PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC May 20, 2009.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2684685
NIHMSID: NIHMS81488
GABA Regulates Excitatory Synapse Formation in the Neocortex via NMDA Receptor Activation
Doris D. Wang and Arnold R. Kriegstein
Institute for Regeneration Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143
Correspondence should be addressed to Doris D. Wang, University of California, San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, HSW 1201, Box 0525, San Francisco, CA 94143. E-mail: Doris.wang/at/ucsf.edu
The development of a balance between excitatory and inhibitory synapses is a critical process in the generation and maturation of functional circuits. Accumulating evidence suggests that neuronal activity plays an important role in achieving such a balance in the developing cortex, but the mechanism that regulates this process is unknown. During development, GABA, the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter in adults, excites neurons as a result of high expression of the Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporter (NKCC1). Using NKCC1 RNA interference knockdown in vivo, we show that GABA-induced depolarization is necessary for proper excitatory synapse formation and dendritic development of newborn cortical neurons. Blocking NKCC1 with the diuretic bumetanide during development leads to similar persistent changes in cortical circuitry in the adult. Interestingly, expression of a voltage-independent NMDA receptor rescues the failure of NKCC1 knockdown neurons to develop excitatory AMPA transmission, indicating that GABA depolarization cooperates with NMDA receptor activation to regulate excitatory synapse formation. Our study identifies an essential role for GABA in the synaptic integration of newborn cortical neurons and suggests an activity-dependent mechanism for achieving the balance between excitation and inhibition in the developing cortex.
Keywords: GABA, GABAA receptor, AMPA receptor, NMDA receptor, synapse development, synaptogenesis, cortical circuit, activity-dependent synaptogenesis
The development of cortical circuitry is a dynamic and complex process whereby newborn neurons must generate precise connections with surrounding neurons to maintain the balance between excitation and inhibition. Of particular interest is the role of neurotransmitters in the regulation of activity-dependent mechanisms of synaptogenesis. During corticogenesis, the principal adult inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA influences the processes of cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation (Barbin et al., 1993; LoTurco et al., 1995; Heck et al., 2007). GABAergic signaling precedes glutamatergic signaling in the developing neocortex because newborn neurons express GABAA receptors (GABAARs) and receive GABAergic inputs from striatally derived interneurons before forming glutamatergic synapses with each other (Owens et al., 1999; Hennou et al., 2002). GABAergic signaling is an ideal regulator of activity-dependent neural circuitry formation for two reasons. First, GABA gates a chloride channel and can either depolarize or hyperpolarize a cell depending on the developmentally regulated expression of Cltransporters (Delpire, 2000; Owens and Kriegstein, 2002). Second, GABA can excite neurons without directly producing excitotoxicity because the relatively negative GABA reversal potential and large Cl conductance clamps the membrane potential to prevent long activation of voltage-gated channels that might engender toxic amounts of Ca2+ influx. Using strategies to alter the Cl gradient in immature neurons, recent studies suggest that GABA-mediated depolarization regulates the synaptic integration of adult-generated hippocampal granule cells as well as formation of glutamatergic synapses in cortical neurons in vitro and in Xenopus tectal neurons in vivo (Chudotvorova et al., 2005; Akerman and Cline, 2006; Ge et al., 2006). The mechanism of the influence of GABA on excitatory synapse development is unknown, and whether the same process applies to developing cortical neurons remains to be answered.
To investigate the role of GABA in synapse development in the neocortex, we aimed to abolish GABA-mediated excitation in cortical excitatory neurons before and during synapse formation. The effect of GABA on membrane polarity depends on the Clgradient created by the expression of Na+-K+-2Cl cotrans-porter (NKCC) and K+-Cl cotransporter (KCC). NKCC1 imports Cl and is expressed from the embryonic stage until the first postnatal week, whereas KCC2 exports Cl and is weakly expressed at birth and upregulated as the brain matures (Plotkin et al., 1997; Rivera et al., 1999; Li et al., 2002). The temporal expression patterns of these two transporters correspond to the switch of GABA from being excitatory to inhibitory during the first few weeks of rodent postnatal life (Delpire, 2000). Here, using in utero electroporation of a short hairpin RNA (shRNA) sequence against Nkcc1, we describe a critical role for GABA-induced excitation in the development of excitatory cortical synapses. Blocking NKCC1 with bumetanide during a critical period in development also leads to a failure to develop excitatory synapses that persists to maturity. Furthermore, we provide evidence that GABA-mediated depolarization through GABAAR activation can cooperate with NMDA receptors to allow the newly formed network to achieve a balance between excitation and inhibition. We thus demonstrate that an inhibitory neurotransmitter in the adult can regulate the development of excitatory synapses at early stages of cortical circuit formation.
Animals
Timed-pregnant Swiss-Webster dams were obtained from Simonsen Laboratories. All manipulations were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the University of California San Francisco Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Construction, in utero injection, and electroporation of shRNA-expressing plasmids
Green fluorescent protein (GFP) and shRNA oligonucleotides were inserted into pLLox3.7 for coexpression under the U6 promoter (Lois et al., 2002). The following previously characterized target sequences were used: ACACACTTGTCCTGGGATT (Nkcc1-shRNA); AGTTCCAGTACGGCTCCAA (DsRed-shRNA) (Ge et al., 2006). For NR1 knockdown experiments, shRNA plasmids were provided by E. Hueske (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA). The small interfering RNA sequence was screened through GGCAGUAAACCAGGCCAAUTT (Ambion) and cloned into Topo2.1 vector for expression under the U6 promoter. Plasmids were introduced into the in vivo developing cortex by intraventricular injection and electroporation (Saito and Nakatsuji, 2001). Intraventricular injections were performed in embryonic day 15 (E15) timed-pregnant Swiss-Webster mice as described previously (Noctor et al., 2001). Electroporations were performed using an Electro Square Porator ECM830 (Genetronics; five pulses, 45 mV, 100 ms, 1 s interval). One microliter of DNA was injected per brain at the following concentrations: shRNA constructs at 1.5 µg/µl; rescue constructs at molar ratios of 2:1 (Nkcc1:Nkcc1-shRNA), 2:1 (YFP: Nkcc1-shRNA), 1:2 (YFP:NR2Amut), 1:2 (YFP:NR2A), and 1:1 (NR2Amut:Nkcc1-shRNA).
