At the time of initial evaluation of this newborn, a genetic syndrome was considered the most likely cause of her multiple malformations. While the changes associated with the CDH were indistinguishable from sporadic diaphragmatic hernia, the other anomalies, both internal and external, suggested Fryns syndrome [
Fryns, 1987;
Fryns et al., 1979]. In a review of 52 cases of Fryns syndrome, the most common manifestations were CDH, usually left-sided (96.1%), pulmonary hypoplasia (65.4%), nail hypoplasia (59.6%), brachyphalangy (49.6%), polyhydramnios (55.8%), anomalous ears (55.8%), cleft palate (50.0%), and VSD (40.4%) [
Slavotinek, 2004]. Her craniofacial findings, particularly ocular hypertelorism and retrognathia, were suggestive of Fryns syndrome and are each seen in 36.5% of children with this diagnosis. The only finding typical of Fryns syndrome that she lacked was marked hypoplasia of the distal phalanges of the fingers. Although tracheoesophageal fistula is not a common finding in Fryns syndrome, it has been described in a few children with this diagnosis [
Ayme et al., 1989;
Slavotinek, 2004;
Slavotinek et al., 2005]. In this patient, no significant genetic abnormalities were detected, including evaluations for chromosomal aberrations such as tetrasomy 12p (Pallister-Killian) which shows some overlap with Fryns syndrome [
Enns et al., 1998], and research array CGH studies. Because the mortality in Fryns syndrome is so high secondary to pulmonary hypoplasia, and since those children who have survived beyond infancy have usually exhibited severe mental retardation [
Slavotinek, 2004], the family chose to withdraw support. The parents were counseled regarding a probable 25% chance of recurrence in a subsequent pregnancy based on the autosomal recessive inheritance of Fryns syndrome.
At the time that this child was born in early 2005, there was limited information about the teratogenic risks of prenatal exposure to MMF. Some series reported normal outcomes of prenatal exposure to MMF, with no malformations identified in 15 infants whose mothers took the drug during pregnancy [
Tendron et al., 2002]. However, unpublished studies on pregnant rats and rabbits suggested that there might be an increased risk of miscarriage and defects of the head and eyes in rodent fetuses exposed to doses equivalent to those used in humans [Mycophenolate mofetil package insert;
Sifontis et al., 2006]. One case report described a child with a vascular abnormality, hypoplastic nails and short fifth fingers born to a woman who had a renal transplant at six weeks of pregnancy and was treated with MMF [
Pergola et al., 2001]. Another early report described a fetus exposed to MMF during the first 13 weeks of gestation born with agenesis of the corpus callosum, cleft lip and palate, micrognathia, ocular hypertelorism, microtia with external auditory canal atresia, and a left pelvic ectopic kidney [
Le Ray et al., 2004]. In the past several years, more publications have outlined the prenatal effects of MMF, with a recurring pattern of malformations including microtia or anotia, cleft lip and/or palate, congenital heart defects, facial anomalies including ocular hypertelorism and micrognathia, and rarely, digital hypoplasia [
Ang et al., 2008;
Carey, 2008;
Le Ray et al., 2004;
Perez-Aytes et al., 2008;
Pergola et al., 2001;
Sifontis et al., 2006;
Tjeertes et al., 2007]. Many of these features overlap with those identified in our patient; in particular, the ear anomalies in our patient are very similar to those in recent case reports of MMF exposure [
Ang et al., 2008;
Perez-Aytes et al., 2008] and in retrospect, are more severe than typically described in Fryns syndrome. Based on the limited information available in 2005, the family was counseled that there was a possibility that her birth defects were related to her exposure to MMF during the pregnancy, and the family was referred to the National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry (NTPR). In fact, this case has been published in brief form in 2006 [
Sifontis et al., 2006]. Thus far, this is the only published human occurrence of CDH in prenatal MMF exposure. Other novel findings in this case include vertebral clefts and complex vascular anomalies. The more extensive phenotype in this patient than that typically seen in MMF-exposed fetuses may suggest that multiple drug exposures, or a combination of genetic and environmental factors, contributed to the many malformations. Although data suggest that tacrolimus and prednisone are not associated with significant risks of birth defects in an exposed fetus [
Mastrobattista and Katz, 2004], her mother was taking other immunosuppressive and antihypertensive medications, so an additive effect is possible.
A mechanism for the development of CDH in MMF exposure has not been proposed. One hypothesis is that MMF may have similar developmental effects as the gene defects that cause Fryns syndrome, thus resulting in similar birth defects. However, it is difficult to hypothesize how a drug that impairs purine metabolism in lymphocytes could produce such a broad spectrum of birth defects. Unfortunately, there are no published studies describing the effects of prenatal MMF exposure in animal models. The drug package insert states that at doses equivalent to those used in humans, there were increased rates of fetal loss and malformations; specifically, “in rat offspring, malformations included anophthalmia, agnathia, and hydrocephaly. In rabbit offspring, malformations included ectopia cordis, ectopic kidneys,
diaphragmatic hernia, and umbilical hernia” (p. 16) [Mycophenolate mofetil package insert] (emphasis added by author). Of note, in October 2007, the Food and Drug Administration and the drug manufacturer revised the pregnancy category of MMF to a Pregnancy Category D drug (positive evidence of fetal risk), acknowledging the increased risk of first trimester pregnancy loss and congenital malformations [
Ang et al., 2008].
Although a child born with multiple congenital anomalies may have findings similar to those of a known genetic syndrome, careful review of pregnancy exposures, particularly drugs with an unknown or incompletely determined teratogenic spectrum, may suggest an alternative etiology with markedly different recurrence risks. In this patient, the features suggestive of Fryns syndrome are more likely, in retrospect, due to prenatal MMF exposure. The findings in this patient suggest that MMF exposure can produce a phenocopy of a genetic syndrome, Fryns syndrome. Further information about the mechanism of action of MMF may yield clues as to the etiology of CDH and, potentially, genetic causes of Fryns syndrome.