1. Department of Health & Human Services. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (onc)-president's vision for health IThttp://www.hhs.gov/healthit/presvision.htmlAccessed December 2007.
2. The White House National Economic Council, Reforming Health Care for the 21st Centuryhttp://www.whitehouse.gov/stateoftheunion/2006/healthcare/healthcare_booklet.pdfAccessed December 2007.
3. Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Boberg EW, et al. CHESS: 10 years of research and development in consumer health informatics for broad populations, including the underservedIn: Lewis D, Jimison HB, Eysenbach G, Kukafka R, Stavri PZ, editors. Consumer Health Informatics: Informing Consumers and Improving Health Care. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2005. pp. 239-247.
4. Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health Wired for health and Well-Being: The emergence of interactive health communicationIn: Eng TR, Gustafson DH, editors. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Government Printing Office; 1999.
5. Slack W. CybermedicineSan Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1997.
6. Boberg EW, Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, et al. Development, acceptance, and use patterns of a computer-based education and social support system for people living with AIDS HIV infection Comput Hum Behav 1995;11(2):289-311.
7. Hellawell GO, Turner KJ, Le Monnier KJ, Brewster SF. Urology and the internet: An evaluation of Internet use by urology patients and of information available on urological topics BJU Int 2000;86(3):191-194. [PubMed] 8. Kaufman DR, Patel VL, Hilliman C, et al. Usability in the real world: Assessing medical information technologies in patients' homes J Biomed Inform 2003;36(1–2):45-60. [PubMed]
9. Lu HP, Gustafson DH. An empirical study of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on computerized support system use over time Int J Inf Manag 1994;14(5):317-329.
10. Strömberg A, Ahlén H, Fridlund B, Dahlström U. Interactive education on CD-ROM—A new tool in the education of heart failure patients Patient Educ Couns 2002;46(1):75-81. [PubMed] 11. Winkelman WJ, Leonard KJ, Rossos PG. Patient-perceived usefulness of online electronic medical records: Employing grounded theory in the development of information and communication technologies for use by patients living with chronic illness J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12(3):306-314. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 12. Maglaveras N, Koutkias V, Chouvarda I, et al. Home care delivery through the mobile telecommunications platform: The citizen health system (CHS) perspective Int J Med Inform 2002;68(1–3):99-111. [PubMed] 13. Brennan PF, Moore SM, Bjornsdottir G, et al. An internet-based information and support system for patient home recovery after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery J Adv Nurs 2001;35(5):699-708. [PubMed] 14. Kashem A, Droogan MT, Santamore WP, et al. Web-based Internet telemedicine management of patients with heart failure Telemed J E-Health 2006;12(4):439-447. [PubMed] 15. Gustafson DH, Hawkins R, Boberg E, et al. Impact of a patient-centered, computer-based health information/support system Am J Prev Med 1999;16(1):1-9. [PubMed] 16. Brennan PF, Ripich S, Moore SM. The use of home-based computers to support persons living with AIDS/ARC J Community Health Nurs 1991;8(1):3-14. [PubMed] 17. Brennan PF, Casper GR, Kossman S, Burke LJ. HeartCareII: Home care support for patients with chronic cardiac disease Medinfo 2007;129:988-992. [PubMed] 18. Strömberg A, Dahlström U, Fridlund B. Computer-based education for patients with chronic heart failure—A randomised, controlled, multicentre trial of the effects on knowledge, compliance and quality of life Patient Educ Couns Dec 2006;64(1–3):128-135. [PubMed] 19. Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A. Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of telemedicine J Telemed Telecare 2002;8:1-30. [PubMed] 20. Martinez A, Everss E, Rojo-Alvarez JL, Figal DP, Garcia-Alberola A. A systematic review of the literature on home monitoring for patients with heart failure J Telemed Telecare 2006;12(5):234-241. [PubMed] 21. Louis AA, Turner T, Gretton M, Baksh A, Cleland JGE. A systematic review of telemonitoring for the management of heart failure Eur J Heart Fail Oct 2003;5(5):583-590. [PubMed] 22. Jennett PA, Hall LA, Hailey D, et al. The socio-economic impact of telehealth: A systematic review J Telemed Telecare 2003;9(6):311-320. [PubMed]
23. Israel BA, Sherman SJ. Social support, control and the stress processIn: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer B, editors. Health Behavior and Health Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1990. pp. 187-215.