Immunohistochemistry and confocal imaging
Coronal brain sections (14 µm thick) were prepared from electroporated brains of neonatal mice after transcardial perfusion with PBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde. For NKCC1 staining, the sections were pretreated with 1% SDS and 8% β-mercaptoethanol in PBS for 15 min as described previously (Ge et al., 2006). Sections were blocked in a solution containing 2% gelatin, 10% serum, and 1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 2 h. Sections were incubated overnight in the following primary antibodies: mouse anti-NKCC1 (T4, 1:200; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), rabbit anti-KCC2 (1:400; Upstate Biotechnology), and chicken anti-GFP (1:500; Aves Labs). Secondary antibodies included Alexa 488/568 conjugates (Invitrogen) or Cy3/Cy5 conjugates (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Images were acquired on an Olympus Fluoview 300 and a Leica SP5 laser-scanning confocal microscope. Images of NKCC1 staining represent collapsed 3 µm stacks collected at 1 µm steps. Images were analyzed using Photoshop 7.0 (Adobe Systems).
Cell iontophoresis and morphological analysis
Electroporated postnatal mice were perfused as described previously, and 300-µm-thick coronal sections were cut using a Vibratome (Leica VT1000S) and stored in PBS. GFP+ pyramidal neurons were visualized by differential interference contrast (DIC) and fluorescence microscopy (Olympus BX50WI). Sharp microelectrodes were pulled from borosilicate glass capillaries to ~70 MΩ (measured with 1 m KCl). The electrode tip was filled with 1% DiI in 100% ethanol. The rest of the electrode was then filled with 100% ethanol. After penetrating the cell body with the electrode, dye was expelled by 1–50 nA positive current using the Master-8 pulse generator and Iso-Flex electrostimulator (A.M.P.I.) for 1–3 min depending on cell size. Sections were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight. For morphology analysis of the GFP+ DiI-filled pyramidal neurons, three-dimensional reconstructions of the cell body and dendritic processes were made from Z-series stacks of confocal images. The images were collapsed, the cell body was semiautomatically traced with NIH ImageJ (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/), and the area of the traced soma was calculated. Quantifications of primary dendrites were made from the three-dimensional reconstructed images and Z-series stacks. Spine densities were calculated by counting the number of spines on a high-magnification collapsed Z-stack and dividing the total spine by the length of the dendrite. Spine lengths were calculated using the measuring function in NIH ImageJ. The distributions of the primary dendrite number of each individual neuron under different conditions are shown as cumulative distribution plots (see Fig. 4C). A total of 25 neurons from four animals injected with Nkcc1-shRNA and 6 neurons from three animals injected with DsRed-shRNA were analyzed at 2 weeks. A total of 30 neurons from four animals injected with Nkcc1-shRNA and 19 neurons from four animals injected with DsRed-shRNA were analyzed at 3 weeks. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) between control and experimental groups was assessed using the Student’s t test.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Nkcc1-shRNA expression disrupts morphology of cortical neurons. A, Confocal three-dimensional reconstruction of dendrites of control or Nkcc1-shRNA-expressing cortical neurons at 2 or 3 weeks postnatal. The left panels show the flattened stack of a neuron, (more ...)
Electrophysiology
Electroporated postnatal mice at different ages were anesthetized and processed for slice preparation as described previously (Owens et al., 1996). The brains were quickly removed into ice-cold CSF (ACSF) containing (in mm) 124 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2 PO4, 1 MgSO4, 2 CaCl2, 26 NaHCO3, and 10 glucose oxygenated with 95% O2–5% CO2, pH 7.4. Brains from postnatal day 0 (P0) to P5 animals were embedded in 4% low-melting-point agarose in ACSF, hardened on ice, and cut into coronal slices (300 µm thick) using a Vibratome (Leica VT1000S). Brains from older animals were cut directly on the vibratome, and sections were confined to the sensorimotor regions of the cortex. Electrophysiological recordings were obtained at room temperature from sections continuously superfused with oxygenated ACSF. GFP+ pyramidal neurons were visualized by DIC and fluorescence microscopy and were identified by their green fluorescence, location within layer II/III of cortex, neuronal morphology, and current profile in response to 20 mV voltage steps. Microelectrodes (6–8 MΩ resistance) were pulled from borosilicate glass capillaries and filled with the following solution (in mm): 130 KCl, 5 NaCl, 0.4 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, pH 7.3, 11 EGTA, and 0.1% Lucifer yellow for the majority of the recordings. For perforated patch recordings, the gramicidin stock (10 mg/ml in DMSO) was diluted in the internal pipette solution above to a final concentration of 25 µg/ml. The tip of the pipette was filled with the gramicidin-containing solution, and the rest was filled with normal internal pipette solution. Gigaohm seals were made, and cells were applied in voltage ramps from −140 to +100 mV every 20 s to monitor current changes. After ramp currents stabilized, 3 s focal application of 100 µm GABA (Research Biochemicals) was applied using the DAD superperfusion system (ALA Scientific) to activate GABAARs on the GFP+ neurons. Voltage ramps from −140 to +100 mV were applied before and after GABA application. The resulting currents were then subtracted, and the difference were plotted as I–V curves (see Fig. 1B). E GABA was determined for each cell as x-intercept of I–V curves. To characterize spontaneous postsynaptic currents (sPSCs), 5–20 min of whole-cell recordings were made using a Double Patch-clamp EPC9/2 (HEKA Elektronik) at 10 kHz. The series and input resistances were monitored, and only those that changed <20% during experiments were used for data analysis. Traces were analyzed using Igor Pro or MiniAnalysis (Synaptsoft) programs. Each synaptic event was manually selected based on rise time, amplitude, and decay properties. Additional drugs were added as indicated with the following estimated final concentrations: bicuculline methiodide (100 µm; Sigma), DNQX (20 µm; Tocris), and tetrodotoxin (TTx; 0.5 µm; Calbiochem). To characterize NMDA channel currents, outside-out patches were formed by slowly pulling the pipettes out of the slice after whole-cell recording. NMDA (30 µm) or glutamate (100 µm; Sigma) was applied to patches, and recordings were performed in ACSF containing TTx (0.5 µm), bicuculline methiodide (50 µm), DNQX (10 µm), and glycine (40 µm;, Sigma). Unless otherwise noted, the holding potential for voltage-clamp recordings was −70 mV. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) between control and experimental groups was assessed using a two-tailed Student’s t test.
Figure 1
Figure 1
In vivo knockdown of NKCC1 alters GABA reversal potential of newborn neurons. A, P0 cortical neurons electroporated with plasmids expressing GFP and shRNAs against either DsRed (control) or Nkcc1. Expression of Nkcc1-shRNA, but not the control shRNA ( (more ...)
