PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 April 24.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2696126
NIHMSID: NIHMS110931

Mouse CD4+ CD25+ T regulatory cells are protected from autologous complement mediated injury by Crry and CD59

Abstract

Self cells depend on surface complement regulators to protect them from autologous complement-mediated attack. CD4+CD25+foxp3+ T regulatory (Treg) cells are critical in maintaining immune homeostasis, however, which complement regulators are expressed on them and how they are protected from autologous complement attack remains unknown. We report here that mouse Treg cells express virtually no DAF or CR1. Instead, all of them express Crry and approximately half of them express CD59. Both Crry-/- and CD59-/- Treg cells exhibit greater complement mediated injury than WT Treg cells. These results clarify the status of cell surface complement regulators on mouse Treg cells and indicate that both Crry and CD59 are required to protect Treg cells from autologous complement-mediated injury. Additionally, these data also argue that different from previous assumption, at least in mice, CD4+CD25+foxp3+ Treg cells are not homogenous and could be further divided into subgroups based on CD59 expression.

Keywords: complement, complement regulators, Treg cells, foxp3, mouse

Introduction

As a pivotal part of the innate immunity, complement exists at high concentration in serum as well as in many other body fluids to fight against infections [1]. When activated, complement activation products (e.g. C3b) opsonize their targets to enable efficient phagocytosis through interactions with complement receptors on phagocytic cells [2]. At the same time, the terminal pathway of complement activation assembles membrane attack complexes (MAC), which lyses target cells by forming osmotic channels on cell surfaces [3]. Since complement activation products cannot distinguish self cells from invading pathogens, self cells depend on surface complement regulators to protect them from autologous complement mediated injury. Among known cell surface complement inhibitors, there are decay accelerating factor (DAF, CD55) [4], membrane cofactor protein (MCP, CD46) [5], complement receptor 1(CR1, CD35) [6] and CD59 [7]. Given their physiological importance, all the cells express at least one, most times all the above complement regulators on their surfaces [8]. These cell surface complement inhibitors regulate complement activation at different steps therefore protect self cells from complement mediated injury [8].

Different from humans, mice express a unique cell surface complement inhibitor named complement receptor 1-related protein y (Crry) which possesses the same decay accelerating activity of DAF and cofactor activity of MCP in humans [9]. Since mouse MCP expression is strictly limited in testis [10] and DAF expression is widely distributed [11], Crry is considered the human MCP counterpart in mice. Crry-/- mice are embryonic lethal because uncontrolled complement activation attacks fetus during gestation [12]. This problem can be solved by breeding Crry-/- mice onto the C3 deficient background in which the resulted Crry-/- C3-/- mice are vital and fertile [12].

CD4+CD25+foxp3+ Treg cells are a subgroup of CD4+ T cells that modulate T cell activity either through direct interactions with effector T cells and antigen presenting cells (APCs) or through production of immunosuppressive soluble factors such as IL-10 and TGF-β. They are under extensive study for their potentials in treating autoimmune diseases [13] as well as transplanted grafts rejection [14]. In theory, Treg cells need cell surface complement regulators to protect them from unwanted complement mediated attack, however, which cell surface complement inhibitors are expressed on Treg cells and how important these regulators are remain unstudied. Here we report the first time that mouse CD4+CD25+ foxp3+ Tregs express Crry and CD59 but not DAF or CR1 on their cell surfaces. By comparing Treg cells isolated from respective WT, Crry-/- C3-/- [12] and CD59-/- mice [15], we show that both Crry and CD59 are required in protecting Treg cells from complement mediated attack. Our results also suggest that CD4+CD25+ foxp3+ Treg cells are not homogenous and foxp3 could regulate CR1 and DAF expression on Treg cells.

Materials and methods

Mice and reagents

6-8 weeks old female C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Jackson Lab (Bar Harbor, ME). CD59a-/- mice [15] were kindly provided by Dr. BP Morgan and Crry-/- C3-/- mice [12] were kindly provided by Dr. H Monila. Mouse CD4+ T cell Easysep kits were purchased from Stem Cells Inc (Vancouver, Canada). Mouse Treg cell staining kits were purchased from eBiosciences (San Deigo, CA). Rat anti mouse CD59 mAb (clone ER-MP20) was ordered from AbCam Inc (Cambridge, MA), rat anti CR1 (clone 8C12) and rat anti Crry mAb (clone 1F2) were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). Rat anti mouse DAF mAb (clone 2C6) [16] was provided by Dr. BP Morgan.

