that either MOR or DOR stimulation in the NAc is sufficient to elicit cocaine-seeking behavior, and that MOR receptors play an important role in cocaine-primed relapse. These findings also suggest that persistent neuroadaptations in NAc opioid receptors following chronic cocaine use could contribute to drug-seeking behavior in prolonged abstinence.
Animals and housing conditions
Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 225–275g (Charles River Laboratories, Kingston, NY) were individually housed in wire cages with food and water available ad libitum, except during lever press training. Experiments were conducted during the light cycle of a 12:12-h light:dark cycle (lights on at 0700 hours) in accordance with guidelines established by the National Institute of Health and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Sucrose Lever Press Training and Surgery
Lever press training, self-administration, and reinstatement testing were performed in operant test chambers (Med-Associates, East Fairfield, VT). Chambers were equipped with two response levers and an infusion pump as described previously (Edwards et al, 2007). Animals were food-restricted to prevent weight gain and trained to lever-press for sucrose pellets on a fixed ratio 1 (FR1) reinforcement schedule until an acquisition criteria of 100 sucrose pellets consumed for 3 consecutive test days was reached. Following lever-press training, animals were fed ad libitum for at least 1 day prior to surgery. Animals were anesthetized and implanted with a chronic indwelling catheter into the jugular vein that exited subcutaneously on the back. An intra-cranial, 26-guage bilateral guide cannula was aimed at the NAc (±1.5 mm lateral; 1.7 mm anterior to bregma; −5.7 ventral to dura with the level skull) or caudate putamen (±1.5 mm lateral; 1.7 mm anterior to bregma; −3.2 mm ventral to dura) (Paxinos and Watson, 1998). Dummy and infusion cannulae (33 gauge) were cut to extend 1 mm beyond the guide cannulae tip, and dummy cannulae remained in place until the day of intracranial drug infusion. Animals were allowed 5–7 days to recover prior to starting the experiment.
Cocaine self-administration and within-session reinstatement testing
Animals were tested in a within-session extinction/reinstatement paradigm as described previously (Bachtell et al, 2005). Briefly, animals self-administered cocaine (0.5 mg/kg in 0.1 ml over 5 s, time-out 15 s) in daily 4-h sessions for 5–6 days/week until a criteria of 3 consecutive days of <10% variance in mean cocaine intake was reached (~3 weeks). During the 5 s injection a cue light above the lever was illuminated, while the house light was turned off for the entire injection and time-out period. Subsequently, animals were trained in the within-session extinction paradigm that consisted of 1-h cocaine availability followed by 3-h extinction conditions where only response-contingent injection cues were available. Animals extinguished responding to criteria of ≤ 5 responses at either the drug-paired or inactive lever for the final h of the session for at least 3 consecutive sessions, while maintaining a minimum of 15 self-administered cocaine injections with ± 10% variability in the first h of the session. Mean cocaine self-administration on the test day was 25 ± 0.74 (NAc) and 26 ± 0.95 (CPu) injections/h. Test days were conducted with an intra-NAc infusion of MOR and DOR agonists alone (0.5 μl/side over 2 min) or in combination as sequential antagonist/agonist infusions (1.0 μl/side total volume) immediately prior to the final h of the test session. For cocaine priming experiments, animals received NAc or CPu antagonist infusions followed immediately by iv priming with saline (0.4 ml) or cocaine (2.0 mg/kg in 0.4 ml). Following each test day, animals returned to within-session extinction training until stable self-administration and extinction criteria were reached for at least 2 consecutive sessions prior to the next test. Animals received a maximum of 8 intracranial test infusions.
Locomotor testing
Some animals trained in the within-session reinstatement paradigm were given 1 week off from cocaine self-administration and tested for locomotor responses to agonist infusions in the NAc or CPu using peak doses for reinstatement that were selective for the drug-paired lever. The locomotor testing apparatus consisted of a circular-shaped plexiglass arena with 12 cm wide metal floors (Med-Associates) with four pairs of photocells located at 90-degree intervals around the 1.95 m perimeter to record locomotor activity. Animals were habituated for 2 h in the dark followed by an intra-NAc or intra-CPu drug infusion and returned to the locomotor chambers for 2 h of subsequent testing. Testing of each drug was randomized and done on consecutive days. Animals received 5 injections in locomotor tests.
Histological Confirmation of injection sites
Animals were anesthetized with chloral hydrate, and cresyl violet (0.3 μl) was infused into the NAc or CPu through the guide cannula. Animals were immediately decapitated and brains removed. 0.8 mm thick slices were collected throughout the forebrain and analyzed under a dissecting microscope for the location of the infusion sites according to the coordinates of Paxinos and Watson (Paxinos and Watson, 1998).
Drugs
Drugs used were DAMGO (D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,glycinol5)-enkephalin), DPDPE ((D-Pen2,D-Pen5)-Enkephalin), CTAP (D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2), β-endorphin, met-enkephalin, and thiorphan (Bachem Bioscience Inc., King of Prussia, PA), and naloxone and naltrindole (Sigma-Aldrich, Atlanta, GA). Ligands were dissolved in 0.9% sterile saline except thiorphan which was dissolved in 1:4 DMSO:saline. Cocaine hydrochloride was obtained from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (Research Triangle Park) and dissolved in 0.9% sterile saline.
Statistical Analysis
Since not all animals completed an experiment, data were analyzed using a 2 factor mixed regression analysis (SAS 9.1.3) of treatment × lever, followed by main effects analysis of each lever separately. Post-Hoc tests utilized 1- or 2-tailed Dunnett’s tests where appropriate for comparison with controls and Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test for pair-wise comparison where appropriate. Locomotor data were analyzed by 1-way repeated measures ANOVA on treatment for each h tested. Post-Hoc tests utilized Dunnett’s 1-tailed test for comparison with controls.
MOR and DOR involvement in reinstatement
We first determined whether NAc infusions of the MOR-selective agonist DAMGO and the DOR-selective agonist DPDPE could reinstate non-reinforced drug-paired lever responding following extinction of cocaine seeking. Intra-NAc infusions of DAMGO produced an inverted-U shaped dose-response curve (Figure 1a) for non-reinforced responding on the drug-paired but not inactive lever (dose × lever: F6,161 = 2.37, p = 0.032) with a main effect of both dose (F6,161 = 3.52, p = 0.003) and lever (F1,161 = 46.01, p < 0.001). DAMGO induced moderate peak rates of responding at very low doses (1–3 ng/side) when compared to vehicle infusions without increasing inactive lever responding, whereas higher doses (10 ng/side) led to reduced responding (drug-paired lever: F6,66 = 3.33, p = 0.006; inactive lever: F6,66 = 1.13, p = NS). Similarly, intra-NAc infusions of DPDPE produced an inverted U-shaped dose-response curve (Figure 1b), but induced greater responding and at higher doses of 300–3000 ng/side (dose: F6,113 = 12.09, p < 0.001; lever: F1,113 = 28.16, p < 0.001). Unlike DAMGO, DPDPE induced substantial and significant lever pressing of both drug-paired and inactive levers compared to vehicle (drug-paired lever: F6,40 = 11.37, p < 0.001; inactive lever: F6,40 = 3.34, p = 0.009). Inactive lever responding significantly increased only at the peak dose for drug-paired lever responding (1000 ng/side).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Intra-NAc infusions of (a) the mu-opioid receptor selective agonist DAMGO or (b) the delta-opioid receptor selective agonist DPDPE increase non-reinforced drug-paired lever responding in a within-session reinstatement procedure. Data represent the mean (more ...)