Acute knockdown of NKCC1 in newborn cortical neurons
To study the role of GABA in the development of cortical circuitry, we used an RNA interference (RNAi) strategy to knock-down the expression of NKCC1, a Cl importer responsible for GABA-induced depolarization in immature neurons (Delpire, 2000). We performed in utero electroporation of plasmids coexpressing GFP and a previously characterized shRNA against Nkcc1 in 15-d-old embryonic mice, during the birth of mid- to upper-layer cortical neurons (Ge et al., 2006). In utero RNAi provides both temporal and spatial control over loss of function and bypasses the pitfalls of potential genetic compensations often observed in knock-out animals. To test the ability of the shRNAs to knockdown endogenous NKCC1 protein in newborn neurons in the developing cortex, we performed immunohistochemistry of GFP+ cells in electroporated cortices of neonatal (P0) mice.Nkcc1-shRNA, but not control shRNA, reduced the expression of NKCC1 in immature cortical neurons without affecting the expression of KCC2, a Cl exporter expressed after birth and maintained through adulthood to make GABA hyperpolarizing (Fig. 1A). We further tested the efficacy of Nkcc1-shRNA by gramicidin-perforated patch recording of electroporated neurons at P0 to measure the intracellular Cl concentration without perturbing the Cl gradient. The GABA reversal potential (EGABA) was significantly more negative in Nkcc1-shRNA-expressing neurons than in control neocortical neurons (DsRed-shRNA, −40.29 ± 3.10 mV; Nkcc1-shRNA, −71.17 ±, 3.77 mV; p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1B,D). Given the unchanged resting membrane potential of electroporated cortical neurons at P0 (DsRed-shRNA, −54.75 ± 1.18 mV; Nkcc1-shRNA, −55.45 ± 2.01 mV), GABA hyperpolarized cells expressing Nkcc1-shRNA, thus validating the effectiveness of RNAi knockdown to abolish GABA-induced depolarization (Fig. 1D).
GABA regulates synaptic integration of newborn cortical neurons
To test the ability of newborn cortical neurons to develop synaptic connections in the absence of GABA-induced depolarization in vivo, we recorded sPSCs in electro-porated GFP+ neurons at a holding potential of −70 mV in the presence of TTx (0.5 µm). As newborn cortical neurons mature, they sequentially receive inhibitory and excitatory synaptic inputs that can be measured in the form of sPSCs (Owens et al., 1999; Tyzio et al., 1999; Hennou et al., 2002). In the first postnatal week, control GFP+ neurons exhibited few sPSCs, all of which were blocked by bicuculline and therefore GABAergic (Fig. 2A,B). However, we could not detect any sPSCs in Nkcc1-shRNA-expressing cells at this time (Fig. 2A,B). By the second and third postnatal week, the total frequencies of sPSCs in control cells had increased significantly (Fig. 2A,B), yet Nkcc1-shRNA neurons had sPSC frequencies at 11 and 42% of those observed in respective control cells, indicating defects in synaptic integration of Nkcc1-shRNA-expressing neurons (t test; DsRed-shRNA vs Nkcc1-shRNA; 2 weeks: 1.93 ± 0.25 vs 0.22 ± 0.05 Hz, p < 0.0001; 3 weeks: 3.62 ± 0.64 vs 1.51 ± 0.36 Hz, p = 0.0053) (Fig. 2C).
Figure 2
Figure 2
GABA regulates synaptic integration of cortical neurons and balance of excitatory and inhibitory inputs. A, B, Current traces of sPSCs in GFP+ neurons at 1–3 weeks postnatal in cells expressing control shRNA (A) or Nkcc1-shRNA (B). Traces on the (more ...)
We next investigated the type of synaptic transmission that the newborn cortical neurons receive after integration of cortical circuitry. Previous studies have shown that cortical neurons undergo the sequential development of GABA, followed by AMPA synapses (Chen et al., 1995; Khazipov et al., 2001; Hennou et al., 2002). To isolate the AMPA and GABAergic sPSCs, we bath applied the GABAAR antagonist bicuculline methiodide (100 µm) and non-NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist DNQX (20 µm), respectively (Fig. 2A). In control GFP+ cells, the newborn neurons followed the previously characterized sequential development of GABA – and AMPA – synaptic innervation, whereby all sPSCs were GABAergic in the first postnatal week, but AMPA-mediated sPSCs appeared by 2 weeks and increased in frequency by 3 weeks (Fig. 2A) (Owens et al., 1999; Tyzio et al., 1999; Hennou et al., 2002). In contrast, in the Nkcc1-shRNA-expressing neurons, there was marked reduction in the frequency of AMPA-mediated synaptic transmission at 2 and 3 weeks (t test; DsRed- shRNA vs Nkcc1-shRNA; 2 weeks: 0.86 ± 0.14 vs 0.06 ± 0.03 Hz, p < 0.0001; 3 weeks: 1.61 ± 0.39 vs 0.16 ± 0.10 Hz, p = 0.0005) (Fig. 2D). The fractions of total synaptic currents that are AMPA mediated in Nkcc1-knockdown neurons were significantly reduced compared with that of controls (t test; DsRed-shRNA vs Nkcc1-shRNA; 2 weeks: 0.46 ± 0.08 vs 0.16 ± 0.05, p = 0.0046; 3 weeks: 0.55 ± 0.08 vs 0.09 ± 0.05, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2D). Interestingly, the frequency of GABA sPSCs in knockdown neurons was significantly reduced at 2 weeks but reached normal levels by 3 weeks (t test; DsRed-shRNA vs Nkcc1-shRNA; 2 weeks: 0.70 ± 0.15 vs 0.20 ± 0.04 Hz, p = 0.0042; 3 weeks: 1.87 ± 0.48 vs 1.55 ± 0.61 Hz, p = 0.6885) (Fig. 2E). In fact, nearly all of the sPSCs at 2 and 3 weeks, 92 and 81%, respectively, were GABAergic in Nkcc1-shRNA neurons (t test; DsRed-shRNA vs Nkcc1-shRNA; 2 weeks: 0.39 ± 0.07 vs 0.92 ± 0.13, p = 0.0013; 3 weeks: 0.61 ± 0.02 vs 0.81 ± 0.05, p = 0.0018) (Fig. 2E). The change in sPSC frequency was not accompanied by a significant change in the mean amplitude of sPSCs (t test; DsRed-shRNA vs Nkcc1-shRNA; 1 week: 2.4 ± 1.3 vs 1.1 ± 0.8 pA, p = 0.3575; 2 weeks: 23.5 ± 5.7 vs 16.4 ± 3. 0 pA, p = 0.2592; 3 weeks: 27.3 ± 6.4 vs 34.0 ± 7.1 pA, p = 0.5112) (supplemental Fig. 1A–C, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material), suggesting that there were no general defects in receptor expression at synapses.
