PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Int Immunopharmacol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 May 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2701472
NIHMSID: NIHMS96259

Chromatin remodeling complex in Treg function

Abstract

Regulatory T cells (Treg), formerly known as suppressor T cells, are essential for maintaining self-tolerance as well as immune homeostasis. Lack of Treg or normal function of Treg often leads to lymphoproliferative syndrome and autoimmunity in human and mouse. The chromatin remodeling BAF complex regulates gene expression through the activity of Brg. Genetic ablation of Brg gene in mouse resulted in early embryonic lethality. T cell failed to develop in the thymus when Brg is deleted at DN stage. Using a Brg conditional KO mouse model, we deleted Brg at the DP stage in the thymus. Unexpectedly, T cells developed and matured normally. However, these mice displayed lympho-proliferative syndrome 2–4 months of age with enlarged peripheral lymphoid organs and leukocyte infiltration in non-lymphoid organs. T cells from these mice turned into effector cells producing increased amounts of effector cytokines as early as 4 weeks after birth. Further analysis revealed that the Treg population was specifically affected by Brg deletion. In this mini-review, we will discuss in detail the properties of Tregs controlled by Brg and the potential underlying mechanisms for an unanticipated, specific role of the Brg-containing BAF complex in controlling Treg functions.

Treg, its function and regulation

In 1995, a subset of T cells that actively suppressed immune responses were identified [1]. These cells, later referred to as regulatory T cells (Treg), are critical for maintaining self-tolerance and controlling immune responses. Defective Treg function invariably leads to autoimmunity or inflammatory diseases in human and mouse [25].

Based on the expression profiles of cell surface molecules and/or cytokines, several types of Tregs have been categorized [2]. Among them, naturally occurring Treg (nTreg) is the best characterized and studied. nTreg is a subset of CD4 T cells that develop in the thymus and constitutively express high levels of IL-2 receptor α chain (CD25) on the cell surface. nTregs comprise approximately 10% of peripheral CD4 T cells in mice and humans. In the absence of functional nTregs, systemic autoimmune syndrome develops in IPEX patients and Scurfy mice, underscoring the critical function of nTreg in self-tolerance [3,4]. A set of cell surface molecules besides CD25, such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor family related gene (GITR) and lymphocyte activation antigen-3 (LAG-3) have also been used to differentiate nTreg from conventional T cells [2]. TGF-β and IL-10, potent immune suppressive cytokines, are highly expressed in Tregs [610]. Although these genes are constitutively expressed at high levels in nTreg, they are also highly expressed in conventional T cells under certain conditions. In addition, although these genes contribute to the function of Tregs, none of them appears to be specifically involved in the generation and function of Treg cells. It was not until early 2000 that Foxp3, an X-linked transcription factor belonging to the fork-head family, was found to be specifically and highly expressed in nTregs [1115]. More importantly, single gene inactivation of Foxp3 accounts for the loss of functional Treg cells and the development of IPEX in human patients and the Scurfy phenotype in mice [11,12]. In addition, forced expression of Foxp3 in non-Treg T cells endows suppressive activities [16,17]. Thus, a high level of Foxp3 now serves as a surrogate marker for functional Treg cells. Multiple reporter mouse strains have been developed to mark Foxp3 expressing cells [1820], fueling our intense efforts of understanding how Treg function is controlled.

The existence of adequate numbers of functional Treg cells is essential for self-tolerance and immune homeostasis. Thus, perturbation of the generation, maintenance and the function of Tregs often lead to over-exuberant immune responses and immune pathology. High level expression of CTLA-4 and IL-10 contribute to the suppressive function of Treg without affecting its generation or maintenance [21]. On the other hand, IL-2 and its signaling components promote and PDE3B inhibits the peripheral maintenance but not the function of Treg cells [22,23]. TGF-β however regulates both the function and maintenance of Treg cells [24]. Therefore, it appears that multiple genes and signaling pathways are involved in the regulation of Treg maintenance as well as function. Substantial efforts are being devoted to unravel the mechanisms on how different aspects of Treg physiology are regulated. The hunt for genes that specifically regulate Treg function is warranted. Such studies are not only essential for the understanding of Treg function, but also for elucidating the etiology of human immune diseases, such as autoimmunity and cancer, and for devising effective therapies to treat these illnesses.