Antagonist inhibition of agonist-mediated reinstatement
To determine whether DAMGO-stimulated reinstatement of cocaine seeking was mediated by MOR stimulation in the NAc, we tested the ability of the MOR-selective antagonist CTAP to block DAMGO-primed reinstatement using the lowest effective dose from the previous experiment (1 ng/side). Intra-NAc pretreatment of CTAP dose-dependently blocked DAMGO-primed reinstatement (Figure 2a; dose × lever: F6,172 = 7.82, p < 0.001), with a main effect of dose (F6,172 = 7.78, p < 0.001) and lever (F1,172 = 123.36, p < 0.001). Non-reinforced responding at the drug-paired lever was blocked with maximally effective doses as low as 0.1 ng/side of CTAP (drug-paired lever: F6,67 = 8.59, p < 0.001; inactive lever: F6,67 = 1.19, p = NS). Similarly, we tested the DOR-selective antagonist naltrindole against the lowest effective dose for DPDPE-induced reinstatement that did not increase inactive lever responding (300 ng). Figure 2b shows that intra-NAc treatment of naltrindole reduced DPDPE-primed reinstatement in a dose dependent manner achieving control levels at 1000 ng/side (dose × lever: F4,139 = 2.85, p = 0.026; dose: F4,139 = 11.35, p < 0.001; lever F1,139 = 55.54, p < 0.001). Drug-paired lever responding was significantly attenuated starting at 300 ng/side with maximal suppression at 1000 ng/side (F4,58 = 11.63, p < 0.001). Naltrindole produced some mild suppression of responding on the inactive lever (inactive lever: F4,58 = 2.48, p = 0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intra-NAc pretreatment with (a) the mu-opioid receptor selective antagonist CTAP followed by 1 ng DAMGO and (b) the delta-opioid receptor selective antagonist naltrindol followed by 300 ng DPDPE dose-dependently attenuates reinstatement of cocaine seeking. (more ...)
Drug specificity and antagonist inhibition of cocaine mediated reinstatement
To determine whether DAMGO and DPDPE-induced cocaine seeking was specific to MOR or DOR blockade, MOR and DOR agonists and antagonists were tested in a cross-blockade experimental design. Animals were given intra-NAc infusions of DAMGO (1 ng/side or DPDPE (300 ng/side) following pretreatment with maximally effective doses of CTAP (30 ng/side), naltrindole (1000 ng/side), or vehicle. Figure 3a shows that DAMGO-induced reinstatement of drug-paired lever responding was selectively blocked by CTAP but not naltrindole when compared to vehicle (treatment × lever: F2,82 = 5.09, p = 0.008; treatment: F2,82 = 4.84, p = 0.01; lever: F1,82 = 68.65, p < 0.001). CTAP significantly attenuated drug-paired lever responding (F2,29 = 5.61, p = 0.009) with no effect on inactive lever responding (F2,29 = 0.40, p = NS). Conversely, Figure 3b shows that DPDPE-induced reinstatement was selectively blocked by naltrindole but not CTAP (treatment: F2,40 = 8.83, p < 0.001; lever: F1,40 = 39.01, p < 0.001), with attenuation mainly on the drug-paired lever (F2,13 = 5.65, p = 0.017) and a trend for reduction in lower responding on the inactive lever (F2,13 = 2.87, p = 0.092). Together, these results indicate that selective stimulation of either MOR or DOR in the NAc is sufficient to independently trigger cocaine-seeking behavior.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Reinstatement induced by 1 ng DAMGO is blocked by intra-NAc pretreatment with CTAP and not naltrindole. (b) Reinstatement induced by 300 ng DPDPE is blocked by intra-NAc pretreatment with naltrindole and not CTAP. (c) Reinstatement induced by intravenous (more ...)
Given that cocaine injections are known to increase endogenous opioid release in the NAc, we tested whether MOR or DOR in the NAc play a role in cocaine-primed reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior. Animals were given NAc pretreatments with vehicle, CTAP, or naltrindole immediately prior to an iv cocaine injection (2 mg/kg) in the reinstatement paradigm. Since the peak dose of CTAP (30 ng against 1 ng DAMGO) had no effect on cocaine-primed reinstatement (data not shown), we tested a higher dose of CTAP (3 μg/side) more commonly used in intracranial studies (Soderman and Unterwald, 2008; Tang et al, 2005), along with the 1 μg/side dose of naltrindole. CTAP’s affinity for MOR (2.36 ± 0.46 nM) is 15.7 times lower than that of naltrindole for DOR (0.15 ± 0.01 nM) (Bonner et al, 2000; Clayson et al, 2001; Pelton et al, 1986; Portoghese et al, 1988), indicating that relatively higher amounts of CTAP than naltrindole may be required to inhibit endogenous opioid activity at MOR than DOR. Furthermore, the doses of CTAP and naltrindole used were roughly molar equivalents (5.4 μM and 4.8 μM, respectively). Intra-NAc pretreatment with CTAP significantly reduced cocaine-primed reinstatement compared to vehicle pretreatment (Figure 3c), whereas pretreatment with naltrindole did not (treatment × lever: F2,82 = 4.17, p = 0.019; treatment: F2,82 = 5.12, p = 0.008; lever: F1,82 = 62.51, p = 0.001). CTAP significantly attenuated drug-paired lever responding in response to an iv cocaine prime without affecting inactive lever responding (drug-paired lever: F2,17 = 7.08, p = 0.006; inactive lever: F2,17 = 0.38, p = NS). These findings indicate that endogenous opioid release in the NAc contributes to cocaine-primed reinstatement of cocaine seeking through activation of MOR but not DOR.