To determine the specificity of the RNAi knockdown, we attempted to rescue the reduced AMPA current phenotype by electroporating the Nkcc1-shRNA together with a plasmid expressing the wild-type mouse Nkcc1 cDNA. Whereas coelectroporation of Nkcc1-shRNA with a control yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)-expressing plasmid had no effect on the Nkcc1-shRNA pheno-type, expression of the wild-type Nkcc1 in the same molar ratio as the control conditions rescued the fraction of AMPA- and GABA-mediated sPSCS both at 2 weeks (t test; Nkcc1-shRNA vs Nkcc1; AMPA: 0.16 ± 0.05 vs 0.50 ± 0.06, p = 0.0003; GABA: 0.92 ± 0.13 vs 0.46 ± 0.05, p = 0.0054) and 3 weeks (t test; Nkcc1-shRNA vs Nkcc1; AMPA: 0.12 ± 0.06 vs 0.68 ± 0.07, p < 0.0001; GABA: 0.81 ± 0.05 vs 0.42 ± 0.08, p = 0.0014) (supplemental Fig. 2A,B, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). Together, these findings indicate that reducing GABA-induced excitatory signaling in neurons during development results in defective synaptic development. Our findings also indicate that this perturbation is specifically attributable to reduced excitatory input and altered relative proportions of excitatory and inhibitory inputs on individual neurons.
Blocking NKCC1 with bumetanide disrupts excitatory synapse development in the cortex
Bumetanide, a selective NKCC1 inhibitor, has been demonstrated to suppress certain forms of epileptiform activity in vitro and in vivo, presumably by attenuating the depolarizing effect of GABA (Dzhala et al., 2005; Kilb et al., 2007). We gave daily intraperitoneal injections of either bumetanide (0.2 mg/kg) or PBS saline to pregnant dams and their pups from E15 until P7 to assess the effects of bumetanide on the developing nervous system. Gramicidin-perforated patch recording of P0 cortical neurons from either bumetanide- or saline-injected mice confirmed that bumetanide could shift EGABA toward a more hyperpolarizing potential (t test; control vs bumetanide; −40.94 ± 2.76 vs −66.07 ± 3.87 mV; p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3A–C). Recording sPSCs in layer II/III cortical neurons from bumetanide-treated and control mice showed that the overall sPSC frequency was not significantly changed at 2 weeks (t test; control vs bumetanide; 1.8 ± 0.2 vs 1.4 ± 0.2 Hz; p = 0.1283) but was significantly decreased at 4 weeks (t test; control vs bumetanide; 4.3 ± 0.5 vs 3.1 ± 0.4 Hz; p = 0.0141) (Fig. 3D). Importantly, there was a significant reduction in AMPA sPSC frequency at 2 and 4 weeks, whereas GABA sPSC frequency was unaltered (t test; control vs bumetanide; AMPA frequency: 2 weeks, 0.8 ± 0.1 vs 0.3 ± 0.1 Hz, p = 0.0008; 4 weeks, 1.9 ± 0.3 vs 0.2 ± 0.1 Hz, p < 0.0001; GABA frequency: 2 weeks, 0.59 ± 0.11 vs 0.68 ± 0.08 Hz, p = 0.5405; 4 weeks, 2.02 ± 0.18 vs 2.01 ± 0.36 Hz, p = 0.9741) (Fig. 3E,F). Similarly, quantifying the proportion of total synaptic inputs that are excitatory or inhibitory revealed that bumetanide-treated animals exhibited a shift that tips the balance toward inhibition (Fig. 3E,F). Together, these data suggest that systemic blockade of NKCC1 with bumetanide during the perinatal period can disrupt excitatory synapse formation in the cortex, resulting in an abnormal balance between excitatory and inhibitory activity in the adult brain.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bumetanide treatment disrupts excitatory synapse formation in vivo. A, B, Voltage ramps obtained from P0 cortical neurons treated with either control saline or bumetanide under gramicidin-perforated patch-clamp conditions. EGABA reversed at more hyperpolarized (more ...)
Nkcc1 knockdown disrupts morphology of cortical neurons
To examine the effect of Nkcc1 knockdown on the morphology of newborn cortical neurons, we used DiI electrophoresis to fill GFP+ neurons to label all their main branches and visualized their dendritic arbors in merged confocal stacks. At 2 and 3 weeks postnatal, control GFP+ cells had the expected morphology of cortical pyramidal neurons with a basal axon and a thick, prominent apical dendrite (Fig. 4A). Compared with the control cells, Nkcc1-shRNA-expressing cells had a thinner apical dendrite that is effectively indistinguishable from other primary dendrites emanating from the cell body. Furthermore, Nkcc1-shRNA-expressing cells had significantly smaller cell bodies, 54 and 38% reduction from soma sizes of the respective age-matched control cells (t test; DsRed-shRNA vs Nkcc1-shRNA; 2 weeks, p < 0.0001; 3 weeks, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 4B). In addition to the smaller cell body, Nkcc1-shRNA cells also exhibited fewer primary dendrites compared with control cells. At 2 weeks, whereas control neurons had between seven and eight primary dendrites, on average, the experimental GFP+ cells had only four to five primary dendrites (t test; DsRed-shRNA vs Nkcc1-shRNA; p = 0.0012) (Fig. 4C). The reduction in primary dendrites in experimental GFP+ cells persisted at 3 weeks postnatal (t test; DsRed-shRNA vs Nkcc1-shRNA; 9.2 ± 0.4 vs 6.5 ± 0.3; p < 0.0001) (Fig. 4C).
Given the substantial changes in synaptic physiology and cell morphology of Nkcc1-knockdown neurons, we investigated whether dendritic spines of newborn pyramidal neurons are also affected. We analyzed the mean spine density on secondary apical and basal dendrites of GFP+ cells using confocal microscopy. We found that in the control neurons, average spine density increased from 0.53 to 0.62 spines/µm as the neurons matured between weeks 2 and 3. In contrast, the Nkcc1-shRNA-expressing cells showed a significant decrease in spine density compared with the controls, 0.26 and 0.40 spines/µm at 2 and 3 weeks, respectively (t test; DsRed-shRNA vs Nkcc1-shRNA; 2 weeks, p < 0.0001; 3 weeks, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 5A,B). To further characterize the dendritic spines, we measured the length of the spines, which is indicative of synapse maturity as longer, thinner spines and filopodia contain fewer AMPA receptors (Matsuzaki et al., 2001). We found that spines on control GFP+ neurons averaged 1.7 and 1.1 µm at 2 and 3 weeks, whereas those of Nkcc1-knockdown cells measured 2.2 and 1.4 µm for the respective ages (t test; DsRed-shRNA vs Nkcc1-shRNA; 2 weeks, p < 0.0001; 3 weeks, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 5A,C). The decreased spine density and increased spine length in the experimental neurons correlates with the overall decrease in AMPA sPSC frequency, demonstrating that GABA activity plays a permissive role for the synaptic organization of newborn cortical neurons.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Nkcc1-shRNA expression disrupts synaptic spines of cortical pyramidal neurons. A, Images of 2 and 3 week control or Nkcc1-shRNA-expressing cortical neurons. Cortical pyramidal are neurons filled with Dil for visualization of their dendritic spines on (more ...)
