PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 May 15.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2688455
NIHMSID: NIHMS104915

Interaction of the IκBα C-terminal PEST sequence with NF-κB: Insights into the Inhibition of NF-κB DNA binding by IκBα

Abstract

The transcription factor NF-κB (p50/p65) binds either a κB DNA element or its inhibitor protein, IκBα, but these two binding events are mutually exclusive. The reason for this exclusivity is not obvious from the available crystal structure data. The C-terminal PEST-like sequence of IκBα appears to be involved in the process, but it is located in both of the published X-ray structures of the IκBα/NF-κB complex at a significant distance away from the DNA contact loop in the NF-κB DNA-binding domain. We have used nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and differential isotopic labeling to probe the interactions between the p50/p65 NF-κB heterodimer and IκBα in solution. Our measurements are able to resolve a local structural discrepancy between the two crystal structures, and we confirm that the primary interaction of the IκBα PEST domain is with the DNA-binding domain of the p65 subunit. Mutagenesis of key arginine residues in the DNA contact sequence results in the loss of specific interaction of the PEST sequence with the p65 subdomain. We conclude that the local structure of the IκBα/NF-κB complex in the region of the PEST sequence is consistent with a direct interaction of this acidic sequence with the basic DNA contact sequence in p65, thus reducing the affinity of NF-κB for DNA by a competitive mechanism that is still to be elucidated fully.

Keywords: transcriptional activation, NMR

INTRODUCTION

NF-κBs constitute a family of transcriptional activators with five members in mammalian systems, p50 (p105 precursor), p52 (p100 precursor), p65 (RelA), c-Rel and RelB.1-3 Each member of the NF-κB family contains a highly conserved ~300 residue segment at the N-terminus. This segment, termed the Rel homology region (RHR) consists of two immunoglobulin-like domains, an N-terminal DNA-binding domain and a C-terminal dimerization domain, which are critical for nearly all NF-κB functions.4,5 Different combinations of components derived from different members of the NF-κB family promote the formation of a variety of homo- and heterodimers.1,2 The p50/p65 heterodimer (shown schematically in Figure 1) was the first discovered6 and is the most abundant form of NF-κB.1,4

Figure 1
Schematic representation of the domain boundaries of the NF-κB and IκBα constructs used in this study.

NF-κB is regulated by association with IκB inhibitors, including IκBα, IκBβ and Iκbε.3 In unstressed cells, NF-κB associates with IκB to form a stable complex, which is sequestered in the cytoplasm. The classic heterodimer p50/p65 is predominantly regulated by IκBα, 3,7 and this cytoplasmic complex mediates rapid response to activating signals.3 Within minutes after the application of extracellular stimuli such as pro-inflammatory cytokines,8 lipopolysaccharide9 and tumor necrosis factor,10 the signal response domain at the N-terminus of IκBα is phosphorylated by activated IκB kinase (IKK),3 which leads to ubiquitination of IκBα and its subsequent degradation by the 26S proteasome.4,11,12 NF-κB, released from the IκB complex, is translocated to the nucleus where it can activate gene transcription by binding to the κB DNA site. Since the gene coding for IκBα itself is one of the downstream genes regulated by NF-κB, expression of IκBα also occurs as a consequence of NF-κB activation,7 and the newly synthesized inhibitor rebinds to NF-κB, inactivating its transcriptional activity by removing it from the DNA and mediating its export from the nucleus.7

Structural studies of the NF-κB/IκBα interaction include X-ray crystal structures of the NF-κB/IκBα complex, determined by two independent groups.13,14 The IκBα structure in the complex (shown schematically in Figure 1) includes six stacked ankyrin (ANK) repeats and a C-terminal PEST sequence.13,14 PEST sequences are rich in proline, glutamic acid, serine and threonine residues and are thought to be related to protein degradation12,15 and to inhibit binding of NF-κB to DNA.16,17 The NF-κB protein characterized in the two structures consists of fragments of p65 (including the DNA-binding domain, dimerization domain and C-terminal nuclear localization signal peptide, NLS) and p50 (dimerization domain only). IκBα and NF-κB form an extensive noncontiguous binding surface, with ANK 1−2 contacting the p65 NLS and ANK 4−6 closely associated with the p50 and p65 dimerization domains; the C-terminal PEST sequence was found to pack on the top of p65 DNA-binding domain.13,14

More recently, additional structural information has become available in solution for IκBα both free and bound to NF-κB, using NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry.18-20 A streamlined preparation method was adopted to prepare NF-κB/IκBα complexes that are precisely and specifically labeled, with IκBα labeled with 2H, 13C and 15N and p50 and p65 uniformly deuterated.20 Combining a fragment-based assignment strategy, complete backbone resonance assignments were made for IκBα (residues 67−287, the minimal fragment required for dissociating NF-κB from DNA16,17) in complex with NF-κB (both dimerization and DNA-binding domains of both p65 and p5020). The molecular weight of this complex is 94 kDa. Free IκBα is apparently fluxional or molten globular in the region of ANK5−6;20,21 this region undergoes a structural and dynamic transition as it folds upon binding to NF-κB,18,20,21 and the center of the molecule, principally ANK3, becomes more flexible in the complex than in the free state.20

Although IκBα-mediated down-regulation of the transcriptional activity of NF-κB has been known for many years, the mechanism by which nuclear IκBα competes with the κB DNA sequence for NF-κB binding, thus turning off the transcription of stress-related genes, remains unknown. On the one hand, biochemical and mutagenesis studies implicate binding of IκB to a specific site, the DNA-binding loop on NF-κB.22 This interaction was found to occur through the PEST motif of IκBα.23 On the other hand, a completely different interaction was observed in the X-ray crystal structures13,14 between the C-terminal PEST sequence of IκBα and the N-terminal DNA-binding domain of NF-κB p65: the PEST sequence appears to be located too far from the DNA-binding loop on NF-κB to be responsible for the specific effects noted in the biochemical experiments.22,23 If the PEST sequence is indeed located far from the DNA-binding loop, it was suggested that its effect might be to lower the affinity of NF-κB for DNA by altering its conformation to an inactive form.13,16,24 Following our successful characterization of the NF-κB – IκBα system in solution by NMR,20 we report the elucidation of the interactions of the PEST sequence of IκBα in solution, in complex with NF-kB constructs containing various domains of p50 and p65.