Endogenous opioid peptides reinstate cocaine seeking in the NAc
The next set of experiments determined the ability of endogenous opioids to reinstate cocaine seeking using intra-NAc infusions of β-endorphin and met-enkephalin. Intra-NAc infusions of β-endorphin dose-dependently reinstated responding on the cocaine-paired lever with effective doses ranging from 100–1000 ng/side (Figure 4a; dose × lever: F4,103 = 4.07, p = 0.004; dose: F4,103 = 12.11, p < 0.001; lever: F1,103 = 51.27, p < 0.001). β-endorphin infusions significantly increased drug-paired lever responding (F4,42 = 8.82, p < 0.001) with a minor increase in inactive lever responding at the highest dose (inactive lever: F4,42 = 7.32, p < 0.001). In contrast, intra-NAc infusions of met-enkephalin failed to reinstate cocaine seeking up to doses as high as 10 μg/side (Figure 4b; F5,102 = 0.44, p = NS). Since previous studies used enkephalin derivatives, suggesting that enkephalins are degraded too rapidly to produce effects in behavioral tests (Kalivas et al, 1985; Phillips et al, 1983), we used the enkephalinase inhibitor thiorphan to determine if the accumulation of endogenously released enkephalins would reinstate cocaine seeking. Intra-NAc thiorphan infusions effectively reinstated responding to levels similar to β-endorphin (Figure 4c; dose: F4,92 = 6.77, p < 0.001; lever: F1,92 = 63.27, p < 0.001). Thiorphan induced prominent responding on the drug-paired lever (F4,36 = 4.55, p = 0.004) with minor increases in responding on the inactive lever at the peak dose of 3.0 μg that approached significance (F4,36 = 2.48, p = 0.061). These findings indicate that either MOR-preferring (β-endorphin) or DOR-preferring (enkephalins) endogenous opioid peptides in the NAc are capable of eliciting cocaine-seeking behavior.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Intra-NAc infusion of (a) the endogenous opioid peptide β-endorphin dose-dependently reinstates drug-paired lever responding, (b) whereas met-enkephalin has no effect. (c) Intra-NAc infusion of the enkephalinase inhibitor thiorphan significantly (more ...)
Receptor specificity of endogenous opioid-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking
While β-endorphin and enkephalins preferentially interact with MOR and DOR respectively, they also interact with other opioid receptors. We tested the ability of 3 μg CTAP, 1 μg naltrindole, and the less specific opioid antagonist naloxone to block β-endorphin- and thiorphan-induced reinstatement. Animals were given NAc infusions of maximally effective doses of β-endorphin (1 μg/side) or thiorphan (3 μg/side) immediately following vehicle, CTAP (3 μg/side), naltrindole (1 μg/side), or naloxone (10 μg/side) pretreatments. Figure 5a shows that β-endorphin-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking was selectively attenuated by CTAP or naloxone, but not naltrindole (treatment × lever: F3,74 = 4.83, p = 0.004; treatment: F3,74 = 10.45, p < 0.001; lever: F1,74 = 66.94, p < 0.001), specifically reducing responding on the drug-paired lever (F3,27 = 12.63, p < 0.001) and not inactive lever (F3,27 = 0.94, p = NS). Conversely, Figure 5b shows that reinstatement elicited by the enkephalinase inhibitor thiorphan was blocked selectively by naltrindole or naloxone, but not significantly by CTAP (treatment: F3,69 = 5.55, p = 0.002; lever: F1,69 = 15.19, p < 0.001). Naltrindole and naloxone reduced thiorphan-induced responding on the drug-paired and not inactive lever (drug-paired lever: F3,26 = 4.45, p = 0.012; inactive lever: F3,26 = 2.23, p = NS). Thus, the endogenous opioid peptide β-endorphin reinstates cocaine seeking through selective activation of NAc MOR, while elevations in endogenous enkephalin levels trigger cocaine seeking primarily through DOR activation, consistent with their preference for these receptors.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) Reinstatement induced by 1 μg β-endorphin is blocked by intra-NAc pretreatment with CTAP or naloxone, but not naltrindole. (b) Reinstatement induced by 3 μg thiorphan is blocked by intra-NAc pretreatment with naltrindole or (more ...)
Regional specificity for MOR- but not DOR-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior
To determine whether MOR and DOR stimulation of cocaine seeking was specific to the NAc, or due to potential spread up the cannulae shaft, we infused effective doses of all agonists 2.5 mm dorsal to the NAc site in the caudate putamen (CPu), a region shown to have similar expression patterns of opioid receptors as the NAc. While none of the MOR-acting agonists or the enkephalinase inhibitor induced reinstatement in the CPu (Figure 6a), CPu infusions of DPDPE were sufficient to stimulate responding (treatment × lever: F4,97 = 2.41, p = 0.05; treatment: F4,97 = 6.51, p < 0.001; lever: F1,97 = 40.91, p < 0.001), with increases in responding on both the drug-paired lever (F4,38 = 4.61, p = 0.004) and inactive lever (F4,38 = 3.43, p = 0.017). It should be noted, however, that the 300 ng/side dose of DPDPE elicited twice as much responding in the NAc than in the CPu. In addition, intra-CPu pretreatment with CTAP at a dose that blocked cocaine-primed reinstatement in the NAc failed to alter cocaine seeking when infused into the CPu (Figure 6b) compared to vehicle-pretreated animals (treatment × lever: F1,14 = 0.08, p = NS; treatment: F1,14 = 0.09, p = NS; lever: F1,14 = 10.21, p < 0.01). Together, these data indicate that MOR involvement in reinstatement of cocaine seeking is specific to the NAc, while DOR in both sites are capable of triggering this behavior.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(a) Effective NAc doses of DAMGO, β-endorphin and thiorphan are ineffective at reinstatement when infused in the CPu, while intra-CPu DPDPE induces significant drug-paired and inactive lever responding. (b) Pretreatment with intra-CPu infusions (more ...)
Opioid agonist induction of locomotor behavior in cocaine-trained animals
Following 1 week withdrawal from cocaine self-administration and reinstatement testing, the locomotor response to intracranial infusions of DAMGO, DPDPE, β-endorphin and thiorphan was tested using doses that produced peak and primarily drug-paired lever responding when infused in the NAc. Figure 7a and 7b show that all treatments increased locomotion for 1 h after infusion into the NAc when compared to vehicle infusions (F4,46 = 8.429, p < 0.001), while only β-endorphin increased locomotion for at least 2 h after infusion (F4,41 = 8.258, p < 0.001). Thus, the lower doses of DAMGO and DPDPE that triggered cocaine seeking produced psychomotor effects without the delay typically observed with higher doses in previous studies. Figures 7c and 7d show that very similar locomotor responses were produced by infusions of DPDPE and β-endorphin in the CPu (F4,16 = 5.427, p = 0.006), with a trend for thiorphan to increase locomotor activity during the first hour (p = 0.059). In contrast, intra-CPu infusions of DAMGO failed to significantly increase locomotion. Together, these findings suggest that while psychomotor activation may accompany reinstatement of cocaine seeking with NAc infusions, similar locomotor responses with CPu infusions are dissociated from cocaine seeking in many cases.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Effects of reinstating doses of agonist treatments on horizontal locomotion in cocaine-trained animals. (a) Timeline of locomotor behavior during habituation for 2 h and following intra-NAc infusion of opioid agonist. (b) All agonists increase locomotor (more ...)
