PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Heart Rhythm. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 May 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2695449
NIHMSID: NIHMS114670

Mapping Ventricular Fibrillation: A Simplified Experimental Model Leads to a Complicated Result

Minimally invasive recording techniques such as Holter monitoring and surface lead ECGs provide the opportunity to observe the incidence of arrhythmic events without significantly changing the heart. Despite significant effort and decades of work in this area, noninvasive mapping from the body surface does not provide sufficient resolution or accuracy to interpret the complex activation patterns and wavefronts that maintain ventricular fibrillation (VF).1 Therefore, cardiac mapping of VF has been performed with various cardiac models that facilitate the direct recording of cardiac activation patterns. Mapping of cardiac arrhythmias with a few epicardial electrodes decades ago has progressed to advanced panoramic optical mapping techniques with thousands of simultaneous recordings.2 The epicardial surface of the heart has been mapped extensively, with more limited data obtained from endocardial mapping methods. Transmural mapping is significantly more difficult to perform without altering the heart to such an extent that it is no longer representative of an intact heart model. Transmural activation has been recorded with scattered or closely spaced plunge needles, or optrodes3, 4; however, these techniques are technically challenging and cause local ischemia and significant changes in the electrophysiological substrate of the heart. Perfused wedge preparations provide a window to glimpse transmural activation patterns optically, but this technique also significantly alters VF patterns.5 All of the available cardiac mapping techniques provide a view of a portion of the heart with some modification to it that may alter VF activation patterns. Interpretation of mapping studies in which activity of only part of the heart is recorded is difficult. Investigators performing ventricular tachycardia (VT) or VF mapping find that increased temporal and spatial resolution as well as recordings from inaccessible areas of the heart would be useful in understanding complex activation patterns and wavefronts that occur during cardiac arrhythmias.

Computer simulations provide an opportunity to understand certain mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias. Computer simulations allow for simultaneous observation of all simulated tissue without causing observer error. Unfortunately, physiologically accurate models are difficult to construct, in part because we are still learning about the elements required to build the models. On a cellular level, we are still gaining an understanding of ion channels, gap junctions, connexons, charge pumps, metabolism, excitation-contraction coupling, signaling, gene expression, and other phenomenon. Current cardiomyocyte models involve dozens of equations that describe ion channel behavior, charge pumps, leak currents, and other factors that affect cellular electrophysiology.6 Creating 3-dimensional models with thousands or millions of these simulated cells becomes a challenging task that requires immense computing power. Fiber orientation, anatomical obstacles, tissue heterogeneities, pharmacological interventions, and external events such as pacing, defibrillation, and stretch activation are difficult to simulate accurately in computer models. Creating a physiologically accurate model of normal cardiac tissue is daunting; simulating pathological conditions requires significantly altered models for which the required physiological data is not currently available. For these reasons, computer simulations have not been able to replace experimental models in many areas of arrhythmia research.

Decades of cardiac mapping and simulations have revealed that VF is a complex phenomenon maintained by many mechanisms such as spiral wave (SW) reentry, intramural and endocardial foci, intramural wandering wavelets, and anatomically anchored mother rotors.2, 7 In this issue of Heart Rhythm, a study performed by Ishiguro et al. takes advantage of traditional optical mapping techniques that allow for observation of only the most epicardial layer of the heart. 8 In order to eliminate contributions from tissue that cannot be mapped, the endocardium and the bulk of the myocardium was cryoablated, leaving only a thin layer of epicardium (~1 mm). One important mechanism of VT and VF maintenance was preserved in this model used by Ishiguro et al: SW reentry. 9 By performing the study on this reduced experimental model, they have eliminated other mechanisms such as intramural and endocardial foci, intramural wandering wavelets, and anatomically anchored mother rotors.

Ishiguro et al. reported that sodium current (INa) blockade with pilsicainide caused a prolongation of functional block lines and an increase in reentrant path length, which may have led to a decrease in wavefront-tail interactions. The result was stabilization of SW reentrant circuits at longer cycle lengths than in control hearts. They reported that L-type calcium current (ICa,L) blockade with verapamil shortened action potential duration and VT cycle length and likewise increased the stability of reentrant circuits. Surprisingly, ICa,L and INa blockers combined destabilized SW reentry by causing large spatial drift of the circuit and decremental conduction that led to termination of VT. Even in this simplified model of VT that exhibits only SW reentry, two distinct channel blockers that independently increase SW reentry stability lead to breakdown of SW reentry when given together. In a more intact model of VF or VT, the influence of ICa,L and INa blockers on SW reentry would be difficult to distinguish from the effect of these channel blockers on the other mechanisms of VF maintenance.