Chromatin remodeling and its function in T cells

In eukaryotes, genomic DNA associates with the nuclear protein complex known as chromatin. The basic repeating unit of chromatin is the “nucleosome core particle” where a histone octamer, consisting of 8 histone molecules of 4 types (two each of H2A, H2B, H3 and H4), grips and sequesters a 146-bp DNA segment. An array of linked nucleosome particles can be progressively coiled up into condensed fibers, effectively “burying” DNA. Such a structure on one hand protects DNA from harmful exposure to the myriads of proteins and enzymes in the nucleus. On the other hand, it prevents nuclear factors to access genes to regulate their expression.

To reconfigure chromatin, cells often mobilize “chromatin remodeling complexes” (CRC) that use energy to disrupt histone-DNA contacts. CRC are powerful molecular motors that use mechanical force derived from ATP hydrolysis to disrupt histone-DNA contacts, exposing nucleosomal DNA. Multiple classes of CRC have been isolated in eukaryotic cells, each of which contains a related ATPase as the motor subunit. The best-defined mammalian CRC is the “BAF complex”, a 10 subunit complex. Two ATPase subunits, Brg (Brahma-related gene) and Brm (Brahma) are found in mammalian cells to assemble into alternative BAF complexes [25,26] (hence the name Brg/Brm Associated Factor or BAF complex) [27]. The expression patterns of Brg and Brm are distinct: Brg is constitutively and ubiquitously expressed throughout development, while Brm is expressed predominantly in mature, differentiated cells [28,29]. The function of Brg and Brm are similar and yet divergent [2832]. To regulate gene expression, CRCs often associates with Histone Acetyl Transferases (HATs) [33], histone methylase [34], or Histone Deacetylases (HDAC) [3537]. BAF complexes can be transiently recruited to and remodel a promoter to mediate gene induction in response to signaling, but can also constitutively remodel a promoter to poise it for rapid induction in anticipation of signaling.

Over the past few years, genetic and biochemical approaches have been used to address the roles of BAF complex in the immune system. T cell-specific inactivation of Brg containing BAF complex indicates that they are essential for thymocyte developmental transitions, and that they contribute to CD4/CD8 lineage bifurcation by directly repressing CD4 while activating CD8 expression [29,32,38]. A role of Brg in VDJ recombination has been proposed based on the fact that Brg stimulates recombination on chromatin templates in vitro, and that Brg is selectively bound to the TCR loci open for recombination [3943]. Brg is also critical for innate and adaptive immune responses [4446]. Thus, in the immune system, BAF complex possesses quite diverse functions to regulate different cell types.

