The concentration of oxygen present within the microenvironment dramatically affects the reactivity of NO by influencing its stability and the range of additional RNS generated. NO is oxidized to nitrite more rapidly as oxygen levels increase, and therefore, oxygen is considered to be one significant factor in limiting the half-life of NO in biological systems (
12,
87). Bacteria growing in high- versus low-oxygen conditions exhibit different expression profiles of RNS-detoxifying enzymes, likely as an adaptation to coordinate the production of appropriate RNS detoxification mechanisms with other metabolic pathways active under these environmental conditions (
14,
67,
68). Furthermore, inappropriate expression of enzymes involved in RNS defense can be detrimental to bacterial survival. For example, under aerobic conditions,
E. coli and
S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (
56,
79) detoxify RNS via
hmp, which catalyzes oxygen-dependent conversion of NO to nitrate and is repressed by FNR under low-oxygen conditions (
17,
28,
56,
57,
79,
94). Deletion of
hmp reduces the virulence of
S. enterica serovar Typhimurium in mice; however, constitutive expression of
hmp can lead to microbial-derived oxidative stress (
6), implying that tight regulation of genes involved in nitrosative stress defense is essential for bacteria to withstand challenge from host immunity. Therefore, bacteria must tailor their defense strategies against these reactive species according to the conditions in which they are encountered.
In this study, we investigated the role of
H. influenzae FNR in the regulation of resistance to RNS. FNR in other bacterial species plays complex roles in RNS defense. In addition to its well-characterized function in oxygen sensing, FNR of
E. coli was also shown to respond directly to NO (
68). In
Neisseria meningitidis, the FNR response to NO mediates part of a homeostatic regulatory circuit by decreasing the expression of the FNR-activated nitrite reductase AniA (
36), which is capable of generating a high level of endogenous NO (
71). A denitrification pathway resembling that of
N. meningitidis is not present in
H. influenzae; however, the
nrfA gene in
H. influenzae is similar at the predicted amino acid level to the cytochrome
c nitrite reductase
nrfA of
E. coli. Unlike AniA,
nrfA has been implicated in NO detoxification (
66,
85). We found that the
H. influenzae fnr gene is required for appreciable levels of nitrite reductase activity (Fig. ), suggesting positive control by FNR of the
nrfABCD operon, predicted to encode the sole nitrite reductase in this species. A nonpolar in-frame deletion of the
nrfA gene abrogated the FNR-dependent dissimilatory nitrite reduction by
H. influenzae, and complementation restored activity (Fig. ). Studies with a reporter fused to the
nrfA gene confirmed FNR-dependent activation of
nrfA expression and demonstrated
nrfA expression under a range of low-oxygen conditions, consistent with the predicted role of FNR in anaerobic transcriptional regulation (Fig. ). Under low-oxygen conditions that promote
fnr activity, as inferred by its ability to positively control
nrfA expression, the
fnr mutant was hypersusceptible to NO donors GSNO and ASN, implicating genes of the FNR regulon in RNS defense (Fig. ). Consistent with this hypothesis,
nrfA was also required for resistance to NO donors (Fig. ). The sensitivity of the
nrfA mutant was not as pronounced as that of the
fnr mutant, suggesting that additional
fnr-regulated genes play a role in RNS defense.
A previous study using a bioinformatic approach to identify potential FNR-regulated genes in
H. influenzae identified potential FNR binding sites in the promoter for
ytfE (
83). YtfE is a member of a broadly conserved family of di-iron proteins that participate in the biogenesis and repair of iron-sulfur centers (
41,
42,
63). Our transcriptional analysis revealed FNR-dependent positive control over transcript levels of
ytfE in
H. influenzae (Fig. ). Because
ytfE participates in RNS resistance mechanisms in other bacteria, we examined its role in the resistance of
H. influenzae to chemical NO donors GSNO and ASN. Deletion of
ytfE led to marked attenuation for survival after exposure to these NO donors, and complementation with
ytfE, provided in single copy at an ectopic chromosomal site, restored resistance (Fig. ). Therefore,