GABA depolarization activates NMDA receptors to regulate excitatory synapse formation
A long line of evidence suggests the importance of activity-dependent mechanisms in synapse formation at both the neuro-muscular junction as well as the central synapse (Scheetz et al., 1997; Wu and Cline, 1998; Tao and Poo, 2005). In the developing brain, many glutamate synapses are initially AMPA-silent but can transmit NMDA receptor-mediated signaling (LoTurco et al., 1991). When pre-synaptic activity is paired with postsynaptic depolarization, the voltage-dependent Mg2+ block of the NMDA channel is relieved and AMPA signaling becomes active (Isaac et al., 1995; Liao et al., 1995; Xiao et al., 2004). Because GABA has an excitatory effect on developing neurons, we hypothesized that GABA may provide the depolarization necessary to activate the AMPA-silent synapses via an NMDA receptor-dependent mechanism. To test this hypothesis, we attempted to rescue the developmental defect of AMPA synapse formation in Nkcc1-knockdown cells with an NMDA receptor mutant that is less sensitive to the voltage-dependent block by Mg2+ and therefore not dependent on membrane depolarization induced by GABA (Wollmuth et al., 1998a,b). Outside-out patch recordings of wild-type P0 cortical neurons in the presence of 1 mM extracellular Mg2+ and 40 µm glycine revealed the typical voltage-dependent Mg2+ block relieved by depolarization and blocked by NMDA receptor antagonist d-AP-5 (Fig. 6A). However, neurons electroporated with a previously characterized NMDA receptor mutant with an N+1S substitution at the NR2A subunit revealed channel currents that lacked voltage-dependent block at negative holding potentials as described previously by Wollmuth et al. (1998b) (Fig. 6A,B).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Rescue of Nkcc1 knockdown with a voltage-independent NMDA receptor mutant. A, Outside-out patch recordings of P0 control cortical neurons or neurons electroporated with the NR2A N + 1S NMDA receptor mutant (NR2Amut). Channels were recorded in the presence (more ...)
Interestingly, when we coelectroporated Nkcc1-shRNA with the NR2Amut channel at E15, we found that the NR2Amut channel indeed rescued the reduced AMPA sPSCs observed in Nkcc1-shRNA-expressing cells (t test; Nkcc1-shRNA vs Nkcc1+NR2Amut; 2 weeks: 0.06 ± 0.03 vs 0.62 ± 0.13 Hz, p = 0.0005; 3 weeks: 0.16 ± 0.10 vs 0.80 ± 0.16 Hz, p = 0.0030) (Fig. 6C,E). NR2Amut also rescued the decrease in GABA sPSC frequency observed in Nkcc1-knockdown neurons at 2 weeks (t test; Nkcc1-shRNA vs Nkcc1+NR2Amut; 2 weeks: 0.16 ± 0.05 vs 0.42 ± 0.07 Hz, p = 0.0001; 3 weeks: 1.55 ± 0.61 vs 1.31 ± 0.26 Hz, p = 0.6824) (Fig. 6D,F). Proportions of AMPA- and GABA-mediated sPSCs in rescue neurons resembled those of control neurons and were significantly different from those in Nkcc1-shRNA-expressing neurons both at 2 weeks (t test; Nkcc1-shRNA vs Nkcc1+NR2Amut; AMPA: 0.17 ± 0.07 vs 0.42 ± 0.07, p = 0.0247; GABA: 0.92 ± 0.13 vs 0.59 ± 0.06, p = 0.0280) and 3 weeks (t test; Nkcc1-shRNA vs Nkcc1 + NR2Amut; AMPA: 0.12 ± 0.06 vs 0.57 ± 0.06, p = 0.0001; GABA: 0.81 ± 0.05 vs 0.65 ± 0.05, p = 0.0324) (Fig. 6C–F). To confirm that the observed rescue was attributable to the voltage independence of NR2Amut, we coexpressed wild-type NR2A with Nkcc1-shRNA and analyzed the sPSCs. Interestingly, at 2 weeks, electroporation of NR2A was unable to rescue the decrease in AMPA synapse formation but was able to rescue the decrease in GABAergic sPSCs (t test; Nkcc1-shRNA vs NR2A; AMPA: 0.06 ± 0.03 vs 0.19 ± 0.07 Hz, p = 0.0714, GABA: 0.20 ± 0.04 vs 0.71 ± 0.19 Hz, p = 0.0030) (Fig. 6C,D), further suggesting that GABA and AMPA synapses develop by different mechanisms and that the development of AMPA synapses is uniquely dependent on NMDA receptor activation by GABA-mediated depolarization. To control for the effect of overexpressing NR2Amut, we electroporated NR2Amut with YFP and found that early expression of NR2Amut did not alter the frequency or proportion of AMPA and GABA sPSCs compared with control neurons at 3 weeks (t test; DsRed-shRNA vs NR2Amut:YFP; AMPA: 1.6 ± 0.4 vs 1.2 ± 0.4 Hz, p = 0.4229; GABA: 1.9 ± 0.5 vs 1.0 ± 0.2 Hz, p = 0.1000) (Fig. 6E,F). Thus, only the expression of an NMDA receptor that can be activated without membrane depolarization was able to restore the balance between excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs on the newborn neurons.
To also confirm that NMDA receptor activation during the period of GABA depolarization is critical for synapse development, we performed RNAi knockdown of NR1, the obligatory NMDA receptor subunit, to assess the effect on synaptic transmission in cortical neurons. To test the efficacy of NR1 knockdown, we recorded NMDA currents from 1-week-old cortical neurons of mice electroporated with NR1-shRNA at E15. After a 5 s focal application of NMDA (30 µm), control neurons from electroporated animals displayed large inward NMDA-mediated currents recorded from a holding potential of −70 mV and in the presence of Mg2+ -free bath solution containing TTx (0.5 µm), bicuculline (100 µm), and DNQX (20 µm) (Fig. 7A). However, NR1-shRNA-expressing neurons had drastically decreased current amplitudes in response to NMDA application compared with controls (t test; control vs NR1-shRNA; 64 ± 3 vs 8 ± 3 pA; p < 0.0001) (Fig. 7A,B). Interestingly, NR1 knockdown during the period of GABA depolarization caused a decrease in total sPSC frequency at 2 weeks but not at 3 weeks (t test; DsRed-shRNA vs NR1-shRNA; 2 weeks: 1.93 ± 0.25 vs 0.82 ± 0.18 Hz, p = 0.0017; 3 weeks: 3.62 ± 0.64 vs 3.96 ± 1.27 Hz, p = 0.8011) (Fig. 7B). Moreover, the decrease in synaptic transmission at 2 weeks was attributable to a selective failure to develop excitatory AMPA transmission, whereas GABA sPSCs were not significantly decreased (t test; DsRed-shRNA vs NR1-shRNA; AMPA: 0.86 ± 0.17 vs 0.29 ± 0.09 Hz, p = 0.0019; GABA: 0.70 ± 0.15 vs 0.44 ± 0.07 Hz, p = 0.2277) (Fig. 7C,D), similar to the effect of Nkcc1 knockdown. Together, this evidence strongly suggests a process in which GABA-induced depolarization through GABAAR activation is required to induce the expression of AMPA synapses by activating NMDA receptors, supporting a Hebbian mechanism of synapse formation via an activity-dependent detection of both excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission.
