Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jcmPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalJCM ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
J Clin Microbiol. 1990 November; 28(11): 2520–2525.
PMCID: PMC268218

Prospective multicenter study of vascular-catheter-related complications and risk factors for positive central-catheter cultures in intensive care unit patients.


To determine the incidence rate of complications associated with vascular catheters in intensive care unit patients and to analyze risk factors for a positive vascular culture, we performed a multicenter study of intensive care unit patients at eight French hospitals. During the study period, 865 intravenous catheters were inserted in 566 patients; 362 (41.8%) were peripheral catheters, and 503 (58.2%) were central catheters. Local complications (i.e., infiltration) occurred significantly more often with peripheral than with central catheters (P less than 0.001); in contrast, fever and bacteremia were significantly more often associated with central than with peripheral catheters (P less than 0.01 and P less than 0.05, respectively). The culture of the vascular-catheter tip was positive for 24% of central catheters (32 of 1,000 catheters days) and for 9% of peripheral catheters (21 of 1,000 catheters days). Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common microorganism isolated from both peripheral and central catheters, followed by Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. No significant risk factor associated with positive cultures for peripheral catheters was found by univariate analysis. In contrast, the purpose of the cannula (nutrition and monitoring of central venous pressure), the insertion site (jugular), the dressing type (semipermeable transparent dressing), the antiseptic used to prepare the insertion site (povidone iodine), and routine changing of the intravenous administration set were significantly associated with positive cultures of central catheters. Three factors, duration of catheterization, use of a semipermeable transparent dressing, and the jugular insertion site, were found to be independently associated with positive cultures of central catheters by multivariate analysis.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (941K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Bozzetti F, Terno G, Camerini E, Baticci F, Scarpa D, Pupa A. Pathogenesis and predictability of central venous catheter sepsis. Surgery. 1982 Apr;91(4):383–389. [PubMed]
  • Conly JM, Grieves K, Peters B. A prospective, randomized study comparing transparent and dry gauze dressings for central venous catheters. J Infect Dis. 1989 Feb;159(2):310–319. [PubMed]
  • Eisenhauer ED, Derveloy RJ, Hastings PR. Prospective evaluation of central venous pressure (CVP) catheters in a large city-county hospital. Ann Surg. 1982 Nov;196(5):560–564. [PubMed]
  • Giuffrida DJ, Bryan-Brown CW, Lumb PD, Kwun KB, Rhoades HM. Central vs peripheral venous catheters in critically ill patients. Chest. 1986 Dec;90(6):806–809. [PubMed]
  • Lindblad B, Wolff T. Infectious complications of percutaneously inserted central venous catheters. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1985 Aug;29(6):587–589. [PubMed]
  • Maki DG, Band JD. A comparative study of polyantibiotic and iodophor ointments in prevention of vascular catheter-related infection. Am J Med. 1981 Mar;70(3):739–744. [PubMed]
  • Maki DG, Ringer M. Evaluation of dressing regimens for prevention of infection with peripheral intravenous catheters. Gauze, a transparent polyurethane dressing, and an iodophor-transparent dressing. JAMA. 1987 Nov 6;258(17):2396–2403. [PubMed]
  • Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med. 1977 Jun 9;296(23):1305–1309. [PubMed]
  • Michel L, McMichan JC, Bachy JL. Microbial colonization of indwelling central venous catheters: statistical evaluation of potential contaminating factors. Am J Surg. 1979 Jun;137(6):745–748. [PubMed]
  • Prager RL, Silva J., Jr Colonization of central venous catheters. South Med J. 1984 Apr;77(4):458–461. [PubMed]
  • Ricard P, Martin R, Marcoux JA. Protection of indwelling vascular catheters: incidence of bacterial contamination and catheter-related sepsis. Crit Care Med. 1985 Jul;13(7):541–543. [PubMed]
  • Righter J, Bishop LA, Hill B. Infection and peripheral venous catheterization. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Jun;1(2):89–93. [PubMed]
  • Sketch MH, Cale M, Mohiuddin SM, Booth RW. Use of percutaneously inserted venous catheters in coronary care units. Chest. 1972 Dec;62(6):684–689. [PubMed]
  • Tager IB, Ginsberg MB, Ellis SE, Walsh NE, Dupont I, Simchen E, Faich GA. An epidemiologic study of the risks associated with peripheral intravenous catheters. Am J Epidemiol. 1983 Dec;118(6):839–851. [PubMed]
  • Tomford JW, Hershey CO, McLaren CE, Porter DK, Cohen DI. Intravenous therapy team and peripheral venous catheter-associated complications. A prospective controlled study. Arch Intern Med. 1984 Jun;144(6):1191–1194. [PubMed]
  • Tully JL, Friedland GH, Baldini LM, Goldmann DA. Complications of intravenous therapy with steel needles and Teflon catheters. A comparative study. Am J Med. 1981 Mar;70(3):702–706. [PubMed]
  • Wilkins EG, Manning D, Roberts C, Davidson DC. Quantitative bacteriology of peripheral venous cannulae in neonates. J Hosp Infect. 1985 Jun;6(2):209–217. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)