Mouse CD4+T cell and CD4+ CD25+ T cell isolation

Mouse CD4+ T cells were isolated from spleens and lymph nodes using mouse CD4+ T cell Easyprep kits following the manufacturer’s protocol. The purity of the isolated CD4+ T cells was monitored by flow cytometry. To purify CD4+CD25+ T cells, CD4+ T cells were first enriched using the above described kit, then stained with FITC labeled anti CD4 and APC labeled anti CD25. After washing, CD4+CD25+ T cells were flow sorted by a BD Aria sorter.

Complement mediated cell injury assay

5-8 × 105 flow sorted CD4+CD25+ T cells first were incubated with 5 μM BCECF-AM (Invitrogen, CA) for 30 min at 37°C. After this, cells were washed three times with FACS buffer (1% BSA in PBS), then incubated at 37°C for 30 min with 10 μg/ml zymosan (Sigma, MO) and 30% mouse serum in 100 μl GVB-EGTA/Mg++ buffer (veronal-buffered saline supplemented with 0.1% gelatin, 5 mM EGTA and 3 mM MgCl2). Following incubation, complement mediated cell injury was assessed by measuring levels of converted BCECF released from the cell. In brief, supernatants were harvested and measured by a fluorescence microtiter plate reader (Molecular Devices, CA) with excitation and emission wavelengths of 485 nm and 538 nm. To calculate the percentage of BCECF release after complement mediated injury, the following equation was used as reported before [17, 18]: percentage of BCECF release = [(A-B)/(C-B)] × 100%; where A represents the mean experimental BCECF release, B represents the mean spontaneous BCECF release and C represents the mean maximum BCECF released which was induced by incubating cells with 0.1% Triton X -100.

Treg cells C3b deposition assay

1 × 106 isolated CD4+ T cells were incubated at 37°C for 20 min with 10 μg/ml zymosan and 30% mouse serum in 100 μl GVB-EGTA/Mg++ buffer. After this, cells were spinned down and washed with 500 μl of FACS buffer twice and then incubated with APC labeled anti-CD25 and FITC labeled anti-mouse C3 mAbs. After washing, cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (LSR I, BD Bioscience, CA) and gated on the CD4+CD25+ population.

Results

CD4+CD25+foxp3+ Treg cells express Crry and CD59 but not DAF or CR1

To detect cell surface complement regulators on CD4+CD25+foxp3+ Treg cells, we isolated CD4+ T cells from C57BL/6 mice and checked their purity by flow cytometry (> 98.5%, data not shown). After staining the isolated mouse CD4+ T cells with respective rat anti Crry, DAF, CD59 and CR1 mAbs and FITC conjugated goat anti rat IgG, we stained the cells again using APC conjugated anti CD25 mAb. Following fixation and permeabilization, we stained intracellular foxp3 by PE conjugated anti foxp3 mAb and analyzed the samples by flow cytometry (BD LSR I). These assays showed that while all CR1, DAF, CD59 and Crry were present on CD4+CD25+foxp3- T cells (Fig.1, upper left quarters), only Crry and CD59 were expressed by CD4+CD25+foxp3+ Treg cells (Fig.1, upper right quarters). Interestingly, CD59 was only present on approximately half of the CD4+CD25+foxp3+ Treg cells (Fig.1d)

Figure 1
Murine CD4+CD25+foxp3+ Treg cells express Crry and CD59 but not CR1 or DAF. Isolated CD4+ T cells (> 98.5% pure) were first stained for CR1 (a), DAF (b), Crry (c) and CD59 (d), then stained for CD25 and foxp3. After this, the samples were analyzed ...