Figure 7
Figure 7
NR1 knockdown disrupts excitatory AMPA synapse formation. A, Current traces of 1 week postnatal control neurons or neurons expressing NR1-shRNA in response to 30 µm NMDA application (shown by line on top). Traces on the right represent a shorter (more ...)
A precise balance of excitatory glutamatergic and inhibitory GABAergic synaptic inputs onto mammalian cortical neurons is essential for the proper function of cortical circuits. We now provide evidence for an activity-dependent mechanism by which early depolarizing GABAergic inputs regulate the development of AMPA receptor-mediated glutamatergic synapses via an NMDA receptor-mediated process. First, using electrophysiological recordings, we show that abolishing GABA-mediated excitation in utero by RNAi knockdown and bumetanide block significantly reduces the development of AMPA receptor-mediated transmission in the first weeks after birth and persists into early adulthood. Second, we show through an array of morphological analysis that dendritic arbors as well as spine density and spine length are altered when GABA excitation is blocked. These observations provide additional evidence for a loss of glutamatergic transmission because these morphological changes most likely reflect responses of neurons to decreased AMPA transmission (Wu and Cline, 1998; Cline, 2001; Cohen-Cory, 2002; Zhou et al., 2004; Haas et al., 2006). Third, we show that the Nkcc-RNAi phenotype is rescued by a mutant voltage-independent NMDA receptor and replicated by NR1 knockdown, indicating that the role of GABA in glutamatergic synaptic development is dependent on its ability to depolarize and activate voltage-dependent NMDA receptors.
The high intracellular chloride gradient in immature neurons has been observed in all species studied and thus is highly evolutionarily conserved (Owens et al., 1996; Khazipov et al., 2001; Akerman and Cline, 2006). Because GABA-mediated spontaneous synaptic activity develops before glutamatergic synaptic activity in the perinatal neocortex, these large and slow depolarizations may provide the first excitatory drive necessary for activity-dependent synapse formation (Ben-Ari, 2006). By altering the chloride gradient of newborn cortical neurons in vivo, we demonstrate here that GABA-induced excitation via GABAAR activation plays a permissive role in the formation of synaptic inputs on newborn cortical neurons. Our findings complement a recent study of newly generated granule neurons in the adult dentate gyrus, providing evidence that GABA-mediated excitation drives synaptic integration of newborn neurons in both embryos and adults (Ge et al., 2006). The depolarizing effects of GABA provide a rational solution to the problem of equilibrating excitation and inhibition during brain maturation. Because EGABA is closer to the resting membrane potential than Eglutamate, GABAAR activation can drive action potentials and calcium influx without the toxic effects associated with glutamate overexcitation, thus modulating developmental processes without risking cell injury (Ben-Ari, 2006).
The long-lasting effects (up to 4 weeks after birth) of disruptions in early GABA signaling seen here suggest that there may be a critical period for cortical synaptogenesis similar to the critical period for visual cortex plasticity (Hensch, 2005). Our findings seemingly contradict a previous study in which visual deprivation during a sensitive period in rat resulted in a net increase in excitatory and decrease in inhibitory synaptic drive in layer 4 neurons of the primary visual cortex (Maffei et al., 2004). However, the homeostatic responses seen by Maffei et al. (2004) occurred at a later stage (P15–P17) than our manipulations (E15–P7). We propose that because GABA-mediated spontaneous synaptic activity develops before glutamatergic synaptic activity in the perinatal neocortex, GABA depolarization may provide the first excitatory drive necessary for synapse formation. This has important implications for using the NKCC1 blocker bumetanide to treat neonatal seizures. A study by Dzhala et al. (2005) showed a clear therapeutic effect of bumetanide in treating neonatal seizures in rats by decreasing the excitatory effects of GABA, an observation that supports the use of bumetanide, an FDA-approved diuretic, for the treatment of neonatal seizures in humans. However, our data indicate that early bumetanide exposure during the period of GABA depolarization (E15–P7 in mice) produces a persistent clear disturbance in the formation of excitatory synapses in cortical neurons. Although neonatal seizures in humans typically abate after 3–4 d, prolonged inhibition of NKCC1 during the period of GABA depolarization (~35–45 weeks after conception) might cause lasting changes in synapse formation, warranting future studies to investigate the possible adverse effects of bumetanide in treating neonatal seizures.
In addition to the physiological evidence for defective synaptic integration, changing early GABA-induced excitation to inhibition anatomically alters circuitry development. In a recent study, Cancedda et al. (2007) showed that reversing the excitatory effect of GABA in cortical neurons by premature expression of KCC2 results in fewer and shorter dendrites (Cancedda et al., 2007). Here, we confirm these findings by knocking down NKCC1 function and also demonstrate through electrophysiological recordings and analysis of spine morphology that glutamatergic synapse development is perturbed. Furthermore, we also provide a mechanism by which GABA exerts its role by activating NMDA receptors, confirming a previous study in which NR1 knockdown led to an increase in spine motility and eventual destabilization in spine structure and loss of excitatory synapses (Alvarez et al., 2007). Glutamatergic activity has been known to activate various downstream pathways involving factors such as Ras, Rho-GTPases, and CaMKII (calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II) to regulate dendritic arborization and synapse formation (Rajan and Cline, 1998; Li et al., 2000; Sin et al., 2002; Zhou et al., 2004). Furthermore, AMPA receptor-mediated transmission promotes dendritic arbor growth by mobilizing intracellular signaling cascades that stabilize and maintain branch formation (Wu et al., 1996; Rajan and Cline, 1998; Shi et al., 1999; Haas et al., 2006). Blocking glutamatergic synapse development has been shown to impair the growth of dendritic arbors by reducing branch stabilization (Haas et al., 2006). This suggests that the dendritic arbor defect observed in the present study as well as by Cancedda et al. (2007) is likely a result of perturbed AMPA receptor-mediated synapse development. Future studies using time-lapse imaging to address the dynamics of the dendritic branches would shed more light on this process.
