There is still little information available on the regulation of or environmental conditions influencing GEI transfer. In fact, for most GEIs it was initially assumed that transfer would be ‘spontaneous’ or ‘constitutive’. However, it has been suggested that in a number of cases, tightly regulated events underlay the onset of GEI self-mobilization (
Jain et al., 2003). This is not so surprising, especially given the high level of control on the life-style of temperate bacteriophages. A better understanding of the conditions for self-transfer, the factors augmenting or decreasing transfer rates, and the (self-)regulation of the onset of the transfer process is of great importance, both for our appreciation of the impact of horizontal gene transfer on the evolution of microorganisms and for the practical purpose of judging the potential distribution of transgenes or antibiotic resistance genes in natural microbial populations (
Nielsen & Townsend, 2004). Evidence from the few GEI models studied so far suggests indeed quite the opposite of ‘spontaneous’ behaviour: a variety of regulatory modes and signals, which determine GEI self-transfer.
One of the most striking regulatory modes for GEI behaviour was revealed from studies on the tetracycline determinants in
Bacteroides. Conjugative transfer of the ICEs CTn
DOT and CTn
ERL from
Bacteroides is stimulated up to 10 000-fold when cells are grown in the presence of tetracycline. This effect was found to be the result of an induction of two regulatory genes,
rteA and
rteB, both of which stimulate transcription of a third factor
rteC, which influences excision of the element (
Cheng et al., 2001;
Whittle et al., 2002). From the work on ICE
clc of
Pseudomonas sp. strain B13, we know that ICE
clc transfer is strongly enhanced in the stationary phase in a bistable fashion (e.g. only
c. 5% of all cells engage in transfer). Transfer of ICE
clc correlates to an increase of expression from the
intB13 integrase gene, which is stimulated by the product of the gene
inrR (
Sentchilo et al., 2003a). Upon excision and formation of a circular intermediate, a strong promoter – otherwise located at the other end of ICE
clc facing outwards – is placed in front of the
intB13 gene favouring the reintegration process (
Sentchilo et al., 2003a). Transfer of the 108-kb GEI called PAPI-1, which was discovered in
P. aeruginosa strain PA14 and is similar to the element pKLC102, proceeds via excision, formation of an intermediate circular form and reintegration into either of the two
tRNALys genes in
P. aeruginosa (PA4541 and PA0976) (
Qiu et al., 2006). The authors of this work could demonstrate that a
soj gene encoded by PAPI-1 itself was required for the maintenance of the element, both in integrated and in circular form (
Qiu et al., 2006). Their hypothesis was that Soj protects the circular form of PAPI-1 either directly from degradation or indirectly by promoting the integration of the circular form back into the chromosome. The major evidence for this was the finding that
soj is expressed by the circular form at early stationary phase. The Soj protein is related to the ParA family of proteins, which are responsible for correct segregation of low-copy plasmids during cell division.
Transfer regulation proceeds differently in the SXT element of
V. cholerae. Excision of SXT is favoured by an excisionase Xis (
Burrus & Waldor, 2003), which, however, also inhibits its integration. In SXT,
xis and
int are convergent genes that do not appear to be coregulated. SXT transfer is strongly enhanced under stress conditions and is dependent on the SOS response (
Beaber et al., 2004). Interestingly, the
V. cholerae SOS response is eluded in particular by two antibiotics, ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim, for which the SXT element encodes resistance determinants. The mechanism is thought to proceed as follows: in the presence of an SOS stimulus, the SXT-encoded repressor SetR is cleaved, resulting in the expression of two SXT-encoded genes
setC and
setD, which are activators for the
int and
tra genes of the element (
Burrus & Waldor, 2003). Also excision of ICE
Bs1, a mobile element found in the genome of
B. subtilis, is stimulated by global DNA damage in addition to an intercellular peptide signaling. This behaviour was found to be dependent on the factor ImmR, which regulates expression of a number of ICE
Bs1 genes and is responsible for immunity to superinfection (
Auchtung et al., 2007).