ytfE of
H. influenzae is positively controlled by FNR and mediates resistance to donors of RNS, implicating the activation of
ytfE expression as a primary mechanism of the observed
fnr-dependent RNS resistance in
H. influenzae.
These results indicate a different mode of control in
H. influenzae than in a diverse set of pathogenic bacteria in which
ytfE regulation has been examined. In
E. coli,
ytfE is negatively controlled by FNR and by an additional NO-sensitive DNA binding protein, NsrR, which is absent in
H. influenzae, based on genome sequence analysis (
9,
27,
41). The NsrR protein of
E. coli has been implicated as a direct repressor (
9,
22), whereas the absence of a recognizable FNR binding site in the
E. coli ytfE promoter has suggested that the effect of FNR may be indirect (
41). In the presence of NO, both negative regulators become inactive, leading to
ytfE expression. Much of this regulatory circuitry and expression pattern appears to be conserved in bacterial species as diverse as
Staphylococcus aureus,
S. enterica serovar Typhimurium, and
N. gonorrhoeae, each of which contains genes with functional and sequence similarity to
nsrR,
fnr, and
ytfE (
63). Moreover, the
N. gonorrhoeae NsrR has been demonstrated to directly repress target promoters in a NO-sensitive manner (
38). In contrast,
H. influenzae lacks a gene with any significant similarity to
nsrR, and FNR positively controls
ytfE, potentially via interaction with the possible FNR binding site located in its promoter. The apparent conservation of the regulatory pathway controlling
ytfE in phylogenetically diverse bacteria but not in
H. influenzae may reflect unique aspects of the regulation of RNS defense pathways in
H. influenzae pathogenesis. One possibility is that
H. influenzae primarily encounters RNS in a relatively low-oxygen environment that it likely experiences during invasion of the epithelium or in biofilms that appear to form at the mucosal surface during infection (
23). Entry into such stages of colonization could signal the requirement for induction of preemptive defenses against RNS generated when host cells respond to increased concentrations of bacterial products. In this model, an
nsrR-mediated response to NO would not be required. Alternatively, the configuration of multiple systems to metabolize toxic reactive oxygen species and RNS in different bacteria may constrain the allowable expression patterns for certain enzymes, as exemplified by the toxic effect of ectopic expression of
hmp in
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (
6).
H. influenzae lacks many enzymes of RNS defense that are present in other bacteria and, therefore, may not require the same degree of complex control to prevent such aberrant interactions.
Control of
H. influenzae by phagocytic cells has been shown to be critical during early phases of infection and during adaptive immunity (
4,
61,
82,
84,
88). To investigate the potential role of
fnr regulation in defense against host cells capable of RNS generation during the immune response, we evaluated the ability of
H. influenzae to resist the antibacterial effects of BMM with or without prior stimulation with IFN-γ or LPS, which trigger iNOS production (
49). The
fnr mutant was attenuated for survival in the presence of activated macrophages (Fig. ). Resistance also required
ytfE, both in the laboratory strain Rd and in a clinical NTHi background. Complementation of the
ytfE mutants or inhibition of macrophages with L-NAME restored the mutants to wild-type survival levels (Fig. and ). It has been shown that NO can inhibit the growth of
E. coli under fully anaerobic conditions by damaging the iron-sulfur centers of branched-chain amino acid synthesis enzymes (
70). Such bacteriostatic effects could contribute to the decreased net survival of
H. influenzae mutants that we observed in our assays. Nevertheless, it appears likely that RNS also kills
H. influenzae under the conditions we used. Experiments measuring sensitivity to ASN during a short time course of exposure revealed a decrease in CFU (Fig. ), whereas control cultures of
H. influenzae did not multiply in the same acidified medium in the absence of nitrite during this period, indicating that ASN exerted a bactericidal effect. In either case, a destructive effect of RNS on iron-sulfur centers in
H. influenzae would be consistent with the role in RNS resistance that we have detected with mutants deficient in
ytfE, whose product is a protein involved in repairing iron-sulfur centers. Therefore, the data indicate that FNR and the
ytfE gene are probably required to resist inhibitory or antimicrobial effects of RNS produced by the immune response during infection.
The role of RNS resistance in
H. influenzae pathogenesis is at the early stages of investigation. Because NO-producing cells, including macrophages and epithelial cells, are abundant in the human nasopharynx and high levels of NO are present in this primary site of asymptomatic colonization (
50), it is likely that resistance to RNS is an important adaptation for this organism.
Neisseria meningitidis, another nasopharyngeal colonizer, has been shown to require RNS defenses for viability during coincubation of bacteria with nasopharyngeal explants (
78), implicating defense against RNS as an important factor in colonization of human respiratory mucosa. Disease states also expose
H. influenzae to RNS derived from phagocytes and other cell types. Macrophages are abundant in the lung, and bacterial infection, implicated in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, is associated with elevated numbers of neutrophils (
74). Otitis media pathology involves an influx of polymorphonuclear leukocytes during acute infection and elevated numbers of macrophages during chronic disease (
93), and human middle ear effusions contain NO metabolites, including nitrate and nitrite (
40). Therefore, it will be informative to exploit knowledge of RNS resistance pathways in
H. influenzae with models such as mucosal tissue explant systems, infections of mice deficient in RNS production, or otitis media models of middle ear infection. Our investigation of FNR-mediated environmental control of defense against RNS and phagocytic killing of
H. influenzae suggests that this regulation is likely required for the survival of
H. influenzae in an in vivo environment in which oxygen levels are low, conditions that may occur when bacterial density increases on mucosal surfaces or during invasion into submucosal sites. Identifying the specific stages of colonization or disease that involve these pathways will be important for understanding how this pathogen evades host immunity.