Absence of Crry or CD59 leads to heightened complement mediated injury to Treg cells

To determine the importance of Crry and CD59 on Treg cells, we isolated Treg cells from WT, Crry-/- C3-/- and CD59-/- mice using magnetic beads negative selection followed by flow sorting. Because these knockout mice were not on the foxp3 GFP knockin background, we were only able to sort live CD4+CD25+ cells as Treg cells for experiments. After labeling the purified WT, CD59-/- and Crry-/- Treg cells with BCECF-AM, we incubated them with mouse serum and zymosan, which activated complement via the alternative pathway. After incubation, we quantitated complement mediated Treg cell injury by measuring levels of converted BCECF that was released from injured cells into the media. These assays (Fig. 2) showed that compared to WT Treg cells, Crry-/- and CD59-/- Treg cells had ~ 5 fold increased BCECF release into the media, which indicated ~ 5 fold more severe cell injury.

Figure 2
Both Crry and CD59 are required for efficient protection of Treg cells from autologous complement attack. Flow sorted Treg cells from WT, Crry-/- C3-/- and CD59-/- mice were first loaded with BCECF-AM, and then incubated with zymosan and serum at 37°C ...

Crry-/- Treg cells had greater C3b deposition on their cell surfaces than WT Tregs

To determine whether Crry-/- Treg cells exhibited changes in C3 convertase regulation, we compared deposited C3b levels on different Treg cells after incubation with zymosan activated complement. In brief, we repeated the above experiments and instead of measuring released BCECF levels, we quantitated C3b deposition on respective Treg cell surfaces by flow cytometry. The assays showed that compared to WT Treg cells, Crry-/- Treg cells had elevated levels of C3b deposition while CD59-/- Treg cells had similar C3b deposition on their cell surfaces (Fig. 3).

Figure 3
Crry-/- Treg cells have elevated levels of C3b deposition on their surfaces after bystand complement activation by zymosan

Discussion

In this report we provided demonstration the first time that mouse CD4+CD25+foxp3+ Treg cells expressed Crry and CD59 but not DAF or CR1. Crry-/- or CD59-/- Treg cells suffered more severe autologous complement mediated injury than WT Treg cells. While Crry-/- Treg cells had increased levels of C3b deposition on their surfaces, CD59-/- Treg cells had similar levels of C3b deposition as WT Treg cells which is consistent with CD59’s regulatory role on later MAC formation.

Complement cannot distinguish self cells from invaded pathogens because after activation, C3b binds covalently to any surface with free hydroxyl or amino groups [19]. As indicated in the Introduction, to protect self cells from autologous complement mediated attack, complement activation is tightly regulated by cell surface complement inhibitors, i.e. DAF, CR1, MCP and CD59. Both DAF and CR1 accelerate the decay of C3/C5 convertases [4, 20], while MCP only serves as a cofactor for factor I to convert the deposited C3b to its inactive form iC3b [5]. Although CD59 has no effect on C3/C5 convertases, it functions by inhibiting the insertion of C9 at the final step of MAC assembly, thus prevent MAC mediated cell injury/lysis [21]. The important roles of these cell surface complement regulators in protecting self cells against complement mediated injury are well documented in both human and animal studies e.g. DAF and CD59 deficient erythrocytes in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria patients are lysed by autologous complement activation and MAC formation, leading to hemoglobinuria and anemia [22]. MCP gene mutations predispose to development of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in which hemolytic anemia and kidney failure occur due to excessive complement activation [23]. DAF deficient mice develop elevated levels of proteinuria because of complement mediated renal injury in NTS- induced nephrtitis [24] and severe muscle weakness due to complement mediated endplates damage in passive experimental myasthenia gravis [25]. CD59 deficient mice develop spontaneous complement mediated intravascular hemolysis and hemoglobinuria [15] and Crry deficient mice are embryonic lethal due to placental destruction mediated by the maternal complement system [12].

The results that CR1 and DAF presented on CD4+CD25+foxp3- cells but not CD4+CD25+foxp3+ Treg cells argue that the transcription factor foxp3 inhibited the expression of CR1 and DAF in Treg cells. Although the underlying mechanism remains unknown and previous studies [26] have shown that foxp3 modulates expression of many genes associated with immunity including CTLA-4, CD25 and ICOS, to our knowledge this is the first evidence suggesting that foxp3 is associated with complement gene regulation.