Injection Sites
Figure 8 illustrates the localization of all infusion sites in the NAc and CPu used in this study. Fourteen animals were eliminated from NAc studies, and 3 animals were eliminated from CPu studies, due to misplacement of one or both cannulae.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Localization of infusion sites in the medial NAc core and CPu (+1.2 through +2.2 mm from Bregma, Paxinos and Watson, 1998).
This study found that selective stimulation of either MOR or DOR in the NAc is sufficient to reinstate cocaine-seeking behavior in rats following extinction of cocaine self-administration. Thus, NAc infusions of either the MOR-selective agonist DAMGO or the DOR-selective agonist DPDPE effectively elicited cocaine-seeking responses on the drug-paired lever that delivered cocaine injections during prior self-administration. The threshold dose for reinstating cocaine seeking was 300 times lower with DAMGO (1 ng/side) than with DPDPE (300 ng/side), while DPDPE induced greater peak rates of responding and was associated with generalized but lower rates of responding on the inactive lever. This latter effect with DPDPE could be related to psychomotor activation rather than motivation for cocaine, or an inability to appropriately discriminate the drug-paired from inactive levers with increased DOR stimulation, although a lower dose of DPDPE selectively induced responding on the drug-paired lever. Both of these metabolically stable opioid peptide agonists produced an inverted U-shaped dose-response curve indicating that higher doses were ineffective, potentially explaining the failure to detect morphine-induced reinstatement of drug seeking at microgram doses used in previous studies (Stewart et al, 1988; Tang et al, 2005).
In contrast, intra-NAc infusions of the endogenous opioid peptide β-endorphin induced cocaine seeking with a monophasic dose-response curve up to 1 μg/side, possibly reflecting the sensitivity of this peptide to metabolic degradation. Importantly, the reinstating effects of both DAMGO and β-endorphin were blocked by the MOR-selective antagonist CTAP, and not by the DOR-selective antagonist naltrindole. The ability of DAMGO and β-endorphin to reinstate cocaine seeking was localized to the NAc, since the failure of more dorsal CPu infusions to reinstate responding negates the possibility of diffusion along the cannulae shaft or into the cerebral ventricles. These data firmly establish that MOR in the NAc mediate relapse to cocaine-seeking behavior. While stimulation of MOR in dorsomedial CPu is ineffective, dorsolateral CPu sites could be involved in cocaine seeking given that inactivation of this site reduces cocaine-seeking behavior (See et al, 2007).
In addition, infusions of CTAP into the NAc, but not the CPu, attenuated cocaine-primed reinstatement, possibly relating to the ability of cocaine to increase endogenous β-endorphin release in the NAc (Olive et al, 2001; Roth-Deri et al, 2003). Higher doses of CTAP (3 μg) were required to attenuate cocaine-primed reinstatement than DAMGO-primed reinstatement (30 ng), possibly reflecting higher concentrations of cocaine-induced β-endorphin release relative to the very low doses of DAMGO that were effective (1–3 ng/side). The high dose of CTAP that attenuated cocaine-primed reinstatement also blocked β-endorphin-primed reinstatement that required a higher dose range (0.1 – 1 μg) than found with DAMGO.
Cocaine-induced β-endorphin release in the NAc is blocked by dopamine receptor antagonist infusions in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus (Doron et al, 2006), the primary source for β-endorphin innervation of the NAc. β-endorphin release in the NAc also is induced by exposure to footshock stress, or the unmet expectation of cocaine reward under extinction conditions (Roth-Deri et al, 2003; Zangen et al, 2003), situations that elicit cocaine-seeking behavior. Thus, taken together with our findings, β-endorphin stimulation of MOR in the NAc could contribute to cocaine seeking elicited by cocaine priming, exposure to cocaine-associated environments, and stressful events. In contrast, a previous study found that NAc pretreatment with CTAP does not block cocaine-primed reinstatement using longer acting intraperitoneal cocaine priming injections (Tang et al, 2005), whereas effective blockade was found using shorter acting intravenous cocaine priming in our study. Another difference could involve the use of the within- versus between-session extinction/reinstatement paradigms.
Contrary to DAMGO and β-endorphin, cocaine seeking induced by DPDPE was blocked by pretreatment with DOR- but not the MOR-selective antagonist in the NAc. NAc infusions of the enkephalinase inhibitor thiorphan (to elevate endogenous enkephalins) also reinstated cocaine seeking, and the effect was blocked by DOR antagonist pretreatment, although marginal (non significant) attenuation was found with the MOR antagonist potentially relating to enkephalin activity at MOR. DOR stimulation in more dorsal CPu sites with DPDPE also induced a moderate degree of cocaine seeking, but with greater efficacy in the NAc. Moreover, the reinstating effect of DPDPE in the CPu was accompanied by significant inactive lever responding, an effect not found with this DPDPE dose in the NAc, and potentially relating to psychomotor activation as discussed above. In this regard, infusions of the enkephalinase inhibitor thiorphan in the CPu failed to reinstate cocaine seeking, and had no effect on inactive lever responding in either striatal site. Together, the double dissociation with MOR- and DOR-selective ligands clearly indicates that mu and delta opioid receptors in the NAc mediate cocaine seeking through distinct and independent mechanisms.
Interestingly, blockade of DOR in the NAc failed to attenuate cocaine-primed reinstatement of cocaine seeking. Whether cocaine increases extracellular enkephalins in the NAc is unknown, but cocaine acutely increases preproenkephalin expression throughout the striatum (Hurd and Herkenham, 1992), although this acute effect is diminished with chronic cocaine administration (Arroyo et al, 2000; Mantsch et al, 2004). One study found that systemic administration of naltrindole decreases cocaine self-administration but only at doses that also suppressed locomotor behavior (de Vries et al, 1995). Another study showed reduced lever pressing for cocaine irrespective of reinforcement schedule (Reid et al, 1995), and intra-NAc infusions of an irreversible DOR alkylating analog of naltrindole (Portoghese et al, 1990) decreased responding for cocaine on a more demanding progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement (Ward and Roberts, 2007), suggesting generalized effects on motor performance. In contrast, icv administration of the naltrindole analog strongly reduced heroin self-administration while only modestly decreasing cocaine self-administration on a less demanding fixed ratio reinforcement schedule (Martin et al, 2000), suggesting that endogenous DOR activity plays little role in cocaine’s effects. Similarly, our results are consistent with the notion that endogenous release of enkephalins in the NAc does not contribute to cocaine-primed reinstatement of cocaine seeking, but further tests are needed to determine whether cocaine seeking induced by stress or cocaine-associated cues involves endogenous enkephalinergic activity at NAc DOR.