24. Anderson RM, Funnell MM, Butler PM, et al. Patient empowerment: Results of a randomized controlled trial Diab Care 1995;18(7):943-949. [PubMed]
25. Brennan PF, Safran C. Empowered consumersIn: Lewis D, Eysenbach G, Kukafka R, Stavri PZ, Jimison H, editors. Consumer Health Informatics: Informing Consumers and Improving Health Care. Springer; 2005. pp. 8-21.
26. DeFrances CJ, Lees K, Kozak J, Hall M, Pokras B. National Hospital discharge survey (NHDS) and national survey of ambulatory Surgery (NSAS), Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statisticshttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ppt/duc2006/nhdsnsas_15.ppt 2005. Accessed October 2007.
27. DeFrances CJ, Podgornik MN. National Hospital Discharge Survey. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics; Number 371. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2004.
28. Korniewicz D, El-Masri M. Challenges and Adverse events in the homeIn: Bogner MS, editor. Misadventures in Health Care. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004. pp. 145-165.
29. Mead N, Varnam R, Rogers A, Roland M. What predicts patients' interest in the Internet as a health resource in primary care in England? J Health Serv Res Policy 2003;8(1):33-39. [PubMed] 30. Stoop AP, Van't Riet A, Berg M. Using information technology for patient education: Realizing surplus value? Patient Educ Couns 2004;54(2):187-195. [PubMed] 31. Williams P, Nicholas D, Huntington P. Non use of health information kiosks examined in an information needs context Health Inf Libr J 2003;20(2):95-103. [PubMed] 32. Rogers A, Mead N. More than technology and access: Primary care patients' views on the use and non-use of health information in the Internet age Health Soc Care Community 2004;12(2):102-110. [PubMed] 33. Liddy C, Dusseault JJ, Dahrouge S, et al. Telehomecare for patients with multiple chronic illnesses: Pilot study Can Fam Physician 2008;54(1):58-65. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Patterson TL, Shaw WS, Masys DR. Improving health through computer self-help programs: Theory and practiceIn: Brennan PF, Schneider SJ, Tornquist E, editors. Information Networks for Community Health. New York: Springer; 1997. pp. 219-246.
35. Jimison H, Gorman P, Woods S, et al. Barriers and Drivers of health information technology use for the elderly, chronically ill, and underservedEvid Rep/Technol Assess;175 (Prepared by the Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290–02-0024). AHRQ Publication No. 09-E004Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; November2008.
36. Karsh B. Beyond usability: Designing effective technology implementation systems to promote patient safety Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13(5):388-394. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology MIS Q 1989;13(3):319.
38. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view MIS Q 2003;27(3):425-478.
39. Whitten PS, Richardson JD. A scientific approach to the assessment of telemedicine acceptance J Telemed Telecare 2002;8(4):246-248. [PubMed]
40. Chau PYK, Hu PJ. Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: An exploratory study J Manag Inf Syst 2002;18(4):191-229.
41. Karsh B, Holden RJ. New technology implementation in health careIn: Carayon P, editor. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care and Patient Safety. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007. pp. 393-410.
42. Holden RJ, Karsh B. A theoretical model of health information technology usage behaviour with implications for patient safety Behav Inf Technol 2007:1-17.
43. Lorenzi NM, Riley RT, Blyth AJC, Southon G, Dixon BJ. Antecedents of the people and organizational aspects of medical informatics: Review of the literature J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997;4(2):79-93. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Damanpour F. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators Acad Manag J 1991;34(3):555-590.
45. Hamoui N, Lake J, Beart RW, Anthone GJ, Crookes PF. Patterns of Internet use: Bariatric versus colorectal patients in a private institution J Am Coll Surg 2004;199(2):223-228. [PubMed] 46. Kalichman SC, Cherry C, Cain D, et al. Internet-based health information consumer skills intervention for people living with HIV/AIDS J Consult Clin Psych 2006;74(3):545-554. [PubMed] 47. Pereira JL, Koski S, Hanson J, Bruera ED, Mackey JR. Internet usage among women with breast cancer: An exploratory study Clin Breast Cancer 2000;1(2):148-153. [PubMed] 48. Murero M, D'Ancona G, Karamanoukian H. Use of the Internet by patients before and after cardiac surgery: An interdisciplinary telephone survey J Med Internet Res 2001;3(3):e27. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Millard RW, Fintak PA. Use of the Internet by patients with chronic illness Dis Manag Health Outcomes 2002;10(3):187-194.