The significance of DAF absence on CD4+CD25+foxp3+ Treg cells is unclear. Previous studies showed that during T cell activation, DAF expression is downregulated on activated T cells [27]. Our recent work also found that DAF is downregulated on both antigen presenting cells (APCs) and T cells during their cognate interactions to allow efficient T cell activation [28]. Another subset of lymphocytes that do not carry DAF on their surfaces are nature killer (NK) cells [29]. Incorporation of purified DAF protein on NK cells in vitro inhibits their cytotoxicity [30], suggesting that DAF may regulate NK cell function via a non-complement dependant mechanism. Further studies are needed to clarify whether overexpressing/incorporating DAF on Treg cells modulates their immunoregulatory function.

CD4+CD25+foxp3+ Treg cells are generally considered to be homogenous. Our results that approximately half of the Treg cells expressed CD59 while another half did not argue that they could be divided into at least 2 subgroups: the CD59+ Treg cells and the CD59- Treg cells. However, the physiological relevance of CD59 presence and absence on Treg cells requires further investigation.

Similar to other cells, Treg cells need cell surface complement regulators to protect them from autologous complement mediated attack. The studies reported here clarified the distribution of cell surface complement regulators on mouse Treg cells, showed that both Crry and CD59 are critical in protecting Treg cells from complement mediated injuries. These data also suggested that foxp3 could regulate CR1 and DAF expression in Treg cells, and at least in mice, CD4+CD25+foxp3+ Treg cells could be further divided into 2 subgroups based on their cell surface CD59 expression.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Edward Medof for discussion and Drs. B. P. Morgan and H. Monila for gene knockout mice and reagents. This work was supported by National Institute of Health grant NS052471 (FL) and National Multiple Sclerosis Society grant RG3664 (FL). Qing Li and Hong Bu were supported in part by Natural Science Foundation of China grant 30671988.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. The complement system. Springer; 1988.
2. Ehlenberger AG, Nussenzweig V. The role of membrane receptors for C3b and C3d in phagocytosis. J Exp Med. 1977;145:357–371. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Podack ER, Biesecker G, Muller-Eberhard HJ. Membrane attack complex of complement: generation of high-affinity phospholipid binding sites by fusion of five hydrophilic plasma proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76:897–901. [PubMed]
4. Medof ME, Kinoshita T, Nussenzweig V. Inhibition of complement activation on the surface of cells after incorporation of decay-accelerating factor (DAF) into their membranes. J Exp Med. 1984;160:1558–1578. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Seya T, Turner JR, Atkinson JP. Purification and characterization of a membrane protein (gp45-70) that is a cofactor for cleavage of C3b and C4b. J Exp Med. 1986;163:837–855. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Klickstein LB, Bartow TJ, Miletic V, Rabson LD, Smith JA, Fearon DT. Identification of distinct C3b and C4b recognition sites in the human C3b/C4b receptor (CR1, CD35) by deletion mutagenesis. J Exp Med. 1988;168:1699–1717. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Zalman LS, Wood LM, Muller-Eberhard HJ. Inhibition of antibody-dependent lymphocyte cytotoxicity by homologous restriction factor incorporated into target cell membranes. J Exp Med. 1987;166:947–955. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Miwa T, Song WC. Membrane complement regulatory proteins: insight from animal studies and relevance to human diseases. Int Immunopharmacol. 2001;1:445–459. [PubMed]
9. Kim YU, Kinoshita T, Molina H, Hourcade D, Seya T, Wagner LM, Holers VM. Mouse complement regulatory protein Crry/p65 uses the specific mechanisms of both human decay-accelerating factor and membrane cofactor protein. J Exp Med. 1995;181:151–159. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Tsujimura A, Shida K, Kitamura M, Nomura M, Takeda J, Tanaka H, Matsumoto M, Matsumiya K, Okuyama A, Nishimune Y, Okabe M, Seya T. Molecular cloning of a murine homologue of membrane cofactor protein (CD46): preferential expression in testicular germ cells. Biochem J. 1998;330(Pt 1):163–168. [PubMed]