Intra-NAc infusions of MOR and DOR agonists at doses that effectively reinstated cocaine seeking also increased horizontal locomotion, with β-endorphin infusions producing prolonged effects over 2-h of testing. Infusions of all treatments into the dorsomedial CPu also increased locomotion to similar levels, with the exception of the MOR agonist DAMGO, whereas only the DOR agonist DPDPE triggered cocaine seeking in this region. While these data support the notion that DPDPE-induced reinstatement may be related to psychomotor activation, the dissociation of locomotor activity and cocaine seeking with infusions of β-endorphin and thiorphan in the CPu suggest that the reinstating effects of these treatments in the NAc are not related to generalized psychomotor activation. Moreover, while it could be argued that DAMGO-induced reinstatement is related to psychomotor activation, the lack of increases in inactive lever responding with DAMGO infusions suggests that reinstatement reflects motivational rather than motor effects. In contrast to reinstatement of cocaine seeking, NAc infusions of higher doses of DAMGO (0.25 – 2.5 μg) induce a delayed increase in locomotion and preference for sucrose and high fat foods often after a period of behavioral suppression (Cunningham et al, 1992;Meyer et al, 1994; Zhang and Kelley, 1997; Kelley et al, 2005), whereas we found that very low doses induce locomotion and cocaine seeking without delay. These findings suggest that lower doses of DAMGO could be employed to elicit appetitive behavior without delay in future studies.
Although MOR and DOR are coupled to similar intracellular signaling pathways, their distinct involvement in modulating drug-seeking behavior can be attributed to differences in their sub-anatomical distribution. MOR are largely expressed extrasynaptically on dendrites and dendritic shafts of GABAergic and cholinergic cells within striatal patches (Svingos et al, 1997; Wang and Pickel, 1998) where they modulate excitatory and GABAergic input to NAc neurons (Gracy et al, 1997). Presynaptic MOR can also modulate the release of GABA onto NAc neurons (Svingos et al, 1997). DOR can either directly or indirectly modulate dopamine release through expression on dopamine terminals or on GABAergic terminals apposed to dopamine terminals. DOR also can modulate postsynaptic responses in spiny neurons that receive dopamine input (Svingos et al, 1999). MOR co-localize predominantly with preprotachykinin positive neurons in patch compartments that constitute the direct striatal output, and more rarely with preproenkephalin positive neurons of the striatal matrix that constitute the indirect output (Furuta et al, 2002). The differential expression patterns of MOR and DOR lend them different mechanisms of action, with DOR more frequently modulating inhibitory and dopaminergic input to the NAc and MOR primarily modulating NAc GABAergic neurons themselves (Svingos et al, 1999; Svingos et al, 1997; Wang et al, 1998).
Cocaine-primed reinstatement of cocaine seeking requires glutamatergic neurotransmission in the NAc core (Cornish and Kalivas, 2000; McFarland et al, 2003) and dopaminergic neurotransmission in the NAc shell (Anderson et al, 2003), although direct dopamine receptor stimulation in the medial NAc core elicits greater cocaine seeking than the shell or lateral core region (Bachtell et al, 2005, Schmidt et al, 2006). While we did not compare core with shell subregions in this study, the ability of the MOR antagonist CTAP to block cocaine-primed cocaine seeking suggests that β-endorphin is released in the vicinity of the medial NAc. Given that the locomotor activating effects of intra-NAc MOR- and DOR-selective agonists are not attenuated by dopamine depletion or chronic dopamine receptor blockade (Stinus et al, 1986; Churchill and Kalivas, 1992), it is likely that cocaine seeking elicited by MOR and DOR stimulation is mediated independent of dopamine release in the NAc. Furthermore, dopamine depletion leads to supersensitivity to MOR but not DOR agonist infusions in locomotor tests (Churchill and Kalivas, 1992).
Chronic cocaine administration modulates opioid receptor expression in the NAc (for review see (Boutrel, 2008; Kreek, 2001), suggesting that changes in these receptors could alter the propensity for relapse during cocaine withdrawal. Free β-endorphin levels are decreased in the NAc and other brain regions within 1 day withdrawal from cocaine self-administration, potentially reflecting depletion of endogenous stores (Sweep et al, 1989). Similarly, opioid receptor binding decreases immediately after and prior to the next scheduled cocaine self-administration session (Gerrits et al, 1999), possibly reflecting the release of endogenous opioids during cocaine self-administration. Chronic cocaine administered in a daily binge pattern transiently increases MOR but not DOR density and MOR-stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding in the NAc (Schroeder et al, 2003; Unterwald et al, 1992). However, the ability of DOR, but not MOR, stimulation to inhibit adenylyl cyclase activity is impaired in the NAc following chronic cocaine (Unterwald et al, 1993), and this impairment persists for at least 1 day of cocaine withdrawal (Perrine et al, 2008), coinciding with increased internalization of DOR in NAc neurons (Ambrose-Lanci et al, 2008). While these changes could modify the ability of MOR and DOR to trigger cocaine relapse in early cocaine withdrawal, we reported that MOR, and not DOR, levels in the NAc core progressively increase from 1 to 6 weeks of withdrawal from chronic cocaine self-administration (Self et al, 2004), and the effect is accompanied by increases in the precursor for β-endorphin, pro-opiomelanocortin, in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus (Smagula et al, 2005). These findings suggest that progressive increases in MOR signaling in the NAc contribute to time-dependent increases in cocaine seeking behavior in cocaine withdrawal when animals are exposed to cocaine-paired environments or stressful conditions (Grimm et al, 2001; Sorge and Stewart, 2005; Tran-Nguyen et al, 1998).
Human studies also support a relationship between increased MOR and cocaine craving in abstinence. Thus, MOR binding measured by positron emission tomography is increased in striatal and cortical regions in abstinent cocaine addicts and positively correlates with measures of cocaine craving (Gorelick et al, 2005; Zubieta et al, 1996). In subsequent studies, the up-regulation in MOR binding was found to persist for up to 12 weeks of abstinence and positively correlate with the amount of prior cocaine use (Gorelick et al, 2005). Moreover, the up-regulation of MOR in abstinence served as an independent predictor of time to relapse in cocaine addicts, and positively correlated with amount of cocaine use during the first month of relapse (Gorelick et al, 2008). While limitations in detection precluded examination of MOR exclusively in the NAc, our animal data suggest that such long-lasting increases in MOR could functionally increase the propensity for cocaine relapse (Self et al, 2004).