RESULTS

Structural Analysis of the IκBα C-terminus

In order to dissect the role of the PEST sequence in the complex between IκBα and NF-κB, we made a detailed examination of the two X-ray structures of this complex, published by two independent groups (PDB 1NFI14 and 1IKN13). The protein components of the two structures differ only slightly in length, and the two structures are highly similar.25 In this study, we focus on the structural features of the IκBα C-terminal region and their relationship to the function of IκBα in the p50/p65 complex. A careful comparison of the C-terminal structure of the complexed IκBα in the two sets of X-ray coordinates shows two discrepancies (Figure 2). First, there is a difference in the orientation of the side chain of W258 (Figure 2B). In structure 1NFI, a hydrogen bond is shown between W258(εH) and the backbone carbonyl of L277, but this hydrogen bond does not appear in structure 1IKN because the W258 side chain is in an orientation incompatible with its formation. Second, there is a 1-residue frame shift in the backbone position between 1IKN and 1NFI at residue 270 (Figure 2C). The dotted circle indicates the position of the side chain of Q271 in 1IKN; nothing is fit to the corresponding position in 1NFI. Instead, the Q271 side chain in 1NFI was fitted to the same position as the side chain of L272 in 1IKN, and L272 (1NFI) is fitted in the position of T273 (1IKN), and subsequent residues are frame shifted. This is illustrated by a comparison of the backbone dihedral angles (colored entries in Table 1). Regardless of the discrepancies in side chain position, the overall orientation of bond sin backbone and side chain are very similar between the two structures (backbone RMSD < 1Å) (Figure 2C), indicating the similarity of electron densities in the local regions. It is unlikely that these differences indicate the presence of two different conformations in the two structures, but rather reflects the difficulty of fitting residues into the marginal electron density of a region that is highly mobile in solution20 and likely disordered in the crystal.

Figure 2
Comparison of IκBα structures in the p50-p65 complex. A. Overlay of the two structures of IκBα (colored ribbons) from the two published X-ray structures (PDB 1NFI14 and 1IKN13). The NF-κB dimerization domain, p50 ...
Table 1
Comparison of dihedral angles for the PEST sequence of IκBα

Solution structure of the IκBα C-terminus

Local structure in the IκBα C-terminus was determined by two sets of NMR parameters: NOE connectivities identified from NOESY spectra and dihedral angles predicted from chemical shifts using the program TALOS.26 [2H, 15N]-labeled IκBα(67−287) in complex with [2H]-labeled p50(248−350)/p65(190−321) was used for acquiring the NOEs. NOE strips from a 15N-edited TROSY-NOESY-HSQC spectrum at the backbone 15N chemical shifts of residues L277 to L280 and the Nε side chain of W258 are shown in Figure 3A. The dotted lines indicate the NOE cross peaks that denote short distances between backbone amide protons (NH) and the W258 indole proton (εH). The relative intensities of the cross peaks can be correlated with internuclear distances via the r−6 distance dependence of the NOE. A relatively intense cross peak (distance estimate ~ 4.5 Å) is observed for the W258(εH)-to-L280 NH connectivity, and there are weak NOEs (distance estimate ~ 5−6 Å) for the W258(εH)-to-Q278 NH and W258(εH)-to-M279 NH connectivities. These distances are consistent with the presence of a hydrogen bond between the NεH of W258 and the backbone CO of Q278, illustrated in Figure 3B.

Figure 3
NMR identification of C-terminal structure of bound IκBα. A. Strip plots in the HN-HN region of the 15N-NOESY-TROSY-HSQC spectrum (100ms, 600 MHz, 25°C) of [2H, 15N]-IκBα(67−287) in complex with [2H]-p50(248−350)/p65(190−321). ...

Neither of the X-ray coordinates matches the NOE constraints in this region (Figure 3B). In 1IKN, there is no hydrogen bond to the NεH of W258: the W258 side chain is rotated around the β-γ bond and the indole proton points away from the backbone of the PEST sequence (Figure 2B, ,3B);3B); the distance is thus too great for a detectable NOE to be expected (Table 2). In 1NFI, the NεH of W258 makes a hydrogen bond, but it is with the CO of L277 rather than that of Q278. This close approach should yield significant NOEs, but the strongest NOE is expected to be between W258(εH) and M279 NH instead of the observed connectivity to L280 NH (Figure 3B). Both structures match the NOE data imperfectly, but can be reconciled with it if elements of the two structures are incorporated into a hybrid structure. The hydrogen bonding of the W258 Nε to a backbone CO is incorporated from 1NFI, but the register of the backbone is incorporated from 1IKN: instead of the hydrogen bond being to the CO of L277 (as in 1NFI), it is to the CO of Q278. The two structures are merged to generate a hybrid coordinate set: the coordinates of residues from the N-terminus to L269 (including W258) are taken from 1NFI, and from G270 to the C-terminus is taken from 1IKN. The distances derived from 1IKN/1NFI hybrid structure match the observed NOEs (Table 2): the distance between W258(εH) and L280 NH is 4.4 Å, corresponding to the relatively intense long-range NOE shown in Figure 3A, and the two weak NOEs of proton pairs of W258(εH)/Q278 NH and W258(εH)/M279 NH correspond to the distances of 6.0 and 5.0 Å, respectively in the hybrid structure.

Table 2
Expected distances from the indole proton of W258 to various backbone NH

Further information on the backbone structure in the C-terminal region of IκBα is provided by the dihedral angle information predicted by TALOS from the measured NMR chemical shifts and the measured ([var phi], ψ) angles of 1IKN and 1NFI (Table 1). The angles derived from 1IKN are generally similar to those from the TALOS prediction, while the angles derived from 1NFI correspond to the predicted ones only if the backbone is frame-shifted by one residue, consistent with the NOE results.