11. Lin F, Fukuoka Y, Spicer A, Ohta R, Okada N, Harris CL, Emancipator SN, Medof ME. Tissue distribution of products of the mouse decay-accelerating factor (DAF) genes. Exploitation of a Daf1 knock-out mouse and site-specific monoclonal antibodies. Immunology. 2001;104:215–225. [PubMed]
12. Xu C, Mao D, Holers VM, Palanca B, Cheng AM, Molina H. A critical role for murine complement regulator crry in fetomaternal tolerance. Science. 2000;287:498–501. [PubMed]
13. Valencia X, Lipsky PE. CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in autoimmune diseases. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2007;3:619–626. [PubMed]
14. Kang SM, Tang Q, Bluestone JA. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in transplantation: progress, challenges and prospects. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:1457–1463. [PubMed]
15. Holt DS, Botto M, Bygrave AE, Hanna SM, Walport MJ, Morgan BP. Targeted deletion of the CD59 gene causes spontaneous intravascular hemolysis and hemoglobinuria. Blood. 2001;98:442–449. [PubMed]
16. Spiller OB, Harris CL, Morgan BP. Efficient generation of monoclonal antibodies against surface-expressed proteins by hyperexpression in rodent cells. J Immunol Methods. 1999;224:51–60. [PubMed]
17. Quigg RJ, Holers VM, Morgan BP, Sneed AE., 3rd Crry and CD59 regulate complement in rat glomerular epithelial cells and are inhibited by the nephritogenic antibody of passive Heymann nephritis. J Immunol. 1995;154:3437–3443. [PubMed]
18. Quigg RJ, Nicholson-Weller A, Cybulsky AV, Badalamenti J, Salant DJ. Decay accelerating factor regulates complement activation on glomerular epithelial cells. J Immunol. 1989;142:877–882. [PubMed]
19. Law SK, Lichtenberg NA, Levine RP. Covalent binding and hemolytic activity of complement proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980;77:7194–7198. [PubMed]
20. Medof ME, Iida K, Nussenzweig V. Role of the complement receptor CR1 in the processing of substrate-bound C3. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1983;421:299–306. [PubMed]
21. Meri S, Morgan BP, Davies A, Daniels RH, Olavesen MG, Waldmann H, Lachmann PJ. Human protectin (CD59), an 18,000-20,000 MW complement lysis restricting factor, inhibits C5b-8 catalysed insertion of C9 into lipid bilayers. Immunology. 1990;71:1–9. [PubMed]
22. Zalman LS, Wood LM, Frank MM, Muller-Eberhard HJ. Deficiency of the homologous restriction factor in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. J Exp Med. 1987;165:572–577. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Richards A, Kathryn Liszewski M, Kavanagh D, Fang CJ, Moulton E, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Remuzzi G, Noris M, Goodship TH, Atkinson JP. Implications of the initial mutations in membrane cofactor protein (MCP; CD46) leading to atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Mol Immunol. 2007;44:111–122. [PubMed]
24. Lin F, Emancipator SN, Salant DJ, Medof ME. Decay-accelerating factor confers protection against complement-mediated podocyte injury in acute nephrotoxic nephritis. Lab Invest. 2002;82:563–569. [PubMed]
25. Lin F, Kaminski HJ, Conti-Fine BM, Wang W, Richmonds C, Medof ME. Markedly enhanced susceptibility to experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis in the absence of decay-accelerating factor protection. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:1269–1274. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Zheng Y, Josefowicz SZ, Kas A, Chu TT, Gavin MA, Rudensky AY. Genome-wide analysis of Foxp3 target genes in developing and mature regulatory T cells. Nature. 2007;445:936–940. [PubMed]
27. Teague TK, Hildeman D, Kedl RM, Mitchell T, Rees W, Schaefer BC, Bender J, Kappler J, Marrack P. Activation changes the spectrum but not the diversity of genes expressed by T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:12691–12696. [PubMed]
28. Heeger PS, Lalli PN, Lin F, Valujskikh A, Liu J, Muqim N, Xu Y, Medof ME. Decay-accelerating factor modulates induction of T cell immunity. J Exp Med. 2005;201:1523–1530. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Nicholson-Weller A, Russian DA, Austen KF. Natural killer cells are deficient in the surface expression of the complement regulatory protein, decay accelerating factor (DAF) J Immunol. 1986;137:1275–1279. [PubMed]
30. Finberg RW, White W, Nicholson-Weller A. Decay-accelerating factor expression on either effector or target cells inhibits cytotoxicity by human natural killer cells. J Immunol. 1992;149:2055–2060. [PubMed]