50. Metz JM, Devine P, DeNittis A, et al. A multi-institutional study of Internet utilization by radiation oncology patients Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 2003;56(4):1201-1205. [PubMed] 51. Schatell D, Wise M, Klicko K, Becker BN. In-center hemodialysis patients' use of the Internet in the United States: A national survey Am J Kidney Dis 2006;48(2):285-291. [PubMed] 52. Mancini J, Nogues C, Adenis C, et al. Patients' characteristics and rate of Internet use to obtain cancer information J Pub Health 2006;28(3):235-237. [PubMed] 53. Gordon MM, Capell HA, Madhok R. The use of the Internet as a resource for health information among patients attending a rheumatology clinic Rheumatology 2002;41(12):1402-1405. [PubMed] 54. Smith RP, Devine P, Jones H, et al. Internet use by patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy Urology 2003;62(2):273-277. [PubMed] 55. O'Connor JB, Johanson JF. Use of the Web for medical information by a gastroenterology clinic population J Am Med Assoc 2000;284(15):1962-1964. [PubMed] 56. Aydin U, Ozturk M, Kirbiyik S. Prevalence of Internet usage and access to health information among dental school outpatients Telemed J E-Health 2004;10(4):444-448. [PubMed] 57. Helft PR, Eckles RE, Johnson-Calley CS, Daugherty CK. Use of the internet to obtain cancer information among cancer patients at an urban county hospital J Clin Oncol 2005;23(22):4954-4962. [PubMed] 58. Tak SH, Hong SH. Use of the internet for health information by older adults with arthritis Orthop Nurs 2005;24(2):134-138. [PubMed] 59. Salo D, Perez C, Lavery R, et al. Patient education and the Internet: Do patients want us to provide them with medical web sites to learn more about their medical problems? J Emerg Med 2004;26(3):293-300. [PubMed] 60. Fogel J, Albert SM, Schnabel F, Ditkoff BA, Neugut AI. Use of the Internet by women with breast cancer J Med Internet Res 2002;4(2):e9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 61. Smith-Barbaro PA, Licciardone JC, Clarke HF, Coleridge ST. Factors associated with intended use of a Web site among family practice patients J Med Internet Res 2001;3(2):e17. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 62. Tassone P, Georgalas C, Patel NN, Appleby E, Kotecha B. Do otolaryngology out-patients use the internet prior to attending their appointment? J Laryngol Otol 2004;118(1):34-38. [PubMed] 63. Diaz JA, Griffith RA, Reinert SE, Friedmann PD, Moulton AW. Patients' use of the Internet for medical information J Gen Intern Med 2002;17(3):180-185. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 64. Lake JP, Ortega A, Vukasin P, et al. Internet use by colorectal surgery patients: A surgeon's tool for education and marketing Am Surg 2004;70(6):553-558. [PubMed] 65. Sabel MS, Strecher VJ, Schwartz JL, et al. Patterns of Internet use and impact on patients with melanoma J Am Acad Dermatology 2005;52(5):779-785. [PubMed] 66. Peterson MW, Fretz PC. Patient use of the internet for information in a lung cancer clinic Chest 2003;123(2):452-457. [PubMed] 67. Jeannot JG, Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, et al. Patient use of the Internet for health care information in Switzerland Swiss Med Wkly 2004;134(21–22):307-312. [PubMed] 68. Birkmann C, Dumitru RC, Prokosch HU. Evaluation of health-related Internet use in Germany Methods Inf Med 2006;45(4):367-376. [PubMed] 69. Dickerson S, Reinhart AM, Feeley TH, et al. Patient Internet use for health information at three urban primary care clinics J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11(6):499-504. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 70. Pautler SE, Tan JK, Dugas GR, et al. Use of the internet for self-education by patients with prostate cancer Urology 2001;57(2):230-233. [PubMed] 71. Wolf JM, Ritter M, Weiss AP, Akelman E. Access and use of the internet in a hand surgery population Hand Surg 2004;9(1):29-33. [PubMed] 72. Proude EM, Shourie S, Conigrave KM, et al. Do elective surgery patients use the internet to look for information about their condition? ANZ J Surg 2004;74(5):304-307. [PubMed] 73. Christian SM, Kieffer SA, Leonard NJ. Medical genetics and patient use of the Internet Clin Genet 2001;60(3):232-236. [PubMed] 74. Larner AJ. Searching the Internet for medical information: Frequency over time and by age and gender in an outpatient population in the UK J Telemed Telecare 2006;12(4):186-188. [PubMed] 75. Wong BM, Yung BM, Wong A, Chow CM, Abramson BL. Increasing Internet use among cardiovascular patients: New opportunities for heart health promotion Can J