Dynamic properties of the C-terminal PEST sequence

The local dynamics at the C-terminus of IκBα in the NF-κB complex (exploded view from the previously-published study20) is shown in Figure 4. After residue Q278, the 15N-R2 and [1H]-15N NOE show a gradual decrease from the values typical of a folded protein, while 15N-R1 values are increased. This result demonstrates that the backbone motions are gradually increased after Q278, consistent with our hypothesis that residue Q278 is immobilized by hydrogen bonding to the side chain of W258. We conclude that the region ending at Q278 can be treated as part of the fold of ANK 6 and the residues after Q278 should be considered random-coil-like, with high flexibility in solution.

Figure 4
Backbone amide 15N relaxation parameters for C-terminal PEST sequence of bound IκBα at 30°C, measured at 600 MHz (expanded from the data of Sue et al.20). A. R1, B. R2 and C. [1H]15N-NOE for residues 270−287. The triangles ...

Influence of C-terminal PEST on ANK 6

In order to function in the inhibition of DNA binding by NF-κB, a minimal length of IκBα, residues 67−287, is required:16 a shorter fragment of IκBα where the C-terminal PEST sequence had been deleted (IκBα 67−277) fails to dissociate DNA from NF-κB.16 Two possible roles for the PEST sequence are suggested by these results: (a) the PEST sequence competes with DNA for binding to NF-κB, so that removing the PEST sequence abolishes the interaction, or (b) the absence of the PEST sequence destabilizes the structure of the C-terminal ankyrin repeats in the complex, promoting the incompletely-folded and fluxional state of this region that is present in free IκBα.18,20

In order to determine the structural basis for the effects of IκBα C-terminal deletion, a truncated fragment, IκBα(67−275) was constructed and the [2H, 13C, 15N]-labeled IκBα(67−275)/p50(248−350)/p65(190−321) complex was prepared. Backbone assignments for this complex were made with reference to those of the longer fragment described above, and confirmed using a TROSY-type triple-resonance HNCA experiment. The resonances of ANK 6 were mostly assigned from the HNCA spectrum; the backbone NH resonance of T263 is missing.

The TROSY-HSQCs of p50(248−350)/p65(190−321) complexed IκBα(67−287) and IκBα(67−275) are superimposed in Figure 5A; residues with significant perturbations are indicated. The composite amide chemical shift difference, Δδ(N+NH) = [(δN2/25 + δNH2)/2]1/2, between the two complexes is shown in Figure 5B. It is noticeable that perturbations are present only in ANK 6, with local maxima at residues T247, S252 and E275. Negligible chemical shift differences are observed for the other ankyrin repeats, even for ANK 5, which shows Δδ(N+NH) generally less than 0.1 ppm, indicating a lack of significant structural variation between the two complexes. Since ANK 5 is immediately adjacent to ANK 6, with significant non-covalent contact between the two repeat domains, any significant conformational change in ANK 6 should induce detectable chemical shift perturbation in ANK 5. The results shown in Figure 5B therefore imply that there is no major structural change in ANK 6 when the C-terminal tail is removed. This conclusion is supported by a comparison of the 13Cα chemical shift differences Δδ(Cα), which confirm the secondary structural similarity between the two complexes (Figure 5C). The residues perturbed by truncation of the PEST sequence (Figure 5D) are present mainly at the C-terminus of ANK 6, in the immediate neighborhood of residue E275, or in the region (including S252 and W258) that contacts the PEST sequence in the hybrid structure derived above. Deletion of residues 276−287 has perturbed the local environment and caused variations in the chemical shift, but the fold of ANK 6 remains the same. This is consistent with the reported Kd value of 12 nM (25°C) for the complex between IκBα(67−275) and p50(248−350)/p65(190−321)27, which, although significantly weaker than that of IκBα(67−287) (0.32 nM at 37°C), remains strong enough to induce slow-exchange NMR behavior for the complex as a whole. We conclude that the presence of the PEST sequence does not contribute significantly to the structure of ANK 6, since ANK 6 adopts similar secondary and tertiary structures in the presence and absence of the C-terminal PEST. Thus, inhibition of NF-κB DNA binding by IκBα most likely involves direct contact between the PEST sequence and NF-κB.

Figure 5
Influence of C-terminal PEST sequence on ANK 6. A. Superposition of the 1H-15N TROSY-HSQCs of [2H, 15N, 13C]-IκBα(67−287) (blue) and [2H, 15N, 13C]-IκBα(67−275) (red) complexed with [2H]-p50(248−350)/p65(190−321). ...

The reason for the 250-fold decrease of binding affinity upon removal of the PEST sequence27 is unclear. Based on the similarity of structures, the binding difference might relate to local structural stability in the C-terminal ANKs of IκBα. Perhaps the presence of residues 276−287 stabilizes these ankyrin repeats through a capping mechanism in the complex28. If so, we would expect that the affinity decrease should be due primarily to lowered ANK6 affinity. Nevertheless, the pattern of chemical shift changes indicates that ANK6 remains fully stable (rather than becoming imperfectly folded as it would be in the free state). This observation may indicate that both ANK5 and ANK6 have to be dissociated in order for the instability of the free form to be realized. In addition, the free form of the truncated IκBα aggregates more readily, reflecting its lower stability.

The behavior of the W258(εH) in the NMR spectrum of the truncated fragment (Figure 5A) provides further evidence for the presence of the hydrogen bond between W258(εH) and the Q278 backbone carbonyl, described above. The 1H resonance of the W258(εH) shows a dramatic upfield shift in Figure 5A, indicative of the loss of the hydrogen bond when residues 276−287 are missing.

Dynamics of the PEST sequence in complex with NF-κB

It is clear from the relaxation data acquired for the complex IκBα (67−287)/p50(248−350)/p65(190−321) (Figure 4) that the backbone of the IκBα PEST sequence increases in flexibility following Q278, the site of the hydrogen bond to the W258 side chain. This complex contains only the dimerization domains of p50 and p65. The two X-ray structures13,14 contain the DNA-binding domain of p65 in addition to the two dimerization domains, and the PEST sequence shows a similar backbone structure (with variations described above) in each of these structures. Its position has been used to form hypotheses as to the function of the PEST sequence in the removal of NF-κB from DNA by IκBα. However, the full complex of IκBα and NF-κB contains both the DNA-binding and dimerization domains of both p65 and p50. We asked whether the presence of the p50 DNA-binding domain would cause changes in the behavior of the PEST sequence, and addressed this question by comparing the NMR spectra of the IκBα PEST domain in four complexes containing different domains of p50 and p65.

