Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Diabet Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 February 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2679689

Serologic Evidence of Infections and Type 2 Diabetes: The MultiEthnic Study of Atherosclerosis



Prospective studies have identified chronic inflammation as a risk factor for type 2 diabetes. However, it is not known whether infection by specific pathogens or having a greater “pathogen burden” is associated with diabetes. The aim of this study was to examine the cross-sectional relation of seropositivity to five pathogens (C. pneumoniae, cytomegalovirus, H. pylori, hepatitis A virus, herpes simplex virus) and prevalent diabetes.


Baseline data from a random sample of MultiEthnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) participants (n=1,000; age: 45-84) were used. Diabetes was defined by ADA 2003 criteria, and “pathogen burden” by the number of pathogens (0–5) for which an individual was seropositive. Logistic regression was used to test differences in diabetes prevalence by seropositivity. Linear regression was used to explore associations between pathogen seropositivity and the inflammation markers CRP, IL-6, and fibrinogen.


Diabetes prevalence was 12.7%, while seropositivity for C. pnuemoniae was 76%, cytomegalovirus 77%, H. pylori 45%, hepatitis A 58%, and herpes simplex virus 85%. 72% were seropositive for ≥3 pathogens. In crude analyses, the prevalence of diabetes was higher among those with a pathogen burden ≥3, and with seropositivity to cytomegalovirus, H. pylori, hepatitis A, and herpes simplex virus. After adjustment for demographic covariates (particularly race) all associations became nonsignificant. Pathogen seropositivity was also not related to inflammation marker levels.


Following demographic adjustments, no associations were observed between infection by several pathogens and diabetes status, suggesting no etiologic role for them in the occurrence of diabetes.

Keywords: diabetes, infection, pathogen, seropositivity


Prospective studies have demonstrated a positive association between incident type 2 diabetes and markers of systemic, low-grade inflammation, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and fibrinogen [1-9]. In most instances, these associations have not been explained by adjustment for established diabetes risk factors. As a potential mechanism, it has been suggested that systemic inflammation may interfere with insulin action by suppressing insulin signal transduction [10]. Specifically, there is some evidence that tumor necrosis factor-α suppresses expression of insulin receptors, and that IL-6 inhibits insulin signal transduction in hepatocytes.

Despite the accumulating evidence that chronic inflammation is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes, knowledge is limited regarding whether infection by specific pathogens contributes to the subsequent occurrence of type 2 diabetes. In the present study we hypothesized that diabetes prevalence would be higher among those with seropositivity to individual pathogens, and those with evidence of a greater “pathogen burden.”


Baseline data from MESA (2000-2002) were used in this cross-sectional analysis [11]. Briefly, 6,814 men and women between the ages of 45 and 84, all of whom were free of clinical CVD, were recruited in 6 U.S. communities. Race/ethnicity was self-reported as Hispanic, African-American, white, or Chinese. Local institutional review committees approved the MESA protocol, and all subjects gave informed consent.

Serum glucose was measured (following ≥8 hour fast) at a central lab by rate reflectance spectrophotometry using thin film adaptation of the glucose oxidase method on the Vitros analyzer (Johnson & Johnson Clinical Diagnostics, Inc., Rochester, NY 14650). The laboratory coefficient of variation (CV) was 1.1%. Prevalent diabetes was defined by fasting glucose values ≥126 mg/dL or use of glucose-lowering medications. Serum insulin was measured by the Linco Human Insulin Specific RIA Kit (Linco Research, Inc., St. Charles, MO 63304).

Immunoglobin G (IgG) antibodies to C. pneumoniae were measured in the entire cohort at baseline, while IgG antibodies to cytomegalovirus, H. pylori, hepatitis A virus, and herpes simplex virus (type 1 and type 2) were assessed in a random sample of 1,000 participants. Serum IgG antibodies to C. pneumoniae were measured with a microimmunofluorescent antibody assay (Focus Technologies, Cypress, CA), while antibodies to cytomegalovirus, H. pylori, and herpes simplex virus were measured with indirect enzyme immunoassays (CMV IgG Test Kit, H. pylori IgG Test Kit, HSV 1 & 2 Test Kit; Diamedix Corporation; Miami, Florida), and to hepatitis A virus with the IM®x HAVAB qualitative microparticle enzyme immunoassay (Abbott Laboratories; Abbott Park, IL). Standard cut-points were utilized to define seropositivity: fluorescence of ≥1 for C. pneumoniae, concentration ≥10 EU/mL for cytomegalovirus, index value ≥1.10 for H. pylori, concentration ≥20 EU/mL for herpes simplex virus, and as compared to a calibrator for hepatitis A. All IgG antibody assay CVs were less than 8%. A “pathogen burden” score was computed by summing the number of pathogens for which an individual was seropositive (range 0 – 5).

Sex, age, race/ethnicity, education and smoking status were self-reported. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight over height squared (kg)/(m2). Leisure physical activity (MET-min/wk) was computed via responses to a questionnaire. CRP and fibrinogen were measured using the BNII nephelometer (N High Sensitivity CRP, N Antiserum to Human Fibrinogen; Dade Behring Inc., Deerfield, IL), while IL-6 was measured by ultra-sensitive ELISA (Quantikine HS Human IL-6 Immunoassay; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).

Statistical Analysis

Race/ethnicity-stratified means and frequencies of unadjusted dependent variables, primary independent variables, and covariates were calculated. Prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using relative risk regression (binomial regression with a log link) to assess the relationship between diabetes and pathogen seropositivity. Linear regression was used to estimate, by seropositivity status, relative differences in inflammation marker levels, and in glucose and insulin concentrations among non-diabetic participants. Demographic-adjusted models controlled for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, and site, while models adjusting for traditional diabetes risk factors additionally controlled for smoking status, BMI, and leisure physical activity. Analyses were performed with SAS (version 9.1; Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.).


The prevalence of diabetes was 12.7%, while the prevalence of seropositivity for C. pnuemoniae was 75.5%, cytomegalovirus 76.7%, H. pylori 45.4%, hepatitis A 57.5%, and herpes simplex virus 84.9%. 72.5% were seropositive for ≥3 pathogens. Racial/ethnic differences were present in demographic and lifestyle factors, the prevalence of pathogen seropositivity, inflammation marker levels, and the prevalence of diabetes (Online Supplement 1). After demographic adjustments, pathogen burden was higher among participants who were older, and those who were current smokers, while no association was observed with sex, leisure physical activity, and BMI (data not shown).

Following demographic adjustments, pathogen seropositivity was largely unrelated to inflammation marker levels (Online Supplement 2). However, as compared to their nondiabetic counterparts, diabetic participants had higher mean levels of CRP (4.42 vs. 3.68 mg/L; p = 0.0006), IL-6 (1.81 vs. 1.52 pg/mL; p < 0.0001), and fibrinogen (363 vs. 345 mg/dL; p < 0.0001).

In crude analyses, the prevalence of diabetes was higher among those with a pathogen burden ≥3, and among those with seropositivity to cytomegalovirus, H. pylori, hepatitis A, and herpes simplex virus, while no association was observed with C. pneumoniae (Table 1). Upon adjustment for race/ethnicity, however, all associations became non-significant.

Table 1
Prevalence ratio of diabetes by pathogen seropositivity; the MESA study, 2000-2002.

Associations remained non-significant following further adjustment for additional demographic variables, and for traditional diabetes risk factors (data not shown). Similar results were observed for both the crude and adjusted analyses when, among non-diabetic participants, insulin and glucose concentrations were modeled as dependent variables (data not shown).


In this multi-ethnic sample of 1,000 men and women, a greater prevalence of diabetes was found among those with a pathogen burden ≥3, and those with seropositivity to cytomegalovirus, H. pylori, hepatitis A, and herpes simplex virus. These associations were, however, highly confounded; after adjustment for demographic factors, particularly race/ethnicity, the prevalence of diabetes was not related to pathogen burden or to seropositivity to individual pathogens.

We originally hypothesized that the presence of prior infection would influence diabetes prevalence through increasing systemic inflammation [10]. In this dataset, however, seropositivity to the five pathogens studied was unrelated to several markers of systemic inflammation. Thus, our null results for diabetes are not surprising. As expected, inflammation marker levels were higher among those with diabetes.

Our null findings are contrary to those of several prior studies, which have reported diabetes prevalence to be elevated among participants with antibodies to cytomegalovirus [12] and herpes simplex virus [13]. H. pylori infection has been positively related to diabetes prevalence in most [14-17], but not all [18], prior studies. No literature was identified which assessed the relation between diabetes and infection with C. pneumoniae, hepatitis A virus, or total pathogen burden. Though not measured in MESA, infection with hepatitis B [19], hepatitis C [19-23], and periodontal pathogens [24] have generally been adversely associated with type 2 diabetes.

Prior studies exploring associations of infection by the pathogens assessed in MESA to prevalent diabetes are, however, limited. Most had extremely small sample sizes (n < 150) [12, 14-16], the majority had case-control rather than population-based designs [12, 14-16, 18], and some were conducted in clinical populations [12, 13, 17]. Further, as evidenced by our data, the relation between pathogen seropositivity and diabetes may be greatly confounded by sociodemographic factors; it is possible that confounding was not adequately controlled in some of these studies. Finally, publication bias may also provide an explanation for the discrepancy between our results and those of previously published studies.

There are also significant limitations of our study. Foremost, pathogen infection was determined based on seropositivity to IgG antibodies. IgG antibodies reflect prior infection, but are not sensitive indicators of current infection or the chronicity of prior infections. Though our results were null, it is possible that active pathogen infection, or chronic active infection, is associated with systemic inflammation and elevated diabetes risk. Unfortunately, our data are unable to address this issue. Notably, IgG antibodies were used to define infection in most [12, 13, 17, 18], but not all [14-16], prior studies assessing the relation between diabetes and the pathogens studied here.

Regardless of the means by which pathogen infection was assessed, inferences from cross-sectional data exploring the relation between pathogens and diabetes are tenuous, as the temporal direction of the relationship is unclear. While, as proposed in this manuscript, pathogen infection may lead to inflammation and diabetes, an alternate theory suggests that hyperglycemia may impair host defenses and predispose to infection [25]. Prospective data are clearly needed. This study’s null findings, however, do not provide support for either hypothesis. Another limitation of our study is that the prevalence of seropositivity was high for some pathogens, resulting in relatively low exposure variability.

While acknowledging several limitations, strengths of our study include the relatively large sample size, population-based ascertainment, and the large number of pathogens assessed. In this dataset, pathogen seropositivity was not related to prevalent diabetes or to systemic inflammation. Elevated levels of systemic inflammation markers have, however, emerged as a strong risk factor for diabetes [1-9], and rational mechanisms have been identified [10]. Elucidating factors that contribute to chronic systemic inflammation is an important goal in understanding, and potentially intervening on, type 2 diabetes.

Supplementary Material


This research was supported by contracts N01-HC-95159 through N01-HC-95166 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. PLL was supported as a predoctoral fellow on the training grant T32 HL07779. The authors thank the other investigators, the staff, and the participants of the MESA study for their valuable contributions. A full list of participating MESA investigators and institutions can be found at


C-reactive protein
body mass index
MultiEthnic Study of Atherosclerosis
coefficient of variation
prevalence ratio


Declaration of Competing Interests: Nothing to declare.


1. Hu FB, Meigs JB, Li TY, Rifai N, Manson JE. Inflammatory Markers and Risk of Developing Type 2 Diabetes in Women. Diabetes. 2004;53:693–700. [PubMed]
2. Pradhan AD, Manson JE, Rifai N, Buring JE, Ridker PM. C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin 6, and Risk of Developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. JAMA. 2001;286:327–334. [PubMed]
3. Spranger J, Kroke A, Mohlig M, Hoffmann K, Bergmann MM, Ristow M, et al. Inflammatory Cytokines and the Risk to Develop Type 2 Diabetes: Results of the Prospective Population-Based European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam Study. Diabetes. 2003;52:812–817. [PubMed]
4. Thorand B, Lowel H, Schneider A, Kolb H, Meisinger C, Frohlich M, et al. C-Reactive Protein as a Predictor for Incident Diabetes Mellitus Among Middle-aged Men: Results From the MONICA Augsburg Cohort Study, 1984-1998. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:93–99. [PubMed]
5. Thorand B, Kolb H, Baumert J, Koenig W, Chambless L, Meisinger C, et al. Elevated Levels of Interleukin-18 Predict the Development of Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the MONICA/KORA Augsburg Study, 1984-2002. Diabetes. 2005;54:2932–2938. [PubMed]
6. Doi Y, Kiyohara Y, Kubo M, Ninomiya T, Wakugawa Y, Yonemoto K, et al. Elevated C-Reactive Protein Is a Predictor of the Development of Diabetes in a General Japanese Population: The Hisayama Study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2497–2500. [PubMed]
7. Nakanishi S, Yamane K, Kamei N, Okubo M, Kohno N. Elevated C-Reactive Protein Is a Risk Factor for the Development of Type 2 Diabetes in Japanese Americans. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2754–2757. [PubMed]
8. Rutter MK, Meigs JB, Sullivan LM, D’Agostino RB, Sr, Wilson PWF. C-Reactive Protein, the Metabolic Syndrome, and Prediction of Cardiovascular Events in the Framingham Offspring Study. Circulation. 2004;110:380–385. [PubMed]
9. Festa A, D’Agostino R, Jr, Tracy RP, Haffner SM. Elevated Levels of Acute-Phase Proteins and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Predict the Development of Type 2 Diabetes: The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Diabetes. 2002;51:1131–1137. [PubMed]
10. Dandona P, Aljada A, Bandyopadhyay A. Inflammation: the link between insulin resistance, obesity and diabetes. Trends in Immunology. 2004;25:4. [PubMed]
11. Bild DE, Bluemke DA, Burke GL, Detrano R, Diez Roux AV, Folsom AR, et al. Multiethnic study of atherosclerosis: objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:871–881. [PubMed]
12. Roberts BW, Cech I. Association of type 2 diabetes mellitus and seroprevalence for cytomegalovirus. South Med J. 2005;98:686–692. [PubMed]
13. Sun Y, Pei W, Wu Y, Yang Y. An Association of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Infection With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:435–436. [PubMed]
14. Quadri R, Rossi C, Catalfamo E, Masoero G, Lombardo L, Della Monica P, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection in type 2 diabetic patients. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2000;10:263–266. [PubMed]
15. Gulcelik NE, Kaya E, Demirbas B, Culha C, Koc G, Ozkaya M, et al. Helicobacter pylori prevalence in diabetic patients and its relationship with dyspepsia and autonomic neuropathy. J Endocrinol Invest. 2005;28:214–217. [PubMed]
16. Quatrini M, Boarino V, Ghidoni A, Baldassarri AR, Bianchi PA, Bardella MT. Helicobacter pylori prevalence in patients with diabetes and its relationship to dyspeptic symptoms. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;32:215–217. [PubMed]
17. Longo-Mbenza B, Nkondi Nsenga J, Vangu Ngoma D. Prevention of the metabolic syndrome insulin resistance and the atherosclerotic diseases in Africans infected by Helicobacter pylori infection and treated by antibiotics. Int J Cardiol. 2007 [PubMed]
18. Xia HH-X, Talley NJ, Kam EPY, Young LJ, Hammer J, Horowitz M. Helicobacter pylori infection is not associated with diabetes mellitus, nor with upper gastrointestinal symptoms in diabetes mellitus. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2001;96:1039–1046. [PubMed]
19. Li-Ng M, Tropp S, Danoff A, Bini EJ. Association between chronic hepatitis B virus infection and diabetes among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders. Digestive and Liver Disease. 2007;39:549. [PubMed]
20. Antonelli A, Ferri C, Fallahi P, Pampana A, Ferrari SM, Goglia F, et al. Hepatitis C Virus Infection: Evidence for an association with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2548–2550. [PubMed]
21. Wang C-S, Wang S-T, Yao W-J, Chang T-T, Chou P. Community-based Study of Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Type 2 Diabetes: An Association Affected by Age and Hepatitis Severity Status. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:1154–1160. [PubMed]
22. Shruti H. Mehta FLBSASJSPDNJCMSDLT. Hepatitis C virus infection and incident type 2 diabetes. Hepatology. 2003;38:50–56. [PubMed]
23. Mehta SH, Brancati FL, Sulkowski MS, Strathdee SA, Szklo M, Thomas DL. Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus among Persons with Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:592–599. [PubMed]
24. Kim J, Amar S. Periodontal disease and systemic conditions: a bidirectional relationship. Odontology. 2006;94:10–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Butler SO, Btaiche IF, Alaniz C. Relationship between hyperglycemia and infection in critically ill patients. Pharmacotherapy. 2005;25:963–976. [PubMed]