Cardiol 2005;21(4):349-354. [PubMed] 76. Cima RR, Anderson KJ, Larson DW, et al. Internet use by patients in an inflammatory bowel disease specialty clinic Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007;13(10):1266-1270. [PubMed] 77. Khazaal Y, Chatton A, Cochand S, et al. Internet use by patients with psychiatric disorders in search for general and medical informations Psychiatr Q 2008;79(4):301-309. [PubMed] 78. Tian Y, Robinson JD. Incidental health information use and media complementarity: A comparison of senior and non-senior cancer patients Patient Educ Couns 2008;71(3):340-344. [PubMed] 79. Williams TL, May CR, Esmail A, et al. Patient satisfaction with teledermatology is related to perceived quality of life Br J Dermatol 2001;145(6):911-917. [PubMed] 80. Eikelboom RH, Atlas, MD. Attitude to telemedicine, and willingness to use it, in audiology patients J Telemed Telecare 2005;11:22-25. [PubMed] 81. Chae YM, Lee JH, Ho SH, et al. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine in home health services for the elderly Int J Med Inform 2001;61(2–3):167-173. [PubMed] 82. Chae YM, Park HJ, Cho JG, Hong GD, Cheon K. The reliability and acceptability of telemedicine for patients with schizophrenia in Korea J Telemed Telecare 2000;6(2):83-90. [PubMed]
83. Gustke SS, Balch DC, West VL, Rogers LO. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine Telemed J 2000;6(1):5-13.
84. Mekhjian H, Turner JW, Gailiun M, McCain TA. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine in a prison environment J Telemed Telecare 1999;5(1):55-61. [PubMed] 85. Dugaw JE, Civello K, Chuinard C, Jones GN. Will patients use a computer to give a medical history? J Fam Pract 2000;49(10):921-923. [PubMed] 86. Lober WB, Zierler B, Herbaugh A, et al. Barriers to the use of a personal health record by an elderly populationPaper presented at Annual Symposium of American Medical Informatics Association 2006. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 87. Wilson EV, Lankton NK. Modeling patients' acceptance of provider-delivered e-health J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11(4):241-248. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 88. Fung V, Ortiz E, Huang J, et al. Early experiences with e-health services (1999–2002): Promise, reality, and implications Med Care 2006;44(5):491-496. [PubMed] 89. Carrell D, Ralston JD. Variation in adoption rates of a patient web portal with a shared medical record by age, gender, and morbidity levelPaper presented at Annual Symposium of American Medical Informatics Association 2006. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 90. Finkelstein J, Khare R, Ansell J. Feasibility and patients' acceptance of home automated telemanagement of oral anticoagulation therapyPaper presented at Annual Symposium of American Medical Informatics Association 2003. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 91. Lai TY, Larson EL, Rockoff ML, Bakken S. User acceptance of HIV tides–tailored interventions for management of depressive symptoms in persons living with HIV/AIDS J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15(2):217-226. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
92. Klein R. Internet-based patient–physician electronic communication applications: Patient acceptance and trust E-Service Journal 2007;5(2):27-51.
93. Siva C, Smarr KL, Hanson KD, et al. Internet use and e-mail communications between patients and providers: A survey of rheumatology outpatients JCR. J Clin Rheumatol 2008;14(6):318-323. [PubMed]
94. Or CKL, Karsh B. The patient technology acceptance model (PTAM) for homecare patients with chronic illnessPaper presented at Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting 2006.
95. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies Manag Sci 2000;46(2):186-204.
96. Brown SA, Massey AP, Montoya-Weiss MM, Burkman JR, Do I. Really have to?. User acceptance of mandated technology. Eur J Inf Syst 2002;11(4):283-295.
97. Howard GS, Smith RD. Computer anxiety in management: Myth or reality Commun ACM 1986;29(7):611-615.
98. Czaja SJ, Sharit J. Age differences in attitudes toward computers J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1998;53(5):329-340. [PubMed]
99. Morris MG, Venkatesh V. Age differences in technology adoption decisions: Implications for a changing workforce Pers Psych 2000;53(2):375-403.
100. Parasuraman S, Igbaria M. An examination of gender differences in the determinants of computer anxiety and attitudes toward microcomputers among managers Int J Man Machine Stud 1990;32(3):327-340.