The four complexes are: IκBα(67−287)/p50(248−350)/p65(190−321), IκBα(67−287)/p50(248−350)/p65(19−321), IκBα(67−287)/p50(39−350)/p65(190−321) and IκBα(67−287)/p50(39−350)/p65(19−321). These complexes are shown schematically in Figure 6, together with regions of TROSY-HSQC spectra containing the PEST assignments. The influence of the addition of the p50 DNA-binding domain is shown by the difference between the spectra in Figures 6A [IκBα(67−287)/p50(248−350)/p65(190−321)] and 6B [IκBα(67−287)/p50(39−350)/p65(190−321)], while the effect of addition of the p65 DNA-binding domain is shown by the difference between Figures 6A and 6C [IκBα(67−87)/p50(248−350)/p65(19−321)]. The effect of addition of both DNA-binding domains is shown in Figure 6D. A histogram illustrating the relative size of the perturbations in the resonances of the PEST sequence is shown in Figure 7A.

Figure 6
900-MHz TROSY-HSQC spectra of [2H, 15N]-IκBα(67−287) in complex with NF-κB fragments. A. [2H]-p50(248−350)/p65(190−321), B. [2H]-p50(39−350)/p65(190−321), C. [2H]-p50(248−350)/p65(19−321), ...
Figure 7
A. Variation of the composite backbone NH and 15N chemical shift differences for the PEST sequence of IκBα, obtained from the spectra in Figure 6. The effect of addition of the N-terminal domains of p50 (red bars, corresponding to differences ...

The comparison leads to four major observations. Firstly, the p50 N-terminal domain (red bars in Figure 7A) makes a slight but significant perturbation in the chemical shifts of residues S283, D285 and E286, suggesting the presence of a weak interaction between the p50 N-terminal domain and this region of the IκBα PEST sequence. Secondly, the p65 N-terminal domain (yellow and orange bars) produces similar but more significant perturbations in the resonances of the PEST sequence. The cross peak of residue S283 is shifted in the same way and to the same extent as for the complex containing the p50 N-terminal domain (Figure 6B), but D285 and E286 show multiple cross peaks (yellow and orange bars in Figure 7A) and a shift to higher field in both 1H and 15N dimensions. Other residues in the PEST sequence show slight chemical shift perturbations. Thirdly, the presence of both p65 and p50 N-terminal domains (Figure 6D, green bars in Figure 7A) induces chemical shift perturbations similar to those caused by addition of the p65 N-terminal domain alone. The broadened cross peaks for residues D285 and E286 of Figure 6D are in the same position as the split resonances in Figure 6C. The similarity between Figures 6C and D implies that the PEST sequence binds preferentially to the p65 N-terminal domain. The only major difference between the two spectra is that residue S283 shows an additional cross peak (blue bar in Figure 7A), additional line broadening and weaker intensity in Figure 6D, which may suggest that this residue makes additional interactions in the full complex. Finally, there is negligible perturbation of the resonances of remaining portions of IκBα, including all of the ANK repeats, indicating that, consistent with the X-ray structures, there is no contact in the complex between the NF-κB N-terminal domains and the ANK repeats.

The complexes in Figure 6A-C behave similarly in solution, reflected in the consistent and narrow linewidths of the resonances. However in the largest complex (Figure 6D), which incorporates both N-terminal domains, the resonances are dramatically broadened, even though a lower protein concentration (0.15 mM) was used to minimize intermolecular contact between the complexes. It is unlikely that this broadening is due only to an increase in molecular weight of ~ 20 kDa. This observation may instead be an indication of differential dynamics within the larger complex. The IκBα PEST sequence recognizes preferentially the p65 N-terminal domain, which will serve to anchor this domain to some extent to the main bulk of the complex. However, the p50 N-terminal domain is likely to be relatively mobile in this complex (presumably less so in the complex shown in Figure 6B since it interacts weakly with the PEST sequence in that complex). The presence of a flexibly-tethered domain will increase the effective radius of the entire complex, resulting in a reduction of the overall tumbling rate. This effect would be consistent with the difficulty of crystallizing the IκBα/NF-κB complex containing both N-terminal domains, such that the available X-ray structures contain only the p65 N-terminal domain.

Contact site for IκBα PEST on NF-κB

The involvement of the acidic PEST sequence in the inhibition of NF-κB DNA binding is well established. Our results confirm that the PEST sequence makes direct contact preferentially with the p65 N-terminal domain. However, there is some inconsistency in the literature between reports that the RXXRXRXXC DNA-binding motif is the site of interaction of the IκBα PEST sequence22,23 and the two X-ray structures,13,14 which show that the PEST is closest to (but not within ~ 10 Å of) the first arginine at the N-terminal end of the DNA-binding motif on the p65 DNA-binding domain. In these structures, all of the other arginines are greater than 25 Å from the PEST domain.

In order to investigate the interaction site for the IκBα PEST sequence on the p65 DNA-binding domain, and in particular to ascertain whether the DNA-binding loop is involved, we constructed three NF-κB mutants where arginine residues in the conserved DNA-binding motif were substituted with alanine: p65(19−321, R30A/R33A/R35A), p65(19−321, R33A/R35A) and p65(19−321, R30A). The [2H, 15N]-labeled IκBα(67−287) in complex with the individual p50(248−350)/p65(19−321) mutants were prepared and the corresponding TROSY-HSQCs are plotted in Figure 8. The complexes with the double and triple mutants R33A/R35A and R30A/R33A/R35A (Figure 8B,C) show differences in the resonances of the PEST sequence, compared to the wild-type heterodimer complex (Figure 8A). The single mutation R30A (Figure 8D) does not affect the resonances of the PEST sequences. The spectra of the double and triple mutants (Figures 8B and C) are identical to each other, and are almost identical to those observed for the complex where the NF-κB N-terminal domain is absent (Figure 6A). This is illustrated in Figure 7B, where the yellow and orange bars represent the same data as in Figure 7A for the difference between the (wild-type) p50(248−350)/p65(19−321)-IκB complex and the p50(248−350)/p65(190−321)-IκB complex. The triple (blue bars) and double (purple bars) mutants are almost identical to the complex in the absence of the p65 N-terminal domain), while the single mutant (pink and brown bars) closely resembles the wild-type complex (yellow and orange bars). We conclude that R33 and R35 are critical for the binding of the acidic PEST sequence of IκBα, whereas R30, which appears to make no additional contribution in the triple mutant compared to the double mutant, is likely not involved. These same two arginine side chains are inserted into the major groove of the DNA in the NF-κB/DNA complex, mediating direct sequence-specific contact with the DNA bases GUA14 and GUA15 of the κB recognition element,29 while the R30 side chain points away from the DNA. Our results indicate that the κB recognition element and the PEST sequence compete for the same binding site on NF-κB, which includes residues R33 and R35, but likely not R30.