Brg function during late T cell development and in mature T cells

We have been interested in studying the roles of BAF complex in the function and gene regulation in different compartments of T cells. The failure of T cell generation in LckCre Brgflox/− mice, where the Brg gene was deleted during the DN stage of thymocyte development [29], prevented us from studying its role in mature T cells. In hope of circumventing this, we crossed CD4Cre transgenic mice with Brgflox/− mice to obtain CD4Cre- Brgflox/− mice; thus Brg is deleted in DP thymocytes and later. Normal thymocyte development was observed when Brg is deleted in the DP stage (our unpublished results). As comforting as it is, this result is surprising in that our previous study demonstrated that Brg is essential for DN thymocyte survival as well as developmental progression [29], indicating a role for Brg in controlling T cell survival and proliferation. This intriguing result provides evidence to support the notion that Brg function is intricately regulated during T cell development; Brg is essential for specific but not all stages of T cell development. Despite the largely normal T cell development in these mice, we observed lymphadenomegaly and splenomegaly with increased lymphocyte counts in older mice. In addition, T cells from these mice gained activated phenotype. One of the possible causes of such a phenotype could be defective Treg function. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed and compared the numbers of Foxp3+ Treg cells in the periphery between Brg deficient and WT mice, and no substantial difference was observed. In vitro, the suppression activities of BrgKO appeared to be normal. In addition, the expression of Treg “signature” genes was also normal. However, in vivo, BrgKO Treg cells did not protect naïve T cell elicited colitis in Rag1−/− mice. This was because Brg deficient Treg cells failed to be maintained in the periphery after transfer. However, conventional T cells lacking the Brg gene were maintained normally in the periphery. These results suggest a specific role for Brg in promoting Treg maintenance in vivo. Bone marrow chimera mice, where WT and Brg−/− T cells coexisted in the same physiological environment, were also created. In accordance with our previous results, lower percentage of Treg cells were detected from Brg−/− CD4 T cells compared to those detected from WT cells. Oligo-array assays were performed to identify genes specifically dependent on Brg in Treg cells. Less than 50 genes were significantly affected by Brg deletion. Among them, genes involved in cell survival, metabolism and TGF-β signaling were identified. Therefore, these new findings demonstrated an unexpected, specific role for Brg in controlling Foxp3+ Treg peripheral maintenance likely through promoting its survival.