101. Compeau DR, Higgins CA. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test MIS Q 1995;19(2):189-211.
102. Taylor S, Todd PA. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models Inf Syst Res 1995;6(2):144-176.
103. Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior Inf Syst Res 1991;2(3):173-191.
104. Gilroy FD, Desai HB. Computer anxiety: Sex, race, and age Int J Man Machine Stud 1986;25(6):711-719.
105. Igbaria M, Chakrabarti A. Computer anxiety and attitudes towards microcomputer use Behav Inf Technol 1990;9(3):229-241.
106. Venkatesh V, Morris MG. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions?. Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Q 2000;24(1):115-139.
107. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Ackerman PL. A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes Organ Behav Hum Decis Proc 2000;83(1):33-60. [PubMed]
108. Hu PJ, Chau PYK, Sheng ORL, Tam KY. Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology J Manag Inf Syst Fal 1999;16(2):91-112.
109. Compeau DR, Higgins CA, Huff S. Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study MIS Q 1999;23(2):145-158.
110. Igbaria M, Iivari J. Effects of self-efficacy on computer usage Omega 1995;23(6):587-605.
111. Hsu MH, Chiu CM. Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance Decis Support Syst 2004;38(3):369-381.
112. Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model Inf Syst Res 2000;11(4):342-365.
113. Simonson MR, Maurer M, Montagtorardi M, Whitaker M. Development of a standardized test of computer literacy and a computer anxiety index J Educ Comput Res 1987;3(2):231-247.
114. Elasmar MG, Carter ME. Use of e-mail by college students and implications for curriculum Journalism Mass Commun Educ 1996;51(2):46-54.
115. Ellis RD, Allaire JC. Modeling computer interest in older adults: The role of age, education, computer knowledge, and computer anxiety Hum Factors September 1999;41(3):345-355. [PubMed]
116. Song J, Zahedi FM. Trust in health infomediaries Decis Support Syst 2007;43(2):390-407.
117. Merritt SM, Ilgen DR. Not all trust is created equal: Dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions Hum Factors April2008;50(2):194-210. [PubMed]
118. Dzindolet MT, Peterson SA, Pomranky RA, Pierce LG, Beck HP. The role of trust in automation reliance Int J Hum Comput Stud June2003;58(6):697-718.
119. Lee JD, See KA. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance Hum Factors 2004;46(1):50-80. [PubMed]
120. Li X, Hess TJ, Valacich JS. Why do we trust new technology?. A study of initial trust formation with organizational information systems. J Strateg Inf Syst March2008;17(1):39-71.
121. Lippert SK, Davis M. A conceptual model integrating trust into planned change activities to enhance technology adoption behavior J Inf Sci 2006;32(5):434-448.
122. Madhavan P, Wiegmann DA, Lacson FC. Automation failures on tasks easily performed by operators undermine trust in automated aids Hum Factors 2006;48(2):241-256. [PubMed]
123. Novelli L, Kirkman BL, Shapiro DL. Effective implementation of organizational change: An organizational justice perspectiveIn: Cooper CL, Rousseau DM, editors. Trends in Organizational Behavior. . Vol 2. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1995. pp. 15-36.
124. Karsh B, Holden RJ. New technology implementation in health careIn: Carayon P, editor. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care and Patient Safety. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2006. pp. 393-410.
125. Ives B, Olson MH. User involvement and MIS success: A review of research Manag Sci 1984;30(5):586-603.
126. Igbaria M, Guimaraes T, Davis GB. Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model J Manag Inf Syst 1995;11(4):87-114.
127. Cobb AT, Wooten KC, Folger R. Justice in the making: toward understanding the theory and practice of justice in organizational change and developmentIn: Pasmore WA, Woodman RW, editors. Research in Organizational Change and Development. . Vol 8. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1995. pp. 243-295.
128. Sanders MS, McCormick EJ. Human Factors in Engineering and Design7th edn. NY: McGraw-Hill; 1993.
129. Stanney KM, Smith MJ, Carayon P, Salvendy G. Human-computer interactionIn: Salvendy G, editor. Handbook of Industrial Engineering: Technology and Operations Management. 3rd edn. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 2001. pp. 1192-1236.
130. Thompson RL, Higgins CA, Howell JM. Personal computing: toward a conceptual-model of utilization MIS Q 1991;15(1):125-143.
131. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior Organ Behav Hum Decis Proc 1991;50(2):179-211.