Figure 8
900-MHz TROSY-HSQC spectra for [2H, 15N]-IκBα(67−287) in complex with NF-κB mutants, substituting Arg residues to Ala in the p65 N-terminal DNA-binding domain. A. with wild-type [2H]-p50(248−350)/p65(19−321), ...

DISCUSSION

Evidence for interaction between the p65 DNA-binding loop and the IκBα PEST

The conserved NF-κB DNA-binding loop (corresponding to residues 30 to 45 in p65) appears to interact directly with the PEST sequence of IκBα, based on the following evidence. Firstly, the structure of the NF-κB/DNA complex29 showed four residues, R33, R35, Y36 and E39 in p65, mediating direct DNA base-specific contacts. A peptide with sequence derived from the DNA-binding loop of v-Rel (EQPRQRGTRFRY containing the critical residues underlined) has been used successfully to recover DNA binding following IκBα-mediated inhibition.22 These experiments led to the identification of the conserved sequence motif RXXRXRXXC (equivalent to residues 30 to 38 in p65) that appears to be required for IκBα recognition.22 Secondly, an antibody raised against the conserved sequence motif prevented association between c-Rel and IκBα,23 and mutants where residues 280−290 of IκBα were deleted were unable to inhibit DNA binding by p65.23 Thirdly, replacement of the 15-amino acid DNA-binding loop of p65 by a sequence containing three glycines resulted in a 57-fold reduction in the binding affinity between IκBα and p65.16 These results appeared to offer strong evidence for direct interaction between the conserved DNA-binding motif of the Rel proteins and p65 and the PEST sequence of IκBα.

Position of the PEST sequence in the 3D structure

The published X-ray structures of the p65/p50/ IκBα complex13,14 provide an important resource for the understanding of the interactions of NF-κB and IκBα, but have limitations in areas of the complex with backbone flexibility. The two X-ray structures were obtained with very similar protein constructs, but the 1NFI structure14 shows the N-terminal nuclear localization signal portion of p65 in a two-helix structure, while the C-terminus of IκBα is not defined in this structure after residue 282 (283 of the hybrid structure); the last 5 residues of the 69−288 construct are undefined. The 1IKN structure13 does not show the nuclear localization sequence so clearly, but defines coordinates for a longer portion of the C-terminus of IκBα (residues 284−292, sequence E284DEESYDTE292), where the last 10 residues of the 67−302 construct are undefined. Our results show that the C-terminal PEST sequence of IκBα is never really well-structured in solution.20 Even in the 94 kDa complex of IκBα with p50(39−350) and p65(19−321), the resonances of the PEST sequence remain strong and their chemical shifts are located in the central “random coil” region of the 1H-15N TROSY-HSQC spectrum (Figure 6D). The multiple cross peaks observed for D285 and E286 (Figure 6C) and for S283 in the largest complex (Figure 6D) may be an indication of the presence of several different local structures that are exchanging on a slow-to-intermediate time scale. The presence of both the p50 and p65 N-terminal domains restricts the mobility of the PEST sequence, without, however, inducing a single structured conformer. In addition, the observation of significant chemical shift perturbations in D285 and E286 is consistent with the mutation study23 that showed that changing E284, D285 and E286 caused a significant loss of activity; these authors concluded that three consecutive acidic residues are critical for inhibitory activity.

According to both of the X-ray structures, the PEST sequence is located in the vicinity of the p65 N-terminal domain, but does not specifically interact with the DNA contact loop. The structures show that the IκBα molecule uses the bottom of ANK 6 and the C-terminal PEST region to interact with the p65 N-terminal domain. The main interactions are between the highly acidic patch of the PEST sequence: residues E282, E284, D285, E286 and E287, and a basic region of p65 N-terminal domain: residues K28, R30, K79, R158 and H181. Other residues in IκBα, W258, Q278, M279 and P281 also stabilize the interface through polar and van der Waals contacts. It was proposed13 that these interactions promoted allosteric regulation of DNA binding by NF-κB: binding of IκBα changes the orientation of the p65 N-terminal domain, locking the N-terminal domain into a closed conformation that interferes with DNA binding by NF-κB, which is in an “open” configuration in the DNA complex.29 Our NMR studies show chemical shift perturbations, induced mainly by the p65 N-terminal domain, in the same residues of IκBα that would be expected from its position in the X-ray structures. However we observe evidence for an additional interaction not compatible with the X-ray structures: since the binding of the IκBα C-terminus is specifically influenced by mutations in the DNA-binding loop of p65, we infer that this region also recognizes the R33 and R35 residues, whereas R30 is not critical. In the X-ray structure 1IKN,13 these two arginines are located at a distance of 25 to 30 Å from the acidic PEST residues, E284, D285 and E286 (Figure 9). A similar distance is observed in the structure 1NFI14 despite a slightly different orientation of the p65 N-terminal domain. The X-ray studies employed slightly different IκBα constructs (67−302 in 1IKN and 69−288 in INFI), but these differences are unlikely to be the cause of the altered domain orientations since IκBα(67−317) and (67−287) have been reported to be able to recognize NF-κB with equal affinities and kinetics:17,30 the residues after E287 probably play a negligible role in NF-κB binding. We believe that there is significant contact between R33/R35 and the C-terminal PEST sequence of IκBα in solution, since alanine substitution of R33 and R35 is sufficient to reverse the changes in the NMR spectrum of the PEST region that are identified with recognition of p65, and that the orientations in the X-ray structures, possibly manipulated by crystal packing forces, do not truly reflect the structure of the complex in solution.