While this model has the advantage of isolating a single mechanism of VF maintenance, there are numerous reasons that VF and VT patterns in this model may not be representative of VF and VT in human subjects. A partial list of these limitations includes: 1) isolation and perfusion of the heart changes VF patterns10, 2) croyablation technique eliminates transmural reentry11, 3) anatomical anchors and structures thought to be important in reentry and VF maintenance are altered and eliminated12, 13, 4) electrically induced VF in healthy hearts may not be the same as VF in ischemic hearts14, 15, 5) the Purkinje and specialized conduction system of the heart were eliminated16, 17, 6) collagenous septae between muscle bundles may be more sparse in the epicardial layer than in the bulk of the myocardium18, 7) only one surface of the heart was mapped which limits the incidence of reentry to circuits entirely contained in the mapped region19, 8) the electromechanical uncoupling agent may have changed electrophysiological properties of the surviving layer10, 20, 21, 9) staining for optical mapping may change electrophysiological activation patterns10, 22, 10) rabbit and human VF patterns differ significantly23, 11) elimination of sympathetic and parasympathetic inputs24, 12) transmural variations in gap junction distribution, ionic currents, and action potential characteristics were eliminated25, and 13) verapamil and pilsicainide may not cleanly affect only L-type Ca2+ (ICa,L) and Na+ (INa,) respectively26, 27.

The model used by Ishiguro et al. substantially modifies the heart and renders it incapable of maintaining VF. Ishiguro et al. have been careful not to overstate the findings of the study due to the limitations of the experimental model. They have, however, provided valuable insight into the role of ICa,L and INa separately and jointly on SW reentry in an experimental model of 2-dimensional cardiac tissue. The effect of verapamil and pilsicainide in more intact hearts and on other mechanisms of VF and VT maintenance are not discussed by the authors. Further testing in more intact models will be required to determine what the net effect of ICa,L and INa on VF and VT maintenance with the added complexity of larger and more intact heart models.

While simplified experimental models have the potential to modify the arrhythmia that is being studied, they may provide opportunities reduce complexity and to separate competing mechanisms that may otherwise be indistinguishable. VF is perpetuated by multiple mechanisms that are difficult to study and understand when they exist together. As demonstrated by the study of Ishiguro et al., even models that reduce complexity by limiting VT maintenance to a single mechanism may have unexpected results. Experimental models that modify VF activation patterns may still provide important insights into the mechanisms that drive and maintain VF. Reduced experimental models have an important role in understanding specific mechanisms and phenomenon in cardiac arrhythmia research, but care must be taken when relating the findings from studies using these models to human subjects and to clinical application.