132. Moore GC, Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation Inf Syst Res 1991;2(3):192-222.
133. Yi MY, Jackson JD, Park JS, Probst JC. Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: toward an integrative view Inf Manag 2006;43(3):350-363.
134. Chen CC, Wu J, Crandall RE. Obstacles to the adoption of radio frequency identification technology in the emergency rooms of hospitals Int J Electron Healthc 2007;3(2):193-207. [PubMed] 135. Hu PJ, Chau PY. Physician acceptance of telemedicine technology: An empirical investigation Top Health Inf Manag 1999;19(4):20-35. [PubMed] 136. Duyck P, Pynoo B, Devolder P, et al. User acceptance of a picture archiving and communication system. Applying the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology in a radiological setting. Methods Inf Med 2008;47(2):149-156. [PubMed]
137. Korunka C, Weiss A, Zauchner S. An interview study of “continuous” implementations of information technology Behav Inf Technol 1997;16(1):3-16.
138. Moen A, Brennan PF. Health@Home: The work of health information management in the household (HIMH): Implications for consumer health informatics (CHI) innovations J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12(6):648-656. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
139. James LR, Brett JM. Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation J Appl Psych 1984;69(2):307-321.
140. Goodhue DL, Thompson RL. Task-technology fit and individual performance MIS Q 1995;19(2):213-236.
141. Rahimpour M, Lovell NH, Celler BG, McCormick J. Patients' perceptions of a home telecare system Int J Med Inform July2008;77(7):486-498. [PubMed]
142. Steinmark AP, Dornelas EA, Fischer EH. Determinants and barriers to participation in an internet based recovery program for cardiac patients J Clin Psych Med Settings December2006;13(4):353-357.
143. Kobb R, Chumbler NR, Brennan DM, Rabinowitz T. Home telehealth: Mainstreaming what we do well Telemed J E-Health 2008;14(9):977-981. [PubMed]
144. Czaja SJ, Lee CC. The internet and older adults: Design challenges and opportunitiesIn: Charness N, Park DC, Sabel BA, editors. Communication, Technology and Aging: Opportunities and Challenges for the Future. New York: Springer, Publishing, Co; 2001. pp. 60-81.
145. Laursen B, Jensen BR, Ratkevicius A. Performance and muscle activity during computer mouse tasks in young and elderly adults Eur J Appl Physiol 2001;84(4):329-336. [PubMed]
146. Rogers WA, Badre AN. The Web user. part 2. Older adults. In: Badre AN, editor. Shaping Web Usability: Interaction Design in Context. Boston: Addison-Wesley; 2002. pp. 91-108.
147. Smith MW, Sharit J, Czaja SJ. Aging, motor control, and the performance of computer mouse tasks Hum Factors 1999;41(3):389-396. [PubMed] 148. Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, et al. Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (create) Psych Aging 2006;21(2):333-352. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 149. Evangelista LS, Strömberg A, Westlake C, et al. Developing a web-based education and counseling program for heart failure patients Prog Cardiovascular Nurs 2006;21(4):196-201. [PubMed]
150. Fisk AD, Rogers WA. Health care of older adults: The promise of human factors researchIn: Rogers WA, Fisk AD, editors. Human Factors Interventions for the Health Care of Older Adults. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2001. pp. 1-12.
151. Rogers WA, Meyer B, Walker N, Fisk AD. Functional limitations to daily living tasks in the aged: A focus group analysis Hum Factors Mar 1998;40(1):111-125. [PubMed] 152. Eysenbach G. The impact of the internet on cancer outcomes CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53(6):356-371. [PubMed] 153. Friedman RH, Kazis LE, Jette A, et al. A telecommunications system for monitoring and counseling patients with hypertension. Impact on medication adherence and blood pressure control. Am J Hypertens 1996;9(4):285-292. [PubMed] 154. Leirer VO, Morrow DG, Tanke ED, Pariante GM. Elders' nonadherence: Its assessment and medication reminding by voice mail Gerontologist 1991;31(4):514-520. [PubMed] 155. Karsh B, Holden RJ, Alper SJ, Or CKL. A human factors engineering paradigm for patient safety: Designing to support the performance of the healthcare professional Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:I59-I65. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 156. Or CKL, Valdez R, Casper G, et al. Human factors and ergonomics in home care: Current concerns and future considerations for health information technology Work: J Prev, Assess Rehab 2009. accepted for publication. [PMC free article] [PubMed]