Figure 9
Ribbon diagram showing the backbone structure of the IκBα/NF-κB complex (PDB 1IKN13). Domains are colored green (IκBα, ANK 3 to residue 287), yellow (p50 C-terminal dimerization domain), orange (p65 C-terminal dimerization ...

Interactions between the IκBα PEST and p65 are specific but weak

The chemical shift perturbations caused by the addition of the p50 and p65 N-terminal domains to the complex of IκBα with the C-terminal dimerization domains are slight (Figure 6), indicating that the interaction between PEST sequence and NF-κB N-terminal domains is a weak one. Comparison of Figures 6B and 6C indicates that the greater contribution to the interaction is made by p65. This result is consistent with the relative binding affinities reported for binding of IκBα(67−287) to p50(248−376)/p65(19−325) (0.039 nM) versus p50(248−350)/p65(190−321) (0.32 nM).30 The dynamic nature of the interaction is quite consistent with previously-reported binding17 and cross-linking16 results.

The binding preference for p65 might be explained by the spatial position and orientation of the PEST tail in the complex. Although the NMR relaxation measurements show that the C-terminus of IκBα is not well-structured even in the largest complex, the hydrogen bond between the side chain of W258 and the backbone carbonyl of Q278 imparts a significant rigidity to the polypeptide in this region, and the backbone of residue Q278 (identified as L277 in 1NFI) is relatively well defined in the X-ray structures. This rigidity limits the conformational space sampled by the C-terminal tail of IκBα to the vicinity of the p65 N-terminal domain. Without breaking the hydrogen bond, the region including the critical acidic side chains E284, D285 and E286 is not free to extend towards the p50 N-terminal domain. It should be noted that there is no direct information on the location of the p50 N-terminal domain, since it is absent from both X-ray structures. Our inference from the increase in NMR linewidth in Figure 6D is that the p50 N-terminal domain is not well docked onto the remainder of the complex, so the preference of the IκBα PEST sequence for the DNA binding sequence of the p65 N-terminal domain might simply be that the distance to the analogous region of p50 is too great.

We recognize that, although IκBα is a general inhibitor for NF-κBs, the IκBα inhibitory effect is probably more complex than the interpretation of results derived only for the p65/p50 heterodimer. All members of the NF-κB family contain a DNA-binding loop with a similar sequence, for instance, Rel B (RGMRFRYEC) and p52 (RGFRFRYGC), but the RelB-p52 heterodimer is not effectively inhibited by the IκBα but rather by the atypical IκB domain present as the C-terminal domain of p100 (the precursor of p52).31

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of different orientations for the N-terminal domain of p65 in the two X-ray structures, together with our observations in solution, which confirm the flexibility of the C-terminus of IκBα after the hydrogen bonded residue Q278, argues against a strong and specific interaction between the PEST sequence and the p65 N-terminal domain. Neither do these observations support the idea that the interaction would be strong enough to promote an allosteric domain rearrangement of the type suggested by Huxford et al.13 to explain the location of the PEST sequence in the X-ray structures. Following the solution results obtained here, we suggest that the role of the PEST sequence in DNA dissociation from NF-κB by IκBα may involve direct electrostatic interactions with the basic DNA-binding loop, leading the dissociation of the p65 N-terminal domain from DNA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Expression and Purification of Proteins

Complexes of differentially labeled IκBα with deuterated p50/p65 heterodimers were prepared by a streamlined method to obtain specific triple-component complexes.20 Briefly, the p50 and p65 NF-κB subunits were coexpressed in E. coli; the subunit with the lower expression yield incorporates a hexahistidine tag at the N-terminus. [2H]-labeled p50 and p65 components and [2H, 13C, 15N] or [2H, 15N]-labeled IκBα are prepared in separate cultures. Cell lysates derived from the two cultures are mixed before purification. The high affinity (Kd ~ 10−9) between IκBα and the NF-κB heterodimer promotes formation of a stable triple-component complex in the mixed lysate. Purification of the correct complex is achieved by passing the mixed cell lysate through a nickel affinity chromatography column followed by gel filtration purification. This procedure allows efficient and precise separation of excellent yields of intact, differentially labeled complexes.

Four vectors of coexpressing p50(248−350)/His-p65(190−321), p50(248−350)/Hisp65(19−321), His-p50(39−350)/p65(190−321) and His-p50(39−350)/p65(19−321), were generated for the NF-κB heterodimer. The p50(248−350) fragment includes the dimerization domain whereas p50(39−350) further includes the N-terminal DNA-binding domain. The p65(190−321) fragment includes the dimerization domain and C-terminal NLS peptide (residues 289−321) and p65(19−321) additionally contains the DNA-binding domain. The coexpression vector for His-p65(19−321)/p50(39−350) gives the largest complex in the previous study;20 this dimer starts to aggregate at protein concentrations > 0.1 mM, probably due to the instability of the p50(39−350) subunit. The alternative construct incorporating the N-terminal hexahistidine tag on the N-terminus of p50(39−350) stabilized the p50 subunit and the p50/p65 heterodimer, and was therefore employed for preparation and characterization of the largest complex.

Proteins were expressed in E. coli strain BL21(DE3). Coexpression of uniformly-deuterated NF-κB heterodimer was carried out in D2O-adapted E. coli cells harboring one of the constructed coexpression vectors in M9 minimal medium in D2O with 0.1 mg/ml carbenicillin at 37°C. NF-κB showed dramatically reduced expression yield in D2O medium, especially for the construct of His-p50(39−350)/p65(19−321), the largest complex. The medium was adjusted to increase yield by doubling the ingredients, including NH4Cl, glucose and other salts, to allow the cell culture to grow to high density. Cultures were routinely grown to OD600 ~ 1.2 and induced by 0.5 mM isopropyl-1-thio-β-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG). After an additional 24 hours of induction at 15°C, the cells grew to OD600 of ~ 2.5 and were harvested by centrifugation (6,000 g). The yield was as high as two-fold compared to the culture in regular D2O M9 medium. Expression of [2H, 13C, 15N]-labeled IκBα(67−287) was carried out in regular M9 minimal medium in D2O supplemented with 15NH4Cl (0.5 g/L), 15NH4SO4 (1 g/L) and 2H, 13C-labeled glucose (2 g/L). The culture was induced at OD600 of 0.6 by 0.2 mM IPTG and with additional 24 hours incubation at 15°C.