Excision of the ICE
MISymR7A symbiosis island of
M. loti strain R7A is also stimulated by a novel recombination directionality factor (RDF) called RdfS, which is encoded by the gene
msi109 (
Ramsay et al., 2006). Transfer of the ICE
MISymR7A also requires a putative relaxase, RlxS. The genes
rdfS and
rlxS are part of the same cluster of which two other genes are homologues to the conjugative protein TraF (
Ramsay et al., 2006). Similar to the
clc element, also the excised form of ICE
MISymR7A was more abundant in stationary than exponential phase of
M. loti, and experimental evidence suggested that this excision was under quorum-sensing control (
Ramsay et al., 2006).
Another example for excisionase requirement is the integrase of the HPI, which cannot alone promote efficiently the excision of HPI. In this case, it was demonstrated that a factor called Hef RDF, which is encoded by HPI, is required for excision (
Lesic et al., 2004). Although the level of
hef expression severely affected the rate of HPI excision, it had little or no effect on
int transcription, and the authors concluded that Hef could not act as transcriptional regulator. Another RDF called Rox (for regulator of excision) was shown to stimulate excision of the
Shigella resistance locus PAI in
Shigella flexneri (
Luck et al., 2004). Similarly to Hef, this Rox protein is not an activator of
int transcription, although it showed 66% sequence similarity to AlpA from the phage CP4-57. AlpA is a transcription factor for the
int gene of the phage CP4-57 in
E. coli K-12, regulating the excision of the prophage from the bacterial chromosome (
Trempy et al., 1994). The examples described above suggest that GEI transfer can be a highly regulated process with a variety of developed regulatory modes.
As discussed below, GEIs play an important role in bacterial genome evolution in general and in adaptation to changing conditions, in clinical, industrial or natural environments. The outcome of these adaptations is obvious from the development of antibiotic resistance, pathogenicity or catabolic functions. Thus, it would be extremely interesting to find specific features, which make GEIs so successful in self-transfer, host-entry or establishment in a host. Are GEIs considered parasites by a new host? Do GEIs have the means to trick a host and avoid its defence systems? Are all GEIs alike in this respect or do exceptions exist? Relatively little information is available concerning these questions and the nature of GEI–host interactions in general.
Most of the information on the host–DNA invader interactions comes from conjugative plasmids and phages. In general, the frequency of successful DNA exchange between bacteria belonging to different genera will depend on many factors: the degree of homology between the transferred DNA and the bacterial host, the metabolic compatibility, adaptations to their abiotic environment, gene expression systems, gene-transfer mechanisms, the mismatch repair and restriction endonuclease systems. For example, the transfer efficiency of the broad-host range IncP-1 plasmid RK2, as measured by the number of transfer events per donor present, was dramatically influenced by the nature of the donor–recipient combination: between
E. coli strains or from
E. coli to
P. putida, RK2 transfer was much less frequent than between
P. putida strains. This was attributed to species-specific differences in RK2 gene expression (
Bingle & Thomas, 2001). The recipient cell can also limit the entry or establishment of the incoming DNA by surface exclusion, a process by which a barrier seems to be created by cells that already carry the genes for a closely related transfer apparatus (
Frost et al., 1994). Horizontally acquired DNA that confers a selective advantage to the host obviously has the potential to spread further among suitable recipients within a bacterial population under the appropriate selective conditions (
Thomas & Nielsen, 2005).
Upon successful transfer, the newly incoming DNA must still be maintained to ensure its long-term survival in the new host. If there is a clear selective advantage conferred by the acquired DNA for the host, and no major fitness cost under nonselective conditions, it is less likely that the horizontally acquired DNA will be lost. Incoming DNA on a plasmid must be able to replicate independently but synchronously the host's chromosomal replication and cell division. This process is usually guaranteed by a plasmid-specific system, such as killing daughter cells without partitioned plasmids. In the absence of appropriate replication, plasmids may still ‘survive’ by recombining into the host's chromosome, which is promoted by the presence of suitable sequences for homologous recombination. On the other hand, GEIs depend on site-specific reintegration into an appropriate chromosomal target site, in the absence of which the element is unlikely to be maintained. However, once integrated, a GEI will be automatically maintained by chromosomal replication. Loss can occur when the GEI excises, as there seems to be a strong advantage for growth of cells without GEIs. Such a scenario was demonstrated recently in a study on the UPEC
E. coli isolate 536, which contains five PAIs, some of which can become deleted during chronic infection. The authors could show that the integrase of one of the PAIs could actually mediate the excision of another PAI. This suggests the existence of unidirectional cross-talk between integrases of different PAIs (
Hochhut et al., 2006). Similar cross-talk phenomena had been detailed previously by work on the
Bacteroides element NBU1, which can be coexcised and mobilized by the conjugative transposon CTnERL (
Shoemaker et al., 2000).