In this regard, treatment with the opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone in combination with behavioral therapy decreased cocaine use over time (Schmitz et al, 2001). When 3-fold higher doses of naltrexone were utilized in combination with psychosocial treatment, the severity of cocaine use decreased (Pettinati et al, 2008). In response to an acute cocaine dose, addicts reported decreased “good effects” and “crash” when treated with naltrexone (Kosten et al, 1992; Sofuoglu et al, 2003), although naltrexone reportedly does not decrease subjective reports of craving elicited by cocaine-associated cues (Modesto-Lowe et al, 1997). Our findings suggest that blockade of MOR and DOR in the NAc contribute to the therapeutic potential of naltrexone in the treatment of cocaine addiction.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported NIH grants DA 10460, DA 18743, DA 08227 and DA 19274 (D. Simmons), and by the Wesley Gilliland Professorship in Biomedical Research (UTSW). The authors thank Chul Ahn, Ph.D. and Song Zhang, Ph.D. in the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics at UT Southwestern Medical Center for statistical support. Special gratitude to Erin Larson, PhD., Nicole Buzin, Paul Nederhoed, and Joey Webb with animal support.
Footnotes
Disclosure/Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that over the past three years, D. Self has received compensation from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, and D. Simmons has received no financial support from any individual or corporate entity. There are no personal financial holdings that could be perceived as constituting a potential conflict of interest.
  • Anderson SM, Bari AA, Pierce RC. Administration of the D1-like dopamine receptor antagonist SCH-23390 into the medial nucleus accumbens shell attenuates cocaine priming-induced reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior in rats. Psychopharmacology. 2003;168:132–8. [PubMed]
  • Ambrose-Lanci LM, Peiris NB, Unterwald EM, Van Bockstaele EJ. Cocaine withdrawal-induced trafficking of delta-opioid receptors in rat nucleus accumbens. Brain Res. 2008;1210:92–102. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Arroyo M, Baker WA, Everitt BJ. Cocaine self-administration in rats differentially alters mRNA levels of the monoamine transporters and striatal neuropeptides. Mol Brain Res. 2000;83:107–120. [PubMed]
  • Bachtell RK, Whisler K, Karanian D, Self DW. Effects of intra-nucleus accumbens shell administration of dopamine agonists and antagonists on cocaine-taking and cocaine-seeking behaviors in the rat. Psychopharmacology. 2005;183:41–53. [PubMed]
  • Bakshi VP, Kelley AE. Feeding induced by opioid stimulation of the ventral striatum: role of opiate receptor subtypes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993;265:1253–1260. [PubMed]
  • Bonner G, Meng F, Akil H. Selectivity of mu-opioid receptor determined by interfacial residues near third extracellular loop. Eur J Pharmacol. 2000;403:37–44. [PubMed]
  • Boutrel B. A neuropeptide-centric view of psychostimulant addiction. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;154:343–357. [PubMed]
  • Burattini C, Burbassi S, Aicardi G, Cervo L. Effects of naltrexone on cocaine- and sucrose-seeking behaviour in response to associated stimuli in rats. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008;11:103–109. [PubMed]
  • Churchill L, Kalivas PW. Dopamine depletion produces augmented behavioral responses to a mu-, but not a delta-opioid receptor agonist in the nucleus accumbens: lack of a role for receptor upregulation. Synapse. 1992;11:47–57. [PubMed]
  • Clayson J, Jales A, Tyacke RJ, Hudson AL, Nutt DJ, Lewis JW, et al. Selective delta-opioid receptor ligands: potential PET ligands based on naltrindole. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2001;11:939–943. [PubMed]
  • Comer SD, Lac ST, Curtis LK, Carroll ME. Effects of buprenorphine and naltrexone on reinstatement of cocaine-reinforced responding in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993;267:1470–1477. [PubMed]
  • Cornish JL, Kalivas PW. Glutamate transmission in the nucleus accumbens mediates relapse in cocaine addiction. J Neurosci. 2000;20:RC89. [PubMed]
  • Cunningham ST, Kelley AE. Opiate infusion into nucleus accumbens: contrasting effects on motor activity and responding for conditioned reward. Brain Res. 1992;588:104–114. [PubMed]
  • Dackis CA, O’Brien CP. Cocaine dependence: a disease of the brain’s reward centers. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2001;21:111–117. [PubMed]
  • de Vries TJ, Babovic-Vuksanovic D, Elmer G, Shippenberg TS. Lack of involvement of delta-opioid receptors in mediating the rewarding effects of cocaine. Psychopharmacology. 1995;120:442–448. [PubMed]
  • Doron R, Fridman L, Yadid G. Dopamine-2 receptors in the arcuate nucleus modulate cocaine-seeking behavior. Neuroreport. 2006;17:1633–1636. [PubMed]
  • Edwards S, Whisler KN, Fuller DC, Orsulak PJ, Self DW. Addiction-related alterations in D1 and D2 dopamine receptor behavioral responses following chronic cocaine self-administration. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007;32:354–366. [PubMed]
  • Ford CP, Mark GP, Williams JT. Properties and opioid inhibition of mesolimbic dopamine neurons vary according to target location. J Neurosci. 2006;26:2788–2797. [PubMed]
  • Furuta T, Zhou L, Kaneko T. Preprodynorphin-, preproenkephalin-, preprotachykinin A-and preprotachykinin B-immunoreactive neurons in the accumbens nucleus and olfactory tubercle: double-immunofluorescence analysis. Neuroscience. 2002;114:611–627. [PubMed]
  • Gerrits MA, Kuzmin AV, van Ree JM. Reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in rats is attenuated following repeated treatment with the opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005;15:297–303. [PubMed]
  • Gerrits MA, Wiegant VM, Van Ree JM. Endogenous opioids implicated in the dynamics of experimental drug addiction: an in vivo autoradiographic analysis. Neuroscience. 1999;89:1219–1227. [PubMed]
  • Gorelick DA, Kim YK, Bencherif B, Boyd SJ, Nelson R, Copersino M, et al. Imaging brain mu-opioid receptors in abstinent cocaine users: time course and relation to cocaine craving. Biol Psychiat. 2005;57:1573–1582. [PubMed]
  • Gorelick DA, Kim YK, Bencherif B, Boyd SJ, Nelson R, Copersino ML, et al. Brain mu-opioid receptor binding: relationship to relapse to cocaine use after monitored abstinence. Psychopharmacology. 2008;200:475–486. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gracy KN, Svingos AL, Pickel VM. Dual ultrastructural localization of mu-opioid receptors and NMDA-type glutamate receptors in the shell of the rat nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci. 1997;17:4839–4848. [PubMed]
  • Grimm JW, Hope BT, Wise RA, Shaham Y. Neuroadaptation. Incubation of cocaine craving after withdrawal. Nature. 2001;412:141–142. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hurd YL, Herkenham M. Influence of a single injection of cocaine, amphetamine or GBR 12909 on mRNA expression of striatal neuropeptides. Mol Brain Res. 1992;16:97–104. [PubMed]