Perhaps most interestingly, we provide in vivo evidence that a neurotransmitter can regulate the balance between excitation and inhibition in a developing circuit. The balanced development of excitatory and inhibitory inputs has been identified as an activity-dependent process (Liu et al., 2004; Tao and Poo, 2005). A premature hyperpolarizing shift in the Cl reversal potential has been shown to increase the ratio of inhibitory to excitatory inputs in Xenopus tectal neurons and rat cortical neurons in culture (Chudotvorova et al., 2005; Akerman and Cline, 2006). However, two questions had remained elusive: whether GABA regulates this balance in the developing mammalian cortex and what the mechanisms are that control this process. We now show that GABA regulates the formation of excitatory synapses in the mammalian cortex. In addition, our finding that depolarizing GABAergic transmission is required for the formation of glutamatergic synapses via GABAARs and NMDA receptor activation provides a mechanism for this process. Cortical neurons begin to express functional NMDA receptors when they migrate to the cortical plate, but these initial glutamatergic synapses are “silent” because of the Mg2+ block of NMDA receptors at the resting membrane potential (LoTurco et al., 1991; Akerman and Cline, 2006). GABAergic depolarization can facilitate relief of this voltage-dependent Mg2+ block and allow Ca2+ entry to initiate intracellular signaling cascades (Leinekugel et al., 1997). Our NR1 knockdown data confirm previous findings in which RNAi knockdown of NR1 in cultured hippocampal neurons led to an increase in synaptic spine motility, a decrease in spine stabilization, and an eventual loss of excitatory synapses (Alvarez et al., 2007). Whereas Alvarez et al. (2007) suggest that the physical interaction of the NR1 C-terminal tail is responsible for the long-term stabilization of synapse and spines, our data suggest that the ionotropic property of NMDA receptors is critical for excitatory synapse formation. The differences seen here may be attributable to experimental manipulations and timing of knockdown (in utero delivery of RNAi in vivo at E15 vs transfection of organotypic slice cultures of P7 rat hippocampus).
Cooperation with NMDA receptor activation represents an early form of coincidence detection between GABAergic and glutamatergic inputs. We propose a model in which GABA activation, reflecting the quantity of GABAergic (and eventually inhibitory) inputs onto the newborn neuron, permits the development of glutamatergic synapses (Fig. 8). Thus, the balance between excitation and inhibition is ensured from the beginning of synaptogenesis.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Proposed model for excitatory and inhibitory synapse matching. A, An immature pyramidal cell (blue) expresses NKCC1 to generate a high intracellular chloride concentration. A GABAergic interneuron (red) releases GABA and depolarizes the pyramidal cell (more ...)
Supplementary Material
Fig.1A-C_2A-B
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (A.R.K.), the Medical Scientist Training Program (D.D.W.), and the American Epilepsy Society (D.D.W.). We thank members of the Kriegstein laboratory for discussion and manuscript editing, H. Song for providing Nkcc1 cDNA and shRNA constructs, L. Wollmuth for providing NMDA receptor NR2A and NR2A mutant constructs, E. Hueske for providing NMDA NR1 shRNA constructs, and W. Walantus and J. Agudelo for technical support.
  • Akerman CJ, Cline HT. Depolarizing GABAergic conductances regulate the balance of excitation to inhibition in the developing retinotectal circuit in vivo. J Neurosci. 2006;26:5117–5130. [PubMed]
  • Alvarez VA, Ridenour DA, Sabatini BL. Distinct structural and ionotropic roles of NMDA receptors in controlling spine and synapse stability. J Neurosci. 2007;27:7365–7376. [PubMed]
  • Barbin G, Pollard H, Gaiarsa JL, Ben-Ari Y. Involvement of GABAA receptors in the outgrowth of cultured hippocampal neurons. Neurosci Lett. 1993;152:150–154. [PubMed]
  • Ben-Ari Y. Basic developmental rules and their implications for epilepsy in the immature brain. Epileptic Disord. 2006;8:91–102. [PubMed]
  • Cancedda L, Fiumelli H, Chen K, Poo MM. Excitatory GABA action is essential for morphological maturation of cortical neurons in vivo. J Neurosci. 2007;27:5224–5235. [PubMed]
  • Chen G, Trombley PQ, van den Pol AN. GABA receptors precede glutamate receptors in hypothalamic development; differential regulation by astrocytes. J Neurophysiol. 1995;74:1473–1484. [PubMed]
  • Chudotvorova I, Ivanov A, Rama S, Hubner CA, Pellegrino C, Ben-Ari Y, Medina I. Early expression of KCC2 in rat hippocampal cultures augments expression of functional GABA synapses. J Physiol (Lond) 2005;566:671–679. [PubMed]
  • Cline HT. Dendritic arbor development and synaptogenesis. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001;11:118–126. [PubMed]
  • Cohen-Cory S. The developing synapse: construction and modulation of synaptic structures and circuits. Science. 2002;298:770–776. [PubMed]
  • Delpire E. Cation-chloride cotransporters in neuronal communication. News Physiol Sci. 2000;15:309–312. [PubMed]
  • Dzhala VI, Talos DM, Sdrulla DA, Brumback AC, Mathews GC, Benke TA, Delpire E, Jensen FE, Staley KJ. NKCC1 transporter facilitates seizures in the developing brain. Nat Med. 2005;11:1205–1213. [PubMed]
  • Ge S, Goh EL, Sailor KA, Kitabatake Y, Ming GL, Song H. GABA regulates synaptic integration of newly generated neurons in the adult brain. Nature. 2006;439:589–593. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Haas K, Li J, Cline HT. AMPA receptors regulate experience-dependent dendritic arbor growth in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:12127–12131. [PubMed]
  • Heck N, Kilb W, Reiprich P, Kubota H, Furukawa T, Fukuda A, Luhmann HJ. GABA-A receptors regulate neocortical neuronal migration in vitro and in vivo. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17:138–148. [PubMed]
  • Hennou S, Khalilov I, Diabira D, Ben-Ari Y, Gozlan H. Early sequential formation of functional GABA(A) and glutamatergic synapses on CA1 interneurons of the rat foetal hippocampus. Eur J Neurosc. 2002;16:197–208. [PubMed]
  • Hensch TK. Critical period plasticity in local cortical circuits. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:877–888. [PubMed]