Although it is generally stated that GEIs give a selective advantage to the host cell (
Dobrindt et al., 2004), this has not been extensively experimentally tested yet. In fact, results from conjugative plasmids would suggest the opposite, namely that cells which acquire a conjugative plasmid, go through a period of fitness loss (
Dahlberg & Chao, 2003). This fitness loss can be caused by particular functions carried on the plasmid which are detrimental upon expression in the new host (e.g. regulatory proteins interfering with the global gene expression network), or by proteins expressed from plasmid which have a direct phenotypic effect (e.g. antibiotic resistance) (
Nguyen et al., 1989). Bacterial populations having received a newly incoming plasmid were shown to adapt to their previous fitness by spontaneous mutations which reduce or repress the plasmid specific effects (
Dahlberg & Chao, 2003). Plasmids with both very low to unmeasurable cost, and very large cost to the host were detected and their ability to persist in a bacterial population was shown to be influenced by the host strain background (
De Gelder et al., 2007;
Schluter et al., 2007). Very recently, it was demonstrated that ICE
clc had only a very minor effect on the fitness of host
P. aeruginosa strains (
Gaillard et al., 2008). Although so far only a single case of this has been found, it might point to this type of ICE/GEI having specific mechanisms to reduce fitness cost in the host (
Gaillard et al., 2008).
There is increasing evidence that GEI expression is globally influenced by the host in which it resides. Thus, GEIs usually constitute part of global regulatory networks and genes on the particular GEI can be regulated by regulators present on the same GEI, by regulators harboured by other GEIs or by regulators encoded by the host bacterium. Similarly, GEI-borne regulators often play a role in the regulation of genes on the bacterial chromosome.
Regulators frequently contributing to regulation of GEIs comprise the two-component response regulator family, AraC family, alternative sigma factors and histone-like proteins. Paradigmal regulatory networks involving intensive cross-talk between GEI-borne regulators and gene components of the host genome include
Salmonella pathogenicity islands (SPI-1 and SPI-2) of
S. enterica, Vibrio pathogenicity island (VPI) of
V. cholerae and the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) of
E. coli and have been reviewed elsewhere (
Hacker & Kaper, 2000;
Schmidt & Hensel, 2004).
Recent studies into the regulatory role of the histone-like nucleoid-structuring protein (H-NS) have shed a new light into the regulation of some bacterial GEIs. H-NS is a pleiotropic regulator that modulates gene expression of gram-negative bacteria in response to environmental stimuli, such as temperature and osmolarity (
Hommais et al., 2001). H-NS represents the bacterial functional equivalent of histones, plays an important role in a local supercoiling of DNA, and has higher affinity for curved DNA (
Navarre et al., 2006). Work from several laboratories exploiting recent DNA microarray technology has shown that H-NS plays a key role in the selective silencing of horizontally acquired genes (
Lucchini et al., 2006;
Navarre et al., 2006). Expression of >400 genes was shown to be upregulated in the
Salmonella hns mutant, out of which more than 90% were acquired by the horizontal gene transfer (
Navarre et al., 2006). The GC content of most of the H-NS repressed genes was lower than the average GC content of the host
Salmonella genome, thus leading to the conclusion that H-NS can selectively silence horizontally acquired genes by targeting sequences with proportionally high AT content (
Navarre et al., 2006). Recently, conserved sequence motifs have been identified that represent the high-affinity DNA-binding sites for H-NS (
Lang et al., 2007). In accordance with previously published studies, these motifs occur in AT-rich regions of DNA both within operons and in genes harboured by the pathogenicity-associated GEIs (
Lang et al., 2007). As described above, the differences in the nucleotide statistics are among the characteristic features of GEIs, thus targeting sequences with different GC content by H-NS represents an elegant and efficient mechanism of regulation of newly acquired GEIs.