Protein complexes purified to homogeneity by the streamlined method outlined above were exchanged into NMR buffer (25 mM Tris pH 7.5/50 mM NaCl/1 mM EDTA/ 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) in 90% H2O/10% D2O). The purities of the final protein products were judged to be higher than 95 % by SDS-PAGE. The sample 2H enrichment is estimated to higher than 90% in IκBα and 70 % in NF-κB, adjudged by a 1D NMR spectrum. Sample concentrations of 0.3 ~ 0.5 mM were used throughout the study, except for the largest complex, IκBα/His-p50(39−350)/p65(19−321), where 0.15 mM was used.

Mutants to probe sites of IκBα binding included p50(248−350)/His-p65(19−321, R30A/R33A/R35A), p50(248−350)/His-p65(19−321, R33A/R35A) and p50(248−350)/His-p65(19−321, R30A), where arginine residues in the DNA-binding interface of the p65 N-terminal domain were substituted with alanines. The mutants were introduced by using the Quickchange site-directed mutagenesis methodology with the properly designed mutagenic primers and the coexpression plasmid, p50(248−350)/His-p65(19−321). The solution behavior of the mutants is similar to the wild type protein; the same procedures were therefore adopted for preparing the complexes containing mutant proteins.

NMR experiments and structural characterization

Resonances of bound IκBα(67−275) were assigned using [2H, 13C, 15N]- IκBα(67−275) complexed with [2H]-p50(248−350)/[2H]-p65(190−321). NMR spectra were acquired at 25°C on a Bruker Avance800 equipped with cryoprobe. A TROSY-HNCA spectrum32 was acquired for the assignment, with data size = 2048 (t3) × 64 (t2) × 84 (t1) complex points, number of scans = 40 and 1.5s delay time between each scan.

To elucidate the structure of IκBα C-terminal PEST region, we performed 3D 15N-edited NOESY-TROSY spectra33,34 for [2H, 15N]- IκBα(67−287) in complex with [2H]-p50(248−350)/p65(190−321); the sample contained 0.5 mM protein in NMR buffer. The spectra were acquired with 32 scans per FID, 2048 (t3) × 64 (t2) × 144 (t1) complex points, 1.5 s delay time between each scan, and mixing times of 100 ms and 200 ms on the Bruker DRX600 and Avance900 spectrometers, respectively. Data were processed using NMRpipe35 and analyzed using NMRView.36 Backbone NH-NH NOE cross-peaks were assigned manually based on the backbone 15N, NH chemical shifts reported previously.20

Backbone dihedral angles of IκBα residues G270 to E282 were predicted by the program TALOS26 by analysis of 13Cα, 13Cβ, 13CO and 15N chemical shifts, derived from the backbone TROSY triple-resonance experiments, including HNCA, HN(CO)CA, HNCACB, HN(CO)CACB and HNCO.32 The 1H chemical shifts were referenced to 2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentane-5-sulfonate (DSS) at 0 ppm and the 15N and 13C chemical shifts were referenced using consensus ratios of 0.101329118 for 15N/1H and 0.251449530 for 13C/1H.37 The 13C chemical shifts were further corrected for isotope effects.38,39 Only the TALOS predictions that are identified as “good” were included in the comparison.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Euvel Manlapaz for excellent technical assistance and Gerard Kroon for assistance with NMR experiments. Drs. Peter Wright and Elizabeth Komives gave valuable advice and commentary throughout this project. We thank Drs Betsy Komives and Gourisankar Ghosh for a critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by grant GM71862 from the National Institutes of Health.