  • Isaac JT, Nicoll RA, Malenka RC. Evidence for silent synapses: implications for the expression of LTP. Neuron. 1995;15:427–434. [PubMed]
  • Khazipov R, Esclapez M, Caillard O, Bernard C, Khalilov I, Tyzio R, Hirsch J, Dzhala V, Berger B, Ben-Ari Y. Early development of neuronal activity in the primate hippocampus in utero. J Neurosci. 2001;21:9770–9781. [PubMed]
  • Kilb W, Sinning A, Luhmann HJ. Model-specific effects of bumetanide on epileptiform activity in the in-vitro intact hippocampus of the newborn mouse. Neuropharmacology. 2007;53:524–533. [PubMed]
  • Leinekugel X, Medina I, Khalilov I, Ben-Ari Y, Khazipov R. Ca2+ oscillations mediated by the synergistic excitatory actions of GABA(A) and NMDA receptors in the neonatal hippocampus. Neuron. 1997;18:243–255. [PubMed]
  • Li H, Tornberg J, Kaila K, Airaksinen MS, Rivera C. Patterns of cation-chloride cotransporter expression during embryonic rodent CNS development. Eur J Neurosci. 2002;16:2358–2370. [PubMed]
  • Li Z, Van Aelst L, Cline HT. Rho GTPases regulate distinct aspects of dendritic arbor growth in Xenopus central neurons in vivo. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:217–225. [PubMed]
  • Liao D, Hessler NA, Malinow R. Activation of postsynaptically silent synapses during pairing-induced LTP in CA1 region of hippocampal slice. Nature. 1995;375:400–404. [PubMed]
  • Liu L, Wong TP, Pozza MF, Lingenhoehl K, Wang Y, Sheng M, Auberson YP, Wang YT. Role of NMDA receptor subtypes in governing the direction of hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Science. 2004;304:1021–1024. [PubMed]
  • Lois C, Hong EJ, Pease S, Brown EJ, Baltimore D. Germline transmission and tissue-specific expression of transgenes delivered by lentiviral vectors. Science. 2002;295:868–872. [PubMed]
  • LoTurco JJ, Blanton MG, Kriegstein AR. Initial expression and endogenous activation of NMDA channels in early neocortical development. J Neurosci. 1991;11:792–799. [PubMed]
  • LoTurco JJ, Owens DF, Heath MJ, Davis MB, Kriegstein AR. GABA and glutamate depolarize cortical progenitor cells and inhibit DNA synthesis. Neuron. 1995;15:1287–1298. [PubMed]
  • Maffei A, Nelson SB, Turrigiano GG. Selective reconfiguration of layer 4 visual cortical circuitry by visual deprivation. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:1353–1359. [PubMed]
  • Matsuzaki M, Ellis-Davies GC, Nemoto T, Miyashita Y, Iino M, Kasai H. Dendritic spine geometry is critical for AMPA receptor expression in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:1086–1092. [PubMed]
  • Noctor SC, Flint AC, Weissman TA, Dammerman RS, Kriegstein AR. Neurons derived from radial glial cells establish radial units in neocortex. Nature. 2001;409:714–720. [PubMed]
  • Owens DF, Kriegstein AR. Is there more to GABA than synaptic inhibition? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:715–727. [PubMed]
  • Owens DF, Boyce LH, Davis MB, Kriegstein AR. Excitatory GABA responses in embryonic and neonatal cortical slices demonstrated by gramicidin perforated-patch recordings and calcium imaging. J Neurosci. 1996;16:6414–6423. [PubMed]
  • Owens DF, Liu X, Kriegstein AR. Changing properties of GABA(A) receptor-mediated signaling during early neocortical development. J Neurophysiol. 1999;82:570–583. [PubMed]
  • Plotkin MD, Snyder EY, Hebert SC, Delpire E. Expression of the Na-K-2Cl cotransporter is developmentally regulated in postnatal rat brains: a possible mechanism underlying GABA’s excitatory role in immature brain. J Neurobiol. 1997;33:781–795. [PubMed]
  • Rajan I, Cline HT. Glutamate receptor activity is required for normal development of tectal cell dendrites in vivo. J Neurosci. 1998;18:7836–7846. [PubMed]
  • Rivera C, Voipio J, Payne JA, Ruusuvuori E, Lahtinen H, Lamsa K, Pirvola U, Saarma M, Kaila K. The K+/Cl− co-transporter KCC2 renders GABA hyperpolarizing during neuronal maturation. Nature. 1999;397:251–255. [PubMed]
  • Saito T, Nakatsuji N. Efficient gene transfer into the embryonic mouse brain using in vivo electroporation. Dev Biol. 2001;240:237–246. [PubMed]
  • Scheetz AJ, Nairn AC, Constantine-Paton M. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activation and visual activity induce elongation factor-2 phosphorylation in amphibian tecta: a role for N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in controlling protein synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:14770–14775. [PubMed]
  • Shi SH, Hayashi Y, Petralia RS, Zaman SH, Wenthold RJ, Svoboda K, Malinow R. Rapid spine delivery and redistribution of AMPA receptors after synaptic NMDA receptor activation. Science. 1999;284:1811–1816. [PubMed]
  • Sin WC, Haas K, Ruthazer ES, Cline HT. Dendrite growth increased by visual activity requires NMDA receptor and Rho GTPases. Nature. 2002;419:475–480. [PubMed]
  • Tao HW, Poo MM. Activity-dependent matching of excitatory and inhibitory inputs during refinement of visual receptive fields. Neuron. 2005;45:829–836. [PubMed]
  • Tyzio R, Represa A, Jorquera I, Ben-Ari Y, Gozlan H, Aniksztejn L. The establishment of GABAergic and glutamatergic synapses on CA1 pyramidal neurons is sequential and correlates with the development of the apical dendrite. J Neurosci. 1999;19:10372–10382. [PubMed]
  • Wollmuth LP, Kuner T, Sakmann B. Adjacent asparagines in the NR2-subunit of the NMDA receptor channel control the voltage-dependent block by extracellular Mg2+ J Physiol (Lond) 1998a;506:13–32. [PubMed]
  • Wollmuth LP, Kuner T, Sakmann B. Intracellular Mg2+ interacts with structural determinants of the narrow constriction contributed by the NR1-subunit in the NMDA receptor channel. J Physiol (Lond) 1998b;506:33–52. [PubMed]
  • Wu G, Malinow R, Cline HT. Maturation of a central glutamatergic synapse. Science. 1996;274:972–976. [PubMed]
  • Wu GY, Cline HT. Stabilization of dendritic arbor structure in vivo by CaMKII. Science. 1998;279:222–226. [PubMed]
  • Xiao MY, Wasling P, Hanse E, Gustafsson B. Creation of AMPA-silent synapses in the neonatal hippocampus. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:236–243. [PubMed]
  • Zhou Q, Homma KJ, Poo MM. Shrinkage of dendritic spines associated with long-term depression of hippocampal synapses. Neuron. 2004;44:749–757. [PubMed]