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants HL-66256 and HL-28429

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Nash MP, Pullan AJ. Challenges facing validation of noninvasive electrical imaging of the heart. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2005;10:73–82. [PubMed]
2. Ideker RE. Ventricular fibrillation: how do we put the genie back in the bottle? Heart Rhythm. 2007;4:665–74. [PubMed]
3. Li L, Jin Q, Huang J, et al. Intramural foci during long duration fibrillation in the pig ventricle. Circ Res. 2008;102:1256–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Kong W, Fakhari N, Sharifov OF, et al. Optical measurements of intramural action potentials in isolated porcine hearts using optrodes. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4:1430–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Valderrabano M, Lee MH, Ohara T, et al. Dynamics of intramural and transmural reentry during ventricular fibrillation in isolated swine ventricles. Circ Res. 2001;88:839–48. [PubMed]
6. Kleber AG, Rudy Y. Basic mechanisms of cardiac impulse propagation and associated arrhythmias. Physiol Rev. 2004;84:431–88. [PubMed]
7. Tabereaux PB, Dosdall DJ, Ideker RE. Mechanisms of VF maintenance: Wandering wavelets, mother rotors, or foci. Heart Rhythm. In Press, Uncorrected Proof. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Ishiguro YS, Honjo H, Opthof T, et al. Early termination of spiral wave reentry by combined blockade of Na+ and L-type Ca2+ currents in a perfused two-dimensional epicardial layer of rabbit ventricular myocardium. Heart Rhythm. In Press. [PubMed]
9. Davidenko JM, Pertsov AV, Salomonsz R, et al. Stationary and drifting spiral waves of excitation in isolated cardiac muscle. Nature. 1992;355:349–51. [PubMed]
10. Qin H, Kay MW, Chattipakorn N, et al. Effects of heart isolation, voltage-sensitive dye, and electromechanical uncoupling agents on ventricular fibrillation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;284:H1818–26. [PubMed]
11. Clayton RH, Holden AV. Filament behavior in a computational model of ventricular fibrillation in the canine heart. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004;51:28–34. [PubMed]
12. Nielsen TD, Huang J, Rogers JM, et al. Epicardial mapping of ventricular fibrillation over the posterior descending artery and left posterior papillary muscle of the swine heart. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Qin H, Huang J, Rogers JM, et al. Mechanisms for the maintenance of ventricular fibrillation: the nonuniform dispersion of refractoriness, restitution properties, or anatomic heterogeneities? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16:888–97. [PubMed]
14. Niemann JT, Rosborough JP, Youngquist S, et al. Is all ventricular fibrillation the same? A comparison of ischemically induced with electrically induced ventricular fibrillation in a porcine cardiac arrest and resuscitation model. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1356–61. [PubMed]
15. Wang J, Weil MH, Tang W, et al. A comparison of electrically induced cardiac arrest with cardiac arrest produced by coronary occlusion. Resuscitation. 2007;72:477–83. [PubMed]
16. Dosdall DJ, Tabereaux PB, Kim JJ, et al. Chemical ablation of the Purkinje system causes early termination and activation rate slowing of long-duration ventricular fibrillation in dogs. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008;295:H883–9. [PubMed]
17. Tabereaux PB, Walcott GP, Rogers JM, et al. Activation patterns of Purkinje fibers during long-duration ventricular fibrillation in an isolated canine heart model. Circulation. 2007;116:1113–9. [PubMed]
18. Hooks DA, Tomlinson KA, Marsden SG, et al. Cardiac microstructure: implications for electrical propagation and defibrillation in the heart. Circ Res. 2002;91:331–8. [PubMed]
19. Rogers JM, Walcott GP, Gladden JD, et al. Panoramic optical mapping reveals continuous epicardial reentry during ventricular fibrillation in the isolated swine heart. Biophys J. 2007;92:1090–5. [PubMed]
20. Kettlewell S, Walker NL, Cobbe SM, et al. The electrophysiological and mechanical effects of 2,3-butane-dione monoxime and cytochalasin-D in the Langendorff perfused rabbit heart. Exp Physiol. 2004;89:163–72. [PubMed]
21. Lee MH, Lin SF, Ohara T, et al. Effects of diacetyl monoxime and cytochalasin D on ventricular fibrillation in swine right ventricles. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001;280:H2689–96. [PubMed]
22. Novakova M, Bardonova J, Provaznik I, et al. Effects of voltage sensitive dye di-4-ANEPPS on guinea pig and rabbit myocardium. Gen Physiol Biophys. 2008;27:45–54. [PubMed]
23. Panfilov AV. Is heart size a factor in ventricular fibrillation? Or how close are rabbit and human hearts? Heart Rhythm. 2006;3:862–4. [PubMed]
24. Zipes DP. Heart-brain interactions in cardiac arrhythmias: role of the autonomic nervous system. Cleve Clin J Med. 2008;75 (Suppl 2):S94–6. [PubMed]
25. Antzelevitch C, Fish J. Electrical heterogeneity within the ventricular wall. Basic Res Cardiol. 2001;96:517–27. [PubMed]
26. Zhang S, Zhou Z, Gong Q, et al. Mechanism of block and identification of the verapamil binding domain to HERG potassium channels. Circ Res. 1999;84:989–98. [PubMed]
27. Kihara Y, Inoko M, Hatakeyama N, et al. Mechanisms of negative inotropic effects of class Ic antiarrhythmic agents: comparative study of the effects of flecainide and pilsicainide on intracellular calcium handling in dog ventricular myocardium. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1996;27:42–51. [PubMed]