Funding: GM71862

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Reference List

1. Gilmore TD. Introduction to NF-κB: players, pathways, perspectives. Oncogene. 2006;25:6680–6684. [PubMed]
2. Hoffmann A, Natoli G, Ghosh G. Transcriptional regulation via the NF-κB signaling module. Oncogene. 2006;25:6706–6716. [PubMed]
3. Hayden MS, Ghosh S. Shared principles in NF-κB signaling. Cell. 2008;132:344–362. [PubMed]
4. Baldwin AS. The NF-κB and I-κB proteins: New discoveries and insights. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 1996;14:649–683. [PubMed]
5. Baeuerle PA, Baltimore D. NF-κB: ten years after. Cell. 1996;87:13–20. [PubMed]
6. Sen R, Baltimore D. Inducibility of κ immunoglobulin enhancer-binding protein NF-κB by a posttranslational mechanism. Cell. 1986;47:921–928. [PubMed]
7. Hayden MS, Ghosh S. Signaling to NF-κB. Genes Dev. 2004;18:2195–2224. [PubMed]
8. Beg AA, Finco TS, Nantermet PV, Baldwin AS,, Jr. Tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-1 lead to phosphorylation and loss of IκBα: a mechanism for NF-κB activation. Mol. Cell Biol. 1993;13:3301–3310. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Cordle SR, Donald R, Read MA, Hawiger J. Lipopolysaccharide induces phosphorylation of MAD3 and activation of c-Rel and related NF-κB proteins in human monocytic THP-1 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:11803–11810. [PubMed]
10. Grilli M, Chiu JJ, Lenardo MJ. NF-κB and Rel: participants in a multiform transcriptional regulatory system. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1993;143:1–62. [PubMed]
11. Ghosh S, May MJ, Kopp EB. NF-κB and Rel proteins: evolutionarily conserved mediators of immune responses. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 1998;16:225–60. [PubMed]
12. Mathes E, O'Dea E, Hoffmann A, Ghosh G. NF-κB dictates the degradation pathway of IκB. EMBO J. 2008;27:1357–1367. [PubMed]
13. Huxford T, Huang DB, Malek S, Ghosh G. The crystal structure of the IκBα/NF-κB complex reveals mechanisms of NF-κB inactivation. Cell. 1998;95:759–770. [PubMed]
14. Jacobs MD, Harrison SC. Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB complex. Cell. 1998;95:749–758. [PubMed]
15. Rogers S, Wells R, Rechsteiner M. Amino acid sequences common to rapidly degraded proteins: the PEST hypothesis. Science. 1986;234:364–368. [PubMed]
16. Malek S, Huxford T, Ghosh G. IκBα functions through direct contacts with the nuclear localization signals and the DNA binding sequences of NF-κB. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:25427–25435. [PubMed]
17. Phelps CB, Sengchanthalangsy LL, Huxford T, Ghosh G. Mechanism of IκBα binding to NF-κB dimers. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:29840–29846. [PubMed]
18. Croy CH, Bergqvist S, Huxford T, Ghosh G, Komives EA. Biophysical characterization of the free IκBα ankyrin repeat domain in solution. Protein Sci. 2004;13:1767–1777. [PubMed]
19. Truhlar SM, Croy CH, Torpey JW, Koeppe JR, Komives EA. Solvent accessibility of protein surfaces by amide H/2H exchange MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2006;17:1490–1497. [PubMed]
20. Sue SC, Cervantes C, Komives EA, Dyson HJ. Transfer of flexibility between ankyrin repeats in IκBα upon formation of the NF-κB complex. J. Mol. Biol. 2008;380:917–931. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Truhlar SM, Torpey JW, Komives EA. Regions of IκBα that are critical for its inhibition of NF-κB.DNA interaction fold upon binding to NF-κB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:18951–18956. [PubMed]
22. Kumar S, Gelinas C. IκBα-mediated inhibition of v-Rel DNA binding requires direct interaction with the RXXRXRXXC Rel/κB DNA-binding motif. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1993;90:8962–8966. [PubMed]
23. Ernst MK, Dunn LL, Rice NR. The PEST-like sequence of IkBα is responsible for inhibition of DNA binding but not for cytoplasmic retention of c-Rel or RelA homodimers. Mol. Cell Biol. 1995;15:872–882. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Malek S, Chen Y, Huxford T, Ghosh G. IκBβ, but not IκBα, functions as a classical cytoplasmic inhibitor of NF-κB dimers by masking both NF-κB nuclear localization sequences in resting cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:45225–45235. [PubMed]
25. Baeuerle PA. IκB-NF-κB structures: at the interface of inflammation control. Cell. 1998;95:729–731. [PubMed]
26. Cornilescu G, Delaglio F, Bax A. Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology. J. Biomol. NMR. 1999;13:289–302. [PubMed]
27. Bergqvist S, Ghosh G, Komives EA. The IkBa/NF-κB complex has two hot spots, one at either end of the interface. Protein Sci. 2008;17:2051–2058. [PubMed]
28. Truhlar SM, Komives EA. LRR domain folding: just put a cap on it! Structure. 2008;16:655–657. [PubMed]
29. Chen FE, Huang DB, Chen YQ, Ghosh G. Crystal structure of p50/p65 heterodimer of transcription factor NF-κB bound to DNA. Nature. 1998;391:410–413. [PubMed]
30. Bergqvist S, Croy CH, Kjaergaard M, Huxford T, Ghosh G, Komives EA. Thermodynamics reveal that helix four in the NLS of NF-κB p65 anchors IκBα, forming a very stable complex. J. Mol. Biol. 2006;360:421–434. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Dobrzanski P, Ryseck RP, Bravo R. Specific inhibition of RelB/p52 transcriptional activity by the C-terminal domain of p100. Oncogene. 1995;10:1003–1007. [PubMed]
32. Salzmann M, Wider G, Pervushin K, Senn H, Wüthrich K. TROSY-type triple-resonance experiments for sequential NMR assignments of large proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121:844–848.
33. Salzmann M, Pervushin K, Wider G, Senn H, Wüthrich K. NMR assignment and secondary structure determination of an octameric 110 kDa protein using TROSY in triple resonance experiments. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:7543–7548.
34. Pervushin K, Braun D, Fernández C, Wüthrich K. [15N,1H]/[13C,1H]-TROSY for simultaneous detection of backbone 15N-1H, aromatic 13C-1H and side-chain 15N-1H2 correlations in large proteins. J. Biomol. NMR. 2000;17:195–202. [PubMed]
35. Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Guang Z, Pfeifer J, Bax A. NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J. Biomol. NMR. 1995;6:277–293. [PubMed]
36. Johnson BA, Blevins RA. NMRView: A computer program for the visualization and analysis of NMR data. J. Biomol. NMR. 1994;4:604–613. [PubMed]
37. Wishart DS, Bigam CG, Yao J, Abildgaard F, Dyson HJ, Oldfield E, Markley JL, Sykes BD. 1H, 13C and 15N chemical shift referencing in biomolecular NMR. J. Biomol. NMR. 1995;6:135–140. [PubMed]
38. Metzler WJ, Constantine KL, Friedrichs MS, Bell AJ, Ernst EG, Lavoie TB, Mueller L. Characterization of the three-dimensional solution structure of human profilin: 1H, 13C, and 15N NMR assignments and global folding pattern. Biochemistry. 1993;32:13818–13829. [PubMed]
39. Gardner KH, Rosen MK, Kay LE. Global folds of highly deuterated, methyl-protonated proteins by multidimensional NMR. Biochemistry. 1997;36:1389–1401. [PubMed]
40. Wishart DS, Bigam CG, Holm A, Hodges RS, Sykes BD. 1H, 13C and 15N random coil NMR chemical shifts of the common amino acids: I. Investigations of nearest neighbor effects. J. Biomol. NMR. 1995;5:67–81. [PubMed]
41. Schwarzinger S, Kroon GJA, Foss TR, Wright PE, Dyson HJ. Random coil chemical shifts in acidic 8 M urea: implementation of random coil chemical shift data in NMRView. J. Biomol. NMR. 2000;18:43–48. [PubMed]