How one CRC specifically regulates gene expression in a cell type and context dependent manner is an important question and warrants further investigation. Revelation of the specific roles of CRC in different cell types will surely enhance the understanding of gene regulation mechanisms and its relevance for normal physiological functions.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Sakaguchi S, Sakaguchi N, Asano M, Itoh M, Toda M. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor alpha-chains (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J Immunol. 1995;155:1151–64. [PubMed]
2. Sakaguchi S. Naturally arising CD4+ regulatory t cells for immunologic self-tolerance and negative control of immune responses. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;22:531–62. [PubMed]
3. Sakaguchi S. Naturally arising Foxp3-expressing CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells in immunological tolerance to self and non-self. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:345–52. [PubMed]
4. Shevach EM. Regulatory T cells in autoimmmunity*. Annu Rev Immunol. 2000;18:423–49. [PubMed]
5. Shevach EM. CD4+ CD25+ suppressor T cells: more questions than answers. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:389–400. [PubMed]
6. Green EA, Gorelik L, McGregor CM, Tran EH, Flavell RA. CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells control anti-islet CD8+ T cells through TGF-beta-TGF-beta receptor interactions in type 1 diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:10878–83. [PubMed]
7. Nakamura K, Kitani A, Strober W. Cell contact-dependent immunosuppression by CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells is mediated by cell surface-bound transforming growth factor beta. J Exp Med. 2001;194:629–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Dieckmann D, Plottner H, Berchtold S, Berger T, Schuler G. Ex vivo isolation and characterization of CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells with regulatory properties from human blood. J Exp Med. 2001;193:1303–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Papiernik M, do Carmo Leite-de-Moraes M, Pontoux C, Joret AM, Rocha B, Penit C, et al. T cell deletion induced by chronic infection with mouse mammary tumor virus spares a CD25-positive, IL-10-producing T cell population with infectious capacity. J Immunol. 1997;158:4642–53. [PubMed]
10. Stephens LA, Mottet C, Mason D, Powrie F. Human CD4(+)CD25(+) thymocytes and peripheral T cells have immune suppressive activity in vitro. Eur J Immunol. 2001;31:1247–54. [PubMed]
11. Bennett CL, Christie J, Ramsdell F, Brunkow ME, Ferguson PJ, Whitesell L, et al. The immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome (IPEX) is caused by mutations of FOXP3. Nat Genet. 2001;27:20–1. [PubMed]
12. Brunkow ME, Jeffery EW, Hjerrild KA, Paeper B, Clark LB, Yasayko SA, et al. Disruption of a new forkhead/winged-helix protein, scurfin, results in the fatal lymphoproliferative disorder of the scurfy mouse. Nat Genet. 2001;27:68–73. [PubMed]
13. Fontenot JD, Gavin MA, Rudensky AY. Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:330–6. [PubMed]
14. Hori S, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science. 2003;299:1057–61. [PubMed]
15. Wildin RS, Ramsdell F, Peake J, Faravelli F, Casanova JL, Buist N, et al. X-linked neonatal diabetes mellitus, enteropathy and endocrinopathy syndrome is the human equivalent of mouse scurfy. Nat Genet. 2001;27:18–20. [PubMed]
16. Khattri R, Kasprowicz D, Cox T, Mortrud M, Appleby MW, Brunkow ME, et al. The amount of scurfin protein determines peripheral T cell number and responsiveness. J Immunol. 2001;167:6312–20. [PubMed]
17. Kasprowicz DJ, Smallwood PS, Tyznik AJ, Ziegler SF. Scurfin (FoxP3) controls T-dependent immune responses in vivo through regulation of CD4+ T cell effector function. J Immunol. 2003;171:1216–23. [PubMed]
18. Fontenot JD, Rasmussen JP, Williams LM, Dooley JL, Farr AG, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cell lineage specification by the forkhead transcription factor foxp3. Immunity. 2005;22:329–41. [PubMed]
19. Wan YY, Flavell RA. Identifying Foxp3-expressing suppressor T cells with a bicistronic reporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:5126–31. [PubMed]
20. Bettelli E, Carrier Y, Gao W, Korn T, Strom TB, Oukka M, et al. Reciprocal developmental pathways for the generation of pathogenic effector TH17 and regulatory T cells. Nature. 2006;441:235–8. [PubMed]
21. Powrie F, Read S, Mottet C, Uhlig H, Maloy K. Control of immune pathology by regulatory T cells. Novartis Found Symp. 2003;252:92–8. discussion 98–105, 106–14. [PubMed]
22. Fontenot JD, Rasmussen JP, Gavin MA, Rudensky AY. A function for interleukin 2 in Foxp3-expressing regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:1142–51. [PubMed]
