This issue of Arthritis Research & Therapy
includes an important article on rheumatoid cachexia by Elkan and colleagues [1
] demonstrating that cachexia remains common in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is associated with a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome and hypertension, which may contribute to the excess mortality of RA. Weight loss and muscle wasting are common features of untreated RA, as originally described by James Paget in the 19th century [2
]. However, rheumatoid cachexia, from the Greek meaning 'bad condition', was not recognized as a common problem among patients with RA until relatively recently [3
]. Rheumatoid cachexia refers to the loss of fat-free mass, predominantly skeletal muscle, that occurs in RA. Loss of body weight does not always occur; in fact, loss of body fat-free mass is often accompanied by increased fat mass and stable body weight. Rheumatoid cachexia may affect up to two-thirds of all patients with RA [3
]. Elkan and colleagues, using a more conservative definition of both low fat-free mass and high fat mass, found that about a quarter of their patients were cachectic.
Evidence from cancer, heart failure, and HIV infection strongly points to weight loss as an independent predictor of poor outcome (reviewed in [5
]). The average loss of fat-free mass among patients with RA is between 13% and 15% – approximately one-third of the maximum survivable loss of fat-free mass [6
]. Loss of fat-free mass and higher fat mass are each associated with greater disability in RA [7
], and low body weight (that is, both fat and fat-free tissue) in patients with RA is associated with threefold higher mortality [8
]. Thus, rheumatoid cachexia may be an important contributor to increased morbidity and premature mortality in RA.
A number of factors are likely involved in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid cachexia, including 'sarcoactive' cytokines, energy expenditure, protein metabolism, physical activity levels, and hormones. For example, the inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and IL-1β are centrally involved in the pathogenesis of RA, but, in addition, these cytokines exert a powerful influence on whole-body protein and energy metabolism. Other sarcoactive molecules include IL-6, IFN-γ, transforming growth factor-β1, and MyoD [9
]. Patients with RA have higher rates of whole-body protein breakdown compared with young and elderly healthy subjects, and, furthermore, protein breakdown is directly associated with TNF-α production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells [10
]. More recent research has suggested that skeletal muscle protein loss is dependent upon the signaling activities of both TNF-α and IFN-γ, and that nuclear factor kappa B activity is needed for these cytokines to induce muscle damage [11
]. Nevertheless, although anti-TNF therapy improves insulin resistance in RA, it does not seem to reverse rheumatoid cachexia [12
Patients with RA also have reduced physical activity as a result of joint pain and stiffness, metabolic changes leading to loss of muscle mass and strength, and simple disuse, perhaps related to general cautiousness with regard to physical activity. While the role of the growth hormone (GH)-insulin-like growth factor 1 axis in altering muscle mass and strength during healthy aging is not fully understood, GH is known to decline with aging, and has been suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of sarcopenia (age-related muscle loss) [13
]. However, persistent GH deficiency does not appear to be the cause of rheumatoid cachexia [13
]. Like GH, insulin is a potent anabolic hormone, and insulin resistance has been shown to occur in inflammatory arthritis [14
]. It is possible that the metabolic milieu created by a state of insulin resistance may permit cytokine-driven muscle loss, although this remains speculative.
Elkan and colleagues [1
] also made two other important contributions to our understanding of rheumatoid cachexia. First, by demonstrating that dietary fat intake was not an independent risk factor for this complication, they added support to the notion that cachexia cannot be cured by dietary intervention alone. Second, the demonstration of increased metabolic syndrome in patients with rheumatoid cachexia underlines the complex interplay between fat mass, lean mass, and insulin resistance in RA. In addition, Elkan and colleagues' finding of lower levels of potentially protective antibodies against cardiovascular disease offers an intriguing hypothesis as to the mechanism of accelerated atherosclerosis in RA. As rheumatologists, we all properly focus on the joints and their protection in RA, but we should step back and evaluate the muscle and fat mass as well, and seek to protect our patients from the metabolic complications of RA in addition to its rheumatic sequelae.