  • Johnson SW, North RA. Two types of neurone in the rat ventral tegmental area and their synaptic inputs. J Physiol. 1992;450:455–468. [PubMed]
  • Kalivas PW, Bronson M. Mesolimbic dopamine lesions produce an augmented behavioral response to enkephalin. Neuropharmacology. 1985;24:931–936. [PubMed]
  • Kalivas PW, Volkow ND. The neural basis of addiction: a pathology of motivation and choice. Am J Psychiat. 2005;162:1403–1413. [PubMed]
  • Kelley AE, Baldo BA, Pratt WE, Will MJ. Corticostriatal-hypothalamic circuitry and food motivation: integration of energy, action and reward. Physiol Behav. 2005;86:773–795. [PubMed]
  • Koob GF, Le Moal M. Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;24:97–129. [PubMed]
  • Kosten T, Silverman DG, Fleming J, Kosten TA, Gawin FH, Compton M, et al. Intravenous cocaine challenges during naltrexone maintenance: a preliminary study. Biol Psychiat. 1992;32:543–548. [PubMed]
  • Kreek MJ. Drug addictions. Molecular and cellular endpoints. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;937:27–49. [PubMed]
  • Leone P, Pocock D, Wise RA. Morphine-dopamine interaction: ventral tegmental morphine increases nucleus accumbens dopamine release. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1991;39:469–472. [PubMed]
  • Mansour A, Fox CA, Burke S, Akil H, Watson SJ. Immunohistochemical localization of the cloned mu opioid receptor in the rat CNS. J Chem Neuroanat. 1995;8:283–305. [PubMed]
  • Mansour A, Khachaturian H, Lewis ME, Akil H, Watson SJ. Autoradiographic differentiation of mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors in the rat forebrain and midbrain. J Neurosci. 1987;7:2445–2464. [PubMed]
  • Mantsch JR, Yuferov V, Mathieu-Kia AM, Ho A, Kreek MJ. Effects of extended access to high versus low cocaine doses on self-administration, cocaine-induced reinstatement and brain mRNA levels in rats. Psychopharmacology. 2004;175:26–36. [PubMed]
  • Martin TJ, Kim SA, Cannon DG, Sizemore GM, Bian D, Porreca F, et al. Antagonism of delta(2)-opioid receptors by naltrindole-5′-isothiocyanate attenuates heroin self-administration but not antinociception in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000;294:975–982. [PubMed]
  • McFarland K, Lapish CC, Kalivas PW. Prefrontal glutamate release into the core of the nucleus accumbens mediates cocaine-induced reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior. J Neurosci. 2003;23:3531–3537. [PubMed]
  • Meyer ME, McLaurin BI, Allen M. Biphasic effects of intraaccumbens mu-opioid peptide agonist DAMGO on locomotor activities. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1994;47:827–831. [PubMed]
  • Modesto-Lowe V, Burleson JA, Hersh D, Bauer LO, Kranzler HR. Effects of naltrexone on cue-elicited craving for alcohol and cocaine. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997;49:9–16. [PubMed]
  • Olive MF, Koenig HN, Nannini MA, Hodge CW. Stimulation of endorphin neurotransmission in the nucleus accumbens by ethanol, cocaine, and amphetamine. J Neurosci. 2001;21:RC184. [PubMed]
  • Paxinos G, Watson C. The Rat Brain Stereotaxic Coordinates. 4. Academic Press; New York: 1998.
  • Pelton JT, Kazmierski W, Gulya K, Yamamura HI, Hruby VJ. Design and synthesis of conformationally constrained somatostatin analogues with high potency and specificity for mu opioid receptors. J Med Chem. 1986;29:2370–2375. [PubMed]
  • Perrine SA, Sheikh IS, Nwaneshiudu CA, Schroeder JA, Unterwald EM. Withdrawal from chronic administration of cocaine decreases delta opioid receptor signaling and increases anxiety- and depression-like behaviors in the rat. Neuropharmacology. 2008;54:355–364. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pettinati HM, Kampman KM, Lynch KG, Suh JJ, Dackis CA, Oslin DW, et al. Gender differences with high-dose naltrexone in patients with co-occurring cocaine and alcohol dependence. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008;34:378–390. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Phillips AG, LePiane FG, Fibiger HC. Dopaminergic mediation of reward produced by direct injection of enkephalin into the ventral tegmental area of the rat. Life Sci. 1983;33:2505–2511. [PubMed]
  • Phillips PE, Stuber GD, Heien ML, Wightman RM, Carelli RM. Subsecond dopamine release promotes cocaine seeking. Nature. 2003;422:614–618. [PubMed]
  • Portoghese PS, Sultana M, Takemori AE. Naltrindole, a highly selective and potent non-peptide delta opioid receptor antagonist. Eur J Pharmacol. 1988;146:185–186. [PubMed]
  • Portoghese PS, Sultana M, Takemori AE. Naltrindole 5′-isothiocyanate: a nonequilibrium, highly selective delta opioid receptor antagonist. J Med Chem. 1990;33:1547–1548. [PubMed]
  • Pruessner JC, Champagne F, Meaney MJ, Dagher A. Dopamine release in response to a psychological stress in humans and its relationship to early life maternal care: a positron emission tomography study using [11C] raclopride. J Neurosci. 2004;24:2825–2831. [PubMed]
  • Reid LD, Glick SD, Menkens KA, French ED, Bilsky EJ, Porreca F. Cocaine self-administration and naltrindole, a delta-selective opioid antagonist. Neuroreport. 1995;6:1409–1412. [PubMed]
  • Roth-Deri I, Schindler CJ, Yadid G. A critical role for beta-endorphin in cocaine-seeking behavior. Neuroreport. 2004;15:519–521. [PubMed]
  • Roth-Deri I, Zangen A, Aleli M, Goelman RG, Pelled G, Nakash R, et al. Effect of experimenter-delivered and self-administered cocaine on extracellular beta-endorphin levels in the nucleus accumbens. J Neurochem. 2003;84:930–938. [PubMed]
  • Schmidt HD, Anderson SM, Pierce RC. Stimulation of D1-like or D2 dopamine receptors in the shell, but not the core, of the nucleus accumbens reinstates cocaine-seeking behaviour in the rat. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;23:219–228. [PubMed]
  • Schmitz JM, Stotts AL, Rhoades HM, Grabowski J. Naltrexone and relapse prevention treatment for cocaine-dependent patients. Addict Behav. 2001;26:167–180. [PubMed]
  • Schroeder JA, Niculescu M, Unterwald EM. Cocaine alters mu but not delta or kappa opioid receptor-stimulated in situ [35S]GTPgammaS binding in rat brain. Synapse. 2003;47:26–32. [PubMed]
  • See RE, Elliott JC, Feltenstein MW. The role of dorsal vs ventral striatal pathways in cocaine-seeking behavior after prolonged abstinence in rats. Psychopharmacology. 2007;194:321–331. [PubMed]
  • Self DW, Choi KH, Simmons D, Walker JR, Smagula CS. Extinction training regulates neuroadaptive responses to withdrawal from chronic cocaine self-administration. Learn Mem. 2004;11:648–657. [PubMed]
  • Self DW, Nestler EJ. Relapse to drug seeking: neural and molecular mechanisms. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1998;51:49–60. [PubMed]
  • Shalev U, Grimm JW, Shaham Y. Neurobiology of relapse to heroin and cocaine seeking: a review. Pharmacol Rev. 2002;54:1–42. [PubMed]
  • Smagula CS, Simmons D, Monteggia L, Self DW. Increased expression of MOR1 mRNA in the anterior nucleus accumbens and POMC mRNA in the anterior arcuate nucleus following long-term withdrawal from cocaine self-administration. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 2005;31:682.14.
  • Soderman AR, Unterwald EM. Cocaine reward and hyperactivity in the rat: Sites of mu opioid receptor modulation. Neuroscience. 2008;154:1506–1516. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sofuoglu M, Singha A, Kosten TR, McCance-Katz FE, Petrakis I, Oliveto A. Effects of naltrexone and isradipine, alone or in combination, on cocaine responses in humans. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2003;75:801–808. [PubMed]
  • Sorge RE, Stewart J. The contribution of drug history and time since termination of drug taking to footshock stress-induced cocaine seeking in rats. Psychopharmacology. 2005;183:210–217. [PubMed]
  • Spealman RD, Barrett-Larimore RL, Rowlett JK, Platt DM, Khroyan TV. Pharmacological and environmental determinants of relapse to cocaine-seeking behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1999;64:327–336. [PubMed]
  • Stewart J. Reinstatement of heroin and cocaine self-administration behavior in the rat by intracerebral application of morphine in the ventral tegmental area. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1984;20:917–923. [PubMed]
  • Stewart J. Pathways to relapse: the neurobiology of drug- and stress-induced relapse to drug-taking. J Psychiat Neurosci. 2000;25:125–136. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Stewart J, Vezina P. A comparison of the effects of intra-accumbens injections of amphetamine and morphine on reinstatement of heroin intravenous self-administration behavior. Brain Res. 1988;457:287–294. [PubMed]
  • Stinus L, Nadaud D, Jauregui J, Kelley AE. Chronic treatment with five different neuroleptics elicits behavioral supersensitivity to opiate infusion into the nucleus accumbens. Biol Psychiatry. 1986;21:34–48. [PubMed]
  • Svingos AL, Clarke CL, Pickel VM. Localization of the delta-opioid receptor and dopamine transporter in the nucleus accumbens shell: implications for opiate and psychostimulant cross-sensitization. Synapse. 1999;34:1–10. [PubMed]
  • Svingos AL, Moriwaki A, Wang JB, Uhl GR, Pickel VM. mu-Opioid receptors are localized to extrasynaptic plasma membranes of GABAergic neurons and their targets in the rat nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci. 1997;17:2585–2594. [PubMed]
  • Sweep CG, Wiegant VM, De Vry J, Van Ree JM. Beta-endorphin in brain limbic structures as neurochemical correlate of psychic dependence on drugs. Life Sci. 1989;44:1133–1140. [PubMed]
  • Tang XC, McFarland K, Cagle S, Kalivas PW. Cocaine-induced reinstatement requires endogenous stimulation of mu-opioid receptors in the ventral pallidum. J Neurosci. 2005;25:4512–4520. [PubMed]
  • Tran-Nguyen LT, Fuchs RA, Coffey GP, Baker DA, O’Dell LE, Neisewander JL. Time-dependent changes in cocaine-seeking behavior and extracellular dopamine levels in the amygdala during cocaine withdrawal. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1998;19:48–59. [PubMed]
  • Unterwald EM, Cox BM, Kreek MJ, Cote TE, Izenwasser S. Chronic repeated cocaine administration alters basal and opioid-regulated adenylyl cyclase activity. Synapse. 1993;15:33–38. [PubMed]
  • Unterwald EM, Horne-King J, Kreek MJ. Chronic cocaine alters brain mu opioid receptors. Brain Res. 1992;584:314–318. [PubMed]
  • Van der Kooy D, Mucha RF, O’Shaughnessy M, Bucenieks P. Reinforcing effectss of brain microinjections of morphine revealed by conditioned place preference. Brain Res. 1982;243:107–117. [PubMed]
  • Wang H, Pickel VM. Dendritic spines containing mu-opioid receptors in rat striatal patches receive asymmetric synapses from prefrontal corticostriatal afferents. J Comp Neurol. 1998;396:223–237. [PubMed]
  • Ward SJ, Roberts DC. Microinjection of the delta-opioid receptor selective antagonist naltrindole 5′-isothiocyanate site specifically affects cocaine self-administration in rats responding under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. Behav Brain Res. 2007;182:140–144. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zangen A, Shalev U. Nucleus accumbens beta-endorphin levels are not elevated by brain stimulation reward but do increase with extinction. Eur J Neurosci. 2003;17:1067–1072. [PubMed]
  • Zhang M, Balmadrid C, Kelley AE. Nucleus accumbens opioid, GABaergic, and dopaminergic modulation of palatable food motivation: contrasting effects revealed by a progressive ratio study in the rat. Behav Neurosci. 2003;117:202–211. [PubMed]
  • Zhang M, Kelley AE. Opiate agonists microinjected into the nucleus accumbens enhance sucrose drinking in rats. Psychopharmacology. 1997;132:350–360. [PubMed]
  • Zubieta JK, Gorelick DA, Stauffer R, Ravert HT, Dannals RF, Frost JJ. Increased mu opioid receptor binding detected by PET in cocaine-dependent men is associated with cocaine craving. Nat Med. 1996;2:1225–1229. [PubMed]