23. Gavin MA, Rasmussen JP, Fontenot JD, Vasta V, Manganiello VC, Beavo JA, et al. Foxp3-dependent programme of regulatory T-cell differentiation. Nature. 2007;445:771–5. [PubMed]
24. Li MO, Wan YY, Sanjabi S, Robertson AK, Flavell RA. Transforming Growth Factor-beta Regulation of Immune Responses. Annu Rev Immunol 2005 [PubMed]
25. Khavari PA, Peterson CL, Tamkun JW, Mendel DB, Crabtree GR. BRG1 contains a conserved domain of the SWI2/SNF2 family necessary for normal mitotic growth and transcription. Nature. 1993;366:170–4. [PubMed]
26. Muchardt C, Yaniv M. A human homologue of Saccharomyces cerevisiae SNF2/SWI2 and Drosophila brm genes potentiates transcriptional activation by the glucocorticoid receptor. Embo J. 1993;12:4279–90. [PubMed]
27. Wang W, Cote J, Xue Y, Zhou S, Khavari PA, Biggar SR, et al. Purification and biochemical heterogeneity of the mammalian SWI-SNF complex. Embo J. 1996;15:5370–82. [PubMed]
28. Bultman S, Gebuhr T, Yee D, La Mantia C, Nicholson J, Gilliam A, et al. A Brg1 null mutation in the mouse reveals functional differences among mammalian SWI/SNF complexes. Mol Cell. 2000;6:1287–95. [PubMed]
29. Chi TH, Wan M, Lee PP, Akashi K, Metzger D, Chambon P, et al. Sequential roles of Brg, the ATPase subunit of BAF chromatin remodeling complexes, in thymocyte development. Immunity. 2003;19:169–82. [PubMed]
30. Strobeck MW, Reisman DN, Gunawardena RW, Betz BL, Angus SP, Knudsen KE, et al. Compensation of BRG-1 function by Brm: insight into the role of the core SWI-SNF subunits in retinoblastoma tumor suppressor signaling. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:4782–9. [PubMed]
31. Reyes JC, Barra J, Muchardt C, Camus A, Babinet C, Yaniv M. Altered control of cellular proliferation in the absence of mammalian brahma (SNF2alpha) Embo J. 1998;17:6979–91. [PubMed]
32. Gebuhr TC, Kovalev GI, Bultman S, Godfrey V, Su L, Magnuson T. The role of Brg1, a catalytic subunit of mammalian chromatin-remodeling complexes, in T cell development. J Exp Med. 2003;198:1937–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Narlikar GJ, Fan HY, Kingston RE. Cooperation between complexes that regulate chromatin structure and transcription. Cell. 2002;108:475–87. [PubMed]
34. Xu W, Cho H, Kadam S, Banayo EM, Anderson S, Yates JR, 3rd, et al. A methylation-mediator complex in hormone signaling. Genes Dev. 2004;18:144–56. [PubMed]
35. Tong JK, Hassig CA, Schnitzler GR, Kingston RE, Schreiber SL. Chromatin deacetylation by an ATP-dependent nucleosome remodelling complex. Nature. 1998;395:917–21. [PubMed]
36. Xue Y, Wong J, Moreno GT, Young MK, Cote J, Wang W. NURD, a novel complex with both ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling and histone deacetylase activities. Mol Cell. 1998;2:851–61. [PubMed]
37. Zhang Y, LeRoy G, Seelig HP, Lane WS, Reinberg D. The dermatomyositis-specific autoantigen Mi2 is a component of a complex containing histone deacetylase and nucleosome remodeling activities. Cell. 1998;95:279–89. [PubMed]
38. Chi TH, Wan M, Zhao K, Taniuchi I, Chen L, Littman DR, et al. Reciprocal regulation of CD4/CD8 expression by SWI/SNF-like BAF complexes. Nature. 2002;418:195–9. [PubMed]
39. Morshead KB, Ciccone DN, Taverna SD, Allis CD, Oettinger MA. Antigen receptor loci poised for V(D)J rearrangement are broadly associated with BRG1 and flanked by peaks of histone H3 dimethylated at lysine 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:11577–82. [PubMed]
40. Kwon J, Morshead KB, Guyon JR, Kingston RE, Oettinger MA. Histone acetylation and hSWI/SNF remodeling act in concert to stimulate V(D)J cleavage of nucleosomal DNA. Mol Cell. 2000;6:1037–48. [PubMed]
41. Patenge N, Elkin SK, Oettinger MA. ATP-dependent remodeling by SWI/SNF and ISWI proteins stimulates V(D)J cleavage of 5 S arrays. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:35360–7. [PubMed]
42. Golding A, Chandler S, Ballestar E, Wolffe AP, Schlissel MS. Nucleosome structure completely inhibits in vitro cleavage by the V(D)J recombinase. Embo J. 1999;18:3712–23. [PubMed]
43. Spicuglia S, Kumar S, Yeh JH, Vachez E, Chasson L, Gorbatch S, et al. Promoter activation by enhancer-dependent and -independent loading of activator and coactivator complexes. Mol Cell. 2002;10:1479–87. [PubMed]
44. Pattenden SG, Klose R, Karaskov E, Bremner R. Interferon-gamma-induced chromatin remodeling at the CIITA locus is BRG1 dependent. Embo J. 2002;21:1978–86. [PubMed]
45. Goodbourn S, Didcock L, Randall RE. Interferons: cell signalling, immune modulation, antiviral response and virus countermeasures. J Gen Virol. 2000;81:2341–64. [PubMed]
46. Mudhasani R, Fontes JD. The class II transactivator requires brahma-related gene 1 to activate transcription of major histocompatibility complex class II genes. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:5019–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed]