In this study the goals at baseline were i) to establish that GI nematode specific cytokine responses could be measured in infants and ii) to determine the levels and balance of Th1/Th2 cytokines induced by initial exposure of infants to infections with
A. lumbricoides, hookworm or
T. trichiura. The prevalence of infection with these helminths in 5–11 month old infants in Pemba at the time of this study was only 26.5%
[44] but previous studies in Pemba have shown that the prevalence reaches 90% by the age of 3–5 yr
[14]. Transmission on the island is year round and so it is likely that many of the infections detected in the 6–24 month old infants in this study would represent recent primary exposures to infection. Despite this and the fact that the majority of infections were very light, cytokine responses to
Ascaris and to hookworm antigens could be demonstrated in significant proportions of the infants. Notably cytokines of the Th2 subset predominated amongst responders and there was no evidence of a subset of individuals who made Th1 polarised responses. This is in contrast to primary exposures of mice to the nematode
T. muris which induces Th2 responses in certain inbred strains but Th1 responses in others
[39].
Although
T. trichiura was a common infection in this age group minimal cytokine responses were seen to
Trichuris antigen. Low cytokine responses to
Trichuris antigens have also been reported in some studies of older humans
[53],
[54] while others have reported higher responses
[55],
[56]. We do not consider that the failure to detect cytokine responses to
T. trichiura infection in the infants was due to the use of the heterologous
Trichuris suis antigen since we showed in preliminary studies with the WBA that this antigen was able to stimulate cytokine production from blood of
T. trichiura infected Pemban teenagers. Furthermore, we also found that heterologous antigen from
T. muris (kindly provided by Prof J Bradley, University of Nottingham, UK), which has been shown to induce cytokine responses in older humans in other studies
[55],
[56] also failed to stimulate cytokine production from our
T. trichiura infected infants (data not shown). It is possible that the apparently greater sensitization to
Ascaris and hookworm antigen compared to
Trichuris is due to the fact that, unlike
Trichuris,
Ascaris and hookworms have a larval migratory phase which may have a major role in immune stimulation as was reported in an experimental hookworm infection
[35].
The cytokine responses to
Ascaris and hookworm antigens were significantly positively associated with age at baseline and also consistently increased between baseline and follow-up. These differences between baseline and follow-up were not due to technical differences since there was overlap between the testing of the samples from the baseline and follow-up and validation of all cytokine assays over the course of the study using a pool of positive control supernatant which was included on all plates. Since, the cytokine responses to PHA or PPD did not show this consistent increase at follow-up (data not shown) we conclude that the increased response reflects increased worm exposure over time. The greater frequency and level of Th2 compared with Th1 responses to
Ascaris and hookworm antigen seen at baseline were maintained over a year of further exposure. Such a Th2 bias is also apparent following prolonged exposure to
Ascaris and
Trichuris infections
[22],
[55] but a more balanced Th1/Th2 cytokine response has been reported in hookworm infection in children and adults
[24],
[57],
[58] although these studies employed purified peripheral blood cell in culture rather than whole blood which may have influenced the cytokine profiles demonstrated.
Amongst the
Ascaris or hookworm egg positive infants there were a higher proportion of responders to the homologous antigen than amongst egg negative infants or infants with a different species of worm indicating some degree of specificity in the antigen responses to particular worms. However, a proportion of infants lacking
Ascaris or hookworm infections but harbouring one or both of the other worms also responded to
Ascaris or hookworm antigens respectively. This could be due to antigen-specific sensitization by prepatent infections in these individuals or to a failure of parasitological detection of infection. However, it may also reflect a degree of cross-reactivity in the responses to the worm antigens as previously suggested
[22],
[59]. Antigenic cross-reactivity is also supported by the work of Jackson et al 2004
[56] who reported that cytokine responses to somatic
T. trichiura,
T. muris and
A. lumbricoides antigens in WBA were strongly intercorrelated even though the majority of people in the study area had single
T. trichiura or
A. lumbricoides infections. Another possible explanation for positive responses in parasitologically negative infants could be prenatal priming to helminth antigens in helminth infected mothers
[60].
A proportion of infants who were infected with
Ascaris and hookworm did not make detectable antigen-specific cytokine responses. This was not correlated with intensity of infection and so does not seem to be due to a sub-threshold level of immune priming. A possible explanation is that the larval phase of infection rather than the persisting egg-laying adult worms may be largely responsible for the cytokine production
[35] and so responders may be the more frequently/more recently exposed individuals.
With regard to our starting hypothesis, that the immune response to the worms may contribute to anaemia and wasting malnutrition in infected infants it is clear that the idea of Th1 sensitisation leading to pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6 affecting nutrient metabolism, erythropoiesis and appetite is not supported by this data. The analysis of acute phase proteins and nutritional indicators will be reported elsewhere (manuscript in preparation). It is conceivable that the GI nematode-specific Th2 cytokines demonstrated in infants could be responsible for impaired nutrition due to effects on gut function as demonstrated in mice and pigs
[27]–
[31] and/or increased nutritional demand due to the generation of immune components. However, we found no evidence that periodic anthelminthic treatment reduced the level of systemic Th2 responses although it again led to reduced anaemia and wasting malnutrition (manuscript in preparation). The only response correlating with worm infection status which was significantly altered by treatment was the decline in peripheral blood eosinophilia. Eosinophil infiltration local to sites of worm infestation has been shown in humans harbouring light
T. trichiura infections
[61] and eosinophils have been implicated in the enteritis induced by zoonotic hookworms
[36]. So perhaps eosinophils are involved in mediating gut inflammation and impairing nutrition. Other locally generated responses could impact on gut inflammation and function e.g. helminth-infected infants make more pronounced inflammatory cytokine responses to generic TLR ligands
[62]. It should be pointed out that immune responses local to the worms in the gut may differ from recall responses seen in the periphery e.g. in pigs
T. suis induces a much higher frequency of IL-4 positive cells in ileo-caecal lymph node lymphocytes compared to PBMCs
[63]. So reduction in the numbers of worms by chemotherapy may significantly reduce local immunopathological effects in the gut even in the face of unaltered systemic immune responses.
Following the implementation of various helminth control programmes in Pemba Island, the prevalence and intensity of infections in the infants in this study were low and Trichuris predominated. Similar studies in areas of higher transmission and with other species predominating would be of interest.